Where Does Electric Charge Come From?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 6 вер 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 912

  • @ScienceAsylum
    @ScienceAsylum  4 роки тому +240

    *Clarification:* When I define Noether's theorem at 1:52, the text on the screen is correct. However, there's a subtle disconnect between the broad conceptual language and the strict mathematical language of Noether's theorem that makes what I say out loud misleading. It would seem the math of Noether's theorem only applies to _continuous_ symmetries. There are _discrete_ symmetries that also result in conserved quantities, but are not due to Noether's theorem in the strictest mathematical sense. #LanguageIsHard

    • @jacobkrebs5026
      @jacobkrebs5026 4 роки тому +2

      Why can we apply noethers theorem, isn't it only defined on Euclidean spaces?

    • @AlleyKatt
      @AlleyKatt 4 роки тому +13

      Seems to me... if you were wanting to convey a strict understanding of Noether's theorem then you would've gone heavy on the maths. But you were going for understanding a concept, so the only way I can truly consider your words to be "misleading" is if I'm just trying to be a ∆!¢k about it.

    • @erikawanner7355
      @erikawanner7355 4 роки тому +1

      #quarantineinvariance

    • @michaeldamolsen
      @michaeldamolsen 4 роки тому +4

      Nothing to worry too much about, but I applaud the fact that you mention it :)
      I think the video was mind blowing enough without a discussion of Ward-Takahashi identities, but maybe something for a future video?

    • @yuotwob3091
      @yuotwob3091 4 роки тому

      It's gone too far to go back.

  • @lorenzocimino2827
    @lorenzocimino2827 4 роки тому +157

    Honestly, as a Physics major, it's one of the best educational video about gauge invariance

    • @davidhand9721
      @davidhand9721 4 роки тому +1

      You like this one more than PBS Space Time?

    • @brilliaurabillah8974
      @brilliaurabillah8974 4 роки тому

      but it seems more understandable for wide (i mean people who not take physics major) audience than pbs space time

    • @Hardzinho_Yay
      @Hardzinho_Yay 4 роки тому +5

      @@davidhand9721 I think this one is better than what PBS spacetime did (and I think PBS did a good job). The lectures about this are usually terrible.

    • @dannyj4858
      @dannyj4858 4 роки тому +2

      What are you doing knowing gauge invariance as a physics major lol

    • @DANGJOS
      @DANGJOS 2 роки тому +1

      In what physics major are you learning gauge invariance? Seems like a graduate topic

  • @constantinandro684
    @constantinandro684 4 роки тому +126

    I like how this channel goes into deep concepts. A lot of science channels scratches only the surface so that it's more digestible to the masses.

  • @juanfromthecosmos
    @juanfromthecosmos 4 роки тому +226

    We had the meme:"Actually, Quantum Mechanics forbid this". Now, we have the new one!: "Quantum Mechanics requires this!"

    • @6900xx
      @6900xx 4 роки тому +6

      I came to comment section as soon as I heard him saying that 😂

    • @s3cr3tpassword
      @s3cr3tpassword 4 роки тому

      Yea he even made it into a meme format with the placement of the words and choice of fonts too!

    • @jasonremy1627
      @jasonremy1627 4 роки тому +5

      Wasn't it Gell-Mann or someone like that who said something like "That which is not forbidden is mandatory" when referring to quantum mechanics...

    • @ronaldderooij1774
      @ronaldderooij1774 4 роки тому

      It's the virus that requires and forbids everything nowadays. The universe has changed.

    • @mtslybot78
      @mtslybot78 4 роки тому

      @@ronaldderooij1774 its changing. always is. the footprint left by the common experience in the moment can't be predicted, and often is not as impactful, or the impact subverts expectation, in retrospect. But I agree that 'now' is very weird.
      2016 was weird, too, and it rocked the worlds collective psyche. I'm tempted to suggest that moment in recent history forced the collective consciousness to discover its ability to adapt to the unexpected, and leaves us better equipped to accept and adapt to, and/or rebuild the structure that is absent in this extended moment of human experience

  • @susmitamohapatra9293
    @susmitamohapatra9293 4 роки тому +180

    I see you're a fan of kurzgezagt as well 😃

    • @Nevermind2010
      @Nevermind2010 4 роки тому +6

      He is wearing a kurzgesagt t shirt

    • @Helwdrokin
      @Helwdrokin 4 роки тому +4

      is the fist thing i noticied XD

    • @Helwdrokin
      @Helwdrokin 4 роки тому +3

      there a ting i nerver white corectly

    • @monikalala3810
      @monikalala3810 4 роки тому +1

      Where did he get the T-shirt from? Kurz gesagt, or somewhere else?

