Could A Coordinated US Strike Beat The Russian Naval Fleet Near Odessa? (WarGames 36) | DCS

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 13 чер 2024
  • 0:00 Details
    7:08 FIGHT
    Ukraine-Russia Series:
    Fulcrum/Flanker vs Foxbat/Super Flanker: • Mig-29 & Su-27 vs Su-3...
    NASAMS vs Russian Cruise Missiles: • Could US-Supplied NASA...
    Russian KH-47M2 vs Polish Air Force: • Could Russian Air-Laun...
    Su-27 & Drone vs Snake Island: • Could Ukrainian Su-27s...
    Su-25s vs Russian Convoy At Kyiv: • Could Su-25s Penetrate...
    NATO Eurofighters vs Crimean AWACS: • Could NATO Eurofighter...
    Patriot, Gepard & Gripen vs KH-65: • Could Patriot, Gepard ...
    A-10s vs Russian Convoy At Kyiv: • Could A-10s Penetrate ...
    USN Tomahawk Strike Kerch Bridge: • Could Russian Su-35, S...
    USAF Stealth Strike Kerch Bridge: • Could USAF Strike Pene...
    Ukrainian Jets Strike Kerch Bridge: • Could Ukrainian Jets P...
    F-22 Raptors vs Russian Fighters: • Could F-22 Raptors Dom...
    Raptor/Eagle vs Super Flanker: • F-22 Raptor & F-15 Eag...
    USAF Bombers vs Mariupol Defenses: • Which Aircraft Can Pen...
    Ukraine Bombs Snake Island: • 2022 Ukrainian Su-27 F...
    Stealth Fighters vs Russian Bombers: • Could USA Operate Stea...
    Sinking Of Moskva #3: • Why The Moskva's Radar...
    Sinking Of Moskva #2: • Ex-US Navy Guys Specul...
    Sinking Of Moskva #1: • How Well Defended Was ...
    Russia Nukes Britain: • Could Britain Be Defen...
    Ukraine Uses Danish F-16s: • If Denmark Loaned F-16...
    Ukraine Uses Polish Mig-29s: • If Poland Loaned Mig-2...
    Russian-Britain Missile Attack: • Could Britain Survive ...
    Ghost Of Kyiv: • The Ghost Of Kyiv Comm...
    Belgorod Raid: • Belgorod Raid: Could A...
    Eurofighter/Fulcrum vs Super Flanker: • Eurofighter Typhoon & ...
    US Strike vs Odessa • Could A Coordinated US...
    Russian Helo Rocket Lob: • Can Helicopters Really...
    Russian Su-25 vs US Patriot SAM: • Could Russian Su-25s O...
    Understanding Russian SAMs: • Explained: Russian SAM...
    Ukrainian Jets Road Operations: • Could Su-27, Mig-29A O...
    Russian 40 Mile Convoy: • Could FA-18, A-10 Or B...
    Flanker vs Super Flanker: • Ukrainian Su-27 Flanke...
    SPONSORS
    Winwing: www.wwsimstore.com/STORE
    Winwing USA: fox2.wwsimstore.com/STORE
    Sponsor Reviews: • Sponsor Reviews
    USEFUL LINKS
    GRIM REAPERS(UA-cam): / @grimreapers
    GRIM REAPERS 2(UA-cam): / @grimreapers2
    GRIM REAPERS(Odysee): odysee.com/$/invite/@grimreap...
    GR PODCASTS: anchor.fm/grim-reapers
    DCS TUTORIALS: / @grimreapers
    DCS BUYERS GUIDE: • DCS World Module Quick...
    DCS OFFICIAL SITE: www.digitalcombatsimulator.co...
    ONE TO ONE LESSONS: grimreapers.net/one-to-one-le...
    DONATE/SUPPORT GRIM REAPERS
    MERCHANDISE: www.redbubble.com/people/grme...
    PATREON monthly donations: / grimreapers
    PAYPAL one-off donations: www.paypal.me/GrimReapersDona...
    SOCIAL MEDIA
    WEBSITE: grimreapers.net/
    STREAM(Cap): / grimreaperscap
    STREAMS(Other Members): grimreapers.net/gr-twitch/
    FACEBOOK: / grimreapersgroup
    TWITTER: / grimreapers_
    DISCORD(DCS & IL-2): / discord (16+ age limit)
    DISCORD(TFA Arma): discordapp.com/invite/MSYJxbM (16+ age limit)
    OTHER
    CAP'S X-56 HOTAS MAPS: drive.google.com/open?id=1g7o...
    CAP'S WINWING HOTAS MAPS: drive.google.com/drive/folder...
    THANK YOU TO: Mission Makers, Admin, Staff, Helpers, Donators & Viewers(without which, this could not happen) xx
    #WarGames #GRWarGames #NavalFleet #F22 #Raptor #B2 #Spirit #F35 #Russian #DCSQuestioned #GR #DCSWorld #Aviation #AviationGaming #FlightSimulators #Military
  • Ігри

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,1 тис.

