Tab phir ladies log fata jeans allowed hain public place mein , 4 inch clevage dikhati hain, to make ke liyey masterbation illegal kyon, woh apna ang ko zaise bhi sukh de. Garam ladki ko dekhega to kuch to karna hi hoga. Lagta hain chutia soch ke ho.
Now a days the new judgements looks very different. India is unique in world for its own culture, traditions and unity of emotions. Judiciary should be very strictly respect and carefully mentain this....
It's fundamental right there is no denial of that right...but the said right is subject reasonable restrictions as enumerated under relevant marriage law's
जिनके पास पैसे है! वो लोग ही सुप्रीम कोर्ट जा के divorce ले सकते है ! बाकी यो की तो जिंदगी खराब हो रही है ! Please,142 के अधिकार या jajment का उपयोग निचली अदालतो को भी दिजिये साहाब! पिढी के पिढी या बरबाद हो रही है ! Please 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏 हाथ जोड कर.हमारे जैसोन की जिंदगी खराब ना होने दिजीये ! और हमारे बच्चे का भविष्य भी ! लोगो के लिये कानुन है! मदत करो !
Man liya fundamental right hain. Phir court besic right kyon laa Raha hain. Zab samvidhan hua na to mobile tha na internet tha, na what's app tha. Phir court ka samvidhan ke upar dadagiri kyon. Apney fundamental right me hi Raho naa.
A person seeking Divorce on "No fault Ground" should not get same benefit, who seek divorce by proving other party fault. A person should not be punished for "No Fault" in name of Irretrievably Break Down of Marriage. It should be a Property Garbing Law. We proposed earlier "No Fault Divorce" on ground Irretrievably Break Down of Marriage, Maintenance amount must be decided on duration of marriage, otherwise it will be unfair & will lead to injustice.
Prenuptial agreement should be made mandatory. Whatever these legal pundits claim , these are bunch of stupids without proper understanding of basic realities. Many times murders in families are either direct or indirectly resulted from failed marriages without a way to get out. If and marriage fails for any reason , irrespective of consent of other spouse one should be able to peacefully get out of marriage without facing criminal charges. Marriage is civil contract . The idea that marriage is sacrosanct is crappy. People should change with time. Brokers in black coats are morally and intellectually incompetent to decide course of things for society.
Indira jaising is an absolute jewel . she's actually addressing the real issue of trap of marriage in which one is stuck and no way out. irretrievably breakdown must be a ground for divorce even without count of other spouse who's is adamant to let go.
@@subratashome6393 earlier the party can not directly come to sc . And both partied must agree. But in this case matter is 1. Can one come directly to sc and 2. Can one party to marriage Can file for I B. It will be landmark judgment which will save men women from trap of dead marriage.
Keep two people pressed together(absolute unable to stand each other's presence) until a divorce case turns, unfortunately, into some "murder" case....!!!and the most comic part is only string,these judges don't dissolve marriage i.e children.....they are still anyway get ruined , despite these people claiming to be champions of cause of "child's good"...!!! What an irony 😊😊😊
Marriage according Hindu Marriage Act it is sacrosant but in resent days v Indians have become more liberal where the divorce is concerned more than the Europeans Americans and Australians very bad.
Common people are idiots since they are not understanding what game is being played - Irr. breakdown of marriage which they tried to bring in 2012 with this condition that " not only 50% of property inherited , earned and even " future inheritable" property by the husband will go to the women." Now, with anti -Bharat activities at its peak- funded by global left ecosystem with epicentre in Harvard University, they are trying to revive that along with Marital Rape bill... From economic point of view - Since Arneesh Kumar judgement in 2014 putting a stoppage on " instant arrest" ( though in large part of India it still happens) and men fighting back, it has become " difficult" to force the man to get into "settlement" ( where not only the women, police but judiciary had due share of the pie). Currently, Rs.20,000 crore is the size of " settlement industry" - higher than any cottage industry. So, on one hand these anti- national ( under the payroll of Global Left Ecosystem) will bring " Marital Rape" law to put men and his family into lock up ( no questions asked) and on other hand they are trying their best to bring " Irr. breakdown of marriage" with men being robbed of not only their ancestral property but even property that he can earn in future !!
