Hello po, Dean Bisquera! God bless for helping law students,. Revieweesand. All those very interested in Law. I feel as a. Citizen of this country, all must listen to your uploads in You tube. Very friendly, in the sense that you.use words that can be.u deratood. Thank you po. Your human touch is amazing
On the warrantless search Dean, I also took the risk of answering in the negative citing doctrine of hot pursuit, and that the seizing is synchronized with the warrantless arrest pursuant to hot pursuit. My mind then is battling whether I will point that the the seized items are fruits of a poisonous tree, or an illegally obtained evidence. Thank you for the clarifications on the matter and I hope my answer will still be given points. I do not know that my personal bias, due to closeness to police officers, perhaps, has affected my appreciation of the case.
Hello Kidd Ruiz Castro. Pray hard that your Answer be given recognition by the Examiners. For fundamentals, in the Concept the State's Structure, we have no issue that Sovereign is unconditionally in the hands of the PEOPLE who never surrender their Human Rights and codified them in the Bill of Rights. Having said that, in that matter of the Deprivation of Life, Liberty and Property, it becomes imperative that said deprivation can only be done with DUE PROCESS of LAW so as not to compromise Human Rights. Hence, Arrest to deprive a Citizen of Liberty can only be done in the strictest sense of DUE PROCESS. Hence, a Warrantless Arrest should be strictly observed. The matter of procedurally securing a Warrant of Arrest from a disinterested Court Judge is not difficult and should be imperatively adhered to. However, what is significant is that a Judge, who is disinterested to determine the existence of Probable Cause on hard evidence, is definitely to correct the anomalous situation where the arresting Police Officer becomes Judge and Executioner rolled into one.
@@joesantosbbisquera, fortunately Dean, I passed the bar po. Your suggested answers really enlightened me and helped me relaxed my doubts while waiting the result of the bar exams.
Thank you very much for uploading your extremely helpful and insightful videos. It seems that your fan is interfering with you voice, though, not at all drowning your clear voice. God bless.
Hi Dean. Q12. Regarding UN GenAss Reso: No, they are not valid source of State Obligation under International law. In the case of Pharmaceutical and Health Care Association of the Philippines vs. Health Secretary, the Court held that the declarations and resolutions of the UN General Assembly are considered to be "soft law" which are merely recommendatory and further regarded as an expression of non-binding norms, principles, and practices that influence state behavior.
You are right in your citation. But that is what is interesting about Law - wonderful Concepts can clash along the way. I agree that those UN Declarations and Resolutions do not automatically become part of Philippine Law unless a legislative enactment is undertaken. But the Constitution mandates that we abide by treaties and international agreements for which we voluntarily submitted ourselves under the Principle of Pacta Sun Servanda. At the end, Philippine Domestic Prevail within Philippine Jurisdiction is Sovereign because we cannot compromise the thought that Philippine Sovereignty is absolute. So, while Pacta sun Servando mandates we adopt UN treaties, at the end, the Concept of Salus Populi est Suprema Lex prevails. What is good for our Sovereign PEOPLE must be the overriding consideration.
Hi po. Regarding equal protection clause. Would an argument that it must be germane to the purpose of the law be given merit? Since it is prohibited under the law to discriminate a religion.
On question number 10 po. Answer ko po is law making power is vested in the legislature. The SC cannot interfere without grave abuse of discretion. Would this suffice po?
Puwede yon because Legislation stands for the PEOPLE expressing their Sovereign Discretionary Will in the Exercise of taking on POLICY (Political) Issues. However, the Supreme Court can declare a law unconstitutional, even when it expresses supposedly the Dictates of the PEOPLE who cannot disagree with their overriding POLICY as they enshrined in the Constitution.
UM LAW in said 2020-21 BAR Exams hit 75% for its 1st Takers, same performance in 2006. I was Dean in both instances. All told, 16 BAR Passers account for UM LAW's recent performance.
Hello Manny, Question 10 wishes to Highlight the importance of Judicial Review, whose "mother" Concept is indeed the Separation of Powers. I guess the Examiner will give you points for your Answer.
Manny. in No. 11, the focus is on the exercise of Ministerial vs Discretionary Powers. This was again asked in Procedural Law and I called attention to it. Separation of Powers may have some points, because it is not wrong, but it was not solicit the maximum points you wish. Good luck, Atty. Manny Kent Regulacion. Email me when you pass, hah, promise . . . regards, your friend, Dean Joe
Good morning Dean, thank you so much for the explanation. Sigoro hindi ko masyado na analyze ng mabuti ang questions. If makapasa ako this bar (hopefully sana magrant ni Lord ang prayers ko), email ako kaagad sa inyo Dean. Thank you so much po.
Hello po, Dean Bisquera! God bless for helping law students,. Revieweesand. All those very interested in Law. I feel as a. Citizen of this country, all must listen to your uploads in You tube. Very friendly, in the sense that you.use words that can be.u deratood. Thank you po. Your human touch is amazing
Thank you so much, Dean. Keepsafe po and God bless your good heart.
Sir, pwede po mag-attend ng last lecture po niyo 1 month before bar exam September 2023? ❤
1:15:40 foreclosure
On the warrantless search Dean, I also took the risk of answering in the negative citing doctrine of hot pursuit, and that the seizing is synchronized with the warrantless arrest pursuant to hot pursuit. My mind then is battling whether I will point that the the seized items are fruits of a poisonous tree, or an illegally obtained evidence. Thank you for the clarifications on the matter and I hope my answer will still be given points. I do not know that my personal bias, due to closeness to police officers, perhaps, has affected my appreciation of the case.
