How a Rocket Works/Earth to Space Eg SpaceX Falcon 9 and Dragon

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 28 лип 2024
  • How a rocket or rocket engine works to go from the surface of the Earth to Space. The example used is SpaceX's Falcon 9 both with their Dragon capsule to go to the International Space Station (ISS) and with Astrobotic Technology's Griffin lander and Red Rover rover to the moon. As well, a simple single stage rocket is used to explain some simple concepts.
    Newton's 1st and 3rd laws, just two of Newton's three laws of motion, are explained along with how they work with gravity to allow rockets to fly and to orbit. What orbiting is is also explained. Solid fuel rockets, liquid fuel rockets and hybrid fuel rockets are also covered. And lastly, how multiple stages are used to get to space, SpaceX's 2 stage rocket with the Falcon 9 as the first stage being used as the example.
    For info about current events and the near future of human space travel, visit:
    rimstar.org/space
    NOTE: Any comments saying that rockets don't work in space or a vacuum will be deleted and possibly the commenter will be banned with the assumption that the commenter is trolling.
    3D computer generated animation done using Blender 2.59.
    Follow me on Twitter:
    #!/RimStarz
    rimstar.org
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 390

  • @RimstarOrg
    @RimstarOrg  11 років тому +8

    Whenever I think of orbiting as always falling I can't help but think of that Douglas Adams' quote "Flying is learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss." I guess orbiting is the same thing. :)
    I'm glad you liked the video. Thanks.

  • @doltyable
    @doltyable 7 років тому +26

    Excellent explanation. Came here after Elon's Interview where he explained forward speed and gravitational pull. Thank you!

  • @RimstarOrg
    @RimstarOrg  12 років тому +3

    Thanks! They're a lot of fun to make. Greetings back from a ball's throw over the horizon in Canada!

  • @RimstarOrg
    @RimstarOrg  12 років тому +5

    In addition to my previous reply, I just learned that SpaceX's Falcon 2nd stage has an additional small rocket nozzle for roll control.

  • @RimstarOrg
    @RimstarOrg  12 років тому +3

    Thanks! Next time I'll need to make more 3D models and will likely need to master new effects. Oh well, that's whats needed when you push the envelope. The result's worth it though.

  • @RimstarOrg
    @RimstarOrg  11 років тому +2

    Ah, thanks for clarifying. The "cap" on a rocket is the fuel that is ignited and flies out the back. It actually tries to move equally in every direction inside the rocket but there's only one hole, out the back. So the uneven forces result in propulsion, as you say, newton's 3rd law.

  • @RimstarOrg
    @RimstarOrg  11 років тому +1

    Thanks. Finding a way to explain it simply enough was the tricky part.

  • @Radii_DC
    @Radii_DC 8 років тому +11

    The precision required to send humans to the Moon is just staggering, just think about it, a couple of miles per hour off and you're just going to miss it. And the bravery involved, oh... What a great achievement for humanity!

    • @davyspilani1231
      @davyspilani1231 6 років тому +1

      Diyan Boyanof They were very good actors.. And we've never been to the moon.. It's a contradiction of physics.. its the old alli barbar levitation trick that goes back to Babylon.. If you grab your self by the hair and pull why don't you have motion?? Because there is no opposite reaction that is why.. The rocket is exactly the same,, nothing in a vacuum can react because there is nothing there.. So you will not have motion.

    • @Rebbyrag
      @Rebbyrag 6 років тому

      Conservation of linear momentum. If you grab yourself by the hair there is ALWAYS reaction forces. If you pull up on your hair, your hair follicle pulls down an equal amount. You don't move up, because all of the Newtons of force upward are cancelled out by Newtons of force downwards.
      If you're ice skating and push your partner forward, YOU GO BACKWARDS ALSO, you don't need air to move.

    • @davyspilani1231
      @davyspilani1231 6 років тому

      Josh Garber Exactly,, if you push someone when ice skating you both move right?? As you just said,, so the pushing was the action and you and the one you pushed were the reactions,, one 1 way and the other the oppersite way... What's the opposite reaction to the rocket? the explosion is the action and the rocket is 1 reaction but where is the opposite reaction.. Hey if you didn't need it Newton wouldn't have mentioned it would he! Now try ice skating and push nothing and see if you move forward!! This is exactly like a rocket in space,, push as much as you like nothing will happen..

