Leica 8-18mm -BEST wide zoom for Lumix?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 16 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 88

  • @robinwong
    @robinwong 5 років тому +16

    One of my favourite lenses from Panasonic!

  • @sutv6754
    @sutv6754 4 роки тому +1

    Thanks Matt. I watched this about 6 months ago and bought it. Now this is like a whole new lesson since back then.

  • @gcprost
    @gcprost 10 місяців тому +2

    I have this lens. I don't have a lot of complaints about it but I'm a little jealous of the Olympus 8-25 mm. The extended range would be very handy.

  • @TheQuietBeast
    @TheQuietBeast 3 роки тому +1

    Kiitos Matti! Great review. I just bought this over the soon to come 8-25/4. Think this one suits me better. Will be most exciting!

  • @aengusmacnaughton1375
    @aengusmacnaughton1375 5 років тому +2

    Thank you! I'll have to make due with my Lumix 12-60 (non-Leica) and my manual focus 8mm SLR Magic lens (great lens) -- this 8-18mm costs as much as my G85 when I bought it new!!! But thank you for checking it out -- having the elements stay behind the filter threads for the whole range is great -- it'd be nice for other lenses to do the same.

  • @TITAOSTEIN
    @TITAOSTEIN 4 роки тому +10

    A very good lens indeed! But for me, in my use, the best ultra wide lens is the Olympus 7-14mm f2.8. For two basic reasons! 7mm (against 8mm) on the wide side is more important to me than 18mm (against 14mm). After all it is an Ultra Wide! The constant aperture f2.8 is also an advantage. For those who need to use a filter, such as ND, for example, Leica is the best choice (except for those who own the Em1x and Em1 m3, as they are cameras with integrated ND). But either way, it's great to have such good options! That's why I love M43! Thanks for the video! Greetings from the Black Forest!

    • @GrenlandUnderVann
      @GrenlandUnderVann 2 роки тому +1

      The downside of the Oly 7-14 is the flaring which is really bad with sun from the sides.

  • @wcbibb
    @wcbibb 4 роки тому +2

    I bought the 8-18mm and G9. I took some interesting photographs of Morro Bay, Point Lobos, and Big Sur. I could screw in a variable polarizing filter. I'm heading out to the desert for landscapes there. It makes a great addition to my lens collection.

  • @Filmmaker809
    @Filmmaker809 5 років тому +2

    Good review. Look forward to seeing the new Panasonic Wide angle 10-25mm F1.7 lens when it comes out.

    • @mattisulanto
      @mattisulanto  5 років тому +1

      Thanks. Me too, I want to try the 10-25mm as soon as it comes out.

  • @veganbodybuilding
    @veganbodybuilding 5 років тому +3

    I went for the 7-14mm in the end, but I did really consider this one as well. I needed the extra width though and I am happy with the 7-14 so far.

  • @BarryMaskell
    @BarryMaskell 5 років тому +6

    Thanks for doing this video - Panasonic should give you the very first 10-25 f1.7 to test - you do an excellent job of reviewing gear

  • @MrSteveCee
    @MrSteveCee 4 роки тому +1

    Really appreciate your reviews! Thanks!

  • @michaels3003
    @michaels3003 4 роки тому +2

    Matti, FYI only, I've been increasing your thumb-up counts as I watch your videos.

  • @RonaldBrown59
    @RonaldBrown59 4 роки тому +2

    Great review, I’m considering buying this lens for video.

  • @abdullahmazin2963
    @abdullahmazin2963 4 роки тому +2

    Can I Get blur background from this lens ? Especially by 18mm

    • @mattisulanto
      @mattisulanto  4 роки тому +2

      Yes, it's possible, if you shoot wide open and at close distances. But of course, this lens is no the best bokeh maker.

