China has been doing exactly what the professor is suggesting. US has been dropped from China's biggest trading partner to No. 3 this year. China become the world's biggest car exporter virtually without the need of the American market.
US may be reducing direct import from China but is increasing import from countries like Mexico, Vietnam etc where the final product are actually assembled mainly from Chinese components. So it is just only self deception and the US still buying from China 😂😂😂.
Indeed, those countries that borrowed from the World Bank and IMF took the loans in USD and ultimately are at the mercy of the rapid interest fluctuation caused by the US policy.
politically non-biased Americans are rare. Logically and politically non-biased Americans are really rare. People like Jeffrey Sachs are the hope of Americans. Strategic and ruthless is majority part of political gene of British. Cowboy aggression is added to their gene in the States, but not in Canada. World peace is a dream, which is hardly coming true. Buckle up and stay safe.
After all sanctions imposed. China had already excluded the US and allies in the future trading. Why should China change courses that was driven by the US? Unreasonable request!
Reflect: Thanks 香港01 for sharing the topic. Indeed U.S-China relations have come to the table that both are sharing equal "common interest". By observing Israel-Hamas war situation, we know that NATO and BRICS are no longer competitors. NATO supports Democracy, whereas BRICS supports Dictatorship. Both NATO and BRICS have their own Oil Supplier and Military Business target market. Pray Hard! 🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻
Correction- NATO supports COLONIALISM. WHITE SUPREMACY and EXPLOITATION The BRICS supports mutual respect amount sovereign nations and mutual interests
I think it was a big mistake for China to antagonize India at the LAC. I would say if India was truly on board with China, Russia, SA, etc then the US and the West would be in big trouble. But with India slowly but surely moving into the US orbit, its hard to say now. That may have saved the West.
It’s not China antagonizing India at LAC, but exactly the reverse. India always expects others to not antagonize it while it does everything it wanted. To expect Indi to be “fully onboard” by anyone is a futile exercise. If the west wants India, it’s actually a blessing in disguise for China.
@@xsu-is7vq Indeed for the US having India in its orbit is an important factor and makes things more interesting. The US has correctly identified that only India has the ability to work as the counterweight.
@Milked You have displayed an ignorance in history India is the one that has been consistently antagonistic to China. Why? India has aspired to be the king of Asia as well as the entire global South since day one of its independence. Read the inaugural speech of its founding father. It has not taken the rise of China well. The Anglo Saxons , as per usual ,is taking advantage of the rivalry.
❤Let me put it straight, l never fear China and their success on communism practise. because although I can never be As good/altruistic as a chinese Communist, as a Normal selfish person who pretty much enjoy living by my work, Loving my family and the world and caring only for those i feel responsible for. i reasonably admire their genuine altruism intension for all classes of their people, matureness of their governance and recent decades of economical growth, they still had huge richest versus poor gap however they were able to get rid of extremely poor and every human in their country are able to work and earn a life that worth living. simple moral tells me, i am not those rich people can only rely on nonproductive financial games, robbery, colonizing, prosecution, invasion, bombarding and all kinds of strong predator weak meat war crime to get money and power, nor i care to be those racist who were so pathetic to watching people dog fighting for fun, every good soul on earth shall never fear or jealous of China's peaceful progress as long awaited evolution of human civilization.
He is one of the American with conscience and cares about world peace, but there’s no space for him in current USA politics situation.
He is an apologist for the Communist China. For Sachs, China could do no wrong. He said the real estate problem is not a big one. LET"S SEE, LOL
@@Hina749
Stupid !!
Obviously you are a strong believer of the bully mentality, and very little knowledge about the human history, let’s see how far you can go! @Hina749
There's no place for righteous people in US anymore.
💪💪💪👍👍👍🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳
I thought the American needs more of these people to save them.
Speaking the truth
中國人做生意有幾千年的歷史經驗。在這二、三十年里中國早已看透西方人的所作所為，發展非洲經濟、一路一帶就是很好的經驗之一。進可攻、防可守，中國的經濟是面向世界每一角落，絕不求單一市場、單一區域，就是訪止西方國家群歐制裁，中國人是一個聰明民族。
China has been doing exactly what the professor is suggesting. US has been dropped from China's biggest trading partner to No. 3 this year. China become the world's biggest car exporter virtually without the need of the American market.
