🇬🇧BRIT Reacts To TOP 10 CRIMES SOLVED BY TINY DETAILS IN PHOTOS!
Вставка
- Опубліковано 28 вер 2024
- 🇬🇧BRIT Reacts To TOP 10 CRIMES SOLVED BY TINY DETAILS IN PHOTOS!
If You Would Like To Support The Channel: www.paypal.me/kabsayofe
/ kabirconsiders
Hi everyone, I’m Kabir and welcome to another episode of Kabir Considers! In this video I’m Going to React To TOP 10 CRIMES SOLVED BY TINY DETAILS IN PHOTOS!BUILT!
• Top 10 Crimes Solved B...
Follow me on social media:
Instagram: @kabirayofe
Twitter: @kabirconsiders
Email me for business inquiries:
kabirconsiders@yahoo.com
If you would like to send me anything, my PO Box address is;
Kabir Considers
PO Box 5026
Hornchurch
RM12 9JG
United Kingdom
___________________________________________________________________________
COPYRIGHT DISCLAIMER
FAIR USE ACT
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favour of fair use.
ALL RIGHTS BELONG TO THEIR RESPECTIVE OWNERS
Kabir, sentencing disparities in the US can be from many different factors, such as plea deals, confessions or lack thereof, age of the perpetrator, heinousness of the crime, whether or not other crimes we committed at the same time (like robbery and murder, vs just murder) etc. You'd have to look deeper into the crime/court proceedings to find out exactly why.
That's why the system in the US sucks so much. It's just ridiculous.
@@josefinelagerstrom2643 I actually prefer it this way.
Additionally, the U.S. Constitution expressly forbids ex post facto laws (a law that makes illegal an act that was legal when committed, increases the penalties for an infraction after it has been committed, or changes the rules of evidence to make a conviction easier). Due to this, circuit courts have regularly remanded cases back to trial courts for resentencing when defendants were sentenced based on more recent sentencing guidelines instead of the guidelines at the time the offense was committed. So sometimes a sentence might seem short to us now but that was what the sentence was back in 1970-whatever and even though the person wasn't caught and convicted for another 45 years, the court can not add additional time beyond what the sentence would have been at the time of the crime.
it also depends on where you are. in some areas, some crimes have a heavier sentence than other crimes. some prosecutors also will downgrade crime charges or not prosecuted the cases at all like prosecutors in st Louis or chicago.
@@RoseNZiegespecially Chicago smh
Forensic science fascinates me. In another life , that is a field that I would do. Criminals think they are so smart , but police are smarter!
There’s a show called Deadly Recall that a retired police detective takes u threw his old cases and how he solved them with his photographic memory. It’s really fascinating. Also there was a CBS show called Unforgettable that showcases people (in this case a Detective) who remember every detail about their life. U can give them just a date and they can tell u everything that happened that day. Marilu Henner who was in the show Taxi has it it’s called highly superior autobiographical memory (HSAM)
Also if cops/CSI’s store the evidence properly it can last. That’s one of the ways they solve cold cases is retesting DNA evidence since tests have gotten so much better
I’ve seen Unforgettable and loved it. Didn’t know about Deadly Recall tho. Tnx!
@Kabir In the US, when a person is charged with a crime, the sentence they receive is based on the sentencing guidelines at the time of the crime.
So, if they're caught in 2023 for something that they did in 1973, they are charged with that crime, and if convicted, sentenced by 1973 guidelines.
It's not always proper justice received, but thats the criminal justice system.
As always, stay happy healthy and safe. Enjoy your day 🌞 and Keep Smiling 😃🙏
Hello Kabir! Hope you're doing well. 😊
Same, hello from me as well!👋
I don’t understand sentencing guidelines either 🤷♀️
The criminal can only be tried and sentenced under the laws that were in effect at the time of the crime....so in many cold cases they get lighter sentences because those were the sentencing guidelines at the time of said crime
2nd case with the woman i dont think they could determine if it was premeditated and the other dude by bringing the gun was premeditated i imagine...something like that...
