In your dreams you heard this from a Russian official. And, so, wake up! And look on the Iskander rocket mobile units movement as a response to what you said Sweden and Finland
Why don't you also ask how much of a risk does NATO and the US pose to the rest of the world? Nato and the US have been involved in never ending wars for as long as I can remember
Well said, lot of people now know Ukraine proxy war is not about Ukrainians but rather,to destabilise Russia cause regime change and try to partition Russia. That have woefully failed, the Russian are more united than before. Let the so called west continue to escalate and push Ukraine, those nuclear weapons are not meant animals, and definitely going to be used one day, The world is very closer to that. Russia non strategic nuclear weapons have a yield of between 40 -70 kilotons
Hearing the west continue to trumpet the fact that nukes have not been deployed sounds so much like a gambler that keeps believing that they will never roll snake eyes because they haven't yet. So far Russia has not needed nukes because they are winning. Everything else looks more and more like the west is desperate for him to use them. Putin declares a "Red Line" NATO/ US immediately jump over it.
unfortunately there are people who still thinks Russia will loose the war.🤣 Even if Nato was to join Ukraine tomorrow Russia will NEVER loose the war. WHY? because the moment they feel like their military power is overwhelmed it qualifies as a "substantial threat to their existence". and they shall Nuc as many Nato countries as possible. They will make sure America gets a fair share of about 1000 heads. It wont matter the end, There is NO world without Russia. I mean, what has happened to logic?? ALL this because the west insist Ukraine must join Nato??? OMG
@@Paulusmus Who would dare strike Putin back ? Ukraine does not have any nuclear weapon. And when the west sees a Ukrainian city incinerated, why would they strike at Russia and have their cities incinerated ? Good try, but delusional. The west will save its skin.
What are they talking about that Russia is causing confusion with nuclear Sabre rattling? Russia has a written protocol for use of nuclear weapons, transparent and known. Unlike the US, whose policy wrt to nuclear weapons is wilfully ambiguous.
Russia was promised that NATO would not move closer to Russia by the collective west. But then they did, and continue to try to surround Russia. Why is this never discussed?
Academics have discussed this A LOT, especially over recent years as declassified govt documents from the early 1990s have become available. Four points: 1. Nothing was given, or asked for, in writing. 2. Verbal statements at the time about NATO not moving 'to the east' were sought, understood - and given - in the specific context of the-then DDR. Pledges there were made and kept. 3. As late as August 1993 President Boris Yeltsin publicly stated that NATO enlargement to Poland did not threaten Russia's security interests. 4. Even with Sweden and Finland added, Russia only shares 12 per cent of its borders with NATO member states, so not exactly "surrounded". So let's indeed debate.....but not simply assume.😊
@@PeckhamHall Memorandum of Conversation Date: Friday, February 9, 1990 Time: 1:00PM - 3.00PM Place: Kremlin Participants: Secretary Baker (James Baker US Secretary of State) President Gorbachev (Mikhail Gorbachev - Soviet President) Eduard Shevardnadze (Soviet Minister of Foreign Affairs) Memcon from 2/9/90 United Stated Department Washington DC 20520 Meeting w/USSR President Gorbachev and FM Shevardnadze Moscow, USSR We understand the need for assurances to the countries in the East. If we maintain a presence in Germany that is a part of NATO, there would be no expansion of NATO's jurisdiction for forces of NATO one inch to the east. At the end of the day, if it is acceptable to everyone, we could have a discussion in a two plus four concept That might achieve this type of outcome. Maybe there is a better way to deal with the external consequences of German unification. And if there is I am not aware of it. We don't have German agreement but we have mentioned it to Genscher and he said he wants to think about it. Dumas liked it and now I have mentioned it to you Source: US National Security Archive
@@PeckhamHall what is the point of getting anything in writing. Any document signed by the USA isn't worth the paper it is printed on. It started with the American Indians in the 1800's and continues to this day. try looking on the US National Security Archives website for the memcon (memorandum of conversation) 09 Feb 1990 from US Secretary of State James Baker to USSR President Gorbachev & FM Shevardnadze & yet NATO says the conversation never happened
Why can't we have a leader such as Putin, intelligent, witty ... all he wanted was Ukraine to stay neutral and for the U.S. to get the missile off his border! Very patient man.
