Це відео не доступне.
Перепрошуємо.
Battlefield Sword Fighting Vs Fencing: Hutton's "How to Fight an Uncivilised Enemy"!
Вставка
- Опубліковано 27 лип 2023
- In the age of colonialism there was a clash of technology and cultures on the battlefield. Towards the end of the 19th century authors like Captain Alfred Hutton sought to make swordsmanship more suitable for the battlefield. This mindset would result in the combatives seen in WW1 and WW2. The lesson contained in this video was originally recorded for the Dreynevent, hosted on Dreynschlag Channel: • MATT EASTON - Battlefi...
3 extra videos each month on Patreon, which hugely helps support this channel:
/ scholagladiatoria
Facebook & Twitter updates, info and fun:
/ historicalfencing
/ scholagladiato1
Schola Gladiatoria HEMA - sword fighting classes in the UK:
www.swordfight...
Matt Easton's website & Pinterest:
www.matt-easto...
www.pinterest....
Easton Antique Arms:
www.antique-sw...
I like how we say of Hutton's age that they dismissed everything before them, and basically gave the Middle Ages a bad rep. Meanwhile Hutton is looking at Medieval and Renaissance manuals to become better swordsmen.
Hello, Mr. Easton. A friend of mine directed me towards this particular video of yours, and I appreciate how you show the techniques first in slow motion several times, THEN at the chaotic full-speed several times. (Your method of HOW to educate viewers is as worthwhile as the subject matter.)
Second, at around 08:50 minutes, you said, "In some cases, these things will just HAPPEN over the course of the fight." I agree! There are times in aikido classes where any student might be thinking, "Why are we practicing these elaborate, precise movements in class when IRL the odds of us contorting a chaotic mugger into this configuration is between slim and none when it's all coming at us too fast?"
Some aikido techniques are more akin to: if we practice it enough times over enough years, eventually we recognize in a split-second when the assailant is in the proper position for us to use the technique. If we had scoffed at learning the technique and hadn't practiced it, the opportunities wouldn't be visible or available to us in the middle of a flurry of violence.
Your mentioning of, "In some cases, these things will just HAPPEN over the course of the fight," strongly brought that to mind.
I love it that you guys also used full speed in demonstrations!
Yes, use slower movements and pauses to clearly explain the technique, but also show how it might look in actual use, preferably against a resisting opponent!
You could say they are recognizing that you can't expect your opponent in war to fight you on your terms. Therefore you must adapt how you fight (whether individually or as a whole army) to the war you're in. Not doing this has lost many a war over the course of history.
Annoyingly, the enemy also gets a say in how any battle progresses.
The US military recognized this after Vietnam. The Air Force instituted "Dissimilar Air Combat" training using jets that had performance envelopes closer to Migs. The Army created the incredibly elaborate National Training Center, where an entire military unit was trained to fight according to Soviet doctrine and act as a freestyle opposing force for visiting units.
I'm sure I read/heard somewhere that the British view of the Choora as a chopping/cutting weapon was a form of selection bias. Doctors were treating cut wounds, but not stab wounds and so assumed it was a cutting weapon. However anybody stabbed by a choora was going straight to the burial detail and not being seen or recorded by the Doctors.
It happened before. Survivor's mistake.
Its good that Hutton combined other martial arts with it
Excellent. Great presentation. I love the "practical application" aspect of this. Thank you very much. Top quality demonstration and explanation. Cheers!
This was a great video, there are some rough contemporary spanish sources. A few decades before Hutton but Jaime Merelo y Casademunt's treatise on the saber addresses this topic! In his book he delivers his fundamentals of saber fencing but he goes on to have 3 interesting sections at the end of his treatise. He covers the spanish sword/foil vs saber , he covers the saber vs bayonet, and finally the saber vs short weapons mentioning the Spanish experiences in North Africa and the Philippine Archipelago. He has a series of rules he lays out and mentions how he would fence with shorter weapons so that a student would know what strategies would be employed against them. He also mentions that grappling is an essential part and that its something best learned in the salle rather than in a book.
Similarly Maestro Roman Punzalan Zapata covers his take on the spanish sword vs machetes, lances, and knives.
