CVW-11: Interview with Heatblur Simulations!

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 31 гру 2024
  • Ігри

КОМЕНТАРІ •

  • @samuelnuchia4989
    @samuelnuchia4989 6 років тому +17

    if jester doesnt say "giggity" when i put the probe in the basket im gonna be mad

    • @carrierairwingeleven1747
      @carrierairwingeleven1747  6 років тому +5

      That'd be funny as hell. Also if they took the line from "Final Countdown" "MMMMM Contact"

    • @samuelnuchia4989
      @samuelnuchia4989 6 років тому +1

      @@carrierairwingeleven1747 yeah that one too jester's gonna be funny

  • @ra803g6
    @ra803g6 6 років тому +4

    Former Army officer here. Got into DCS for the Huey which my father spent time on as air crew. This heat blur project is the very first aircraft which would make me want to join a virtual navy org. Great job! Sounds like a great group of guys!

  • @6GUN
    @6GUN 6 років тому +16

    You can tell the HB guys really dove into this plane. Both feet, neck deep. Really looking forward to release day.

    • @KuvDabGib
      @KuvDabGib 6 років тому

      They have dived into our pockets , 6 months ago, yet still no module release.... Now it is time to start DEMANDING, not looking forward.

    • @6GUN
      @6GUN 6 років тому +1

      KuvDabGib Its not like they shook you upside down for your milk money. No one said you HAD to give them your money. They said it would be out by March 20th at the latest. Its not like making this plane is their only job.

    • @KuvDabGib
      @KuvDabGib 6 років тому

      @@6GUN I dont care about their other jobs, i havent payed them for other jobs. And nobody was mentioning March 21th in October - it was "This winter", yes i know winter lasts until 21st but back then their favorite date was Decemer 21st not March. Suddenly after money grab that changed abruptly from winter 2018/2019 to end of March 2019.

    • @6GUN
      @6GUN 6 років тому

      KuvDabGib From the time they dropped the reveal video they had said they were aiming for December but if they couldn’t make December they would be going for winter 2018/2019. They have even acknowledged that the latest day would be 20 March. Again, they didn’t force anyone to give them a dime. They are the last develepors ill be pre-purchasing from because the rest of the devs like dropping other modules with even less systems working. Everyone is excited for this plane. I hope the money from my pre-purchase goes to their release party booze.

    • @6GUN
      @6GUN 6 років тому +1

      KuvDabGib Ive never seen where (HB) said December 21st. Ive seen everone else mention it out of wishful thinking though.

  • @RightCenterBack321
    @RightCenterBack321 6 років тому +2

    I think it's awesome you guys are all veterans, NAs, and NFOs. It adds an incredible amount of authenticity to this interview.

  • @GW2Vids1
    @GW2Vids1 6 років тому +12

    Thank you so much for this, you guys seem to be a great group of guys!

  • @Dennree99
    @Dennree99 6 років тому +5

    Great video, I am glad that Heatblur found the time to do the interview with you guys.

  • @reillybrangan2182
    @reillybrangan2182 6 років тому +5

    Really great knowledge base here on CVW-11, awesome to see you guys sort of bouncing off each other with the devs even on nitty gritty details about the most discrete aspects of the aircraft, it really shows how deeply rooted heatblur seem to have become with regards to the complete workings and history of the bird. VERY much looking forward to what you guys can bring to the table content wise once the cat does finally release, I think there's probably more first hand Tomcat knowledge in this group and on this channel than anywhere else bar the SME's working for Heatblur!

    • @jasontrueman2726
      @jasontrueman2726 6 років тому +2

      Thank you , we definitely have a great dynamic in the group and Heatblur has done a hell of a job

  • @dennispicco7540
    @dennispicco7540 6 років тому +2

    Brilliant interview by very knowledgeable guys. Thanks Heatblur team for all the Awesome work.

  • @darendehaan2876
    @darendehaan2876 6 років тому +3

    @Heatblur - this is looking fantastic guys, keep up the great attention to detail.