Don't include Africa, Asia and South America. Let EU, Britain, and USA worry about nuclear weapons of Russia because They want nuclear war. Don't say the word
Blame it on the cabal of corporate and military leaders who are the true power behind sloppy joe and every other (p)Resident of the white house since 1948. If you saw Joe Biden's senility and *still* manage to delude yourself into believing that the (p)Resident (not just the current one, but ANY of them) make decisions more consequential than the contents/menu of their daily feedings, you were probably not paying attention.
President Putin showed extreme patience but it is time to step up the game!!! Hopefully after Kazan Brics summit!!! Which is why the US and puppet wants to prevent by escalating tension, they want to prevent the summit because they know Western hegemony is dead and retribution is on the way!!!
You speak like someone who don't really comprehends the devastation a nuclear war would have on America, russia and the rest of the world, life as you live it today would be like a long time dream! And is just my analysis, I got 2 kids in America which i dont want them to die for the foolishness of the crazy US government. The real question is what do you care to have nuke in Ukraine or that Ukraine become a nato member or not? Is worth you kids lives and future? If so why aint you fighting for the Ukrainians!? To what end!? The world has changed! We're not in the 40s or even the 90s! America has lost hegemony and the US government better learn how to play fair with other! So what after russia you think you gonna go and set up nuke or ask Taiwan to be a nato member as well and set up nuke over there too? 😂 you must be one of these warmongers to high on your own dope to see the reality! Never been to russia but live 20 yrs in the states so keep listening to your fake media propaganda and gamble Americans lives. Where i am nuclear war wont touch me nor affect my life despite what Hollywood got you believed! So good luck to you make sure you vote Harris and you'll get what you want so bad!
Americans and their subservient european vassals better start contemplating the scenario of post civilization they are pursuing so enthusiastically! I do recommend less than clever western leaders to watch the movie MAD Max for inspiration.
The United Fakes of Amnesia literally took the world to the brink of "nuke-you-ler" (as Americans say it) war in October, 1961 over the fake "issue" of "Russian missiles on Cuban soil" all the while having nuclear missiles stationed in Turkiye mere miles from the Russian border. The Americans are hypocrites and suffer from convenient "amnesia" while the Turks appear to be two-faced liars who are not only betray their own alliance, but also their "strategic partners" in Russia with such false narratives produced and disseminated by the Turkish state media.
Well, let`s compare the US nuclear doctrine with the Russian nuclear doctrine. As I recall, since G. W. Bush, the US uses a preemptive attack doctrine. Let see now the Russian modification to nuclear doctrine
The USA, through-out the Cold War (1.0) maintained a nuclear posture that explicitly and openly stated its intentions to use ("battlefield", or "tactical") nuclear weapons in Europe to defend against an anticipated overwhelming land assault by Soviet forces. The US and its vassals never had enough forces to contend with a full-on Soviet invasion, and they knew it. Their only hope was to play the "mad dog" strategy. And now, when the tables are turned, they predictably want to paint this as somehow a unique and "evil" threat against all of humanity, and lay the blame solely at the door of Russia. They may get away with it too, thanks to the systematic defunding of history as a specialization and academic subject, both at the grammar school and university level. Depriving humanity of our historical memory is the surest route for the Deep State to have free reign in manipulating us in the "Zen" present where the past does not exist.
The Braw lady is mangling history. First Ukraine never had full control of nukes used on its soil. Secondly, Ukraine's security is predicated on it not being a threat to Russia which joining NATO certainly did.