    • @abhijitborah
      @abhijitborah 4 роки тому +3

      Birds of a feather

  • @AndrewDotsonvideos
    @AndrewDotsonvideos 4 роки тому +123

    Awesome explanation on the local phase invariance. very nice/10

    • @Boog1137
      @Boog1137 3 роки тому +4

      Ah the cultured one himself

    • @zucc4764
      @zucc4764 3 роки тому

      nice

  • @drewkelly1955
    @drewkelly1955 4 роки тому +293

    Anyone else lost af? I’d honestly appreciate a more in-depth lecture on this

    • @polychoron
      @polychoron 4 роки тому +48

      I'm lost beyond fuck. But mostly because I can't math. All those greek symbols are just scrambled eggs. It's still very interesting, the parts I understood.

    • @davidhand9721
      @davidhand9721 4 роки тому +7

      Watch PBS Space Time episodes on Noether's theorem. Also, same show has a good episode on this topic, called, um, quantum invariance something something... you'll see it. Much more in depth.

    • @TheJohnblyth
      @TheJohnblyth 4 роки тому +3

      I think it’s becoming expected because of the format that you can slow down, pause or repeat anything that is bothersome. UA-cam can let you experience it all at half the speed if you like :) I’m going to have to do that with some of the earlier videos to get a better grasp of what was presented here.

    • @martifingers
      @martifingers 4 роки тому +5

      Yes, I am very lost I am afraid.

    • @pronounjow
      @pronounjow 4 роки тому +1

      He said this is Part 1 out of 4.

  • @rzezzy1
    @rzezzy1 4 роки тому +46

    8:44 finally a counterpart to PBS Spacetime's "actually, quantum mechanics forbids this"

  • @macronencer
    @macronencer 4 роки тому +54

    Yeah... this one's going to need several viewings! There has to be at least an hour's worth of material covered in under ten minutes. Still, I'm sure it's almost impossible to simplify this topic. Thank you for continuing to treat your audience as intelligent, rather than dumbing down for cheap view counts. Really appreciate that!

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  4 роки тому +24

      Yeah, this is a problem we all run into with quantum mechanics. If you remove the math from QM, there's barely anything left to talk about. That's basically all QM is.

    • @spacejunky4380
      @spacejunky4380 3 роки тому +6

      @@ScienceAsylum breaking down the math into intuition is hard to do. I follow the formulas when you explain what they are doing. When they are applied to the EMF I become lost trying to find the connections between the formula's parts and what is going on inside of the model of the field. I probably have to rewatch it to understand it better. When I really follow what's going on, I can see why you're mind is blown because I definitely have those moments too. Thank you for sharing your knowledge, I appreciate your videos.

  • @Ivan___Cunha
    @Ivan___Cunha 4 роки тому +28

    Great video
    To be pedantically precise, Noether's theorem says that every continuous symmetry is linked to the conservation of some charge, but not all conserved charges are due to symmetry. Some charges have topological nature (if there were magnetic monopoles, their charge would be topological and not a Noether's charge).

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  4 роки тому +17

      Thanks for the pedantic correction. You're not the first to mention this. I just pinned a comment clarifying.

    • @yashagnihotri6901
      @yashagnihotri6901 4 роки тому +3

      As much my knowledge knowledge is concerned , magnetic monopoles don't exist ! Just for the sake of keeping the divergence of magnetic field Zero .

    • @michaeldamolsen
      @michaeldamolsen 4 роки тому +4

      If you really want to be pedantic, I suppose you should say "differentiable symmetry" rather than "continuous symmetry" :)

    • @Ivan___Cunha
      @Ivan___Cunha 4 роки тому +6

      ​@@michaeldamolsen That's a second order pedantic correction XD

    • @Ivan___Cunha
      @Ivan___Cunha 4 роки тому +1

      @@yashagnihotri6901, As far we know there are no fundamental particle with topological charge (like the magnetic monopole), but condensed matter have plenty of topological deffects with topological charges.

