КОМЕНТАРІ •

  • @mariagardnercox
    @mariagardnercox 2 роки тому +72

    Honestly, I’d love parts 2, 3, etc of this. You explain things in a straightforward, easy-to-understand manner. Thank you!

    • @AmericanViscountess
      @AmericanViscountess 2 роки тому +4

      Glad it was helpful!

    • @Jrome719
      @Jrome719 5 місяців тому +1

      American English, how glorious the sound is…

    • @MarcoChang-i9l
      @MarcoChang-i9l 4 місяці тому

      @@AmericanViscountess dear Viscountess Hinchingbrooke, I do wish to know one thing. Why was Queen Elizabeth II not Princess of Wales before she became Queen, but King Charles III was Prince of Wales before he became King

  • @roberthossen8354
    @roberthossen8354 2 роки тому +122

    My dearest Vicountess, I'm afraid I must correct you on one thing. The husband of Queen Victoria, Prince Albert was not King Consort, but Prince Consort. Only the husband of Mary Queen of Scots was styled King Consort.

    • @04nbod
      @04nbod 2 роки тому +5

      Husband of Mary I was too, Philip of Spain

    • @adamross1596
      @adamross1596 4 місяці тому +6

      @@04nbod Phillip wasn't King consort, but King(Joint with his wife) of England and Spain

    • @xavier550
      @xavier550 4 місяці тому +1

      Parliament made it that Phillips title ended with the death of his wife. He was in earnest a King Consort.

    • @winston3109
      @winston3109 4 місяці тому +3

      @@adamross1596Correct! The right term is King jure uxoris (by the right of his wife) of England.

    • @vitroz
      @vitroz 4 місяці тому

      This poor woman must be treated horribly by the vile English Establishment. Abolish the embarrassing and redundant royal family!

  • @alvick353
    @alvick353 2 роки тому +28

    That was precise, brief, and to the point. Thank you for the knowledge without wasting anyone's time.

  • @117Pinkyflower
    @117Pinkyflower 2 роки тому +37

    You are so full of historical information! I love it when you put out this type of information!♥️

  • @oliver0liver
    @oliver0liver 2 роки тому +21

    Dear Viscountess Hinchingbrook, thank you for making us American girls proud of you as a representative of us, love your channel and your super cute apartment in Italy❤️

    • @AmericanViscountess
      @AmericanViscountess 2 роки тому +4

      Thank you so much!

    • @kathryn1304
      @kathryn1304 2 роки тому +3

      Agree, thank you for being such an excellent representative of American women! Xx

  • @mrskrabbs7857
    @mrskrabbs7857 2 роки тому +34

    I'm orignally from Sandwich Ma named after the Earl of Sandwich. It's a pretty little town on Cape Cod. Yes the police cars say Sandwich police on them and all the tourists laugh and take pictures of them! Anyhow, I enjoy your videos! RIP to Queen Elizabeth also!!!

    • @MizQue
      @MizQue 2 роки тому +6

      The Sandwich, MA motto is the same as Julie's family's, "After so many shipwrecks, a haven".

    • @Rye_Toast
      @Rye_Toast 6 місяців тому +2

      Sandwich Police, I love it! Is there an Earl of Donut as well? ;)
      I think this is what I enjoyed the most about growing up in the midAtlantic region of the US (which is similar to New England) is all the territories and towns named after places back in England. Yes, we were a colony and we learn all about it, but when you see all the commonalities you really understand how those who came over from England influenced the earliest US settlements to make it feel like home. I grew up in the Philadelphia area and you can't throw a rock without hitting a reference to somewhere (or someone) in the UK.

    • @Katesharpandvoice
      @Katesharpandvoice 4 місяці тому

      When I lived in Sommerville, MA, I visited the Cape and on the way through Sandwich, MA there was a police car outside the Dunkin' Donuts which said "Sandwich Police" Ha, ha, ha!

  • @clavel89
    @clavel89 2 роки тому +23

    Prince Albert never got King Consort lol, he was simply known as Albert, Prince Consort lol.

    • @XandrdC
      @XandrdC 4 місяці тому +2

      Been a year with this correction, and no response. But the sycophants get replies. How telling.

    • @JayRasheed718
      @JayRasheed718 4 місяці тому

      @@XandrdCI know right 😂 that’s how most content creators are, don’t respond to honesty which they mistake for negativity.

  • @annettestewart
    @annettestewart 2 роки тому +33

    Prince Albert was never called King Consort. He only was granted Prince Consort after many years of HM Queen Victoria asking for it from Parliment.

    • @lydiabarber8931
      @lydiabarber8931 2 місяці тому +1

      That’s why late Queen Elisabeth announced changing Camilla from Princess Consort to Queen Consort. But Alas, Charles changed it to Queen.

