what really gets me is just how clean the wood joinery is and how flush the two components sit together. its made so clear by these artifacts that expertise and careful refinement of work was deeply valued even so early on in the development of these crafts
this device rather belongs to the category of cleavers. logs were split into different boards with this device. beat with a wooden mallet. Holders for the hollow blade were interchangeable, the main ones had to be straight. This is how dishes and boats were made.
One of my first thoughts on the two part axe is that perhaps it was made that way for more utilitarian reasons, you can use the same handle and just replace or repossession the axe head end to use it as an adz as well. Vs making and carrying two separate tools altogether all you really needed to do is just make the forepart and just swap or even just change the angle of it and use it that way.
I think it also may come down to where your axe handle will break. I suspect the nub that the axe head sockets on to, wears out faster than the handle, so its easier to drill out and reinforce a good oak burl for a handle, and replace your axe nub, than making a whole new handle.
One thing that might be worth considering is the tie-off loop could have also served as a latching point for burden bags/straps. Sorta akin to how some tools these days come with built it belt clips on the handles.
2:46 omg that handle shape from 3,000 years ago is the same be shape we use today for axes, large hammers, pick axes, and other tools. Clever idea to use a two piece wooden structure. Easier to replace smaller, quicker to make, parts instead of create a whole handle from scratch.
Can you imagine the controversy when that forward-looking Bronze Age woodworker said "Blow this, I'm not spending any more time looking for an elbow piece, I'm going to MAKE one!" :)
I would love if someone could do a review and tutorial on primitive clothing. Especially how people made clothing to survive in real cold/ice age environments.
As someone who has done a lot of lashing, binding, knotting and serving in his time--the shown method of lashing the axehead in place just does not ring true. It looks like it would torque the axehead in the wrong way and load the joints between the wood parts in a way that might lead to failure. There are a number of possible alternative lashings. Perhaps someday an intact lashing will be found.
My first thought, it must have been mosquito hell living above a still body of water, The two part axe : it extends the blade from the handle, so less likly to thump the handle against the tree trunk, at a better chopping angle , unlike an elbow branch type, which would, just my opinion, not a proven fact, Another fine intressting video, cheers Edited to add, on bigger tree felling
I come from the prairies in Canada, anyone else have the expression “to fly off the handle” meaning to get angry & uncontrollable, to lose one’s temper? Literally with an axe head flying off.
It seems to me that, the axe head had taken a step backward in design? The older stone axes had the handle hole in the middle of the axe head, like a modern axe head. Why would the abandon this idea and use a silly axe head like that one?
Only a,theoretician with time to wastewould build an axe haft in that way, when forked limbs are available everywhere. Why do europeans never look to other neolithic cultures?
what really gets me is just how clean the wood joinery is and how flush the two components sit together. its made so clear by these artifacts that expertise and careful refinement of work was deeply valued even so early on in the development of these crafts
this device rather belongs to the category of cleavers. logs were split into different boards with this device. beat with a wooden mallet. Holders for the hollow blade were interchangeable, the main ones had to be straight. This is how dishes and boats were made.
One of my first thoughts on the two part axe is that perhaps it was made that way for more utilitarian reasons, you can use the same handle and just replace or repossession the axe head end to use it as an adz as well. Vs making and carrying two separate tools altogether all you really needed to do is just make the forepart and just swap or even just change the angle of it and use it that way.
You could just turn the axe head sideways to make an adz. I think.
I bet there's a simpler answer for the 3 piece axe. It was fashionable.
I think it also may come down to where your axe handle will break.
I suspect the nub that the axe head sockets on to, wears out faster than the handle, so its easier to drill out and reinforce a good oak burl for a handle, and replace your axe nub, than making a whole new handle.
@@iseriver3982
I don't think that the adze was used in Britain before it was introduced by the Norman's.
@@HighWealder that's pure nonsense
One thing that might be worth considering is the tie-off loop could have also served as a latching point for burden bags/straps. Sorta akin to how some tools these days come with built it belt clips on the handles.
2:46 omg that handle shape from 3,000 years ago is the same be shape we use today for axes, large hammers, pick axes, and other tools. Clever idea to use a two piece wooden structure. Easier to replace smaller, quicker to make, parts instead of create a whole handle from scratch.
Can you imagine the controversy when that forward-looking Bronze Age woodworker said "Blow this, I'm not spending any more time looking for an elbow piece, I'm going to MAKE one!" :)
Very interesting, thank you
Wow!
Maybe having a removable head means you could use it in different ways, like a chisel, using the handle as a hammer, to make bowls or smaller objects.
I would love if someone could do a review and tutorial on primitive clothing. Especially how people made clothing to survive in real cold/ice age environments.
This is a brilliant idea - we've already got some ideas on how to incorporate this into a video (or two!)
As someone who has done a lot of lashing, binding, knotting and serving in his time--the shown method of lashing the axehead in place just does not ring true. It looks like it would torque the axehead in the wrong way and load the joints between the wood parts in a way that might lead to failure. There are a number of possible alternative lashings.
Perhaps someday an intact lashing will be found.
My first thought, it must have been mosquito hell living above a still body of water,
The two part axe : it extends the blade from the handle, so less likly to thump the handle against the tree trunk, at a better chopping angle , unlike an elbow branch type, which would, just my opinion, not a proven fact,
Another fine intressting video, cheers
Edited to add, on bigger tree felling
I come from the prairies in Canada, anyone else have the expression “to fly off the handle” meaning to get angry & uncontrollable, to lose one’s temper? Literally with an axe head flying off.
I found 10 of these
The 2 types of chisels. Do we have actual ones coming from archeological digs ?
You’ll have to wait for the next episodes in the series!
@@ancientcraftUK Ah, the suspense is killing me!! =)
And the two part handle would concentrate more weight at the working face.
Please speak up a little! Otherwise excellent!
It seems to me that, the axe head had taken a step backward in design? The older stone axes had the handle hole in the middle of the axe head, like a modern axe head. Why would the abandon this idea and use a silly axe head like that one?
Only a,theoretician with time to wastewould build an axe haft in that way, when forked limbs are available everywhere. Why do europeans never look to other neolithic cultures?
First