  • @Angus_Gibson
    @Angus_Gibson 6 років тому +4

    I'm starting to get into DCS specifically for the Tomcat. Once I learn the ropes, I'd love to join a Carrier Air Wing and a legacy Tomcat Squadron like the Black Aces. Idk the process for joining, as I said I'm very new to DCS. Any advice for a noob?

  • @iainbradford4254
    @iainbradford4254 6 років тому +1

    Thanks for the dedication and attention to detail, not to mention the look behind the scenes in the re-creation of this marvel!

  • @Air-Striegler
    @Air-Striegler 6 років тому +2

    Thank you very much for uploading this very interesting interview.

  • @sevans5714
    @sevans5714 6 років тому +24

    CONFIRMED! Maverick was not a good pilot. "It is very hard to put the Tomcat into a flat spin.'

    • @104thMaverick
      @104thMaverick 6 років тому +13

      How dare you!

    • @sevans5714
      @sevans5714 6 років тому

      Correction: How dare they.

    • @jasontrueman2726
      @jasontrueman2726 6 років тому

      Lol

    • @playrnumberjuan
      @playrnumberjuan 6 років тому

      The B version, but what about the A?

    • @104th_pyromaniac5
      @104th_pyromaniac5 6 років тому +1

      There's no time to avoid flying through jetwash at high AoA and stalling out an engine when you're flying against a ghost up there. (Perhaps evidenced by the fact that he did it twice in one movie..)

  • @Void304
    @Void304 6 років тому +2

    DCS F-14 is being groomed to be the most enveloping sim experience of our time. Built from the ground up with Virtual Reality in mind, (which is something I personally believe will redefine the genre as we know it), it goes above and beyond the proverbial call of duty. NO ONE has EVER thrown so much time, effort and love into making their product the absolute best it could possibly be, and THAT is why Heatblur's Tomcat will stand head and shoulders above the rest. I very much doubt that there is an airplane that is more beloved by so many people all over the world.
    Like everyone else, I'm very much looking forward to mixing it up online with all of the Tomcat's air superiority competitors like Hornets and Flankers and Eagles and, eventually, even Vipers. I would even go so far as to say that it's detractors are probably at least a little bit curious to see what it's capable of. But most of all, I want to learn as much information as possible about this airplane, this arrant marvel of human ingenuity. Playing with this module will provide me with more raw data than any book or documentary could ever provide.
    I have other planes in the hangar and I enjoy them all. Fighter and attack jets have always impressed me with their lethal cocktail of speed, grace and killpower. However, of them all, none have ever dazzled me like the F-14. It's a shame that some community members have never been close to a living, breathing example. There is no experience on earth that can quite match the reverberating thunder of a Tomcat in full afterburner as it bullets across the sky a few hundred feet in front of your face.

  • @NSANasaSrpskaArhiva
    @NSANasaSrpskaArhiva 6 років тому +7

    Will they ever cosider making the F-14D aswell?

    • @TheGhilliSniper
      @TheGhilliSniper 6 років тому

      A while back they said they would like to make the D once both the A and B were feature complete. Idk if their still considering it though.

    • @KuvDabGib
      @KuvDabGib 6 років тому +3

      By the speed of progress, yeah, we will have D variant - around 2035 if nothing unplanned happens.

  • @JayDKB
    @JayDKB 6 років тому +4

    My question is WHEN WILL IT RELEASE??

  • @carrierairwingeleven1747
    @carrierairwingeleven1747  6 років тому +32

    14 MiG-28 Pilots downvoted this :D

    • @ClintThrust-e8r
      @ClintThrust-e8r 6 років тому +1

      Looked at this comment, laughed, then realised I had accidentally disliked the video, when I listened to the first half 😂😂😂

    • @darendehaan2876
      @darendehaan2876 6 років тому +3

      They're still a little sore over the 1986 incident... just don't mention the name Cruise or Kilmer. Talk about explosive... sheesh!