    • @Rebbyrag
      @Rebbyrag 6 років тому +3

      the rocket is pushing the exhaust!!! mass goes backwards, mass goes forwards!!
      If you are holding heavy textbooks while skating and throw them backwards you will go forwards! The rockets are literally throwing tons of material backwards at ultra high velocities. You don't need another person. you just need to throw your clothes, or throw anything.
      The explosion is the action and it pushes on the rocket and the rocket pushes on it - thats why there's massive streams of fire behind rockets - they're throwing material backwards at high velocities, while throwing, there is a reaction force pushing the rocket upwards

    • @bachtran1577
      @bachtran1577 6 років тому +2

      Rockets work in space because of action and reaction. Mass in the form of exhaust gas is forced out the nozzle and allows the rocket to move forward.
      The law of conservation of momentum means that if you have gases with a negative momentum, the rocket must have an equivalent positive momentum so that total momentum with the center of mass as the reference frame is zero.
      Therefore, rockets will indeed work in space, and will actually produce greater force than within the atmosphere.

  • @RimstarOrg
    @RimstarOrg  11 років тому

    Thanks. Getting the orbiting explanation clear took a lot of thought and a few versions. Glad to hear it works.

  • @RimstarOrg
    @RimstarOrg  11 років тому +1

    LOL! You're right! I hadn't thought of that before! Right down to the use of brass, copper and the mechanical aspect.

  • @RimstarOrg
    @RimstarOrg  11 років тому +3

    Yes, absolutely. That's why I said in the lower atmosphere some fuel still burns outside where there's oxygen. I guess lower atmosphere might not sound like the launch pad too but I meant it in my mind :).

  • @suryadutt
    @suryadutt 6 років тому +2

    Wow.. one of the best explanations ever for such a complicated topic. Thank you.

  • @caderaid100
    @caderaid100 10 років тому +33

    Great video! 10 minutes of information packed in 5! : )

    • @JacobDalgaard
      @JacobDalgaard 10 років тому

      Best comment among youtube comments...

  • @RimstarOrg
    @RimstarOrg  11 років тому +1

    You're welcome! I'm glad it was clear. Thanks for letting me know.

  • @RimstarOrg
    @RimstarOrg  11 років тому

    Cool! Glad I could clear it up for you. Thanks for letting me know.

  • @RimstarOrg
    @RimstarOrg  11 років тому

    Thanks. And thanks for the feedback.

  • @happytoilet1
    @happytoilet1 10 років тому

    thank you for uploading all those great video

  • @RimstarOrg
    @RimstarOrg  11 років тому

    Glad you like my vids. And welcome. Hopefully I can keep coming up with more cool ones.

  • @RimstarOrg
    @RimstarOrg  11 років тому

    Glad you liked it. What a great idea for a video! But for now, they used the rocket in the top part of the lunar lander to ascend from the moon's surface to the moon's orbit. There they transferred to the waiting command module (part of the spaceship they used to get to the moon.) They used that to return to Earth orbit. Then used part of that, the capsule, to slow down by pushing against the Earth's thick atmosphere. And finally parachutes to splashdown in the ocean.

  • @RimstarOrg
    @RimstarOrg  11 років тому

    Thanks! And thanks for letting me know.

  • @earlenecruz4598
    @earlenecruz4598 4 роки тому

    I very much appreciated this concise and comprehensive explanation after watching the launch today. Thank you!

  • @revelation2261
    @revelation2261 4 роки тому +1

    Excellent explanation,thank you

  • @RimstarOrg
    @RimstarOrg  11 років тому

    The launch pad is the place the rocket is located when it takes off from the ground; the place with the fireproofed support structures you mentioned.
    Most of the fuel burns inside the combustion chamber, some outside.
    I don't have any other rocket videos yet. I have plans to do more, but my todo list is long. I'm hoping sometime during the first few months of 2013.

  • @RimstarOrg
    @RimstarOrg  11 років тому

    You're welcome! Glad you liked it. Welcome to my channel.

  • @RimstarOrg
    @RimstarOrg  10 років тому

    I'm pretty sure in the case of the grasshopper, the rocket nozzle (the cone at the bottom) is on a gimbal. That means it can be pointed in different directions. I'm less sure if they also vary the thrust.

  • @RimstarOrg
    @RimstarOrg  11 років тому

    You're welcome. I'm glad you liked it. And thanks for watching.