    • @AiurMedia
      @AiurMedia 3 роки тому

      it's about as good as lumix 12-60mm f3.5-5.6, so not much bokeh

  • @aalialynn
    @aalialynn 3 місяці тому +1

    Hi, amazing vid!! Is there any lens adapter that would allow me to connect this 8-18 lens to the s5iix? 🧐

  • @hoggif
    @hoggif 4 роки тому +2

    I like the lens. It is good. I need filters for video work. That is a must. No NDs is so great a thing for video to me. Any lens that does not take filters is useless to me.
    My dream lens would have image stabilization (not that important at 8mm but at very low light and 18mm it could come handy when you need dual stabilization or on a body without IBIS). I would really prefer constant aperture. That put me off a long time from this lens. Anything faster than F2.8 like F2.0 would make a huge deal at low light. That drives me sometimes to Sigma 18-35 with Metabones.

  • @michaels3003
    @michaels3003 4 роки тому

    I am watching this a year later, but I'd like to say that I really like your photos taken with this lens.

  • @TheJazzPG
    @TheJazzPG 4 роки тому +1

    Hi Matti, I just bought this 8-18mm to my G95. I like to use sometimes a couple of filters in other lens. Do you have some suggestion to ND and Polariser filters to this one? Thanks a lot for your channel.. I'm a big fan! :-)

    • @mattisulanto
      @mattisulanto  4 роки тому

      I don't use much filters, but for video I use the Nisi Pro-Nano ND-Vario and that is an excellent filter. If I was buying another filter, a polarizer for example, I'd probably buy Nisi, because I have good experience with their ND.

  • @lightbox617
    @lightbox617 4 місяці тому +1

    bought a used (excellent condition) G7 a few months ageo. I am replacing my Canon 80ds. largely because I'm 76 and they are just too damn heavy for travel.. I am trying to cover the full range that I get with three lenses; 10to 24, 24 to 70 and 70 to 300. I'm looking for used equipment and while mu Lumis came with a 45 to 15 and a 14 to 40. I need an ultra wide. I'm busilly shopping for a good used 7 to 14 and I ned to watch the cost.

  • @Paul_anderson_creative
    @Paul_anderson_creative 5 років тому +1

    I love and use the 7-14.. No need for filters. Super architectural lens! Cheers...

    • @mattisulanto
      @mattisulanto  5 років тому +1

      Thanks! That's another great wide zoom.

  • @juliosang7167
    @juliosang7167 2 роки тому +1

    Thanks for the video, very informative. What's a good lens for video for a MFT camera like the new GH6? Thinking of doing some Vlogging, like the image. Thanks!

    • @mattisulanto
      @mattisulanto  2 роки тому

      Here is a video for you: ua-cam.com/video/pVM7BzaY4ms/v-deo.html You should also consider the relatively new Panasonic Leica 9mm F1.7.

  • @fireball2004
    @fireball2004 3 роки тому +1

    Hey Matti. Quick question as you are one of the only UA-camrs I know with this lens and a G95. When vlogging with this combo, will the corners warp and produce that "jello" effect? I heard that this problem was fixed for the GH5 and G9, but don't know how it'll act with the G95. =)

    • @mattisulanto
      @mattisulanto  3 роки тому

      I have to disappoint you, I have not used that combo for vlogging, so I can't say how it works.

    • @fireball2004
      @fireball2004 3 роки тому +1

      @@mattisulanto Awh man.. Oh well. Thanks for taking the time to reply anyways. =) Your lens reviews have been my go to source of review for a while now.

  • @AnandaSim
    @AnandaSim 5 років тому +2

    I'd love this lens for stills. The 18mm is close to normal FOV so don't have to swap lens unlike the 7-14mm. The Olympus 9-18mm over the years I have tried at the shops but can't seem to buy - optically I feel it isn't as impressive

    • @mattisulanto
      @mattisulanto  5 років тому +1

      That range is indeed very useful and 2mm means a lot.

  • @mokujin29
    @mokujin29 4 роки тому +2

    Love that T shirt.

  • @talgatmendibaev
    @talgatmendibaev 4 роки тому +2

    Nice review. Is laowa 7.5mm f2 a good alternative?

    • @mattisulanto
      @mattisulanto  4 роки тому

      Thanks! The Laowa is a prime and the Leica is a zoom, so I don't think they are direct alternatives. I have a review of the Laowa 7.5mm F2, please search my channel. It's good lens.

