Budget Magic: $99 (31 tix) UW Naban (Modern)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 28 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 268

  • @MTGGoldfish
    @MTGGoldfish  6 років тому +12

    You can read more about the deck (including ultra-budget and non-budget lists) here! www.mtggoldfish.com/articles/budget-magic-99-31-tix-uw-naban-modern
    Match 1: 6:23
    Match 2: 14:41
    Match 3: 29:37
    Match 4: 41:51
    Match 5: 50:36

    • @lostsoul9987
      @lostsoul9987 6 років тому

      MTGGoldfish This is one of my top favorite creations from you, Saffronolive. Looks so fun! Keep up the Sensational work!

    • @joshuaellis3051
      @joshuaellis3051 6 років тому

      Yeah reflector mage is bugged. There were quite a few times they just recast the creature you bounced.

    • @nizzidramanytt
      @nizzidramanytt 6 років тому

      Suprised in the article for the non budget version u never mentioned meddeling mage as a sideboard option against control/combo u would beable to name 2 cards per mage ;p

    • @up-downoverland3910
      @up-downoverland3910 6 років тому

      Negative, doesn't work.

  • @iwakuralain3064
    @iwakuralain3064 6 років тому +115

    Also known as "men with outstretched arms" tribal

  • @elizakleinman1332
    @elizakleinman1332 6 років тому +109

    "Outvaluing probably the best deck in Standard"

    • @joserene-t5z
      @joserene-t5z 6 років тому +3

      but this is modern?

    • @luluchavez4236
      @luluchavez4236 6 років тому +26

      But if 5 color humans was in standard it would be the best deck

    • @cedricwestcott1852
      @cedricwestcott1852 6 років тому +6

      31:06

    • @gregoryrasputin2954
      @gregoryrasputin2954 6 років тому +4

      Jose Rene Ticsay NO this is seth

    • @victorperezurbano9504
      @victorperezurbano9504 6 років тому +3

      The humans player was so bad it was painful to see, not playing vial turn one, sacrificing mantis riders for nothing, not using vials properly, bouncing a reflector... Wow

  • @419fish
    @419fish 6 років тому +66

    "So If we go land, land we got a shot"......Seth just NO... 9:28

  • @nialljr8329
    @nialljr8329 6 років тому +10

    Literally the best sound ever. 31:06

    • @Bloodnihilism
      @Bloodnihilism 6 років тому

      Sounded like Muttley from Wacky Races.

  • @SmugLookingBarrel
    @SmugLookingBarrel 6 років тому +26

    8:00 Your Humans opponent must have been SO confused when you flashed in Restoration Angel.

  • @SheonEver
    @SheonEver 6 років тому +4

    Wow I never realized condemn was the secret death shadow hose card. If there's ever a situation where they have 2 or even 3 out... if you condemn one, no matter whether it's at 2/2 or 13/13, the healing is going to kill the other ones - or better yet you condemn something else and kill the death shadows with it. :P

  • @theeldritchnerd8495
    @theeldritchnerd8495 6 років тому +66

    "The upside of playing jank" should be a new t-shirt design.

  • @Hanmacx
    @Hanmacx 6 років тому +47

    37:03 if you used trickster on Nexus it would have lost flying and you could have blocked it with trickster

    • @juannenna2293
      @juannenna2293 6 років тому +1

      the puntiest of punts lol

    • @ronankelley7768
      @ronankelley7768 6 років тому

      Ya he seemed to not really understand trickster’s interaction with flyers

  • @elizakleinman1332
    @elizakleinman1332 6 років тому +29

    Nabanimonicon is more fun to say

  • @dingding12321
    @dingding12321 6 років тому +2

    This is a REALLY cool deck. One of my faves that I've seen so far on this channel! AND it's budget!!!

  • @KingKw0ng
    @KingKw0ng 6 років тому +17

    36:51 Can you not just target the blinkmoth with Trickster so it loses flying? This allows you to block the mutavault with your angel and keep the trickster alive

    • @Hanmacx
      @Hanmacx 6 років тому

      Johnson Kwong yes

    • @myztik5716
      @myztik5716 6 років тому +1

      Yes I don't think he knows Trickster removes flying

    • @Zerothas
      @Zerothas 6 років тому +3

      He made this mistake in the last match too. Had a few opportunities to ground and kill restos and flickerwisps that match but didn't.

