is this finally worth rushing it?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 26 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 134

  • @Linksi
    @Linksi  2 роки тому +76

    So lads, I made a mistake. Saw the landmarks and got excited to see they at least added landmarks, because i didn't remember the landmarks used to be the same. The reality is, the region is not worth rushing, it has been heavily nerfed with no real incentive apart from removing the massive debuff for Belegar which is like removing a brace to be able to walk properly. So yea massively nerfed cause no space to build shit.
    When I make a mistake ill own it. No buff just Nerf!

    • @Azkaellon9001
      @Azkaellon9001 2 роки тому +4

      Very very rare to see someone up and admit to a mistake/learn from reading what other people have to say. Big respect. You've earnt yourself a get out of jail free card for the next time we come a' grudging!
      Looking forward to the new video, a good bit of dwarven grumbling is always a pleasure for us longbeards

    • @Linksi
      @Linksi  2 роки тому +1

      @@Azkaellon9001 everyone makes mistakes it stupid when people don't admit to them, that means you arent willing to learn and understand better, again its a question of having checked the wrong thing and rushed to finish something but that's my fault ill try to do better but I know I will still fuck up. Really appreciate your message my dude!

    • @Azkaellon9001
      @Azkaellon9001 2 роки тому +1

      @@Linksi Fuck-ups are always understandable and forgivable, the difference comes when people deny deny deny and that's how the War of the Beard/Great War began 😁 If those selfish, repugnant elgi were to have come off their high horses and admitted that some of their dudes had gone rogue and asked for help rather than cutting the beard off our ambassador and denying the raid every happened then we would have had the strongest coalition in the old world, preventing the uprise of the Dark Elves and the fortifying of Chaos! To admit to a mistake makes you stronger than Phoenix King Caledor II, the strongest of the smug elgi!

    • @carlvallin7969
      @carlvallin7969 2 роки тому

      I think the Landmarks were always there as well. Certainly were in Warhammer 2, at least for Belegar and Skarsnik.

  • @praise_kek340
    @praise_kek340 2 роки тому +295

    Ngl i wish it was 4 settlements with eight peaks being 10 slots. If they want less settlements make it like skavenblight and the the old wood elf forest

    • @Linksi
      @Linksi  2 роки тому +25

      Tbh had the same reaction but then realised its still extremely strong and makes a ridiculous volume of money compared to before

    • @stevenschafer7778
      @stevenschafer7778 2 роки тому +33

      I don't like that it has 8 slots now instead of 10 in mortal empires
      and only 2 regions.
      I'm probably not going to play Queek, Skarsnik nor Belegar before they fix this

    • @goldensp3038
      @goldensp3038 2 роки тому +21

      @@Linksi It IS much worse at least for dwarfs now that it's two settlement city, Underway Junction doesn't give passive income like it does for Skaven and it just scales income from other buildings in the province, with 2 cities it's much worse for dwarfs ( Underway Junction is available for all dwarf factions ). As for unique building for belegar, I suspect it will get even less play now, useful mostly for Control and Corruption.

    • @praise_kek340
      @praise_kek340 2 роки тому +5

      @@Linksi its not about the money it the grandeur epically for the dwarves

    • @penedulumskateco7691
      @penedulumskateco7691 2 роки тому +4

      Never understood CAs less is more approach to things. Dumbing down and removing mechanics and making things less intricate .... Gotta say it's something that I've always let get to me more than I probably should. Almost seems intentional to get the players to start buzz online talking about it and then sell the fix later in a patch/dlc

  • @Azkaellon9001
    @Azkaellon9001 2 роки тому +184

    this... just looks worthless for Dorfs. As a huge fan of Belegar since I was little, I'm disappointed. This actually looks like a nerf since they lost 2 minor settlements for the income % increase to apply to...
    Why does Queek get so much more than us? that makes no sense

    • @Linksi
      @Linksi  2 роки тому +7

      He did get stronger i believe gonna try and get his starting video Guide tomorrow

    • @Azkaellon9001
      @Azkaellon9001 2 роки тому +48

      @@Linksi It's more infuriating given Queek doesn't have a negative modifier for NOT having eight peaks, and if you look at Skarsnik, he's a goblin leader so I consider eight peaks to be a straight buff if he gets to recruit orks from there. Belegar is the only one who gets nerfed when he doesn't control eight peaks. Furthermore, both Skarsnik and Queek are really cool characters regardless, whereas Belegar and his entire faction are entirely, 100% about Eight Peaks and nothing more. It not only makes no sense for Dwarves to have the weakest Karak Eight Peaks but it's drastically imbalanced when Dwarves also have a nerf when they don't control it. I hope some serious changes are made to fix Belegar rather than having two less important characters to Eight Peaks have the most important bonuses regarding it.

