Delta Force Turned Down Osama Bin Laden Raid? Truth Revealed!

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 29 вер 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 440

  • @davidhooksteadinterviews
    @davidhooksteadinterviews  7 місяців тому +13

    Make sure to like and subscribe!

    • @johnl-cz2qg
      @johnl-cz2qg 7 місяців тому +1

      Why would anyone do that when your audio sucks so damn bad!!!

    • @73joebrant
      @73joebrant 7 місяців тому +1

      maybe ASK him why his audio is low. I BET he fixes it...Just my opinion Bro@@johnl-cz2qg

  • @Mikemikemike131
    @Mikemikemike131 7 місяців тому +194

    Wonder if McRaven regrets choosing DEVGRU because of the drama it caused in the unit and bad publicity Rob O'Neill has brought. Delta would've definitely been more quiet on the raid

    • @josephmukoko674
      @josephmukoko674 7 місяців тому +23

      Like they did for Saddam Hussein

    • @jimpowell2296
      @jimpowell2296 7 місяців тому

      Are you kidding? You do know that Biden said it was ST6 that conducted the raid. That meant the families of ST6 became targets along with ST6. The press ran with it. What do you think would have happened if Delta had done the raid? There are always ways for the press to find out things. Then rumor’s start. That is how this happened.

    • @muriloninja
      @muriloninja 7 місяців тому

      Rob has done nothing NSWC hasn't blessed....NSWC are our biggest drama queens who love publicity over anything else! None of the shit that comes out of it accurate and that goes for "Lone Survivor"....they approve what is out there and people go along with it.

    • @nwcoastlife
      @nwcoastlife 7 місяців тому

      I don’t know how much truth there is to it, but John “Shrek” McPhee, who was a Sgt Major in Delta (not subordinate to JSOC) at the time said CIA was withholding Intel, so they told JSOC to pound sand. McRaven gave the mission to DEVGRU.

    • @tramainebass3371
      @tramainebass3371 7 місяців тому +29

      ⁠@@josephmukoko674 who revealed delta took captured sadaam? Remember when he was initially captured other coalition forces and 4ID associated with his capture. It was not by an operator or by a member within the TF.

  • @stephanarizona9094
    @stephanarizona9094 7 місяців тому +9

    Commenting before watching full video to see if I am correct at the end of the video. From what multiple sources on The Shawn Ryan Show said was all other DEVGRU/DELTA Teams had eyes on them and the White House wanted the mission to be ultra quiet, had they moved a team already on a mission it would have drawn attention, the Operators selected for the mission all were in training or had cover stories that would not draw attention. They were able to assemble a team without even other teams hearing about the mission.

  • @timmyd1911
    @timmyd1911 7 місяців тому +3

    Simply put the truth is admiral. McCraven, who is a seal, was commander of socom , and wanted DEVGRU to perform the mission simply because he is seal himself.

  • @dujesimunovic9391
    @dujesimunovic9391 7 місяців тому +3

    John Mcphee said in your interview that Delta was offered but they turned it down because Agency playing games? Whom do we trust ? You or SOB?

  • @RR-ty6zz
    @RR-ty6zz 6 місяців тому

    I heard many reports of a few delta operators also on the raid not just team6. Also heard about 108 operators total did this raid

  • @ScottD44
    @ScottD44 7 місяців тому +1

    The Best Channel On UA-cam!

  • @bobwaldman9996
    @bobwaldman9996 7 місяців тому +3

    DEVGRU AND DELTA FORCE ARE EQUAL AND THEY ALL KNOW IT

  • @jimpowell2296
    @jimpowell2296 7 місяців тому +1

    I will answer then listen to your video. Two things come to mind. Admiral McRaven was in charge of DEVGRU at that time. He was a former SEAL. Also I believe Delta was doing their thing in Iraq and the SEALS were doing their thing in Afghanistan. With that said I don’t think Delta could have done any better than the SEALS did. How both of these units adapt and accomplish their missions is outstanding.

    • @sgedeon01
      @sgedeon01 7 місяців тому

      It was a cookie cutter mission by the time ST6 got him in Pakistan.
      According to McRaven’s book “Sea Stories” as well as his interview on Jocko’s podcast Delta did not have any squadrons available to do that mission so it went to ST6. ST6 was the right choice anyway, not because they are more capable than Delta on land but because Afghanistan was their main AO since about 2002.

    • @jimpowell2296
      @jimpowell2296 7 місяців тому

      @@sgedeon01
      That is BS. McRaven was the head of DEVGRU at the time and was an ST6 operator during his service. Delta operated in Iraq, ST6 operated in Afghanistan. It was a simple call.

    • @deathfire096
      @deathfire096 7 місяців тому

      @@jimpowell2296 No. McRaven was in charge of JSOC. He could have used either TIER 1. In my opinion DEVGRU are a tighter unit because they have been under 1 community for years. Delta picks their operators from different communities and even branches but that doesn't guarantee they will be tight together on their first deployment.

  • @cjnappi2598
    @cjnappi2598 6 місяців тому

    It was all territory… each special operations units controlled certain areas .. osama happened to be where devgru was in charge of

  • @ericolmos7816
    @ericolmos7816 7 місяців тому +9

    Great video! Delta is the best Tier 1 group in the world!!!

    • @Grayman58
      @Grayman58 7 місяців тому

      🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧 Tosser

  • @ericgardner5548
    @ericgardner5548 6 місяців тому

    Your volume is too low...

