So a question then. If I choose to exercise my freedom in a way that infringes upon your pursuit of life liberty and the pursuit of happiness how will I be restrained from harming you?
@@classixdrummer Through Cooperation. Anarchists (at least social anarchists) have a theory of freedom that States that liberty and equality are inseparable. If you want to be free, everyone has to be free. thus the quote "My freedom is your freedom (and vise versa)." if someone is harming others, then others have the ability to defend themselves.
It’s true that some people would need to learn how to be free. That is, to not be a dick to put it simply. Even though it is not guaranteed, by eliminating the need of competing, the likelihood of most folks being empathic and treating their peers as they would like to be treated themselves under similar circumstances would increase. Also, it is socially unacceptable when the behavior of one affects the rest negatively and corrections and reparations would happen faster and with less obstacles. It’s a bumpy road, but worth navigating
@@myself2noone first off, fascism and totalitarianism are not the same thing. Sec, There will be no power vacuums in anarchy. Power is decentralized and there is no power structure that saps power away from the general population. Anarchy is literally self-governance and there's no need for a government to form in anarchy.
![Lp. Сердце Вселенной #60 РОЖДЕНИЕ ЛОЛОЛОШКИ [Финал] • Майнкрафт](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/YoR0pAV9FVQ/mqdefault.jpg)
I am an anarchist and I think this form is the solution to mankind’s problems.
So a question then. If I choose to exercise my freedom in a way that infringes upon your pursuit of life liberty and the pursuit of happiness how will I be restrained from harming you?
@@classixdrummer Through Cooperation. Anarchists (at least social anarchists) have a theory of freedom that States that liberty and equality are inseparable. If you want to be free, everyone has to be free. thus the quote "My freedom is your freedom (and vise versa)." if someone is harming others, then others have the ability to defend themselves.
This would be good if everybody had good intentions. But we live in a world where people will take that freedom and turn it into something bad.
We are a social species. we have evolved empathy. What makes you think that we'd just turn on each other.
It’s true that some people would need to learn how to be free. That is, to not be a dick to put it simply. Even though it is not guaranteed, by eliminating the need of competing, the likelihood of most folks being empathic and treating their peers as they would like to be treated themselves under similar circumstances would increase. Also, it is socially unacceptable when the behavior of one affects the rest negatively and corrections and reparations would happen faster and with less obstacles.
It’s a bumpy road, but worth navigating
No, it will eventually lead to fascism.
How?
Me when I'm delusional
@@myself2noone first off, fascism and totalitarianism are not the same thing.
Sec, There will be no power vacuums in anarchy. Power is decentralized and there is no power structure that saps power away from the general population. Anarchy is literally self-governance and there's no need for a government to form in anarchy.