    • @Kfo221
      @Kfo221 2 роки тому +2

      @@Azkaellon9001 man, you are really upset about this. If only there was a way you could change this yourself...like some kind of mod or something....if only..

    • @Azkaellon9001
      @Azkaellon9001 2 роки тому +17

      @@Kfo221 Meh, I'm just a salty bastard. Mods are the lifeline of whiii, personally so far all I've seen has just made me decide to stick with whii until they fix whiii to the point it's worth picking over ii. Praise be to our modder overlords

    • @ASingleSpaghetti
      @ASingleSpaghetti 2 роки тому +35

      @@Kfo221 He shouldn't have to go in and fix something that the developers should've considered themselves. It's a perfectly legitimate complaint.

  • @axellenhart7890
    @axellenhart7890 2 роки тому +23

    Every Belegar/Dawi fan after seeing the changes: *THIS IS GOING INTO THE FUCKING BOOK*

    • @Linksi
      @Linksi  2 роки тому +1

      hahahaha so many books have been filled

  • @SpiceCh
    @SpiceCh 2 роки тому +12

    The fact that Eight Peaks is more valuable to the Skaven and Greenskins than the dwarves is the greatest of insults. Disregarding the removal of the continuously insane 50 % upkeep debuff for Belegar's faction, 10 % trade tariffs and 5 % ironbreaker upkeep is worth less than a gold mine, and the local bonuses to defense doesn't matter in the grand scheme of things.
    The insult is doubly grievous by virtue of Belegar being much further away from Eight Peaks and with a much higher penalty for not having owning the settlement than Queek and Skarsnik.

    • @Azkaellon9001
      @Azkaellon9001 2 роки тому +4

      A Grudge has been added to the book this day

    • @Linksi
      @Linksi  2 роки тому +1

      kill all of them

  • @noriantiri9310
    @noriantiri9310 2 роки тому +85

    The buildings didn't get changed that much. And Karak height peaks is still really lackluster for Clan Amgrund to take. The ancestral tombs building chain should have at least some global bonuses, but instead the only major bonus is the loss of the +50% upkeep. Clan Amgrund should be more powerfull than your average dwarf faction after they take the height peaks but they are not

    • @Linksi
      @Linksi  2 роки тому +1

      They do provide some insane Buffs, all the units having magical damage is nits

    • @Janir98
      @Janir98 2 роки тому +22

      @@Linksi That isnt global though, just in the province and adjacent provinces, which is nice and makes it easier to defend, but thats that

    • @Linksi
      @Linksi  2 роки тому +3

      Agreed it should be global

    • @ShadowWalker-ng1it
      @ShadowWalker-ng1it 2 роки тому +3

      @@Janir98 Would be nice if taking the 8 peaks saw getting constently attacked by the other at least but no 8 peaks is one of the safest province the ai never gets to attack there and the ai race faction ignore the race for the most sometimes stumbling into capturing the city

    • @svenbrede6151
      @svenbrede6151 2 роки тому +2

      @@Linksi Look Linksi, Karak Eight Peaks used to provide a buff for Belegar once captured called 'an oath fullfilled' this provided +4 lord recruit rank, +100xp per turn all armies and +4 public order all regions. Current Eight Peaks is... Surprisingly lackluster Magical weapons at t5 sounds nice... But when you get this to t5, you're likely gonna control the adjacent regions anyway
      The buff broke with the grudge system rework. RIP Belegar

  • @monsieurm3989
    @monsieurm3989 2 роки тому +14

    Yeah landmarks whatever they seem the same and but reducing construction slots and taking away two settlements is still very upsetting. At this point it would be better as a skavenblight counterpart with 12 construction slots and no other settlements

    • @Linksi
      @Linksi  2 роки тому

      Skavenblight got a slight nerf as well

  • @xXRauLXx2010
    @xXRauLXx2010 2 роки тому +17

    skaven one is busted... why do they get more income then dwarves...

