I don't think so. Mytek 8x192 is king. Neumann is the new prince. Crane Song Avocet II is great also as is Burl. RME is not even a duke. It's maybe an ayatollah but that's the best it can hope for. Great review by the way.
@@hayesbrotha I use a RME ADI -FS pro AD/DA & Motu Ultralite Mk 5. Sonically they sound similar to my ears , I wound gladly trade them both in for a Burl Bomber B2 interface . Out of my price range ☺️.
RME is rock stable. Best drivers, period. especially for pc. they make their own from scratch. they still support and update drivers for products they discontinued decades ago. Plus totalmix is a game changer. I have 3 rme interfaces, adi2 pro fs r, babyface (original), and HDSP 9632.
Yeah I know about the rock solid drivers and everything. It's just not as user friendly to me. I'm sure total mix is a game changer when you learn it. I didn't have enough time.
Got RME today and was disappointed. The power delivery looks very dodgy. The way it turns on. Amount of random contstant feedback when you simply plug it into the speakers until power on. Noise floor.... Also the highs were very distorted which kind of surprisingly goes inline with what Jack mentioned. Damn idk maybe I got unlucky but my uac-232 & ssl2+ interfaces sounded much better. I would double check RME units before settling on them.
@@veritas7010I have an UCX II for some time without any of the problems you referred. Maybe yours is unfortunately damaged. I believe you should try to change it.
1. Neumann 2. RME 3. Apogee 4. UAD I had the Neumann MT 48 and UAD Apollo X6, X8 and some Twins back in 2021 in my studio. But back to 2024 the Neumann MT 48 came out on top as absolut king in my testing and stayed as main interface for my studio.
I’ve owned all of these. I work at Sweetwater so get to test them extensively. The Neumann MT48 is far and away the best sounding converter and interface overall. The preamps are not adding any transformer or tube style harmonic saturation like I normally prefer from my BAE preamp but they still sound incredible. I normally like using an RND RNHP headphone amp, but the MT48 has one of the best sounding headphone amps I have used.
@@jordangunit3078 I agree. I had to keep that one! It was too clean for me at first but once I got adjusted to the sound I couldn’t go back to the Apollo. I use it with the RND Newton channel and it warms it up and adds some saturation. I connected it to my X6 through ADAT for recording so I can use the mt48 conversion before it hits the Apollo. Then I can use the real time UAD plugins. Best of both worlds.
@@jacksp8de agreed! yeah I kept my UA Apollo on the side for the same reason. I could easily just rock a UAD satellite too to support plugins but the extra IO is nice. In the future, I do think I’m Going to go all in for the Merging Hapi and connect the MT48 over AES 67 for high channel count but it will be expensive so the Apollo stays for now. RND newton is killer as well. Has their transformers and excellent signal processing.
@@jordangunit3078 Yeah I have an x6 and x4 and was thinking of selling the x4 but Im selling that DSP power too. I like having 10 Processors for mixing. The Merging hapi sounds incredible from what I heard online. I'm so good with current setup though. Testing some Neumann KH120s right now and this is it. I think I'm going to buy these and I'm good.
I have listed to. huge amount of reviews, I am only interested in the sound, and most them hardly mention this. All the other stuff is straight forward if you don't know how to run an interface you must be a novice, so how does it sound
In terms of sound quality, these are what I find on each of them from most to least favourite: Neumann = immersive Apogee = pristine Apollo = natural RME = transparent I enjoy producing on my Apogee SD but when I mix on it, it can be a bit too pleasant sometimes. It translates well but at the same time also brings emotion in the translation which can be somewhat distracting when you try to be critical. I’m not saying it’s colored. It’s transparent. The sound is full and in 3D in a good way. I don’t know, man. May be I need a pair of speakers which are quite clinical to compensate on it. 😂
I like your ranking. You put into words how I’ve been feeling about the SD. It sounds almost too good lol I feel that way about Neumann too except the separation can be a bit too much. The Apogee has the best preamps. Hold on to that SD. I sold mine and I regret it
When it comes to the best A/D converters, I think Apoge is the best for my taste (when it comes to music). Yes, the Neumann is a touch (maybe 10%) cleaner, more detailed and more “natural” sounding. But the Apogee has a fullness, breadth, musicality, a roundness that sounds very, very beautiful and is still EXTREMELY high-resolution. Since we make music and don't measure speakers, I find the Apogee much more suitable.
i own an rme ucx ii. i have researched all of these. for anyone interested definitely do a deeper dive into your research and what your needs are. The rme is probably the best interface of the four. it probably has the best clocking and the best conversion and its suppose to sound completely transparent with no coloration. totalmix software gives you the best routing and you get the most features. but to each his own...hopefully you do your own additional research because these are not cheap interfaces.
Fire Video as usual fam! If you're a person that travels a lot or want to be as portable as possible think about the RME Babyface Pro FS as well. It's Bus Powered and has INSANE stability and low latency on both Mac and PC. It replaced my Apollo X4 due to stability issues on Windows and it's size when traveling. It's also half the price of these. Personally if I drop around $2k it'll be to upgrade my Rack Mount Interface in my home studio.
@@v3zMedia thanks for watching bro. I know you didn’t like the x4 because you can’t bypass the preamps. I can bypass the preamps on the X6. The x4 is a monitor controller and extra dsp. I might sell it though. A rackmount would be the way to go I want a Symphony Mk2 SE
from what I could hear from both tests is that my favorite out of these is the RME. It doesn't have the depth as some of the others put it's the tightest and most pleasing to my ears. I'm currently using a Lynx Hilo and I'd strongly recommend checking one out if you haven't already.
@@sandyhollowstudio It so interesting how we hear differently. I find it a little plastic and I like the organic smooth sound of the Apogee the best. I would love to try the Lynx Hilo as well as an Apogee Symphony SE
Basically, RME's D/A lets you wake up and step out the door in your pajamas with your hair undone and no make up, just dead honest. While the other three insist on fixing your appearance at least a touch before letting you out the door - each to their own taste...
Amazing. My favorite is : For Vocal: 1. Apogee 2. Neumann 3. RME 4. UAD For Monitors : 1. Neumann 2. Apogee 3. UAD 4. RME I have a UAD SOLO and I'm thinking of going for the APOGEE, because the sound it delivers is everything I like. Thanks for this amazing review!
I bought last year a used RME FireFace UCX 1 for 630€ and im sooo Happy with this Interface, TotalMix is also wonderful (Once you understand it, it's like riding a bike) . That was the best decision in my life, ngl
Its interesting how the neuman sounds very different to all the others , it almost sounds like mono , and you hear that in the vocal and clap .. Im my opinion the Apogee sounds smoother and most balanced ... Great review Jack
I love the Apogee. I've compared it pretty extensively against the Apollo and some against thr Neumman, but the biggest difference to me is the highs and lows. The Apogee doesnt hype them like the Apollo does and gives a more true to life sound. When I do the car test now, I pretty much hear exactly what I heard in the studio.
@@outlawedbeats Yeah the Apollo has more forward midrange. The apogee has that clarity for sure but still has a warmness. Very pleasant to listen to for a long time.
love the vid, just throwing this out there, those jacks that accept both xlr and 1/4" inputs are commonly called combo jacks. Just in case you do more of these, which I hope you do, maybe this tid bit will help you out. So I couldn't help but notice that all of the interfaces you reviewed were all desktop units, and none from the rack mount form factor, which, for under 2G it should be pretty easy to have some really top notch rack units in there, and a lot of them will have a lot more onboard preamps, commonly 8 mic preamps on the 1U rack unit interfaces. And there are a lot of good units like that from manufacturers like MOTU, Presonus, Focusrite, UA, Apogee, Lynx, um.....even Behringer, yeah i know, but they are slept on and not really that bad. I've gotten great recordings from an X32 more times than I can count. Heck, for less than 2G, you can get a x32 now, and a bunch of other digital mixing consoles that have built in USB audio interfaces that enable you to get really high simultaneously recording track counts an)d a lot more including DAW control and a live digital console for performance. I feel like your review is aimed at producers that are generally doing a lot of VST's and maybe recording a guitar or bass guitar one at a time, and then doing some vocal overdubs, maybe trying to get a few keyboards in to the computer, but for the people that are trying to record whole bands playing the song live, (which is 100% necessary for the right feel if you ask me, if you overdub everything it will loose something, every time, I wish that it didn't but it does) they are going to need at least 8 mic inputs simultaneously and ideally the ability to make 4 separate headphone mixes, one for each player. At l east 2 separate headphone mixes, one for the vocalist and one for the band, or one for the drummer that has the click and one for the rest of the band. These are the choices you'll have to make if you don't have the ability to have more than 2 headphone mixes. The nice thing about that RME that you showed, is that it has the ability to use all of it's outputs as separate headphone mixes, you would just have to hook it up to a decent headphone amp. And if you add more inputs and outputs via one of the digital inputs like the ADAT lightpipe input, then you can use all of those outputs as well. The mixing app RME includes in their software is really great for tracking live bands, but let's be real, RME is a top tier interface manufacturer. They ain't no slouch. Having said that, an X32 which you can pick up for around 1400 used these days, also has the ability to have 8 separate stereo headphone mixes because it has like 16 XLR outputs right on the back of it. That is not including your main XLR outs or the 8 quarter inch aux in and outs that you can use to route effects in your studio. Anyone that tells you that you can't get great sounding recordings from something like a x32 is just lying to you. The difference between these units is honestly miniscule, and more often than not, has more to do with how much they cost or how much the person telling you about it actually spent on it. The RME is rock solid and their software is highly capable and you totally get what you pay for, but it isn't going to sound that much better than an x32, which input for input is probably the cheapest option, I mean you get 32 simultaneous inputs and 16 simultaneous outputs with an x32, with a 32x32 usb interface with it, that means you can record 32 inputs all at the same time into your DAW, all for the low price of 2G as of today. And you get an actual physical console that you can use either for your studio or live, you can use to take with you to record live also. They even have an expansion card that allows you to record and playback 32 tracks at a time without a computer straight to an external hard drive or dual SD cards. You can just keep some big SD cards in there and anytime anywhere, just hit record and it's recording whatever is playing through the board, all multitrack without a computer attached. That's just too cool if you ask me. So if you want to buy into the UA Apollo ecosystem and get the benefit of it's onboard DSP so that you can track through their plugins in real time, then by all means, do that. And that might be the best option especially for the desktop producers out there who are just recording vocal overdubs every now and then and also oing a lot of other production work with beat machines, keyboards, and VST instruments. The Neumann is definitely geared towards someone that wants the highest quality inputs and AD/DA for the money but what brings it down is the fact that the RME has awesome converters on it too. They are known for that, Neumann makes great microphones and is brand new in the interface world, this is their first offering of a music interface, keep that in mind. RME has been making only audio interfaces and ADDA converters. That is all they do. And they are really good at it. So I wouldn't sleep on that interface, but it's probably going to shine for someone that wants to add an additional preamp with more inputs and outputs to it, and use it as a desktop controller too. Just my 2 cents or 26 or whatever cents...Peace.