  • @akashdeeppaul9272
    @akashdeeppaul9272 4 роки тому +108

    *Watches the video lying on the couch and snacking popcorn*
    Nick : I don't know if you know this but humans are lazy.

    • @mldag1678
      @mldag1678 3 роки тому

      Same, I'm also SO tired so I didn't get all of it (I'll probably watch this again) but I still understood a lot of things, Nick is amazing

  • @vincelaszloszalma2103
    @vincelaszloszalma2103 4 роки тому +26

    It was an astonishingly efficient way of breaking down the fundamentals of a very complex subject. The usage of
    analogies is truly enlightening, not to mention that the structure of categorization you implement is perfectly consistent. I cannot express the value of your work properly. Thank you, sir!

  • @guilhermesantosmacedo1694
    @guilhermesantosmacedo1694 4 роки тому +35

    4:06 Oh, that's why we call magnetic potential with "A" then...

  • @Lucky10279
    @Lucky10279 4 роки тому +9

    “We might not know what they are, but their behavior is described by waves of probability.”
    Exactly! I wish people would stop saying that electrons _are_ waves when the reality is that we don’t know _what_ they are. We do know how they _behave_ though, and that’s far more important.

    • @josephlombardo1246
      @josephlombardo1246 4 роки тому +1

      idk electrons are electrons, and we use the mathematics of waves to describe their behavior. there is no need to figure out "what they are," only what their properties are. there is a sense in which it's not really meaningful to talk about "what they are" beyond excitations in a quantum field. At some level you reach brute facts, and you can only describe things in terms of their properties as mathematical objects but that's just the universe for ya.

    • @Lucky10279
      @Lucky10279 4 роки тому +1

      @@josephlombardo1246 Yes, that's what I was saying. We don't _know_ what they are, but we do know how they _behave_ and that behavior is dictated by their properties. That knowledge is far more valuable.

    • @da_birdman6800
      @da_birdman6800 4 роки тому +1

      All particles are vibrations in a quantum fabric. This fabric is a 3d+1 hyperfluid "something" The theories that describe this are called Quantum Field Theories. Particles have no actual distinct dimensions. They are not balls or any solid thing. Their physical trajectories are fuzzy and that creates probabilistic shapes that vary but the corpuscular view of elementary particles is just an illusion.

    • @Lucky10279
      @Lucky10279 4 роки тому

      I can't believe I posted this only a month ago! Over the past couple weeks I've become convinced that electrons almost certainly _are_ actual physical waves in quantum fields. That's so ironic! I don't know that I've ever changed my mind about something so completely in such a short time (at least not something I've spent so much time thinking about.)

    • @da_birdman6800
      @da_birdman6800 4 роки тому

      I had a hard time understand physics from solid objective prospective as a teen learning about science. My biggest issue is that each time you say a particle has an exact size and shape that begs the question. Well then what defines that object? More particles? At some point things must be vibrations or motions of some medium or fabric.

  • @FGj-xj7rd
    @FGj-xj7rd 4 роки тому +38

    That's actually a pretty funny thumbnail. It definitely fits with the character.

    • @FGj-xj7rd
      @FGj-xj7rd 4 роки тому +5

      Ayyy, thanks for the heart. This heart is also invariant 😅

    • @hoodedR
      @hoodedR 4 роки тому +4

      @@FGj-xj7rd so what is conserved

    • @FGj-xj7rd
      @FGj-xj7rd 4 роки тому +2

      @@hoodedR 🥴

    • @Darkanight
      @Darkanight 4 роки тому +3

      it's the first time I see "definitely" being spelled correctly on youtube this month. congratz. lol

    • @Zeegoku1007
      @Zeegoku1007 4 роки тому +1

      @@Darkanight
      Lol. How ? At least for mobile users spell correction kicks in. 😂

  • @mtslybot78
    @mtslybot78 4 роки тому +10

    There's a lot to absorb in this video. Concepts explained clearly infer a deeper intuition that I'm honestly struggling to process without having to pause the video. I think this will prove to be a video that is worth returning to multiple times as you incorporate all the nuance from continued study with the goal of deeper, but also more intuitive understanding. Good job!