Great information! Any youtube video showcasing the Spaniard's take of battlefield use of the saber? It will be much appreciated! Or Mr. Easton is welcome to create one. :)
Very good point. I'm currently reading the book you are talking about (the english translation by Jakelsy). The part talking about knifes is interesting. Too bad it's a bit short. I was planning a class with my students about it (i teach military saber from Roworth mainly, and a bit of Merelo atm). Some parts are a bit too incomplete : he says for exemple to use your offhand for parrying, but does not explain how. I was planning to fill the void with a few krav maga / self defense techniques because that's something i know, but i'm also trying to find other knife fighting sources at the moment. If you got any pointers, feel free to share :) I'll look up that Punzalan dude ;)
@@JeremyRoyaux I’ve experimented with it but it comes with my background with other things and isn’t necessarily what Merelo intended which is just how interpretation works with HEMA lol we have separate baggage to Merelo. Imo I wouldn’t over think it.
Punzalan Zapata isn’t in English (well I have a semi edited translation I’ve done) but I can share the bits on dissimilar weapons.
@@wildyracing1 I don’t think so, I could give it a go at creating one but it might be a little bit. Would need to bug a friend or two and refresh my knowledge on his specific advice.
@@matthewlawrence7056 That sounds great! Keep my fingers crossed to see it.
I especially enjoyed discussion of use of the pommel, and the apparent tradeoff between the fastest possible instant response vs the option of a slightly slower but likely more deadly strike, either point or more devastating cut.
I think this would be a pretty difficult situation for the swordsman without a shield. These seem more like emergency techniques where you’re hoping the enemy over commits on the cut. I don’t think they are invalid, more like you’re trying to make the best of a bad situation.
I don't really disagree, the swordsman with a shield has an advantage (well if you ignore revolvers and pistols). But the moment you get a good grab on their sword arm, the advantage now swings to the sabreur. Once grabbed, the shield guy is in big trouble.
Both the footwork as well as the sickle-like motions of those defences bear a striking resemblance to Okinawa-style Karate. I am thinking of Uechi Ryu or Gojo Ryu . Great video, cheers🙂
Hey, we did the exact same thing with Marozzo, Fiore and Leckuchner. I recognize those movements and actions. Grab, twist and strike.
Probably not useful in my daily life, but very enjoyable. Changes in any system after analysis are always fun to me. Since there is currently very little growth in swordmanship from use, I sometimes get the idea that what I see presented was BEST, rather than another stage in development. Thanks for this.
The original video was very well presented. I love the demonstrations of "battlefield fencing" involving grappling and free hand manipulations!
I gotta read more of these books
I watched this when it premiered during Dreynevent. Thank you for bringing it up again. This is simply great.
many different grips in the shinkage-ryu marobashikai where the interaction of two opponents dressed in armor is considered. therefore, they do not cut with a sword, but use it to overcome the distance and various ways of knocking an opponent to the ground. At the same time, both the impact of the sword of the performer of the technique on the body of the opponent along its weak vectors and lines, as well as various kinds of levers and tacks are used. in fact, this is a technical analogue of European fencing books on the theme of a two-handed or one and a half sword, but in the form of a living tradition and not speculative reconstructions
That's great. Do they spar and compete?
@@scholagladiatoria is a traditional Japanese school of old martial arts. As a rule, sparring and competitions are not held in such schools. The documents of the school contain information that once such a practice took place. At present, in Japan, the technique is studied by the method of formal kata repetitions. Unlike the Japanese, I do randori (free fights) with my comrades.
Thanks Matt I enjoyed that one. I can imagine that being very useful to young gentleman and when reading historical accounts of battles I can see how this instruction was used .
Great video, one critique is that its very obvious the "attacker" is not putting full force into the swing. With forward momentum on a swing they should easily be pushing the blocking blade, but in all these videos the attackers blade stops basically dead as soon as it makes contact with the attackers sword. This would definitely change some of these subtly as the 'defenders' balance will be different by trying to hold back the momentum of the 'attackers' sabre.
These aren't heavy swords and the opponent is likely a small brown tribal person, so probably perfectly valid.
I disagree. The 'attacker' is performing full force cuts. Properly executed parries with a sabre will stop the hardest hits. If you parry with the weak of the blade then certainly the blade can be pushed but parries using the forte are rock solid.
@@chaimafaghet7343 valid.....till they still lost their empire to "small brown tribal people" lol
@@derigel7662 Their empire was lost to international finance. The browns didn't do shit.
@@chaimafaghet7343 wow thats racist as shit ty imma report that
This is an incredible video! More of this Matt! If you want to break down sword systems in this way, (commentary over video examples) I would want to watch as many videos of that as you could make!
Fascinating video. Interesting to hear about guys still developing combat styles right up until the weapons become obsolete.
Matt Easton, you're the best. Thank you for your earnest dedication.