  • @Guns_money_and_mayhem
    @Guns_money_and_mayhem 7 місяців тому

    Actual Delta was assigned another mission that was scheduled to happen at the exact same time going after at the time a secret nuclear facility in Iran. When the TFO team setting the E&E lane in was captured their mission was scrubbed. #realreason

  • @TheExsoldier1
    @TheExsoldier1 6 місяців тому

    I have to say, it doesn't sound right that a Military unit would 'turn down' a mission. At the end of the day they are in the army if they were asked to plan and implement such an operation I don't think it would be for them to say, 'No sorry, not for us we'll pass' ...Sounds like a duty rumor started by a civvy. but hey how am I to say...

  • @abeldyer8316
    @abeldyer8316 7 місяців тому

    With all due respect your audio on this video is similar to Seal Team 6.....it sucks!! Apart from that you’re good to go. Enjoyed the video and will subscribe.

  • @justwayne4785
    @justwayne4785 7 місяців тому

    It was the same with the British, SBS AO was Afghanistan and SAS was Iraq.

  • @mattapplebong
    @mattapplebong 6 місяців тому

    Right.

  • @JohnnyLightningV10
    @JohnnyLightningV10 7 місяців тому

    Everyone sitting here making assumptions oh Seal Team 6 was already there when they got the call 😂.....Nope Seal Team 6 trained in eastern NC on a mock up version of the building before deploying back to Afghanistan. The truth was Delta at the time was concentrated in Iraq and other locations. Seal Team 6s logistics was already setup for Afghanistan missions with their support groups. That's why McCraven picked them because if he moved a bunch of logistics around he could have tipped someone off so he kept minimum in the know with least amount of change so they wouldn't compromise the mission as something big is about to happen.

  • @GUNSHIPFLEX
    @GUNSHIPFLEX 7 місяців тому

    McRaven is the reason

  • @JohnGreyman
    @JohnGreyman 7 місяців тому

    I heard it wasnt even O'Neil that clacked UBL. That he just takes credit and splits the $ with the real clacker jist like Latrell and his guys only fought 20 or so of the tally and just got out maneuvered. These guys just want to sell books and speaking opportunitys. When the truth is something that doesnt sell, they just lie. Call salesmen with a 416 instead of used car lot.

  • @gerardblackman237
    @gerardblackman237 6 місяців тому

    Seal Team 6 was chosen because the head of SOCOM was a high ranking naval officer and he showed favoritism to towards naval unit!!!

  • @JohnFairchild-w3i
    @JohnFairchild-w3i 7 місяців тому

    Seal Team. 6. Was. Chosen. Because. They. Had. Way. Way. More. Roll. Time. Quicker Response. They are the. Expert,s in this. Type of. Mission. Not dogging. Delta at. All. Both. Could. But. Delta is. Different. They. Have their. Specialties and this. Fell into. Gold Team. Speciality

  • @speedracer2336
    @speedracer2336 7 місяців тому

    If Delta did it we would have known the details only, nothing about the participants!

    • @deathfire096
      @deathfire096 7 місяців тому

      says who? No Delta ever wrote a book? NO Delta gives interviews. The founder of DELTA was the one writing books before the SEALs.

  • @Justobserving9291
    @Justobserving9291 7 місяців тому

    Video came up on my feed. This host makes a claim that one team is better than another team. He discredits himself in that statement.
    Never compare the two groups for who’s the best. It shows you are the naive person in the conversation.

  • @Wide2point1x3bets
    @Wide2point1x3bets 7 місяців тому

    Delta vs st6? Delta has always won that idk why it’s coming into question again

    • @deathfire096
      @deathfire096 7 місяців тому +1

      won what? wear more medals in the uniforms. Army gives out medals just to getting dress.

    • @Wide2point1x3bets
      @Wide2point1x3bets 7 місяців тому

      @@deathfire096 the argument. The unit has its own command and can be deployed anywhere without support from jsoc. More time down range leads to more experienced and mature operators. The unit also will take recruits from any branch with any mos, which leaves you with an outfit that has unlimited capabilities. This isn’t a matter of opinion just facts. If you knew or asked anyone from either organization they would tell you the same thing.

  • @benhammerhead376
    @benhammerhead376 7 місяців тому +1

    False information. DEVGRU was given the Op because DEVGRU was assigned A-Stan and CAG had AO responsibility for Iraq. As far as the DEVGRU Squadron depended on who was not on deployment and who wasn't on "Real World" stand-by. That left Red Squadron because they were back in CONUS. They were able to brief and train for the OP and deploy.

  • @6timechamp
    @6timechamp 2 місяці тому

    David I really hope you got facual evidence of this if you are making a horrendous claim like this 😮

  • @wesleylooper7726
    @wesleylooper7726 7 місяців тому +2

    You cannot even compare DEVGRU to CAG units. CAG would win 10 times out of 10 in any simulation.

    • @deathfire096
      @deathfire096 7 місяців тому

      Stay off the crack. Both are Tier 1 and very similar under JSOC . Why do children write dumb things.

    • @wesleylooper7726
      @wesleylooper7726 7 місяців тому

      @@deathfire096 someone caught some feelings, I see.

    • @deathfire096
      @deathfire096 7 місяців тому

      @@wesleylooper7726 and is not jealousy or bullshiat. LOL

    • @rickhunter7443
      @rickhunter7443 7 місяців тому +1

      That’s a fantasy. Devgru and Delta do the exact same things. But Devgru is more unique because of their capability to transition to the water. Delta has dive teams but every single Devgru guy is capable of doing a diving mission, that’s the difference. Devgru has done pretty much every operation on land in the past 2 decades, they did it just like delta.