  • @nadiyayasmeen3928
    @nadiyayasmeen3928 4 роки тому +56

    I see Kuzgesagt T-SHIRT

  • @dixshants1227
    @dixshants1227 4 роки тому +26

    I have been here since you were at 10k subs and even commented that you are one of the most underrated science channels. This video again just proves my point and I will see u again once u hit a million😉

  • @MaryAnnNytowl
    @MaryAnnNytowl 2 роки тому +4

    I think the cardboard look for some of those drawings is absolutely darling!
    Now, this video will need a couple of viewings to let it soak in, but with the rest of the explanations of electricity & how it works, it really helps, because it goes to the subject from a bit of a different perspective. Thanks so much for that!

  • @pleaseenteraname4824
    @pleaseenteraname4824 4 роки тому +45

    Anything: **is conserved**
    Emmy: "I have been called"

    • @Zeegoku1007
      @Zeegoku1007 4 роки тому +3

      The woman I respect the most 😤🤘

    • @timbeaton5045
      @timbeaton5045 4 роки тому

      @@Zeegoku1007 well, it IS nice that her work has become better known over recent times. Groundbreaking stuff at the time, and underpins much of physics that we now study.

  • @adityachk2002
    @adityachk2002 4 роки тому +302

    Your target audience is even Smaller than vsauce, kurzegat vertasiums physics girl and others.... because you literally talk actual equations

    • @manitro337
      @manitro337 4 роки тому +10

      Alas, this is the reality of true education; boring as hell.

    • @chesterdomingo4590
      @chesterdomingo4590 4 роки тому +49

      I acctually appreciate the presentation of actual equations.

    • @mydearfriend007
      @mydearfriend007 4 роки тому +47

      @@manitro337 it's not boring at all

    • @ronanstephens1597
      @ronanstephens1597 4 роки тому +47

      PBS Spacetime is where I go to learn new things about physics. Science Asylum is where I go to learn that I have to relearn what I thought I knew about physics.

    • @paulthompson9668
      @paulthompson9668 4 роки тому +8

      Adityachk2002 He found the sweet spot between Brian Greene and Leonard Susskind.

  • @DANGJOS
    @DANGJOS 2 роки тому +8

    Definitely your most complicated video, but also fascinating. Thanks! And I remember that dreaded A vector from Electrodynamics. Makes me want to revisit it and give myself a better understanding.

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  2 роки тому +1

      Yeah, it's definitely a "core audience only" kind of video 😆

  • @alexsmit5430
    @alexsmit5430 4 роки тому +5

    This is a great application of Noether’s theorem. I learned this in my upper division physics this semester so this was cool to see.

  • @danielwalker5682
    @danielwalker5682 4 роки тому +10

    Awe inspiring. Can't say I understood more than ~25%, but hey....I always felt there must be something that would pin down the "arbitary" extra functions on the electric scalar and magnetic vector potentials. I suppose quantum mechanics would have to come in somewhere....Keep up the great work.

  • @ShubhamRaj-mu8ol
    @ShubhamRaj-mu8ol 4 роки тому +7

    Who liked that he is wearing a kurzgesagt t shirt and used Vsauce's "Or is it?" at 5:05.

  • @ailblentyn
    @ailblentyn 4 роки тому +9

    This will take a few views! What an interesting topic.

  • @Mr41297
    @Mr41297 4 роки тому +10

    Thanks for making that 'quantum mechanics requires this' meme so I didn't have to

  • @toknowledge1371
    @toknowledge1371 3 роки тому +2

    It's inextricably good to understand for those like me who always trying to grasp Quantum Theory from it's root.
    Thanks for this magnificent contribution of Explanation.

  • @pratyushbhattarai5632
    @pratyushbhattarai5632 4 роки тому +16

    Not the first
    Not the last
    But when I see Nick upload
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    I click fast fast!!

  • @larryseabrook7089
    @larryseabrook7089 2 роки тому +2

    Great job covering so many key concepts in such a short period of time.

  • @DeclanMBrennan
    @DeclanMBrennan 4 роки тому +5

    That's a fantastic explanation of phase invariance. You covered a lot of ground in a single decaminute but I found it very electromagnetically illuminating. After the little teaser, I'm hoping for a video or two on relativistic QM - a fun challenge. :-) Thanks for all the energy you put into these videos. It's time well spent.

  • @ocnus1.61
    @ocnus1.61 4 роки тому +1

    The quality of information and clarity despite being dificult topics (if one wants to truly understand them) is a great benefit to the youth. Thank you.

  • @reinaldo3091
    @reinaldo3091 4 роки тому +15

    5:00 Vsauce reference?