This improves my faith and love for HEMA.
Thank you for covering this, Mr. Easton. I anticipate more coverage of this topic with electric enthusiasm.
Very interesting as always. I am always surprised to hear the Khyber Knife was primarily a cutting weapon, but you have mentioned British army medical reports confirming this in one of your earlier videos. The ones I have handled have a rigid spine and would make powerful thrusting weapons; I wonder if those records have survivorship bias-- the soldiers who were stabbed instead of slashed didn't make it to the doctor?
Yeah, pretty obviously the Tribesmen didn't decline the opportunity "Well, I COULD have stabbed him in the armpit before he had fully turn to me, but
this is a slashing weapon
it says so in ALL of the literature after all, there were Foreigners watching, wouldn't want them to think I was a noob".
That's exactly what i thought since triangular make unstichable wounds, imagine a spined knife of that size! Only way you could possibly survive an encounter with it is by being slashed!
Late reply of course but some were used for thrusting, but that is a quality difference of the weapon in question, a lot of the cheaper knives would be “soft”
That was all really interesting, thank you for making that available to us! ^_^
incredible, thanks for the opportunity to copy and work around
What an excellent video. Thank you so much, Matt. It is fascinating to see how swords were really used in relatable battle. I'm sorry, I love the medieval content you do, but this more modern look was just great.
Modern swordsmanship is more interesting than ancient or medieval swordsmanship, at least in a military context. They were generally far more martial contests, and far more bloody and lethal, since armor and shields were seldom used in the modern era. Swords before the modern era are mostly just tools to accomplish some kind of specialized purpose.
Matt Easton, you're the best. Thank you for your earnest dedication.. Its good that Hutton combined other martial arts with it.
Amazing stuff! I was always amazed at Hutton's research into older swordplay. Is it too much to call him the "Father of HEMA"? Love the practical demonstrations.
thanks Matt, been hunting for this for weeks
Dude this was awesome!
Awesome video; very interesting. It would be awesome if you expanded and showed modern-day options for these types of attacks.
Fascinating and important work.
I googled "battlefield sabre techniques" yesterday and was met with a dearth of practical info. A lotta "light saber" nonsense. Yeah. Anyway, saw a Scholagladiatoria notification this afternoon and, lo! Ask and yea shall receive. Thanks, Matt!
Lovely presentation, we are working with a local Scottish broadsword school due to similar interests. Your mate was cutting a bit more in the European fashion which I suppose is fine for the demonstration. But it would be cool to see it done more from the shoulder while spilling forwards. It might actually make the advice a bit more advantageous actually
That's a very fair comment
I disagree that all european martial arts held the bucklers at arm's length exclusively. Marrozzo himself says it's ideal but not strictly neccessary. Also most brassards (anti-grappling tournament armor that locks the arm in place) have the arms at a half-bend. In addition, KDF and non i.33 sword and buckler has the buckler as close as the indian fencer in the dreyschlang video as a resting guard, only going further as a reactive response (bucklers are a reactive defense after all).
Easton didn't use the words "all European Martial Arts" or "exclusively" and IMO they weren't implied.
You are disagreeing with a strawman argument, that Matt didn't make. Congrats to you and the dittoheads that upvoted your comment.
I didn't say they did 😊
That was a really interesting video! Thanks Matt! Lots of what I see here is similar to the way we do fencing in Quebec's Scrimicie
These videos are awesome! It's cool to know more about swordsmanship. I don't want to just go to my nearby hema class and only learn about long sword.
Onlineschlag event was amazing, hope I wish wish they continued the project even though lockdowns are over
Matt you're a legend ❤
Fantastic video! Great analysis; thank you.
GREAT video - more like please ! I look forward to part 2 where you talk about the better alternatives you alluded to.
It kind of reminded me of some of the ideas that I saw in a demonstration of the Shawnee (Native American tribe) martial arts. Seizing with the off hand, grapples, using the tomahawk to first hook and then coming back around to strike with it.
And remember to always restomp that groin.
Great video. Very informative. ⚔
As someone who practice sabers, that use hammer grip and blows with power of whole arm I can say that paring powerful strikes with lite saber and a this gentle grip is much difficult than it looks
You have no idea, how helpful this video is with some fight sceans I've been struggling to write... ❤ You channel 😺🐈👍.
Indiana Jones knows how to end a swordsman quickly
In fact this of course was the main recourse of British officers, with 5 and 6 shot revolvers... but in war those 5 or 6 shots would be gone fairly quickly and with multiple enemies the sword does not run out of ammo.
