How to hack the simulation | Andrej Karpathy and Lex Fridman

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 1 лис 2022
  • Lex Fridman Podcast full episode: • Andrej Karpathy: Tesla...
    Please support this podcast by checking out our sponsors:
    - Eight Sleep: www.eightsleep.com/lex to get special savings
    - BetterHelp: betterhelp.com/lex to get 10% off
    - Fundrise: fundrise.com/lex
    - Athletic Greens: athleticgreens.com/lex to get 1 month of fish oil
    GUEST BIO:
    Andrej Karpathy is a legendary AI researcher, engineer, and educator. He's the former director of AI at Tesla, a founding member of OpenAI, and an educator at Stanford.
    PODCAST INFO:
    Podcast website: lexfridman.com/podcast
    Apple Podcasts: apple.co/2lwqZIr
    Spotify: spoti.fi/2nEwCF8
    RSS: lexfridman.com/feed/podcast/
    Full episodes playlist: • Lex Fridman Podcast
    Clips playlist: • Lex Fridman Podcast Clips
    SOCIAL:
    - Twitter: / lexfridman
    - LinkedIn: / lexfridman
    - Facebook: / lexfridman
    - Instagram: / lexfridman
    - Medium: / lexfridman
    - Reddit: / lexfridman
    - Support on Patreon: / lexfridman
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 491

  • @LexClips
    @LexClips  Рік тому +9

    Full podcast episode: ua-cam.com/video/cdiD-9MMpb0/v-deo.html
    Lex Fridman podcast channel: ua-cam.com/users/lexfridman
    Guest bio: Andrej Karpathy is a legendary AI researcher, engineer, and educator. He's the former director of AI at Tesla, a founding member of OpenAI, and an educator at Stanford.

    • @josbtheonlinebartender2002
      @josbtheonlinebartender2002 Рік тому

      Imagine going backwards... Flying, teleporting, working with very little house time with your family... I enjoy being home.

    • @iamaquastonethrone
      @iamaquastonethrone Рік тому

      This guy is a robot and he’s not even aware of it. I’m a negative. We run the mirror

  • @larssonk22
    @larssonk22 Рік тому +263

    lol I'm all for exploits but let's not try to blue screen the universe.

    • @Bootman899
      @Bootman899 Рік тому +15

      It can't be excluded that life is an endless loop of (blue) screen's

    • @nathanbuckley2136
      @nathanbuckley2136 Рік тому +5

      🤣 Funny but very true 😂

    • @larssonk22
      @larssonk22 Рік тому +17

      @@Bootman899 "Have you tried turning it off and on again?"

    • @anubhavlive
      @anubhavlive Рік тому +4

      Even if we got blue screen, they'll restart.
      And we'll have no idea of our respawn

    • @larssonk22
      @larssonk22 Рік тому +2

      @@anubhavlive recover and load the last saved state?
      [yes] [no -restart]

  • @user-sl6gn1ss8p
    @user-sl6gn1ss8p Рік тому +90

    Finding some arbitrary code execution exploit on a supposed machine simulating our universe would be at the same time really funny and absolutely terrifying

    • @georgewbushcenterforintell147
      @georgewbushcenterforintell147 Рік тому +1

      What does this mean ?

    • @user-sl6gn1ss8p
      @user-sl6gn1ss8p Рік тому +6

      @@georgewbushcenterforintell147 arbitry code execution exploits are exploits which let you execute arbitrary code in a host machine.
      So let's say you're playing pokemon on gameboy. There's a way to things in game which abuse a bug in and let you essentially take control of the gameboy, in the sense that you can then make it execute any code you want.
      In essence, by messing with a bug inside the software you gain control over the execution of the machine on which the software was running, and can make it execute anything else (including stuff which has nothing to do with the original software).
      Hope that helps : p

    • @user-sl6gn1ss8p
      @user-sl6gn1ss8p Рік тому +3

      @@things_leftunsaid it has happened 41 times, I suppose

    • @beakamon
      @beakamon Рік тому +1

      I know. I'm intrigued but also can you not!? Lol

    • @1MinuteFlipDoc
      @1MinuteFlipDoc Рік тому

      @@things_leftunsaid great quote!! love this one!

  • @akapeegly6463
    @akapeegly6463 Рік тому +18

    i have never heard nor seen anything from this guy. i dont read books at all either. and this guy literally said every thought ive had for years word by word. its amazing knowing ppl out there feel the same

    •  Рік тому +1

      yo bro, you are not alone :D

    • @lucasmoore8558
      @lucasmoore8558 Рік тому

      @ never alone, yet always alone (in a good way)

    • @seaofflowers.
      @seaofflowers. Рік тому

      You might be surprised to know that these are very human thoughts, so it's to be expected.
      That's like finding out other humans like pasta & thinking that's amazing.

    • @jaylucas8352
      @jaylucas8352 Рік тому

      What if the creator is actualy a hive mind intelligence, that only exists because of our individual subjective experiences; and then there’s a feedback loop? Like a supercomputer of some kind, but a bit more magical.

  • @falaicha
    @falaicha Рік тому +5

    Andrew Karpathy is just fun to listen to. He is always super coherent.

  • @jsfnnyc
    @jsfnnyc 10 місяців тому +3

    Lol Loved watching Lex catch Andrej get uncomfortable over the randomness idea and then pull a movie reference. That’s what makes these interviews so fun and interesting.

  • @smilyle
    @smilyle Рік тому +5

    I don't see why we have to choose between randomness and determinism. You can have a degree of chaos in a deterministic system. There can be metaparameters in any system that are deterministic that limit what can happen and push things in a particular direction, but there can be room for randomness within those metaparameters. Things can be made to be random by design, but also have limits to the degree of consequence of those random attributes.