  • @wowtimeup
    @wowtimeup 6 років тому +3

    Man, when I'm building Azorius Control. Now I want to add in Naban and tempo out.
    At this rate, I'll just look into cosplaying the guy. This deck is pretty amazing.

  • @rexone9564
    @rexone9564 6 років тому +3

    94.5% is Mr Olive’s precise guesstimate.

  • @VEbeats
    @VEbeats 6 років тому +2

    "Naban outvalueing probably the best deck in standard" you're sick seth

  • @SmashPortal
    @SmashPortal 6 років тому +18

    "Probably the best deck in standard."
    Well that would be why you beat it in modern.

    • @lindzeesouperocd7558
      @lindzeesouperocd7558 6 років тому +5

      Smash how does Seth continuously say shit as if he just smoked some DMT right before the match? Not even trying to sound rude, but I think he is dabbling in something...

    • @chameleonedm
      @chameleonedm 6 років тому +1

      Clearly an excitable dude lol thats all, also happens to be why he's so appealing

    • @lindzeesouperocd7558
      @lindzeesouperocd7558 6 років тому +1

      Chameleon EDM man I really don't think so anymore lol.

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  6 років тому +7

      I just spend all day going from deck to deck, format to format, so sometimes I mix it up (especially since this deck is very similar to the Nabanamonicon deck we played in Standard).

    • @lindzeesouperocd7558
      @lindzeesouperocd7558 6 років тому +1

      MTGGoldfish so do a lot of other content creators Seth lol...

  • @petefry82
    @petefry82 6 років тому

    That budget mana base held you back. This deck has a ton of value!

  • @samtolliver4809
    @samtolliver4809 6 років тому +6

    31:07 Seth turns into a murloc

  • @ChilleDINJerseY
    @ChilleDINJerseY 6 років тому +15

    Mtggoldfish content makes me sort of deep down wish for some very temporary disability where I can just jam new mtg decks all day.

    • @horsebones727
      @horsebones727 6 років тому

      I'd argue this "disability" is of the variety which is more a super-power with enough dedication and drive.

    • @lizgayle14
      @lizgayle14 6 років тому +1

      Corey C ... I'm pretty sure they didn't mean it as a slight against Seth, they meant they wanted to be "disabled" so they could play Magic instead of working.

    • @horsebones727
      @horsebones727 6 років тому

      I know lol, I was agreeing really

  • @Itachi21x
    @Itachi21x 6 років тому +33

    Why was he able to cast Mage when you bounced him with Reflector?

    • @wumbo5560
      @wumbo5560 6 років тому +29

      Itachi21x probably an issue with the duplicated ability. The code probably wasn't ready for that to happen. Similiar thing happened when merfolk trickster released. Targeting a tarmogoyf with merfolk trickster auto killed it for like a week before it was fixed.

    • @cedricwestcott1852
      @cedricwestcott1852 6 років тому +4

      31:06

    • @thomasfriedlander7208
      @thomasfriedlander7208 6 років тому +8

      Reflector Mage says you can't cast. Aether Vial doesn't cast, it puts the creature on the battlefield.

    • @azza002
      @azza002 6 років тому +34

      Vial was on 3

    • @horsebones727
      @horsebones727 6 років тому +27

      Watch again Thomas, the Mage was cast with mana

  • @christofferdamjensen1207
    @christofferdamjensen1207 5 років тому +1

    Hey Goldfish Community :).
    I have been looking at this great creation and i honestly love naban combos and i have a wizard/merfolk (which also runs Naban) deck that i intend to upgrade. and splashing white for reflector and restoration angel is pretty damn cool. Path to exile is obviously perfect aswell!
    However after playing with my previous naban deck i feel that he is a magnet for early removal and therefore often doesnt get any value off. So i was considering putting some Wizard's Retort in the deck, possibly spell pierce aswell seeing as how effective it is in modern fx. to spell pierce a vial on turn 1/2 (Best feeling in the world btw :D).
    Which creatures would you consider cutting from the list to make room for some spells such as counters or possibly card draw spells like char a course etc?