  • @RocksNRuts4
    @RocksNRuts4 7 місяців тому

    all civilians know are st6 because all they do is talk, go on yt, make tv shows, make up stories etc.....if you werent in the combat arms you dont know, period.

    • @deathfire096
      @deathfire096 7 місяців тому

      only less than 1% of SEALS go public. To say they speak for all SEALS is like saying you speak for your whole family and since you are an A-hole, everybody with your last name are a-holes. That's how ignorant you sound.

  • @HalfmcHalfguinea
    @HalfmcHalfguinea 7 місяців тому +72

    John McPhee was the one who said they weren't giving enough information on the target so they turned it down.

    • @jjducci
      @jjducci 7 місяців тому +9

      My dad’s good friend is with the
      22nd SAS. The are practically identical, and if they where told to execute mission, they wouldn’t have a choice, they simply execute whatever mission comes their way.

    • @Wes_Is_A_Mess
      @Wes_Is_A_Mess 7 місяців тому +17

      And his (McPhee) statement that there wasn't a lot of intel on the mission given to the operators match what guy's from red squadron said. John's point was they offered a mission with no intel packet and they passed, it just so happened to be the UBL raid, which no one but the higher-ups knew at that time. I believe John.

    • @bubbaballer88
      @bubbaballer88 7 місяців тому +8

      @@jjducciNot necessarily true. They have latitude to accept/reject missions. For example, SEALs wanted to go in via Helo after both extortion and lone survivor happened but their leadership denied them and told their chain of command they would not be accepting that mission due to the risk.

    • @OMT988
      @OMT988 7 місяців тому

      @@jjducci pretty much (although they dont just execute they conduct the full targeting cycle to conduct those operations, no one goes in blind), US may be slightly different though. in the UK the director gets the 'tasks' and nominates the unit he thinks will be best....at HQ level there may be discussions to help advise the director in the case a particular group may be best matched.
      but no SF unit is turning down a task. just imagine the impact that would have...it would literally put a black mark against them for future ops... no only that, the guys that hit those targets want nothing more than to deploy and get jobs done.

    • @flyingirish31
      @flyingirish31 7 місяців тому

      @@jjduccithat’s not true for tier one units in US. Particularly when missions can deem them deniable assets should something go wrong. Can’t speak to 22SAS

  • @joesgotya9930
    @joesgotya9930 7 місяців тому +53

    The 75th Rangers could of done the UBL raid lol

    • @mikenettle7655
      @mikenettle7655 7 місяців тому +14

      Absolutely. They would’ve kept their mouths shut about it to.

    • @andrews2990
      @andrews2990 7 місяців тому +10

      Could have*** not ‘could of’

    • @joesgotya9930
      @joesgotya9930 7 місяців тому

      @@andrews2990 ( )o( )

    • @cheekboy7247
      @cheekboy7247 7 місяців тому +5

      But surley you wouldnt send them for something like that. Better with more mature operators, and the operation had no enablers on target. Only space for tier 1 SF.

    • @joesgotya9930
      @joesgotya9930 7 місяців тому +2

      @@cheekboy7247 I agree, I’m just saying that with all the direct action hits these Units had done prior to 2011, that it wasn’t that hard of a target to assault from a tactics perspective. The other aspect is the tier 1 units are much faster and consistent with their SSE procedures. They get alot more in depth training and instruction from the OGAs on how to look for and find intelligence material on every target they hit. Rangers just grab everything they see and exfill LOL

  • @josephmukoko674
    @josephmukoko674 7 місяців тому +46

    I don’t why we are trying to compare them or say which one is better. They are both ELITE (Tier 1) troops and we should appreciate them. Even when we watch operators on both teams talking, you can see that although they are very competitive, they have huge respect for one another.

    • @miket7173
      @miket7173 7 місяців тому +7

      When you are outside the wire none of that shit matters. Doesn’t matter if DEVGRU, Delta or SF you’re all brothers and have each other’s backs. DEVGRU, Delta, SF and Seals work together quite often.

    • @JohnHolmes-om8cg
      @JohnHolmes-om8cg 7 місяців тому +1

      Because…The Internet….and arguments on the Internet….by people sitting at home🤷‍♂️
      Awesome times, huh🙄

    • @crusher8017
      @crusher8017 6 місяців тому

      Sick and tired of people from the U.S. calling units Tier 1, 2, 3, etc. Every unit in the SF world has a role to play and none work in isolation.

    • @zandiskoul
      @zandiskoul 6 місяців тому +1

      They shouldn't be competitive at all.

    • @nickanderson7693
      @nickanderson7693 6 місяців тому +1

      Because I'm a couch commander and I want to know, damnit

  • @klmorg63
    @klmorg63 7 місяців тому +6

    I’m 60 years old and for my money I don’t care who did it, Delta or 6, I’m just thankful they are both on our side and out there 24/7 365 days a year protecting America. Are there some “glory hounds”, of course, but that’s a small percentage. In my opinion Delta became famous and known after the Battle of Mogadishu, “black hawk down”, when Randy Shughart and Gary Gordon went to the second crash site and gave their lives to make sure Mike Durant wasn’t alone, LEGENDARY, they both received the Medal Of Honor posthumously!