And I forget the name but the hacker guy was interviewed for a show about internet stuff and it'll tell you more about why he released cop info....so Google his name and you'll find it
Sometimes the pics' on the wall is the police' downfall...did Keyser Söze ever get caught?🤔
Every state has their own criminal laws and sentences, and the federal government has its own. Judges have some discretion. Plus what @ymw6607 said.
You’d be surprised the difference being in one state vs. another makes. Personally, I’d like to see one set of laws for the country. It would streamline things, cut out a lot of bullshit, and save average people billions in lawyer’s fees. But most of our legislators are lawyers, so it’ll never happen.
I have lived in the USA all my life and will never understand 10 or 20 years an eye for a eye sounds good to me .
It's California. 26 years, that went back to what the punishment would've been back then. Texas does this crap also to old cold cases.
The last video (7 year sentence) was in Canada, not the US. The US would have given a longer sentence.
Yes, that sentence dose not make any sense to me. To me death row.
Uh the video said Canada so you're the only one thinking about the US🤦
@@kimson305she was just clarifying to Kabir that it was Canada. Relax, honey.
@@Brenda-xz9vhexcept we dont have the Death Penalty here in Canada. I am surprised though. Usually murder charges get 25 to life here (25 years and then you go thru the parole process) at the very least for murder unless it's particularly awful.
My dad was a homicide detective most of his career. Growing up I couldn’t bullshit him one bit 😂
Each state in america has different rules when it comes to sentences. I've heard of cases where someone will plan a murder and carry it out and get like 20 to 30 years and other cases where someone commits insurance fraud and get 50 or 60 years. It boggles the mind when you start to look into it.
My son has a Master's Degree in Criminology. He does these behind the scenes digging for a living. I like to think I have Observational skills, and he turned out to be in his profession from all of the Criminal Minds episodes we watched together!! 😊
A gormer police chief almost got away with murder. His wife was found dead in an apparent suicide. He was caught when a detective wwas going over the crime scene photos and realizes the bloody hin was in the wifes right hand and the wound eas on her right temple. The wife was left handed and her right hand had been injured years before rendering her unable to hold anything with her right hand.
The tire tracks photo in ‘My Cousin Vinny.’
A persons criminal history, the exactly charges . If they are charged with murder was it premeditated, accidental, or " crime of passion". Also It depends on the judge , how the person acted, the family of the victim and are they truly sorry . Usually it comes down to a plea deal. People will plead guilty in turn get less time. If you go to trial usually you get the max if found guilty. Example you get in a argument with a friend and you hit them and they die. If you plead guilty and take the plea you might get around 6 to 10 years with parole after 80%. Your probably serve 6 years if you have no record . If you go to trial and found guilty you would get. 20 to 25 years with parole after 80%. This is just a example and not exact time you would get as many factors play a part.
My niece’s oldest daughter was murdered three years ago and it still has not been solved.
Murder is one of those things you never think would happened to your family until it happens to your family
Why only 26 years? Because its California
Why only 7 years? Because Canada
Why just seven? Well, that was Canada and they were minors. My guess is Canada doesn't try a child "as an adult" (an oxymoron).
When someone is caught committing a crime that can lead to a trial, the prosecutor will often look at the case and will add as many charges as they possibly can to increase the maximum possible sentence. They do this as a bargaining chip in an effort to get the suspect to plead guilty to lesser charges without taking the case to trial. These added charges might be difficult to get convictions on but they are legitimate and the potential prison time they add very often gets the desired result. It is one of the reasons that you will see very different sentences for what appears to be similar crimes. If someone refuses the plea bargain when offered, and takes the case to trial, they are going to most likely be sentenced to the maximum amount of time allowed where someone who does accept it can see a much. much lower sentence. It can be assumed that this is not only to punish them for not taking the plead bargain, but also to show suspects in the future the repercussion for forcing a trial and not taking a deal when offered. There are plenty of things that can be debated in regards to this, but since it is not something that is written into law and is all based on the Prosecutor's discretion in charging the suspect and also in what is offered in the terms or a plea bargain and the Judge's acceptance of the terms, it is unlikely to change.
For perspective, "Nearly 80,000 people were defendants in federal criminal cases in fiscal 2018, but just 2% of them went to trial. The overwhelming majority (90%) pleaded guilty instead, while the remaining 8% had their cases dismissed."