  • @MegaYoutunes
    @MegaYoutunes 6 років тому +8

    venser can bounce reality smasher. Smasher only says SPELLS.

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  6 років тому +5

      But then we die to the Blinkmoths (since the third Blinkmoth can pump one of the other ones to two power).

  • @trewilliams383
    @trewilliams383 6 років тому +1

    Could he have bounced Chalice and an attacker with Venser, then been free to path another attacker in game 1 vs eldrazi? Am I missing something?

  • @JustAnotherPest
    @JustAnotherPest 6 років тому +5

    You know the color drained from that first guy's face as soon as Resto popped up.

  • @quatha
    @quatha 6 років тому

    I picked up this deck after watching this video, wow it is so fun to play! Thanks for sharing it. Question - what would you think about swapping in 2 Thassa's to replace 2 Selkie's? (I know that probably defeats 'budget') You lose the natural synergy with Naban but gain a really strong creature that is hard to deal with.

  • @FrankDTank16
    @FrankDTank16 6 років тому +2

    Man, the reflector bug feels real bad. They shouldn't be able to cast their cards on their turn after bounce.

  • @alexmakedon4915
    @alexmakedon4915 6 років тому +4

    36:48
    Why not to use trickster ability on blinkmoth and block mutavolt with resto and blinkmoth with trickster?

    • @Small_Panda
      @Small_Panda 6 років тому +6

      Because he isn't very good at playing trickster at all. I mean in the last game he should have waited for attacks from resto and flicker and tickersted them to lose flying so he can block and kill them but RIP I guess.

    • @horsebones727
      @horsebones727 6 років тому

      @MTGGoldfish 31:06

  • @johandahlberg3531
    @johandahlberg3531 6 років тому +1

    36:15 reason to target walking ballista with trickster cause it will loose ping ability, either they ping in response to trigger (block elsewhere) or they can’t ping after block (1 dmg)

  • @jonathanperigo6853
    @jonathanperigo6853 6 років тому +1

    ooooo like Planeswalker venser for this deck too. Like as a one of maybe.

  • @rossbalch
    @rossbalch 6 років тому

    I'm curious why in the non-budget version you don't go for the Unclaimed Terriroty, Ancient Ziggurat, Cavern of Souls package?

  • @PeteDoesGames
    @PeteDoesGames 6 років тому +9

    According to a post on reddit there is still a bug (that has been in the game for literally months... nice going wotc) where if you play 2 reflector mages in the same turn the target of the first one can be played normally. I assume this is also caused when you have multiple reflector mage triggers

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  6 років тому +1

      So Naban makes it like two Reflector Mages apparently :(

  • @alaricpaley6865
    @alaricpaley6865 6 років тому +4

    Reflector mage is hella bugged, opp recast flickerwhisp @55:00 as well as the meddling mage from game 1.

    • @turnipy88
      @turnipy88 6 років тому +1

      Alaric Paley yeah that was bullshit. Opponents shouldn’t use bugs to their advantage.

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  6 років тому +2

      Ideally it would just work right :(
      Unsure what the bug is, maybe it has to do with Naban + Reflector Mage (since Reflector Mage seemed to work right the rest of the time).

  • @antonbystrom3615
    @antonbystrom3615 6 років тому

    Hey Seth, hope to see Nabatean again soon. But would you consider to add the price to the individual card while doing the deck tech?

  • @ErroneousClique
    @ErroneousClique 6 років тому

    That G1 Humans salty scoop was great! They pretty much cheated by replaying that Mettling Mage fully knowing they werent supposed to as they play Reflectors as well and know exactly what the effect is.

  • @brianokafor9748
    @brianokafor9748 6 років тому +1

    Great deck Seth. I see that Naban is becoming your new favorite card as panharmonicon rotates out of standard. The only thing I would advise is the Mana base is bit weird. I would suggest 4 copies of glacial fortress, 3 port town, and 2 prairie stream and add 1 island and 1 plains for more manabase consistency..I noticed the deck had a lot of tap lands which isn't good in modern

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  6 років тому

      More basics could help. We did have some games where we were tapland flooded.

