In the US, only the hourly wages workers get OT paid. For example, the IT and other professional in the bay area are salary paid with bonus and other stock options. It sounds funny when I heard professional in Google making US$ 500k is willing to work longer hours like a McDonalds worker because the OT paid is tax free.
I’ve been a fan of Dr Chiu for some years now. But when it comes to the issues in the US, he doesn’t get it quite right. A lot of the info and his opinions around US are one sided and without deeper context. I know a big portion of Chinese/Asians who live and have studied in the US would usually only stay in their own world and still don’t understand the culture well. I’ve lived in the US for 12 years now and my wife is Caucasian American. I’ve lived in blue state and now in a very red state. Generally speaking, things are not as extreme as people outside tend to think and there are a lot of misinformation in the Chinese media sources.
When someone disagree with others, pointing out specifically in what issues don’t agree with is important. What Dr. Chui have said at least he came with data and examples.
主要原因是遷移問題。問題是那些非法越境的外國人，但由於拜登允許在美國境內申請政治庇護，他們被允許合法進入美國，並為這些人提供了住房、食品、醫療福利和每月津貼，直到美國當地政府批准為止。可憐的美國拉丁裔和黑人甚至無法在晚上外出，他們的公園被改造成營地。所有這些都將少數人推向川普，因為這已經足夠了，因為這影響了他們的日常生活。 最後的想法，當我問民主黨人時，他們從未批准非法外國人帶著他們沒有的全部利益來到美國，而且他們不同意這些 庇護城市。感謝您的影片。 The major reason is migrate issue. The issues are those illegal alien cross border but because of Biden allow Political Asylum apply Inside USA, they are allow to enter USA legally and those people were provided with Housing, Food, medical benefit and monthly allowance to spend during time until approval which USA's local homeless don't even have those benefit/privilege. The Poor local/US Latino and Black cannot even go out at night and their parks were converted to Camp. All these push the minority toward Trump because enough is enough because it impact their daily life. Final thought, when I ask the democratic, they never approval the illegal alien came to USA with FULL benefit which they did not have and they do not agree on those sanctuary cities. Thanks for the video.
The explanation for the sudden increase in votes for Biden in 2020 is just that-an explanation, not proof. If you've watched financial entertainment channels like CNBC for long enough, you’ll recognize that these explanations are often just stories told after the fact, lacking solid evidence. Unless someone can come up with a way to compare the likelihood using concrete data, I remain skeptical of any such explanations. Surprisingly, this is actually doable, but I don’t see anyone on either side addressing it. If it were up to me, I’d start by asking these questions: 1) Are the mailed-in votes counted by the same machines that aggregate the in-person votes? - 1a) If yes, why aren’t there any small amounts of Trump votes mixed in? - 1b) If no, when the aggregated votes are input into the system, was there a chance for errors? In general, the U.S. voting systems are a mess. I can’t track my vote, and I have no way of confirming whether it was counted as I intended. But I’m not surprised. When you compare the USPS tracking system to UPS, it’s clear how well the government manages a business. If I can track my packages online, I don’t see why I shouldn’t be able to track my vote from start to finish. If the cost of voting was $10, I’d be happy to pay $100 to ensure that the 9 people who can’t afford it are able to vote for free.
Here is CA, I can track my vote, and even get email notification for when the post office collect my vote, when the election office receives my vote, and when my vote is counted.. As for you question, I think most state will count in-person vote and mail in vote separately, for mail in vote would require the process of opening the envelope and verifying signature. I also know you can know how your vote is counted in FL too.
I agree with many of your analyses today. But, you are using a graduate school level of analysis to interpret the majority of the Trump voters, people without a college degree. Majority of his voters only sees inflation and their personal economic issues. They don't know Trump's policies will negatively affect their pocket book, but, instead, expecting Trump's policies will be better than Harris' regarding inflation and economy. I am not saying cultural issues do not play a role, but, it's mostly about economy.
well, as someone who would never vote for Trump, or anyone like him, I would say, you gotta hand it to him, for he is capable of getting into those people's feeling, make them felt heard and understood, and convince them his policies will be the change they need. Dems are just suck at it. You don't get vote if you keep telling people the economy isn't that bad while they feel otherwise.