    • @talgatmendibaev
      @talgatmendibaev 4 роки тому

      @@mattisulanto im beginner. I have g85 with kit lense 12-65. After this i got 20mm f1.7 and 12-35 f2.8. Now i want wide lense . Which one would you suggest?

    • @mattisulanto
      @mattisulanto  4 роки тому

      @@talgatmendibaev It really depends on what you plan to use the wide for. If you want a zoom then the Leica 8-18mm is a good choice and if you are happy with a manual focus prime, the the Laowa 7.5mm could work. I have the Leica 8-18mm and I'm very happy with that.

  • @Metaldetectiontubeworldwide
    @Metaldetectiontubeworldwide 4 роки тому +1

    Have it now 2 weeks i used it daily for vlogging my treasure hunting videos ...love it !
    Only the lens cap i realy struggle to get it on ..🤔
    Mayby the if i put it at 8mm it go better , didn't knew it extended 🤣🙌

  • @arifkizilay
    @arifkizilay 4 роки тому +2

    hi, I wonder how it is for black and white photography. thank you.

    • @mattisulanto
      @mattisulanto  4 роки тому

      I'm not sure what you mean, but black and white is no problem with this lens.

  • @bandofbros8112
    @bandofbros8112 5 років тому +1

    I am selling my panasonic 12-35mm ii, not sure if I should get this one for more wide results or get the 12mm f/1.4 for more low light and bokeh ability.

    • @mattisulanto
      @mattisulanto  5 років тому

      You just have to decide what you want😀

    • @StudioBonn
      @StudioBonn 5 років тому

      I bought the 12mm 1.4 and it is amazing in any way. But now I'm looking for that 8-18mm... I think this is a really first world problem, isn't it? 😇

  • @mgr5550
    @mgr5550 4 роки тому +1

    Hi, is this lens perfectly rectilinear for video work just like the 7-14mm panny lens is ? Also does the f2.8 give an advantage for brighter shots in slightly low light interior shoots ? (using a G7 as the body)

    • @mattisulanto
      @mattisulanto  4 роки тому

      It's rectilinear and F2.8 gives one stop advantage compared to F4. It's the same as increasing ISO from 200 to 400.

    • @mgr5550
      @mgr5550 4 роки тому

      @@mattisulanto > Thanks a lot.

  • @Noealz
    @Noealz 5 років тому +2

    some lovely glass : )

  • @eltinjones4542
    @eltinjones4542 Рік тому +1

    I shoot Full Frame, APSC and MF3.
    Let's be honest even though the latter is lighter and more convenient for moving around, the quality of image is not as good as the former two.
    The price of this lens is rediculus for cameras with such a small sensor in my openion. I went for the Laowa 7.5 who's image is good enough for the mf3 srnsor and does the job at ultra? Wide angle 📷👍

    • @mattisulanto
      @mattisulanto  Рік тому

      Thanks for sharing. I'm really happy you found the perfect ultra wide for you purposes.

  • @techgat3keeper879
    @techgat3keeper879 3 роки тому +1

    Can you put square filter system with this lens?

  • @MichaelDemetriusGR
    @MichaelDemetriusGR 3 роки тому +1

    Do you have distortion in the corner? My copy has..

    • @mattisulanto
      @mattisulanto  3 роки тому +1

      No distortion. However, if you use a RAW developer, that does not support lens profiles or software correction, you will see distortion.

  • @joakimtollerud2172
    @joakimtollerud2172 5 років тому +1

    Do you still recommend this for landscape and architure photography? I have the Leica 12-60.

    • @mattisulanto
      @mattisulanto  5 років тому +1

      It's great lens and if you need a wide zoom for whatever use, I'd recommend this one.

    • @joakimtollerud2172
      @joakimtollerud2172 5 років тому

      sulantoblog do you also hear the autofocus when filming? I do.

    • @mattisulanto
      @mattisulanto  5 років тому

      @@joakimtollerud2172 I have had no issues with the AF noise, but I use always some kind of external microphone.