  • @Andre-md1oh
    @Andre-md1oh 6 років тому

    Thank you so much good sir. Im preparing a project and presentation about space x and I wasnt aware what those two stages were. Thanks!

  • @abdullah78m
    @abdullah78m 10 років тому

    Thanks for the video. Well explained and to the point. A definite thumbs up!! 👍

  • @angelsRsinging
    @angelsRsinging 8 років тому

    Thanks that made a lot of sense and was easy to understand. I always wondered how it worked.

  • @Ya-average-11B
    @Ya-average-11B 6 років тому

    Great video man!!

  • @RimstarOrg
    @RimstarOrg  11 років тому

    Then please clarify your question. I must have misunderstood it. Or did I really answer it perfectly?

  • @42tabriz
    @42tabriz 11 років тому

    thanks very much rimstrag

  • @emptyglo
    @emptyglo 10 років тому

    What a great instructional video, congrats to you

  • @inabsentiamay
    @inabsentiamay 12 років тому

    I really love your videos! Never stop making this awesome and educational videos, please! Greetings from Spain!

  • @TheOnlyGags
    @TheOnlyGags 11 років тому

    Thanks for the reply..
    Your videos are really interesting.

  • @VivekYadav-qz4fy
    @VivekYadav-qz4fy 3 роки тому

    Great video let me watch again ..

  • @MichaelPomeroyinmauritania
    @MichaelPomeroyinmauritania 6 років тому

    Fantastic. More vids about SpaceX please!

  • @phexid
    @phexid 12 років тому

    Great video, very well done RimStarOrg! Keep up the informational videos...loved the graphics too...hard work pays off! Next time it might not take as long, now that you are into the swing of things. Liked :)

  • @RimstarOrg
    @RimstarOrg  11 років тому

    Different rockets have different numbers of stages depending on their purpose. SpaceX's Falcon 9 has 3 stages. The 1st gets it off the ground but doesn't get to orbital velocity. The 2nd gets to orbital velocity. The 3rd is the Dragon capsule and its trunk for carrying extra cargo. For a rocket sending a satellite to geosynchronous orbit, the 3rd stage is another rocket for sending the satellite (4th stage) to GEO.

  • @Deep_science_sorts
    @Deep_science_sorts 9 років тому

    amazing presentation! thumbs up dud......subscribed for your work.

  • @keraman2
    @keraman2 11 років тому

    Thanks Rim...that was very educational....ur subscribed!!

  • @rubisasikumar472
    @rubisasikumar472 4 роки тому +2

    Thx very clearly explained

  • @communistjesus
    @communistjesus 11 років тому

    Great explanation.. Thank you..

  • @RimstarOrg
    @RimstarOrg  11 років тому +2

    Ah, so that's what he meant by "cap"! Sure, if the tanks were just big containers with open holes in one end but they're not. There are valves and pumps that prevent that. The release of fuel and oxidizer into the combustion chamber is very controlled.
    Funny how I couldn't figure out what he meant by "cap". I guess it's so far from being an issue that I couldn't see his meaning. Maybe if he hadn't started by referring to my spring rocket's reaction mass as a "cap" then I would have understood.

  • @saibharath4617
    @saibharath4617 5 років тому

    I loved the way of explaining with illustration,Great job 👍

  • @RimstarOrg
    @RimstarOrg  10 років тому

    They're working on it. Search "grasshopper spacex" for their progress on making the 1st and 2nd stage Falcon rockets land. As for the Dragon, yes, that's been their plan all along, though they haven't done it yet.

  • @RimstarOrg
    @RimstarOrg  12 років тому

    Thanks!

  • @RimstarOrg
    @RimstarOrg  11 років тому

    I've looked a bunch of videos of the kerbal space program and it looks like a lot of fun, not goofy at all!

  • @AbiNubli
    @AbiNubli 10 років тому

    i mean to correct the course and stabilize it. such a rocket science. thx for the answer.

  • @SondreBKrogh
    @SondreBKrogh 11 років тому

    Awesome video!

  • @FillingTheGap1
    @FillingTheGap1 11 років тому

    very good video, orbiting finally 'clicked' in my head.

  • @mariepitts8495
    @mariepitts8495 9 років тому +2

    Thank you for posting this video. It was very accessible and informative.