    • @annettestewart
      @annettestewart 2 місяці тому

      ​@@lydiabarber8931the spouse of the Monarch is granted the title of consort. Prince Phillip was never called Prince Consort, Queen Camilla only used Queen consort till coronation to give us chance to get used to used the loss of our Queen. Queen consort or Queen Camilla is the same thing

  • @kathya9522
    @kathya9522 2 роки тому +5

    You don’t know how much I needed and appreciate this well-presented vlog.

  • @RaiLen0
    @RaiLen0 2 роки тому +3

    Madam you're a breath of fresh air,it's wonderful to learn about history and peerage system thank you for sharing with us.

  • @alicialexists
    @alicialexists 2 роки тому +2

    Thank you, Viscountess. I am an American who is writing a fictional monarchy, and your explanation of the titles is helping me so much.

  • @ggCA07
    @ggCA07 2 роки тому +8

    This was a great video. You explained it simply. Of course its WAY more complicated when you consider widows, styles, forms of address, formal styles, and historical/extinct titles and ranks(i.e. Ealdorman). Then there is also the title "Prince of Wales" and court titles like Lord High Constable, Lord High Chamberlain, Lord High Admiral etc.

  • @01Lenda
    @01Lenda 2 роки тому +4

    I truly appreciate you, so much more, for absolutely embracing all you have, being grateful for it and making it 💯% yours and so much better! Thank you for being such a remarkable lady! 🌸🌿💕

  • @janicedelp2775
    @janicedelp2775 2 роки тому +6

    Thanks, Julie, for explaining all about the monarch titles, etc. So interesting and nice to know. Janice from Arkansas USA

  • @kristiLB93
    @kristiLB93 2 роки тому +4

    I LOVE learning about this kind of thing!

  • @amish-landchateau
    @amish-landchateau 2 роки тому +8

    Thanks so much for this vlog! Fascinating and so well done!💛💐🙋‍♀️

  • @henryashford9344
    @henryashford9344 2 роки тому +7

    Another fantastic video Julie! I am at school with Nestor and I am very grateful that he introduced me to your channel. Also you should ask him about his future career in boxing.

    • @AmericanViscountess
      @AmericanViscountess 2 роки тому +4

      Thanks Henry! I'll be sure to mention boxing to him now! :-)

  • @gingerninjawhinger9986
    @gingerninjawhinger9986 2 роки тому +5

    Informative, short and sweet and covered everything, I always find your vlogs fascinating, Julie. I look forward to many more!

  • @clivemilner
    @clivemilner 2 роки тому +5

    Thank you for the video. I lived in Devizes Castle for 7 years. It was a great privilege.

  • @enemde3025
    @enemde3025 2 роки тому +4

    Short but very informative. Thank you.

  • @nicholasdiezmckenna9972
    @nicholasdiezmckenna9972 2 роки тому +4

    Hi Julie, loved watching you on Ladies of London and so happy that you are doing so much royal history, British history etc. My favourite topics with a favourite person! So happy I found this! xx

  • @rosemariedeschenes7013
    @rosemariedeschenes7013 2 роки тому +3

    Thanks for taking the time to explain all the titles ❤😍😘

  • @eveaward5343
    @eveaward5343 2 роки тому +3

    Hi from USA, VA. I love learning now and history!

  • @Elvertaw
    @Elvertaw 2 роки тому +4

    Thank you for a very understandable explanation. I’ve heard titles explained before but your video made a lot more sense.
    /thanks!!

  • @gorgo1945
    @gorgo1945 2 роки тому +16

    Thank you for explaining how it all works - love the background setting of your video too:-) but is it possible please to turn down the volume of the background music? Just found it a little distracting as I was trying to concentrate on the great information being given. xx

    • @AmericanViscountess
      @AmericanViscountess 2 роки тому +5

      Yes of course!

    • @sknap2728
      @sknap2728 2 роки тому +3

      Wow, she must have lowered it, bcz i didnt even notice it and had to go back to listen again. Sounds great.

  • @katherinekinnaird4408
    @katherinekinnaird4408 2 роки тому +3

    Very interesting and clearly unpacked. Thank you.

  • @stacylamb5607
    @stacylamb5607 2 роки тому +3

    You explained it so beautifully .

  • @stevearnold8467
    @stevearnold8467 2 роки тому +20

    I've been totally fascinated by all of this ever since my first visit to England in 1976. I have a question - I always understood that Queen Victoria wanted Albert to be called King Consort but that Parliament refused to allow that title. You video says to the contrary. Wikipedia seems to back up the position that Albert was denied this title and was given instead the title of Prince Consort in 1857. What is correct here? I love your channels and enjoy each new video very much.