This is a very well written and presented video, at least from my perspective. I like to consider myself a quick learner, but I have very limited experience with HEMA, most of it in longsword and basic European sabre and I found the information contained within easy to understand and - if I wished - implement to start learning these techniques.
Which, as an aside, strike me as eminently practical, particularly given the role of an officer in combat of the period and the likely opponents. Someone else commented that these seemed like desperation moves, as a buckler armed opponent has a considerable advantage, and I would somewhat agree - but the shield / blade armed swordsman has to reach engagement range through firearm fire, making these situations either applicable in surprise engagements, or in the closing elements of more conventional engagements - at least, I would assume that, without knowledge of the Afghan war of the day - and those situations are by their nature desperate and bloody.
Rob Roy movie shows I think well what a dandy can do. It’s one of the best sword fighting scenes in all movies.
Lots of contemporaries might look at him and laugh. But he was a rock star of the day and lethal. They practiced daily for hours and they fought dirty.
Grappling an equal is one thing. But someone like a master would not allow you to close without obliging you with serious injury or death.
Also if it’s life or death the stakes and mistakes are many. To remain calm in those situations is where the training comes in.
The wars between the Danish vs North English were the earliest example of the behind the knee or leg attacking technique as far as I have heard of. The protection armour, interlocking chain armour, was vulnerable to the early Danes. The mercilessly aggressive Danish were trouble. This period was within the 13th, 14th century.
There is, or used to be, a YT clip of an Indian martial artist using a sword (tulwar) and a spiked buckler. The buckler was employed as a stabbing weapon, punching the opponent with the spike, while the swords were bound.
Yes that would certainly make the buckler more dangerous, though once the sword arm is grabbed, the free sword is still going to be cutting and stabbing a lot, and is more agile than a buckler.
@@scholagladiatoria I can't find the clip, which is frustrating. I recall what struck me - no pun intended - was that the sword was employed as a very dangerous distraction that had to be honored, while the buckler was revealed to be the threat that finished the match.
Nice Wrap at 7:24 followed by a draw. Amazing how practical it is even with a saber.
It will also work to the back of leg to hamstring somebody.
People who have never executed any of these cuts are going to come along and say it's not a wrap. Unless you regularly use back edge cuts you don't know what a wrap is and how flexible and versatile it is. 7:24
" inspired by earlier sources" 🙂
What I find interesting is that the ability to use the hand seems more advantageous than to have a buckler.
It's "top gun" training (dissimilar combat training) for swords.
Matt, with your extensive reading, experimentation, and experience the HEMA world would greatly benefit from you authoring some kind of fighting manual in modern language-- not so much a history lesson as a practical textbook. A separate volume describing and summarizing historical sources techniques would also be extremely interesting.
Edit: while I’m planning out your time for you, please make something that doesn’t look like crap on a kindle.
I don't really feel qualified to. I feel like the older I get, the more I find I don't know.
@@scholagladiatoria Well, this is perhaps a case of knowing too much: how does one select the very best approach out of all the old treatises, and what about the source materials you haven't read and will likely never read? Analysis paralysis. What if you lowered the bar a bit though: from Fiore to Hollywood? Instead of a Magnum Opus, what would you write if you only had 30 pages to keep someone alive... or only 10 pages... or only 3 pages? Finally, let out a sigh of relief when you realize that you're not actually responsible for keeping anyone alive, because no one these days walks around wearing a sword expecting to settle a dispute with another so armed. Rather, your primary audience is likely people who own some wall hangers and maybe cut a few water bottles on occasion, but otherwise draw a complete blank when they hold a sword and would like to have some idea of how to go about thinking about how to use it. Either the book is intriguing enough to get them to join a HEMA school, or it's a fascinating glimpse; both outcomes are a success. Mull it over, anyways.
@@scholagladiatoria, age is corrosive. You have a wonderful store of knowledge and experience and it would be a shame if a lifetimes work is lost after you pass on. Better to get it down on paper now than to wait until your declining years. Besides, all the greats wrote books. Without them there would be no HEMA. Join the Great Conversation and help progress the art.
You know more than I do :)
I feel so grateful for your content great stuff, I will try to incorporate these techniques with my combatives, thank you.
Thank you for this video, we are working on alot of these movments currently with my group, grapples are a very fun technique and should be used more often I think in sparring and tournaments.
Intriguing. I'm Fascinated by sword work. Liked it!
I'd love to see the reaction video of a HEMA guy specialised in renaissance techniques.