  • @saikrishnaenjapuri7677
    @saikrishnaenjapuri7677 4 роки тому

    Very well explained

  • @taylorpederson6891
    @taylorpederson6891 9 років тому

    very good video thank you

  • @gianb3952
    @gianb3952 6 років тому

    Great video, informative and short. The perfect video to show my family 😂😂

  • @RimstarOrg
    @RimstarOrg  11 років тому

    You can in the case of liquid fuel rockets and hybrid rockets but not solid fuel rockets. See the video starting at 1:17.

  • @gladysrodriguez5498
    @gladysrodriguez5498 6 років тому

    WOW.THANK YOU.MERRY CHRISTMAS!

    • @RimstarOrg
      @RimstarOrg  6 років тому

      You're welcome! And Merry Christmas to you too!

  • @brendanberg9523
    @brendanberg9523 6 років тому +38

    Drops 1st stage into ocean? Laughs in 2017 (-:

    • @RimstarOrg
      @RimstarOrg  6 років тому +12

      Yeah, darn SpaceX! :) I guess it's at the point where I'll have to update it.

    • @xxCrimsonSpiritxx
      @xxCrimsonSpiritxx 5 років тому +1

      Why where do they drop it now?

    • @shubhamsarkar9680
      @shubhamsarkar9680 5 років тому +4

      @@xxCrimsonSpiritxx
      😅
      Search UA-cam..
      Falcon 1 stage landing..

    • @theenjeneer2493
      @theenjeneer2493 4 роки тому +2

      xxCrimsonSpiritxx they land it BOI

    • @theenjeneer2493
      @theenjeneer2493 4 роки тому +1

      shubham sarkar falcon 9 stage landing

  • @lakkojurameshbabu9523
    @lakkojurameshbabu9523 4 роки тому

    very nice explanation

  • @RimstarOrg
    @RimstarOrg  11 років тому

    Which stuff do you mean? Rockets?

  • @RimstarOrg
    @RimstarOrg  12 років тому

    The first and second stages are able to tilt the rocket nozzles themselves.

  • @ahmedhared7979
    @ahmedhared7979 4 роки тому

    good explanation for rocket thanks and proceed to other detail in rocket

  • @RimstarOrg
    @RimstarOrg  11 років тому

    Separation methods vary. On some rockets there are bolts that explode to break them apart. On SpaceX's rocket they use pneumatics, basically a means of physically pushing the rockets apart which is more reliable than explosive bolts.

  • @BhaskararaoNakkaeee
    @BhaskararaoNakkaeee 5 років тому

    Could you please explain mechanism of separation of booster and stage separation

  • @ivantonev5794
    @ivantonev5794 3 роки тому

    Man, you are awesome.

  • @solonera65
    @solonera65 10 років тому

    Great video

  • @richamahajan5132
    @richamahajan5132 9 років тому

    Awsome video..

  • @AbiNubli
    @AbiNubli 10 років тому

    the spacex's grasshoper. what is the propellant type? how it can go back landed safely on earth?

  • @RimstarOrg
    @RimstarOrg  11 років тому

    It would help.

  • @RimstarOrg
    @RimstarOrg  11 років тому

    I'm being very nice and trying hard to understand and answer your questions. Please be polite. I tried a few approaches to your first question since I wasn't sure what you were asking. If you don't believe rockets fly in space then there's little I can say to help you.
    Pushing on yourself is not the same as exploding fuel inside a combustion chamber and letting the fuel fly out in one direction only. I didn't show that part in my video. How a rocket engine works is on my todo list.

  • @lmogden1
    @lmogden1 12 років тому

    great video

  • @abrief1
    @abrief1 9 років тому

    Awesome video!!! Paul Dattner sent me here to check our your videos :) I'm glad he did!!

    • @RimstarOrg
      @RimstarOrg  9 років тому

      abrief1 I'm glad you like it! Welcome! Make sure to thank Paul by clicking on the Like/Favorite button on whatever social media he posted my video from.

    • @abrief1
      @abrief1 9 років тому

      +RimstarOrg thx for responding :) . I liked the button on Paul's FB :) He's my Uncle :)

  • @chargersina
    @chargersina 3 роки тому

    Thank you very much, I will use it in class. I just wish you had mentioned the 2nd law, That every time a stage drops the rocket accelerates but I appreciate your work, well done thanks.