  • @grimreapers
    @grimreapers  2 роки тому +9

    Ukraine-Russia Series:
    Fulcrum/Flanker vs Foxbat/Super Flanker: ua-cam.com/video/BhXfxc94JAU/v-deo.html
    NASAMS vs Russian Cruise Missiles: ua-cam.com/video/pJI_b95jzpk/v-deo.html
    Russian KH-47M2 vs Polish Air Force: ua-cam.com/video/cnrVxqL5q9w/v-deo.html
    Su-27 & Drone vs Snake Island: ua-cam.com/video/T_oRoU2Ayfo/v-deo.html
    Su-25s vs Russian Convoy At Kyiv: ua-cam.com/video/ryV65bUJzrw/v-deo.html
    NATO Eurofighters vs Crimean AWACS: ua-cam.com/video/EiJ2dFRh95g/v-deo.html
    Patriot, Gepard & Gripen vs KH-65: ua-cam.com/video/ZhxdrNjig1g/v-deo.html
    A-10s vs Russian Convoy At Kyiv: ua-cam.com/video/B0tZoo0uLh4/v-deo.html
    USN Tomahawk Strike Kerch Bridge: ua-cam.com/video/0vpi8xBygV8/v-deo.html
    USAF Stealth Strike Kerch Bridge: ua-cam.com/video/IJbf9Bcxnw0/v-deo.html
    Ukrainian Jets Strike Kerch Bridge: ua-cam.com/video/I8FumuZReB4/v-deo.html
    F-22 Raptors vs Russian Fighters: ua-cam.com/video/ComRcmrwJWk/v-deo.html
    Raptor/Eagle vs Super Flanker: ua-cam.com/video/keqYmuSEo-8/v-deo.html
    USAF Bombers vs Mariupol Defenses: ua-cam.com/video/aCsboOG0QU4/v-deo.html
    Ukraine Bombs Snake Island: ua-cam.com/video/BX696MKdkb8/v-deo.html
    Stealth Fighters vs Russian Bombers: ua-cam.com/video/rym90jnQDsA/v-deo.html
    Sinking Of Moskva #3: ua-cam.com/video/NIjoyIieOzY/v-deo.html
    Sinking Of Moskva #2: ua-cam.com/video/snjfbj_EwW4/v-deo.html
    Sinking Of Moskva #1: ua-cam.com/video/Bxwh6MGLJNc/v-deo.html
    Russia Nukes Britain: ua-cam.com/video/rzk45RFQwA8/v-deo.html
    Ukraine Uses Danish F-16s: ua-cam.com/video/17Pikrp0QaY/v-deo.html
    Ukraine Uses Polish Mig-29s: ua-cam.com/video/zCi4tAIzuOU/v-deo.html
    Russian-Britain Missile Attack: ua-cam.com/video/zwIGfabvzHA/v-deo.html
    Ghost Of Kyiv: ua-cam.com/video/Yrct8V4n1-U/v-deo.html
    Belgorod Raid: ua-cam.com/video/mQykTxt6ftw/v-deo.html
    Eurofighter/Fulcrum vs Super Flanker: ua-cam.com/video/MPyIipEhgR0/v-deo.html
    US Strike vs Odessa ua-cam.com/video/KeiOHgzic6Y/v-deo.html
    Russian Helo Rocket Lob: ua-cam.com/video/118GgGnP_sM/v-deo.html
    Russian Su-25 vs US Patriot SAM: ua-cam.com/video/asp69ZD_tO0/v-deo.html
    Understanding Russian SAMs: ua-cam.com/video/R4xTxLNZXcw/v-deo.html
    Ukrainian Jets Road Operations: ua-cam.com/video/hBpzQhinPbw/v-deo.html
    Russian 40 Mile Convoy: ua-cam.com/video/Vr_-2FLblBk/v-deo.html
    Flanker vs Super Flanker: ua-cam.com/video/VOAuOFLJGk4/v-deo.html

  • @philiphiggins6870
    @philiphiggins6870 2 роки тому +429

    Well apparently it only takes 2 Neptunes, a drone and maybe a convenient storm to actually sink a Slava.

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  2 роки тому +61

      Amazing.

    • @aig9672
      @aig9672 2 роки тому +22

      @@grimreapers Can you make an updated video with the current circumstances? Awesome video!!! Just found your channel, you have a new fan :)

    • @beba2893
      @beba2893 2 роки тому +5

      Storm was crucial in that story.

    • @EzioAuditore
      @EzioAuditore 2 роки тому +1

      It wasnt a convenient storm, god hates the russians as well

    • @kurtandersen8504
      @kurtandersen8504 2 роки тому +2

      😂

  • @alexdeeprose2303
    @alexdeeprose2303 2 роки тому +532

    Cap a few weeks ago: “We don’t want to do anything related to the real world events”
    Cap today: “Let’s sink their fleet lol”
    Great vid as always folks!

    • @blown533
      @blown533 2 роки тому +26

      this was a jab video because the "other" dcs youtubers haven't been respecting the same request that was made to Cap.

    • @ThunderChunky101
      @ThunderChunky101 2 роки тому +2

      Haha true. Wondered how long the ceasefire would last!

    • @ThunderChunky101
      @ThunderChunky101 2 роки тому +9

      @@blown533 It was a pointless request. Doubt UA-cam care, and I'm sure some military Intel are actually interested in these sims.

    • @thomaskosko1
      @thomaskosko1 2 роки тому +9

      Right, can't wait to see grim reapers footage on the news this week.

    • @finscreenname
      @finscreenname 2 роки тому +6

      @@blown533 What is this "request" made by you tube?

  • @njgrplr2007
    @njgrplr2007 2 роки тому +313

    After what we've seen in Ukraine, a couple of Turkish drones could take out the entire Russian Navy.

    • @AnonymousSandwich
      @AnonymousSandwich 2 роки тому +7

      You must be proud lol

    • @Cydonius1
      @Cydonius1 2 роки тому +45

      at this point, a drunk Russian sailor with a hammer could take out his own ship

    • @terjeoseberg990
      @terjeoseberg990 2 роки тому +28

      @@Cydonius1, According to Putin that’s what happened…

    • @danieparriott265
      @danieparriott265 2 роки тому

      @@Cydonius1 I still thing Slave just followed orders to "Fuck itself" ... a bit slow, but it got around to it.

    • @dylanrasmussen1552
      @dylanrasmussen1552 2 роки тому +23

      Pretty sure a flock of seagulls could take out the Russian Navy. The actual birds or the 80's band will work at this point....

  • @banba317
    @banba317 2 роки тому +56

    Now that the Cruiser is really sunk, the rest of the Black Sea fleet has had to disperse. In your simulation it took 64 bombs to take out the cruiser, taking into account what it could track and shoot down. In reality the Ukrainians "distracted" the crew of the Moskva with a few drones and took it out with only TWO Neptune missiles.

    • @c128stuff
      @c128stuff 2 роки тому +3

      From the image which supposedly shows it after the attack and before it went down, it looks like it didn't even try to engage the missiles launched at it.

    • @daniellewis1789
      @daniellewis1789 2 роки тому +1

      Granted that the sim overkilled the cruiser by something like 18+ bombs more than needed.

    • @Argosh
      @Argosh 2 роки тому

      @@c128stuff it does look likely they had a malfunction on their missile doors. They got hit and had an internal explosion.

    • @kevinimperati8644
      @kevinimperati8644 Місяць тому +1

      @@c128stuff if you haven't go watch Lazerpig's video on the Moskva. It was a pile of scraps by the time it left the harbor.

  • @brianplanchard5048
    @brianplanchard5048 2 роки тому +173

    This was prophetic. The Slava (Moskva) did sink to a missile attack. Though with a lot less missiles than DCS required.

    • @tylerclayton6081
      @tylerclayton6081 2 роки тому +1

      Real life shows how garbage the Russian military is. DCS overhypes their capabilities to an extreme extent

    • @JAnx01
      @JAnx01 2 роки тому +2

      How do you know how many missiles were fired?