  • @reubenrk3406
    @reubenrk3406 4 роки тому +2

    I wish all teachers were like you.

  • @Private_Duck
    @Private_Duck 4 роки тому +26

    No dislikes yet!!
    Edit:- This is the only video that made me scratch my head...

    • @rauldumitrascu4929
      @rauldumitrascu4929 4 роки тому +2

      I agree. Straight to rewatching list. 😁

    • @afobear
      @afobear 4 роки тому

      Agreed. That was a lot of equation manipulation on the go.

    • @nadavdanieli
      @nadavdanieli 4 роки тому +3

      Yup, didn't understand a thing.

    • @timo4258
      @timo4258 4 роки тому +1

      I think nobody understands why quantum mechanics rules are like they are. Hopefully one day we understand the underlying causes for all this.

  • @admiralhyperspace0015
    @admiralhyperspace0015 4 роки тому +1

    I loved the video but you just show the symbols. Show a little more of the maths. Like just putting the gauge function in and show that it doesn't do squat to the original function. And give things some more mathematical sense. We really can't appreciate these topics without the maths. But its great that you are actually covering such an important topic that others just take as a given or shrink at the requirement of explaining. I am your fan. You bring me real value and cover the best, most useful and complicated topics. Thank You.

  • @xyz.ijk.
    @xyz.ijk. 4 роки тому +3

    Outstanding video!!! Seriously clear and complete and among your best.

  • @AndreZoiaum
    @AndreZoiaum 2 роки тому +1

    You are one of the best teachers I ever saw, took me just 2 views to get something I didn't even study in chemistry

  • @edjanygo
    @edjanygo 4 роки тому +3

    Hi Nick, I m quite impressed by this video. I ve never come accross any vulgarization articles or videos about charge, phase invariance and EM gauge. This topic is thought to be too complex or mathematical to be explained. Many thanks for the effort of busting the white lies and dubious analogies we are told to simplify our understanding of physics. As a contrary I think the difficulties, the counter intuitive concepts and fine descriptions are the heart of seeing physics as logical system.

  • @da_birdman6800
    @da_birdman6800 4 роки тому

    Nice way to precisely explain the fact that the charges of particles are really about relationships between the rotational motion of said particle & the overall motion of the local fields created by the particles.

  • @FundamentallyExplained
    @FundamentallyExplained 4 роки тому +3

    Wow that’s a lot of mathematics covered in such a short time :O in my own videos I always end up abstracting the mathematics away a bit more for the sake of clarity, but it is honestly inspiring to see it not done like that, while still yielding a thorough and clear explanation! Awesome :D!

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  4 роки тому +5

      I don't normally have this much math in my videos. I've just been sitting on this video for a year now, tweaking it a little bit at a time and never being happy with it, so it was time to let it go. I needed to be done with it.

    • @FundamentallyExplained
      @FundamentallyExplained 4 роки тому +3

      The Science Asylum I hope you are nonetheless happy with how the video ended up! Not sure if it helps, but I think it is impressive to see gauge invariance, Noether’s theorem and the physical implications compressed into 10 minutes. That’s everything but easy, especially while making the explanation as understandable as possible, but I think this video does a great job at that :-)

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  4 роки тому +2

      I'm as happy as I was ever going to be with it I think. I don't think there was any way to make this an A+ topic. It's just too niche.

  • @voldoreabhi
    @voldoreabhi 4 роки тому +1

    I am a fan of science, you have the best way to engage even the non science people

  • @Pedritox0953
    @Pedritox0953 4 роки тому +5

    2:20 "... my stress goes with quarantine invariance..." xD Great joke!!

  • @arielshikoba1857
    @arielshikoba1857 2 роки тому

    👽The State of the 5th DImension is "Action & Cause" AKA "Effect & Affect" of the Probability of Matter (5th Dimension Light 5th DImensional Matter). And this video explains it! Bravo! 💜

  • @cherubin7th
    @cherubin7th 4 роки тому +3

    3:35 I never noticed this before!

  • @EarlWallaceNYC
    @EarlWallaceNYC 3 роки тому +1

    Mathematically deep video. Challenging,, but worth it. I'm subscribing because of this video.