    • @Linksi
      @Linksi  2 роки тому +1

      Cause ratties? No idea tbh

    • @Arbaaltheundefeated
      @Arbaaltheundefeated 2 роки тому +11

      Because CA loves Skaven and hates Dwarves, that much has been obvious for a long time.

  • @Pitrah
    @Pitrah 2 роки тому +12

    Clan Angrund only getting magical weapon attacks when in the same or neighboring province seems.. really bad no? I don't think players are going to stick to the dwarven holds for the entire campaign

    • @darthplagueis13
      @darthplagueis13 2 роки тому +3

      It really should be global. That way, Clan Angrund would massively benefit when fighting daemons.

    • @Linksi
      @Linksi  2 роки тому

      thats true

    • @DutchGuyMike
      @DutchGuyMike 2 роки тому

      Creative Assembly has looked at the data and found that most players do not leave the regions surrounding the starting area (conquering wise), it is only a smaller percentage that actually ends up conquering half or most of the world.

    • @Pitrah
      @Pitrah 2 роки тому +1

      @@DutchGuyMike I mean what data do you even quote here? Where has this been posted?
      And does that data indicate that people don't conquer the entire world or does it indicate that few finishes their conquest campaigns? I'm pretty sure it's the latter moreso than the first. Either way, Clan Angrund in particular is a very stretched out campaign with lots of fights far away from Eight Peaks, they don't get much value at all from magical weaponry. The best targets for that kind of weapons is also generally speaking the undead or demons, neither of which will be found near Eight Peaks so it's largely wasted.

    • @DutchGuyMike
      @DutchGuyMike 2 роки тому +1

      @@Pitrah It is what developers themselves said in the stream/video where Warhammer 3 questions are being asked and what ideas for Immortal Empires were going around.

  • @zonolith5912
    @zonolith5912 2 роки тому +7

    Major benefit, for the dwarfs specifically, is just getting normal upkeep again, 50% increase until you capture K8P is annoying, but thematic if nothing else.
    Skarsnik got shafted though, he gets orcs, but by the time you get to K8Ps you have so many benefits for gobbos the orcs won't really help you, imo at least.

  • @semipork
    @semipork 2 роки тому +3

    Like many have said losing many slots (from both 8 peaks itself but two smaller cities is a lot to lose. A lot less ability to build and something miner but I always enjoyed is having wood at one of the settlements. It was mostly good for Belegar cuz it increases the level of rangers recruited in that province but that was enough for me to always build it

    • @Linksi
      @Linksi  2 роки тому

      I think it will push for more desicions in terms of what to build ect, what im worried about it might have been swung to far in one direction

  • @mj91212
    @mj91212 2 роки тому +3

    Goodness, fewer regions, AND fewer build slots? Dang, why even bother at this point?

  • @ZetsubouGintama
    @ZetsubouGintama 2 роки тому +11

    Funny as I playing Settra in ME and one of Nagash book was also at 8 peaks.

  • @teenageanarchist861
    @teenageanarchist861 2 роки тому +6

    Did they finally fix the moving of your capital if you conquer 8 peaks?

    • @Linksi
      @Linksi  2 роки тому +7

      Sadly no

  • @kolpere1625
    @kolpere1625 2 роки тому +3

    is so hard to do the fucking following??:
    -Adding a new resource: silver (money+ untainted, and maybe more runesmith rank), to 8P. 8P is the queen of silver ffs!.
    -Better map reorganization to make the province harder to invade excepting you are any faction with underway movement stance.
    -10 slots! you hear me? 10 slots!
    -better global growth from landmark, +5 growth is shitty, at least +30, and remove pasture (not everything would be a buff btw). This is the heart of the dwarf empire, is the core of all trading (like rome as the heart of civilization and progress). Its pretty obvious to have a good boost to make other karaks grow faster, because line supplies are stronk again, right?
    -The vault is the same as in wh2, i think they should make other buffs to compensate this.
    And i think thats all.