    • @AmericanViscountess
      @AmericanViscountess 2 роки тому +9

      It’s what he wanted to be known as.

    • @stevearnold8467
      @stevearnold8467 2 роки тому +5

      @@AmericanViscountess Yes, that's what I've always understood. Maybe if he'd lived long enough Parliament would have given in.

    • @panda5122
      @panda5122 2 роки тому +6

      Why does it matter what he wanted to be known as or what he went by in private? Officially he was Prince Consort. It's confusing and historically inaccurate to suggest that the regnant queen's spouse is the king consort.

  • @melissadriver7615
    @melissadriver7615 2 роки тому +1

    I really enjoyed listen and watching this. I found it exceptionally interesting! Thanks so much!!!❤😊❤

  • @Dejo2106
    @Dejo2106 2 роки тому +1

    I just found your channel this morning. Thank you for the content, and greetings from the NW suburbs.

  • @jenjem5810
    @jenjem5810 2 роки тому +4

    Julie, Very well done.
    Bravo 👏

  • @mariaangelesmarinramirez5376
    @mariaangelesmarinramirez5376 8 місяців тому +1

    Julie it is very good explanation about the titles.

  • @ycabonifacio
    @ycabonifacio 4 місяці тому

    I STUMBLED UPON YOUR CHANNEL AND AM INLOVE ALREADY! thank you for sharing, viscountess

  • @ap85jp87
    @ap85jp87 2 роки тому +13

    After watching the Queen's Funeral, I wondered if you could explain all of the "guards". Why does one guard have a green feather, another a red, etc. Some wear kilts, some are Beefeaters. I was interested in the Officers that marched beside the hearse. If you could recommend a website or book about this it would be helpful. Thank you!

    • @AmericanViscountess
      @AmericanViscountess 2 роки тому +14

      Will looks into doing a vlog on this! thanks!

    • @mattheww2797
      @mattheww2797 2 роки тому +2

      You may want to check out Mark Felton's channel for the military stuff

    • @ap85jp87
      @ap85jp87 2 роки тому +1

      @@mattheww2797 thank you, it’s a great site.

  • @marytanne4964
    @marytanne4964 2 роки тому +1

    Thank you Julie for explaining British titles which can be complicated. I was fortunate to have met Princess Alexandra of Kent when I worked in London in the 1970's. To meet an actual Princess for an American like me was amazing! Hope to meet you someday also!

  • @angelaharvey2034
    @angelaharvey2034 2 роки тому +10

    I know the history of the titles but it was interesting to hear when and who the first Earl of Sandwich got his title. I would also state that Albert was known as Prince consort to Queen Victoria.

    • @AmericanViscountess
      @AmericanViscountess 2 роки тому +5

      Hi and yes all fascinating. He was known as that publicly but wanted to be King Consort and from what I'm told he was known as that in his inner circles.

  • @pammiedoodle8693
    @pammiedoodle8693 2 роки тому +1

    Fascinating history lesson, Julie!
    Answered some confusing head-spinning questions for this girl from the Midwest, USA! Lol!
    Thanks much🥰

  • @elizabetha.morgan1869
    @elizabetha.morgan1869 2 роки тому +1

    Very simply put, Thank you Julie. Very much appreciated.

  • @PaulGualtieri-m6v
    @PaulGualtieri-m6v 6 місяців тому +1

    Hi Julie. Enjoyed your show on English estates and this video. Subbed.

  • @YonB60
    @YonB60 2 роки тому +4

    As an American Anglophile in SC, I find your channels to be always fascinating. I have learned much and I greatly appreciate the quality of the content, visuals, and sound of your videos (vlogs). They are exceptionally well done. Today the blue dress you are wearing is so striking and you look wonderful in it. Thanks for all the sharing, the knowledge, the enthusiasm, and the laughter.

  • @sanjayarman
    @sanjayarman 10 місяців тому +2

    Very well explained.
    Our Kumar Family hails from a special royal heritage from India.
    The literal meaning of Kumar is "Prince" and Kumari is "Princess".
    These were shortened, or truncated, from Rajkumar & Rajkumari respectively.
    Although I am from a 3rd generation descendant of my Paternal Grandfather living in the United States,
    we always have had an extraordinary sense of pride for our unique lineage.
    In India, there were Maharajas and Shahs, who were the kings of various kingdoms.
    My Paternal Grandfather was the Diwan of Gangpur Kingdom
    which was a medium-sized kingdom in pre-independent India.
    A Diwan can also have overlapping role comparisons with a Royal Vizier.
    So, my Paternal Grandfather's position at the Gangpur Palace, called Kishore Mahal, was a
    Minister in rank right below the Maharaja, or King of Gangpur.
    We, including my Dear Wife, Radha Kumari Devi, our two Dear Children,
    Sanjay Arman Kumar II
    Sanjana Shafali Shaharazade
    are very proud that we have our own separate
    Diwan Coat of Arms & Crest, and to be descendants of the
    Diwan of Gangpur
    Dr. Sanjay Kumar I
    & The Entire
    Diwan of Gangpur Family

    • @el-jp3xp
      @el-jp3xp 4 місяці тому

      Do you have a toilet of your own

  • @jena1887
    @jena1887 2 роки тому +3

    This is very interesting. Thank you for explaining!