  • @James42_
    @James42_ 4 роки тому +4

    Dang it! Why did you upload this hour?! Now I can’t sleep and late for school Tomorrow lol

  • @mikstern5471
    @mikstern5471 4 роки тому +2

    Your videos are great! I would love to see one covering the topic of why spin half particles follow Fermi statistics, and integer spin particles follow the Bose-Einstein statistics. Thanks in advance.

  • @benjaminbrady2385
    @benjaminbrady2385 4 роки тому +3

    5:00 Hey, Vsauce. Michael here

  • @l0_0l45
    @l0_0l45 4 роки тому +2

    Hell I learnt so much new stuff in this video! Please make more deep fundamental stuff like this!

  • @adityasonawane686
    @adityasonawane686 4 роки тому +3

    It's mid night and is saw your video and was like ...
    Let the morning online class go to hell ....
    Let's watch the video 😎😎 .

  • @johnrowson2253
    @johnrowson2253 4 місяці тому +1

    Thanks for showing the equation

  • @FedericoGalatolo
    @FedericoGalatolo 4 роки тому +3

    Damn, how I would love to have a deep understanding of this 😅

  • @TomHendricksMusea
    @TomHendricksMusea 4 роки тому +1

    Fine video as always - but I have two simple questions about charge that I cannot find an answer to.
    1. Why is the attraction from positive to negative, and never the other way around?
    2. Why is the positive charge in the nucleus and the negative charge outside? Why isn't it the other way around?

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  4 роки тому +2

      1. If you ask "why" enough times, the answer will eventually be "because it is." That's where you are with this question.
      2. It could just as easily have been the other way around. It just so happens that the more massive particles are positive (so they move less). In antimatter atoms, the negative charges are more massive so those are the ones in the nucleus.

    • @TomHendricksMusea
      @TomHendricksMusea 4 роки тому

      The Science Asylum that's an interesting point that I did not know.

  • @melonhuskx15
    @melonhuskx15 4 роки тому +3

    *Tesla would be proud for that thumbnail*

  • @sillypoint2292
    @sillypoint2292 4 роки тому +2

    Hey Nick!
    Iam really a big fan of you.
    I love your videos a lot.
    I always wanted a teacher like you.
    And the way of expressing the ideas is really awesome.
    I always wished to see you hit 1M and grow like veritasium and physics girl .
    So keep hope Nick . I'll see the day when u hit 1M very soon.

  • @skylorwilliams5036
    @skylorwilliams5036 4 роки тому +12

    “Hopefully that ties up all the loose ends.” 😂

    • @bigbadt392
      @bigbadt392 4 роки тому

      That tells u a call of duty fan n u used gen. Shepherd's dialogue

  • @christopheryang6416
    @christopheryang6416 4 роки тому +1

    I am happy to learn modern physics from your video.

  • @elgabacho73
    @elgabacho73 4 роки тому +30

    I feel smarter and dumber after watching these videos. :)

  • @itaybenguigui8788
    @itaybenguigui8788 4 роки тому +1

    You are the best Thank you ! Few months ago I saw Your video on The principal of least action and it got me so interested at your channel!

  • @areallymessedupdude
    @areallymessedupdude 4 роки тому +3

    I think you are an 👽 alien send to help us grow. That explains the clones 👻

  • @nikolaykaloferov2894
    @nikolaykaloferov2894 4 роки тому +2

    So complicated and also so simple(in some ways).I mean it's good to know what's around us and how it's work. Keep going ☺

  • @CaioEduardoG.
    @CaioEduardoG. 4 роки тому +3

    Almost first... Yeah
    Edit: Science, Mr White

  • @808bigisland
    @808bigisland 6 місяців тому +1

    Excellent! Charisma and intellect and a good sense of humor

  • @ryancrawford4130
    @ryancrawford4130 4 роки тому +2

    Would it be possible to get videos about coupling and symmetries of the strong and weak interactions?

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  4 роки тому +1

      This will happen eventually, yes. It's just a little more complicated than electric charge. Need to do more research first.

  • @adrient3957
    @adrient3957 2 роки тому +1

    This video made a lot of sense about notions I didn't fully understood 10 years ago, back in grad school. Thanks.

  • @EnginAtik
    @EnginAtik 4 роки тому +1

    This video is packed with information and funny as heck. I am sure I will come back to this video many times.

  • @c.vdheide
    @c.vdheide 4 роки тому +1

    Absolutely TRUE!!!!!!!!!!!!! In so many senses of the way! Brilliantly done! Brilliantly seen! Totally clear!