Hello Kidd Ruiz Castro. Pray hard that your Answer be given recognition by the Examiners.
For fundamentals, in the Concept the State's Structure, we have no issue that Sovereign is unconditionally in the hands of the PEOPLE who never surrender their Human Rights and codified them in the Bill of Rights.
Having said that, in that matter of the Deprivation of Life, Liberty and Property, it becomes imperative that said deprivation can only be done with DUE PROCESS of LAW so as not to compromise Human Rights. Hence, Arrest to deprive a Citizen of Liberty can only be done in the strictest sense of DUE PROCESS. Hence, a Warrantless Arrest should be strictly observed. The matter of procedurally securing a Warrant of Arrest from a disinterested Court Judge is not difficult and should be imperatively adhered to. However, what is significant is that a Judge, who is disinterested to determine the existence of Probable Cause on hard evidence, is definitely to correct the anomalous situation where the arresting Police Officer becomes Judge and Executioner rolled into one.
@@joesantosbbisquera, fortunately Dean, I passed the bar po. Your suggested answers really enlightened me and helped me relaxed my doubts while waiting the result of the bar exams.
@@atty.kiddruizcastro Congratulations po Atty.!
Thank you very much for uploading your extremely helpful and insightful videos. It seems that your fan is interfering with you voice, though, not at all drowning your clear voice. God bless.
Hi Dean. Q12. Regarding UN GenAss Reso:
No, they are not valid source of State Obligation under International law.
In the case of Pharmaceutical and Health Care Association of the Philippines vs. Health Secretary, the Court held that the declarations and resolutions of the UN General Assembly are considered to be "soft law" which are merely recommendatory and further regarded as an expression of non-binding norms, principles, and practices that influence state behavior.
You are right in your citation. But that is what is interesting about Law - wonderful Concepts can clash along the way. I agree that those UN Declarations and Resolutions do not automatically become part of Philippine Law unless a legislative enactment is undertaken. But the Constitution mandates that we abide by treaties and international agreements for which we voluntarily submitted ourselves under the Principle of Pacta Sun Servanda. At the end, Philippine Domestic Prevail within Philippine Jurisdiction is Sovereign because we cannot compromise the thought that Philippine Sovereignty is absolute. So, while Pacta sun Servando mandates we adopt UN treaties, at the end, the Concept of Salus Populi est Suprema Lex prevails. What is good for our Sovereign PEOPLE must be the overriding consideration.
thank you sir
Most welcome
Hi po. Regarding equal protection clause. Would an argument that it must be germane to the purpose of the law be given merit? Since it is prohibited under the law to discriminate a religion.
On question number 10 po. Answer ko po is law making power is vested in the legislature. The SC cannot interfere without grave abuse of discretion. Would this suffice po?
Puwede yon because Legislation stands for the PEOPLE expressing their Sovereign Discretionary Will in the Exercise of taking on POLICY (Political) Issues. However, the Supreme Court can declare a law unconstitutional, even when it expresses supposedly the Dictates of the PEOPLE who cannot disagree with their overriding POLICY as they enshrined in the Constitution.
Dean, may I respectfully ask how the UM Bar hopefuls fared in the recently concluded exams? TIA.
UM LAW in said 2020-21 BAR Exams hit 75% for its 1st Takers, same performance in 2006. I was Dean in both instances. All told, 16 BAR Passers account for UM LAW's recent performance.
@@joesantosbbisquera salamat po sa pagsagot. kung loloobin ng Dios, sa UM po ako mag-aabogasya.
Thank you po Dean. This helps a lot po. I hope you could make more contents about other past bar exam questions.
73 na yung UA-cam Uploads natin, Marvin. Have your watched them all?
My Answers to the November 2022, one of the toughest BAR Exams, are wonderful perspectives to the Questions asked. Go ahead and watch them.
Thank You Dean!!! 🙏🏻 Subscribed po. :)
What Law School are you from? Did you take the Feb 2022 BAR Exams?
Yes Dean, Cagayan State University po.
Hello Dean good evening. Regarding sa Question #10, I answered the doctrine of separation of powers. Okay lang ba siya na argument? Thank you Dean.
Ganun po din sa Question # 11, separation of powers parin ang argument ko.
Hello Manny, Question 10 wishes to Highlight the importance of Judicial Review, whose "mother" Concept is indeed the Separation of Powers. I guess the Examiner will give you points for your Answer.
Manny. in No. 11, the focus is on the exercise of Ministerial vs Discretionary Powers. This was again asked in Procedural Law and I called attention to it. Separation of Powers may have some points, because it is not wrong, but it was not solicit the maximum points you wish. Good luck, Atty. Manny Kent Regulacion. Email me when you pass, hah, promise . . . regards, your friend, Dean Joe
Good morning Dean, thank you so much for the explanation. Sigoro hindi ko masyado na analyze ng mabuti ang questions. If makapasa ako this bar (hopefully sana magrant ni Lord ang prayers ko), email ako kaagad sa inyo Dean. Thank you so much po.
Hello Dean, I made it! Thank you so much.