Thank you for the video it was very informative and entertaining ⚔️
Outstanding!!!!!
Reminds me of the movie Rob Roy, the dueling scene at the end, saber versus rapier.
This is very interresting.
I looked for one of the books and found one on eBay.👍
Regards from Limburg, Germany.
Behold, the origin of all modern military martial arts!
Again, tshirts of greatness! Do you have any bad ones? No!
Great video
Excellent info. Not sure if you have already covered “khukri” but would love to learn more about its origins. ❤
That head is nicely shaved and polished. Customers will know you maintain your blades well
More techniques to add to my toolkit, yippee!
A weapon from a more civilized age
Depends on who you ask and what is meant by "civilized". ;)
@@andresmorera6426whoosh...
@@grantcox4764 did I miss an obvious reference? 😬
@@andresmorera6426 a very obvious reference, sorry.
I still prefer a blaster
The offhand weapon passes remind me of what I have been taught in FMA work. Very good video
Not to disparage this at all - these are effective techniques - but this kind of parry followed by open hand grappling and then counterattacking are techniques I was taught in the first year of studying Eskrima. Because Eskrima swordsmanship involves mainly short swords and knives (there is some saber), grappling the enemy's limbs is very common, very fast, and usually results in a quick exchanges of grapples, counter-grapples, close range strikes or other similar maneuvers (including a lot of open hand blade deflection against the flat of the blade, or outright grasping - usually the false edge). Considering that Eskrima was influenced by Spanish swordsmanship, it's not surprising. but nice to see the same ideas appearing/being discovered elsewhere. Eskrima continues to develop to this day alongside modern weapons (in other words, firearms) and if you know the roots and can follow along the development paths of its various schools, you can find a lot of history in there.
A lot of this looks a lot like medieval langesmesser. I love it :)
Very interesting ……probably not part of RMA Sandhurst instruction but should of been.⚓️
Thanks for another great video, this was the video I was looking for when I found the video where you talk about pistol. This is exactly what I was after and answers very well some thought and questions I was having in my own mind. I was interested you mention a French system that includes the use of the scabbard, as this was also a train of thought I was having in my mind, could you name the source so I can find it. Interesting what you said about small sword and 133. I will get hold of these. As I am realy more interested in the use of Saber on the battlefield, as like you said combative. Going to try this out with a friend. Thanks again for the Great insight. Dan.
I started Judo in 1967 and taught it for a couple of decades, I see all kinds of foot sweeps available., I wonder if anyone in HEMA utilize this art?
I personally don't know anything about Judo, but people who do can definitely use that to their advantage. Usually people will be hesitant to do that sort of thing since it could lead to injuries, but I got to know someone with Judo training who very much enjoyed closing in to grapple. I'm not sure how much of what she did was strictly related to Judo, but she did occasionally inform me that I should put my weight somewhere else.
Like how when they're going full contact the shield user doesn't just let himself be manipulated. You can see he struggles when his arm is grabbed and uses the shield to evercome and block the counter several times. Vary good techniques.
The tank general, General Patton, had a looong career. He started as a cavalry officer. Designed the last official for combat use sword. Held the unique title "Master of the Sword". Bronze in the Olympics. I heard a rumor of a short manual for cavalry by him from this time before WWI but can't research this point. I have seen a return showing 40,000 of this pattern sword in the far east in 1940: 18,000 cut down and issued as machetes in the Philippines.
Patton wrote an official manual in 1914 and also published his "Diary of an instructor in Swordsmanship"
Thank You!@@S.A.M.S.2017
Fantastic!
its really bizarre that the fencing instruction assumes that the entire time your opponent is attacking you, theyre not following up, not resisting your grapple, and not really utilizing their shield.
the guards also seem quite odd in regards to leverage and measure
That was the first thing that struck me as well. That being said, if you at least know the techniques, you'll quickly be able to learn what actually works and what doesn't with a bit of actual sparring. I believe even Musashi mentioned something about learning all the basics of every style and not bothering with the advanced stuff.......that was all commercial BS lol.
I mean it's a book, not an actual instructor. Resistance tends to be left to the world of practice rather than put down on paper
In real life its harder to respond fluidly to an unexpected situation than people usually assume. You see this a lot with for example how strikers who don't do MMA say they'd respond to getting tackled vs how they still end up on their back when someone tackles them unless they trained specifically to defend against tackles.
