Thanks for the detailed and easy to follow video. Could you please make a video/tutorial for non-parametric alternative of two-way mixed ANOVA. Thanks!
There are a few options for performing a non-parametric analog of a two-way mixed ANOVA but there are also many discussions on which one and whether one is needed in the first place. I suggest double checking the normality of your data and if applicable, try data transformation or bootstrapping. You may find the mixed ANOVA would suffice.
Thanks alot for this video, its very clear and easy to follow. I was wondering if you wanted to run a 3 way mixed ANOVA can one just include a third variable where you have group*time?
In this case, I would recommend using a mixed effects model, which is the general form of the between-within ANOVA. The lme4 package is a very useful tool to perform this in R.
Thank you Dr A! Very clear!
Thanks for the detailed and easy to follow video. Could you please make a video/tutorial for non-parametric alternative of two-way mixed ANOVA. Thanks!
Dear Dr. Arnel Aguinaldo
Thanks for the excellent video. Please make one video on two way mixed design using non-parametric methods
There are a few options for performing a non-parametric analog of a two-way mixed ANOVA but there are also many discussions on which one and whether one is needed in the first place. I suggest double checking the normality of your data and if applicable, try data transformation or bootstrapping. You may find the mixed ANOVA would suffice.
Thanks alot for this video, its very clear and easy to follow. I was wondering if you wanted to run a 3 way mixed ANOVA can one just include a third variable where you have group*time?
In this case, I would recommend using a mixed effects model, which is the general form of the between-within ANOVA. The lme4 package is a very useful tool to perform this in R.
Hi. Can I get the pdf of the commands used? Thank you for the step-by-step
explanation.
Dear Sir.. I see no sampel dataset and the R-Script has presented.. I hope you could be share in here and many thank..
does X1 refer to participant ID number?
Yes, the column should have been labeled "ID" after I imported the data from the CSV file. A lazy oversight on my part!
What if normality is violated and transforming doesn’t fix this? What is the non-parametric model?