US may be reducing direct import from China but is increasing import from countries like Mexico, Vietnam etc where the final product are actually assembled mainly from Chinese components. So it is just only self deception and the US still buying from China 😂😂😂.
不。中国需要任何市场。并保持开放的的竞争精神。因为傲慢闭关锁国让这国家走向了前所未有的衰败。这是血泪的教训。
@@ganzhishijie👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍讚...........！
國師級別的學者👍
尊敬你有良知
❤❤❤
A real scholar, for the world. Admire!
👍👍👍❤❤❤
老派学者，温文尔雅。他是真正的和平者，善于倾听。
Excellent
I support professor Sachs. He said the truth.
❤❤❤
說事實的美國人
美國是很勵害的對手!他能致敵人於死地!也能向敵人請求幫忙?這是什麼原則?中國人是辦不到的向敵人妥協和請求協助!
有很多收获。感谢。
少有的美國專家願意講真話及批評美國！ 教授, 請小心被消失！
美國遵守言論自由。。。唔完全係，限制流量，CIA搵你飲茶😊所以話言論自由根本就係一個謊言呢個世界點會有啊
这么了解苏联国情的人，老美的宝贝。
邊個有自由，邊個冇自由。大家心裡有數
人家住纽约30多年了需要你教
識別「小心」同「教」！ 叫你小心過馬路不等於教你過馬路！
Indeed, those countries that borrowed from the World Bank and IMF took the loans in USD and ultimately are at the mercy of the rapid interest fluctuation caused by the US policy.
有遠見的學者
👍Honest and tell the fact
看輕別人的悲哀，尤其是種族之間！
Very normal!!!
若是有一天，中國取代美國成為世界第一大國，相信這位學者也能欣然接受，因為他認為世界共榮，但並不是每個人都能這樣想的。
Good to hear to a foreigner speaking the truth and giving good advive to China. ❤❤❤❤❤
Jeffrey Sachs is an American Economist and a Professor at Columbia University ❤️❤️❤️👍👍👍
Jeffrey Sachs is American.
No, Professor Sachs is a conscientious American.
The only thing China will do, not should do, is being good and better herself, as before and always.
智者不分國界。
他絕對不是智者。只是為了面子死撐而已。
Please invite him to HK university
無用，任何唔反中，鬼佬都被講成收咗錢
👍👍👍🎉🎉🎉
politically non-biased Americans are rare. Logically and politically non-biased Americans are really rare. People like Jeffrey Sachs are the hope of Americans.
Strategic and ruthless is majority part of political gene of British. Cowboy aggression is added to their gene in the States, but not in Canada.
World peace is a dream, which is hardly coming true. Buckle up and stay safe.
👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍
💪💪💪👍👍👍🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳
薩克斯說對了兩件事：一，不一定是拜登和川普競選，拜登退選了。二，中國將電動車市場拓展到非洲。
理性的西方學者
希望歐美👂勸
❤😊😊😊😊
Such a honest and knowledgeable person!
如果殺人魔連任阿拉伯人不是更悽慘？
傲慢的美國 將會得到中國教訓好的回應
只看到結果卻不針對問題的核心問題談。貿易爭端只是果，問題是什麼？
問題
是政治制度之爭
是資源分配之爭
是基本普世價值觀及人權之歧見之爭
World Bank or US Bank?
所有人都在做實事，世界就只一個人還在做他的春秋大夢。
不管对的错的，不管是美国的傲慢还是什么，民主就是大多数人的想法，目前美国大多数人就觉得要对抗中国，这就是现实
His concept seemed common sense, but US politician are no common sense humans😅😅😅😅😅
Jeffrey 想做拾漏！哈哈！好彩佢唔係揸Fit 人。谢天谢地！❤️❤️❤️❤️
Use your native language to post.
Don’t pretend.
Your translation service sucks. Your post makes zero sense
你講乜鳩
@@Kllllllvvvvvvf13 下次我讲德文，方便你明白。
So who is paying the tariffs?😂
美国平民百姓付，美国政府收益啊😅
中國人民的老朋友
灣區博士
没有敌人的国家是很难稳定的
點解教授唔去選美國總統
Two sides of the same coin.