Mannn I got too much ADD to read every word but I agree with what I read. Yeah I know those are combo jacks and Neumann is great, but mostly I did this video to show it really doesn’t matter which one you pick. You can make great music with whatever allows you to record.
Thanks for this! I have been on the fence about upgrading my Apollo Twin X. Like you, I love the workflow and the plugins. My main reason to upgrade would be for noticeable ad/da improvement, but I think from your testing these other units, the difference is so marginal and subjective. I’m gonna keep my Apollo Twin X for a while longer, and see what UA does on the next Apollo Twin and X4 release. Thanks again!
Hmm.. very useful comparison. Thanks for doing this. RME is brutally honest, so it sounds a bit "colder" and more clinical, what may seem "brittle". The symphony has a beautiful balance across the frequency spectrum, kinda like the name implies, think classical music recordings, and maybe it ever so slightly gates quick attacks... The UAD has some of that similar "pleasant" sound, but you're right the bottom end is muddier, and just overall the image is less focused (we're of course splitting hairs, but once our ears 'zoom in', they can look like big hairs 😅). The MT48 is definitely the most impressive sounding - the image is very tight, and there's definitely a 'sound' or a color to it - not drastic, but it's there. It flattered the music the most it seems, bearing in mind we're only discussing the D/A right now. The bass is accentuated a bit, but not hyped, just super definite and there seems more "distance" in terms of frequency separation from other instruments so you can pay attention to each more easily, and it almost invites you to listen to separate parts at a time instead of listening to the whole, which of course you can (and will if you work on it regularly). You're right each one is plenty good to make great records... it's a time of great access to quality like never before
I agree. The pleasant sound is probably harmonic distortion. I feel like that can be good for AD but for DA you may want a more neutral sound for mixing or mastering. For production it’s just about what you prefer. I feel like the MT48 is neutral enough but still has that color as you say. RME sounds slightly crunchy to my ears more digital I guess. It’s hard to explain but it sounds like plasticky. It has a good sound tho just not as organic imo
All of these are going to sound great. The Neumann clearly has the edge on conversions with RME and Apogee closely behind it. When i went from my Apollo Twin X to my now RME UCXii there was a DRASTIC difference in clarity. I dont think the Twin X has the exact same conversion as the X4 though. I believe X4 is a dual path or something. Either way, RME is known for being transparent. Not adding or removing anything. That said some people perceive that as sterile or cold. Its what i want personally. Havent used Apogee. The Apollo workflow just wasnt for me even though i love the plugins. RME and TotalMix is my absolute jam. At this pricepoint honestly its all about which workflow you prefer.
@@LaminarSound yep it’s cool that we have all of these choices. RME wasn’t for me but the sound was good. I do hip hop so I like the harmonic distortion of Apollo but I switched to the MT48 because it just sounds so damn good but still keeping the Apollos for I/O and the console workflow.
I was an apogee user for years. Couldn’t keep them working. Great sounding, terrible software and driver support. Switched to Rme. Very clean, not colored like apogee, so I get the color when I mix. No problems since I switched!
I had an Apogee element and it sounded good but the software was buggy, then they end of lifed it. I do love that apogee color, but yes RME is transparent and you can add the color in. Thanks for watching!
Almost exact same story. The Duet I owned just wouldn't behave in terms of drivers. Bought the One as a headphone amp/converter on the go and Apogee refuses to support it with modern devices. RME not only saved the day with rock-solid drivers and firmware, but the level of transparency on my UCX was shocking compared to the Apogees.
Hi, thanks for this comparison, personally I have been using an X6 and a Twin X for about 5 years, I also have RME Babyface. All the interfaces are extremely top and sound really good. After that it will depend on what you want to do with it. I like the Apollo system and its Plugins, because in my opinion, when recording it is the closest to real studio conditions, but that's just my opinion. Luna is really fantastic in recording, yeah always the impression of working on a big analog console ...
@@scorpion-unitrap5452 I totally agree. The Apollos have a sound that is really good for most popular music. Alone Again is one of my favorite songs and it was done with just an Apollo and an SM7b. And I love Luna. Thanks for watching.
Are all of these better than the Focusrite 18/20 3rd Generation ??? I was looking at the rme to replace it but im wondering how much of a difference will it make ???
I've never used that interface so I don't know how much of a difference it would make. You have to figure out what about your current sound and workflow is not working and find the interface that solves that.
RME every single time. I'm using my RME Hdspe AIO over 15 years now with zero problems. I'm also a user of the RME UCX II and it's the best in class and beats a lot of 4-5k products.
Hey man, Thanks for your great review. became a new subscriber. I just wanted to comment on what I think is one of the most important feature on the MT48 as the owner which did not get mentioned too much in the video. And it is the Audio Networking (Audio over IP) Capability of the interface. Having native support to the AES67 means that it has the ability to grow its input and output to 128 ins and outs by using the virtual sound card on your computer and could integrate the MT48 into it. You could also connect it to dante-enabled products such as Yamaha Rios for more analog inputs and outs. You could convert the audio to SFP or madi and have a fiber cable deliver your audio to destinations only capable with such cable. Clock syncing and working together with other devices such as media servers, lighting equipment and so on could be done via the network. above are just examples of what could be achieved with audio over IP and it surely makes your studio a lot more flexible and expandable. The prices might look a bit high for MT48 when you compare the interfaces you mentioned the video, but I personally feel that the audio over IP capabilities of the interface more than justifies the cost of the device. Of course, I understand that many of the viewers might not need such a feature, and thus went over it briefly in the video. So please understand that I'm in no way trying to point fingers or criticize the opinions in the video and in the comment section. Just wanted to provide extra context haha. but anyways, thanks for your content and hope to see great content like this in the future as well.
Thanks for the info! I’m sure it’ll help someone. I knew about that stuff vaguely but since I never used it, and probably won’t for a while, I didn’t have the authority to talk about it. Thank you for subbing by the way!
i am confused in what should i get confused in between apogee symphony mk2 io and apollo x8p mostly recordng producing hip hop, funk pop and some classical projects as well mixing mastering and film mix and atmos in future suggest me buddy where should i invest
I don't think the Apollo does atoms? Maybe the x16 does. That one sounds better than the rest of Apollos. That said I would still go with the Symphony SE version.
I think all four sound good. What differences harmonically you hear could also be done with plugins. So I guess in the end, it comes down to Workflow, I/O that meets your needs the best, which one you think looks coolest for your setup.
@@Seraph137 I totally agree with that. The Apollo looks the coolest and I love the workflow but the mt48 sounds the best and still looks dope. I got the mt48 running into the Apollo
If you have to choose one for an ITB mix monitoring setup, what's the one you take? I'm looking for someth'ng not 'best sounding' in the studio but more about how mixs translates on other systems. Thanks💪
@@julienromeo7210 any one of these can do what you want. You’ll have to learn the sound. If you’re doing mostly mixing I would choose either the MT48 or the Apogee
@@jacksp8de Thanks! The Neumann is also my no1 choice but expensive...it's for a second setup, as I have a héritage ram 2000 in my main room and it's great. Some friends told me apogees are often 'flattering', so I prefer not to have bad surprises outside the stud💪
@@julienromeo7210 I get you. I think even though Apogee sounds super pleasing, it does translate once you get used to it. My mixes sound better on the MT48. I'm demoing the Neumann KH120s and I don't know how anything can sound any better.
WOW I AM SURPRISE, I HAVE APOLO X4 GOOD. HONESTLY THE 1st WINNER HIRE IS THE NEUMANN MT48 HAVE MORE CLEAR SOUND PRESENCE AND THE 2nd SYNPHONE. 3rd APOLO X4, 4th RME, this what i ear and feel in my Dr.Dre beatpro monster.
Well I beg to differ, RME is very clear and controlled noise with great width. Other interface seems to add color to them but they also seems to distort sound quality. RME for me wins it. Thank for the vide
You’re welcome. I agree the others color the sound. I like that color or harmonic distortion. I am not primarily a mixing or mastering engineer though so I care about “vibes”
good review. there is an envelope of luxurious dynamic range that this level of box wraps around your notes that the $100-200 entry level boxes don't offer. something to strive for. btw nice sample track there, if that's you, that shows real talent imho, little bit of marvin weaving into the beats. and lovely lady as well, nice to see
Yes even though entry level stuff is very good these days, it does get a lot better. Yes that is a song I produced and rapped on. Thank you for the compliments and support. I’ll let wifey know too. 🙏🏾
My two choices are the apogee symphony to Neumann mt48 as far as sound quality goes. Id go with the Neumann for the features and more I/o than the symphony.
@@arirahimzadehthat’s what I’m currently using. On my channel my latest single “you inspire me “ was tracked with the symphony and u87 mixed on my genelecs. Turned out crazy
A good audio interface is not only about converters...it's also about workflow... And uad wins hands down about plugins quality ! Most of very big professional studios have it... so, think about it, there is good reasons.