《趙氏讀書生活》，一個歷史學者的平台，分享學術、社會、政治經濟觀察，請以每月5元美元獲取收費平台Patreon的參考資料、獨家專欄、史學和哲學短講分享：
www.patreon.com/Chiusreading
或於UA-cam 上按加入成為會員，可獲影片的參考資料
ua-cam.com/channels/mi1257Mo7v4ors9-ekOq1w.htmljoin
網傳的所谓的0元購就是美國加利福尼亞州由民選通過的一個法案。第47号提案（Proposition 47）把偷盜由重罪改成輕罪。既然是由人民投票通過的法案，又怎麼可能會因為這個法案反對民主黨呢。趙氏真的被謠言影響不少。需要自己親自去了解啊。當然，這次選舉還是哈里斯拿了加利福尼亞州的54張選舉人票。如果真的跟0元購有關聯的，估計第一個選特朗普的就是加利福尼亞州。而且，這個法案不是全美通過，只是一洲的法案。我真的聽你講聽到一頭霧水。
@@ChenTanTan-lp3bt- 真正了解 美帝政經的聽眾 就知主持人 越講越露底, 一知半解, 識少少 扮代表,, 咁樣吹！
趙博好同意, 近年所有嘢尤其係美國, 好多人、 事都好荒謬, 顛覆咗童年同道德觀🤦🏻♀️🤦🏻♀️
可惜零元購下既加州仍係民主黨票倉
趙生所言甚是,我有幾個朋友皆是不怎麼理會國際事(以巴,俄烏等),和有點小錢(不太怕通帳),但 lgbtq 和小費文化則讓他們生活感受到徹底影響和麻煩, 第二,則賀錦麗説話太空泛不像Trump有力.至少賀錦麗上台後想做甚麼是不知道的
零元購及極左思維因素，我和新澤西州華人親戚朋友全投Trump。
醒覺文化非常值得思考！
🙏🏾True facts 💯 awakening 🙏🏾
西方國家已經過左思考嘅地步.
我覺得係因為夏里斯沒有在經濟議題上多加功夫造成給特朗普獲勝，中間選民還是多看多方面，進步主義等政治正確的都並非主要不滿成因。
民主黨票數 2016: 6千5百萬，2020: 8千1百萬，2024: 6千8百萬； 共和黨2016: 6千2百萬，2020: 7千4百萬，2024: 7千2百萬； 所以民主黨2024只是回到正常票數，而且2020的民調跟2024根本沒大分別，所以你所說的各種理由都不足以解釋相差的1千萬票，民調為什麼沒反映少了10幾%的人投民主黨
好多共和黨選民在接受民調時，拒答或扮成中間選民，致特朗普在民調中被低估。😅
@@ylChan-h5i 試試這樣看，2020年，民主黨民調48%：得票8千1百萬，共和黨民調46%：得票7千4百萬；2024年， 民主黨48%：6千8百萬，共和黨46%：7千2百萬，民調沒變，共和黨得票沒變，唯獨民主黨得票少了10幾%，解釋不了
民調算個屁，賭局里才是真正的民意。
@@jerryslchiu 民調=/=投票率, 你可以支持某個候選人, 但唔去投票. 而且, 民調大多數都係+/-3%, 即係最多可以搖擺6%, 而明顯民調低估咗2~3%左右, 呢啲好多係唔接受電話, 我見到估計得最接近既既民調公司有直頭去game入面做民調, 用in-game currency做回報. 所以10%好正常. 更何況, 2020係特例, 因為人人都可以郵寄投票, 方便咗就會投票率高咗.