After all sanctions imposed. China had already excluded the US and allies in the future trading. Why should China change courses that was driven by the US?
Unreasonable request!
你轉行生產軍火就明白⋯⋯
他叫什麼名字？為什麼比我聰明那麼多？？
Professor Jeffrey Sachs 是少有支持正義的美國學者，但像他這類人在美國是罕有的
@@soha7271 他可不支持正义，这是个阴谋家，离他远点。
他是另一个谷愛凌😂
中國在經濟強勢的時候都沒有傲慢？
辱美了
我可以理解學者站在上帝的視角去看待事物，他們會提出他們認為最好最公平正義的看法，但國際社會畢竟是"人"的社會，如果以國際叢林的角度來看，中國也許更希望下一屆的美國總統，仍然是拜登或是特朗普。"如果你的敵人正在犯錯，千萬不要提醒他"，特朗普本質就是一個商人，拜登基本上就是一個失智老人，( 雖然我不懂美國三億多人口，怎麼最後就剩這兩人競爭總統大位?也許這就是"民主"奇蹟 )，特朗普跟拜登任內美國衰退的速度肉眼可見，站在中國的立場，這兩個人或許更不具威脅性，中國甚至找不到更糟糕的人來取代他們。如果美國選出一個"習近平"或是"普丁"，中國可能更危險。所以 Holy 拜登 ! 繼續連任吧 ! 對中國而言，那將是一份天上掉下來的大禮 !!
因為美國財團企業無法容忍像桑德斯那樣的左派社會主義者出來擔任美國總統
同意
好快有USA 同 USB
他有能来把$4 a gallon 抖 2 dollar 什么家家
More than $5 already!
這是美國專家還是中國專家？怎麼有一種熟悉的味道呢？
你连他都没听过吗？ 经济学泰斗级人物，有过成功也有过失败，香港是没有经济学者比他更好水平了😂
美国哥伦比亚大学教授，好像也在清华客座过，了解中国国情
@@PC.505 是不是那个休克疗法的老小子？现在来给中国开药方了？
@@MrMingsyin 他更了解苏联国情，还是让他离中国远点吧。
因為在西方世界講真話的已是另類，只有政治正確才能得到認可，我想你也跟霉國政客一樣的思維，所以你才有所懷疑。
Reflect: Thanks 香港01 for sharing the topic. Indeed U.S-China relations have come to the table that both are sharing equal "common interest". By observing Israel-Hamas war situation, we know that NATO and BRICS are no longer competitors. NATO supports Democracy, whereas BRICS supports Dictatorship. Both NATO and BRICS have their own Oil Supplier and Military Business target market. Pray Hard! 🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻
Correction-
NATO supports COLONIALISM. WHITE SUPREMACY and EXPLOITATION
The BRICS supports mutual respect amount sovereign nations and mutual interests
一個幻想出來的人，去做總統不合適。
习近平,想站著.马克龙,不想跪著
请再以圣经良知和国家力量人道精神，
拯救我们城市避街上的吸毒流浪者们！
我喜歡這個西人，很特別，總是別人的問題，自己呢，當然沒問題，完美得像聖人，厲害了的共產經濟專家
这老小子带着任务来的，老给中国开药方。
錯拉，侷係對自己嚴格對別人寬容。 問題可能係你自己呢？你以為自己係西人嗎？
How much money he got from China by far?
你個死樣同你做緊既野好相稱
這只是一個商業演講，內容觀點無所謂對或錯。只要你想買它就是對，你不想買它就是錯。
就是要聽聽這種人的意見，小粉紅小粉藍互咬的畫面實在太低級了。
这种人的意见还是算了吧，比金灿荣差远了。
@@adfasaddaa2410金燦榮什麼學歷！？ 他什麼學歷，你別挨罵了。
美國滅中國的心永遠都不會死的，中國人一早就知道，中國在剛剛建立自己的新國家時候，都沒有被美國滅掉，中國人自力更生，自信自强，全力發展經濟。中國人走自己的發展道路，不做一個强權的國家，做一個和平的國家。如果美國肝膽來侵犯，中國人也不會怕的。朋友來了有好酒，敵人來了迎接它的是獵槍！！！
Who built Ching Hwa university for the Chinese? Who brought China to WTO?