RME no doubt at all. More I/O, never fails, drivers works rock solid, good sound quality, DSP (comps, eq, rev, delay). You can map and route it however you need. Great conversion. I have one from 2010, still works perfectly, still receive firmware updates from RME. No doubt in my opinion…
I respect it man. Gotta give it up for being reliable and hella flexible. It’s deeper but seems more complex. I imagine all RME users have androids lol
They all sound great with slight differences. Most of the time the interface doesnt matter as you just want a clean signal with fast transfer and good conversion which most modern interfaces have. I would just get a uad volt with kali monitors instead of breaking the bank over minuscule differences personally 🤷♂️
I'm not mad at that. You have to do whats right for you. I make an income with music so I invest for high quality gear, because it makes my job easier. If it was a hobby I'd be fine with a much cheaper interface.
I hate to love Apogee because there are a lot of versatile interfaces (Apollo/ MT48) out there, but sadly don't sound as great in my opinion. Great review by the way, and even better tune. I don't listen to a lot of rap, but this a great song. Keep up the great work.
Haha I understand the love hate thing with Apogee. They have an amazing sound though. And thanks I appreciate the feedback! I am releasing more music soon. Thanks for watching!
Are the RME converters in this unit the same as UFXIII converters?....seems like they changed converters between the 2 units but I may be mistaken....FYI the reason I ask, I am looking to purchase the UFXIII that's not part of this review....sorry for being a little off topic!
Ok looks like they have updated them based on the statement below on their website. The Fireface UFX III is based on a newly developed analog and digital board. While the analog board offers, for example, DC-coupled analog outputs as well as new AD and DA converters with improved THD+N value, the digital board also enables interesting new features thanks to updated high-tech components.
@@jacksp8de what about the Antelope Discrete 4 Pro, have you already compared the sound? I think the Neumann is in another category but Antelope is $1K less
I am an RME guy. Got a UFX+ and a Babyface pro FS. I mainly went with REI for the rock solid drivers and I know that we support my interfaces for 20+ years. And when you’re spending $3000 for an interface, that’s the way it should be. The fact that it sounds good is icing on top of the cake for me. And they keep on giving me stuff like the new room option and total mix FX.
@@darkmaer yes that’s awesome. I’m the kind of person that likes to upgrade to check out the newest things but I can appreciate that RMEs will last longer than my car lol
I have an RME and I love it. When first listeningen to it, I thought the sound was "thin", but that is because it is so clean as it has extremly low harmonic distortion. It is also very flat also in the high frequency range, which may make you think it has too much of it. The other interfaces have varying degrees of extra harmonic distortion and as this is what we are used to listening to in modern music, I assume this is the reason you liked the sound of the other intefaces more. If you record with the RME, you will have to add extra harmonic distortion later during mixing to get to the sound of modern music. With RME you get almost 0 harmonic distortion from the interface, so you can pick any type of saturation you like. Or leave it out completely for that extra clean and crispy sound. Your choise.
@@BengtSkogvall I recorded through a Neve Newton channel with silk so there was harmonics. It didn’t sound bad or anything. They all sound good, I just prefer the others. I like the apogee pres the best. RME is does have less color. I enjoy the coloration of the Apogee. It also has the lowest noise based on loop back testing that I’ve seen on other channels. Thanks for watching.
Exactly what I was thinking the RME is the best sounding interface with the apollo in my opinion the transients on the other interfaces doesn't sound smooth
@@nils2660 you gotta hear the others in person the apogee is super smooth, the MT48 is sharp but super clean, and you can change the filter in it and other choices are smoother. It has 4 settings
10:55 I don't understand what the point of this test is. Unlike comparing multiple microphones, it must not have been easy to compare multiple interfaces. So if that's the case, it would have been much better to play the same audio recorded at the same location and compare the differences when recording the sound with each interface. Listing and comparing each waveform or spectrogram would have also been a good reference.
@@Tootluminary The point was to compare the preamps and analog to digital conversion. Like my homegirl Tina Turner used to say, I never do anything nice and easy lol and you wasn’t around with your suggestions when I recorded it so now it’s done. No regrets. Thanks for watching!
RME for the win imho. I'm not gonna get sold on peer pressure and glitzy glamour......the stability on RME baby face pro FS makes me appreciate it EVERY.SINGLE.DAY Hope someday I have the money to afford the UCX ii or III in the near/distant future
End game I think for me is MT 48 > into UAD console via adat > back to MT 48 via adat. Best of both world with Neumann/merging conversion but can take advantage of UAD dsp which is still king of the hill. Expensive but not really if you your figure the price of the Neve Channelstrip or equivalent. Unconventional I know... 🙂
Still use RME pcie cards, nothing touches the latency figures they produce. But i understand the need for a breakout interface if your working with a laptop or small form factor pc.
Antelope Audio ZEN TOUR Synergy Core - I wonder if anyone has any thoughts on this, I bought it 1 week ago, paired with HD650 (Sennheiser Headphones) and its just totally AMAZING from what I experience, hear.
Copy-pasta, spent time typing it for another comment, thought why not "Bit late, but had the DA shot out against the RME ADI-2 DAC FS R, and the Apollo Twin X, as well as many other like Motu M4, Arturia Audiofuse, older Apogee and the MT48 wins bar none, it's not even close, and on both the speaker outs and headphones. Which is surprising especially when it came to the RME, which was much more expensive price per channel, and has superior DA chip specs. It all comes down to implementation and neumann is one of the best at that. Also talked to a guy that has experience with lots of very expensive gear, runs a trinnov direct out for his studio, and he says the only converters that can surpass it are the super high-end rack mounted converters. AD-wise it's the best I've personally tried, tho I've not done very detailed side-to-side comparison. The AD conversion itself is better than the built-in one on a Neve 88M (used the sends from 88M's pre), and miles ahead my old Arturia Audiofuse, which I thought was already really good. Specs wise the AD chip is higher spec'ed than the one in the Apollo Twin X, also a few voiceover channels had reviewed the AD. For an audible grasp you can check out this vid by Jack Spade titled "The Best Audio Interface under $2000). I'm obviously passionate about this interface as it has improved my working life so much over the past few months of ownership. The few downsides tho, are that I get freezes about 2% of the time (still records and plays, but settings are frozen until restart), it takes close to a minute to start up, and it runs rather hot and requires good ventilation."
Thanks for sending people to the video I appreciate that. After using the MT48 for a while I totally agree with you. At first I thought the highs were suppressed a bit because Apollo had more air with its AD but the MT48 is just more natural and a lot more open. I would say that the Symphony desktop has amazing preamps and AD as well and some may prefer it. I did until I spent more time with the MT48. I sold the Symphony desktop and sent back the RME and kept the MT48. Still keeping my Apollo X6 and using the MT48 as an AD converter by going out and into the Apollo through ADAT. I like using Luna with the real time plugins. I’m actually surprised how good it sounds. I may sell the X4 or keep it for the DSP, not sure yet. The Neumann is next level and sounds amazing with the Lauten audio mic. I need to get some better monitors to really hear the DA in its full glory.
Got RME today and was disappointed. The power delivery looks very dodgy. The way it turns on. Amount of random contstant feedback when you simply plug it into the speakers until power on. Noise floor.... Also the highs were very distorted which kind of surprisingly goes inline with what Jack mentioned. Damn idk maybe I got unlucky but my uac-232 & ssl2+ interfaces sounded much better. I would double check RME units before settling on them.
@@veritas7010 wow that sucks. I did get some weird audio glitches once with the RME but that’s happened with all of those interfaces. For the most part it was fine. I just don’t think the conversion was for me, the highs can be a little crunchy and digital sounding. What interface are you trying next?
@@jacksp8de yeah I tried a second unit, conversion is just not there. You are the first channel who honestly is spot on with the UCX II review. Thank you so much! I would bet their DACs are better but getting a UCX II + dac combo with ESS chip from the same brand goes inline with the prices of just regular rack units, at this point might as well just get UAD 6x or something for good baseline conversion + I/O
I totally agree when you said there is no best. It depends on what you are looking for. Does it serve the purpose that you need to finish your production? They’re all great upgrades from the lower budget interfaces and some of those are even good but it’s definitely a difference when you step up you can do more things you can bring your outboard gear into effect and things like that. Also, some of these interfaces like the Apollo, you can use your plug-ins in real time I can only imagine what the step over these would be like.
Yes the cork sniffing is really not necessary. I just went down a rabbit hole and wanted to know for myself. The x4 won for me because I have an X6 to pair it with so I can use outboard gear. If I was purely recording and wanted to be minimal I would actually go for the apogee because you can bypass the mic pre and the conversion is amazing
The Neumann sounds nice!!! Followed by the Symphony and Apollo. It's a toss up between those two for me. The Rme was my least favorite. I have an Apollo X 6 and I love it. I have a Newton channel and the Atlantis also. Dope content Bro.
Yup! You have the same vocal chain I got and yeah man the sound is so good. I do like the preamps on the Apogee better but the Apollo user experience is hard to let go.
The playback from the apogee is crazy. The A to D id give to neumann tho with the apogee being a close second. I feel the apogee has more depth mixed with clarity over all of the others. It has a great balance to it. Clear but not too clean and warm enough to add whatever else you want in the mix vs having to eq mud out. I will say the apollo twin x is great bang for your buck tho. im team symphony desktop right now man, it just works and you can use it with any system including a ipad which is crazy! The rme always sounded to clean for my workflow but its nice. Iv'e owned the MT48 and i did like it but i was a little underwhelmed with it for the price when it came down to workflow, The sound from the mt48 was surgical which is great for mixing if you just want that flat sound with no vibe, it translates well. The symphony however changed the entire vibe of my studio. From my monitors to the mic input. I love it.
@@Lanatemusic Yeah I like that the Apogee is warm and has the clarity and separation. It’s sort of like an in between mt48 and Apollo. I do like the preamps of the mt48 a lot but the D/A is very clean and almost to wide. It’s like the soul is gone. I think highs are darker as well.
@@jacksp8deyep that’s my exact thoughts 💭 on the mt48 preamps are definitely crazy but overall unit for me was a little hard to get a vibe. it literally does nothing for the music other than provide a transparent signal for both the ins and outs which is great for a mastering pro user. The apogee on the other hand does something similar but in a more musical way. I like also like the emulation apogee has built into it even though I use external preamp. it’s also class compliant like the mt48 so I can use it with my older protools rigs and even windows 🪟 which is crazy. The used prices on the symphony also makes it a no brainer. I was able to send my mt48 back get the apogee and some extra monitors on the used market . Don’t feel like I lost anything quality wise honestly. Mt48 is definitely the more pro unit though no doubt but for my needs the apogee is the sweet spot for mastering grade quality and home studio vibes.