    • @michagrill9432
      @michagrill9432 2 роки тому +11

      @@JAnx01 2. Tho big difference is this game has a basic hitpoint system as irl one hit to the ammo sotrage is enough to blow up the entire ship. As far as im aware ukraine used drones to distract the high power radar wich can only observe 180° and hit with 2 missikes as it only had a weaker 360° radar left

    • @JAnx01
      @JAnx01 2 роки тому +2

      @@michagrill9432 I've sen reports saying 20 were fired and 2 made it through the defenses.

    • @MrHombrelobo
      @MrHombrelobo 2 роки тому

      Yes I just scrolled back after watching this a week ago. Unreal.

  • @Restropect1
    @Restropect1 2 роки тому +125

    I end up binge watching your videos, even the hour long ones. I don't know what it is about your videos that keeps me glued to the screen for hours. Keep it up

    • @Uselessnoobcow
      @Uselessnoobcow 2 роки тому +4

      The excellent content provided to us by the glorious Cap of course!

    • @ThunderChunky101
      @ThunderChunky101 2 роки тому +2

      They're fun!

    • @johnporten8303
      @johnporten8303 2 роки тому

      Same here

    • @andrewwright.
      @andrewwright. 2 роки тому

      same...find them interesting

    • @myidisyou
      @myidisyou 2 роки тому +5

      I have the same problem I think it's his accent and his pompous nature which got me stuck on watching all of his videos.

  • @davidelliott5843
    @davidelliott5843 2 роки тому +103

    This shows the importance of assigning targets. It would also have been wise to use some of the B2 ordnance on the whole fleet, not just the Cruiser.

    • @metatechnologist
      @metatechnologist 2 роки тому +21

      This thing really needs a debriefing.and a redo imho. They shouldn't have lost the F22

    • @AgneDei
      @AgneDei 2 роки тому +20

      @@metatechnologist Also realistically, for air cover, anything less than 2 F22 and 2 F15's wouldn't make sense for such a big strike force. And obviously the simulation should be done at night. No one would send B2's for a strike during the day time. Also the B2's should be spread out during the attack, as otherwise, just from the bombs radar tracking info it would be very easy to send fighters in the right area after they dropped the bombs, and even potentially loosing those B2's would be a bad deal.
      It would also make more sense to hit the main ship with a couple jasm-er from even an F-16, and instead of the B-2's you could then use plain old B-52's to rain bombs on the rest of the fleet.

    • @TheMerlinmk19
      @TheMerlinmk19 2 роки тому +6

      Negative...the concentration on the cruiser was precisely how it should've been handled. IF that cruiser made it, this flight would not have and those landing craft would be hitting the beach

    • @c128stuff
      @c128stuff 2 роки тому +5

      @@TheMerlinmk19 agree... but reality turns out to be you didn't need B2s, or anything big and expensive to take out that cruiser, just a bunch of relatively cheap surface skimming anti-ship missiles.

    • @TheMerlinmk19
      @TheMerlinmk19 2 роки тому +5

      @@c128stuff the videos of Ulrainian farmers towing Rusky tanks away comes to mind😁

  • @005AGIMA
    @005AGIMA 2 роки тому +115

    "We weren't going to attack Russia but the powers at be annoyed us".
    Yeah....I think Ukraine just had the exact same thought.

    • @xtheory
      @xtheory 2 роки тому +3

      Typical Brit understatement. Love it!

  • @ebenitez2011
    @ebenitez2011 2 роки тому +39

    As of 4/14/22, The Ukrainians sunk that very same missile cruiser with a handful of antiship missiles, which leads me to believe they watched your video and studied it and implemented your strategies. Well done Grim Reaper’s!

    • @MrHerych
      @MrHerych 2 роки тому +7

      we sunk exactly the same cruiser

    • @danielwhyatt3278
      @danielwhyatt3278 Рік тому +1

      Yeah hope so. Lol. Let us see even more orc ships buuurn.

  • @JJustRandom
    @JJustRandom 2 роки тому +30

    Finally! Never let the "powers-that-be" dictate the art. Never.

  • @Trident023
    @Trident023 2 роки тому +6

    „One slava class cruiser…“ 😂
    I hear that ship has been renamed to “snake island memorial reef”

  • @douglassmith1215
    @douglassmith1215 2 роки тому +15

    One version of events is that the Bayraktars were distracting the Moskva cruiser while two anti-ship missiles hit. An alternative theory which I have heard is that the Neptune missiles drew the attention of the ship's countermeasures since that's the sort of attack they would know how to defend. The TB2s were supposedly just for targeting, but in fact they could also have dropped bombs that hit the on-deck munitions, setting off the explosions. The cruiser has good defences against large missiles but might not have anything against the little bombs that the TB2s can drop.

    • @douglassmith1215
      @douglassmith1215 2 роки тому +8

      A good clue that this alternative theory could be true is if the Ukrainians never release any drone video footage of what actually happened.

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  2 роки тому +2

      Interesting.

    • @tylerclayton6081
      @tylerclayton6081 2 роки тому +1

      @@douglassmith1215 Why would they release footage? That would give away their tactics

    • @c128stuff
      @c128stuff 2 роки тому +1

      There appears to be an image of the cruiser after it was hit and before it sunk. That image suggests 2 or maybe 3 hits on the side of the ship near the center, and at least no long range anti missile defenses having been active, which seems consistent with the missiles + distraction and/or adverse weather conditions theory.

    • @douglassmith1215
      @douglassmith1215 2 роки тому +2

      @@c128stuff Both long-range and short-range missiles seem not be have been deployed.

  • @normanmadden
    @normanmadden 2 роки тому +21

    Can we get an "A-10s released" onto the long Russian convoy; you know you want to see it.

    • @KKSuited
      @KKSuited 2 роки тому +4

      Some A-10s, an AC-135 and a pair of F-35s would probably handle that nicely.

  • @mikeymike1792
    @mikeymike1792 2 роки тому +32

    Based on their performance in the conflict so far, I hope those flankers were set to a low AI skill level.

  • @Whlz42
    @Whlz42 2 роки тому +57

    Coming back to this to absolutely laugh at the news that the Slava-class Moskva was badly damaged and abandoned today after being hit by a Ukrainian Neptune anti-ship missile.
    Your hypothetical mission was fun to watch, and I just had to verify it was the Moskva here as well.