  • @mikereynolds5753
    @mikereynolds5753 7 місяців тому +5

    Don’t know, don’t care, mission accomplished by great group of professionals, public never needed to know how it went down, except for the politics of finally getting the green light

    • @cm-pr2ys
      @cm-pr2ys 7 місяців тому +2

      For real. People would find something to bitch about if the Army did it.

  • @erics362
    @erics362 7 місяців тому +28

    We all know they weren't even offered (Admiral McRaven's pick).

    • @mrhrobinson
      @mrhrobinson 7 місяців тому +2

      You obviously know nothing at all, lol.

    • @erics362
      @erics362 7 місяців тому +3

      @@mrhrobinson I know how to troll gullible people in UA-cam comments sections.

    • @RocksNRuts4
      @RocksNRuts4 7 місяців тому +2

      none of you know

    • @arighteousname5882
      @arighteousname5882 7 місяців тому +1

      According to the book "Relentless Strike" by Sean Naylor it was alawys going to be Devgru. There was to always be a Troop staged in Afghanistan with the thinking that OBL would be found somewhere along the pak/afghan border region and that the Devgru team would HALO in and conduct the mission

  • @Hiddencomment007
    @Hiddencomment007 7 місяців тому +11

    lot of corruption going on in the seal teams rn.

    • @kareharpies
      @kareharpies 7 місяців тому +2

      Care to expand?

    • @mikeyrodriguez3193
      @mikeyrodriguez3193 7 місяців тому

      Nothing new with them lol

    • @deathfire096
      @deathfire096 7 місяців тому

      and No corruption in the Army units? Do people think before they make up stuff.

    • @mikeyrodriguez3193
      @mikeyrodriguez3193 7 місяців тому

      Of course there is, but not nearly as the corrupt culture issue as in the teams as other branches with units with bad apples, which is why they had top down investigations specifically into what’s plaguing the teams culture problem.

    • @deathfire096
      @deathfire096 7 місяців тому +1

      @odriguez3193 and you know this how? You work with the Army Criminal Investigation Division and compared notes with Naval Criminal Investigative Service? Are you military police, military lawyer or military judge? Why do kids write the dumbest $hiat on the net.

  • @MrDavegiven0330
    @MrDavegiven0330 7 місяців тому +22

    The real answer from McRaven himself (JSOC Commander at the time). He was promoted to CO of US SOCOM later in 2011.
    "Finally, I would have to make a decision on the ground assault element. Would I choose Navy SEALs or Army special operations? There were only two men I trusted well enough to lead the ground operation. Both officers were extremely experienced in combat, both superb tacticians, and most importantly, I felt, both were consummate team players. With all the tension that would invariably develop as a result of this high-profile mission, I needed someone who could calmly build the joint operational team and not get overpressurized when the stakes got high. After checking the Afghanistan deployment schedule, I learned that the Army officer and his squadron had just deployed to Afghanistan. There was no way I could pull the officer and his leadership team out of Afghanistan and bring them back to the States without someone getting wind of a big operation. On the other hand, the Navy SEAL officer and his squadron had just returned from Afghanistan and were on leave for three weeks. Three weeks! It was the perfect cover for action. No one at his command would ask about his whereabouts. No one would miss him at work."

  • @Chertoff88
    @Chertoff88 7 місяців тому +71

    Not true. DEVGRU was picked because they were the unit in the AO. Moving units out of their AO would have caused too much attention. Had Delta been working in the area they would have been chosen.

    • @danielcampbell9457
      @danielcampbell9457 7 місяців тому +31

      Red squadron weren't even in theater. They were in the states. Gold and blue were over seas. So ur wrong about that

    • @JohnDoe69986
      @JohnDoe69986 7 місяців тому +7

      That's why they brought over a whole other squadron?

    • @MrProcivil
      @MrProcivil 7 місяців тому +7

      Were you there when the decision was made? Were you in JSOC?

    • @Taskforceandy
      @Taskforceandy 7 місяців тому +5

      Yeah he said that👌🏼thanks for your input

    • @thedudeabides5
      @thedudeabides5 7 місяців тому +6

      In the book relentless strike, it says that Gold squadron had the trident for that rotation, so it should have been them to do it. But for whatever reason, McRaven pulled red to do the mission.

  • @elanmorintedronai9562
    @elanmorintedronai9562 7 місяців тому +1

    Delta are silent profesionals. Seal team 6? Deepends on the people who went in the spotlight. DJ Shipley is a defenition of a true warrior. Plus, dude never boosted himself or his actions. Always down to earth guy.

  • @leo9er415
    @leo9er415 7 місяців тому +4

    MacRaven said in his book that he wanted delta to run it but the squadron leader was out of country. He trusted another squadron leader who was from seal team six so they took it.

    • @G2Precision
      @G2Precision 9 днів тому

      This not true. We trained at Area 51 for the operation way before the mission. It’s the only operation we trained for and one of the easiest we executed.

    • @austinmarkley1202
      @austinmarkley1202 4 дні тому

      John McPhee said he went home for Christmas so seal team took him

  • @anthonysalandanan59
    @anthonysalandanan59 7 місяців тому +5

    Mcraven had a lot to do with why they went he spoke on there behalf but both could have done it

  • @wade6523
    @wade6523 7 місяців тому +6

    The whole debate is silly.