  • @zakirhussain-js9ku
    @zakirhussain-js9ku 2 роки тому

    Like mass, electric and magnetic charge are are independent entities. The 3 join in specific ratio to make particles.

  • @eduardoGentile720
    @eduardoGentile720 4 роки тому +2

    I've been searching for a video like this for a ton, nobody else on internet has talked about it, not even matt'o'dowd

    • @timh.6872
      @timh.6872 4 роки тому +1

      Sapcetime did actually cover this, it just took a few videos to go over it. I think they have a playlist on QED

    • @eduardoGentile720
      @eduardoGentile720 4 роки тому +1

      @@timh.6872 Really, well...sorry my bad, guess i wasn't good enough with my research...still happy that nick did something

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  4 роки тому

      This video was supposed to happen a whole year ago, but I decided it wasn't ready then.

  • @igehring
    @igehring 2 роки тому

    Here I go again, just a regular person , watch again to TRY to memorize terms and concepts, to start forming tiny ideas that combined with more memorizations and clarifications will result in the beginning of understanding what this video is about. Wish me perseverance

  • @xXYourShadowDaniXx
    @xXYourShadowDaniXx 3 роки тому +1

    What another comment said should have been the end summary, in layman's terms this means the charge of a particle cannot change therefore the particles with charge are changing the field.

  • @altuber99_athlete
    @altuber99_athlete 4 роки тому +2

    1:13 Once you corrected me with that hehe. Thanks.
    3:37 It'd be great to watch a video on potentials, that was one of the most abstract ideas in electromagnetic theory courses.

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  4 роки тому

      I don't know how to make potentials interesting by themselves. This was my best attempt. I tried talking about why they're important. Abstract mathematics isn't really what I do on this channel.

    • @altuber99_athlete
      @altuber99_athlete 4 роки тому

      @@ScienceAsylum Hi Nick! What about a video on voltage? I think you don't have a video on that. Perhaps it will require to talk about electric potentials. 🤔

  • @DeepakChauhan-lc7xe
    @DeepakChauhan-lc7xe 4 роки тому +2

    Nice explanation bro👍

  • @rguimatorres
    @rguimatorres 3 роки тому +1

    Difficult to follow, but you’re excellent explaining! Thank you, Nick! Best regards from Brazil.

  • @AmandaKaymusic
    @AmandaKaymusic 4 роки тому

    Guitar pedals circuitry and why speakers have a phase switch is a good reason to try and grasp a basic understanding of this interesting topic. Thank you for the clarity and humour that can make these great clips easier to watch more than once. Who programs the backing music?

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  4 роки тому

      Aside from my three-second intro song (which I made), the rest of the music is from the UA-cam music library (because I know I won't get a copyright strike over it).

  • @kylorenkardashian79
    @kylorenkardashian79 3 роки тому +2

    You're amazing Doc

  • @foxhound1008
    @foxhound1008 4 роки тому +1

    I have always thought, that one of the fascinating things about our universe, is that different observers will disagree about “components” of a system, but all observers will agree on the results. For instance, different observers will disagree about the total momentum of a system, but when forces are applied, all observers will agree on the results. So, while total momentum is not reference frame invariant, all observers will agree on the changes.
    Total energy is also not reference frame invariant. Different observers will also disagree on the changes is energy, but all observers will agree on the results.

  • @bend.manevitz8261
    @bend.manevitz8261 Рік тому

    I adore your channel, and *usually* I can follow. Not always 100%, not always first time through, but I can get it.
    This video, however... You need to make like four or ten videos unpacking each little bit. Please.

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  Рік тому +1

      I agree. This needed an entire series. It's too compressed.

  • @icantthinkofacoolname
    @icantthinkofacoolname 2 роки тому

    @5:17 you say something really interesting about how we don't know exactly what particles are, but we know they aren't spheres. I would love to see you make a video that explores what theories there are for physical properties of particles.
    Love your channel!

  • @LuisAldamiz
    @LuisAldamiz 4 роки тому +1

    I watched it twice, maybe even thrice with so many segments I had to rewatch again and again (my mind tends to wander a lot), and I'm still sure I do not understand everything. But that's probably because you compressed a whole course on fundamental physics in a 10 mins. video. There's a lot of info on the fundaments of Reality in this short video: it's thus extremely hard for any non-specialized human being. I'll rewatch a few more times probably: it's extremely good: a very dense pack of knowledge. TY.