Listening to these three dunderheads is frightening. Only Marco has a clear head. Russia is being explicit. Not “hints,” Martin. Elizabeth in particular has a head full of fog. Most frightening of all, Martin truly believes what he’s saying. I hope to God no one in power listens to him. He lives in some fantasy chess game, next door to Elizabeth, who is high on academia.
Insuring Ukraine national integrity by Russia , did not mean allowing Nato or Western weapons Into the Ukraine , and or for America to establish itself inside Ukraine.
The west acts dumb as to how russains will predictable think. Operating on a do the opposite and lie about everything manual. It's a bit like the behaviour of a child. Not that the west is a golden boy it's just the west top people no these things and the media just bs the public. The media are only semi useful. You need a good grounding of history and future ology to see the realities and most likely outcomes
If Russia uses nuclear weapons in Ukraine, US will step back. You think US will threaten her citizens security because of Ukraine. Europe should have a re-think.
17:05 Pondering a very atypical reaction for a Russian government, perhaps not so atypical for a Western "power". Also a bit unspecific in view of the fact that there are tactical nuclear weapons that provide about ten times the explosive/ radiation yield of the Hiroshima bomb.
They would likely launch when Europe is in deep winter so as to escalate logistics food issues across Europe and create runs on banks and supermarkets.
Not as big a threat to world peace as nato has been. Serbia, Iraq, Libya, Syria. I live in the UK, these constant provocations against Russia by my government is going to have dire consequences for my country.
The fact that those tools were made let's just know that at one point they will be used. Since at one time some country has ever used them. Don't waste our time.
Martin u r living in a dinasour age. You overestimate about USA military capabilities in view of Of what Defense Sec Austin said that today n now Russia can defeat USA
Which global security are we more concerned of more than the risk we are facing when nato is moving closer ro russian borders? The west is worst so called civilized people i have ever heard of...
no such thingit's called geo engineering no climate the pentagon along with other power are toying with the worlds weather not just some agent orange field in Vietnam, but worldwide .. look it up. it is all in the pentagons released information and operations how they do it the tech behind it and how it is implemented .. go ahead start digging and wake up to the lies
🚨 In my humble opinion? When Mr. Putin decides to use Nuclear options it will not be limited to tactical nuclear weapons and all of Europe 🌍 and North America will be within range and will not go unscathed
Unfortunately, we are reliving the Cuban missile crisis in the 21st century. Except this time it's the Ukraine missile crisis. This has to stop before the unavoidable occurs even if they are tactical nuclear weapons. Russia just like any other major superpower nation will and can defend itself by any means necessary. There are many people on Monday night quarterbacking a dangerous situation.
RUSSIA if it vould would exercise first use, so why USA give up such tactic Autocracies by their very nature would have first use, were there no (ending), Devastating conseqyences
just keep in mind while watching this that biden basically removed any restrictions contained in US doctrine. also the commentary in this show is what i would expect from children.
think its silly people sit and talk like its a bad thing that they have moved the line we should be thankful that they did as no one wins if nukes start to fly this dose not make them weak they are just showing they are the smart ones i think
what are your long-range missiles looking for on Russia. Russia does not need a nuclear missile to destroy Great Britain. If you send your weapons to Russia, you can expect to disappear in the depths of the ocean. But such a thing does not require nuclear weapons!
Consldering the destructive effect and result of the use of nuclear weapons, not even in joke should we mention their use. The mere mention of this weapon makes me tremble!
Why everyone is talking only about Russia & Putin? Why not talking about Zelensky, Keir Starmer, Macron, and Biden? Why not talking aboutWhy Russia & N Korea Nuclear stocks only a matter of concern? Why not US, UK, France, China, India, Pakistan, nuclear stocks to the rest of the world? It is clear from the wording itself, the west (US and its NATO allies) is concerned and not the rest.
