An ENORMOUS Ekranoplan and much more! | Flyout community designs Ep.4!

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 4 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 97

  • @botstowo
    @botstowo 10 місяців тому +139

    Yoooo! I made the CD V-B-61! That's so cool to see it in the video! I see you discovered why it has the wing tip landing gear!
    Edit: Oh lord! I forgot to add brakes!

    • @bl4cksp1d3r
      @bl4cksp1d3r 10 місяців тому +30

      Somehow this fits to the postapocalyptic description xD
      "Huh, I forgot to consider how to stop...."

    • @nmspy
      @nmspy 10 місяців тому +12

      @@bl4cksp1d3r”oh shit he actually made it back oh that doesn’t bode well”

    • @drmini7522
      @drmini7522 10 місяців тому

      hmm "cock door"

    • @AVJordanyt
      @AVJordanyt 4 місяці тому +2

      I love that you added the CAP logo. Good to know they're still around even after the apocalypse

    • @pranavghantasala6808
      @pranavghantasala6808 2 місяці тому

      @@nmspy "You actually survived! You're back!"
      "I can't believe it either! Now how do I stop this thing?"
      "…I don't know. I didn't actually think you'd get this far."

  • @xXManhattanProjectXx
    @xXManhattanProjectXx 10 місяців тому +70

    Thi jiggling from the X-02S is probably due to the Hydraulic pressure in the engine or lack thereof

    • @imnotoriginal2481
      @imnotoriginal2481 10 місяців тому +4

      Or... a feedback loop

    • @xXManhattanProjectXx
      @xXManhattanProjectXx 10 місяців тому +21

      @@imnotoriginal2481 both actually lol. Just tried it out myself, pumped up its hydraulic pressure and fiddled with the Fly-by-wire. Alleviated it somewhat so it's wiggling only starts at high dynamic pressures. So mach 1.6 at low altitudes and ~2.6 at high altitudes

    • @nßultz1440
      @nßultz1440 8 місяців тому +1

      @@xXManhattanProjectXx the hydraulic pumps give the rudders power? i couldn't find any info on tuning utility drive, or what they do, everything seems to work with both at 0

  • @jamescarranza420
    @jamescarranza420 10 місяців тому +37

    The jagged edges on panels is called saw tooth it's designed to negate the amount of reflection from radar

  • @jocax188723
    @jocax188723 10 місяців тому +13

    Ace Combat doesn't mess around with its Original Aircraft series.
    From ADF to Delphinus, PAce's designers take no quarter.

  • @leemiles3995
    @leemiles3995 10 місяців тому +34

    Some really good builds here, I love the ekranoplan, might have a think about making a ground effect fighter for a future submission.
    Thanks for flying my F7 Switchblade btw!

    • @meanmotherstuka6630
      @meanmotherstuka6630 10 місяців тому +1

      You might have to get creative with the manoeuvrability, you can typically only experience ground effect at half a wingspans altitude so aggressively rolling to turn isn’t really an option. You could go for a gunboat-esque turret fighter?

    • @leemiles3995
      @leemiles3995 10 місяців тому +1

      @@meanmotherstuka6630 sounds pretty cool tbh, i was thinking of doing something which used the ground effect to build up lots of speed, and make some sort of interceptor, either way i'm not going to make it for a while, as i am quite busy building my Kalinin K-7, and its parasite fighter rn

    • @zilchoward4764
      @zilchoward4764 10 місяців тому

      @@meanmotherstuka6630 or give a bank angle just to cockpit, a rolling cockpit!😍

    • @Reliant_Robin
      @Reliant_Robin 4 місяці тому

      @@zilchoward4764 how would that work

    • @zilchoward4764
      @zilchoward4764 4 місяці тому

      @@Reliant_Robin Yaw manoeuver can be as powerful as the pitch when having a big vertical stabilizer. However, the pilot needs to withstand sideway G force, so a rotating cockpit can provide a positive G force for the pilot :P

  • @Jaqoum_The_Wizard_King
    @Jaqoum_The_Wizard_King 10 місяців тому +5

    So, writer here, there are a few ways to choose a tag. You can
    -just grab a random word that has a nice ring to it and roll with that
    -pick a tag either way some significance to you personally
    -grab a bunch ‘a’ letters you like and throw ‘em in an anagram scrambler
    What matters most about it is that you gel with it, and that you like writing it

  • @Dan-jf3pc
    @Dan-jf3pc 10 місяців тому +20

    Once again getting blown away by Ace Combat super fighter will have to see you react to all the fictional aircraft from the games, there are some really good designs

    • @anzaca1
      @anzaca1 6 місяців тому +4

      Apparently all of AC's super fighters are viable designs i.e. they WOULD fly if built.

