Hey Carrot, great stuff! I play mid-high stakes PLO so I don't even care that much about NL in a vacuum but good poker content in general can keep the thought train rolling. I thought I'd comment on the "folding sooner can save red line" because in my PLO coaching I have explained to players how the red line is wildly misunderstood. It's usually seen way too one-dimensionally as "if your red line sucks, you're too tight, not aggressive enough and folding too much" I think it's misleading, very often my students' red lines have went from plummeting to flat simply by having sharper choices in combos to call with and properly folding sooner vs significantly underbluffed spots/underbluffing players. It's unintuitive to most players to think that their red line could be dying because they don't fold enough but it can be true. I like to explain red line in a more zoomed out fashion of: "It's simply a measurement of how sharp your non-showdown play is, and sharpness includes well executed combo selection and WELL EXECUTED overfolding" Disciplined and accurate overfolding is actually a part of successful redline + good actual winrate. I really enjoy your channel among a few others as the logic behind things seems quite practical and many gems including this idea. Keep up the good work.
Not topic of this video, but I'm having kind of argument with friend. I'm aware the bet sizing should be determined by the landing equity and if you you have big equity the sizing should be bigger. I know that you don't recommend b33 on the river and also not the turn mainly. However, for example in 4 bets pot where the spr is smaller this shouldn't be true, right as btn vs sb 4 bet pot for example btn would always has advantage on lower and drier boards and there is no need to bet bigger, right?
Thx Pete for another great video! One thing about the 954tt BvB spot: SB isn't xr that super polar in theory, for example 9c8c xr at a pretty high frequency and therefore the 0.5P xr size seems fine to me. That said, in practice he might xr only a polar range, and then he should use big sizes (potsize raise) only. I guess that's your point?
I've been getting better at micros and had the same epiphanies Fold in underbluffed spots Punish capped ranges Bleed the sticky players for everything You don't really have complicate it or change much else
Hey Pete can I ask if you have a video update on Mark? I tried looking for one and was really interested to see if he could at least maintain break even.
I often think about this on 1/4 pot range bet flops against fish who will just almost never fold its so pointless throwing money away ive stopped now, and just kind of wing it on later streets even though its not "proper" poker, but if proper poker is making me lose money and not proper poker isnt, ill take not proper poker, in some spots, obviously not all spots.
I would personally prefer to watch one screen at a time, it's hard to follow what you're talking about sometimes since there's no immediate indication of which hand you're talking about.
I don't think you get in here to the Comments anymore, Peter. But I would like you to know that your free content is really appreciated. I WILL pay one day. I WILL subscribe one DAY. I will give you the MONEY you deserve and are owed by good will for your FREE content. NEW SUBSCRIPTION SCHEME I WILL PAY YOU. Thank You Peter.
Hey Carrot, great stuff! I play mid-high stakes PLO so I don't even care that much about NL in a vacuum but good poker content in general can keep the thought train rolling. I thought I'd comment on the "folding sooner can save red line" because in my PLO coaching I have explained to players how the red line is wildly misunderstood. It's usually seen way too one-dimensionally as "if your red line sucks, you're too tight, not aggressive enough and folding too much" I think it's misleading, very often my students' red lines have went from plummeting to flat simply by having sharper choices in combos to call with and properly folding sooner vs significantly underbluffed spots/underbluffing players. It's unintuitive to most players to think that their red line could be dying because they don't fold enough but it can be true.
I like to explain red line in a more zoomed out fashion of: "It's simply a measurement of how sharp your non-showdown play is, and sharpness includes well executed combo selection and WELL EXECUTED overfolding" Disciplined and accurate overfolding is actually a part of successful redline + good actual winrate.
I really enjoy your channel among a few others as the logic behind things seems quite practical and many gems including this idea. Keep up the good work.
Not topic of this video, but I'm having kind of argument with friend.
I'm aware the bet sizing should be determined by the landing equity and if you you have big equity the sizing should be bigger. I know that you don't recommend b33 on the river and also not the turn mainly.
However, for example in 4 bets pot where the spr is smaller this shouldn't be true, right as btn vs sb 4 bet pot for example btn would always has advantage on lower and drier boards and there is no need to bet bigger, right?
Thx Pete for another great video! One thing about the 954tt BvB spot: SB isn't xr that super polar in theory, for example 9c8c xr at a pretty high frequency and therefore the 0.5P xr size seems fine to me. That said, in practice he might xr only a polar range, and then he should use big sizes (potsize raise) only. I guess that's your point?
Folding?? Whats that? Raise raise raise til they fold 😂
I've been getting better at micros and had the same epiphanies
Fold in underbluffed spots
Punish capped ranges
Bleed the sticky players for everything
You don't really have complicate it or change much else
Hey Pete can I ask if you have a video update on Mark? I tried looking for one and was really interested to see if he could at least maintain break even.
Hello Pete, if i have already bought the full scholarship last year, could i still get a 3 months carrot corner subscription for free? Thanks!
Well checking nut flush there have added value of being perceived as weak nit and got maximum fold equity when he actually bets river :)
I often think about this on 1/4 pot range bet flops against fish who will just almost never fold its so pointless throwing money away ive stopped now, and just kind of wing it on later streets even though its not "proper" poker, but if proper poker is making me lose money and not proper poker isnt, ill take not proper poker, in some spots, obviously not all spots.
What about refined aggression, blind aggression and cautious aggression?
I thought the game was called Texas no foldem...
I would personally prefer to watch one screen at a time, it's hard to follow what you're talking about sometimes since there's no immediate indication of which hand you're talking about.
I don't think you get in here to the Comments anymore, Peter. But I would like you to know that your free content is really appreciated. I WILL pay one day. I WILL subscribe one DAY. I will give you the MONEY you deserve and are owed by good will for your FREE content. NEW SUBSCRIPTION SCHEME I WILL PAY YOU. Thank You Peter.
Love all the content you are making!!! Dont get used to press the bunny. GG is probably also taking rake for it in the near future.
Love the bit about how we need to accept we’re not always on our A game
''Sometime asking for it makes it come. Sometime it doesn't''. **taking notes...**
Great video! Appreciate it Pete!
Don't hope...work!
But if don't bluff my bottom range how will I get paid? 😂
What’s stakes are these
Medium rare
@@dantonkull6491Great banter, Well done.
oi you're the shait mate! cheers
Checks a nut flush.... I just laugh at these kind of mistakes thank you for saving me money.
Guy calls a block with two pair🤨 WTF😂