  • @loganweingarten7
    @loganweingarten7 2 роки тому +6

    I’m confused: are you an American citizen or dual citizenship? Because I believe the constitution forbids titles of nobility unless with congressional consent. I am just curious.

  • @kendralucas9809
    @kendralucas9809 5 місяців тому +1

    I love you! Thanks for the video! Anglophile in Florida!

  • @paulinewayland713
    @paulinewayland713 4 місяці тому

    Fascinating, thankyou for explaining this, I always wondered how these titles were bestowed

  • @cyrilmarasigan7108
    @cyrilmarasigan7108 2 роки тому +5

    Please make a video about baronets cause it was interesting since they were in between nobility and knighthood which is kinda confusing since where are they really in both groups nobility or knighthood and also what are their roles when James I created it and can they be passed down through generations and what also please make a video about curtesy types

    • @lordsauron4556
      @lordsauron4556 4 місяці тому

      I was going to mention the same thing. They are basically hereditary knights and can use Sir in front of their name. For example, some of my own ancestors were the Baronets Colclough of Tintern. You can see that they used the family name and place in their title (much like a baron) sometimes; most of the time it would be just Sir X Colclough, Y’th Baronet

  • @brendam5356
    @brendam5356 2 роки тому +2

    Thankyou so much American Viscountess Julie for explaining the titles I now can explain to my family I find the Royal and aristocracy just fascinating 😍👌Have a fabulous weekend my love I’d love to know about who to curtesy to💖💖👌👌🌟🌟

    • @AmericanViscountess
      @AmericanViscountess 2 роки тому +2

      Good idea for my next vlog!

    • @brendam5356
      @brendam5356 2 роки тому

      @@AmericanViscountess Thankyou for considering I just love all the history grazie mille 💖👌

  • @ryeofoatmeal
    @ryeofoatmeal 2 роки тому +1

    been looking for this and it appears on my yt rec. thanks for the explanation 😀

  • @torycook1215
    @torycook1215 2 роки тому +3

    love your new style of dressing.
    very regal 🏆👍🇬🇧

  • @deardiary8292
    @deardiary8292 2 роки тому +1

    Thank you sincerely for this, it was insightfully.

  • @OG-S1158
    @OG-S1158 Рік тому +1

    Don’t forget Baronets ! The only noble heriditary title that is not a peerage - ranked above all knights (except thistle and garter) and below all peers
    Baronets are part of the baronetage an honour that is all it’s own !

  • @tfh5575
    @tfh5575 2 роки тому +2

    such a fascinating family history

  • @denasutera
    @denasutera 2 роки тому +2

    Awesome and very much appreciated. Thanks you

  • @ludovica8221
    @ludovica8221 2 роки тому +3

    Julie! Prince Albert was "The Prince Consort" same with Prince George of Denmark, consort of Queen Anne

    • @AmericanViscountess
      @AmericanViscountess 2 роки тому +2

      Yes he was but he wanted King Consort and was referred to that in the inner circles.

    • @melodyclark1944
      @melodyclark1944 2 роки тому

      Not the same. George of Denmark was a prince consort, but Victoria's husband was the only time there was an official Prince Consort.

    • @ludovica8221
      @ludovica8221 2 роки тому

      @@melodyclark1944 Its the same thing. One has capital letters to soothe his wounded ego thats all.. shrug..

  • @mariadocarmogodinho7661
    @mariadocarmogodinho7661 2 роки тому +5

    Hi Julie, good explanation, congratulations on making it so short and au point! Sorry to note, but shouldn't you mean Countsess of Wessex instead of Essex? Waiting for next episode, as always! Regards from Portugal 🙂

    • @AmericanViscountess
      @AmericanViscountess 2 роки тому +6

      There’s also a Countess of Essex who was an American 🥰

    • @mariadocarmogodinho7661
      @mariadocarmogodinho7661 2 роки тому +3

      @@AmericanViscountessoh so sorry, didn't know, must research the Countess of Essex and learn a bit more! So sorry, she was next to other royal titles, just assume it could be just one letter short... 😅 Thank you for explaining to me! See you in your next episode!

    • @s6r231
      @s6r231 2 роки тому +1

      @@AmericanViscountess That sent me down quite the rabbit hole! The current Earl is 78, unmarried with no heir and after him, the title will go to his fourth cousin once removed who is American.