    • @Linksi
      @Linksi  2 роки тому

      This is a really good suggestions!

  • @Asraeks
    @Asraeks 2 роки тому +17

    Why does it have less building slots than before?

    • @Linksi
      @Linksi  2 роки тому +2

      They generally reduced the size heavily for construction for settlements

    • @Asraeks
      @Asraeks 2 роки тому +16

      @@Linksi that's bad. Before, karak 8 peaks province was probably the best province in the game for dwarfs. Now it's like who cares, bunch of landmarks which barely give any substancial global bonus

    • @TheBoxGhost_tm
      @TheBoxGhost_tm 2 роки тому +5

      @@Asraeks Black Crag and Karaz-a-Karak were significantly better than 8 Peaks. Only major advantage 8 Peaks had was growth rates due to having 4 settlements for growth + a pasture building chain for yet more growth so you could hit T5 quickly (for dwarfs at least).

    • @Pos3id0n.
      @Pos3id0n. 2 роки тому +2

      @@TheBoxGhost_tm so their growth rate was fast (for a dwarf)?

    • @Asraeks
      @Asraeks 2 роки тому +1

      @@TheBoxGhost_tm yep that's why it was the best in my opinion. You can always make loads of money elsewhere but unlocking higher tier units is pretty important

  • @ncrranger2281
    @ncrranger2281 2 роки тому +14

    Actually its was originally this size, they buffed it in the lifetime of Mortal Empires at one point, and now for some reason the reversed it. In my opinion this was a bad choice. They should really change that idiotic mantality that they keep since Rome 2, more precisely after Medieval 2, that too many buildings with too little slots. Warhammer I was the worst I think in this regard. Oh and they aslo butchered Nehekhara, they made Numas a small city, what the actuall f*ck CA? Sorry for bad English. Just correct me.

    • @Linksi
      @Linksi  2 роки тому

      they have really nerfed a lot of settlements

    • @ncrranger2281
      @ncrranger2281 2 роки тому

      @@Linksi Unfortunately. I dont understand why is this good.

  • @cheesus7672
    @cheesus7672 2 роки тому +5

    Tarriff linked this video - must nail a problem😁

  • @jordanring9273
    @jordanring9273 2 роки тому +4

    Belegar is my favorite legendary Lord and campaign, and at first glance I'm 90% sure literally nothing changed in either landmark buildings. If so, it's meagre at best. They heavily nerfed Eight Peaks but especially Belegar. If nothing changes, at least lower the crippling upkeep debuff to 25%.

    • @Linksi
      @Linksi  2 роки тому +2

      I triple checked this now cause of this comment and someone else and it hasn't changed I made a mistake to post a second vid. Later today or tomorrow

  • @Siptom369
    @Siptom369 2 роки тому +3

    Playing together as Skarsnik, Belegar and Quick seems like an awesome head to head campaign

  • @danscga2487
    @danscga2487 2 роки тому +4

    now all it need is someone actually attack the Karak so the buffs have some use

    • @Azkaellon9001
      @Azkaellon9001 2 роки тому +2

      Literally, almost all of it is worthless for Dorfs. Lucky Queek I guess, even though they have zero debuffs for not having eight peaks... and they have a perfectly good campaign and thicc lore without Eight Peaks being involved! Makes no sense 🙃

  • @Ratiasu1
    @Ratiasu1 2 роки тому +3

    The Grand Underway Junction is identical to how it was in WH2. So for dwarves, losing 2 slots and 2 regions it's just a nerf. Pretty salty about that.

  • @jacobs2388
    @jacobs2388 2 роки тому +13

    Why is there no more environmental architecture anymore?? In ME there were pyres, and walkways and other things in the mountains around the city, now it's just another generic dwarf hold

    • @alparsoylerkaya32
      @alparsoylerkaya32 2 роки тому +5

      It’s really disappointing right ? And also why do they make it 8 slots when the city is probably one of the biggest in WF lore

    • @raymanmann8132
      @raymanmann8132 2 роки тому +2

      it’s too much to process

    • @Linksi
      @Linksi  2 роки тому +1

      There is, but it develops over time which I legit thought was the coolest shit. but yes I had the same innitial insinct as you when I saw it

    • @jacobs2388
      @jacobs2388 2 роки тому

      @@Linksi Are you able to post the tier 1 vs tier 5 settlement? Or does it develop over a set number of turns rather than settlement tiers

  • @JetR
    @JetR 2 роки тому +12

    It also feels much easier to rush (or did for me)

    • @Linksi
      @Linksi  2 роки тому +8

      I had some Really good runs, but then I had some nightmare ones. (Rushed it around 10 times with all of them combined) but not sure if the region feels weaker or stronger.

