DT PD Scoring shots don’t matter in football, if you don’t kick straight you won’t win a match and that’s a fact, if north were wasting opportunities against a more complete Sydney side, mind you 8 key players out, you would’ve gotten analed, and it doesn’t take a genius to know that.
can i get a uhhh I Age does not matter. McVeigh is a highly skilled player with lots of talent. He’s still a premium star player and he has been throughout his career. McVeigh still has skill so another year would be great. Maybe your old and slow.
The free kicks are a complete lottery - how can coaches be so wrong? If the head coach is sitting in the box looking in amazement like he doesn't know the rules or has coached his players one way and the umpires think the complete opposite there is something VERY wrong here.
He kicks a behind you guys kick out straight to a roo player just like Sinclair we win by 3 points get over it hurtang has no right to kick that anyways get over it
BenProductions Can’t just say get over it, they pay so much for the technology and they dint use it. I’m a swans supporter and I care about this matter, not because Sydney lost, but because the umpiring was just downright poor. You can’t say that you don’t have to,e to review a goal, because according to the umps “every goal is reviewed”.
newsgetsold you never know. The whole match would have changed if it was a point. So it could of been a roo win by lots, Sydney win by lots, north win just or Sydney win just
Bazza Morrison I agree with you. It's called the butterfly effect, isn't it? It's disgraceful that the didn't do an actual score review and spend more time on it. It was clearly touched.
People are blaming the umps cos Sydney lost. North had 2 more scoring shots therefore, north were better. No one would be blaming the umps if Sydney won.
DT PD Ben brown got about 5 free kicks for no reason, then there was a McVeigh bump in the last quarter where your player flopped and got a free kick. Parker marked a ball right in front and hit his hands to the ball first but was deemed Touched, and mind you I’m just telling you the free kicks that were justified by the commentators, I haven’t even started on the mistakes the umpires made in my eyes, the review system? Where is it, they pay money for it and don’t even use it.
Poor umpiring. Call me out for using excuses but I don’t care, several times through the match north was getting silly free kicks, brown got so many useless ones, and north got gifted a goal due to the reviewing system and umpires being dumb. According to the umpires “All goals get reviewed”, obviously not the case. North played well but some of the free kicks, there’s no excuse like the umpires got sucked in by the crowd or anything because north Melbourne’s supporters are like peanuts in Melbourne so imagine Sydney, just so poor.
Sydney swans should of won the game. the umpires were too bad and they need to have a discuss with the AFL HQ office about this because it is not fair and the swans should of got the 4 points tonight and the swans should of won by 5 pts. Just Useless umpiring
Shamini Selvarajah Agreed, they got robbed of 12 Points, McVeigh touched the ball and there was no score review, ended up a north goal and then they got another straight after the centre bounce. The umpires can’t say that “every goal gets reviewed”, this just showed that they lied. There excuse was they didn’t have time. That’s stupid.
If it wasnt a goal swans wouldn’t have gone from the middle and scored straight after. Lots of ifs and buts however it is what it is the game shouldn’t have been close in the first place it’s a “top 4 side” verse a “bottom 4 side”
BenProductions I wouldn’t be making any predictions about the swans right now, they are so unlucky due with injuries, they have one of the smallest sides, Reid, Buddy, Naismith, tippet all out for various reasons, and then there’s Hannebery. Any game they can win is a bonus.
Nathan Lifska swans are a good side but saying they would have won if that was called touched is ignorant as you don’t know what would have happened anyways I’m happy with the win down in the last thought we were finished
BenProductions Neve really said that, to be fair they were both playing to lose, missing opportunities and easy kicks. Despite the score it was a horror show. But as I said before Sydney have no height, so they have to rely on kicking running goals and they were just missing tonight. Never said they would’ve won if it wasn’t a goal though, I just said they got robbed.
I played full forward in this game
1:07 - When youre a 35 year old bloke trying to play AFL
2:39 - When you're a 35 year old bloke trying to play AFL.
Comment on a highlights video isn’t gonna change the fact that Sydney lost
Sydney still could’ve won by a couple of goals if they kicked straight
XBaileyGamerX North had more scoring shots, they were the ones who could have won by more if they kicked straight.
Chuck Gibbs I know that but all the Sydney fans saying they should’ve won
Swans are clear winners. Jarrad McVeigh has clearly touched it. They should review before the bounce!
Jayden Kennedy north still had 2 more scoring shots
DT PD Scoring shots don’t matter in football, if you don’t kick straight you won’t win a match and that’s a fact, if north were wasting opportunities against a more complete Sydney side, mind you 8 key players out, you would’ve gotten analed, and it doesn’t take a genius to know that.
McVeigh is just too old and too slow
can i get a uhhh I Age does not matter. McVeigh is a highly skilled player with lots of talent. He’s still a premium star player and he has been throughout his career. McVeigh still has skill so another year would be great. Maybe your old and slow.
Jayden Kennedy got run downed with a 10m headstart and pushed off the ball with ease time to give it up
The swans should've definitely won...