  • @taylorjones1641
    @taylorjones1641 6 років тому

    The Reflector Mage bug that allows your opponent to cast spells that it has bounced the turn before really affected you in that D&T match.

  • @x83_t76Y
    @x83_t76Y 6 років тому +2

    Would R/G dragons in modern work? Asking for a friend ;)

  • @DaneMurdock
    @DaneMurdock 6 років тому

    Would a few Reveillark's be worth sticking into this deck?

  • @deepskypics
    @deepskypics 6 років тому

    Hey! I'm a new player and am looking to play the most competitive 100$ or less ish budget UW deck. Which of your UW decks is the most competitive? Much of my playing will be amonst friends and just for fun

  • @totalcoward
    @totalcoward 6 років тому

    14:08 so that might be a very weird and specific bug with Reflector Mage triggers getting copied because opponent shouldn’t have been able to play Meddling Mage until your next turn.

  • @RandomCrappyName
    @RandomCrappyName 6 років тому

    Have they said why they changed the decklist overlay? New one just seems really plain

  • @rafaelsousa2633
    @rafaelsousa2633 6 років тому +1

    With Venser and Naban can't you just bounce one of your opponent's permanents plus Venser and keep doing it again and again?

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  6 років тому

      Yep, that's a good plan if we have a bunch of mana.

  • @alech-b3749
    @alech-b3749 6 років тому

    55:00 why could your opponent play Flickerwisp when you just reflected it? 2 iterations of that bug this video?

  • @Hopkins0316
    @Hopkins0316 6 років тому

    34:00 I'm pretty sure you bounce reality smasher and pray for resto to venser again with path for the 3rd blinkmoth. it was such an incredibly thin line of play though.

    • @Hopkins0316
      @Hopkins0316 6 років тому

      MTGGoldfish yeah. like I said super thin. and I might not have even thought of that line of play if I didn't see the match as a whole anyway. sometimes were just unlucker dogs.

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  6 років тому

      The problem is the third Blinkmoth could pump one of the attacking Blinkmoths, so we were dead on the spot of we didn't bounce both :(

    • @Hopkins0316
      @Hopkins0316 6 років тому

      I'd have to rewatch but I think bouning smasher makes them use too much mana to recast it and get them all in for swings. it's all gravy. was a super sweet deck, would love to see a nonbudget version sometime!

  • @totalcoward
    @totalcoward 6 років тому

    I don’t expect to see Naban living for a full turn very often.

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  6 років тому

      The first one dies a lot, in the the late game we can often play it and play something else right away to get value though.

  • @Valkyrie.99
    @Valkyrie.99 6 років тому +35

    6:23

  • @TheSlobberdawg49
    @TheSlobberdawg49 6 років тому

    During game 1 vs Eldrazi aggro you could have played the Master of Waves to double trigger and block the Reality Smasher.

  • @Sepharite
    @Sepharite 6 років тому

    Does Rally of the Ancestors work with this deck? I was able to bring back Master of Waves with all my dead creatures. Summoned 15 tokens!

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  6 років тому

      Hmm, it could be a fun sideboard option.

  • @josephrice4799
    @josephrice4799 6 років тому

    You did not leave the angel option open against eldrazi @33:00

  • @KregisAurelius
    @KregisAurelius 6 років тому +3

    Seth complaining that Resto + Flickerwisp is an annoying combo when he's basically doing the same thing but with Resto + Venser lmao

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  6 років тому +2

      Yeah, it was mostly annoying since it kept leaving us one mana short of playing our stuff!

    • @KregisAurelius
      @KregisAurelius 6 років тому

      Oh, i understand how its annoying for sure. I just found it hilarious that you're basically doing the same combo while complaining about them doing it

  • @ibrahimmagic1377
    @ibrahimmagic1377 6 років тому

    At 21:25 you know that you could have path to exile the grim lavamancer in reponse to the polluted delta getting craked in order to save 2 live

  • @tueffers
    @tueffers 6 років тому

    How about an Eerie Interlude variant using Archaeomancer?
    Would that necessitate cutting too much value?