There is no needed to change the doctrine of nuclear weapons use.if Putin so wishes let him just use it without making noises to people.its even possible that he is not capable to use it but hiding behind the doctrine which he signed himself.
Russia never said that it will use nuclear weapons if Sweden and Finland joined NATO. Lies
In your dreams you heard this from a Russian official. And, so, wake up! And look on the Iskander rocket mobile units movement as a response to what you said Sweden and Finland
Of course...mainstream propaganda
The US is the only country that has used nuclear bombs. They can do things no other country is allowed to.
True Russia did not said but Russia said it will tighten the boarder security
Actually, he did and I hope he seriously means it.
Why don't you also ask how much of a risk does NATO and the US pose to the rest of the world? Nato and the US have been involved in never ending wars for as long as I can remember
@ItzAlinYTCheck who is causing coups in Africa 🤡🤡 The West are colonia1 imperiali$ts
Someone's redefining imperialist
Contre des dictateurs inhumains et terroristes !!!
Imperialism & self-righteousness has deep roots in Western media houses and some people behind the curtains🙃💀☠️......
Russians celestial patience will not last forever.
Yes, GOD very angry mad Sins Mankind🕯
Well said, lot of people now know Ukraine proxy war is not about Ukrainians but rather,to destabilise Russia cause regime change and try to partition Russia. That have woefully failed, the Russian are more united than before. Let the so called west continue to escalate and push Ukraine, those nuclear weapons are not meant animals, and definitely going to be used one day, The world is very closer to that. Russia non strategic nuclear weapons have a yield of between 40 -70 kilotons
They should get out of Ukrainian soil.
Exactly
Hearing the west continue to trumpet the fact that nukes have not been deployed sounds so much like a gambler that keeps believing that they will never roll snake eyes because they haven't yet. So far Russia has not needed nukes because they are winning. Everything else looks more and more like the west is desperate for him to use them. Putin declares a "Red Line" NATO/ US immediately jump over it.
If Russia finally use Nuclear weapons, will the West stil say that it use was unprovoked 😂😂😂😂
unfortunately there are people who still thinks Russia will loose the war.🤣 Even if Nato was to join Ukraine tomorrow Russia will NEVER loose the war. WHY? because the moment they feel like their military power is overwhelmed it qualifies as a "substantial threat to their existence". and they shall Nuc as many Nato countries as possible. They will make sure America gets a fair share of about 1000 heads. It wont matter the end, There is NO world without Russia. I mean, what has happened to logic?? ALL this because the west insist Ukraine must join Nato??? OMG
Always ... but not forever⌛
Putin will get one back
@@Paulusmus Who wins in a nuclear war?
@@Paulusmus Who would dare strike Putin back ? Ukraine does not have any nuclear weapon. And when the west sees a Ukrainian city incinerated, why would they strike at Russia and have their cities incinerated ?
Good try, but delusional. The west will save its skin.
Russian warning is not taken seriously by the Western experts.
They will take Russia seriously when the crow will pup on the head from the air.
😂😂 Who from West is Expert.. They never goes to War or some conflict..
Stupidity of west is not negotiation but escalating
Ce que propose la Russie n'est pas une négociation.
@@pauldreze3414 that’s right, Russia won’t put up with US expansion on their border. That is not negotiable!
What are they talking about that Russia is causing confusion with nuclear Sabre rattling? Russia has a written protocol for use of nuclear weapons, transparent and known. Unlike the US, whose policy wrt to nuclear weapons is wilfully ambiguous.
the UK and the USA both have nuclear doctrines which are much more agressive. It would be fare if Russia levels it.😂
Russia was promised that NATO would not move closer to Russia by the collective west. But then they did, and continue to try to surround Russia. Why is this never discussed?
Did they get it in writing.
Because The empire and her vassals are hypocrites ,double standards. Turkey is same.
Academics have discussed this A LOT, especially over recent years as declassified govt documents from the early 1990s have become available.