  • @mrok3405
    @mrok3405 7 місяців тому +2

    This subject has become a circus for $$. Youve got CAG guys dissing Rob for lying and pleading for him to come out with the truth over the killing. Everyones writing a book and glorifying their sales pitch. What tier 1 groups behaves this way? Seriously, its like being in a school yard with teenaged boys chasing a ball. Its so unprofessional and an insult to any tier 1 group. I do not believe US based tier 1 assets are all they're made out to be. Theyre motivated by glory and name. You will find tier 1 SFs in other countries live in complete professional secrecy. They may not have all the bells and whistles but theyre training and delivery is far better in my opinion. Anyone who has served overseas will appreciate this. Polands GROM, Russia's Alpha and also Turkish SAT or MAK are worthy of being noted. Many who served in Iraq and Syria will know that Turkish SFs were in and out all the time right under Russian and US controlled areas. I remember when the Russian propped Assad regime bombed a Turkish base. The response was sharp, swift and enabled Turkey a significant footprint in large areas that they still hold to this day.

    • @tjammo605
      @tjammo605 7 місяців тому +1

      It’s one CAG guy talking out and he’s full of himself

  • @acesvaba330
    @acesvaba330 7 місяців тому +2

    not that I don't trust you, but I trust Admiral McRaven's statement more, and you are not saying the same.

  • @mikewinston8709
    @mikewinston8709 15 днів тому +1

    The British Special Air Service staked out Bin Ladens property in Pakistan. They were based at the British embassy and provided on the ground reconnaissance. This was requested by the USA and no one in the UK SF particularly cared or worried; it was just allied assistance.

  • @bradreed859
    @bradreed859 7 місяців тому +1

    I thought Obama took out bin laden !
    Seal team 6 was tasked with the raid because they were in the rotation ! And also Mcraven is a navy guy !

  • @BxRell
    @BxRell 7 місяців тому +7

    This dude is a Delta fanboy

    • @GOJIRA-Texas
      @GOJIRA-Texas 7 місяців тому +1

      And rightly so. They are the best. I'd say SAS/SBS are second. As the SAS and SBS guys pointed out, Delta gets a lot more money for training and gear and have a lot more resources. Amd then there's the number of real-world missions. At this point, it's no contest. They learned from SAS and have gone to a different level.

    • @SBerg-jm4vz
      @SBerg-jm4vz 7 місяців тому

      More like a Delta "fluffer" for god sake don't ever tell him about the "ted-flag" traing mission in the Philippines where the Marine Raiders took out Tujunga their entire squadren with only 2 lost Raiders. They didn't away cried cheeting and not comparing ROEs....Bull Shit and boo hoo!
      SFMF
      Gunny ret 0323 FOCON
      -Spyder. OohRah!

    • @deathfire096
      @deathfire096 7 місяців тому

      @@GOJIRA-Texas you just made that up. Both are TIER 1 under JSOC. Both get mad money for training. The difference is DEVGRU all are Combat Divers while 1 out of 6 Army SF are. They will never send DELTA to take over a ship on dock or at sea or an oil rig or lock from a submarine anywhere in the world at any given time. That's always DEVGRU. You are dumb.

    • @crusher8017
      @crusher8017 6 місяців тому

      @@deathfire096 You are dumb in pointing out the differences between the two units. It is well known which unit to use for each mission profile. You must be in basic training 101.

    • @deathfire096
      @deathfire096 6 місяців тому

      @@crusher8017 I guess you run JSOC. Lay off the crack.

  • @Gucci_operator
    @Gucci_operator 6 місяців тому +1

    I believe they were chosen because of operation iron eagle in 1986 when SAS had to save USA butt

  • @jiujitsujedi
    @jiujitsujedi 6 місяців тому +1

    Well there are Delta operators that say that it was turned down because there was not enough intel to go on. And the one that made the call to send the seals is a seal fanboy.

  • @jakechaney2565
    @jakechaney2565 7 місяців тому +5

    Also team 6 was already there. I think more than being “fair” the us government was worried bringing in delta could spook obl if he caught wind they were staging nearby.

    • @TheLAGopher
      @TheLAGopher 7 місяців тому +1

      I think the fear was that the ISA (Pakistani intelligence) which has many contacts in Afghanistan and was pretty much sheltering OBL in Pakistan
      would pick it up if DELTA moved back into the theater.
      The CIA/JSOC was likely worried that the ISA would relocate OBL or tighten the security around his home if they got wind of the US planning
      an attack.

    • @bubbaballer88
      @bubbaballer88 7 місяців тому

      @@TheLAGopherISI*

    • @dominicbenecasa7893
      @dominicbenecasa7893 7 місяців тому

      If you were in the military then you know the gov't is NEVER fair, it's politics most of the time, it starts at the full bird promotion on up.

    • @catadjusterZ
      @catadjusterZ 6 місяців тому

      Dude just stop putting your foot in your mouth cool guy. DEVGRU had one squadron already there, but the squadron that was tasked for the UBL raid trained for quite some time stateside

  • @arthurbrumagem3844
    @arthurbrumagem3844 7 місяців тому +7

    Seal team six was chosen because a major book publisher was waiting for a transcript from a seal😂

  • @MrNcgy
    @MrNcgy Місяць тому +1

    Why did one helicopter crash?

  • @mrhrobinson
    @mrhrobinson 3 дні тому

    Delta force cannot turn down a mission, neither can DevGru. Although years ago they used to bid on mission.

  • @Chihuahuauno1
    @Chihuahuauno1 7 місяців тому +1

    SAC/SOG led that raid… . .(shhhhh)

  • @sylvan47070
    @sylvan47070 9 днів тому

    Which country has a coast line? Which country is land-locked? If they had sent CAG, they wouldn't have taken turns mag dumping into the body necessitating the impromptu sea burial.