    • @mndlessdrwer
      @mndlessdrwer 3 місяці тому +1

      @@anzaca1 They might be impossibly difficult to fly without the use of fly-by-wire augmented control schemes, but they COULD fly if built, which is an impressive level of immersion for such a game and I appreciate it.

  • @theravenousrabbit3671
    @theravenousrabbit3671 2 місяці тому +2

    You are curious why the wings seem to pull towards the ground; prop planes will have the rotors spinning in a certain direction, which tilts the plane in that same direction due to the rotational force.

  • @Karagianis
    @Karagianis 9 місяців тому +1

    16:14 It was just called the KM (Korabl Maket) by the USSR.

  • @TheUtahKogers
    @TheUtahKogers 10 місяців тому +2

    the ekranoplan one was misnamed as that was a theoretical design from a russian aeronautical engineer while the ekranoplans were designed by a ship builder and the one in this video was actually designed to be a super fast aircraft carier

  • @Bob78
    @Bob78 10 місяців тому +12

    I love ekranoplans, thanks for including one. I might build one myself.

    • @wynandviljoen2205
      @wynandviljoen2205 8 місяців тому

      What is the advantage of an ekranoplane as opposed to conventional craft?

    • @Bob78
      @Bob78 8 місяців тому

      @@wynandviljoen2205 There isn't much of an advantage but they look cool.
      One advantage however, is that unlike planes, ekranoplans have no wingtip vortices so they have less drag whilst flying.

    • @TinyBearTim
      @TinyBearTim 8 місяців тому

      @@wynandviljoen2205can function like a boat but at speeds of a plane with decent carrying weight

    • @LavaDa1shi
      @LavaDa1shi 5 місяців тому

      @@wynandviljoen2205 iirc the whole point is to be more of a addition to the navy not a replacement for aircraft or a addition to the airforce, this is because it needed a flat surface like the water, and it could not go to anywhere near the altitude a conventional craft could. and the larger it got the more stable it was so it would have to be very large to make it useful and would be best used as a warship.
      iirc it would be relatively save from mines and torpedoes because it can fly over the surface instead of going in the water. and it would be able to go much faster then a conventional warship.

  • @HwE-ic7tp
    @HwE-ic7tp 10 місяців тому +11

    Glad my craft made it to the video. Awesome!

  • @exio_exio1234
    @exio_exio1234 10 місяців тому +8

    they should add cockdoor to every plane

  • @acecombat2shill
    @acecombat2shill 10 місяців тому +2

    21:58 do it do it do it do it do it do it do it do it do it do it do it do it do it do it do it do it do it do it

  • @thehobo00
    @thehobo00 10 місяців тому +7

    Kinda wish you tried to do a top speed test with the X-02S even with the jiggling. Also, maybe make yourself a checklist for every plane so that you remember to show the cockpit, do top speed tests, etc. Otherwise great job!

  • @darrinwatts3419
    @darrinwatts3419 5 днів тому +1

    The Ekranoplan was cool. Kve been playing X Plane for years and tried to design these, but it doesn't model ground effect well enough. Nice to see a program that can. 👍

  • @novathetoasterboi
    @novathetoasterboi 10 місяців тому +3

    The F7 switchblade looks like a dragonfly

  • @rexgaming1113
    @rexgaming1113 10 місяців тому +1

    So happy to see that there’s a series now nice video patch bits keep up the great work

  • @W0B0N
    @W0B0N 10 місяців тому +1

    Entertaining video as always! You have a good format.

  • @Cj363
    @Cj363 26 днів тому +1

    I think the jiggle on the strike wyvern came from the flaps still being at 25%

  • @jamesleonard98
    @jamesleonard98 10 місяців тому +2

    Keep the community videos coming!

  • @squirreltamer2548
    @squirreltamer2548 9 місяців тому +1

    7:01 World War II design wings were not suitable for transonic to supersonic speed. Even before the sound threshold, most planes of that era couldn’t even exceed 400 mph without having the control surfaces Locking up. A prime example of this wing design phenomenon are the early models of the P 38 lightning. Where in a dive, the control surfaces on the wings of the P 38 locked up, causing a fatal nosedive.