Right to dignified life also provide right to dignified death. Right to association also provides right to dissociation. Keeping a person in unsuccessful marriage where aspirations are not achieved makes person feel undignified. Indian judiciary has time and again stated right to marry and right to a partner of your choice are a part of Right to Life and Personal Liberty protected under Article 21 on the Indian constitution. So, you are wrong when you say divorce is no a fundamental right. Yes there are restrictions as any other fundamental right but still a fundamental right
It may be a fundamental right but marriage is a big adjustment as is envisaged culturally. It is natural too. Hence present dispensation in Law is not bad except that the process in case of divorce needs to be shortened if it is inevitable
Someone pls challenge this also that why should husband be liable to take care of his wife financially after divorce?. She should earn for herself even by physical labour..as SC said regarding husbands who doesn't earn
If it's a law, it should be neutral not biased gender specifically
then comes serious rethinking
Tab phir ladies log fata jeans allowed hain public place mein , 4 inch clevage dikhati hain, to make ke liyey masterbation illegal kyon, woh apna ang ko zaise bhi sukh de. Garam ladki ko dekhega to kuch to karna hi hoga. Lagta hain chutia soch ke ho.
Aap ka Seena me bara breast hain kya?
Lol. Day dreaming are you? It’s always the women who benefit from both marriage and divorce.
true
Right to marry, Right to Divorce. Bharat Humara Desh He Aur Sare Bharatwasi Humare Bhai Bahen He. Say No to marriage, no need to divorce. 😁😁😁😁😁😁😁
Chahe fir vo bhartiya Sweden me hi kyu na raheta ho, finally he to Bhai Bahen hi. 😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁
You should make divorce easy to decrease suicide rates .
Right to procreate with any one. Right to live-in relationship should be fundamental in that case.
Right to life means there should be a prenuptial agreement also
Best 👌🏻👌🏻
as a indian , i would like to call her karen word commonly used in US. many unqualified people still arguing in courts with judges.
Now a days the new judgements looks very different. India is unique in world for its own culture, traditions and unity of emotions. Judiciary should be very strictly respect and carefully mentain this....
For ST category, why do not allow in family court ? This also change.
It's fundamental right there is no denial of that right...but the said right is subject reasonable restrictions as enumerated under relevant marriage law's
जिनके पास पैसे है! वो लोग ही सुप्रीम कोर्ट जा के divorce ले सकते है ! बाकी यो की तो जिंदगी खराब हो रही है ! Please,142 के अधिकार या jajment का उपयोग निचली अदालतो को भी दिजिये साहाब! पिढी के पिढी या बरबाद हो रही है ! Please 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏 हाथ जोड कर.हमारे जैसोन की जिंदगी खराब ना होने दिजीये ! और हमारे बच्चे का भविष्य भी ! लोगो के लिये कानुन है! मदत करो !
Man liya fundamental right hain.
Phir court besic right kyon laa Raha hain. Zab samvidhan hua na to mobile tha na internet tha, na what's app tha. Phir court ka samvidhan ke upar dadagiri kyon. Apney fundamental right me hi Raho naa.
Urban Naxal Chudail !
A person seeking Divorce on "No fault Ground" should not get same benefit, who seek divorce by proving other party fault. A person should not be punished for "No Fault" in name of Irretrievably Break Down of Marriage. It should be a Property Garbing Law. We proposed earlier "No Fault Divorce" on ground Irretrievably Break Down of Marriage, Maintenance amount must be decided on duration of marriage, otherwise it will be unfair & will lead to injustice.