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  2 роки тому +13

      Yes it was Moskva.

    • @PhoenixT70
      @PhoenixT70 2 роки тому

      Fun fact: _Moskva_ was the lead ship of the whole class, but they changed her name after the USSR went to the past tense. God only knows why, _Glory_ is an excellent name for a cruiser.

    • @NozomuYume
      @NozomuYume 2 роки тому +5

      @@PhoenixT70 Because they retired the Moskva (lead ship of a helicopter carrier class), and they didn't want to not have a ship in the fleet named after Moscow, so they renamed Slava. And I agree, Slava/Glory is a pretty awesome name.

    • @Wallyworld30
      @Wallyworld30 2 роки тому +5

      @@NozomuYume She just sank... goodbye Moskva!

    • @ladela7348
      @ladela7348 2 роки тому +2

      @@NozomuYume According to naval traditions, it's bad luck to rename a ship.

  • @Erik-ow8lq
    @Erik-ow8lq 2 роки тому +76

    2 B2's would've destroyed that entire force by themselves if they spread out their payloads evenly 😂

    • @kebbajammeh1645
      @kebbajammeh1645 2 роки тому

      Erik, you fuckin lying.

    • @justfun287
      @justfun287 2 роки тому

      Not 2. They’ve used a very low amount of missile interceptors in the war.

    • @AirRider44
      @AirRider44 2 роки тому +1

      I’d target 8 JSOWs at the Slava and 2 each at the larger surface ships AFTER the other B-2s targeted the fleet with 100+ SDB and AFTER the fighters then engaged with their HARMs and MALD decoys.

    • @wamnicho
      @wamnicho 2 роки тому +2

      @@AirRider44 you talk like as if the Russians would be sitting there doing nothing, believe me, NATO air force bases would be targeted.

    • @JohnWick-qr4yc
      @JohnWick-qr4yc 2 роки тому +4

      @@wamnicho ooooh so scary 😂

  • @tomsoki5738
    @tomsoki5738 2 роки тому +7

    Type 45’s can track *thousands* of targets at once. It can engage a couple dozen at once.

  • @adriaan7627
    @adriaan7627 2 роки тому +3

    The slava cruiser is that the Moskva? You can scratch that one now for sure 😝

  • @waynehankinson8210
    @waynehankinson8210 2 роки тому +3

    Funny how the video is much more watchable with the sound muted.

  • @AvnerSenderowicz
    @AvnerSenderowicz 2 роки тому +3

    Kortana Cam looks like the game F-22 Retaliator from 1990.
    Entertaining stuff!

  • @peterabel81
    @peterabel81 2 роки тому +5

    I just watched this video yesterday afternoon. Then the news broke out during night that the Moskva cruiser was hit. They didn’t even need those B2s for that. So it seems now it’s free reign over the Black Sea for air forces.

  • @jimkluska253
    @jimkluska253 2 роки тому +2

    Awesome!!! So glad you guys are doing this.

  • @castnoshadow82lr48
    @castnoshadow82lr48 2 роки тому +1

    I don’t have a gaming pc so I don’t play this game but I’ve found myself watching your videos I love the big battles

  • @walterpetrick5437
    @walterpetrick5437 2 роки тому +9

    Nice video, as most of the time..."leader of the pack", as most of the time: more enthusiasm, than competence, paired with realistic cowardness and humor ;) As long as "Cortana" (and others) help them, it seems, that they reach their targets. ;) Mixture of "Little Britain", Monty Python (just a flesh wound) and "serious" simulation. I love Grim Reapers! (strictly platonic!)

  • @WillM38
    @WillM38 2 роки тому +11

    The 35 can actually carry 1xAMRAAM and 1x2KLb bomb internally as well

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  2 роки тому +1

      thx doesn't work in game.

    • @WillM38
      @WillM38 2 роки тому +2

      @@grimreapers I figured. Just dropping some irl info since I built them for 3 years. If yall have any questions about them I'd be more than happy to help!

    • @vladimirivanov8743
      @vladimirivanov8743 2 роки тому

      @@WillM38 does F-35 have radar jamming capabilities?

    • @WillM38
      @WillM38 2 роки тому

      @@vladimirivanov8743 Yes. It can actually jam, run TWS, and SAR ground radar imaging all at once.

  • @trottheblackdog
    @trottheblackdog 2 роки тому +2

    Borat voice: GREAT SUCCESS!

  • @LanceZ
    @LanceZ 2 роки тому +1

    If they did this I would love to pull up a beach chair and watch the show. Also Scott should be known as "The Purple people eater"

  • @jan_07
    @jan_07 2 роки тому +21

    Thanks and great vid! Too many aircrafts lost against a cheaper Russian fleet though, quite not the American way of operating hehe. Their way is “fight unfair: if enemy bring guns, we’ll bring tanks” to minimize casualties. Those fighters would have been mostly composed of F35’s and some raptors for air protection. Cheers! 😉

    • @tarn1135
      @tarn1135 2 роки тому +6

      And raptors would be flying above to intercept any migs that come their way in addition to a much more overwhelming fighter and bomber strike.

    • @kelvinw.1384
      @kelvinw.1384 2 роки тому +6

      Yeah our model is honestly overwhelming force and power. We dont fight fair in power. We rather throw money then lives.

    • @jan_07
      @jan_07 2 роки тому +4

      @@kelvinw.1384 exactly! It will be a very bad day even losing just one American personnel in the battlefield. Also financially, one American pilot or soldier killed will cost the army more (in terms of training and opportunity costs) than losing one machine. Experience and skills are more expensive to lose than material equipment.

    • @oveidasinclair982
      @oveidasinclair982 2 роки тому +6

      War is not about fighting fair, it's about winning with minimum loses to your own side as possible.

    • @xtheory
      @xtheory 2 роки тому

      @@kelvinw.1384 Why fight fair when you can fight dirty and win?

  • @cheezeit1992
    @cheezeit1992 2 роки тому +8

    You should start adding links to your other channel mate, make it easier for people to find it. Great content, appreciate the work you put in

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  2 роки тому +3

      Link is in Vid description and end vid links. Not sure where else I can put them? ua-cam.com/channels/ZzvHfFzIpMrvgAbgZDUX9A.html

  • @ronniefarnsworth6465
    @ronniefarnsworth6465 2 роки тому +2

    Hell Yes !!!!!!!!
    We train for it !!!! Sgt, Semper Fi

  • @johnblue8907
    @johnblue8907 2 роки тому +8

    I've got COVID and this channel has been my salvation, thanks guys

  • @johngardner1290
    @johngardner1290 2 роки тому +4

    Everytime time I hear Cap say: " Get Some", I think of Duke Nukem.