7:46 - Some people have prior arrests which can up the sentence and without a complete list of all the charges there's really no way to tell what their sentence was based on. They just don't provide enough info in the video.
The state the crime is committed in matters as well. Laws/penalties in one state won't necessarily be the same as other states.
Who gives their kid the middle name Dill when the last name starts with Do?
the number 7 one is the proper time for a person to serve for sexual crimes 110 years
Thank You. Great Video 😊
Wtf is up with sentencing?!! Jesus Christ. My friends dad was stabbed to death without warning and got only six yrs. Probably out in four. Completely fucked up. Thats not true justice.
Why only 26 years? Because California doesn't like punishing criminals as much as other states.
Kabir, the reason why that one guy only got 26 years is most likely because of his age at the time the crime was committed, OR because he was able to make a plea bargain with prosecutors so he would receive the sentence for a lesser crime (e.g. manslaughter instead of murder), OR because the sentence has changed since then. Let's say someone commits a crime in 1970, and the punishment for that crime is 20 years in prison. But let's say they don't catch the guy until 1990. Let's also say that in 1986, the sentence was changed to 50 years in prison. By law, _he cannot be given 50 years,_ because that is the sentence NOW. It was not the sentence THEN, when he actually committed the crime.
Also, different states can have different sentences. A great example is the death penalty, which is only legal in 27 states. The other 23 states will _not_ give someone a death penalty; instead, they'll give him life in prison. Another example is adultery, which is still a crime in 16 states. The punishment in Michigan can be LIFE IMPRISONMENT. But in Maryland, the punishment is... a $10 fine. That's right, 10 bucks. (The laws against adultery are seldom, if ever, enforced, unless you are in the military.)
Number four. The sentencing was 26 years because the killer was a teenager at the time he killed his victim. If he was 18 or older, his sentence would have been longer.
Dude, we have found dinosaur DNA. DNA can last forever given the right circumstances.
No DNA only lasts about a million years in the best of conditions
No, DNA has a life span. Estimates say it halves every 500 years until it's so degraded there's barely anything left. What you're thinking is the method they used from Jurassic Park which is completely fictional.
That being said, there is a race to find DNA from a mammoth. They died out 10,000 years ago, so there's a chance we could still find DNA and clone it.
@@477sierra they have DNA from wooly mammoths. The issue is getting an Indian elephant they could in theory be used in the cloning process
@@morewi Yes and no. The DNA they got was from permafrost which means it's too degraded. As you said, they could use it to create a hybrid but it wouldn't have the same genetic sequence of a true whoolly mammoth. Not unless we can find more DNA samples, preferably outside of permafrost damage.
@@477sierra they have enough DNA to where they can identify different families and sub groups of mammoths. They could create a pure one now but they need an Indian elephant to give birth to it. No one to use one for a risky experiment like cloning when it could be used to give birth to other Indian elephants
The "why" in the un-equal punishments is the result of deals the lawyers/law enforcement make in order to get a conviction. Justice is NOT blind, fair, equal, nor balanced in anyway whatsoever in the USA. It's based on money, politics and demographics (race, gender, sexual orientation, financial status etc...) period.
Canada can be weird about their sentences....
Hi Kabir....I'm back
26 years, CA.
Amazing!
Depends on type of murder.. depends on mental capacity of person - say he’s slow or retarded etc maybe charged with manslaughter etc
More likely the disparity was 60= Black, 26=White
Or the real reason they added on weapons charges and robbery charges
Exactly what I thought! Race of the accused strongly affects sentencing.
I KNEW someone was going to say this, when you actually have no idea that that's actually the case and that there wasn't some other reason. People need to stop claiming absolutely everything is racist without even knowing all of the information. It's not helping *anything* - it's actually only hurting society and the people you would probably claim to want to help.
@@LadyBeyondTheWall he doesn't want to help it
The guy that got 60 years was an adult that committed a premeditated robbery/murder. The guy that got 26 years was a high school student and minor at the time of his crime. That's the difference and was clearly stated in the video, race didn't have anything to do with anything. I'm not saying that sentencing disparities due to race don't happen, because they do (particularly in the past)... but claiming that every single thing is racial even when it's not is just ridiculous and doesn't help anything.