@@Lanatemusic yup you make great points. I think the preamp is actually colored on the MT48. It makes the vocal sound alive and is clear but the highs seem muffled. It’s missing the high airy sound of the Apollo and Apogee. It still sounds good though. Apogee sounds warm and musical yet very clean as well. The Apollo can sound a bit congested in the mids sometimes, seems like I do more eqing but it has that oomph and that air . The apogee is the sweet spot even though the build quality could be better. Sometimes I feel like I should sell everything and get a Symphony mk2 SE lol
@@jacksp8de that’s my untilmate goal too get the big symphony but my pockets ain’t agreeing wit that. The symphony desktop sounds close enough for me ,although I’ve heard people say even the older symphony and the mk2 is a step up but compared to everything else in its price range and some even cost more it puts up more than well enough of a fight . Now if they drop a 2nd gen desktop ima definitely be all over that. That mt48 vibing tho 😂I was planning to sale some stuff to keep it but it wasn’t worth that sacrifice. How the symphony ? It’s hard for me to get rid of that. The quality jump up from my x was crazy as far as the width and depth of the overall mix. Now the Apollo did have similar top end but much more warmth in the low mids which most people cut out anyways. So my mixes improved a lot with symphony. It was scary hearing the difference. It’s like 1080 vs 4k. Most people thought I changed my whole setup 😂 😅
@@Lanatemusic Thats wild. Yeah I have to EQ the Apollo a little more. The low end can be a little murky lol. I'm debating on keeping the mt48 or getting the SD back. I just watched a video where Leslie Brathwaite uses the Apollo to mix WAP and Happy, so I think it's good enough, especially for hip hop and pop.
Symphony was the most musical. RME did sound a bit "sharp". Neumann was boring sounding- albeit accurate (just like their monitors) Used to be an Apollo twin user. I rock with BLA now. Great for the $
Apogee MKII SE smokes the Neumann but not by much. AVID MTRX II is still the best converters that are very transparent. Apollo LOW end is definitely not tight like the Apogee
Hold on, hold on, hold the hell on! How you gonna say "SMOKES" and then follow that up with "But not by much"?!? What the hell? LMAO!! Comments just reckless!🤣
@@jacksp8de coming your way bro. I’ll email you bro
2 місяці тому
No one is talking about how great his rap and punch is 🔥. Man please keep making music, we need more of your songs. I will be checking it out streams. By the way have uiu tried antelope zen q and zen Quadro? Please check them out
Thanks man!! I do it more for fun and branding purposes but comments like yours definitely make me want to take it more serious. I haven't tried any antelope stuff. Maybe I'll get something in. I want to try the rack mounted one.
2 місяці тому
@@jacksp8de wow, that's cool to hear, please take the music serious, you are too good to let it waste. I know sometimes the process will wanna make us feel like it's too late but just keep dropping and add some promo to it too. You good for 💪🏾🔥🔥
I appreciate that! I plan to release more just so I can show my audience how it’s done. I just been focused on other things but I’m a student of business and marketing. I wear a lot of hats. Im into film music and comedy as well. I’m a jack spade of all trades. Thanks for the encouragement though. I needed to hear this.
Excellent video, mate! Glad I found your channel. New subscriber. I'm not a music engineer or producer. I just love listening to great music and playing games on my PC. I have a pair of the Adam A7V + SVS SB3000 sub running through an Apogee Duet 3. Everything sounds great, but my Duet has failed twice. After the 2nd repair, I decided to look for something else. The devices you tested are a lot more $$ than I'm ready to spend, so I'm looking more towards stand-alone dacs. Since I don't create/record any music, an audio interface probably isn't quite right for me, anyway.
Thanks for that!! I really appreciate it! Funny your name is mad max, I got a song called Fury Road. Man sorry to hear about your apogee troubles. Maybe you should just get an Audient interface like an ID4 since you’re not recording. I’ve heard good things about the new personus quantum as well.
thanks for video!!! RME is the best.... - neutral conversion "as it is", - best routing\mixer software, - best driver and support of all time. - (!!!) best round-trip latency performance (2 or 3 times better than any competitor!) - you can track real-time in daw with plugins with small buffer size without any problem (!!!) - thats why with RME you do not need any "built-in" (aka UAD) plugins. - i know that people dont like RME just because it doesnt have this "fancy vibe look" and "feel" ... but honestly it's just in our mind... technically RME is much better than other interfaces. - you forgot to notice room and headphone correction feature on RME (its so important for serious mixing and production) thanks man! good luck! with love, from Russia! sorry for my funny English))
@@jacksp8de thank you! i forgot to mention one more point about RME - its clock technology is much much better than anything else. SteadyClockFS. Most of other interfaces use generic "okay" clock)) quality of clock is so important for conversion and sync)
I’ve had all the brands. Hands down RME IS KING 👑
@@hayesbrotha I hear ya. Thanks for watching
I don't think so. Mytek 8x192 is king. Neumann is the new prince. Crane Song Avocet II is great also as is Burl. RME is not even a duke. It's maybe an ayatollah but that's the best it can hope for. Great review by the way.
Burl is Emperor 👑
@@bubz75 I don't like Burl converters, but love Crane Song Avocet II - and what now? :D
@@hayesbrotha
I use a RME ADI -FS pro AD/DA & Motu Ultralite Mk 5. Sonically they sound similar to my ears , I wound gladly trade them both in for a Burl
Bomber B2 interface .
Out of my price range ☺️.
RME is rock stable. Best drivers, period. especially for pc. they make their own from scratch. they still support and update drivers for products they discontinued decades ago. Plus totalmix is a game changer. I have 3 rme interfaces, adi2 pro fs r, babyface (original), and HDSP 9632.
Yeah I know about the rock solid drivers and everything. It's just not as user friendly to me. I'm sure total mix is a game changer when you learn it. I didn't have enough time.
Got RME today and was disappointed. The power delivery looks very dodgy. The way it turns on. Amount of random contstant feedback when you simply plug it into the speakers until power on. Noise floor.... Also the highs were very distorted which kind of surprisingly goes inline with what Jack mentioned. Damn idk maybe I got unlucky but my uac-232 & ssl2+ interfaces sounded much better. I would double check RME units before settling on them.
@@veritas7010 sounds like a defective unit, return it
@@veritas7010I have an UCX II for some time without any of the problems you referred. Maybe yours is unfortunately damaged. I believe you should try to change it.
1. Neumann
2. RME
3. Apogee
4. UAD
I had the Neumann MT 48 and UAD Apollo X6, X8 and some Twins back in 2021 in my studio. But back to 2024 the Neumann MT 48 came out on top as absolut king in my testing and stayed as main interface for my studio.
Order correct is:
1. Apogee.
2. Neumann.
3. RME.
4. Apollo UAD.
😎🫡
@@user-xowo3vxy92b73h I like the Apollo SOund more then the RME. But Apogee is Nr.1 for sure.
I’ve owned all of these. I work at Sweetwater so get to test them extensively. The Neumann MT48 is far and away the best sounding converter and interface overall. The preamps are not adding any transformer or tube style harmonic saturation like I normally prefer from my BAE preamp but they still sound incredible. I normally like using an RND RNHP headphone amp, but the MT48 has one of the best sounding headphone amps I have used.
@@jordangunit3078 I agree. I had to keep that one! It was too clean for me at first but once I got adjusted to the sound I couldn’t go back to the Apollo. I use it with the RND Newton channel and it warms it up and adds some saturation. I connected it to my X6 through ADAT for recording so I can use the mt48 conversion before it hits the Apollo. Then I can use the real time UAD plugins. Best of both worlds.
@@jacksp8de agreed! yeah I kept my UA Apollo on the side for the same reason. I could easily just rock a UAD satellite too to support plugins but the extra IO is nice. In the future, I do think I’m
Going to go all in for the Merging Hapi and connect the MT48 over AES 67 for high channel count but it will be expensive so the Apollo stays for now. RND newton is killer as well. Has their transformers and excellent signal processing.
@@jordangunit3078 Yeah I have an x6 and x4 and was thinking of selling the x4 but Im selling that DSP power too. I like having 10 Processors for mixing. The Merging hapi sounds incredible from what I heard online. I'm so good with current setup though. Testing some Neumann KH120s right now and this is it. I think I'm going to buy these and I'm good.
I have listed to. huge amount of reviews, I am only interested in the sound, and most them hardly mention this. All the other stuff is straight forward if you don't know how to run an interface you must be a novice, so how does it sound
if your doing a sound test and I am listening on my apogee duet 2 do I hear the true sound of the test
OOOOH I was waiting for this comparison, Great review! Have to try them all out.
Yessir!! Thanks for watching!!
Love your review! Opinionated, well argued, and focused on real world aspects rather than pure specs. Thanks for sharing the audio files!
Thanks man! That means a lot. I put a lot of effort into these videos and I’m glad it resonated with you. 🙏🏾
Elephant 🐘 2 stepping on bubble wrap had me 😂😂😂😂😂. Another dope video bro!!!
LMAO I forgot I said that lol thanks for watching mane
In terms of sound quality, these are what I find on each of them from most to least favourite:
Neumann = immersive
Apogee = pristine
Apollo = natural
RME = transparent
I enjoy producing on my Apogee SD but when I mix on it, it can be a bit too pleasant sometimes. It translates well but at the same time also brings emotion in the translation which can be somewhat distracting when you try to be critical. I’m not saying it’s colored. It’s transparent. The sound is full and in 3D in a good way.
I don’t know, man. May be I need a pair of speakers which are quite clinical to compensate on it. 😂
I like your ranking. You put into words how I’ve been feeling about the SD. It sounds almost too good lol I feel that way about Neumann too except the separation can be a bit too much. The Apogee has the best preamps. Hold on to that SD. I sold mine and I regret it
When it comes to the best A/D converters, I think Apoge is the best for my taste (when it comes to music). Yes, the Neumann is a touch (maybe 10%) cleaner, more detailed and more “natural” sounding. But the Apogee has a fullness, breadth, musicality, a roundness that sounds very, very beautiful and is still EXTREMELY high-resolution. Since we make music and don't measure speakers, I find the Apogee much more suitable.
