The UK has always had the sovereign right to leave the EEC/EU. The UK is a signatory of the UN Vienna Convention on Treaties 1969. Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty to terminate membership, was just a restatement of Article 70 of Vienna convention, formerly setting out the length of notice required to leave - 2 years, unless all the parties agree to extend. Before Lisbon the right to leave, 12 months' notice was considered acceptable in international law, and there are a whole raft of termination Articles that could've been used as well to terminate with immediate effect, would still require an Act of parliament to consent.
While it is true that only parliament has the sovereign powers to strike down/repeal a law, juries have the power to effectively nullify laws, when juries fail to convict (Bushel case established juries as independent of the judiciary to have final say). The law may continue on the statutes until parliament repeals it, but prosecutors and CPS will often drop cases they believe juries won't convict.
This is full of misrepresentation. The Courts make the Law of the Land, they check the legality of the legislative law. We have the common law, statute, customs, and common law being the law of the land. The UK Constitution tells us we should not have joined, hence all the problems now. Parliament is not a sovereign lawmaker. Dicy misquoted he even admits Parliament is not sovereign. The Bill of Rights is the contract and limits legislation making. Parliamentary sovereignty does not stand up to scrutiny logic history or reason. Handing power to any foreign power is unlawful. It's very annoying listening to these people, who are very intelligent but been taught a polluted education on the constitution.
Nice and easy to understand. Thank you.
The UK has always had the sovereign right to leave the EEC/EU. The UK is a signatory of the UN Vienna Convention on Treaties 1969. Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty to terminate membership, was just a restatement of Article 70 of Vienna convention, formerly setting out the length of notice required to leave - 2 years, unless all the parties agree to extend.
Before Lisbon the right to leave, 12 months' notice was considered acceptable in international law, and there are a whole raft of termination Articles that could've been used as well to terminate with immediate effect, would still require an Act of parliament to consent.
While it is true that only parliament has the sovereign powers to strike down/repeal a law, juries have the power to effectively nullify laws, when juries fail to convict (Bushel case established juries as independent of the judiciary to have final say). The law may continue on the statutes until parliament repeals it, but prosecutors and CPS will often drop cases they believe juries won't convict.
Tentunya bidamg hukum juga bisa digali sebagai komoditas publik yang bisa memberikan keuntungan dari sisi permodelan layanan.
This is full of misrepresentation.
The Courts make the Law of the Land, they check the legality of the legislative law.
We have the common law, statute, customs, and common law being the law of the land.
The UK Constitution tells us we should not have joined, hence all the problems now.
Parliament is not a sovereign lawmaker. Dicy misquoted he even admits Parliament is not sovereign.
The Bill of Rights is the contract and limits legislation making.
Parliamentary sovereignty does not stand up to scrutiny logic history or reason.
Handing power to any foreign power is unlawful.
It's very annoying listening to these people, who are very intelligent but been taught a polluted education on the constitution.
Thank yaw
This is weird!!!