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  6 років тому +1

      Hmm, thta would probably be a different build, it sounds fun though.

  • @poipoi9816
    @poipoi9816 6 років тому

    Oh, I like the new decklist style.

  • @Kogan1911
    @Kogan1911 6 років тому

    Hey Seth, I have this weird goal to find the coolest interaction with Arcane Adaptation. So I have already used Scion of the Ur Dragon with Adaptation on dragon to find a Serra's Avatar or a Blightsteel Colossus and kill my opponent with infect or commander damage but this deck makes me think: what are the best ETB effects that could be doubled with Naban? I'm sure there is SOME way to go infinite. I know you like Panharmonicon so I hope that you've considered this sort of thing. But is there anything cool that you can think of that Naban plus arcane adaptation on wizard can do that panharmonicon cannot?

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  6 років тому +1

      Hmm, I'll have to think about it. You can obviously make a lot of value if you can use any enters the battlefield trigger, and some combos (with things like Felidar Guardian or Restoration Angel), but it might just be better to play Panharmonicon itself rather than Naban + Arcade Adaption to make a Panharmonicon.

    • @Welverin
      @Welverin 6 років тому +1

      Kogan Naban's only advantages over Panharmonicon are its casting cost and the fact it can attack, its ability is more limited, only wizards and only ones you control.

  • @nosniboR_naI
    @nosniboR_naI 6 років тому +1

    55:00 there’s a bug you opponent shouldn’t even able to cast flicker wisp but yet they still did

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  6 років тому

      Yeah, I was wondering about this. It felt like a bug (maybe the second trigger from Naban doesn't work right with Reflector Mage?)

  • @Astar72439
    @Astar72439 6 років тому

    14:39 humans, the best deck in standard

  • @DarkCurow
    @DarkCurow 6 років тому

    Reflector Mage says you can't cast that card next turn. Vial doesn't cast.
    Edit: Nevermind. I didn't see that he didn't play it with vial, but cast it normally.

  • @The8BallADP
    @The8BallADP 6 років тому

    Frustrating to see opponents replaying creatures bounced with Reflector Mage the very next turn... I think that would have made a difference in some cases

  • @alexleblanc6364
    @alexleblanc6364 6 років тому

    No meddling mage in the non-budget version?

  • @Sepharite
    @Sepharite 6 років тому

    What's the best budget modern deck to play? I got the obliterator devotion deck and my friends hate it. I win every game. Now I'm looking for a deck that's challenging and fun. Humans?

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  6 років тому

      I think 8 Whack Goblins is the most competitive Modern budget deck.

    • @Sepharite
      @Sepharite 6 років тому

      Awesome, thank you. Great videos. I can't stop watching them!

  • @paulchoi5962
    @paulchoi5962 6 років тому +1

    Seth! Any chance of an updated nabanimonicon with M19

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  6 років тому +3

      Yes, updating budget magic decks is on my to-do list.

  • @DonovanPresents
    @DonovanPresents 6 років тому +3

    53:51 how very taxing indeed!

  • @GoronRob
    @GoronRob 6 років тому +5

    I'm a big fan of the new overlay

  • @Tsunamiis
    @Tsunamiis 6 років тому

    Doesn't death's shadow die to trickster trigger since it has no text box?

    • @joestorm101
      @joestorm101 6 років тому

      Just becomes a tapped 13/13

  • @davejimenez4248
    @davejimenez4248 6 років тому

    Why not wizards retort?

  • @Kealan124
    @Kealan124 6 років тому

    This needs a Thassa. Both abilities are great, and selkie + anything animates her.

  • @LockeLeviathan
    @LockeLeviathan 6 років тому

    Aether Vial doesn't cast, so it gets around Reflector Mage.

  • @chrisp3564
    @chrisp3564 6 років тому +1

    34:46 cant you path the smasher and block the inkmoth with resto?

    • @phantomdragonv2x
      @phantomdragonv2x 6 років тому +1

      Chalice on 1, but he could've venser'd a blinkmoth and the smasher and saved his creatures, and would've still been at 1

    • @Killluha
      @Killluha 6 років тому +1

      The third blinkmoth pumps the one you don`t bounce...