@@rtdrec I would agree with that. I chose to keep the Neumann but it was a hard choice. I love the apogee sound.
i own an rme ucx ii. i have researched all of these. for anyone interested definitely do a deeper dive into your research and what your needs are. The rme is probably the best interface of the four. it probably has the best clocking and the best conversion and its suppose to sound completely transparent with no coloration. totalmix software gives you the best routing and you get the most features. but to each his own...hopefully you do your own additional research because these are not cheap interfaces.
@@ITSYABOYDONTE Respect. I actually like the sound of the RME. It’s a great interface for sound designers with a lot of hardware synths.
I owned Prism, Apogee, RME, Antelope, Focusrite, Audient etc….
Prism Sound sounds the best.
RME works the best.
Nice, would like to try a Prism Sound. Thanks for watching
Fire Video as usual fam! If you're a person that travels a lot or want to be as portable as possible think about the RME Babyface Pro FS as well. It's Bus Powered and has INSANE stability and low latency on both Mac and PC. It replaced my Apollo X4 due to stability issues on Windows and it's size when traveling. It's also half the price of these. Personally if I drop around $2k it'll be to upgrade my Rack Mount Interface in my home studio.
@@v3zMedia thanks for watching bro. I know you didn’t like the x4 because you can’t bypass the preamps. I can bypass the preamps on the X6. The x4 is a monitor controller and extra dsp. I might sell it though. A rackmount would be the way to go I want a Symphony Mk2 SE
from what I could hear from both tests is that my favorite out of these is the RME. It doesn't have the depth as some of the others put it's the tightest and most pleasing to my ears. I'm currently using a Lynx Hilo and I'd strongly recommend checking one out if you haven't already.
@@sandyhollowstudio It so interesting how we hear differently. I find it a little plastic and I like the organic smooth sound of the Apogee the best. I would love to try the Lynx Hilo as well as an Apogee Symphony SE
Basically, RME's D/A lets you wake up and step out the door in your pajamas with your hair undone and no make up, just dead honest. While the other three insist on fixing your appearance at least a touch before letting you out the door - each to their own taste...
I want to be able to at least brush my teeth and put on a decent outfit first 😂
@@jacksp8de 🤣 100%. There's a real difference between "natural" and "unkempt"
best video I've come across for a general understanding of these interfaces
Oh wow that’s cool. Glad I could help! Thanks for the comment!
This was the video I needed to see! 🔥
@@SoundBySavii Nice!! Thanks for watching!
Awesome video with lots of information. Great deal of effort and work went into it. Highly appreciated 🙌🏾.
Glad you enjoyed. Thanks for watching!
the Apogee and the Neumann have the best sounding converters
@@richardgordon9939 I agree! Thanks for watching
Amazing. My favorite is :
For Vocal:
1. Apogee
2. Neumann
3. RME
4. UAD
For Monitors :
1. Neumann
2. Apogee
3. UAD
4. RME
I have a UAD SOLO and I'm thinking of going for the APOGEE, because the sound it delivers is everything I like.
Thanks for this amazing review!
Great choice!! Thanks for watching!
yea, apogee clearly wins
Thanks for doing this comparison! This was awesome
@@ianbee1959 Thanks for watching and for the comment!
I bought last year a used RME FireFace UCX 1 for 630€ and im sooo Happy with this Interface, TotalMix is also wonderful (Once you understand it, it's like riding a bike) .
That was the best decision in my life, ngl
@@chronex. everybody loves RME. I wish I did. I may five the UCX another shot
Its interesting how the neuman sounds very different to all the others , it almost sounds like mono , and you hear that in the vocal and clap .. Im my opinion the Apogee sounds smoother and most balanced ... Great review Jack
Thanks for watching! Yeah it does sound very different but in a good way. The Apogee is amazing though. My fav preamps
I love the Apogee. I've compared it pretty extensively against the Apollo and some against thr Neumman, but the biggest difference to me is the highs and lows. The Apogee doesnt hype them like the Apollo does and gives a more true to life sound. When I do the car test now, I pretty much hear exactly what I heard in the studio.
@@outlawedbeats Yeah the Apollo has more forward midrange. The apogee has that clarity for sure but still has a warmness. Very pleasant to listen to for a long time.
Thanks for this brother. I have been looking for a review for Neumann vs Apogee for sometime now and this was insightful
@@XolaniNaku you’re welcome. I was looking for that too and couldn’t find anything so I just did it myself. Glad it was valuable for you
A to D very close
For D to A
1.RME
2.Neumann
3.symphony
4. Hard last Uad X4
I respect it. Everybody got their own list. Thanks for watching
@blasegangbeats1865 Spot on .
I'm sorry but I listen to comparisons but I'll keep my Focusrite
@@blairchatmon3612 yeah I wouldn’t upgrade don’t fix what’s not broken
love the vid, just throwing this out there, those jacks that accept both xlr and 1/4" inputs are commonly called combo jacks. Just in case you do more of these, which I hope you do, maybe this tid bit will help you out. So I couldn't help but notice that all of the interfaces you reviewed were all desktop units, and none from the rack mount form factor, which, for under 2G it should be pretty easy to have some really top notch rack units in there, and a lot of them will have a lot more onboard preamps, commonly 8 mic preamps on the 1U rack unit interfaces. And there are a lot of good units like that from manufacturers like MOTU, Presonus, Focusrite, UA, Apogee, Lynx, um.....even Behringer, yeah i know, but they are slept on and not really that bad. I've gotten great recordings from an X32 more times than I can count. Heck, for less than 2G, you can get a x32 now, and a bunch of other digital mixing consoles that have built in USB audio interfaces that enable you to get really high simultaneously recording track counts an)d a lot more including DAW control and a live digital console for performance. I feel like your review is aimed at producers that are generally doing a lot of VST's and maybe recording a guitar or bass guitar one at a time, and then doing some vocal overdubs, maybe trying to get a few keyboards in to the computer, but for the people that are trying to record whole bands playing the song live, (which is 100% necessary for the right feel if you ask me, if you overdub everything it will loose something, every time, I wish that it didn't but it does) they are going to need at least 8 mic inputs simultaneously and ideally the ability to make 4 separate headphone mixes, one for each player. At l east 2 separate headphone mixes, one for the vocalist and one for the band, or one for the drummer that has the click and one for the rest of the band. These are the choices you'll have to make if you don't have the ability to have more than 2 headphone mixes. The nice thing about that RME that you showed, is that it has the ability to use all of it's outputs as separate headphone mixes, you would just have to hook it up to a decent headphone amp. And if you add more inputs and outputs via one of the digital inputs like the ADAT lightpipe input, then you can use all of those outputs as well. The mixing app RME includes in their software is really great for tracking live bands, but let's be real, RME is a top tier interface manufacturer. They ain't no slouch. Having said that, an X32 which you can pick up for around 1400 used these days, also has the ability to have 8 separate stereo headphone mixes because it has like 16 XLR outputs right on the back of it. That is not including your main XLR outs or the 8 quarter inch aux in and outs that you can use to route effects in your studio. Anyone that tells you that you can't get great sounding recordings from something like a x32 is just lying to you. The difference between these units is honestly miniscule, and more often than not, has more to do with how much they cost or how much the person telling you about it actually spent on it. The RME is rock solid and their software is highly capable and you totally get what you pay for, but it isn't going to sound that much better than an x32, which input for input is probably the cheapest option, I mean you get 32 simultaneous inputs and 16 simultaneous outputs with an x32, with a 32x32 usb interface with it, that means you can record 32 inputs all at the same time into your DAW, all for the low price of 2G as of today. And you get an actual physical console that you can use either for your studio or live, you can use to take with you to record live also. They even have an expansion card that allows you to record and playback 32 tracks at a time without a computer straight to an external hard drive or dual SD cards. You can just keep some big SD cards in there and anytime anywhere, just hit record and it's recording whatever is playing through the board, all multitrack without a computer attached. That's just too cool if you ask me. So if you want to buy into the UA Apollo ecosystem and get the benefit of it's onboard DSP so that you can track through their plugins in real time, then by all means, do that. And that might be the best option especially for the desktop producers out there who are just recording vocal overdubs every now and then and also oing a lot of other production work with beat machines, keyboards, and VST instruments. The Neumann is definitely geared towards someone that wants the highest quality inputs and AD/DA for the money but what brings it down is the fact that the RME has awesome converters on it too. They are known for that, Neumann makes great microphones and is brand new in the interface world, this is their first offering of a music interface, keep that in mind. RME has been making only audio interfaces and ADDA converters. That is all they do. And they are really good at it. So I wouldn't sleep on that interface, but it's probably going to shine for someone that wants to add an additional preamp with more inputs and outputs to it, and use it as a desktop controller too. Just my 2 cents or 26 or whatever cents...Peace.
Mannn I got too much ADD to read every word but I agree with what I read. Yeah I know those are combo jacks and Neumann is great, but mostly I did this video to show it really doesn’t matter which one you pick. You can make great music with whatever allows you to record.
Thanks for this! I have been on the fence about upgrading my Apollo Twin X. Like you, I love the workflow and the plugins. My main reason to upgrade would be for noticeable ad/da improvement, but I think from your testing these other units, the difference is so marginal and subjective. I’m gonna keep my Apollo Twin X for a while longer, and see what UA does on the next Apollo Twin and X4 release. Thanks again!
@@marvsowell684 You’re welcome! I can’t wait until UA comes with new Apollos, I have a feeling they will be at the top of the chain again.