  • @FMD023
    @FMD023 5 місяців тому +1

    Just imagine if general mccrystal never called Biden Joe bite me. I am sure Devgru wouldn’t have been the ones to taken on this mission. Mccrystal = army general while McRaven = navy admiral, it’s pretty clear once you look at it at that perspective. But David is right, if you hear interviews from a lot of CAG operators, a lot of them talk about putting in a lot of work in Iraq. They went hard on full assaults practically every night raids in Iraq. They were losing a lot of guys due to the massive usage in Iraq. That is a fact.

  • @rezzyn94
    @rezzyn94 7 місяців тому +7

    In 2011
    Afghan largely belonged to Dev
    Iraq largely belonged to CAG
    JSOC Commander was a SEAL at the time. Not too hard to figure out.
    Anyone that says Dev is better than CAG is hilarious 😂😂😂
    Even the (highly capable) 75th could have hit that target and the same EXACT result would have happened

    • @grantbenson5511
      @grantbenson5511 7 місяців тому

      bud, I was in Regiment. Dev is MUCH better than Regiment. At the end of the day, a unit sinks to the lowest level of its members. In batt, this means a PVT fresh out of RASP. You can't train to any higher level than that. That is why tier 1 units take experienced guys. Dev is not like a whiteside SEAL team where they have to stoop to the training of their lowest member which would be a guy fresh out of SQT. There were many complexities to that mission that you have absolutely no clue about. Your comment is enormously disrespectful to the tier 1 elements of the US. Unlike the entire comments section, I have actually worked with both teams. If you think CAG is better than Dev, you're on crack. Both units were phenomenal and we Rangers loved learning from them. P.S. hate to burst your bubble but there are BUD/s quitters in CAG lol. And btw, ik some extremely questionable Rangers who made it to CAG. I'm sure the same can be said for Navy side. Anybody who engages in this debate has a room temperature IQ. And it's embarrassing to see these washed up boomer CAG guys who couldn't do anything outside of the military and are jealous of Dam Neck's attention so they talk crap about them online. DEVGRU and CAG are the same!! This channel is absolutely pathetic. The dude is a clear CAG fanboy and acts like he has access to classified information yet he has no idea what he spews. And the stupid youtube algorithm keeps showing me his trash content which it seems an alarming number of people actually fall for. I was equally blown away by both units and if you ask anyone who's worked with both who doesn't have an axe to grind, you'll get the same answer. And you can bet your ass that there are guys at DEVGRU better than CAG operators and vice versa. Now, in terms of the raid, yes this host finally got something right for once. However, it wasn't out of "fairness." It's just how AORs work. AFG/Pak would've been DEV. Iraq/Syria would've been CAG. Same thing with Yemen and Somalia being DEV. Mali is CAG. Unlike 12 yr olds in the comments section or CAG boomers with an axe to grind, actual Pentagon decision makers view both units as interchangeable equally capable tier 1 assets.

  • @turbogato1
    @turbogato1 7 місяців тому +1

    Who are these people that want to know and why does it matter. If they sent in the Boys Scouts of America and they pulled it off then so be it. This debate about which tier one group is better than the other is stupid. People who read comic books debate that way.

    • @crusher8017
      @crusher8017 6 місяців тому

      That is why I am so tired about the Yanks making units into Tiers. Every unit has a speciality. Very simple.

  • @XaveryNchimbi
    @XaveryNchimbi 7 місяців тому +1

    I hate the direction of this channel now 😞

  • @bubbaballer88
    @bubbaballer88 7 місяців тому +3

    There were also politics at play with SEALs being in high places at the WH, agency, and NSC. This has been acknowledged by multiple SEALs. Also agree that Afghan/Pakistan was their AO.

  • @mattfox2716
    @mattfox2716 14 днів тому

    I’m at the 8 minute mark and my question is this.
    Wouldn’t the end destination (a naval vessel) be an extremely important factor in all this.
    Remember his body was dumped in international waters.
    Point being. The plan was to violate another nations airspace, raid, gather anything important, leave.
    You land back in Afghanistan with his body you would have had more red tape and other factors to deal with.
    Given that these guys are all more or less capable of doing similar things in most areas, wouldn’t that make what little that separates them more important?
    I don’t think fairness or any notion like that really has anything to do with it. Just my 2 cents.

  • @davedave2941
    @davedave2941 7 місяців тому

    Well there are politics I’m sure behind the scenes and who was on rotation at the time blue or green? We also have to account for JSOC and how newly integrated agencies were incorporated into the bull pen as it were - thank Stan Gen. Stan McChrystal for nexus of nexus. Also look at divergence of assets once Iraq War II kicked in and the whole push pull of priorities between AOR1 and AOR2 - just read about TF Jawbreaker we had too few sensors and regional experts in Afghanistan.
    We also have to take into account that at the time NSW have never owned land as combatant commanders till 2010/2011 if I recall correctly - look Navy saw allocation of monies behind FID - the Marines quickly picked up on this after validation in Afghanistan / MARSOC OIF9
    It comes down to combatant commander(s) that owned what land where & funding 💰

  • @bemawr
    @bemawr 7 місяців тому +1

    100% accurate but why are you treating this like you are breaking the news or you are the first person to confirm this? Sean Naylor wrote this in Relentless Strike (2015), Bill O'Riley wrote this in Killing the Killers (2022), McRaven stated this in interviews, Mick Mullroy from GB said this on The Team House ..