2020做票一千几万 选票比登记选民还要多一千万 根本解释唔到
趙先生晚上好，大學晚上好，多謝趙先生分析同分享，多謝！多謝！
Sorry我真係唔覺得中間票係因為極左而轉投Trump。係大部份working class真係覺得經濟唔好，覺得Trump可以appeal to their needs。
趙博士，每次聽完你的講解後!真的長智識😊
贊成趙博，更加贊成Trump
不過變性有一點要商榷。
基於生長激素影響、越成長得男/女性化、對變性人士之後希望成為另一性別、是非常影響其性別外觀。
因此有些個案會讓其在青春期時開始接受激素治療。
這只是單純提供多一點關於變性手術是否需要提高年齡門檻的論據、並非支持或反對變性、謝謝。
多謝你的分析..👍👍👏👏
15:40 急進加息係拜登政府政策？我相信聯儲局作為一個獨立的機構，其決策不受政治干預是常識吧？
趙博，呀Trump 贏主要係有60%Hispanic 選佢，比起上次選舉，其他種族和性別變動唔係好大，至於點解，連Democrat都未知，呢個係一個有趣議題，你有時間可以做探討下。
善軒老師好! 大家好! 早/午/晚上好!
我係極右Libertarian 我認為人人有自由變性安樂死, 前題係行使自由的人有能力承擔後果, 即未成年人士有冇能力承擔後果就係問題所在
2024年民主黨得票嘅數目，與2016及2012相若。祇有2020年特別多千多萬票。這個不能單單從郵寄選票中解釋過去。因為今年回復返正常水平，但一樣有郵寄選票😊
但今屆好多地方唔會好似4年前咁容易攞郵寄選票, 有唔少地方要主動要求,
@@brucel7430 2020的选票比登记选民多的多 点解释
@@norvin3070 "2020的选票比登记选民多的多 点解释" 你既資訊來源係?
極之認同。
通脹數據只係經濟學上統計，特朗普時代高通脹，但是它由低基數起步，及至拜登，已由中基數起步，故人民對實際感覺是較前朝強烈，有記者指四年前來美採訪選舉，吃一碗普通拉麵約五，六美元，至今已跳升至十多美元，而當地市民也埋怨汽油貴，蛋貴，肉貴，租金貴，各式各樣物資年年大幅漲價，故可推論年長及中年選民討厭極左文化，年輕選民則主要關注物價，失業問題，致哈里斯兩原因落敗似乎不相伯仲？🤔
Tech workers like an AI engineer in the US usually get paid with an annual salary and won't get overtime pay.
通常科技業工程師喺美國係年薪，冇加時補水嘅！
咁票有小數又點解釋呢？一無左c-19可以近距離監票就再無小數點出現？
又點解釋一個黨派為咗唔俾一個人參選可以用盡方法去阻止佢？包括告到佢破產告到佢入獄？
成班友扮睇吾到。
單係以色列恐襲後，大批示威遊行支持哈馬斯，還有伊斯蘭教對基督教的排斥，令不少中產高學歷人士驚恐，轉投Trump
美國通漲並不溫和，我在LA 物價從 2020 年至今已超過 40% 但工資漲幅沒那麼高
Support
馬斯克其中一個小朋友走左去變性。所以馬斯克勁憎左膠。
我認為「覺醒文化」和「減稅」，只是美選民揀侵的其中一些原因。
美國經濟從來沒有差過。
但窮人有得益嗎？
宏觀數字係相當好, 但選舉結果顯示大部份選民覺得差.
因為美帝國在全世界收美元鑄幣稅，宜家系Kama ，boomerang 倒噬返美國。
支持
視乎喇，我相信anti woke都係其中一個原因，呢幾日睇電視訪問美國選民，主要都係覺得非法移民問題，同覺得經濟唔好為主
國家經濟無問題。只是老百姓生活開支多了。
赵生分析精准透切，萧生老蒙左，赵生好野
的亂入music好正，同路taste。
減軍費開支經際就會非常好，比起加關稅只是蠅頭小利隨時可能會得不償失！
多謝趙老師從政策分析兩名總統候選人選舉成敗，而唔係簡單賀錦麗廢。
👍👍👍
Trump 當選，美國的經濟會點搞好難講，但大陸一定無運行！
(當年好地地總統大位連任在即，搞左個武肺，Lockdown完全派錢，要全地球埋單，歐美通賑物價番了一番)
(侵侵方仗為人好小氣，佢一定搵主席算賑)
OT 吾使交稅😮😮👍，我希望呢度都係咁。
💪💪💪
唔同意 投票 。 投票本應一次性 因為第一輪結果會影響第二輪和影響第三輪 ， 和開支太大 。事隔3 個月 。
其他同意
谢谢分享，个人认为民主党的候选人临时上阵，并不像奥巴马那样通过各种途径选上，所以民众对她的能力有质疑。
為何不直接承認賀錦麗就系能力匱乏，unqualified 😅
啱聼完一個國內潤到日本噶左派后過嚟听一下趙博中和一下。不過趙博講馬斯克支持特朗普噶原因有啲唔太準確，支持原因主要係歐美左派對特斯拉工廠同SpaceX都造成好大噶阻力，再之加上家庭成員也被左傾毒害，所以馬斯克確實有加入特朗普陣營針對民主黨噶理由。
elon all in trump 只為一樣東西，就是 freedom of speech。
不要只看 legacy media，可以試看看 elon 上的 podcast
你好, 可唔可開一集講保護主意點促使世界大戰？
👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻
連Paul Krugman喺Trump第一屆上任前都預測Trump會令美國陷入經濟衰退，同批評Trump既政策對美國經濟造成災難性影響。但結果佢完全錯晒🤷🏽♂️
蕭山仲成日講Paul Krugman, 所以佢成日燈........