Hmm.. very useful comparison. Thanks for doing this. RME is brutally honest, so it sounds a bit "colder" and more clinical, what may seem "brittle". The symphony has a beautiful balance across the frequency spectrum, kinda like the name implies, think classical music recordings, and maybe it ever so slightly gates quick attacks... The UAD has some of that similar "pleasant" sound, but you're right the bottom end is muddier, and just overall the image is less focused (we're of course splitting hairs, but once our ears 'zoom in', they can look like big hairs 😅). The MT48 is definitely the most impressive sounding - the image is very tight, and there's definitely a 'sound' or a color to it - not drastic, but it's there. It flattered the music the most it seems, bearing in mind we're only discussing the D/A right now. The bass is accentuated a bit, but not hyped, just super definite and there seems more "distance" in terms of frequency separation from other instruments so you can pay attention to each more easily, and it almost invites you to listen to separate parts at a time instead of listening to the whole, which of course you can (and will if you work on it regularly). You're right each one is plenty good to make great records... it's a time of great access to quality like never before
I agree. The pleasant sound is probably harmonic distortion. I feel like that can be good for AD but for DA you may want a more neutral sound for mixing or mastering. For production it’s just about what you prefer. I feel like the MT48 is neutral enough but still has that color as you say. RME sounds slightly crunchy to my ears more digital I guess. It’s hard to explain but it sounds like plasticky. It has a good sound tho just not as organic imo
All of these are going to sound great. The Neumann clearly has the edge on conversions with RME and Apogee closely behind it. When i went from my Apollo Twin X to my now RME UCXii there was a DRASTIC difference in clarity. I dont think the Twin X has the exact same conversion as the X4 though. I believe X4 is a dual path or something. Either way, RME is known for being transparent. Not adding or removing anything. That said some people perceive that as sterile or cold. Its what i want personally. Havent used Apogee. The Apollo workflow just wasnt for me even though i love the plugins. RME and TotalMix is my absolute jam. At this pricepoint honestly its all about which workflow you prefer.
@@LaminarSound yep it’s cool that we have all of these choices. RME wasn’t for me but the sound was good. I do hip hop so I like the harmonic distortion of Apollo but I switched to the MT48 because it just sounds so damn good but still keeping the Apollos for I/O and the console workflow.
I was an apogee user for years. Couldn’t keep them working. Great sounding, terrible software and driver support. Switched to Rme. Very clean, not colored like apogee, so I get the color when I mix. No problems since I switched!
I had an Apogee element and it sounded good but the software was buggy, then they end of lifed it. I do love that apogee color, but yes RME is transparent and you can add the color in. Thanks for watching!
Almost exact same story. The Duet I owned just wouldn't behave in terms of drivers. Bought the One as a headphone amp/converter on the go and Apogee refuses to support it with modern devices. RME not only saved the day with rock-solid drivers and firmware, but the level of transparency on my UCX was shocking compared to the Apogees.
Hi, thanks for this comparison, personally I have been using an X6 and a Twin X for about 5 years, I also have RME Babyface. All the interfaces are extremely top and sound really good. After that it will depend on what you want to do with it. I like the Apollo system and its Plugins, because in my opinion, when recording it is the closest to real studio conditions, but that's just my opinion. Luna is really fantastic in recording, yeah always the impression of working on a big analog console ...
@@scorpion-unitrap5452 I totally agree. The Apollos have a sound that is really good for most popular music. Alone Again is one of my favorite songs and it was done with just an Apollo and an SM7b. And I love Luna. Thanks for watching.
1- Neumann MT48
2- Apogee symphony
3- apollo
4- RME ( thinnest sounding to me)
Yep thanks for sharing and watching!
Are all of these better than the Focusrite 18/20 3rd Generation ??? I was looking at the rme to replace it but im wondering how much of a difference will it make ???
I've never used that interface so I don't know how much of a difference it would make. You have to figure out what about your current sound and workflow is not working and find the interface that solves that.
this was fire bro. thanks!
@@elevatormusikgroup Thanks man! I appreciate you’re welcome.
RME every single time. I'm using my RME Hdspe AIO over 15 years now with zero problems. I'm also a user of the RME UCX II and it's the best in class and beats a lot of 4-5k products.
Yeah RME is super solid. Wasn’t for me but I respect it. Thanks for watching 🙏🏾
Can you measure the SINAD of the analog in and outs of the four interfaces so that we can get an objective ranking of how good the sound is?
@@AlbinoTigerBarb I don’t really get that technical. This is more of a surface level overview.
Hey man, Thanks for your great review. became a new subscriber.
I just wanted to comment on what I think is one of the most important feature on the MT48 as the owner which did not get mentioned too much in the video. And it is the Audio Networking (Audio over IP) Capability of the interface.
Having native support to the AES67 means that it has the ability to grow its input and output to 128 ins and outs by using the virtual sound card on your computer and could integrate the MT48 into it.
You could also connect it to dante-enabled products such as Yamaha Rios for more analog inputs and outs.
You could convert the audio to SFP or madi and have a fiber cable deliver your audio to destinations only capable with such cable.
Clock syncing and working together with other devices such as media servers, lighting equipment and so on could be done via the network.
above are just examples of what could be achieved with audio over IP and it surely makes your studio a lot more flexible and expandable.
The prices might look a bit high for MT48 when you compare the interfaces you mentioned the video, but I personally feel that the audio over IP capabilities of the interface more than justifies the cost of the device.
Of course, I understand that many of the viewers might not need such a feature, and thus went over it briefly in the video. So please understand that I'm in no way trying to point fingers or criticize the opinions in the video and in the comment section.
Just wanted to provide extra context haha.
but anyways, thanks for your content and hope to see great content like this in the future as well.
Thanks for the info! I’m sure it’ll help someone. I knew about that stuff vaguely but since I never used it, and probably won’t for a while, I didn’t have the authority to talk about it. Thank you for subbing by the way!
i am confused in what should i get confused in between apogee symphony mk2 io and apollo x8p mostly recordng producing hip hop, funk pop and some classical projects as well mixing mastering and film mix and atmos in future suggest me buddy where should i invest
I don't think the Apollo does atoms? Maybe the x16 does. That one sounds better than the rest of Apollos. That said I would still go with the Symphony SE version.
I think all four sound good. What differences harmonically you hear could also be done with plugins. So I guess in the end, it comes down to Workflow, I/O that meets your needs the best, which one you think looks coolest for your setup.
@@Seraph137 I totally agree with that. The Apollo looks the coolest and I love the workflow but the mt48 sounds the best and still looks dope. I got the mt48 running into the Apollo
If you have to choose one for an ITB mix monitoring setup, what's the one you take? I'm looking for someth'ng not 'best sounding' in the studio but more about how mixs translates on other systems. Thanks💪
@@julienromeo7210 any one of these can do what you want. You’ll have to learn the sound. If you’re doing mostly mixing I would choose either the MT48 or the Apogee
@@jacksp8de Thanks! The Neumann is also my no1 choice but expensive...it's for a second setup, as I have a héritage ram 2000 in my main room and it's great. Some friends told me apogees are often 'flattering', so I prefer not to have bad surprises outside the stud💪
@@julienromeo7210 I get you. I think even though Apogee sounds super pleasing, it does translate once you get used to it. My mixes sound better on the MT48. I'm demoing the Neumann KH120s and I don't know how anything can sound any better.
@@jacksp8de Thank you, that's what I needed to know💪
Apogee Symphony is absolutely the BEST! Thanks for another confirmation!
WOW I AM SURPRISE, I HAVE APOLO X4 GOOD. HONESTLY THE 1st WINNER HIRE IS THE NEUMANN MT48 HAVE MORE CLEAR SOUND PRESENCE AND THE 2nd SYNPHONE. 3rd APOLO X4, 4th RME, this what i ear and feel in my Dr.Dre beatpro monster.
I agree! Thanks for watching!
Apogee for the sound so far is the best, the workflow apollo but the sound is the most important if you make sound better 😊
I love that Apogee sound! Thanks for watching
Great review 👏🏻👏🏻
@@danieleanzanello thanks for watching!!
Well I beg to differ, RME is very clear and controlled noise with great width. Other interface seems to add color to them but they also seems to distort sound quality. RME for me wins it. Thank for the vide
You’re welcome. I agree the others color the sound. I like that color or harmonic distortion. I am not primarily a mixing or mastering engineer though so I care about “vibes”
good review. there is an envelope of luxurious dynamic range that this level of box wraps around your notes that the $100-200 entry level boxes don't offer. something to strive for. btw nice sample track there, if that's you, that shows real talent imho, little bit of marvin weaving into the beats. and lovely lady as well, nice to see
Yes even though entry level stuff is very good these days, it does get a lot better. Yes that is a song I produced and rapped on. Thank you for the compliments and support. I’ll let wifey know too. 🙏🏾
Thanks for an honest opinion!
@@brucejoyce9934 no problem. Thanks for watching
My two choices are the apogee symphony to Neumann mt48 as far as sound quality goes. Id go with the Neumann for the features and more I/o than the symphony.
Thanks for watching! I sold the Apogee and I regret it. I’m realizing it has my favorite preamps
@@jacksp8de i told you you would, im still rocking the symphony , returned the mt48. Apogee to me was best bargain when it was on sale.
@@Lanatemusic Yeah that Apogee is fire. I may get another one but I like the mt48 a lot more now though. Sounds good with the Newton Channel
@@arirahimzadehthat’s what I’m currently using. On my channel my latest single “you inspire me “ was tracked with the symphony and u87 mixed on my genelecs. Turned out crazy
the wife test is amazing
@@waltervenicio4790 😂 I thank her because she was busy. I pulled her into my shenanigans lol
A good audio interface is not only about converters...it's also about workflow...
And uad wins hands down about plugins quality ! Most of very big professional studios have it... so, think about it, there is good reasons.
@@Ve8g Agreed, I’ll always keep an Apollo around
I am RME boy , buuut here i like Apogee's sound ))) Cleaner , Softer , and Warmer . if its real comparsion )))
Yeah Apogees preamps are amazing. Thanks for watching
UAD❤❤❤
💯 thanks for watching
They’re all amazing for the studio… if you work live a lot - RME is supreeeme
Cool thanks for watching!
I only care about high track counts, good drivers, up to 24 (expandable) IO and low latency @ 96k/24, but I’d like to explore more DSP
@@miekwavesoundlab Cool thanks for watching!
Your audio comparison isn't using the same vocal take or mic placement across all samples, so it's difficult to determine which one is better :/
The limitations of this type of test are many. I’m not super techy but I gave it shot. Thanks for watching!