  • @karthikeyagupta8
    @karthikeyagupta8 6 років тому

    good explanation

  • @RimstarOrg
    @RimstarOrg  11 років тому

    It does sounds like fun. Maybe I will. Just went to their website and I see what you mean. They have a video named "Recovered Munar Footage"! :D

  • @RimstarOrg
    @RimstarOrg  12 років тому

    I don't know what the metal is. Some nozzles are designed to slowly wear away (get thinner) during the flight but they last long enough. This is also called ablating. Many other nozzles have tubes around them. The cold propellant runs through these tubes before being burned. While it is running through the tubes, it keeps the nozzles cool.

  • @RimstarOrg
    @RimstarOrg  11 років тому

    I need a diagram to explain it and unfortunately it'll be a while before I can do a video about it. See this video watch?v=C-EIIFHaXkY
    or search youtube for "How a rocket works" and look at the video "How to work rockets.wmv". See 0:33 into the video to see the unbalanced forces on the combustion chamber that produce thrust.
    And spacecraft do course corrections far from Earth using rockets, ion thrusters on long distance craft also run far from Earth, and command modules returned from the moon.

  • @RimstarOrg
    @RimstarOrg  10 років тому

    The grasshopper uses RP-1, a highly refined kerosene fuel, and liquid oxygen (LOX) as the oxidizer. I'm not sure what you're asking by how it can go back landed safely on Earth. It has landing legs.

  • @bizzo918
    @bizzo918 5 років тому

    Nice idea thanks

  • @crafter2u
    @crafter2u 11 років тому

    im wondering if once you ignight the fuel can you turn the igniter off?

  • @Mr0Whitey
    @Mr0Whitey 9 років тому

    excellent work! though i already knew most of it i found this trying to find out how solid fuel boosters work. and boy i did;) the depiction of the iss is a bit unscaly though and might throw a false image

  • @RimstarOrg
    @RimstarOrg  11 років тому +1

    Well, I couldn't say everything in the video :). But the latitude difference is a good point. Too bad our state of technology is such that something like that is an important factor.

    • @hata6290
      @hata6290 4 роки тому

      Holy shit this is 8 years ago, nice job man

  • @8897554546
    @8897554546 11 років тому

    i want to know the 4 stages of rocket vehicle & how propolents will separate from first to 4 stage

  • @RimstarOrg
    @RimstarOrg  11 років тому

    Good question. Bigelow has an agreement with SpaceX to use their Falcon 9 rocket, the one in this video, for sending crew and customers to and from their space stations. At first it seemed SpaceX would handle only Bigelow's non-US customers but newer news makes it unclear if they'll be serving US customers too. As for what will be used to send Bigelow's space station itself, I've only ever seen a video of the Atlas V or Delta IV (not sure which) being used. Too soon to say probably.

  • @navodadesilva
    @navodadesilva 11 років тому

    I like your videos

  • @ghartran31
    @ghartran31 9 років тому

    Outstanding video. You summarized something difficult for my students to understand in 5 minutes!

  • @alvarohernandez2764
    @alvarohernandez2764 8 років тому +3

    Ok you said that to go to the moon, a faster than orbit launch is needed, but an article i read about apollo mission, mentioned some braking orbit action, this is what I'm trying to understand, how was this push possible, how was control even made possible when moonlanding, if there is no steering, how can they talk about braking moon's orbit? And how was velocity manipulation achieved to land(if the moon is land) the craft? There is no air, so that means no fan, nor jet should work, right?

    • @RimstarOrg
      @RimstarOrg  8 років тому

      I assume the braking orbit action you're saying you read about was breaking near the moon to orbit the moon? If so, I don't understand your question. They used rockets to brake and to steer.

    • @alvarohernandez2764
      @alvarohernandez2764 8 років тому +1

      RimstarOrg oh they did? Well i think that aswers part of my questions. Was it liquid fuel that they used in space or what? Here's what i really want to know. How should the absence of air and oxygen in the vacuum affect the outcome of rockets in comparison to an aired environment like earth? Is it even possible to create fire in a vacuum?

    • @RimstarOrg
      @RimstarOrg  8 років тому +2

      They used liquid fuels. Burning the fuel does require oxygen, so they carry it along. That's why you read of rockets carrying liquid oxygen or other oxidizers (molecules containing oxygen.) Search for the word "fuel" on the following pages:
      en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saturn_V
      en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_Command/Service_Module
      en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_Lunar_Module
      The last two above talk about the use of nitrogen tetroxide (N2O4) as the oxidizer:
      en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dinitrogen_tetroxide
      On the Lunar Module page above (the lander) they say that for the RCS, DPS, APS (Reaction, Descent and Ascent Propulsion Systems) all used Aerozine 50 fuel / nitrogen tetroxide oxidizer.
      Even when launching from the surface of the Earth they're using the liquid oxygen from their tanks.