    • @bashka429
      @bashka429 6 років тому

      миг-28 не существует в природе.

    • @carrierairwingeleven1747
      @carrierairwingeleven1747  6 років тому

      @@bashka429 #TopGun :)

    • @geddiegamer296
      @geddiegamer296 4 роки тому

      there likes there just inverted

  • @rogerball41
    @rogerball41 6 років тому +1

    The most beautiful and powerful fighter aircraft ever made, when you see the F-14 on deck ready for catshot the nose down and large wings I can imagine the fighter pilot say : Ok guys I'm on my way and I'm going to kick your ass...

  • @Crainshaw83
    @Crainshaw83 6 років тому +10

    *2 weeks*

  • @mattwesson6885
    @mattwesson6885 6 років тому +2

    Any chance I could get into contact with "shotgun"? I recently found a helmet from VX-30 and was wondering if I could ask him some questions.

    • @carrierairwingeleven1747
      @carrierairwingeleven1747  6 років тому

      I'd be happy to pass it along, Shoot me an email at virtualcvw11@gmail.com and I'll be happy to forward him your email address

  • @SnowTiger45
    @SnowTiger45 6 років тому

    It's going to be so much fun, shooting these things down with my Mistral and or F-5E ... snicker ... grin !! lol

  • @PringphotographyDyndnsOrg1
    @PringphotographyDyndnsOrg1 6 років тому +2

    Spiceman may have worked on or flown my jet... 161134 :) I'm now responsible for taking care of her

    • @stevenspicer14
      @stevenspicer14 6 років тому

      Pring Photography that buno definitely sounds familiar... would have been Fast Eagle 100 or 101. All our other bunos were 160 series. She was a good jet... take good care of her? Does she still have 101 in red reflective tape on the rear cockpit front panel?

    • @PringphotographyDyndnsOrg1
      @PringphotographyDyndnsOrg1 6 років тому

      @@stevenspicer14 I shall take a peek when I can get in the cockpit again, she is under restoration - new VF-41 paint scheme, she retired under 41 colors so her cockpit is spaded out

  • @birddogoutdoors8320
    @birddogoutdoors8320 6 років тому +1

    Ok are they going to have ai to fly if want to learn the back seat ? Or is it going to take a friend to learn both at the same time

    • @carrierairwingeleven1747
      @carrierairwingeleven1747  6 років тому +2

      They have what's called "IceMan AI" that is going to be a rudamentary front seat pilot if you want to jump in the backseat to learn. That, as far as I'm aware, is single player only

    • @fragelicious
      @fragelicious 6 років тому

      That is rediculaslly cool.

  • @Scoobydcs
    @Scoobydcs 5 років тому

    is the f14d a plausible module or not? most of my squadron fly the f18 and id love some more upto date avionics

    • @cypher1o1
      @cypher1o1 5 років тому

      Don't quote me on this but from I heard they'd like to do it but probably not anytime soon. Think after F-14A, A-6 AI, Supercarrier DLC, USS Forestel.

  • @Voodooflies
    @Voodooflies 5 років тому

    Hey guys, have you got any ETA until CVW-11 recruitment reopens ?... I'd leave my wife to be part of you guys !

    • @carrierairwingeleven1747
      @carrierairwingeleven1747  5 років тому

      LOL Don't do that! throw your app on the website, we're taking a few at a time to fill slots available :)
      Shoot me an email virtualcvw11@gmail.com

  • @MrDarracuda
    @MrDarracuda 6 років тому

    What is "MIG-28"? Dream in your shit? Shit in your dream? Heh!

  • @samuelnuchia4989
    @samuelnuchia4989 6 років тому +2

    also i hope the ai a-6 can be used as a KA-6 cause the S-3 tanker is boring

    • @alexsp7086
      @alexsp7086 6 років тому

      did not watch it yet at work but are they making an A6 Module to fly?? :)

    • @andrewchr
      @andrewchr 6 років тому

      @@alexsp7086 AI only

    • @104thironmike4
      @104thironmike4 6 років тому

      KA-6 is part of the plan, ostrich. :-)

  • @JZainbear
    @JZainbear 6 років тому

    This is so finitely modeled I think HeatBlur should release a 20 - 30hr flight school video set for purchase. It needs to cover every system, tactics, employments etc. Actual f-14 school is a year? We'll need help to get the most out of this baby.