  • @nick1635
    @nick1635 2 роки тому +5

    In reality it seems it didn't require 4 B52s, but a few Brave Ukrainians to sink the Moskva.

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  2 роки тому +2

      Always the way...

    • @nick1635
      @nick1635 2 роки тому

      @@grimreapers haha 😊 I'm glad I found your channel I really like your videos

  • @brianpercival1829
    @brianpercival1829 Рік тому

    FINALLY! One I can watch under 30 minutes.

  • @lennyjay8390
    @lennyjay8390 2 роки тому +2

    Instead of a million B-2s it actually only took one subsonic boi lol

  • @steveturner3999
    @steveturner3999 2 роки тому +12

    Is the Growler modeled in DCS? I wonder how effective they’d be in jamming the ships radar?

    • @tituslaronius
      @tituslaronius 2 роки тому +9

      it is not. there is more and more electronic warfare being implemented in dcs, byt the ea-18 is waaaay too classified to ever be a thing

    • @pogo1140
      @pogo1140 2 роки тому +3

      @@tituslaronius Not even sure if they will model the EA-6A which was last used in the 1970's.

    • @c128stuff
      @c128stuff 2 роки тому

      Turns out creative use of cheap technology was all that was needed to distract it, and kill it with a few subsonic missiles.

  • @mythicfour
    @mythicfour 2 роки тому +32

    Honestly if the B-2 salvo would've targeted each ship, you would've just had to clean up the rest with the fighter element no problem. Great strike, great video!
    Slava Ukraini!

    • @MrVDSky
      @MrVDSky 2 роки тому

      В срало урине

    • @Hewitt_himself
      @Hewitt_himself 2 роки тому +2

      2 B2s would of focused the corvette, once they fired enoungh to draw off the corvette the others hit each landing ship with 2 each then dump the reast in the covrvette as the corvette is the threat
      The issue is warships can recover from a hit or two... a salvo not so much

    • @jacobcooper269
      @jacobcooper269 2 роки тому

      Imagine thinking you're a good person citing a term used by Stepan Banderas' organization which was responsible for the rape, torture, dismemberment and immolation of 50,000-100,000 Polish people, most of which were women and children.
      You are the prime-example of the power Western-Media has in manipulating people into supporting outright egregious-causes on behalf of the special-interests which run their organizations.

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  2 роки тому +1

      agree but wanted to give the human drivers something to do.

    • @robvanwijk3085
      @robvanwijk3085 2 роки тому

      One B52 with 12 Harpoon anti ship missiles would have done the trick.

  • @AugmentedGravity
    @AugmentedGravity 2 роки тому +1

    Kortana the absolute chad she is flying in VR

  • @johnedwards3198
    @johnedwards3198 2 роки тому +1

    SERGEI feels left out!!! Ivan and Dimitri were well represented but #Justice4Sergei

  • @ronl2463
    @ronl2463 2 роки тому +12

    Judging from the Russian army’s performance a WW1 Air Force could defeat them.

    • @evan6034
      @evan6034 2 роки тому +1

      Ron, that goes for America as well,, the reason y Russia seems like they perform badly depends on who telling the news. furthermore Russia did not sanstion Ukraine for 12 years before they invaded, they did not put a no fly zone, they did not send in so called weapons inspectors to see what they were up against, the Russians dive in head first by themselves no Allies. America would flatten the hole country before putting one soldier on the ground. As for levensky he would not be running around asking for weapons he would be hiding, in jail, or dead.The Russians are nice.😁

    • @SineMacula
      @SineMacula 2 роки тому +4

      @@evan6034 🦧🍌

    • @evan6034
      @evan6034 2 роки тому

      @@SineMacula real talk

    • @campbell9825
      @campbell9825 Рік тому

      So you're saying that the difference between America and Russia is that Russia actually sends soldiers in to commit the war crimes personally. Wow, that's so much better

    • @ronl2463
      @ronl2463 Рік тому

      @@campbell9825 if you could read you would know exactly what I said, but you have to try to sound “educated” and inject your interpretation of what others actually wrote, get a life!

  • @MikooBo.
    @MikooBo. 2 роки тому +8

    Hell yeah, official "fuck it" levels achieved

  • @totalnerd5674
    @totalnerd5674 2 роки тому +3

    Glad to see modern naval ships in Wargames again!

  • @williambargo9498
    @williambargo9498 2 роки тому +2

    Two Neptune missiles: "Hold my beer."

  • @mrrexychomp9829
    @mrrexychomp9829 2 роки тому +5

    and of course the CIWIS ignored the missiles

    • @mrrexychomp9829
      @mrrexychomp9829 2 роки тому +1

      @SubtoPolecat324 it might have stopped enough to keep the ship alive longer

  • @SirMo
    @SirMo 2 роки тому +14

    How topical. Good job guys, and thanks for the laughs as always.

  • @pryanikfromrf4459
    @pryanikfromrf4459 2 роки тому +1

    Почитал комментарии и остался доволен.

  • @bojack3827
    @bojack3827 2 роки тому

    Great vid. This was more exciting than the Top Gun action sequences and the attack on the death star in Star Wars!

  • @robbarrett4038
    @robbarrett4038 2 роки тому +6

    All you need is a Turkish drone and 6 tractor's

    • @oladiedoo50
      @oladiedoo50 2 роки тому

      Lolll

    • @Wildfire86872
      @Wildfire86872 2 роки тому

      Someone needs to make some tractor mods for Combined Arms

  • @vd00
    @vd00 2 роки тому +9

    Cap looks suspiciously headless... otherwise a great show!

    • @ryanpayne7707
      @ryanpayne7707 2 роки тому

      No head means no contract assassin can headshot him.

  • @goolashnz6426
    @goolashnz6426 2 роки тому +1

    Haha . Had the doom soundtrack kick off as you and the lads started dropping bombs was a great little montage :P

  • @legionactual9281
    @legionactual9281 2 роки тому +1

    Finally! These are the best videos

  • @Bobbydyland
    @Bobbydyland 2 роки тому +10

    Video idea: Plausible deniability involvement in the war. Could a stealth aircraft destroy the Kersh straight bridge and remain undetected from the Russians.

    • @williamwchuang
      @williamwchuang 2 роки тому

      Sink them with a bunch of submarines.

