Ubik by Philip k. Dick - Gnostic Paranoia - AB+C 99

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 16 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 20

  • @jasonchicago7276
    @jasonchicago7276 Рік тому +8

    This is brilliant. I read Ubik a few years back, and I absolutely loved it, but none of my friends were interested in reading it, so I didn't get to discuss it with anyone. So it's just lovely to hear such a smart conversation about it. I have no idea how the algorithm got me to you, but I'm glad it did.

    • @about_buildings
      @about_buildings  Рік тому +2

      So glad you enjoyed the episode! You can find more discussion of science-fiction in our back catalogue, including Blade Runner, 2001 A Space Odyssey and Akira

  • @MagickLibrary
    @MagickLibrary 2 місяці тому

    Great job mates. Great review

  • @ZakStandridge
    @ZakStandridge 11 місяців тому +1

    cheers, mate

  • @iv7796
    @iv7796 11 місяців тому

    10 more hours of this please

  • @thomasmcgrath1355
    @thomasmcgrath1355 9 місяців тому

    Your Podcast is amazing. I’m sadly binge watching as I work away at my Masters. Your debates are spot on. Thank you!

  • @rezzer7918
    @rezzer7918 2 місяці тому

    Kings Arms Pub
    How COOL 😎

  • @fjuvo
    @fjuvo Рік тому +1

    Will you do some modern architects? Like BIG

  • @ConanDuke
    @ConanDuke 11 місяців тому

    25:00 William Gibson never once painted for us a "cool sci-fi location". All of his descriptions serve the purpose of elaborating how the technology works, and why it does what it does.

    • @about_buildings
      @about_buildings  11 місяців тому +1

      We agree, for more of our thoughts check out our two-part series on Neuromancer: ua-cam.com/video/lmLfkgR1wJ4/v-deo.htmlsi=xSV0xgKSdRrGJheO

  • @jasonchicago7276
    @jasonchicago7276 Рік тому +2

    Do you imagine that Ubik could be made into a commercially viable film?

    • @about_buildings
      @about_buildings  Рік тому +5

      it could work but you'd need to lean into the stylisation / tropiness and flattened affect. weirdly could be quite a good wes anderson film i think.

    • @Cyberfox63
      @Cyberfox63 9 місяців тому

      Only Christopher Nolan could do that

  • @DJchrismiller1
    @DJchrismiller1 3 місяці тому

    I have no idea how you guys sit like that, and for and hour no less. I couldn't sit like that for even one minute.

  • @shellymarstersdon6268
    @shellymarstersdon6268 Рік тому

    It really feels like Dick is trying to promote God and religion with this book. Am I missing something? Or is this just religious propoganda to promote the idea of faith?

    • @lifeisgoodskt
      @lifeisgoodskt 11 місяців тому +4

      Oh no. Not God. Noooop. No one smart can ever believe in anything but nothing mattering! Grow up child

    • @thegeeeeeeeeee
      @thegeeeeeeeeee 2 місяці тому

      I didn’t get that feeling. To me it was more a social commentary about people and technology. As we get more advanced, technology becomes more ubiquitous, like how everyone has smartphones now.
      The spray, Ubik, is what helped the character not get lost in the past. The character was reliant on Ubik to survive. Almost like we are all slaves to modern technology and must use it to not fade away in society. This is reinforced by the door that costs money to open in the apartment. Humans literally become controlled by ubiquitous technology as we advance.
      I don’t know PKDs opinions on the matter of technology, but it was an interesting topic to think about for me.

  • @daves6685
    @daves6685 Рік тому +2

    GREAT DEBATE AND TALK!!!!! THANK YOU!!!!!