Four points:
1. Nothing was given, or asked for, in writing.
2. Verbal statements at the time about NATO not moving 'to the east' were sought, understood - and given - in the specific context of the-then DDR. Pledges there were made and kept.
3. As late as August 1993 President Boris Yeltsin publicly stated that NATO enlargement to Poland did not threaten Russia's security interests.
4. Even with Sweden and Finland added, Russia only shares 12 per cent of its borders with NATO member states, so not exactly "surrounded".
So let's indeed debate.....but not simply assume.😊
@@PeckhamHall Memorandum of Conversation
Date: Friday, February 9, 1990
Time: 1:00PM - 3.00PM
Place: Kremlin
Participants:
Secretary Baker (James Baker US Secretary of State)
President Gorbachev (Mikhail Gorbachev - Soviet President)
Eduard Shevardnadze (Soviet Minister of Foreign Affairs)
Memcon from 2/9/90
United Stated Department Washington DC 20520
Meeting w/USSR President Gorbachev and FM Shevardnadze
Moscow, USSR
We understand the need for assurances to the countries in the East.
If we maintain a presence in Germany that is a part of NATO,
there would be no expansion of NATO's jurisdiction for forces of NATO one inch to the east.
At the end of the day, if it is acceptable to everyone, we could have a discussion in a two plus four concept
That might achieve this type of outcome.
Maybe there is a better way to deal with the external consequences of German unification.
And if there is I am not aware of it.
We don't have German agreement but we have mentioned it to Genscher and he said he wants to think about it.
Dumas liked it and now I have mentioned it to you
Source: US National Security Archive
@@PeckhamHall what is the point of getting anything in writing. Any document signed by the USA isn't worth the paper it is printed on. It started with the American Indians in the 1800's and continues to this day.
try looking on the US National Security Archives website for the memcon (memorandum of conversation) 09 Feb 1990 from US Secretary of State James Baker to USSR President Gorbachev & FM Shevardnadze
& yet NATO says the conversation never happened
Why can't we have a leader such as Putin, intelligent, witty ... all he wanted was Ukraine to stay neutral and for the U.S. to get the missile off his border! Very patient man.
Two lies in the opening statement. Bye bye.
Don't include Africa, Asia and South America. Let EU, Britain, and USA worry about nuclear weapons of Russia because They want nuclear war. Don't say the word
Keep Australia out of this mess
Nuclear Winter is not going to be limited to the nothern hemisphere.
This is real people wake up
Russia have right to defend his self ....
Who attack Russia? Or Russia is invading Ukraine?
la russie est l'agresseur.
Blame it on sleepy Joe please. Stop poking the bear and expect zero response
Blame it on Jorge Bush that in 2008 declared at the end of NATO's summit in Bucarest that Ukraine and Georgia would join NATO!
@@fingerprint8479WARCRIMINAL GEORGE BUSH!!!
@@fingerprint8479And left the ABM treaty.
Blame it on the cabal of corporate and military leaders who are the true power behind sloppy joe and every other (p)Resident of the white house since 1948.
If you saw Joe Biden's senility and *still* manage to delude yourself into believing that the (p)Resident (not just the current one, but ANY of them) make decisions more consequential than the contents/menu of their daily feedings, you were probably not paying attention.
😂😂😂😂😂😂
President Putin showed extreme patience but it is time to step up the game!!! Hopefully after Kazan Brics summit!!! Which is why the US and puppet wants to prevent by escalating tension, they want to prevent the summit because they know Western hegemony is dead and retribution is on the way!!!