清華大學不是美國建立的吧！中國進入WTO是經過了十幾年的不斷努力，將中國的經濟@@tungtung8378 不斷更改去符合WTO的各種條例。都是靠自身的努力！！！
要脸吗你，清华的钱哪来的，WTO是中国有十亿人，有巨大利益和中国人的努力，有美国的妥协，但是并不是根本原因@@tungtung8378
@@tungtung8378所以美國政府可以不讓中國崛起？不讓中國人民有更好的生活？你咋不説説誰要用鴨片麻痹中國，怎不説説八國聯軍為什麼燒殺淫掠一個對世界無害的中國？
I think it was a big mistake for China to antagonize India at the LAC. I would say if India was truly on board with China, Russia, SA, etc then the US and the West would be in big trouble.
But with India slowly but surely moving into the US orbit, its hard to say now. That may have saved the West.
It’s not China antagonizing India at LAC, but exactly the reverse. India always expects others to not antagonize it while it does everything it wanted. To expect Indi to be “fully onboard” by anyone is a futile exercise. If the west wants India, it’s actually a blessing in disguise for China.
@@xsu-is7vq Indeed for the US having India in its orbit is an important factor and makes things more interesting. The US has correctly identified that only India has the ability to work as the counterweight.
@Milked
You have displayed an ignorance in history
India is the one that has been consistently antagonistic to China.
Why? India has aspired to be the king of Asia as well as the entire global South since day one of its independence. Read the inaugural speech of its founding father.
It has not taken the rise of China well.
The Anglo Saxons , as per usual ,is taking advantage of the rivalry.
大家應該都忘了中美裂痕的最初期是來自新冠肺炎，然後演變至今。
你昏睡了好多年了吧。
2008年后就开始了，你做了个什么梦😅
這個經濟學家一開口就說錯了。拜、川二人不是反華，而是反共。
事實上，美國不是怕中國强大，是怕共產黨强大。
從美國在過去幾十年不斷幫助中國經濟發展，就可以證明美國並不怕中國富裕强大。
從習近平的南海爭議開始，美國從川普起開始對中國實施經濟對抗，就可證明美國怕的是一個只講拳頭的共產黨太富有
越南不也是共产党强大的国家吗？只是越南还不是很强大而已吧！
@@yp6364反中質素係咁
多读点书吧
你在教我做事？
管好你们自己国家的事情。
信徒哇，知道什么是自由民主的本质吗。。民主就是站在自己立场争取自己利益，争到了，你就是民，主，争不到你就不算人，都想主，最后还是有钱有能量或者有背景阶层的人主，😂。自由是什么，比如有财富你才有财富自由，有话语权你才有话语自由，否则你只是在自言自语自嗨而已，，是有钱有能量的人的自由，不是你的自由，你不配。。。说白了自由民主就是弱肉强食的政治，只不过经过几个世纪的包装，成自由民主神教了，，古人都知道结党是要营私的😁。😁。。。
實話實說
说得简单明了
是的，西方弱肉强食几百年，结果其他国家被西方调教成傻白甜，一味地信所谓的自由民主能强身健体😅
A WISE AND SOBER SCHOLAR
美國的大問題是：
美國文化中那傲慢及優越感，另加種族歧視，使他失去了理智。
他們以為侵略他國是他們的特權！
他是否間諜？這樣也值得思考！😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢
在中國被罵的待不下去了，跑香港騙錢去了。
這件Jeffrey Sachs真的笑爆咀.
❤Let me put it straight, l never fear China and their success on communism practise. because although I can never be As good/altruistic as a chinese Communist, as a Normal selfish person who pretty much enjoy living by my work, Loving my family and the world and caring only for those i feel responsible for. i reasonably admire their genuine altruism intension for all classes of their people, matureness of their governance and recent decades of economical growth, they still had huge richest versus poor gap however they were able to get rid of extremely poor and every human in their country are able to work and earn a life that worth living. simple moral tells me, i am not those rich people can only rely on nonproductive financial games, robbery, colonizing, prosecution, invasion, bombarding and all kinds of strong predator weak meat war crime to get money and power, nor i care to be those racist who were so pathetic to watching people dog fighting for fun, every good soul on earth shall never fear or jealous of China's peaceful progress as long awaited evolution of human civilization.
Thank you for your positive message to the rational world.