    • @PhillMagGamerDad
      @PhillMagGamerDad 6 років тому

      Doe Joe , personally I'd be bleak if I had to purchase additional training material after already paying for the F14 as a pre-order. The assumption is that the training school comes with the module. If you want to see some pretty interesting but easy to understand ACM maneuvers, try to Google Jane's Advanced Tactical Fighters manual, pretty cool info

    • @JZainbear
      @JZainbear 6 років тому

      Phillip Nicholson but you wouldn’t have to purchase it. It would be an optional advanced video series. You would have an account and it would give you access to advanced f-14 video training for the pilot and Rio straight from the developers. I’ve never seen an included manual that offered that. Falcon 4.0 provided a lot but it wasn’t advanced training. Anything that comes with purchase right now would be a pilot operating handbook not advanced training.

    • @Void304
      @Void304 6 років тому

      @@JZainbear Just wait, there will be an uncountable number of F-14 tutorials on UA-cam. For free.

  • @Scoobydcs
    @Scoobydcs 5 років тому

    i love my cat, still dont know how everything works though lol

  • @shd4618
    @shd4618 6 років тому +1

    2 months to go.......

  • @fragelicious
    @fragelicious 6 років тому

    The Iranians got 72 Tomcats not 99.

  • @bashka429
    @bashka429 6 років тому +1

    DCS WORLD the same is included in the sanctions policy of the United States ??? delirium, the missile carrier flies without an escort, the escort is carried out by the MiG-31BM with missile armament RVV-BD with a range of up to 300 km. Su-30SM and Su-27SM and SM3. LA aircrafts represented in this game - most of them were decommissioned (MI-29A and MIG-29C) Su-27P almost replaced by SU-27CM3 and Su-35. The R-27ER rocket maneuvering attitude is several times greater than your stump of 120С by 70 km. The 120C-7 is the same stump with a greater range. but what about the R-27AE rocket (oh well, how could it be better than the 120C) and what about the toughest R-27ЭП rocket (it works according to the AGM-88C principle only for air targets, unlike the active 120C, the R-27ЭП does not produce What kind of radiation, and this is the only one after the rocket with the heat head of the self-confidence, the rocket was launched and forgotten.)

  • @MrRoonkie
    @MrRoonkie 6 років тому +3

    Tell me this, who are the Morons voting this down, i haven't even watched the video yet and voting it up because i know it will be awesome.

    • @MrZockerfreak11
      @MrZockerfreak11 6 років тому +2

      Read your own comment you complain about people rating the video before watching and then practically admit you did the same thing

    • @KuvDabGib
      @KuvDabGib 6 років тому

      Why would you call disappointed customers a morons?
      When you are lied about something and you can still see how other people are being lied about same crap isnt it only right to warn others before same crap happens to them?
      Heatblur had a big bragging time about this and that and how they will do a lot of things. It ultimately ended with nothing except failed expectations.
      But yet somehow disappointed people are morons - not the greedy company managers which lied over and over about their product?
      Interesting....

    • @fragelicious
      @fragelicious 6 років тому

      These miserable liberals will always bitch about something.

    • @apesidewv8187
      @apesidewv8187 6 років тому

      @@KuvDabGib Calm down, think about the bigger picture. When you downvote a video you are hurting the video creator, not the dev. Its not really fair to shoot the messenger.

    • @KuvDabGib
      @KuvDabGib 6 років тому

      @@MrZockerfreak11 i havent payed Heatblur in advance to watch how others enjoy the same module - im sick of videos, i want F-14 module!