trump盤數得佢自己睇得明 加關稅但減息弱美元💵（靠鑽油就控制通漲） 得唔得架？
管它左右、籃黃、最緊要自己銀包脹，講得好，現實就是這樣😂
絕對贊成趙博士中肯嘅分析, 但係我唔明白你哋點解分唔開難民同非法移民，難民入嚟美國申請庇護, 享受到所有美國人嘅福利. 但係非法移民入到嚟就要自己顧自己, 最多小朋友可以返學, 同埋有emergency入醫院.
讚同趙博對選舉的分析，失敗的最大原因係民主黨已經完成沒有聽到民眾的聲音，離晒地。不過Elon Musk都可能唔係完全為錢，因為錢已經唔能夠滿足佢，權力同影響力先係佢同Trump想要既
In the US, only the hourly wages workers get OT paid. For example, the IT and other professional in the bay area are salary paid with bonus and other stock options. It sounds funny when I heard professional in Google making US$ 500k is willing to work longer hours like a McDonalds worker because the OT paid is tax free.
Not all, it all depends on contract
@@lsman38 Just an example of what Dr. Chiu said the professionals in Bay Area will get tax free OT. It was a funny comment.
趙博幾時講下今屆同上屆嘅票差呀，千鳩幾萬，講解下啦。
Elon係响Trump被槍擊後先出嚟支持Trump架，朱克伯格都係。
這屆川普競選宣言全都是 common sense，例如投票需要 ID， 民主黨勝的州屬全不需 ID
讚成用ID, 但我吾同意Trump輸了吾認而且宣稱做票，我曾經為了了解美國投票的過程而請假做選站職員，事前會在週未接受訓練，有人工但很低工資，在投票日選民可以提供ID或說出自已的姓名、地址，職員會在登記冊上check mark 並給予選票，如果名字已經有check mark表示已經投票不會再給予選票，但會在log book記下資料調查，投票後在門口有張枱是由警察在他的選民名冊簿check mark. 在投票完成後兩本投票名冊會核對投票名字及人數，總投票人數要與當天所用的選票相符。在選舉當天發生什麼特殊事件都票記在log book. 所有選站職員都是要在網上預早登記並訓練，我相信做假不易。
零元購遺害無窮, 受害者其實是所有升斗小民. 被搶的商戶其實損失不大, 因為他們都有保險賠. 保險公司將損失轉嫁給所有需要買保險的客戶. 結果是各類型的保險費都以倍數飈升. 苦了的是每天都要為生活打拼的人們.
