remember, not all linux users are "techie" in a ways they know what to replace something with for thier use, hence the hard dependencies. these "bloat" were not intended to be normally separate, even if you dont need it. (see there, "normally")
The nice thing of telescope is that you can fuzzy find more that just files, you can fuzzy find grep results, neovim help menus, your own keymaps, open buffers, etc, and you can extend it too, I made a neovim extension to change between some recurrent projects using telescope and tmux
01:20 re: “Random web browser” Unless they’re using a browser that is itself Chromium based, I’m not sure that the KDE project should be developing or maintaining another whole web browser suite at this point in time. Modern browsers have the same level of, if not more, complexity as an OS kernel. They should let the other respective foundations focus on that.
Well, WebKit is a fork of KHTML (and Chrome a fork of WebKit). But yeah, at this point web browsers engines got too complex to just have your own one on the side.
@@bloody_albatross I doubt Apple or Google are making upstream commits to KHTML these days. It would make about as much sense for the KDE Foundation to maintain their own forked version of a Linux 4.0 era Kernel or earlier! They should make Konqueror just be Chromium with a QT skin.
remember, not all linux users are "techie" in a ways they know what to replace something with for thier use, hence the hard dependencies. these "bloat" were not intended to be normally separate, even if you dont need it. (see there, "normally")
The nice thing of telescope is that you can fuzzy find more that just files, you can fuzzy find grep results, neovim help menus, your own keymaps, open buffers, etc, and you can extend it too, I made a neovim extension to change between some recurrent projects using telescope and tmux
I want to know more about those browser bookmarks you mentioned
01:20 re: “Random web browser” Unless they’re using a browser that is itself Chromium based, I’m not sure that the KDE project should be developing or maintaining another whole web browser suite at this point in time. Modern browsers have the same level of, if not more, complexity as an OS kernel. They should let the other respective foundations focus on that.
kde web browser is konqueror
seems like old chromium
not good as web browser, I use it as man page viewer (url "man:pread")
Well, WebKit is a fork of KHTML (and Chrome a fork of WebKit). But yeah, at this point web browsers engines got too complex to just have your own one on the side.
@@bloody_albatross I doubt Apple or Google are making upstream commits to KHTML these days. It would make about as much sense for the KDE Foundation to maintain their own forked version of a Linux 4.0 era Kernel or earlier! They should make Konqueror just be Chromium with a QT skin.
This really guy sees bloat everywhere
I was wondering what application launcher you were using lately Brody, thanks for the tofi mention
Thunderbird is a bloat for me in Pop!_OS. I never liked any mail client on Linux. Hopefully we'll have a mail client for COSMIC in future
computers are fast! Bloat is OK in moderation
What the f are you talking about. Bloat is never OK. Don't make it a norm