    • @John-hu9qg
      @John-hu9qg 2 роки тому

      No they have digital VHF NEBO-M radars in crimea alongside the S400s powerful ASEA radars so no, they would take out the F35s for fun.

    • @Bobbydyland
      @Bobbydyland 2 роки тому +7

      @@John-hu9qg Is that what Russia claim? Cos... I'm a little doubtful of Russia's claims these days.

    • @John-hu9qg
      @John-hu9qg 2 роки тому

      @@Bobbydyland tested in Syria vs F35s

    • @Bobbydyland
      @Bobbydyland 2 роки тому +8

      @@John-hu9qg Citation needed.

  • @jeremypinson5880
    @jeremypinson5880 2 роки тому +4

    Now, Sevastopol. But include the S-400. Attempt to eliminate the entire fleet in one pass.

    • @JayantRaut
      @JayantRaut 2 роки тому +2

      Savage

    • @jonathanpfeffer3716
      @jonathanpfeffer3716 2 роки тому

      I really hope you still don’t think the S-400 is some magic system. Even going off of Russian manufacturers numbers, they are only going to get a firing solution at 40-50km or so on American 5th gens. American 5th gens that will be carrying ARM with upwards of 100nmi ranges.

    • @jeremypinson5880
      @jeremypinson5880 2 роки тому

      @@jonathanpfeffer3716 No, just want to simulate an attack on Sevastopol as accurately as possible. Since the 2014 Crimean attack was due to Russia’s attempt to maintain Sevastopol, it would be interesting to see if Ukraine could eliminate Sevastopol’s entire fleet, and thus the reason for the original conflict. If Russia no longer needs Sevastopol, why would they continue fighting?

  • @busslayer4790
    @busslayer4790 2 роки тому +2

    Seems that B2s are a bit of overkill to take out a RU cruiser. A couple subsonic cruise missiles can do the trick.

  • @ironmann16
    @ironmann16 2 роки тому +1

    23:24 when the first missile clips the stabilizer and you think "that was clo....BOOM" lol

  • @Wallyworld30
    @Wallyworld30 2 роки тому +3

    All it took to sink Moskva was a surface to surface missile and some bad weather! Goodbye Moskva! Official Russian Sources reporting that Moskva has sank!

  • @thomaz.869
    @thomaz.869 2 роки тому +20

    Russian fighters should have been spawned and started heading towards you the moment the B2's got detected
    And the ships would be moving wich would give gps a harder challenge.

    • @noth606
      @noth606 2 роки тому +5

      B2's are not detected much, that is the point. As aircraft they suck, flying wings are terribad.

    • @pogo1140
      @pogo1140 2 роки тому +4

      Ships that have powered down their engines don't spool them up that fast and even when they do get them up and running, they don't accelerate quickly

    • @marshalljulie3676
      @marshalljulie3676 2 роки тому +4

      @@pogo1140 It was basically a setup for an easy raid. Fun to watch though everyone needs to blow some steam off sometimes

    • @mrvwbug4423
      @mrvwbug4423 2 роки тому +5

      The B2s were never detected, the Moskva didn't go active until the bombs were in the air as the bombs have a bigger RCS than the B2s.

    • @user-qz2sw7pq8y
      @user-qz2sw7pq8y 2 роки тому +2

      jeah early warning radars dont give a f about stealth , also there are land stationed SAMs in the area, plus i think the cruiser in question had recived and updated air defense system .

  • @wesleyedwards2764
    @wesleyedwards2764 2 роки тому +2

    Hey, Putin. I see you got a slava cruiser down there with you.
    Putin: Yeah, that's right. We got a whole...
    Hey, Putin. That slava cruiser's not with you anymore.

  • @cathoderay305
    @cathoderay305 2 роки тому +9

    An amphibious ready group (ARG), led by an LPH flat-top and accompanied by an attack submarine could do it. Note that (1) an LPH can carry a number of F-35 VSTOL aircraft, (2) the ARG consists of 6 or more USN ships, and (3) attack submarines can carry both torpedoes and missile systems now.

  • @markstott6689
    @markstott6689 2 роки тому +5

    A very rewarding mission. Everyone except for Cap was strangely quiet other than during the discussion on the Grumpovitch family tree. Strangely no discussion of Yuri and Leonid Grumpovitch those well known blackguards of the Grumpovitch clan. Next time maybe?

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  2 роки тому +1

      Roger Mark, you can tell when the boys are concentrating...

  • @willwozniak2826
    @willwozniak2826 2 роки тому +2

    Them B-2s look beautiful.

  • @davequaschnick2559
    @davequaschnick2559 2 роки тому +1

    Only if you could get every sailor and officer to sneeze at once. Which would be a SNAFU. So Yes

  • @etherjoe505
    @etherjoe505 2 роки тому +3

    Why not a bunch of F15s with JASSMs ? Maybe put some F16 wild weasels ahead to deal with the AA first. Seems a lot cheaper than B2s

  • @cknewcomb
    @cknewcomb 2 роки тому +7

    SDB2 and LRASM are choice for this engagement. A group of B-1B's could have dealt with the Moskva easily.

    • @John-hu9qg
      @John-hu9qg 2 роки тому

      B1Bs.....🤣🤣🤣 the S400s in crimea would annihilate B1 bombers like it annihilated the bulk of the Ukrainian air force.

    • @tylerclayton6081
      @tylerclayton6081 2 роки тому +3

      @@John-hu9qg S400 🤣😂🤣😂🤣. Can’t even take out 1980s Mig 29s and TB-2 drones. Where’s the Moskva??? It’s on a special underwater operation. That garbage Russian flagship Can’t even defend itself from 2 Neptune missiles which are basically just copies of the American Harpoon.

    • @John-hu9qg
      @John-hu9qg 2 роки тому

      @@tylerclayton6081 where do I start with this level of retardation?

    • @vladraduandrei5227
      @vladraduandrei5227 Рік тому

      @@John-hu9qg this guy is botting hard...here s your 50 cents bruh

  • @TheBdesignz
    @TheBdesignz 2 роки тому +2

    Are the AGM-158s modeled/modded in DCS? they would be perfect for this

  • @MisteriosGloriosos922
    @MisteriosGloriosos922 2 роки тому

    Amazing vid!!!

  • @hoilst
    @hoilst 2 роки тому +6

    Doesn't this assume that Russian forces would be competent?