畀我都會揀特朗普！刺激經濟用減稅政策我認為係最直接最有效之一，如果而家英國政府識得咁諗就好喇！美國人後知後覺，面對問題勇於改正，欣賞！
如果減有關於個人入息稅，我相信年青人都會頭特朗普，起碼多勞多得！
減稅是捉到選票的最佳靈藥。任何人都不會反對減稅
原來Nothern Ireland，Wales 同Scotland 都唔係用簡單多數制，而係用多輪投票，咁好嘅投票制度點解唔全國推行
即等如你喜歡食蘋果，別人喜歡食橙，也有人鍾愛香蕉，咁無理由要全世界學你齊齊食蘋果才有益㗎？好多選舉制度受傳統及憲法所限，小修還可以，大修似乎不太易？😂
@ylChan-h5i 其實英國係冇所謂明文嘅憲法，要修改只需要提交國會3讀通過，但咁會撼動到好多政治利益而冇政黨夠膽做，但無欵英倫3國嘅投票制度都比英格蘭本土合理得多
Elon还有一个很重要因素是他的一个孩子因为woke病毒死了 情感上他也是必须远离左胶
关于变性根本就不是这一回事，只是说学生可以和老师讲性取向，老师可以选择不向家长报告，根本就不是什么老师带去做手术医保还出钱。这就是谣言，还有加州所谓的0元购也不是不判，而是950一下不判重罪，如果你想加大打击力度又不愿意加税，那不就和你自己批评的工党政策一样既要减少支出又要给工人加福利？小费这个税收政策双方都一样，所以还是谣言的胜利，就像你也不会去查这些消息来源。
你真係完全唔了解美國嘅情況，我朋友在北卡開了幾間餐館請一啲墨西哥人，包食包住平均每人每月人工係美金3000至4000，11am-9pm, 佢哋好多做2、3年就會返去自己老家做一啲小生意，如果冇錢又會再返返嚟（偷渡），所以並不是你所講的1千幾百，當你講呢啲嘢之前最好做咗資料蒐集先無謂誤導人哋
有时觉得赵博是资料搜集不足
God know 😮
左派把發神經改說成進步😅
I’ve been a fan of Dr Chiu for some years now. But when it comes to the issues in the US, he doesn’t get it quite right. A lot of the info and his opinions around US are one sided and without deeper context.
I know a big portion of Chinese/Asians who live and have studied in the US would usually only stay in their own world and still don’t understand the culture well.
I’ve lived in the US for 12 years now and my wife is Caucasian American. I’ve lived in blue state and now in a very red state. Generally speaking, things are not as extreme as people outside tend to think and there are a lot of misinformation in the Chinese media sources.
Agree. Different States different situations. Same as Canada, different Provinces different situations.
When someone disagree with others, pointing out specifically in what issues don’t agree with is important. What Dr. Chui have said at least he came with data and examples.
@@HuaFuYansupport with data, um , not so sure about that
@@ericwithoutsosicyes, a lot of scratching the surface, over labelling, over generalisation, even come up with an awakening theory LoL
"There are a lot of misinformation". The word "misinformation" is an uncountable noun, so the verb should be the singular " is".
最离谱是抢不超过900+美元不算犯罪😅😅😅😅
不算犯罪？你走入店舖不付款拿走90美元的货品看看有什么后果吧！
@@yatsinsun6470你膚色再深啲就沒有問題！
佢唔係北美生活, 好多嘢都係靠估.
@@shirley008 肤色再深啲就无问题？你讲紧派绿帽呀？
@@yatsinsun6470 呢邊係人都知㗎啦
早
👍
美國大選如火茶，，，，，四年又戰是河東，，，，，四年再戰是河西，，，，，鐵金鋼遇温柔鄉，，，，，他半斤遇她八両，，，，，邊境能源華爾街，，，，，姑婆大笑遮口費，，，，，民主共和天註定，，，，，。勝負已分天已知，，。。。
🙋♀️🙋♀️
请趙博参考CNN的選舉日票站出口民调，七成選民認為自己投票基於支持心儀候選人的能力，不是為反對對手而投票，並且绝大部分受訪者承認9月份已決定投什麼人。
我對 progressive 譯為 「進步派」非常反感. 進步有改善良好的意義. Democrats party 在九十年代張自己由liberals 改稱為 progressive 就是要改善自己的形象. 我只會叫他們「前進派」. 他們可能是主張社會前進一步, 但終點可能是萬丈深淵, 未必是「進步」.