We do unarmoured sparring on a weekly bases with blunt olimpic fencing sabres usually towards to the end of our regural HEMA session. I would say one needs huge balls to attempt a wrist grab / grip in a situation where sharps and no armour involved. Great video though.
Does the person with the buckler have an advantage if they are equally skilled?
Basically yes, which is why if you're armed with a sword and revolver, once the revolver is empty and you still have opponents, you have to train specific techniques to try and even the balance.
All the arm trapping in the first moveset is really similar to basic chinese dao moves
Yes, a lot of these techniques are found all over the world across several centuries.
Very interesting vid - showing once again why context makes for better understanding of our shared world-history! 👍🏻
More often than not, however, the terminology of swordsmanship can lead to raised eyebrows:
Like when we combine swordplay with "an appendix of the rear" (😳);
How to pass the "Dutchie" on the lefthand side…
And don’t get me started on "Fingering the Guard"!
I’m sorry; but the jokes are pretty much writing themselves at this point… 😁
Some of these demonstrations remind me of traditional performance martial arts, where an answer to a single strikes involves multiple actions, while the training dummy holds the pose from that initial strike.
The video was made to demonstrate techniques. How else can you show the techniques without isolating a particular part? You learn the technique, you practice it and then you start to try and integrate it into your sparring which can take many many hours of work. Neither of these fencers do any kind of 'performance' martial arts. They are constantly hard sparring. Doubters can always attend an open sparring session and test their skills.
A major flaw in the instruction is that when you step in to grab your opponent's sword arm, they will almost certainly continue to step to the left, and at the same deliver a hard punch to the face with their buckler.
I just googled that works of Alfred Hutton I never knew he made that many books
Interesting material. Matt you mentioned that you think there are better sources to draw from than Silver for this- it would be interesting to see you expound.
Yes that could be an interesting topic to cover. I don't think Silver's grips and closes are bad, but these sorts of techniques are given more attention and shown with pictures in other sources which Hutton simply didn't have access to. For example Lecküchner or lots of rapier sources.
Don't the Bolognese sources contain grips? I think Hutton had access to Bologness sources or at least Marozzos work.
Also don't the Stage Gladiator sources also touch on grips a little?
Lekuchner is a cool source but it's bloated with some pretty impractical stuff. Silver even though lacking pics is much more straightforward and practical imo.
I really enjoyed this video.
_The Dread Crochet_
please write this book.
One observation I had as a layman is the European swordsman would have to be wary of being bashed and stunned by the other swordsman with his buckler or shield?
Yes, but that's why the grabs are so effective - the grab enables you to use your sword freely on the enemy. So they could bash you with the buckler, but they are going to end up dead from being stabbed at the same time.
I brought a Sabre when I deployed to a combat zone. Semper Fidelis!
Hey Matt, big fan of your channel! I was wondering if the preference for primarily 'cutting' weapons on the battlefield like the saber, the katana etc. can be explained because of the tendency of stabbing weapons like the rapier getting stuck in the body of the opponent. There are witness accounts from the first world war where bayonets stabbed between the ribs got stuck when the opponent fell to the floor and apparently even stabbing someone in the lower belly can lead to a contraction of the abdominal muscles and prevent the weapon from being withdrawn. Not much of an issue in a one-on-one confrontation but quite a nuisance when facing multiple opponents. Is there any historical support to this theory? Thanks in advance for your answer and effort and I look forward to your next video, preferably on the Dutch colonial klewang.
That is what we learn in Silat weapon fighting ... Very interesting presentation.
Come to think that my ancestors who fought the European were "uncivilised" 😅
Schol i used to do Kung Fu years ago and it was mainly unarmed combat but there were weapons training when you get higher up .They told me to get the unarmed combat right before you go onto weapons training because you can just substitute your empty hand with a weapon is that true ..Could this also be true in Europe 100s of years ago maybe with kids ?Edit :: Is this also true today should you do some martial arts like Fung Fu the basics before you go onto weapons training ..I think you did this right ?
I wish we had period records from non-European swordsmen. I'd love to see similar tips from Afghan, Indian, Japanese, Filipino, etc fighters on how to deal with European sabreurs.
So do I! They may actually exist, especially in China and Japan. New sources are coming to light all the time. I know there are treatises in India which nobody has really managed to get full access to yet.
Fantastic presentation. Did they include any moves or drills with a pistol still being drawn as well?
Not in this manual, but it is touched on in a few others.
How much do you find people successfully grab someone's sword arm when they spar? Not performing a drill but in spontaneous sparring practice?
Great stuff just waiting for the wife to come home so I can try out some of these moves on her