Martin Heidegger's "Being and Time" (Part 2/8)

In this episode, I cover chapter two of the introduction to Martin Heidegger's "Being and Time."
Episode Breakdown:
Episode 1: (Introduction) Foreword and Chapter One
Episode 2: (Introduction) Chapter Two
Episode 3: (Part One) Chapters One and Two
Episode 4: (Part One) Chapters Three and Four
Episode 5: (Part One) Chapters Five and Six
Episode 6: (Part Two) Chapters One and Two
Episode 7: (Part Two) Chapters Three and Four
Episode 8: (Part Two) Chapters Five and Six
If you want to support me, you can do that with these links:
Patreon: / theoryandphilosophy
paypal.me/theoryphilosophy
Twitter: @DavidGuignion
IG: @theory_and_philosophy
Podbean: theoretician.p...

[@vvviiixxx8745]

only 5000 likes to cover all of Heidegger's lectures on Kant? brb programming spambots to flood this video.

[@DelandaBaudLacanian]

Thank you David, your deep dive into Being and Time concides with a few other projects out there that is helping me understand Heidegger so I'm following your 8 videos closely. Here are my timestamps for this video:
7:47: Trinity of Being: being, temporality and care
11:10 - historicity (not world history) is the temporal mode of being of Dasein, importance of historicity for human engagement with time and history
14:00 - ungraspability of Kant's noumena vs Heidegger's Dasein
14:38 - Heidegger wants to explore Dasein thru the prism of the everyday mundane, eg hammer, car turn signals
21:16 - Kant ignored the question of being, and failed to account for Dasein as the preliminary ontological analytic of the subjectivity of the subject
24:20 - Heidegger criticizes Kant's perspective on space, time, and the transcendental aesthetic.
32:16 - "phenomena are never appearances, but every appearance is dependent upon phenomena"
39:00 - ontology is possible only as phenomenology
41:50 - We must self-interpret, Dasein is the being concerned with being #2ndDerivative, when we investigate it, we are looking at ourselves as the being concerned with being concerned with being #3rdDerivative
42:22 - phenomenological truth is transcendental, revealing the disclosedness of being and transcending all other beings and determinations.

[@glasses_jacket_shirt_man]

You’re the man. I hope you achieve the success you deserve. I greatly value your content and appreciate your genuine humility

[@korpen2858]

Commenting so this can be pushed to 5000 others 👍

[@joshualivingstone5259]

Interesting to note that those one-word comments are Heidegger's own comments lol super helpful stuff.

[@joshualivingstone5259]

Great episode, btw.

[@lucybell3444]

this is saving me in my grad seminar🙏🏻

[@odysseusjones2413]

A very clear and thoughtful talk about dasein. I am curious though: you seem to suggest that discovery is discovery OF something. As if Kant's noumenal being still haunts interpretation. My understanding is that dasein's potentiality of possibilities exhaust utterly the extent of understanding's reach. The limitation here rests with the ontotheological finitude of a finite metaphysics. As Rorty said, the world is made, not discovered, which is his reading of Heidegger. You thoughts?

[@gavinyoung-philosophy]

Love this series David! I’m curious, why use the Stambaugh translation when it’s a consistent view amongst Heidegger scholars that the MacQuarrie/Robinson translation is far better? I’ve heard some say Stambaugh is more readable, but her rendering of much of Heidegger’s language (particularly his neologisms) is notoriously ineffective.

[@moazelsayed541]

I really love your channel ❤

[@genathing903]

I hope that, more than his lectures on Kant, you cover What is Called Thinking.

[@konbouzikos]

Excellent 🎉

[@leonriker4997]

thank you for this also audio is a bit quiet

[@ComradeDt]

We can still get to 5000 likes