Nope
You speaking like Russia is the only one who can launch nukes 😂
You speak like someone who don't really comprehends the devastation a nuclear war would have on America, russia and the rest of the world, life as you live it today would be like a long time dream! And is just my analysis, I got 2 kids in America which i dont want them to die for the foolishness of the crazy US government. The real question is what do you care to have nuke in Ukraine or that Ukraine become a nato member or not? Is worth you kids lives and future? If so why aint you fighting for the Ukrainians!? To what end!? The world has changed! We're not in the 40s or even the 90s! America has lost hegemony and the US government better learn how to play fair with other! So what after russia you think you gonna go and set up nuke or ask Taiwan to be a nato member as well and set up nuke over there too? 😂 you must be one of these warmongers to high on your own dope to see the reality! Never been to russia but live 20 yrs in the states so keep listening to your fake media propaganda and gamble Americans lives. Where i am nuclear war wont touch me nor affect my life despite what Hollywood got you believed! So good luck to you make sure you vote Harris and you'll get what you want so bad!
Well done, beautiful Russia, the future is yours!!!! Love from Australia ❤❤❤
Nope
@@Paulusmushow dare you speak for Australia! Putin’s mafia regime is an enemy to all democratic nations including Australia!
@@Paulusmus you support warmongering USA & UK then yeah?
@@Paulusmus ukra bot detected… sad one..)))
Des cons il y en a partout.
Americans and their subservient european vassals better start contemplating the scenario of post civilization they are pursuing so enthusiastically!
I do recommend less than clever western leaders to watch the movie MAD Max for inspiration.
Ummmm....YOU better think about it. Because you will live it. DUHHHR
@@RC_Turbo "Live" is optimistic...
We will al experience it!
The Western so called "leaders", judging by their actions are clowns living in a phantasy universe...
I believe at some point Putin's patience will die down.
Don't play with BRICS Natoma knows this
So, let's keep crossing those red lines until one finally works.
The USA would not put up with this nonsense so why would Russia, America has had its day on the world stage , it over for them now
The United Fakes of Amnesia literally took the world to the brink of "nuke-you-ler" (as Americans say it) war in October, 1961 over the fake "issue" of "Russian missiles on Cuban soil" all the while having nuclear missiles stationed in Turkiye mere miles from the Russian border. The Americans are hypocrites and suffer from convenient "amnesia" while the Turks appear to be two-faced liars who are not only betray their own alliance, but also their "strategic partners" in Russia with such false narratives produced and disseminated by the Turkish state media.
Only one person speaks the truth and have common sense around that table
Exactly.... Marko Gasic.
Marko the only intelligent person on the panel
Why Israel have nuclear weapons and no sanction on then?
Les houtis méritent de très fortes représailles comme le hamas et le hesbolah.,
Cause the are not barbaric muslims
Well, let`s compare the US nuclear doctrine with the Russian nuclear doctrine. As I recall, since G. W. Bush, the US uses a preemptive attack doctrine. Let see now the Russian modification to nuclear doctrine
The USA, through-out the Cold War (1.0) maintained a nuclear posture that explicitly and openly stated its intentions to use ("battlefield", or "tactical") nuclear weapons in Europe to defend against an anticipated overwhelming land assault by Soviet forces. The US and its vassals never had enough forces to contend with a full-on Soviet invasion, and they knew it. Their only hope was to play the "mad dog" strategy. And now, when the tables are turned, they predictably want to paint this as somehow a unique and "evil" threat against all of humanity, and lay the blame solely at the door of Russia.
They may get away with it too, thanks to the systematic defunding of history as a specialization and academic subject, both at the grammar school and university level. Depriving humanity of our historical memory is the surest route for the Deep State to have free reign in manipulating us in the "Zen" present where the past does not exist.
They did already the most powerful country in the world have a lot of patience. They will bite one day 😂
I think the uk should be the first scape goat
Sure, if Putin wants some back 😁
Ukraine is an example of how bad it is to be an ally of the United States.
What are you talking about? Ukraine is winning. Zelensiky is an amazing leader. Russia is bad. US is good and UK is super power full, of BS
Just NATO- the rest of world gets along with Russia just fine.
The Braw lady is mangling history. First Ukraine never had full control of nukes used on its soil. Secondly, Ukraine's security is predicated on it not being a threat to Russia which joining NATO certainly did.