  • @subjectc7505
    @subjectc7505 10 місяців тому +1

    A supersonic airliner would be a good episode

  • @Amelia-mq6hm
    @Amelia-mq6hm 10 місяців тому +4

    Ah the problem you had in the beginning seems to be some wrong calculation with the ground effect interaction in the newest version of the game, multiple people have noticed it

  • @shinobi_o_o___
    @shinobi_o_o___ 10 місяців тому

    really cool to see this stuff in the discord then watch them be flown by the man himself

  • @rebel6301
    @rebel6301 10 місяців тому +1

    wow, that x-02s was really cool

  • @GerinoMorn
    @GerinoMorn 9 місяців тому +1

    Listen. Listen. Ground effect carrier. Speed up toward the operation zone giving the planes a huge initial speed, so they can carry more ordnance instead of burning fuel for start. Also no need to play with catapults etc., planes can take off much faster! :D

    • @Camilo_Z
      @Camilo_Z 9 місяців тому

      Now that is cool

    • @mndlessdrwer
      @mndlessdrwer 3 місяці тому

      Would probably work most conveniently with a series of hydrofoils to lift the ship out of the water as opposed to actually giving the thing enough thrust to utilize the ground effect cushion. Either way would still require a ton of thrust in one form or another, though.

  • @wulfleyn6498
    @wulfleyn6498 10 місяців тому

    You can press v twice and then c to have a follow camera further away while in mouse aim flight.

  • @rowanelse4669
    @rowanelse4669 10 місяців тому +13

    i bet you patchbits that you did not read this

    • @PatchBits
      @PatchBits  10 місяців тому +13

      Ok!

    • @SevSymbol
      @SevSymbol 10 місяців тому +1

      Damn G, you got him to read it

  • @CarnotaurusEnjoyer
    @CarnotaurusEnjoyer 10 місяців тому

    that giant ekranoplan was actually a concept by beriev but well... the soviet union kinda collapsed when they made the design

  • @guntherweiss
    @guntherweiss 10 місяців тому

    Oooohh, seeing that Ekranoplan has me wanting to see the one in Eighty-Six built in the game! (The XC-1 Nachzehrer )

  • @xXManhattanProjectXx
    @xXManhattanProjectXx 7 місяців тому +1

    If you haven't already, I believe your jiggling issues are probably due to your Physics Update Rate. Might be set too low for certain designs

  • @LegionHd2
    @LegionHd2 9 місяців тому

    I imagine the ground effect aircraft be a pretty good alternative to a flying aircraft carrier because of its high-speed and high weight capacity

  • @KOZMOuvBORG
    @KOZMOuvBORG 9 місяців тому

    22:52 you have an oscillation .

  • @timothylang741
    @timothylang741 10 місяців тому +2

    I think it would be cool if you did a collab with eta320

  • @arfazero1
    @arfazero1 9 місяців тому

    that would totaly fly real life wings would work ive seen a lawn mower fly and a shopping trolly x wing should work just fine

  • @td23asus
    @td23asus 10 місяців тому

    You should really do these reviews for Sprocket too. Lots of awesome designs on the official server blueprint channel for example

  • @anthonybonawitz444
    @anthonybonawitz444 2 місяці тому

    If this game has anything close to actual physics you need to be at altitude to get your speed records.
    20 to 35,000 ft.

  • @HowIsAsh
    @HowIsAsh 10 місяців тому

    The ekranoplan was a real idea by Bartini

  • @hazethedeer2588
    @hazethedeer2588 10 місяців тому +1

    Hey Patch i have a question, how difficult is it to get the hang of designing in Flyout?

  • @pow33.
    @pow33. 10 місяців тому +7

    ill do 5 push ups for every like

    • @PatchBits
      @PatchBits  10 місяців тому +1

      670 reps stat

  • @tomarmadiyer2698
    @tomarmadiyer2698 10 місяців тому +1

    EKRANOPLANE!!!!

  • @warrobotsfan6625
    @warrobotsfan6625 10 місяців тому +1

    Guys i have a camera problem in flyout that i cant see my plane when spawned in, can anyone help me?