    • @joakimtollerud2172
      @joakimtollerud2172 5 років тому

      sulantoblog but if you put your ear next to lens you hear the autofocus working quite clearly? Just wondering if my lens is defective.

    • @mattisulanto
      @mattisulanto  5 років тому

      @@joakimtollerud2172 There is a motor inside and moving parts, so some noise is inevitable and you can hear it, if you have the lens up to your ear. But, I can't say anything about your lens, because I don't know what kind of noise you hear.

  • @StudioBonn
    @StudioBonn 4 роки тому +1

    Thanks for 07:08 ... 👍

  • @SMOKEYoriginalHD
    @SMOKEYoriginalHD 5 років тому +1

    Is there a big difference between using this lens on G90 and GH5 in photography?

    • @mattisulanto
      @mattisulanto  5 років тому +1

      You are going to get the same results what comes to the lens no matter which Lumix camera you use.

    • @SMOKEYoriginalHD
      @SMOKEYoriginalHD 5 років тому

      @@mattisulanto That's true, was just wondering when G90 is primary made for photography if there are any changes. Otherwise G90 is using the same sensor like GH5 if I'm correct.

    • @mattisulanto
      @mattisulanto  5 років тому

      As far as I can tell the photo quality looks the same on both cameras. The sensor is probably the same 20Mp unit.

    • @SMOKEYoriginalHD
      @SMOKEYoriginalHD 5 років тому +1

      @@mattisulanto Yes, its same 20Mp. Thanks :)

  • @RockyColaFizz
    @RockyColaFizz 5 років тому

    I have this lens. Only odd thing on my G9 is weird warp in video. It does this odd warp effect on the left and right edges of the frame.

    • @aengusmacnaughton1375
      @aengusmacnaughton1375 5 років тому +2

      This has been noticed on Panasonic MFT cameras (possibly on other brands) when IBIS is on and the lens is a wide-angle or super-wide -- I'd say 14mm or wider. It looks like there is some interaction between the IBIS and the lens correction where the lens correction moves the image at the same time as the IBIS is trying to correct for motion. I definitely see this on my G85 at the 12mm end of my 12-60mm. I have not really seen it on my 25mm Lumix, 40-150mm Lumix or 42.5mm Lumix lenses. And I tried to make it happen on my manual-focus 8mm SLR Magic lens and I barely saw it. I presume because the camera does not have any lens-compensation routine for this non-Panasonic lens. A quick way to test is turn off IBIS, set you lens to the widest setting, and walk around shooting video (try 50/60fps or higher) -- but try to walk smoothly -- pan the camera and gently move the camera up and down. I think that with the IBIS off you should not get the "warping."

    • @tattoobillyvon9764
      @tattoobillyvon9764 5 років тому

      The Liquid Valium you have stabilator off?

    • @RockyColaFizz
      @RockyColaFizz 5 років тому +1

      @@aengusmacnaughton1375 Great tip. I will try that. Thx!

  • @andersistbesser
    @andersistbesser 4 роки тому +1

    this lense does not stand a chance against the 7-14 2.8 from olympus. the oly is wider has weather sealing and a constant 2.8 no reason to buy the leica. for shooting real estate i dont need filters but 7mm are very useful

    • @mattisulanto
      @mattisulanto  4 роки тому +2

      It depends how you look at it. The Zuiko doesn’t stand a chance, because the Leica can use filters, it reaches 18mm and is also weather sealed. In video I need filters and 8mm is wide enough😀

  • @LarsKiel
    @LarsKiel 5 років тому +1

    👍

  • @JefeBoss
    @JefeBoss 5 років тому +1

    Sorry but, even though I'm a Lumix shooter, my Oly 7-14 f2.8 Pro all the way. Also, 1200€ for a variable aperture is a huge laugh from Panasonic...

  • @chrstphrdyer
    @chrstphrdyer 4 роки тому +2

    THE porn lens

  • @alexverbeke2228
    @alexverbeke2228 4 роки тому +1

    Real photographers don't need a t-shirt saying what real photographers need or not ;) .

    • @mattisulanto
      @mattisulanto  4 роки тому +6

      Maybe real photographers also have some sense of humor😀