Listening to these three dunderheads is frightening. Only Marco has a clear head. Russia is being explicit. Not “hints,” Martin. Elizabeth in particular has a head full of fog. Most frightening of all, Martin truly believes what he’s saying. I hope to God no one in power listens to him. He lives in some fantasy chess game, next door to Elizabeth, who is high on academia.
They would be suffering from a nuclear war, their luxurious life will be in ????😅😅😅😅
Western is a treat to global security.. history shows
Insuring Ukraine national integrity by Russia , did not mean allowing Nato or Western weapons
Into the Ukraine , and or for America to establish itself inside Ukraine.
Britain needs to keep hands to themselves, don’t poke the Bear
Do you think Vlatimir Putin is bluffing ok let USA NATO Zelensky pick a try
Action speaks louder than words,too many warnings like a barking dog
The west acts dumb as to how russains will predictable think. Operating on a do the opposite and lie about everything manual. It's a bit like the behaviour of a child. Not that the west is a golden boy it's just the west top people no these things and the media just bs the public. The media are only semi useful. You need a good grounding of history and future ology to see the realities and most likely outcomes
US already revised it so why not Russia
Never heard you saying anything when that happen with US one
If Russia uses nuclear weapons in Ukraine, US will step back. You think US will threaten her citizens security because of Ukraine. Europe should have a re-think.
17:05 Pondering a very atypical reaction for a Russian government, perhaps not so atypical for a Western "power". Also a bit unspecific in view of the fact that there are tactical nuclear weapons that provide about ten times the explosive/ radiation yield of the Hiroshima bomb.
They would likely launch when Europe is in deep winter so as to escalate logistics food issues across Europe and create runs on banks and supermarkets.
Luckily for Europe, the wind still blows East to West. Bring it
The Roundtable by Gonzalo Lira ( RIP) used to be a platform made up of a learned and objective team.
Not as big a threat to world peace as nato has been. Serbia, Iraq, Libya, Syria. I live in the UK, these constant provocations against Russia by my government is going to have dire consequences for my country.
Britain is a small country. Just imagine - one nuclear bm, scary
Listening to the host, it’s as if he wants Russian to use nuclear weapons. Russia doesn’t have a first use policy.
The fact that those tools were made let's just know that at one point they will be used. Since at one time some country has ever used them. Don't waste our time.
Unfortunately, the U.S. is a declining empire.
So, the objective is to find the nuclear threshold of Russia. Amazing!!
Throughout history, empires never know when to stop expanding until its too late
It's NATO and west not the rest of world
Who is causing this war behind the curtain...?
Let F around and find out.
Martin u r living in a dinasour age. You overestimate about USA military capabilities in view of Of what Defense Sec Austin said that today n now Russia can defeat USA
Which global security are we more concerned of more than the risk we are facing when nato is moving closer ro russian borders? The west is worst so called civilized people i have ever heard of...
Nukes fly both ways ! Putin should remember that!
Ahh i see global warming coming😂😂
no such thingit's called geo engineering no climate the pentagon along with other power are toying with the worlds weather not just some agent orange field in Vietnam, but worldwide .. look it up. it is all in the pentagons released information and operations how they do it the tech behind it and how it is implemented .. go ahead start digging and wake up to the lies
doing good Russia,not global treat,only nato problems
🚨 In my humble opinion? When Mr. Putin decides to use Nuclear options it will not be limited to tactical nuclear weapons and all of Europe 🌍 and North America will be within range and will not go unscathed
May be his nuclear bomb is as bad as his tanks.
The Gentleman at the table(not the moderator) is the only sensible fellow in the room
What if Londonstan is hit.
Thank you Mr Markov for exactly replicating my own point of view.
You provoked the whole situation in the first place.