  • @SDsc0rch
    @SDsc0rch 6 років тому +5

    "virtual" CVW-11
    (( could use... vCVW-11 ))

    • @jasontrueman2726
      @jasontrueman2726 6 років тому +1

      Yeah we normally put VCVW-11 probably just an oversight.

    • @carrierairwingeleven1747
      @carrierairwingeleven1747  6 років тому +1

      Virtual was used, I don't feel the need to repeat it constantly to ensure that everyone knows that we're "virtual". It's pretty obvious at this point :)

    • @Conan_Obrien
      @Conan_Obrien 6 років тому +2

      You check out the description? www.vcvw-11.com

    • @Ohgr819
      @Ohgr819 6 років тому +1

      Stop whining

    • @JohnMaxGriffin
      @JohnMaxGriffin 6 років тому +2

      @@carrierairwingeleven1747 No, it's not obvious at first glance. Your channel name literally just says Carrier Air Wing Eleven, which is the real thing. Your logo is identical to the patch with no distinction made, and the same is true for the virtual squadrons you list. You need to do a better job of making it obvious that you've got nothing to do with CVW-11. This would be considered copyright infringement if it wasn't a military organization. There are people out there who watched their friends die in service with these squadrons (including the guy who taught me how to fly), and equally (if not more) importantly, people have died at their hands. The names here should be treated with a little more respect than people are going to give to a group of guys using a virtual simulator together.
      Look I think what you're doing is cool and you're doing it well, just consider taking this advice please. The whole copycat thing leaves a bad taste in the mouth.

  • @horuslupercal3872
    @horuslupercal3872 6 років тому +4

    Wow first comment really?

  • @mikeekim2532
    @mikeekim2532 4 роки тому

    I tried this when they offered it for a two day free trial. I am sad to report that just like the Yak, F16 & F18 that it is a slideshow as far as framerates compared to well done aircraft like all the FC3 aircraft, and the Harrier. I fail to understand why they can't make these newer jets fly as butter-smooth as the Harrier? What is the attraction to flying an aircraft with slideshow framerates? Seriously, there is no excuse to an immediate 30% loss of framerates when other DCS aircraft just as detailed and complex run so very well, what gives??

    • @carrierairwingeleven1747
      @carrierairwingeleven1747  4 роки тому

      I suggest reporting your gripe to the HB subsection on the forums along with your PC specs.

    • @mikeekim2532
      @mikeekim2532 4 роки тому

      @@carrierairwingeleven1747 Not a gripe at all, it is an honest and clear comparison framing my question, which you did not answer. I am not the only person to post asking why this aircraft has such underwater framerate issues. There is no need to make an issue with me. The question is valid, what has the Harrier and all FC3 Aircraft have going for it that the F14, 16, 18 and Yak do not? Whatever the answer is would be a win-win for everyone who fly's these baby's if they cared to address these issues.☺

    • @carrierairwingeleven1747
      @carrierairwingeleven1747  4 роки тому

      ​@@mikeekim2532 FC3 aircraft do not model complex systems, nor complex flight models, they are "game" aircraft and not full fidelity modules. No aircraft but the Tomcat has 8K textures. The harrier does not have complex cockpit textures, they are rather simple in comparison.
      Also in terms of the differences in the Tomcat, every rivet, switch, nut, bolt, screw, wire etc in the cockpit was laser scanned to make the model. It's by far the most complex and accurate representation of an aircraft in DCS.
      I use the term "gripe" in its true form, which is a "complaint." I cannot help with complaints as I do not work for Heatblur. I have 20 tomcat pilots/RIO's in CVW-11 and not a single one complains about FPS in the Tomcat, that is the extent of my knowledge of FPS issues in the airframe. Therefore I directed you to the ED forums where you may get some help with it :)
      Or if you would post your PC specs I can somewhat explain what may be happening. But it's not optimal compared to support in the ED forums.