    • @yashagnihotri6901
      @yashagnihotri6901 4 роки тому

      Yeah , being in 12th grade right now , obstructs my limited knowledge to understand the concept of 'Gauge' included in the video rest all was a bit easier to grasp. Probably today I will read about it (Guage or whatever it is )

  • @lekhnathghimire
    @lekhnathghimire 4 роки тому +1

    2:26 best part

  • @e7ebr0w
    @e7ebr0w 2 роки тому

    can't say I understand anything any better, but you did a great job

  • @mandisaplaylist
    @mandisaplaylist 2 роки тому

    1:43 More specifically, it is a number that stays the same throughout every possible interaction between the things involved.

  • @mrl9418
    @mrl9418 4 роки тому +2

    At 8:03, assuming particle interaction with the em field is described by the Schrodinger-Pauli equation, how do you prove those things are equivalent? I can see how you can derive phase invariance from the form of the S-P equation, but can you go the other way around and deduce S-P from local phase invariance (and maybe say the basic Schrodinger equation) ?

    • @mrl9418
      @mrl9418 4 роки тому +1

      In other words, local phase invariance alone corrects the Schrodinger equation into the Schrodinger-Pauli equation ? And what's a book that tackles the maths of that ?

  • @stefanopastore8886
    @stefanopastore8886 4 роки тому +1

    man this is one of the best videos you have ever made

  • @borg972
    @borg972 2 роки тому

    I love all the videos on this channel but this one is the most obscure and hard to understand so @The Science Asylum if you ever consider a revisit or expand to one of your videos please choose this one! 😺

  • @MrBananabomber123
    @MrBananabomber123 4 роки тому +1

    I always love your quantum mechanics videos.

  • @3pizza43
    @3pizza43 4 роки тому +1

    I only understood like 20% of this video but it makes me really excited for my first year in college next year as a physics major (hopefully it won’t be online)

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  4 роки тому

      I hope it’s in-person too! Good luck!

  • @parshvpatel9644
    @parshvpatel9644 3 роки тому +1

    never seen
    this deep version on charges and EM interaction

  • @lucasfreitag9794
    @lucasfreitag9794 4 роки тому +1

    I can't express how nice this video is. Well done

  • @squatchymcsquatchsquatch3015
    @squatchymcsquatchsquatch3015 4 роки тому +1

    That first "FUCK YEAH THERE IS" made a little bit of my drink spray out my nose! I just wasn't ready for it and didn't suspect it. I mean, I don't think it was objectively S-tier funny, but there was just something perfectly timed and placed about it. Always love seeing a new vid from you in the notifications. Great video sir.

  • @wisdomarea6665
    @wisdomarea6665 2 роки тому +1

    Everything gone over head...but enjoyed watching 😂😂😂

  • @RoXon007
    @RoXon007 4 роки тому +1

    I appreciate your hard work for explaining deeply.😊

  • @JavierArveloCruzSantana
    @JavierArveloCruzSantana 4 роки тому +1

    I will watch this a few more times. Thank you.

  • @eoingriffin3517
    @eoingriffin3517 Рік тому +1

    Excllent explanation of guage invariance

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  Рік тому +1

      Thanks! This video was difficult to write.

    • @eoingriffin3517
      @eoingriffin3517 Рік тому +1

      @@ScienceAsylum yeah I bet it was, I will use that explanation and your video in future physics classes

  • @pranatsharma4687
    @pranatsharma4687 4 роки тому

    You could have used QFT, and used nother's theorem for the quantized dirac field, to get conserved quantities like spin and charge based which index of QM stress energy tensor is 0. This would also be a great explanation for relativistic particles too.

  • @Carlos-fl6sv
    @Carlos-fl6sv 4 роки тому +1

    can you talk about stephen wolfram theory of everything?

  • @Mowxel
    @Mowxel 4 роки тому +1

    I havent watched you since you had like 3k subs im glad youre doing great and only on the rise.

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  4 роки тому +1

      Where have you been? 🤔 I hope everything is ok and it's just that UA-cam hasn't been showing you my videos.

  • @kpw84u2
    @kpw84u2 Рік тому +1

    Laughed heartily at the quarantine crack!!! 🤣😂🤣