Prenuptial agreement should be made mandatory. Whatever these legal pundits claim , these are bunch of stupids without proper understanding of basic realities.
Many times murders in families are either direct or indirectly resulted from failed marriages without a way to get out.
If and marriage fails for any reason , irrespective of consent of other spouse one should be able to peacefully get out of marriage without facing criminal charges. Marriage is civil contract . The idea that marriage is sacrosanct is crappy. People should change with time.
Brokers in black coats are morally and intellectually incompetent to decide course of things for society.
Indira jaising is an absolute jewel . she's actually addressing the real issue of trap of marriage in which one is stuck and no way out. irretrievably breakdown must be a ground for divorce even without count of other spouse who's is adamant to let go.
Honble SC already allowed decree in many case earlier on the point of irretrievably breakdown of marriage.
@@subratashome6393 earlier the party can not directly come to sc . And both partied must agree. But in this case matter is 1. Can one come directly to sc and 2. Can one party to marriage Can file for I B. It will be landmark judgment which will save men women from trap of dead marriage.
Keep two people pressed together(absolute unable to stand each other's presence) until a divorce case turns, unfortunately, into some "murder" case....!!!and the most comic part is only string,these judges don't dissolve marriage i.e children.....they are still anyway get ruined , despite these people claiming to be champions of cause of "child's good"...!!! What an irony 😊😊😊
All same points are applying for all marriage person
Marriage according Hindu Marriage Act it is sacrosant but in resent days v Indians have become more liberal where the divorce is concerned more than the Europeans Americans and Australians very bad.
Yeh advocate log saat pherey ka mantra nahin suna , sirf teen talaq suna. Hi
Why so many people are roaming around like its bhindi bajar
teri maa ka sasural jo hai ye
She dont know what is a fundamental right
Common people are idiots since they are not understanding what game is being played - Irr. breakdown of marriage which they tried to bring in 2012 with this condition that " not only 50% of property inherited , earned and even " future inheritable" property by the husband will go to the women."
Now, with anti -Bharat activities at its peak- funded by global left ecosystem with epicentre in Harvard University, they are trying to revive that along with Marital Rape bill...
From economic point of view - Since Arneesh Kumar judgement in 2014 putting a stoppage on " instant arrest" ( though in large part of India it still happens) and men fighting back, it has become " difficult" to force the man to get into "settlement" ( where not only the women, police but judiciary had due share of the pie). Currently, Rs.20,000 crore is the size of " settlement industry" - higher than any cottage industry.
So, on one hand these anti- national ( under the payroll of Global Left Ecosystem) will bring " Marital Rape" law to put men and his family into lock up ( no questions asked) and on other hand they are trying their best to bring " Irr. breakdown of marriage" with men being robbed of not only their ancestral property but even property that he can earn in future !!
Please make law for marriage is a crime.never should not be marriage to women.
The whole problems in india is because of distorted intellectuals😜🤫
It is wrong argument. Right to exit marriage is only a legal right...Cannot be elevated to the platform of fundamental right...
Right to dignified life also provide right to dignified death.
Right to association also provides right to dissociation.
Keeping a person in unsuccessful marriage where aspirations are not achieved makes person feel undignified.
Indian judiciary has time and again stated right to marry and right to a partner of your choice are a part of Right to Life and Personal Liberty protected under Article 21 on the Indian constitution.
So, you are wrong when you say divorce is no a fundamental right. Yes there are restrictions as any other fundamental right but still a fundamental right
It may be a fundamental right but marriage is a big adjustment as is envisaged culturally. It is natural too. Hence present dispensation in Law is not bad except that the process in case of divorce needs to be shortened if it is inevitable
Someone pls challenge this also that why should husband be liable to take care of his wife financially after divorce?. She should earn for herself even by physical labour..as SC said regarding husbands who doesn't earn
Indira Madam plzzz share your number me isi tarah ki problm me hun jo ki supream court ki najeer bn skne wale judgment bn ske