    • @JetR
      @JetR 2 роки тому

      @@Linksi I didnt rush but when I got there I just walked in with quite a weak army, I "could" have been lucky ua-cam.com/video/WU5mX4qKpn0/v-deo.html

  • @chungowungo769
    @chungowungo769 2 роки тому +4

    The magical damage buff is kind of meh, since it only affects the local province and the armies in the near vicinity. Also, magical resistance is very easy to get for practically any faction, so it might actually be a detriment.

    • @noahtremblay2676
      @noahtremblay2676 2 роки тому +1

      Doesn't work like that anymore magic resist in now spell resist. Magic attacks are not effected and are only beneficial

    • @chungowungo769
      @chungowungo769 2 роки тому +1

      @@noahtremblay2676 You're right, I totally forgot about that. I suppose it is a buff then, if not an especially good one.

    • @noahtremblay2676
      @noahtremblay2676 2 роки тому +1

      @@chungowungo769 ya it doesn't make your jaw drop still lol

    • @Linksi
      @Linksi  2 роки тому

      its an ok buff at best

  • @smokinggnu6584
    @smokinggnu6584 2 роки тому

    What are the landmarks for other races, like for instance High Elves? I assume it'd be different for those not involved in the whole race thing.

  • @kakaomilch5905
    @kakaomilch5905 2 роки тому +5

    This is not worth it at all for Belegarfor the bonuses, just good to ged rid of the upkeep cost

    • @Linksi
      @Linksi  2 роки тому

      I think the region is a good place for it to benefit

  • @sebyroa4207
    @sebyroa4207 Рік тому

    Do u get special buildings in eight peaks as belegar like it says in campaign description or u can get the same special buildings with any dwarf faction?

  • @josephkush1032
    @josephkush1032 2 роки тому +1

    8 peaks is humongous though, if they want to keep it 8 slots then they can put back the 4 settlements.

  • @artje90
    @artje90 2 роки тому +2

    8 peaks was always worth rushing. beside the faction bonusses the unique building where nice but more mportantly a 10 slot city which is easily defendable. but they nerfed it and made it 8 slots now cause reasons?...

    • @Linksi
      @Linksi  2 роки тому

      They will propably adress it soon i think

    • @artje90
      @artje90 2 роки тому +1

      @@Linksi They activly changed it though. so why would they adress it

  • @generalharness8266
    @generalharness8266 2 роки тому +2

    This is so dumb for dwarfs.
    The Skaven get a -10% upkeep reduction for most of there key units, the Dwarfs get a -5% for one of there units.
    The Skaven get a extra 1000 gold per turn though the buildings the Dwarfs get do nothing for income.
    The Skaven get a extra 15 to sacking any settlement the dwarfs get magic weapons for the units in the province.
    Its dumb how much the dwarfs got shat on in this. Not to mention the dwarfs start the furthest away and are the only one whos entire faction is hurt from it.

    • @Linksi
      @Linksi  2 роки тому

      I have hopes, and a lot of copium that this might change

  • @gilgamesh4710
    @gilgamesh4710 2 роки тому +1

    although i hate the less construction slots, it actually forces the player to sacrifice a building for the other, in immortal empires i build the same buildings and layout everywhere which got boring real fast construction became a hassle but now you gotta think for a bit before throwing down any building, in terms of 8 peaks it should gotten the ancient forest treatment seems fair since in the lore its all greatest hold for the dwarves, special buildings, units, and bonuses for the dwarves are must at 8 peaks

    • @Linksi
      @Linksi  2 роки тому

      Legit what I have been thinking

    • @Vasiliy9hells
      @Vasiliy9hells 2 роки тому

      Why not go even further? Lets have max 1 slot per settlement, each will be super unique and we get to sacrifice even more! Yay!
      I mean, wtf is that logic? Why not implement mechanics that allows you to specialize your provinces like advanced edicts, instean of just deleting player's agency on what and how to build? Why players are defending their lazy ways?

