You're videos are really helpful. Liked how you walk through example on board before starting code. Can you do something about video volume. It's really low. It's really hard to hear you. Thanks ANDY.
That’s what I was thinking, the more pointers , the more chance of making an error , we really don’t need a removedNode , a pre.next.next would do the job
thank you for this solution...it would be helpful if you can do something about your audio...it is really low in your videos.
You're videos are really helpful. Liked how you walk through example on board before starting code. Can you do something about video volume. It's really low. It's really hard to hear you. Thanks ANDY.
Great, it helped me understand dummy head. Also instead of introducing removedNode variable prev(dot)next(dot)next as we removing just one node.
That’s what I was thinking, the more pointers , the more chance of making an error , we really don’t need a removedNode , a pre.next.next would do the job
@@sourenasahraian2055 It changes the time, it doubles it as It has to look ahead instead of just knowing.
These videos are a blessing 🙏
Great video, the audio is very low though
Volume up pls....