  • @mrhrobinson
    @mrhrobinson 3 дні тому

    Yep, it was AOR(Area of Responsibility)

  • @Doughillman
    @Doughillman 5 місяців тому

    It's cute that you think the selection was made based on what was "fair" to the groups. I'm sure, as this mission was being drawn up and they discussed who to task, someone said, "Well, we don't wanna hurt DEVGRU's feelings, so we better pick them." :rolleyes:

  • @6timechamp
    @6timechamp 2 місяці тому

    Sorry David I thought you were claiming delta was offered but turned it down. Your video title says delta force turned it down . Truth revealed my mistake should have watched video first. I jumped the gun when I seen delta turned down the mission

  • @Dreaklock
    @Dreaklock Місяць тому

    How does Delta Force have more of an intel capability than DEVGRU? Both have a dedicated intel squadron.

  • @surfrat8884
    @surfrat8884 6 місяців тому +1

    If true bad choice

  • @jimbartnik
    @jimbartnik 7 місяців тому +2

    Navy Admiral was in charge of JSOC. If it was an Army General it would have been Delta. It was two fold, ST6 was in the AO and the Navy preferred their personnel over Delta.

    • @mrhrobinson
      @mrhrobinson 3 дні тому

      You sound stupid, it was simply AOR.

  • @freeflymonkey
    @freeflymonkey 7 місяців тому

    do ppl really still believe OBL was the mastermind lol...?... no plane wreckage, just perfect passport in the rubble.

  • @BernardEdwards-gu2bo
    @BernardEdwards-gu2bo 14 днів тому

    My mate was in the Australian Army he said regular Infantry are better than SF in certain circumstances

  • @dustyrhodes1655
    @dustyrhodes1655 7 місяців тому

    I was under the impression Delta got Saddam so ST6 got UBL and swear I've heard other Delta guys say the same. Then again I'm some chode on the internet.

  • @PaWhiteTailHunter
    @PaWhiteTailHunter 5 місяців тому

    Dude, stop with these press conferences, you know, as much as anyone who spends 1 hour online. You're killing your channel

  • @theblackjfk8190
    @theblackjfk8190 11 днів тому

    What is the purpose of this channel revealing JSOC secrets

  • @aaronsoutherland364
    @aaronsoutherland364 7 місяців тому

    I suspect it’s not even a consideration of “fair” it’s who has been operating in the AO that has better familiarity with the environment etc. Tye team that conducted the raid was not in country at the time they trained for it stateside and then went in to conduct the specific operation so the team in theatre wasn’t distracted with their daily missions by the train up. Emotionally everyone in uniform wanted to be in on that operation I think that is safe to say for sure.

  • @thomasr302
    @thomasr302 7 місяців тому +1

    Thank you to all of our operators REGARDLESS of branch/unit and all our service members.🇺🇸 Also, thank you for making this video.

  • @Fredroix2
    @Fredroix2 5 місяців тому

    the whole debate is dumb they have the same capability neither one is better. on a individual level there is likely to be some guys better than others and it will vary from team to team squadron to squadron

  • @krazikiddkash
    @krazikiddkash 6 місяців тому

    The difference is you wouldn’t have heard shit about who killed him just pure speculation

  • @Jays-Life82
    @Jays-Life82 21 день тому

    So it got nothing to do that the JSOC commander was a SEAL, huh?

  • @JohnFairchild-w3i
    @JohnFairchild-w3i 7 місяців тому

    As. Far as i. Know. It. Came. As. A. Direct. Order. From a. Big time. Shot-Caller

  • @6.8SuperDutyDriver
    @6.8SuperDutyDriver 7 місяців тому +10

    Yep, when Gen. McChrystal took charge of JSOC, he made DEVGRU the main SMU in Afghanistan and CAG the main SMU in Iraq. He also made them work and deploy together in each AO in small numbers. If it was in Iraq, CAG would've done it.

    • @mrhrobinson
      @mrhrobinson 7 місяців тому +6

      Exactly, it was a matter of Devgru's AOR was Afghanistan and Delta' was iraq.

    • @SomethingOrganic-m7e
      @SomethingOrganic-m7e 7 місяців тому +1

      Looking at the geography of both countries and considering the specialities of each unit, it sounds like they got it exactly backwards.

  • @michaelknight9189
    @michaelknight9189 7 місяців тому +4

    Wasn't it the Army's ODAs and Delta in Afghanistan months before the Seals?

    • @TheLAGopher
      @TheLAGopher 7 місяців тому +1

      Yeah. But went the Iraq War kicked off,DELTA claimed that AO because that was where the action was,while DEVGRU was relegated to Afghanistan
      which was pretty much a backwater theater until Obama made it the primary theater in GWOT around 2010.

    • @abanizergenov8104
      @abanizergenov8104 7 місяців тому +1

      Negative. First in Afghanistan was CIA SAD linking up with the Northern alliance in late September, then in October first ODA teams arrived, shortly after in November on the ground was rangers, seals, British SAS/SBS and other special forces units from different countries. Some seals were attached to SBS and one seal take part in the fighting at Qala I Jangi prison uprising in the end of November 01. Delta and DEVGRU arrived probably at the same time in late November /early December. Delta was send to Tora Bora, but DEVGRU was on standby without much of a action in their way until Operation Anaconda.