  • @kenhelmers2603
    @kenhelmers2603 2 роки тому +3

    Kortana's VR view looked weird! More bombing runs please :)

    • @alansnyder4104
      @alansnyder4104 2 роки тому

      Kortana was running CAP so the bombing runs could happen.

    • @KortanaDCS
      @KortanaDCS 2 роки тому +5

      Technical difficulties 😅. Thankfully I was able to resolve them today.

    • @kenhelmers2603
      @kenhelmers2603 2 роки тому

      @@KortanaDCS So glad! I was worried it was my eyes for a moment ;)

  • @professor-dad
    @professor-dad 2 роки тому +2

    Dudes! The Moskva (only dangerous ship) just "exploded" a few hours ago. No airstrike required. Seriously WTF?! The Russians are saying that a fire started onboard igniting ammo.

  • @shanebluebutterfly
    @shanebluebutterfly 2 роки тому +1

    "Powers that be don't care enough" I'd love to see you go fight

  • @Stinger522
    @Stinger522 2 роки тому +9

    Wouldn't a 2,000 pound JDAM blow those landing ships in half? I heard those things can bring down tall buildings by blowing out their structural supports.

    • @NozomuYume
      @NozomuYume 2 роки тому

      If the landing ships are full of munitions, pretty much anything can take them out if they can set off secondary explosions.

    • @bighands69
      @bighands69 2 роки тому

      @@NozomuYume
      Modern carriers cannot be sunk with a single blow.

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  2 роки тому

      agree

    • @Stinger522
      @Stinger522 2 роки тому

      @@bighands69 But those weren't carriers, they were troop transports.

    • @NozomuYume
      @NozomuYume 2 роки тому

      @@bighands69 Landing ships most certainly can, if you set off the munitions in the cargo. Unless you meant aircraft carriers, which these are not. They're ships designed to transport troops, tanks, ammunition, etc. to the shore directly. They can beach themselves and then a door opens in the front letting all the assets be unloaded directly onto the beach.

  • @oveidasinclair982
    @oveidasinclair982 2 роки тому +4

    If you ask this question to me 6 weeks ago I would most likely no, ask this to me today and I say the US would totally wipe out the Russian Norther Fleet; easily.

  • @edyson22
    @edyson22 2 роки тому +2

    I guess 2 Neptune anti -ship missiles can sink a Slava class cruiser.

  • @sirnodrick222
    @sirnodrick222 2 роки тому +6

    Well done Cap! Love how you threw caution to the wind and got on with a video about current affairs. Keep up the good work.
    See you at RIAT?

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  2 роки тому

      Yes I've booked tickets for the Saturday.

    • @sirnodrick222
      @sirnodrick222 2 роки тому

      @@grimreapers gutted… we are there Sunday. Maybe next year Cap!

  • @whousley
    @whousley 2 роки тому +4

    The RL Moskva was seriously damaged today by something.
    The Ukrainians claimed to have hit it with two missiles from a hidden Neptune missile battery. The Russians say it was a fire onboard that set off some ammunition.
    So, if it is now inoperable, is the rest of the Black Sea Fleet now vulnerable to high altitude air strikes like you folks demonstrated?

    • @jmkhenka
      @jmkhenka 2 роки тому +1

      ironic - 30 missiles cant sink a DCS fleet. In reality, all it took was 2. Shows the innaccuracy of DCS when it comes to missiles and spotting stuff. This is probably the first recorded anti ship operation in modern history where two equals (in tech) met. Pentagon and everyone else in navy ops are now scared shitless as it proves that they all rely on theory of anti missile systems and radars.. and it failed in reality. One thing to be out in open sea with no civilians but in a small area like the black sea with outside interference a anti ship missile is way more effective then previous thought.

    • @whousley
      @whousley 2 роки тому +1

      @@jmkhenka Maybe you have more up to date info than I do...but those particular missiles are subsonic and have small warheads. They shouldn't have been able to close with a guided missile cruiser, much less seriously damage it. However, if it was operating too close to shore, or the crew didn't react to the threat competently, or if that ship had design flaws that meant that it really can't take hits, then those could have all been factors...and none of us would be surprised by any of those factors given what we've already seen of the Russian military during this conflict.
      Regardless, Turkey had closed the entrance to the Black Sea to all warships, so if they can't repair that cruiser and put it back into service, then there likely won't be another to replace her within the scope of this conflict.
      Edit: Also, I don't believe for a second that anything can damage that ship enough to require evacuation...and yet not kill anyone on board. That's just silly.

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  2 роки тому +1

      Yeh, ships are so fragile IRL. Just one hit can kill. Same with British frigates in Falklands.

  • @skylosfoxtrot2350
    @skylosfoxtrot2350 2 роки тому

    Cortana had the best gear, she literally rocking a VR headset, sick!

  • @808M4K3H808
    @808M4K3H808 2 роки тому

    Just discovered this channel , amazing work 🙌

  • @abigfish1620
    @abigfish1620 2 роки тому +4

    This was awesome, but could you do a similar scenario using only assets that Ukraine has? See if it would be theoretically possible to pull it off with their older tech and aircraft?

    • @totalnerd5674
      @totalnerd5674 2 роки тому +6

      They already simmed that IRL, the answer is yes

    • @c128stuff
      @c128stuff 2 роки тому +2

      We no longer need a simulation for that... Cruiser has been promoted to submarine by a couple Ukrainian missiles.

  • @huntforandrew
    @huntforandrew 2 роки тому +5

    No way would it take nearly that many hits to kill a Russian heavy cruiser. When you pack a ship with as many missiles as it can possibly carry you're basically a floating bomb. Just one of those munitions gets hit and the ship is done. Hell look what the Ukrainians were able to do to that amphibious landing ship with just one strike. Sank 1 and was even able to damage 2 nearby ships.

    • @carloswendtful
      @carloswendtful 2 роки тому +2

      You, sir, have been proven right. Long live the Neptunes!

  • @bulldog71ss33
    @bulldog71ss33 2 роки тому +1

    Great vid GR.

  • @shotsfiredandmissed9068
    @shotsfiredandmissed9068 2 роки тому +1

    12:50 queue top gun "danger zone" theme song

  • @elestromusicgamesfun1101
    @elestromusicgamesfun1101 2 роки тому +5

    Hm, wouldn't the ruskies have S-400 coverage in the area?

    • @jacobcooper269
      @jacobcooper269 2 роки тому +5

      @@TeenTeenFpv The S-400 has a maximum effective range of 400 km. Crimea is 180km from the location of the fleet, according to his in-game map. It's also a known fact that Russia has had S-400 missile systems in Crimea for quite some time.