    • @mikeekim2532
      @mikeekim2532 4 роки тому

      @@carrierairwingeleven1747 Thank you for the complete answer. But in all honesty, the Harrier looks as great as it runs. It has serious systems and is no lightweight in system-complexity.
      About the beautiful f14, what good is an aircraft that cannot be run above slideshow framerates for the vast majority of people reporting their experiences online? Gorgeous -YES!
      But you need more of a system than most people own just to run DCS's ancient single-core clogging code, let alone the behemoth of a performance killer f14 piled on top.
      Balance is beauty plus performance.
      F14 tips the scales on beauty, no question there, but its performance issues, as stated by most everyone I hear from online, is a slideshow.
      Every map, even just over water.
      Perhaps for the walloping prices they charge for these newer aircraft they should provide a framerate friendly version that can be flown without seizure inducing stutters? That's all I am saying.
      F14 could look as good as the Harrier and run as butter smooth as well. To say less is to say that f14 is already as perfect and optimized as possible and unimprovable.☺

    • @mikeekim2532
      @mikeekim2532 4 роки тому

      ryzen 5. ssd, rtx2018, I can run ALL other DCS aircraft, anywhere and anytime smoothly,
      EXCEPT the still unfinished Yak, F14, F16 and F18. Owned some of these for almost 2 years and they are still unfinished, unoptimized and a guaranteed 30% drop in fps.
      Maybe in 5 years ED will find time to finish one of these lingering in production-coma aircraft, but you can pre-order supercarrier, am I right☺ LOL

  • @dantepumareja4128
    @dantepumareja4128 4 роки тому

    Hi’ in learn aviation videos of different planes as primer has same concept in prev’s. F4, 100, 111 has two pilots research if aerobatics even lighter planes. Perhaps about flying hours is the primer as dream pilot either in commercial plane but our hardtime parent cataract eye then leak pipelines house with double installation to repair at side of house leak pipelines overwhelm by neighbors cutting blades to repair then a double in meter with gauge valve first before dig the repair part is not able they said in learn.

  • @bellator11
    @bellator11 6 років тому

    What I'd really like to see is the DFCS incorperated, made the aircraft a lot more stable during maneuvers.

    • @PhillMagGamerDad
      @PhillMagGamerDad 6 років тому +1

      bellator11, sure that was introduced with the F14D, right? Falls outside of what they were aiming for.........

    • @bellator11
      @bellator11 6 років тому

      ​@@PhillMagGamerDad Yeah, but it would be a welcome addition down the road :) I'm honestly expecting them to eventually be doing the D version too, I wouldn't understand it if they didn't to be honest as they've already done most of the ground work with the F-14B.

    • @PhillMagGamerDad
      @PhillMagGamerDad 6 років тому +1

      @@bellator11, oh don't get me wrong, I'd love the F14D. But like they mentioned, apparently it is really hard to get hold of info on the later models, especially systems and sensors info. Not necessarily classified, just impossible to chase down

    • @bellator11
      @bellator11 6 років тому

      @@PhillMagGamerDad I see, well I hope they can chase it down eventually. Manuals for the D version are there, but I don't know about detailed systems info.

    • @Void304
      @Void304 6 років тому

      I think you mean to say that you want the F-14D? Both the A and B models also received the DFCS upgrade before the plane was retired.

  • @slowfuse
    @slowfuse 6 років тому +2

    Fix the harrier first

    • @swe-timberwolf3642
      @swe-timberwolf3642 6 років тому +8

      1. Harrier is in early access and is being worked on.
      2. Harrier is made by Razbam, not Heatblure. Wrong 3:d party developer.

    • @Essah15
      @Essah15 6 років тому +12

      Heatblur is not the creaters of the Harrier, The Harrier is made by Razbam so you are barking up the wrong tree here

    • @gregturner9415
      @gregturner9415 6 років тому +6

      Wrong company

    • @darendehaan2876
      @darendehaan2876 6 років тому +2

      @slowfuse Do your research first, nimrod.

    • @slowfuse
      @slowfuse 6 років тому

      @@darendehaan2876 whoosh