特朗普沒有大勝，他的得票（74 mil) 和上屆差別不大，而上次他輸了，某程度上可以說，特朗普基本盤沒有被動搖，但也沒有大量增加新的選票。大選結果反映的是部分支持民主黨的人和中間選民選擇不投票。
Present
🙏❤️🙏👨🏻🎓📚👍🏽👍🏽👏👏
Tips in north america are shared amoung employees
而家經濟唔好，邊個唔想搵多d錢傍身？ 可以賺多d錢交少d稅都會比人支持。
分析得相當好，但我好奇怪亦好有興趣想知道為何當初嘅民調是相當接近，而結果是一面倒，哪裏出錯？
共和黨選民頗多在接受民調時拒訪，或扮作中間選民，致特朗普在民調中被低估。😅
很想听听赵博士的情史 应该很丰富
😮
趙氏分析得不錯好似好有理，但你祗是在英國家內看所謂數據及個人想法作出的看法。事實上美國今天民衆事實手頭上的錢普遍不夠洗，市面普通低迷，很多人做兩份工，才平衡。這在數劇看不到的。加上你這次一個急轉彎。好像今天的你，打倒昨日的你。可能這也是自我修正能力！加油！
十年如一，一向反對民主黨經濟和性別政策，講過N 次，只是一直反侵
主要原因是遷移問題。問題是那些非法越境的外國人，但由於拜登允許在美國境內申請政治庇護，他們被允許合法進入美國，並為這些人提供了住房、食品、醫療福利和每月津貼，直到美國當地政府批准為止。可憐的美國拉丁裔和黑人甚至無法在晚上外出，他們的公園被改造成營地。所有這些都將少數人推向川普，因為這已經足夠了，因為這影響了他們的日常生活。 最後的想法，當我問民主黨人時，他們從未批准非法外國人帶著他們沒有的全部利益來到美國，而且他們不同意這些 庇護城市。感謝您的影片。
The major reason is migrate issue. The issues are those illegal alien cross border but because of Biden allow Political Asylum apply Inside USA, they are allow to enter USA legally and those people were provided with Housing, Food, medical benefit and monthly allowance to spend during time until approval which USA's local homeless don't even have those benefit/privilege. The Poor local/US Latino and Black cannot even go out at night and their parks were converted to Camp. All these push the minority toward Trump because enough is enough because it impact their daily life. Final thought, when I ask the democratic, they never approval the illegal alien came to USA with FULL benefit which they did not have and they do not agree on those
sanctuary cities. Thanks for the video.
馬斯克的機械人觀點是否有點牽強？
馬斯克爆料為何藝人都表態支持賀大媽,接到老闆電話支持川普以後冇工作做.
可能你没有聽Joe Rogan同Elon Musk的節目，佢出黎支持Trump，主要不是移民政策，而係佢16歲囝囝没经佢同意走去變性
條友講嘢白白痴痴咁. 唔掛得之已二年冇聽. 去咗外國見識多咗, 真係知什么叫呃飯食
對於分析為何馬斯克支持特朗普, 我覺得劉細良的分析較合理
趙博令我覺得馬斯克知道在中國大陸賣機械人行不通但在美國可以，又因為拜登對他不公平所以撐特朗普希望爭取市場。
其實我性別認同係世界之王
我有權要全世界歲歲朝貢畀我
The explanation for the sudden increase in votes for Biden in 2020 is just that-an explanation, not proof. If you've watched financial entertainment channels like CNBC for long enough, you’ll recognize that these explanations are often just stories told after the fact, lacking solid evidence. Unless someone can come up with a way to compare the likelihood using concrete data, I remain skeptical of any such explanations.
Surprisingly, this is actually doable, but I don’t see anyone on either side addressing it. If it were up to me, I’d start by asking these questions:
1) Are the mailed-in votes counted by the same machines that aggregate the in-person votes?
- 1a) If yes, why aren’t there any small amounts of Trump votes mixed in?
- 1b) If no, when the aggregated votes are input into the system, was there a chance for errors?
In general, the U.S. voting systems are a mess. I can’t track my vote, and I have no way of confirming whether it was counted as I intended. But I’m not surprised. When you compare the USPS tracking system to UPS, it’s clear how well the government manages a business.
If I can track my packages online, I don’t see why I shouldn’t be able to track my vote from start to finish. If the cost of voting was $10, I’d be happy to pay $100 to ensure that the 9 people who can’t afford it are able to vote for free.