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  2 роки тому +1

      I didn;t think it reached Odessa? Current coverage.

  • @bruce4623
    @bruce4623 2 роки тому +6

    *Question:* Kortana, what is your nationality? I can't detect an accent ( of course you do not have to answer ) 🙂
    And nice work guys, but I wonder if in reality we ( the USA ) would of relied more heavily on F35's, F22's and B1's? ( meaning it would've been an all stealth attack )

    • @cockatoo010
      @cockatoo010 2 роки тому +2

      funny, I always thought she sonded american, from like GA or SC

    • @bruce4623
      @bruce4623 2 роки тому

      @@cockatoo010 I think American as well ...

    • @RyanHellyer
      @RyanHellyer 2 роки тому +1

      Sounds American to me.

    • @bruce4623
      @bruce4623 2 роки тому +1

      @@TeenTeenFpv 😆

    • @tombeers3489
      @tombeers3489 2 роки тому +2

      My guess....Mid-West, U.S.

  • @davidlarondelle2326
    @davidlarondelle2326 2 роки тому

    You did kill the Slava cruiser! Great job guys

  • @zeusandathena4094
    @zeusandathena4094 2 роки тому

    Love the lines》》 " get some and no more boom boom " Movie Full Metal Jacket..great simulation

  • @cmdrhudson
    @cmdrhudson 2 роки тому +3

    Next Video should be titled "Could a US Battlegroup beat a russian ICBM-attack on the US-Carrier group in the mediterranean sea?"

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  2 роки тому +2

      I would if I could simulate ICBM in game...

  • @wolfhauzer3178
    @wolfhauzer3178 2 роки тому +4

    18:38 Missile: "Its time to Destroy this ship"
    Ship: "Invisible Mode Activated!" *goes right through the ship*
    Me : "OMG ITS A GHOST SHIP!"

  • @chacdogful
    @chacdogful 2 роки тому +2

    Idk how I found this channel, never watched a gaming video but damn do I want to play this.
    What is it?
    Haven’t gamed in 20 years 😂

  • @DumbPuck123456789
    @DumbPuck123456789 2 роки тому +2

    What made you decide to say screw the powers that be? Whatever it is, I love it!

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  2 роки тому +2

      The guys who make the game have pissed me off so just going to do what ever I want from now on.

    • @DumbPuck123456789
      @DumbPuck123456789 2 роки тому

      @@grimreapers stick it to them, cap!

  • @tatrgela
    @tatrgela 2 роки тому +3

    2 weeks and 2 Neptunes later - this video looks obsolete

  • @user-ip3xn1pl1k
    @user-ip3xn1pl1k 2 роки тому +6

    And where is the air cover for the landing operation from air bases in the Crimea and mainland Russia? Where is Russian Air Force & Black Sea Fleet Naval Aviation?:)

    • @oladiedoo50
      @oladiedoo50 2 роки тому

      Ukraine shot them down.

    • @hepphepps8356
      @hepphepps8356 2 роки тому +4

      Being used as tractors in Ukraine? Sold to finance some yacht? Gambled away in a vodka cloud? Sabotaged by their own? Anything is possible.

    • @thedausthed
      @thedausthed 2 роки тому +2

      @@hepphepps8356 They were sent straight to hell via TLAM strike before hand.

    • @jacobcooper269
      @jacobcooper269 2 роки тому

      @@hepphepps8356 It's funny you reference corruption in regards to Russia, while omitting the fact that according to the Panama Papers, Ukraine's own Poreshenko and Zelensky were both included in the leaks, utilizing secretive offshore accounts to hide their financial activities from the masses. Then just two weeks ago they found an ex-member of Ukraine's government, who fled the country, with $30,000,000 shoved away in his luggage.

  • @donaldstanker9692
    @donaldstanker9692 2 роки тому

    Very nice, I enjoyed it

  • @derjogderjog8031
    @derjogderjog8031 2 роки тому

    I don't know where you all come from...but the video is really exciting...THANKS

  • @-007-2
    @-007-2 2 роки тому +7

    I think the Russians would have more air and anti air defence. You've basically modelled them as sitting ducks, minus the one.

    • @bighands69
      @bighands69 2 роки тому +5

      Yes they would be sitting ducks. A combination of US missiles and aircraft would over power Russia.
      The volume of fire would be so high and intense that it would over power Russia.

    • @SargeantKoranFlusher
      @SargeantKoranFlusher 2 роки тому

      @@bighands69 As is the US Navy sitting ducks.. The US Navy and DC & Pentagon would be utterly destroyed if the US ever directly fires on Russia and it wouldn't matter who fired first. The US does not have the capability to shoot down Russia's high speed missiles.

    • @sorincaladera936
      @sorincaladera936 2 роки тому +3

      They really don't, they started with next to nothing during the invasion, and are rapidly running out. Russia hasn't mobilized any of its S series into ukraine, my guess is they're scared to lose them. Russia can't replace their losses

    • @michaelsauer9129
      @michaelsauer9129 2 роки тому +2

      They clearly not expecting an coordinated air attack - which seems like a good assumption, so far. Its possible the Ukranians might launch one if a landing is started, they might consider it to be worth a considerable fraction of their remaining air force to kill the troops while at sea.

  • @SecularFelinist
    @SecularFelinist 2 роки тому +3

    Game's damage model is off. Those JDAMs should be causing catastrophic damage.

    • @johndododoe1411
      @johndododoe1411 2 роки тому

      JDAMs are simple stupid bombs with an aimbot added. They blow a hole where they hit and hit where they are pointed, but they don't magically cause more damage than they would without the aimbot. But of cause the soldiers can aim where they expect it to hurt the most.

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  2 роки тому

      agree

  • @tomlee7651
    @tomlee7651 2 роки тому +1

    I like this channel. Can't believe I haven't found it sooner.

  • @mr.starks
    @mr.starks 2 роки тому +1

    Brilliant entertainment Sir. As per usual you come thru with the Navel request an ting. Appreciated. Then I see the opening bombing run with the B2's, possible bombing missions in the future? Sir..

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  2 роки тому +2

      You'll hopefully enjoy the next one.... and ting.

  • @beyazmitsubishil2009
    @beyazmitsubishil2009 2 роки тому +4

    Last week i attended to air force academy exam wish me luck bois

  • @OWNYOMAMA
    @OWNYOMAMA 2 роки тому +3

    And it’s gone