  • @mndlessdrwer
    @mndlessdrwer 3 місяці тому

    Might be time to consider trying to upgrade your PC to something with a better GPU and more processing cores. Poor thing got done in by a flying bus.
    That mach 3 concorde-esque plane would definitely be problematic to create IRL without the use of ceramic composite exterior panels, potentially painted with a heat dissipative ceramic coating to prevent the plane from trying to melt any aluminum panels on the leading edge. I guess you could always try making it out of titanium on the leading edges, but it would still be monstrously difficult to work around the friction heating conundrum for a reusable craft that's meant to fly more often than a space shuttle. The shuttle and other re-entry craft are designed to make good use of ablative panels to literally burn off the heat of air resistance.
    Editing again to add more info: that Ace Combat plane would need to have some very complicated inner intake control vanes to compensate for the intake design that isn't stepped off of the body of the plane. You know how basically every fighter aircraft in production these days has their intake set off at least 10cm from the body of the plane? It's really prominent on the F-16 with its massive intake. That is done to prevent the low-speed laminar air that sticks to the body of the craft from entering the intakes because air of wildly different velocities entering the intake has the effect of stressing the turbine blades unevenly and causes engines to fail catastrophically. It's also one of the reasons why the leading edges of the air intakes are designed to create break points for sonic booms in order to prevent supersonic air from entering the engine, as that can also cause severely accelerated rates of fatigue for the internal engine components. That's just my low-level understanding of the physics behind these design theories Also, preventing those sonic booms from entering the engine is also why the cones on the SR-71's engines are able to move back and forth, at least until the plane reaches the necessary velocity to engage the jet engine bypass mode to enter ramjet mode. It also has some very convoluted intake vent geometry adjustments, various bypass vents and exhaust cooling/mixing vents. The SR-71 is still an amazing craft to study because they managed to create a system that allows the craft to function fairly normally as a conventional low-bypass turbofan jet engine with a conventional afterburner until the speed is met, then the channels leading to the jet engine get closed off and basically all intake air gets shunted into the bypass channel and into the ramjet combustion chamber, which is why the cone gets retracted above mach 2.5: they need as much air as they can get to ram into that compression and combustion chamber and they no longer need to worry about supersonic air damaging the internal components since the ramjet stage has no moving parts and functions solely by the forward velocity of the craft allowing it to squeeze the intake air to an acceptable density for spontaneous combustion upon fuel injection.

  • @Amelia-mq6hm
    @Amelia-mq6hm 10 місяців тому +2

    I am here earlier than early

    • @rowanelse4669
      @rowanelse4669 10 місяців тому +2

      yes you are

    • @roaling2
      @roaling2 10 місяців тому

      Dont care

    • @Amelia-mq6hm
      @Amelia-mq6hm 10 місяців тому

      @@roaling2 you cared enough to comment

    • @roaling2
      @roaling2 10 місяців тому

      @@Amelia-mq6hm sure, but no one cares that you're baiting likes

  • @mads.m1213
    @mads.m1213 10 місяців тому

    Please make a huge bomber

  • @epytomeproductionz7571
    @epytomeproductionz7571 7 місяців тому

    How do you restart the engine after turning it off like that ?

  • @James-9999
    @James-9999 10 місяців тому

    A world with no runways😂

  • @kevinkurz4749
    @kevinkurz4749 10 місяців тому

    How do you get bombs in flyout?

    • @PatchBits
      @PatchBits  10 місяців тому

      Currently they're custom models, not actual in game parts.

  • @juliusalacar09
    @juliusalacar09 2 місяці тому

    ACE COMBAT IS THE BEST

  • @exio_exio1234
    @exio_exio1234 10 місяців тому

    purple

  • @Sallsag
    @Sallsag 10 місяців тому

    I don't know what to say

  • @nicsnotafox4618
    @nicsnotafox4618 10 місяців тому +2

    I think I just killed you in War Thunder

  • @Yoitscaivaxthemolotovfox
    @Yoitscaivaxthemolotovfox 10 місяців тому +1

    Helloo

  • @Captain_Echo
    @Captain_Echo 10 місяців тому

    Hi :D

  • @Colesmat
    @Colesmat 10 місяців тому

    The first one is supposed to be a civil air patrol aircraft

  • @roaling2
    @roaling2 10 місяців тому +1

    Please play crossout will 🥺
    I will subscribe if you do