    • @davidlauder-qi5zv
      @davidlauder-qi5zv Рік тому

      ​@@mariadocarmogodinho7661 A Countess is a member of the Nobility, not of The Royal Family.

  • @ourcozycorner8517
    @ourcozycorner8517 2 роки тому +2

    This was delightful. Thank you 😊

  • @BlissfulDee
    @BlissfulDee 2 роки тому +6

    I'm intrigued by Baronets. Apparently some view them peers while others don't?

    • @ludovica8221
      @ludovica8221 2 роки тому

      I can help you here.... ua-cam.com/video/dQpVqNyrsBI/v-deo.html

  • @arianebrendaalberskristian5866
    @arianebrendaalberskristian5866 2 роки тому +1

    Just love you and your videos. Thank- you!!!

  • @shellyroke
    @shellyroke 2 роки тому +4

    With the change in the Line of Succession putting Princess Charlotte 3rd in line now, is there any chance title structures may chance, allowing the Royal Princesses to inherit a Dukedom?

    • @rivenoak
      @rivenoak 2 роки тому +1

      that's up to the king. such stuff is written into the letter patent and for example the title Duke of Marlborough went to a woman as second holder and then to her sister's son.
      Charles could create his sister Anne as duchess marchioness countess whatever in her own right, no problem. same with Charlotte upon her marriage (the usual timestamp to receive a title in royal family)

    • @elasticharmony
      @elasticharmony 2 роки тому +1

      not impossible because the queen of duc of nomandy.

  • @DrBLReid
    @DrBLReid 2 роки тому +3

    Very informative.

  • @walkaboutnewyork3413
    @walkaboutnewyork3413 2 роки тому +2

    What with the coronation of King Charles III likely to take place next year, please consider an upcoming video explaining the roles your father-in-law, The Earl of Sandwich, and your husband, Viscount Hinchingbrook will play on that important day.

  • @AlexKS1992
    @AlexKS1992 Рік тому

    If you’re a Hapsburg you can have a lot of titles. Franz Joseph of Austria-Hungary had so many titles I can’t name them all.

  • @CGH250
    @CGH250 2 роки тому +2

    Love your amazing channel! ❤️👍🇺🇸

  • @garrettwitkowski4193
    @garrettwitkowski4193 2 роки тому +1

    I have a few questions? What about Lords and Ladys or would it be Lordship and Ladieship titles? Who gets them? How are they appointed and where do they rank in the title and or hierarchy of nobility? Does that also include knights and dames? Where do they rank in the hierarchy of things? If you could please let me know or rather do a new segment of these titles on you show? If at all possible? I thank you most kindly and do appreciate it.

  • @jennifernielsen599
    @jennifernielsen599 2 роки тому +1

    Very informative Julie. Thank you!!!

  • @susanstopher1727
    @susanstopher1727 2 роки тому +1

    Thanks for explaining the titles

  • @longwaytotipperary
    @longwaytotipperary 2 роки тому +1

    Thank you, Julie,

  • @Bamidele-ee8ch
    @Bamidele-ee8ch 11 місяців тому +1

    What does a title actually look like? Is it a collection of documents or is it a legal name change?

  • @janaheinrichs1981
    @janaheinrichs1981 2 роки тому +3

    Thank you for this lovely video. However, there are a few inaccuracies:
    First, Prince Albert was Prince Consort, not King Consort. The title "King Consort" does not exist in Britain, as far as I'm aware. In fact, Albert was awarded the title "Prince Consort" 17 years into his marriage to Queen Victoria. Before this, he simply held the title that he was born with, Prince of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha, with the additional style of Royal Highness that he was given a few days prior to his wedding.
    Second, although there is currently an extant Earldom of Essex and therefore probably a Countess of Essex, as you listed the titles of the British Royal family at the beginning of the video, I assume you meant the Countess of Wessex?
    Third, considering the titles of a monarch's grandchildren in the female line, using the title of Prince/Princess is *not* optional. Descendants in the female line do not have the right to hold that title, according to the current rules in the UK. Children of British princesses always hold the title of their father - if he has any. As it became more common for royals to marry commoners, men that married a princess but did not hold a title of their own where often offered a hereditary peerage by the monarch. The last man to accept such an offer was Anthony Armstrong-Jones, husband to Princess Margaret, who was created Earl of Snowdon following his wedding. Hence, their children are styled as the children of an Earl. The same offer was made to Mark Phillips when he married Princess Anne, but they declined. Therefore, their two children Peter and Zara do not hold any titles and simply use their fathers surname. The only case in which a female line descendant could hold a Prince/ss title would be if the monarch specifically gave that title to them. :)

    • @AmericanViscountess
      @AmericanViscountess 2 роки тому +1

      From my research, before he was titles Prince Consort he was known as King Consort as that is the title he wanted. The Countess of Essex is an example used - she was an American Heiress and I'm doing research on her. And yes, it is optional - Princess Anne had the option (if granted by The Queen) to use these titles for her 2 children. :-)

  • @duangchitphanchamfar6893
    @duangchitphanchamfar6893 5 місяців тому

    Great I would love to learn more about the royal titles

  • @123canadagirl
    @123canadagirl 5 місяців тому +1

    I always get confused after Duke and earl. That’s really nice that your father in law is in the House of Lords.

