Moving Average (MA) Models| Time Series Forecasting #3|

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 17 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ •

  • @prathkothari5731
    @prathkothari5731 4 місяці тому

    Man, I have never understood Time Series so smoothly. Thanks!

  • @omzka6564
    @omzka6564 2 роки тому +5

    Your explanations are terrific - simple and straight to the point. Thanks alot for this smooth style!

  • @vigneshrammohan979
    @vigneshrammohan979 3 роки тому +2

    i love u man...my proff had phd and is twice your age but his explanation was no where near your's..

  • @dentrifications
    @dentrifications 2 роки тому +1

    I don't usually comment on videos. But this one is a Great video

  • @abstract_machine
    @abstract_machine 2 роки тому +4

    You never explained why c1 is 0.5
    Did you choose it randomly ? Is it the y intercept ?
    Why 0.5, why not another value, like a whole number ? What about negative numbers?

    • @alx8439
      @alx8439 2 роки тому +4

      It's just a coefficient of how seriously we shoud be considered error from the previous step.
      -0.5 means we will take the prediction error from the previous step and consider to move our next prediction towards the half of the error value.
      To be honest, with all the love to the channel owner, he is explaining things in a very clumsy way

  • @guccikom7958
    @guccikom7958 4 роки тому +2

    Thank you for the video, sir, how do you get the error for the current prediction "et" when you havent made the prediction yet?

  • @PraveenKumar-pd9sx
    @PraveenKumar-pd9sx 3 роки тому +1

    Hi, why do we use Acf plot lags for Moving average order and Pacf plot lags for Auto regression order?

  • @chanpreet4490
    @chanpreet4490 9 місяців тому +1

    Nice explanation

  • @ashwin_.0710
    @ashwin_.0710 2 роки тому

    Does a negative value for Pearson's coefficient indicate a reverse proportionality or does it mean that there is no relation/dependency between the variables considered?
    What happens if in the ACF/PACF plot the graph extends to the negative axis beyond the error band? How do you take that into the order consideration?

  • @advisoryaccount
    @advisoryaccount Рік тому

    in the last example: the predicction value for 4th n 5th itergation are 7 and 7.5 , but in graph its 10 and 9??

  • @AaronRosenbaum-b4l
    @AaronRosenbaum-b4l Рік тому

    Excellent explanation!!

  • @edavar6265
    @edavar6265 2 роки тому +1

    How do we know the current error (epsilon t) if we are forecasting the current value?

    • @abhishekjayant9733
      @abhishekjayant9733 11 місяців тому

      Just figured it out, y(t) is the actual value, and ŷ (t) is the predicted value. ŷ (t) = c1*E(t-1) + c2*. However, the actual value is the predicted value plus the error at that time which is E(t) so y(t) = ŷ (t) + E(t) = c1*E(t-1) + c2* + E(t)

  • @shubhamgadhari1120
    @shubhamgadhari1120 3 роки тому

    Thanks bhai .Explained it very clearly

  • @manideepgupta2433
    @manideepgupta2433 3 роки тому +1

    Hey, Hi I cant see your video part 2, it shows private video?

    • @NachiketaHebbar
      @NachiketaHebbar  3 роки тому +2

      Yeah, I had received a copyright claim on it because of the intro music used. I will reupload it tomorrow.

    • @manideepgupta2433
      @manideepgupta2433 3 роки тому +1

      @@NachiketaHebbar thanks man!! Wonderful explanation and inspiring as well!

    • @hemantdhoundiyal1327
      @hemantdhoundiyal1327 3 роки тому

      @@NachiketaHebbar You haven't uploaded it till now, please upload

    • @NachiketaHebbar
      @NachiketaHebbar  3 роки тому

      I already uploaded it 4 days back

  • @gaunollakalpana7866
    @gaunollakalpana7866 3 роки тому

    Superb explanation!!

  • @TheRohit9463
    @TheRohit9463 3 роки тому

    excellent content!

  • @Jas-l9q
    @Jas-l9q Рік тому +2

    why 0.5

  • @Pursuit_of_Insights
    @Pursuit_of_Insights 2 роки тому

    clear explanation

  • @avinashvamshi9065
    @avinashvamshi9065 3 роки тому

    Why is mean 4 here?

  • @kushgirap6146
    @kushgirap6146 3 роки тому

    part 2?

  • @pouriaforouzesh5349
    @pouriaforouzesh5349 2 роки тому

    👍