RME no doubt at all. More I/O, never fails, drivers works rock solid, good sound quality, DSP (comps, eq, rev, delay). You can map and route it however you need. Great conversion. I have one from 2010, still works perfectly, still receive firmware updates from RME. No doubt in my opinion…
I respect it man. Gotta give it up for being reliable and hella flexible. It’s deeper but seems more complex. I imagine all RME users have androids lol
@@jacksp8de hahaha lol. Great video, bro.
@@WilSantanaMusic Thanks 🙏🏾
They all sound great with slight differences.
Most of the time the interface doesnt matter as you just want a clean signal with fast transfer and good conversion which most modern interfaces have. I would just get a uad volt with kali monitors instead of breaking the bank over minuscule differences personally 🤷♂️
I'm not mad at that. You have to do whats right for you. I make an income with music so I invest for high quality gear, because it makes my job easier. If it was a hobby I'd be fine with a much cheaper interface.
I hate to love Apogee because there are a lot of versatile interfaces (Apollo/ MT48) out there, but sadly don't sound as great in my opinion. Great review by the way, and even better tune. I don't listen to a lot of rap, but this a great song. Keep up the great work.
Haha I understand the love hate thing with Apogee. They have an amazing sound though. And thanks I appreciate the feedback! I am releasing more music soon. Thanks for watching!
RME is the boss vocals symmetry and are upfront and kind tight
@@Te-BiL I agree but also it felt a little less organic. Thanks for watching!
@@jacksp8de I appreciate it great content you did👊
@@Te-BiL 🫡 Salute to you!
Are the RME converters in this unit the same as UFXIII converters?....seems like they changed converters between the 2 units but I may be mistaken....FYI the reason I ask, I am looking to purchase the UFXIII that's not part of this review....sorry for being a little off topic!
I have no idea. I assume the new UFX has more updated converters. They probably explain it on their website
Ok looks like they have updated them based on the statement below on their website.
The Fireface UFX III is based on a newly developed analog and digital board. While the analog board offers, for example, DC-coupled analog outputs as well as new AD and DA converters with improved THD+N value, the digital board also enables interesting new features thanks to updated high-tech components.
IMO the best interface for under 2k is actually under 1k and it’s the RME BABYFACE
Nice, I heard it's a good one. I personally don't like using RME but everyone has their preferences
I had a very difficult time between these 4 cards and I chose the new and 5th option, MOTU 828 2024. Hey, how about checking it out?
I heard about MOTU never tried one. Do they have anything new out?
For me the winner is Neumann MT48. Hope to get it soon!!!
You’ll most likely love it. It’s what I chose although I use it with the Apollo
@@jacksp8de what about the Antelope Discrete 4 Pro, have you already compared the sound? I think the Neumann is in another category but Antelope is $1K less
@@YOLO-pj3hh No I never had an Antelope. Ive heard they have a great sound. They had software issues though so IDK if that's fixed.
I am an RME guy. Got a UFX+ and a Babyface pro FS. I mainly went with REI for the rock solid drivers and I know that we support my interfaces for 20+ years. And when you’re spending $3000 for an interface, that’s the way it should be. The fact that it sounds good is icing on top of the cake for me. And they keep on giving me stuff like the new room option and total mix FX.
@@darkmaer yes that’s awesome. I’m the kind of person that likes to upgrade to check out the newest things but I can appreciate that RMEs will last longer than my car lol
I have an RME and I love it. When first listeningen to it, I thought the sound was "thin", but that is because it is so clean as it has extremly low harmonic distortion. It is also very flat also in the high frequency range, which may make you think it has too much of it.
The other interfaces have varying degrees of extra harmonic distortion and as this is what we are used to listening to in modern music, I assume this is the reason you liked the sound of the other intefaces more.
If you record with the RME, you will have to add extra harmonic distortion later during mixing to get to the sound of modern music. With RME you get almost 0 harmonic distortion from the interface, so you can pick any type of saturation you like. Or leave it out completely for that extra clean and crispy sound. Your choise.
@@BengtSkogvall I recorded through a Neve Newton channel with silk so there was harmonics. It didn’t sound bad or anything. They all sound good, I just prefer the others. I like the apogee pres the best. RME is does have less color. I enjoy the coloration of the Apogee. It also has the lowest noise based on loop back testing that I’ve seen on other channels. Thanks for watching.
Exactly what I was thinking the RME is the best sounding interface with the apollo in my opinion the transients on the other interfaces doesn't sound smooth
@@nils2660 you gotta hear the others in person the apogee is super smooth, the MT48 is sharp but super clean, and you can change the filter in it and other choices are smoother. It has 4 settings
@@jacksp8de I know all of them it's a clear difference for me
@@nils2660 That’s what’s up! Appreciate the input
Thank you for the info
@@37records you’re welcome thanks for watching
I’m a RME Fireface guy myself
Respect. 🫡
10:55 I don't understand what the point of this test is. Unlike comparing multiple microphones, it must not have been easy to compare multiple interfaces. So if that's the case, it would have been much better to play the same audio recorded at the same location and compare the differences when recording the sound with each interface. Listing and comparing each waveform or spectrogram would have also been a good reference.
@@Tootluminary The point was to compare the preamps and analog to digital conversion. Like my homegirl Tina Turner used to say, I never do anything nice and easy lol and you wasn’t around with your suggestions when I recorded it so now it’s done. No regrets. Thanks for watching!
the apogee is the smoothest and most depth. all the others sound harsh in comparison. the neumann was alright
@@christopherpederson1021 apogee just came out with the symphony studio, looks pretty dope
RME for the win imho. I'm not gonna get sold on peer pressure and glitzy glamour......the stability on RME baby face pro FS makes me appreciate it EVERY.SINGLE.DAY
Hope someday I have the money to afford the UCX ii or III in the near/distant future
That’s cool! Thanks for watching!
End game I think for me is MT 48 > into UAD console via adat > back to MT 48 via adat. Best of both world with Neumann/merging conversion but can take advantage of UAD dsp which is still king of the hill. Expensive but not really if you your figure the price of the Neve Channelstrip or equivalent. Unconventional I know... 🙂
Yeah you right! It has to go into the MT48 first for the conversion. I’m going to try that
Still use RME pcie cards, nothing touches the latency figures they produce. But i understand the need for a breakout interface if your working with a laptop or small form factor pc.
That’s great when you find something that works for you. I heard they have the best latency. I monitor through Apollo Console and love the results
Antelope Audio ZEN TOUR Synergy Core - I wonder if anyone has any thoughts on this, I bought it 1 week ago, paired with HD650 (Sennheiser Headphones) and its just totally AMAZING from what I experience, hear.
@@SoundofGreim Nice! I never tried it. I heard it has great sound but problems with the software
@@jacksp8de They overhauled and remastered the software, fixed all bugs and honestly, its working like butter smooth.
what is your opinion about arturia audio fuse studio??wich is the best for vocalist?
I’ve never tried it but I have a feeling it’s high quality. Most are these days and I like Arturia as a company
Apogee Symphony Dsktop WOW⭐️🎤🔥💁🏾♂️
Apogee is 🔥 Thanks for watching!
If you thinking long term, RME is the goat
Yeah RME will survive nuclear holocaust lol
Copy-pasta, spent time typing it for another comment, thought why not
"Bit late, but had the DA shot out against the RME ADI-2 DAC FS R, and the Apollo Twin X, as well as many other like Motu M4, Arturia Audiofuse, older Apogee and the MT48 wins bar none, it's not even close, and on both the speaker outs and headphones. Which is surprising especially when it came to the RME, which was much more expensive price per channel, and has superior DA chip specs. It all comes down to implementation and neumann is one of the best at that. Also talked to a guy that has experience with lots of very expensive gear, runs a trinnov direct out for his studio, and he says the only converters that can surpass it are the super high-end rack mounted converters.
AD-wise it's the best I've personally tried, tho I've not done very detailed side-to-side comparison. The AD conversion itself is better than the built-in one on a Neve 88M (used the sends from 88M's pre), and miles ahead my old Arturia Audiofuse, which I thought was already really good. Specs wise the AD chip is higher spec'ed than the one in the Apollo Twin X, also a few voiceover channels had reviewed the AD.
For an audible grasp you can check out this vid by Jack Spade titled "The Best Audio Interface under $2000).
I'm obviously passionate about this interface as it has improved my working life so much over the past few months of ownership. The few downsides tho, are that I get freezes about 2% of the time (still records and plays, but settings are frozen until restart), it takes close to a minute to start up, and it runs rather hot and requires good ventilation."
Thanks for sending people to the video I appreciate that. After using the MT48 for a while I totally agree with you. At first I thought the highs were suppressed a bit because Apollo had more air with its AD but the MT48 is just more natural and a lot more open. I would say that the Symphony desktop has amazing preamps and AD as well and some may prefer it. I did until I spent more time with the MT48. I sold the Symphony desktop and sent back the RME and kept the MT48. Still keeping my Apollo X6 and using the MT48 as an AD converter by going out and into the Apollo through ADAT. I like using Luna with the real time plugins. I’m actually surprised how good it sounds. I may sell the X4 or keep it for the DSP, not sure yet. The Neumann is next level and sounds amazing with the Lauten audio mic. I need to get some better monitors to really hear the DA in its full glory.
I have all three except rme ...nuemann has that high sample rate aswell
Didn’t realize that about Neumann
how was u able to connect your chnnel strip to the mt 48 i thought the preamps couldnt be bypassed?
They are not bypassed but it's nothing to really worry about. Outboard gear still sounds great with it.
i use Neumann MT48.. For me BEST😍
@@cubaseman1487 Love the sound! Thanks for watching!
Universal Audio will always be my go to as well bro! Lot of flack coming from folks but they stick around for a reason.
Facts! They got staying power because the user experience is great.
Got RME today and was disappointed. The power delivery looks very dodgy. The way it turns on. Amount of random contstant feedback when you simply plug it into the speakers until power on. Noise floor.... Also the highs were very distorted which kind of surprisingly goes inline with what Jack mentioned. Damn idk maybe I got unlucky but my uac-232 & ssl2+ interfaces sounded much better. I would double check RME units before settling on them.