    • @alvarohernandez2764
      @alvarohernandez2764 8 років тому

      RimstarOrg ok thanks for the info

    • @taytheprodigy4388
      @taytheprodigy4388 7 років тому

      Alvaro Hernandez,youre right, no fans, no jets BUT, rockets don't need air to work, they use combustion

  • @Ferelmakina
    @Ferelmakina 8 років тому

    +RimstarOrg Thanks for the explanation. What is the solid fuel used by spacex or nasa?

    • @RimstarOrg
      @RimstarOrg  8 років тому

      +Fernando Romera SpaceX uses only liquid fueled rockets. You can see what the space shuttle used for it's two solid rocket boosters here (too long to list) en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_Shuttle_Solid_Rocket_Booster#Propellant. The Atlas V rocket is a Lockheed Martin-Boeing rocket that NASA sometimes uses and it sometimes uses strap-on boosters for added thrust and you can see what it uses here en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AJ-60A.

  • @ifoxrider
    @ifoxrider 11 років тому

    3:21 good throw you got right there. Does it hit any bird or reach to the moon?

  • @RimstarOrg
    @RimstarOrg  11 років тому

    (... continued)
    If you're okay with small payloads then interplanetary spacecraft have already done it using ion thruster engines.
    If you want human travel then use the same trick but with more energy. That's where nuclear power running the VASIMIR electro-magnetic thruster will hopefully work out.

  • @redcartiers
    @redcartiers 5 років тому +2

    Thanks for explaining. I think I know what I wanna go to college for...

    • @person5550
      @person5550 3 роки тому

      spacex doesn't care about collage degrees

  • @RimstarOrg
    @RimstarOrg  11 років тому

    Nothing is needed to react against except the fuel reacting with the rocket. In fact, the better the vacuum the better it works since there's less to slow you down. See 0:24 in the video.
    If running out of fuel is what you're worried about, you're right. A partial solution is this... You can either throw out a lot of fuel at a time or you can throw out less fuel at a higher velocity. That way your fuel will last longer and you'll accelerate just as fast.
    (continued...)

  • @buraqaerospace9945
    @buraqaerospace9945 3 роки тому

    This video was actually very good 🐱

  • @daothuhuong8857
    @daothuhuong8857 7 років тому

    great !!!

  • @FreedomFighterEx
    @FreedomFighterEx 11 років тому

    you should try a demo, demo have enough item just to messing around orbit and go to the mun (name of moon in KSP)
    also, exploding stuff everywhere.

  • @crafter2u
    @crafter2u 11 років тому

    what keeps the liquid fuel burning?

  • @RimstarOrg
    @RimstarOrg  11 років тому

    And it is possible to achieve very high speed by continuous propulsion in space... but the problem get getting the continuous propulsion. The material that gets expelled from the rocket during the explosion will eventually run out. Ion rockets, which don't use an explosion, but still expel matter can run for a longer time but don't create as strong a force and take a while to get up to speed. I'm working on a a water bottle rocket video this week that goes into the science a little more.

  • @69Solo
    @69Solo 9 років тому

    Liked and subscribed. XD

  • @skipsassy1
    @skipsassy1 10 років тому

    Question:
    How come we don't just add a rocket to a spacecraft/voyager to increase it's speed after it reaches orbital escape velocity? In other words, why does the Voyager only go 35K miles per hour, when giving it a bigger push, say a burn of to reach 1,000,000 mph? thereby reaching for example the Bowline of the Sun's radiation sphere much faster than 30 years? Or visit the gas planets much faster? Or is it that the spacecraft would miss the orbital gravity of the target planets ? Excellent

  • @RimstarOrg
    @RimstarOrg  11 років тому

    A rocket doesn't push against the air to move. So yes, rockets work fine in space. Satellites adjust their location this way, Mars rockets make course corrections, ... Create an explosion in a closed container and the pressure on the container is equal in all directions. Make a hole in one end and the pressure is no longer present an that end, so the rocket goes in the other direction. Stop the rocket by turning it around and doing the same in the other direction.