Unfortunately, we are reliving the Cuban missile crisis in the 21st century. Except this time it's the Ukraine missile crisis. This has to stop before the unavoidable occurs even if they are tactical nuclear weapons. Russia just like any other major superpower nation will and can defend itself by any means necessary. There are many people on Monday night quarterbacking a dangerous situation.
Put your pride aside and come to table
I can't believe people are taking about nuclear weapons like fire arms.
RUSSIA if it vould would exercise first use, so why USA give up such tactic Autocracies by their very nature would have first use, were there no (ending), Devastating conseqyences
As long as Putin in power the World will mot be at peace!
Is it if or when?
Well done marko, you show true intellect and precise knowledge on the matter, while the other 2 guest play catch up
There was also a promise from the West not to spread Nato eastward.
Marko the only rational mind in the room
The bible says, the King does not have swords for show of. Thats my advice
Romans 13 vs 4-7
Thanks for this important conversation about protection of humanity in the world.
I totally agree!! We are going down a dangerous road
Not possibility. Just it is coming.
America and Europe countries are thereat to universe
The lady sitting is absolutely not understanding the after effects of nuclear attack. She will have no time to smile.
just keep in mind while watching this that biden basically removed any restrictions contained in US doctrine. also the commentary in this show is what i would expect from children.
AS LONG as a fraction of China
Military presence in Rusia territory , Pitin will NOT use nuclear mass distraction weapons.
Elisabeth, the innocent villager who thinks she can operate a nuclear weapon with a key.
It was the,maidan coup in 2014 by west russia was not threaten in kursk invade
think its silly people sit and talk like its a bad thing that they have moved the line we should be thankful that they did as no one wins if nukes start to fly this dose not make them weak they are just showing they are the smart ones i think
Imagine if Hitler had Nuclear weapons.
Watch "The Man in the High Castle", amazing tv series where Germany wins WWII.
Then we wouldnt be commenting on youtube right now😅
Point of correction not the rest of the world but only NATO countries.
Be aware that NATO crossed the Red line all the time. NaTO is a war machine
We are not fool
Nato is
The Bear's 🐻 patience is wearing thin with these imperialist bullies.
20yrs the US was not able to destroy the taliban this panel is talking about jack solvien
what are your long-range missiles looking for on Russia. Russia does not need a nuclear missile to destroy Great Britain.
If you send your weapons to Russia, you can expect to disappear in the depths of the ocean. But such a thing does not require nuclear weapons!
This Podcast is full of incorrect statements and information about real capabilities of the Russian armed forces.
Consldering the destructive effect and result of the use of nuclear weapons, not even in joke should we mention their use. The mere mention of this weapon makes me tremble!
they have a right to defend themselves! Do not turn facts around!
Why everyone is talking only about Russia & Putin? Why not talking about Zelensky, Keir Starmer, Macron, and Biden? Why not talking aboutWhy Russia & N Korea Nuclear stocks only a matter of concern? Why not US, UK, France, China, India, Pakistan, nuclear stocks to the rest of the world? It is clear from the wording itself, the west (US and its NATO allies) is concerned and not the rest.
No. Any nuclear weapon is a threat to humanity.
AMERICA DOES NOT FEAR RUSSIA PERIOD!
They do
US does not have modernised nuclear weapons
Trust me America and Germany got the good eyes we all monitor and can see
Good eye when your F satellite destroyed- can't hear and listen to Col.Macgregor & USA Weapon Inspector ?
There is no needed to change the doctrine of nuclear weapons use.if Putin so wishes let him just use it without making noises to people.its even possible that he is not capable to use it but hiding behind the doctrine which he signed himself.
We have stuff that makes Numeral weapons obsolete
A threat to the thieves in the US security, not global.
Us 800 air bases in other countries :Threat to the whole universe
no threat to rest of the world, boy, just the EU and the US
This all crap propergander
Then why watch.
IT IS NOT red line mark by Putin around his territory, It's a Chinese red flag not leting him to use it