  • @bethmahoney2233
    @bethmahoney2233 2 роки тому

    I love your channel! Being a Lexington, Kentucky native, I probably got my fascination with the British royal family, titles, and so on when the Queen, God rest her soul, made visits to our fair countryside to visit her racehorses. I’d love to hear more about titles and what each means. For example, what resources and responsibilities come with a title?

  • @stephb200
    @stephb200 7 місяців тому

    Thank you. Clear and concise.

  • @pedrosalinas3715
    @pedrosalinas3715 5 місяців тому

    Thank you very much Viscountess, it has been very interesting and in a few minutes you taught us in an easy way the British titles. I really wish your fellow American who is married to Prince Harry had your respect for the British Monarchy.

  • @patriciabaughn4749
    @patriciabaughn4749 2 роки тому +1

    Very interesting and difficult to keep track of. I do however believe that Queen Victoria gave her husband the title of Prince Consort and not King Consort once she was crowned Queen.

    • @AmericanViscountess
      @AmericanViscountess 2 роки тому

      17 years after she was made Queen, he became Prince Consort but prior to that he and she wanted him to be King Consort

  • @susenjarvis8281
    @susenjarvis8281 2 роки тому +1

    Very nice, very understanding.

  • @MelissamarieR
    @MelissamarieR Рік тому

    Lady Hinchingbrooke, its been brought to my attention that here in America , if your surname ( maiden name) is a locational name from England then its likely you are related to someone who held a title. Being a history buff and a very very curious person , I must know if my Maiden name Barnstable has anything to do with a previous Earl? My Great Aunt believed it did as she did some ancestry research however she passed away before we sat down and got into the details and her children now have all of that research and I do not speak much with them. I am not sure how to go about researching my family history past my grandparents? I would love some advice?

  • @baronvg
    @baronvg 2 роки тому

    Woah, I actually learned something. Not the meanings of all the titles (I already knew that) but that the Earl of Sandwich brought Charles II back to England. Everyone just knows him as the inventor of the sandwich helping restore the monarchy is way more important.

  • @pal7252
    @pal7252 2 роки тому +1

    This was excellent. This was very educational. 🤔 Hmmmmm who can I test. 😄 By the way love your blue dress. 💙

  • @Violinist265
    @Violinist265 2 роки тому +2

    Fascinating 👏🏻👏🏻

  • @hotwax9376
    @hotwax9376 2 роки тому

    IIRC, Prince Albert was never known as "king consort." Queen Victoria wanted him to have the title but it was ultimately rejected in favor of Prince Consort, which was also Prince Philip's title.

    • @AmericanViscountess
      @AmericanViscountess 2 роки тому

      Yes, he wanted to be known as King Consort

    • @hotwax9376
      @hotwax9376 2 роки тому +1

      @@AmericanViscountess He wanted to be but ultimately wasn't. You implied that he was.

    • @melodyclark1944
      @melodyclark1944 2 роки тому

      No, Philip was a prince consort, but not the Prince Consort like Victoria's husband. It wasn't his title.

    • @hotwax9376
      @hotwax9376 2 роки тому

      @@melodyclark1944 Thanks for clarifying. Albert, however, did have the title of Prince Consort. And I always wondered why Philip didn't have the title Prince Consort if that was his role. Was Duke of Edinburgh his only title?

    • @melodyclark1944
      @melodyclark1944 2 роки тому

      @@hotwax9376 That's what I meant. He was Albert, Prince Consort and the only one with that title. It was Prince Philip, duke of Edinburgh, earl of Merioneth and Baron Greenwich and a bunch of knighthoods and stuff

  • @kathyolney4083
    @kathyolney4083 2 роки тому +2

    Great explanation!! Thanks!!💫

  • @paulamatt614
    @paulamatt614 2 роки тому

    Love your video , it was very clear and you explained the content of the video very well.. Very interesting. I learnt something too , had no idea it was the first Earl Sandwich who brought King Charles second back to the throne of England. Thank you .,