  • @aljrvh
    @aljrvh 2 роки тому +1

    As a massive fan of SFO, I wonder how the team will handle this s(h) ituation.

  • @Tucher97
    @Tucher97 2 роки тому +1

    Karak 8peaks sure wasn't worth to rush for assuming you are not the big 3 fighting for it, but even if you are someone else and you take it, the consequences are pitiful because the dwarf king of couches still field armies with units that should break him financially.

    • @Tucher97
      @Tucher97 2 роки тому

      EDit: Ok I realized I end this comment to shortly, I meant to say that what if you are Kroq gar and you take the mountains and thus goblin Sun tzu and King of couches are forced to pound sand or go to war with you.

  • @Ben_EE
    @Ben_EE 2 роки тому

    Definently gonna need a mod to make belegar playable or to buff 8 peaks for him

  • @Ratich
    @Ratich 2 роки тому +2

    They nerfed the build slots D:

  • @MrPmclh
    @MrPmclh 2 роки тому +2

    Time to make some mod.

    • @Linksi
      @Linksi  2 роки тому

      it will propably be fixed as they are too small

  • @szymonrozanski6938
    @szymonrozanski6938 2 роки тому +4

    So my Belegar campaign is already Ruined. And because they also changed from 4 to 2 settlements even less fun.
    So in general even for other Dwarfs this is absolute garbage.
    Literally Dwarfs recieving nerfs after nerfs or enemy factions recieve such buffs that simply make any Dwarf advantage worthless.

    • @Linksi
      @Linksi  2 роки тому

      His campaign isnt lost trust me got a video coming tomorrow about him

  • @luggy9256
    @luggy9256 2 роки тому +1

    Least it’s still better than the ancient city of Quintex… that landmark is just worthless.

  • @Karina-winsmore
    @Karina-winsmore 2 роки тому +1

    Dwarf one is really weak, what are you talking about? Very weak global bonuses and bonus to defense in local province. Its unchanged from wh2. And dwarves has the highest penalty. And 8 peaks was downgraded in size.

  • @jobvermuyen5382
    @jobvermuyen5382 2 роки тому

    Wait, so is it nerfed or buffed?

    • @Linksi
      @Linksi  2 роки тому

      Both, they reduced space but gave stronger buildings

  • @chase6579
    @chase6579 2 роки тому +1

    Ikit video pls

    • @Linksi
      @Linksi  2 роки тому

      Time take must you my rat friend

  • @LuckyAJC
    @LuckyAJC 2 роки тому

    it's better to rush Black Crag and then take eight peaks

  • @changelingman9687
    @changelingman9687 2 роки тому +2

    "is it finally worth rushing it?"
    You mean you don't rush it out of principal?

    • @Azkaellon9001
      @Azkaellon9001 2 роки тому +1

      The only thing getting rushed is Warhammer iii if this is the quality we get

    • @changelingman9687
      @changelingman9687 2 роки тому +1

      @@Azkaellon9001 applaud CA for the work they have dobe so far. Getting every race on the same map is not a small thing. They will fix up Eight Peeks, give it time

    • @Linksi
      @Linksi  2 роки тому +1

      agreed they will get to it but they take time

    • @Vasiliy9hells
      @Vasiliy9hells 2 роки тому

      @@changelingman9687 Maybe too much applaud is not always good? Judging how the quality is plummeted from the WH2 to WH3 i would rather be critical to them

  • @DzinkyDzink
    @DzinkyDzink 2 роки тому +1

    8 Slots...

    • @Linksi
      @Linksi  2 роки тому

      8 peaks 8 slots i get it now

  • @SuperRedarmy123
    @SuperRedarmy123 2 роки тому +1

    qeek and belegar: laughter at skarsnik

    • @Linksi
      @Linksi  2 роки тому

      He got what he was dishing out

  • @awkwardcultism
    @awkwardcultism 2 роки тому

    Your volume is quite low, I had difficulty hearing you.

    • @Linksi
      @Linksi  2 роки тому

      are you sure? cause its extremely loud for me