I can track my vote,
Here is CA, I can track my vote, and even get email notification for when the post office collect my vote, when the election office receives my vote, and when my vote is counted.. As for you question, I think most state will count in-person vote and mail in vote separately, for mail in vote would require the process of opening the envelope and verifying signature. I also know you can know how your vote is counted in FL too.
小費免稅呢樣嘢，其實Trump提出但Harris都有支持。但以前睇過研究講過，小費對服務提升嘅影響已經無以前大。因爲美國社會約定俗成係waiter工資低，靠小費生存，而且小費好多時候已經限額minimum，所以佢哋做得好唔好，都一樣收咁多，反而收少佐會同你嘈。
加班費免稅對私企可能有鼓勵，但對早就腐敗不堪嘅政府部門就反作用了，因爲佢哋本身就效率低下仲呃加班費。如果免稅，只會呃得仲狼。
其實上次民主黨勝出，己經征實係多個搖擺州作弊，例如不用ID，郵寄，選票機中出術！😢
唯一抱有希望係俄烏雙方因侵當選而有一個落塲階而停戰. 向大陸甚至全球收関税对美國經濟有乜好處？趕走非法移民上帝都做唔到😂
全世界貿易都揾美帝着數，人家順差，美帝就逆差，長此下去唔係辦法？加關稅，攬炒就攬炒，好過只係單獨自己死？😅
點解啲人經常話侵侵會令美國好起嚟？其實美國係世界最強國，從來都未衰過或者衰極都有限，你估啲窮國咩？講佢會強起來跟本沒邏輯，等個個億萬富翁，你再俾幾億佢又有咩意思？
美國白領OT多數冇保水㗎，而家tips，大家都冇報足。所以特朗普得個講字。你老哥收入一定好高，大部分美國人，包括白領上班族都唔會係減稅政策上得益。
餐廳小費好多都唔上報IRS, 所以要吾要小費徵稅唔會影響太大。而OT唔徵稅主要是俾時薪的人，一般唔係底層的員工都是salaried,对他们是无影响的
現在美國餐廳 多數用credit card 付款 ，一定要報上IRS. 至於小費免徵稅 對於老闆也是一個大喜訊. 底層員工全部是hourly pay. monthly salary/no over pay 是違法，
@ 你提醒左我，cash tips係唔多，好耐無出去吃飯
@@ChristopherCheung-me3kc 問題係靠tips為主要收入既服務業人仕, 大部份收入根本就係唔需要交稅果級, 真係無乜大影響.
@ Mr. Bruce. 美國法律上tips 係當作工資的一部分 part of the income 要繳稅 ，
@@ChristopherCheung-me3kc 要報稅, 但會退稅果種囉. 根據Yale研究, 靠tip揾食既服務業人仕佔美國就業人口既2.5%, 佔收入最低25%人口中既5%. 有D連 standard deduction都未揾到, 再加上有EITC, CTC 呢D tax credit, 佢地基本上係無需交稅.
现在社交网络假消息太可怕了
是「進步」還是鑽牛角尖？
I agree with many of your analyses today. But, you are using a graduate school level of analysis to interpret the majority of the Trump voters, people without a college degree. Majority of his voters only sees inflation and their personal economic issues. They don't know Trump's policies will negatively affect their pocket book, but, instead, expecting Trump's policies will be better than Harris' regarding inflation and economy. I am not saying cultural issues do not play a role, but, it's mostly about economy.
well, as someone who would never vote for Trump, or anyone like him, I would say, you gotta hand it to him, for he is capable of getting into those people's feeling, make them felt heard and understood, and convince them his policies will be the change they need. Dems are just suck at it. You don't get vote if you keep telling people the economy isn't that bad while they feel otherwise.
現今民主黨應該對自己極左政策反思
趟先生😅你之前講過支持民主黨😢點解宜家又轉太😢好似唔係咁好喎😢咁係咪叫😮長頭草😮有D矛盾😂😂
唔通好似你咁，不讲对错只问立场一咪盲撑咩！
一直冇變過，幾年來一直係主張同佢嘅立場
大家聽我講哈利波特、打機文化同迪士尼文化，就知道我立場始終如一
你地誤會, 趙博一路不是支持trump。
@ ？