  • @jimiweir923
    @jimiweir923 2 роки тому +3

    ❤️❤️❤️the American Viscountess
    educational interesting entertaining...
    puts our British Viscountess' to shame!
    thank you for sharing your home, family, lifestyle, experiences, opinions, knowledge, privilege, humour & style....
    ICON🇺🇲🇬🇧

  • @Familylawgroup
    @Familylawgroup Рік тому +3

    Here you area, twenty plus years as a Viscountess, and still learning about heraldry and titles and nobility. Yet, Duchess Meghan had less than three years to try to grasp the enormity of British aristocracy and was “bashed” in the press when she made mistakes. As an American, you know that we aren’t taught these topics. I looked at my son’s history books, when he was in high school in 2010-2011, and there was less than a page explaining topics such as heraldry. Thank you for taking the time to teach those of us who want to know more and learn bewt via videos.

  • @mattnbin
    @mattnbin 4 місяці тому

    I see the lapel mic on the Vicountess, but in editing it appears that the sound source chosen is the camera microphone.

  • @roziemartinez6705
    @roziemartinez6705 3 місяці тому

    Hi! Do you get invitations for any activities from Their Majesties? Dinners, the coronation etc?

  • @SSSSongbird
    @SSSSongbird 2 роки тому +2

    Hello, Viscountess Henchingbrook, may I call you Julie? I was just curious, Even as an American I'm pretty well versed in the way titles work however, my question is, why is Sophie the Countess of Wessex and Edward Earl of Wessex instead of Count of Wessex? That one has always baffled me a bit. Thank you for the information and your wonderful videos. I enjoy them immensely. Have a wonderful day! Sincerely, Stacey S, Kansas USA.

    • @AmericanViscountess
      @AmericanViscountess 2 роки тому +4

      Hi! And yes in Europe it would be Count and Countess. In the English nobility the title Earl developed as an equivalent to the title of Count. Hope that helps!

    • @SSSSongbird
      @SSSSongbird 2 роки тому +1

      @@AmericanViscountess oh. Thank you so much for the clarification. Because I've heard both I was a bit confused. 💐💖

    • @BlissfulDee
      @BlissfulDee 2 роки тому +2

      Earl is the British equivalent of Count in Europe, and Countess is the female equivalent of Earl in the UK. Have you ever watched Downton Abbey? The main characters are the Earl of Grantham and his wife, the Countess of Grantham.

    • @SSSSongbird
      @SSSSongbird 2 роки тому

      @@BlissfulDee yes, that's what Julie just said. Thank you for the help. And no, that's one of the few I haven't seen. But my mom and sister love that show, and the movie.

    • @livingthegoodlifechannel
      @livingthegoodlifechannel 2 роки тому

      I believe that the tradition in England for using "Earl" instead of countess derives from the Scandanavian/Viking word "Jarl".

  • @evelindelee849
    @evelindelee849 Рік тому

    Thank you🎉I like your videos 🎉

  • @jeffreybischoff6772
    @jeffreybischoff6772 2 роки тому +1

    Do you still have your US citizenship, like dual citizenship, or did you renounce your American citizenship and just have British citizenship to have the title?

  • @kathyokinaga9888
    @kathyokinaga9888 5 місяців тому

    I love these shorter videos

  • @howardboyer9092
    @howardboyer9092 2 роки тому

    Well Julie if you remember in USA we do have titles " Burger King" the king of Burgers

  • @jasonblack4208
    @jasonblack4208 10 місяців тому

    What I like the most about this video is that you don't do the typical American trying sound/act more European in order to be classy. You are straightforwardly a classy American, rather than pretending to be something else. 90% of class is about simple-but-quality tastes, good manners, and either demonstrating a real understanding of the topic being discussed, or a genuine interest in learning from the other person if you don't (being well-educated is more of a bi-product of being classy, rather than the cause of it). The fancy ceremonies that most people associate with class are maybe 2% of it. Outside of that, "less is more" is typically the way to go. People mess things up when they try to hard and put on heirs to look impressive/sophisticated.

  • @patty7804
    @patty7804 2 роки тому +35

    What is your oldest sons title then? Are your in laws invited to King Charles coronation? Do they have coronation gowns and crowns? Do you get to go? Who makes the coronation robes? Are the peers preparing now? Has William ever worn a crown in public? He will wear one when his father is crowned correct?

