i was starting to note your slides. but then i realized there's tons of grammatical mistake. please improve on your English. other than that everything was fine.
I was pretty young at that time, and it's totally fine to make grammatical errors at a young age. Like you did here. You started your sentence with 'i', but it should start with 'I' (capital I), and it would be 'there were' and not "there's". Also, it would be 'mistakes', not 'mistake', and please don't forget to add commas with your sentence. Thankyou:-)
@@ravichoudhary1014 kyun nahin hai important Fir court mein jaa kar appeal ka apple karna tum bhi Refinement of language is something that distinguishes a good lawyer from others It’s not about the accent, it’s about saying a word completely wrong. A word like monar’ch’ doesn’t exist in English And there’s nothing wrong in learning things
@@Rayis4444 agr ague aur cross examination skills hi nai honge tho kya karega bichara jiske behalf k case ladega wo haar jayega case tb angrezi bhi kaam nai ayega bhale Banda foreign accent leke bak bak kare court me
@@ravichoudhary1014 No one said it is the only thing necessary. It’s one of the things. Any lawyer can tell you the value of good language in drafting and arguing. Saying something precisely and accurately is an art. If it were not, there would not be mandatory language papers in competitive exams including Judiciary exams. It creates a good impression if you speak correctly and accurately. If you have read the Interpretation of Statutes, you would know how essential it is to have a grip on language. And it’s not about English, it’s about any language. Putting your knowledge out in a correct manner is essential. And understanding of legal language and general language is crucial even for arguing. Cross examination is also a game of how you can frame your words correctly, how you can say the right thing to get the answer that you want, how you can frame a precise leading question. Good language is one of the basics.
Thanks sir
Very helpful sir
Thank you so much, for your explanation
Thank u 💞
Excellent video sir .
Excellent video
5:24 Equity under English Legal law
Thnk u
Very informative. Thankyou for your efforts.
good
10:20 Indian
Thank you so much sir 🙏🏼
Bhot acha padhaya
Thankyou bhai
❤+😂=🎉
Thanku so much for sharing this 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏its really helpful
Nice explanation!
Excellent brother ❤️
Sir bohot acha padhate bo aap sir .👌👌👍👍👍
Thanky so much bhai
10:20
Your lecture is awesome ❣️
Histroy ke upar notes mil sakta hai kya
Wase thank you so much it is really a helpful video if sir u have notes regarding can you provide me
Excellent video, Vansh u doing great job !It helped alot in exam today .
Gajab bhai.👍👌👌
Thank you so much respect you from pakistan...thanks for backgrounf of eng ..
Very nice.. Keep it up👌👌
Beautiful, kindly explain 5 legal acts administered under Roman law., i will be greately obliged.
Next video kb daloge
very well explained
Sir
I urge you to give the historical background of equity here separately from the common law and English law
Nice explanation....can u tell me d name of book?
Sir equity ke aur video upload kariye sir
👍👍👍
i was starting to note your slides. but then i realized there's tons of grammatical mistake. please improve on your English. other than that everything was fine.
I was pretty young at that time, and it's totally fine to make grammatical errors at a young age. Like you did here. You started your sentence with 'i', but it should start with 'I' (capital I), and it would be 'there were' and not "there's". Also, it would be 'mistakes', not 'mistake', and please don't forget to add commas with your sentence.
Thankyou:-)
@@lawbyvanshbatra😂😂
@lawbyvanshbatra perfect reply
It is pronounced as monar’k’ not monar’ch’
Good video
Thank you 🙏
Pronunciation galat h ye ye important nai hai sir hame samja rahe h ye important h
@@ravichoudhary1014 kyun nahin hai important
Fir court mein jaa kar appeal ka apple karna tum bhi
Refinement of language is something that distinguishes a good lawyer from others
It’s not about the accent, it’s about saying a word completely wrong. A word like monar’ch’ doesn’t exist in English
And there’s nothing wrong in learning things
@@Rayis4444 lkin mere language and accent can't decide one's capabilities of arguing and cross examining in court of law
@@Rayis4444 agr ague aur cross examination skills hi nai honge tho kya karega bichara jiske behalf k case ladega wo haar jayega case tb angrezi bhi kaam nai ayega bhale Banda foreign accent leke bak bak kare court me
@@ravichoudhary1014 No one said it is the only thing necessary. It’s one of the things. Any lawyer can tell you the value of good language in drafting and arguing. Saying something precisely and accurately is an art. If it were not, there would not be mandatory language papers in competitive exams including Judiciary exams. It creates a good impression if you speak correctly and accurately. If you have read the Interpretation of Statutes, you would know how essential it is to have a grip on language. And it’s not about English, it’s about any language. Putting your knowledge out in a correct manner is essential. And understanding of legal language and general language is crucial even for arguing. Cross examination is also a game of how you can frame your words correctly, how you can say the right thing to get the answer that you want, how you can frame a precise leading question. Good language is one of the basics.