    • @Killluha
      @Killluha 6 років тому

      But he had a second seagate oracle trigger, which he didnt consider

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  6 років тому +1

      Yeah, the initial plan was to bounce Blinkmoth and Smasher, but then the opponent drew another Blinkmoth (so they could pump one of the attacking Blinkmoths to two power) so we would be straight up dead if we didn't bounce both Blinkmoths.

    • @phantomdragonv2x
      @phantomdragonv2x 6 років тому

      Fair enough, didn't see the third blinkmoth. That's kinda a ridiculous draw

  • @LogoMotive11
    @LogoMotive11 6 років тому

    "Let us draw our caaaarrdss...oppOnent...."
    IT SOUNDED SO SINCERE 😭😭
    P.S this deck is sweet

  • @pearlvtv412
    @pearlvtv412 6 років тому

    o m g i love this deck i will certainly buy it

  • @robertoneto6984
    @robertoneto6984 6 років тому

    the venser planeswalker also would be pretty good in this deck

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  6 років тому

      Venser does seem like it could be fun! Not sure what to cut though. (Also, expensive for the budget).

  • @matthewcertain1749
    @matthewcertain1749 6 років тому

    Time to rename the deck to CinNabon because of how sweet it was ^-^

  • @parkerhero8279
    @parkerhero8279 6 років тому

    "we won't scoop"
    Proceeds to scooping in the next 5 seconds of finishing the sentence.

  • @pablez94
    @pablez94 6 років тому

    I am wondering... Why are you not using trickster on Death Shadow? It'd insta-kill it, wouldn't it? without its ability it's just a 0/0, after all...

    • @treyconover4107
      @treyconover4107 6 років тому +1

      Pablez94 without its ability it's a 13/13

    • @pablez94
      @pablez94 6 років тому

      oh, right! i am stupid, sorry!

  • @joaovitorprudente1976
    @joaovitorprudente1976 6 років тому

    Wouldnt targeting a death's shadow with merfolk trickster kill It?

    • @futsalkeegan
      @futsalkeegan 6 років тому +1

      João Vitor Prudente no, because it would lose the ability “this creature gets -x/-x, where x is your life total. It would turn it into a vanilla 13/13

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  6 років тому

      I think it would just make it a 13/13 until end of turn.

    • @joaovitorprudente1976
      @joaovitorprudente1976 6 років тому

      Keegan Pelton thanks, i missread the card

  • @robertrosen6474
    @robertrosen6474 6 років тому

    Why not play panhaemonicon

  • @Jonathan-qk5ed
    @Jonathan-qk5ed 5 років тому

    why not add Eldrazi Displacer in this build

    • @sum1liteamatch
      @sum1liteamatch 5 років тому

      It requires colorless mana (waste) to activate so it would be like adding a 3rd color to the deck for just 1 cards ability

  • @DiogoVKersting
    @DiogoVKersting 6 років тому

    From what I've seen in the video, the meddling mage thing is some sort of bug.

  • @Grim-oc9fw
    @Grim-oc9fw 6 років тому

    Hey sephron olive keep your videos about magic no commentary on your local lgs

  • @jameswilson4328
    @jameswilson4328 6 років тому

    Seth: "Maybe we should have just gone to five?"
    Seth: *later "Yeah, we should have just gone to five."
    Seth pretty much never goes to five...

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  6 років тому

      One of these days I'm going to go to five, just to see the UA-cam response :)

  • @emoryhotchkiss9088
    @emoryhotchkiss9088 6 років тому

    I woke up in a cold sweat thinking this exact deck needs familiars ruse to reuse etb triggers and efficiently hard counter. The synergies 👌👌👌 were amazing
    And then I watched gameplay and was like ah this doesn’t even play counterspells it’s too aggressive and I’m so disappointed

  • @andreavolio8587
    @andreavolio8587 6 років тому

    Does Naban not double proc meddling mage?

    • @l337ath3ist
      @l337ath3ist 6 років тому +1

      No, mage doesn't have a triggered ability.