Who was at the game, i was
The free kicks are a complete lottery - how can coaches be so wrong? If the head coach is sitting in the box looking in amazement like he doesn't know the rules or has coached his players one way and the umpires think the complete opposite there is something VERY wrong here.
2:10 im done signing out see ya later
cheeky grin cheeky cheeky
123456205 haha
The umpires brains didn’t seem to be fully awake when they didn’t score review before they bounced in the middle.
2:11 gotcha
Camera angle at SCG a lil low
I think Sydney should have won, the umpires could have been way better
1:10 it was touched so it should have been a behind. And it should have been a Sydney win.
but it wasn't called and Sydney failed to beat us in 80 minutes of football
He kicks a behind you guys kick out straight to a roo player just like Sinclair we win by 3 points get over it hurtang has no right to kick that anyways get over it
BenProductions Can’t just say get over it, they pay so much for the technology and they dint use it. I’m a swans supporter and I care about this matter, not because Sydney lost, but because the umpiring was just downright poor. You can’t say that you don’t have to,e to review a goal, because according to the umps “every goal is reviewed”.
newsgetsold you never know. The whole match would have changed if it was a point. So it could of been a roo win by lots, Sydney win by lots, north win just or Sydney win just
Bazza Morrison
I agree with you. It's called the butterfly effect, isn't it? It's disgraceful that the didn't do an actual score review and spend more time on it. It was clearly touched.
Go Roos we won yesss
SportsNews King hjbjbhVsbg
What did you say
close game. did not expect north to beat swans
Th3 Zm0nst3r sameee
WHO WILL WIN TIGERS OR fremantle
um... this ain't a tigers game buddy
TIGERS PLAY TOMMROW
EGG
Fremantle dockers
Shamini Selvarajah you're stupid
Solar Fizz a
People are blaming the umps cos Sydney lost. North had 2 more scoring shots therefore, north were better. No one would be blaming the umps if Sydney won.
DT PD that’s because north had 7 more free kicks. Most of which appeared to me for no reason
Tom Marshall first to the ball wins the free, and north got there first 7 more times.
DT PD doesn't quite work like that...
DT PD Ben brown got about 5 free kicks for no reason, then there was a McVeigh bump in the last quarter where your player flopped and got a free kick. Parker marked a ball right in front and hit his hands to the ball first but was deemed Touched, and mind you I’m just telling you the free kicks that were justified by the commentators, I haven’t even started on the mistakes the umpires made in my eyes, the review system? Where is it, they pay money for it and don’t even use it.
Nathan Lifska Take off your Swans glasses nuffy, you’re embarrassing yourself.
😂😂 2:10
Poor umpiring. Call me out for using excuses but I don’t care, several times through the match north was getting silly free kicks, brown got so many useless ones, and north got gifted a goal due to the reviewing system and umpires being dumb. According to the umpires “All goals get reviewed”, obviously not the case. North played well but some of the free kicks, there’s no excuse like the umpires got sucked in by the crowd or anything because north Melbourne’s supporters are like peanuts in Melbourne so imagine Sydney, just so poor.
Solar Fizz To be fair I’ve got a case, and even commentators were ripping into to them after the match about the McVeigh thing.
Nathan Lifska Dude you’re really embarrassing yourself here, you’re as biased as I’ve ever seen.
bad umpiring or not you lost to a team predicted to come last at home, should never be the case.
Chuck Gibbs Commentators and the afl released a tweet themselves.
Nathan Lifska Yes the AFL did tweet about it, they gave the decision the all clear lmao.
Sydney swans should of won the game. the umpires were too bad and they need to have a discuss with the AFL HQ office about this because it is not fair and the swans should of got the 4 points tonight and the swans should of won by 5 pts. Just Useless umpiring
Shamini Selvarajah Agreed, they got robbed of 12 Points, McVeigh touched the ball and there was no score review, ended up a north goal and then they got another straight after the centre bounce. The umpires can’t say that “every goal gets reviewed”, this just showed that they lied. There excuse was they didn’t have time. That’s stupid.
If it wasnt a goal swans wouldn’t have gone from the middle and scored straight after. Lots of ifs and buts however it is what it is the game shouldn’t have been close in the first place it’s a “top 4 side” verse a “bottom 4 side”
BenProductions I wouldn’t be making any predictions about the swans right now, they are so unlucky due with injuries, they have one of the smallest sides, Reid, Buddy, Naismith, tippet all out for various reasons, and then there’s Hannebery. Any game they can win is a bonus.
Nathan Lifska swans are a good side but saying they would have won if that was called touched is ignorant as you don’t know what would have happened anyways I’m happy with the win down in the last thought we were finished
BenProductions Neve really said that, to be fair they were both playing to lose, missing opportunities and easy kicks. Despite the score it was a horror show. But as I said before Sydney have no height, so they have to rely on kicking running goals and they were just missing tonight. Never said they would’ve won if it wasn’t a goal though, I just said they got robbed.
But I have to say north played really good.
Anyone saying Sydney should have won that’s wrong. The umpires were making north look bad mainly...
4th
3rd