@@veritas7010 wow that sucks. I did get some weird audio glitches once with the RME but that’s happened with all of those interfaces. For the most part it was fine. I just don’t think the conversion was for me, the highs can be a little crunchy and digital sounding. What interface are you trying next?
@@jacksp8de yeah I tried a second unit, conversion is just not there. You are the first channel who honestly is spot on with the UCX II review. Thank you so much! I would bet their DACs are better but getting a UCX II + dac combo with ESS chip from the same brand goes inline with the prices of just regular rack units, at this point might as well just get UAD 6x or something for good baseline conversion + I/O
RME sounds the best to me but they all sound good. RME has a cleaner sound with a nice top end.
Nice thanks for watching!
I totally agree when you said there is no best. It depends on what you are looking for. Does it serve the purpose that you need to finish your production? They’re all great upgrades from the lower budget interfaces and some of those are even good but it’s definitely a difference when you step up you can do more things you can bring your outboard gear into effect and things like that. Also, some of these interfaces like the Apollo, you can use your plug-ins in real time I can only imagine what the step over these would be like.
Yes the cork sniffing is really not necessary. I just went down a rabbit hole and wanted to know for myself. The x4 won for me because I have an X6 to pair it with so I can use outboard gear. If I was purely recording and wanted to be minimal I would actually go for the apogee because you can bypass the mic pre and the conversion is amazing
The Neumann sounds nice!!! Followed by the Symphony and Apollo. It's a toss up between those two for me. The Rme was my least favorite. I have an Apollo X 6 and I love it. I have a Newton channel and the Atlantis also. Dope content Bro.
Yup! You have the same vocal chain I got and yeah man the sound is so good. I do like the preamps on the Apogee better but the Apollo user experience is hard to let go.
@@jacksp8de Facts 💯
The playback from the apogee is crazy. The A to D id give to neumann tho with the apogee being a close second. I feel the apogee has more depth mixed with clarity over all of the others. It has a great balance to it. Clear but not too clean and warm enough to add whatever else you want in the mix vs having to eq mud out. I will say the apollo twin x is great bang for your buck tho. im team symphony desktop right now man, it just works and you can use it with any system including a ipad which is crazy! The rme always sounded to clean for my workflow but its nice. Iv'e owned the MT48 and i did like it but i was a little underwhelmed with it for the price when it came down to workflow, The sound from the mt48 was surgical which is great for mixing if you just want that flat sound with no vibe, it translates well. The symphony however changed the entire vibe of my studio. From my monitors to the mic input. I love it.
@@Lanatemusic Yeah I like that the Apogee is warm and has the clarity and separation. It’s sort of like an in between mt48 and Apollo. I do like the preamps of the mt48 a lot but the D/A is very clean and almost to wide. It’s like the soul is gone. I think highs are darker as well.
@@jacksp8deyep that’s my exact thoughts 💭 on the mt48 preamps are definitely crazy but overall unit for me was a little hard to get a vibe. it literally does nothing for the music other than provide a transparent signal for both the ins and outs which is great for a mastering pro user. The apogee on the other hand does something similar but in a more musical way. I like also like the emulation apogee has built into it even though I use external preamp. it’s also class compliant like the mt48 so I can use it with my older protools rigs and even windows 🪟 which is crazy. The used prices on the symphony also makes it a no brainer. I was able to send my mt48 back get the apogee and some extra monitors on the used market . Don’t feel like I lost anything quality wise honestly. Mt48 is definitely the more pro unit though no doubt but for my needs the apogee is the sweet spot for mastering grade quality and home studio vibes.
@@Lanatemusic yup you make great points. I think the preamp is actually colored on the MT48. It makes the vocal sound alive and is clear but the highs seem muffled. It’s missing the high airy sound of the Apollo and Apogee. It still sounds good though. Apogee sounds warm and musical yet very clean as well. The Apollo can sound a bit congested in the mids sometimes, seems like I do more eqing but it has that oomph and that air . The apogee is the sweet spot even though the build quality could be better. Sometimes I feel like I should sell everything and get a Symphony mk2 SE lol
@@jacksp8de that’s my untilmate goal too get the big symphony but my pockets ain’t agreeing wit that. The symphony desktop sounds close enough for me ,although I’ve heard people say even the older symphony and the mk2 is a step up but compared to everything else in its price range and some even cost more it puts up more than well enough of a fight . Now if they drop a 2nd gen desktop ima definitely be all over that. That mt48 vibing tho 😂I was planning to sale some stuff to keep it but it wasn’t worth that sacrifice. How the symphony ? It’s hard for me to get rid of that. The quality jump up from my x was crazy as far as the width and depth of the overall mix. Now the Apollo did have similar top end but much more warmth in the low mids which most people cut out anyways. So my mixes improved a lot with symphony. It was scary hearing the difference. It’s like 1080 vs 4k. Most people thought I changed my whole setup 😂 😅
@@Lanatemusic Thats wild. Yeah I have to EQ the Apollo a little more. The low end can be a little murky lol. I'm debating on keeping the mt48 or getting the SD back. I just watched a video where Leslie Brathwaite uses the Apollo to mix WAP and Happy, so I think it's good enough, especially for hip hop and pop.
Apollo X4 sounds most like a record. The others sound great, but X4 is closest to radio ready.
@@tkelong3569makes sense because a lot of hit records were made on it. Maybe you’re used to hearing it. Thanks for watching
Hello. These monitors are not very good for testing audio interface data.
Too late lol I’m planning to upgrade soon though, care to donate to the cause? 😁
Symphony was the most musical. RME did sound a bit "sharp". Neumann was boring sounding- albeit accurate (just like their monitors)
Used to be an Apollo twin user. I rock with BLA now. Great for the $
@@skennymane Yes good points! Thanks for watching.
Apogee MKII SE smokes the Neumann but not by much. AVID MTRX II is still the best converters that are very transparent. Apollo LOW end is definitely not tight like the Apogee
agree bro but rme destroys all of them
The Apogee MKII SE is my Dream interface. The desktop converters are from the regular Symphony but I’ve heard it doesn’t sound as good.
Hold on, hold on, hold the hell on! How you gonna say "SMOKES" and then follow that up with "But not by much"?!? What the hell? LMAO!! Comments just reckless!🤣
Bro you jive flowing. Need you on one my tracks..
Thanks man! Send me something!
@@jacksp8de coming your way bro. I’ll email you bro
No one is talking about how great his rap and punch is 🔥. Man please keep making music, we need more of your songs. I will be checking it out streams. By the way have uiu tried antelope zen q and zen Quadro? Please check them out
Thanks man!! I do it more for fun and branding purposes but comments like yours definitely make me want to take it more serious. I haven't tried any antelope stuff. Maybe I'll get something in. I want to try the rack mounted one.
@@jacksp8de wow, that's cool to hear, please take the music serious, you are too good to let it waste. I know sometimes the process will wanna make us feel like it's too late but just keep dropping and add some promo to it too. You good for 💪🏾🔥🔥
I appreciate that! I plan to release more just so I can show my audience how it’s done. I just been focused on other things but I’m a student of business and marketing. I wear a lot of hats. Im into film music and comedy as well. I’m a jack spade of all trades. Thanks for the encouragement though. I needed to hear this.
RME hands down ‼️‼️‼️ not even a comparison
RME has a loyal customer base for a reason. Thanks for watching man
@@blvkqmusicgroup nah, RME is the last on my list. Too thin sounding.
@@Circharles if by thin you mean clarity…🤷🏾♂️🤷🏾♂️
@@blvkqmusicgroup by thin i mean no body. Lows and low mids arent there.
Excellent video, mate! Glad I found your channel. New subscriber. I'm not a music engineer or producer. I just love listening to great music and playing games on my PC. I have a pair of the Adam A7V + SVS SB3000 sub running through an Apogee Duet 3. Everything sounds great, but my Duet has failed twice. After the 2nd repair, I decided to look for something else. The devices you tested are a lot more $$ than I'm ready to spend, so I'm looking more towards stand-alone dacs. Since I don't create/record any music, an audio interface probably isn't quite right for me, anyway.
Thanks for that!! I really appreciate it! Funny your name is mad max, I got a song called Fury Road. Man sorry to hear about your apogee troubles. Maybe you should just get an Audient interface like an ID4 since you’re not recording. I’ve heard good things about the new personus quantum as well.
@@jacksp8de Thanks for the suggestions. I'll check'em out.
thanks for video!!!
RME is the best....
- neutral conversion "as it is",
- best routing\mixer software,
- best driver and support of all time.
- (!!!) best round-trip latency performance (2 or 3 times better than any competitor!) - you can track real-time in daw with plugins with small buffer size without any problem (!!!) - thats why with RME you do not need any "built-in" (aka UAD) plugins.
- i know that people dont like RME just because it doesnt have this "fancy vibe look" and "feel" ... but honestly it's just in our mind... technically RME is much better than other interfaces.
- you forgot to notice room and headphone correction feature on RME
(its so important for serious mixing and production)
thanks man! good luck!
with love, from Russia!
sorry for my funny English))
Thanks for the info! It was just so deep and I didn't have enough time with it. Thanks for watching!
@@jacksp8de thank you!
i forgot to mention one more point about RME - its clock technology is much much better than anything else. SteadyClockFS. Most of other interfaces use generic "okay" clock)) quality of clock is so important for conversion and sync)
Love my mt 48
The Preamps are amazing
@@jacksp8de that and I can hear the slightest adjustments in eq and compression
@@waves7300 yup and the reverb tails and just everything is so clear
Drop the song
I do it for fun but I did release that one open.spotify.com/track/79vJH5B1RY1WnuJNQI24Uc?si=nmXF3PSKQQOUimFYauGO0A
@@jacksp8de thanks . This joint fire
Bro… all your gear is miles better than your monitors!
Yup, budget monitors, they are good but I'm getting some better ones soon.
Neumann mt48 is my favorite
It’s top notch. Thanks for watching
The sound related to rme was recorded in different acoustics.
It does but it wasn’t. I spent some time trying to figure out why it sounded so different. Could be user error not sure.