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  6 років тому

      Yeah, since Meddling Mage says "as" it enters the battlefield instead of "when" it enters the battlefield it isn't actually a triggered ability so it doesn't double up with Naban.

  • @kaemonbonet4931
    @kaemonbonet4931 6 років тому

    Holy shit, play of the day goes to that taxes player denying the draw with resto flicker naban

  • @EldarPeri
    @EldarPeri 6 років тому

    Why no Meddling Mage?

  • @toast_recon
    @toast_recon 6 років тому

    9:23 Keeping the clearest of mulls

  • @andnot6856
    @andnot6856 6 років тому

    Why does reflector mage count as a mythic?

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  6 років тому +1

      Hmm, because it's an "uncommon mythic"? Actually, it's probably a bug.

    • @andnot6856
      @andnot6856 6 років тому

      My bad, I think the orange stand for multicolor

  • @cedricwestcott1852
    @cedricwestcott1852 6 років тому +6

    31:06

  • @Duquette33
    @Duquette33 6 років тому

    i guess reflector mage has been bugged for a while

  • @Joester9
    @Joester9 6 років тому

    Aether Vial would make it perfect.

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  6 років тому +1

      If only it fit under the budget.

  • @benwesse8682
    @benwesse8682 6 років тому

    Vendillion clique would ne soooo gooood

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  6 років тому +1

      Yeah! Would help a lot against combo and control, just rough since it's $20 (it is in the non-budget build though).

  • @drakeconsumerofsoulsandche5761
    @drakeconsumerofsoulsandche5761 6 років тому

    I feel like vial would have been pretty good in this deck.

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  6 років тому

      Yeah, Aether Vial is one of the first cards I added to the non-budget list.

  • @bryantan4228
    @bryantan4228 6 років тому

    34:01 Why not bounce Reality Smasher?

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  6 років тому +1

      We would have die to a Blinkmoth Nexus (since the third copy could pump one of the first two).

    • @cuddlequeen3225
      @cuddlequeen3225 6 років тому

      Why not Path it? All you have to do is discard a card, right?

    • @bryantan4228
      @bryantan4228 6 років тому

      Cuddle Queen Chalice of the Void

    • @cuddlequeen3225
      @cuddlequeen3225 6 років тому

      Bryan Tan Aw. Thank you.

  • @flourish7759
    @flourish7759 6 років тому +1

    UW Panharmonaban

  • @R1S3_0F_D3ATH
    @R1S3_0F_D3ATH 6 років тому

    Modern version of Nabanamonicon eh?

  • @dariroch
    @dariroch 6 років тому

    Merfolk Trickster is my favorite card in magic. No one respects the power of this card.

  • @matteoferrando782
    @matteoferrando782 5 років тому

    I feel very sad when you path in you turn....

  • @randomsocknr.3334
    @randomsocknr.3334 6 років тому +1

    Seth! You can kill death‘s shadows with tricksters!!!

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  6 років тому +1

      I was wondering that. Wouldn't it just become a 13/13 though (since it loses the "gets -x/-x ability)?

    • @theparagonal
      @theparagonal 6 років тому

      MTGGoldfish Yes, it would

  • @mythrail
    @mythrail 6 років тому

    Nephalia Smuggler

  • @dmeigod8524
    @dmeigod8524 6 років тому +1

    Wouldn't merfolk trickster just kill a deathshadow?

    • @bernabebarrera-palacios2970
      @bernabebarrera-palacios2970 6 років тому +3

      Timithy Klesick the opposite

    • @dmeigod8524
      @dmeigod8524 6 років тому

      But making death shadow lose it's abilities isnt it's attack and defense it's ability?

    • @l337ath3ist
      @l337ath3ist 6 років тому +5

      It would make it a 13/13 until eot

    • @elesh.n
      @elesh.n 6 років тому

      Timithy Klesick it’s ability negatively impacts its stats. Without its ability it’s a 13/13.

    • @drakeconsumerofsoulsandche5761
      @drakeconsumerofsoulsandche5761 6 років тому

      FluxxedGames I'm now thinking of a new deck.

  • @richardbritton4675
    @richardbritton4675 6 років тому

    Humans would be good in standard