    • @GATOR_MCLUSKY
      @GATOR_MCLUSKY 7 місяців тому

      ur correct being a attachment for them in puchi ghar cia was running the show, delta was there and seals and team of green berets@@abanizergenov8104

    • @chrisbrown479
      @chrisbrown479 7 місяців тому

      ODA, was first US Military boots on ground, they took over for CIA

  • @taldozer
    @taldozer 7 місяців тому +1

    AOR ---- Area of responsibility and AO is within the AOR. Otherwise correct ...but this has been known for a long time.

  • @ajcook7777
    @ajcook7777 7 місяців тому +1

    3:55 ur welcome

  • @Hack_CM
    @Hack_CM 7 днів тому

    Nearly 10 minutes to say one sentence. Heroic.

  • @MarcLombart
    @MarcLombart 7 місяців тому +2

    Your volume way too low. Even at mx I can't hear you

  • @sluggak1363
    @sluggak1363 7 місяців тому

    Naw delta aint want to be killed later on by domestic planned shooters

  • @onebadmoto5081
    @onebadmoto5081 7 місяців тому

    Yeah that’s not what happened. He favored navy seals and that is fact

  • @shaunthomas2184
    @shaunthomas2184 6 місяців тому

    Afghanistan was DEVGRU's battlespace, Iraq was Deltas. There was always a DEVGRU squadron in Afghanistan during the war. It had nothing to do with either being chosen.

  • @jakehansen3418
    @jakehansen3418 7 місяців тому +1

    What makes sense to me is seal team 6 within weeks was opening up and telling anyone who would listen about the raid whole delta wouldn't have and Obama wanted info out there wanted this to be talked about to death it was one of his greatest achievements.

    • @kareharpies
      @kareharpies 6 місяців тому

      This is true. I lived in NYC all my life and felt the towers drop while taking a math test. I'll never forget the day the Bin Laden announcement came over the news. I felt jubiliation, then relief, then I felt weightless like i could be or do anything I wanted. I wasn't a child, but I was still young, and I imagined this being my achievement. I never felt so much goodwill towards everybody in the succeeding days; they weren't strangers but my fellow americans- we did this! I wanted to know more, but dad said the type of heroes who fight these types of crimes dont wear capes or have bat signals. Ultimately, the heroes did identify themselves lol, and people were pissed but I was thankful 😅. And I'm 50/50 on Obama but I was ever so happy with him because we had Bin Laden once before and the Bush administration didn't pull the trigger. Ironically, it was the delta boys. So yeah one of Obama's greatest achievements.

    • @catadjusterZ
      @catadjusterZ 6 місяців тому

      Shut up dude. Funny shit, I promise you would not say any of this drivel to any DEVGRU member

  • @linocatucci
    @linocatucci 7 місяців тому +3

    sound is terrible,

  • @tattoochef
    @tattoochef 7 місяців тому +1

    I heard that devgru got the job because delta was deployed and pulling them off would have raised eyebrows.

    • @deathfire096
      @deathfire096 7 місяців тому

      Both are deployed all the time. Both are tier 1 under JSOC. Does it matter which TIER 1 JSOC used? Why are people crying? is not like there was a lack of killing and destruction during both wars.

  • @MsPatriotfront
    @MsPatriotfront 7 місяців тому +1

    Who is behind turning down Dave's microphone?

  • @M4A1BestGirl
    @M4A1BestGirl 5 місяців тому

    Delta being a good sport to their brothers in arms as always.
    If any Delta Force member is reading this, respect to you guys. Thank you for your service 🫡

  • @BlakeChaney-z5c
    @BlakeChaney-z5c 7 місяців тому

    Was this video really necessary?

  • @hnguye22
    @hnguye22 6 місяців тому

    Vice Chair of Chief of Staff was the Seal. He lets his guy. No way hell, SEAL guys coming to the compound and taking of Osama unless security is extra heavy by Delta, Rangers, and Green Beret.

  • @thomaskeller5699
    @thomaskeller5699 7 місяців тому

    Put it to rest guys, fake news

  • @211212112
    @211212112 7 місяців тому

    I'd like to see a series of CTF between each DEVGRU squad, Delta, Etc to see which group really is tops. Then take the top two guys from each squad among all tier 1 operators and make a tier Z (Zed) force that could own every DEVGRU and Delta squad.
    Also, the area wasn't Red Teams AO. It was another squads, but they didn't want to pull that squad off nightly OPs cause reasons. Red Team just happened to have been rotated ack to the US. They choose Red Team cause they could be isolated at area 51 to train in the specially prepared kill house without anyone missing them, without having to shuffle anyone around, without changing deployment schedules etc, and of course they have the skills for it
    And those are the the reasons Red Team was tapped for the operation.

  • @CoffeeFiend1
    @CoffeeFiend1 7 місяців тому

    Delta and ISA are the quiet deniable chaps that no one hears about. Obviously this wouldn't be something ISA would do but the principle remains true. Success or failure this would have created a lot of publicity, this is definitely a factor why they chose SEALs as even 6/devgru are quite well known in popular culture. Whether they like it or not SEALs do often get used to shift awareness off other units. It's a good thing too. All countries need some units that are kept under wraps properly and out of the public eye.

  • @L11ghtman
    @L11ghtman 7 місяців тому

    May 2011, also the last time the Army was in any positive media about the military ever lol. The Marines and SEALs are eating the Army's lunch these days. If I had a quarter for every time someone on Reddit or UA-cam has told me "The Marines are America's offense, the Army is an occupational force that comes in later" I'd be a rich man.