    • @Elvertaw
      @Elvertaw 2 роки тому +11

      I believe her son may have the third curtesy title or may be styled The Honorable

    • @peadar-o
      @peadar-o 2 роки тому +12

      Invitation/ attendance to a coronation depends on available space, order of precedence of the title’s creation (peerages of England, Scotland and NI before created for GB or UK), and for the main title holder and consort. Royal and non-royal dukes and other peers and peeresses wear coronets and their ceremonial robes at a coronation, and they are also distinguishable by rank (highest being dukedoms, and lowest baron, though for Scotland baronies and lordships are different as before the union a Scottish baron was created for attendance of the Scottish parliament and a lord (equal to baron in England) was feudal. If the new P of W gets an investiture, he will, if memory serves me correctly, wear a coronet. In the UK it’s usually only the ladies (princesses, peeresses etc.) who wear tiaras in public, but rules for wearing tiaras differ from country to country. In the UK only (unmarried) women of sufficient rank (royal princesses), married women (also widows), can wear them at applicable functions. The Viscountess Hinchingbrooke’s eldest son can use the second subsidiary title of baron Montagu, but doesn’t, and as such is then styled as the Honourable William Montagu, but when his father inherits the earldom, he will then be Viscount Hinchingbrooke, and his younger brother will remain an ‘Hon’, though remains in the succession line to the titles, but above his uncle (the current viscount’s younger brother).

    • @rwboa22
      @rwboa22 Рік тому +1

      @@Elvertaw it would normally be the second subsidiary title (being Baron Montagu), however under the Letters Patent when the Earldom was created, the grandson lawfully begotten is titled only as "The Hon." When the current (11th) Earl of Sandwich passes, the American Viscountess will then become Countess of Sandwich (as an Earl in England and Wales is the equivalent to a Count in Continental Europe), while the oldest grandson of the current Earl of Sandwich will become Viscount Hinchingbrooke.

  • @helloworld0911
    @helloworld0911 2 роки тому +1

    Correction here... children of princesses are not given any princely titles.

  • @jeannelynskey6946
    @jeannelynskey6946 2 роки тому +2

    Do we know why they still refer to Prince Andrew as the Duke of York? I thought the Duke of York was the second oldest son of the monarch, so now it would be Harry. By the way, Viscountess Hinchingbrooke is the coolest title I've ever heard!

    • @lonesomevalkyrie
      @lonesomevalkyrie 2 роки тому +5

      They hold the title for life and are hereditary. They will always be Duke of York and Duke of Sussex. The next Duke of York would likely be Prince Louis as Prince Andrew only had daughters. The next Duke of Sussex while be his son Archie.

    • @melodyclark1944
      @melodyclark1944 2 роки тому +2

      It is tradition if the title Duke of York is available it goes to the second son who keeps it for life and then it passes on to his son. If they don't change the law so Princess Beatrice can inherit it then it will likely next be given to Prince Louis after William is king and then it would pass on to Louis's son.

    • @panda5122
      @panda5122 2 роки тому +2

      He is Prince Andrew because he was the sovereign's child, i.e., a prince. Until he got married, his title was "His Royal Highness The Prince Andrew". When he got married, he was made the Duke of York, and his title became "His Royal Highness The Duke of York". People use Prince Andrew and Duke of York interchangeably. Or sometimes "Prince Andrew, Duke of York." Peerages are given, not automatic. Traditionally, the second son of the monarch is given the title Duke of York, but it is not guaranteed or automatic.

  • @t.grimes9973
    @t.grimes9973 2 роки тому

    I can see that others have already pointed out that Prince Albert was a Prince Consort, never King Consort. Also male-line great-grandchild of the monarch are not automatically a princes, as your chart seems to imply. As you said, exceptions were made in the case of Prince William's children. Otherwise, very informative; thanks for posting!

    • @AmericanViscountess
      @AmericanViscountess 2 роки тому

      yes he was officially known as Prince Consort 17 years later but wanted to be known as King Consort and from my research was known as that until the official title of Prince Consort.

  • @EAlyahya
    @EAlyahya 2 роки тому

    I’ve just come across with this interesting channel. Are you related to HRH Princess Alice, Duchess of Gloucester? As she was from the House of Montagu as well.

  • @Grail434
    @Grail434 Рік тому

    sorry to disturb you but i have a question to ask: if a woman that becomes queen through marriage already has a daughter would her being appointed princess absolutely require her to be married to a prince or are there other ways for her to be appointed and can she be named princess by virtue of her mother's marriage to the king?

    • @berneserainbow1407
      @berneserainbow1407 5 місяців тому

      The daughter would not be styled Princess even upon marriage of her mother as she is not the daughter of the monarch. See also as an example Marius Borg Høiby, who is the son of Mette-Marit Tjessem Høiby, now Crownprincess of Norway. He was never made prince as his father is not part of the royal family.
      If she marries a prince, she is technically just the wife of a prince, which does not make her a princess in her own right. She will share the title of her husband as seen in HRH Princess Michael of Kent. (Prince Michael of Kent is a cousin of the late Queen).

  • @PRGuy1335
    @PRGuy1335 5 місяців тому

    I’m distantly related to your husband I’m a descendant of William Montagu, 1st Earl of Salisbury