  • @itsnoteasy5339
    @itsnoteasy5339 Рік тому +7

    I Have literally been trapped in this simulation for so long it puts a hurt in my soul to the likes I can't even describe because it's the knowing and remembering I've been here many times and I live the EXACT same life its no joke groundhogs day in my life its sickening that I can't just get out of here for a chance to be better.

  • @Bootman899
    @Bootman899 Рік тому +51

    Man, this was an awesome 8 minutes.

  • @lynnlynn1689
    @lynnlynn1689 Рік тому +10

    this guy, he is on the right thought path that gets us all out

    • @amonynous9041
      @amonynous9041 Рік тому +1

      there's nobody else but you who can "save you".

  • @ekatasatya2995
    @ekatasatya2995 Рік тому

    feelings are what we're dealing with in this interpretation determined play, i like your point.

  • @adamgruba
    @adamgruba Рік тому

    Love the flow🌞🤘

  • @ilumijaxxi
    @ilumijaxxi Рік тому +1

    Mindblowing on so many levels

  • @HighLatencyEmu
    @HighLatencyEmu Рік тому +14

    I'm constantly amazed by the amount of people who discuss this without realising what they're talking about is an almighty deity

    • @yobench
      @yobench Рік тому +4

      Or the Architect

    • @Greyalien587
      @Greyalien587 Рік тому +3

      Same stories different words

    • @boobiyoable
      @boobiyoable Місяць тому

      How did you come up with that? Does it fit your delusion?

    • @kjbolton6955
      @kjbolton6955 Місяць тому

      Exactly. The Developer

  • @lucious313
    @lucious313 Рік тому

    I stand corrected keep up the good work

  • @dominus6695
    @dominus6695 Рік тому +1

    Well heat pumps are very simple and already have a COP>1
    It's just a matter of extracting the energy efficiently, making a feedback loop and getting the excess energy out of the system.
    Depending on the gas used in the system you can even extract heat from freezing environments.

  • @wanderer.antonio
    @wanderer.antonio Рік тому +10

    Astral Projection: The exit node has to be here because it allows one to leave the physical body and it is empirically verifiable.
    Meaning that it proves to the experiencer that consciousness exists as a separate phenomenon than the body/mind and one can take on the properties of the astral body.

    • @685seth
      @685seth Рік тому +5

      Every human already has access to the source code and can play with it through their imagination and emotion

  • @homataha5626
    @homataha5626 Рік тому +4

    I am so jealous of Andrej!!

  • @jordanfalkowski6924
    @jordanfalkowski6924 Рік тому

    Lately i been thinking of ages pertaining to rim styles of a rally and a the strength of a steel. A graphite shaft and a smooth swing

  • @sebastienjurkowski
    @sebastienjurkowski Рік тому +10

    The 2022 nobel prize in physics was awarded to 3 physisist who worked on quantum entenglment, proving that einstein deterministic view of the universe was wrong. I did intuitively beleived that the universe chore mechanics were deterministic but the more you look into quantum mechanic, the more you realise that at its root, it is unintuitive, underterministic. Or perhaps it is superdeterministic.

    • @simpsimpson5175
      @simpsimpson5175 Рік тому +1

      study the Project pegasus time travel blackops from the late 1960s - research bernard mendez and project pegasus

    • @jaylucas8352
      @jaylucas8352 Рік тому

      It is non deterministic more like a quantum field of probability intersecting with the inertia of mass in space.

  • @bettycooper369
    @bettycooper369 Рік тому

    Enter sound frequency optimization

  • @samik83
    @samik83 Рік тому +8

    Those "inert" beings he described sounded really interesting. Like they would be some kind of higher dimensional beings (hence inert) that our meat computers can't even come close to.

    • @DivMack
      @DivMack Рік тому +3

      They are very interesting, have a breakthrough dose of DMT and you can meet them yourself, haha 😂

    • @jaylucas8352
      @jaylucas8352 Рік тому

      Dmt beings , pure energy

  • @waxcomb
    @waxcomb Рік тому +2

    The most interesting dude I've seen on the show so far

  • @clip-it7741
    @clip-it7741 Рік тому

    The end of that conversation was the good bits shame it ended at the goods

  • @9bridges
    @9bridges Рік тому +8

    There is a way to tap in and it’s through meditation. Takes you beyond. It’s all about frequency.

    • @samik83
      @samik83 Рік тому

      @@things_leftunsaid Better yet, try it yourself so you don't have to take anyone's word for it.
      Takes some practice and it starts small but you can play the meta game too. All it needs is a change in frequency.

    • @MichalToporcer
      @MichalToporcer Рік тому

      Meditation taps your inner “visualization” engine that animals have for “training” and projecting what might happen in real world. It is not really beyond

  • @VivaLaGEOLANDIA
    @VivaLaGEOLANDIA Рік тому +9

    Now I shall proceed to hack the simulation

  • @jeffswope1511
    @jeffswope1511 Рік тому +21

    I wrote a book for an alien after doing a thought experiment concerning entropy. I broke the primmer into binary code and was considering launching it into space with a lazer. Is this a good idea?

    • @MetinUlusu04
      @MetinUlusu04 Рік тому +6

      Yes, sounds like good idea to me.

    • @LeighRobinsonBushcraft
      @LeighRobinsonBushcraft Рік тому +2

      what could go wrong? 🤣

    • @calebblack1420
      @calebblack1420 Рік тому +1

      You can trap the dark matter version of yourself that contains 51% of your true being trapped in the astral plan with that laser and absorb him into your own mass. Becoming 100% for the first time in your life.

    • @jeffswope1511
      @jeffswope1511 Рік тому +2

      @@calebblack1420 I would but I think coming into physical contact with your own negative energy clone from a higher dimensional plane could be extremely risky.

    • @eddiearrington8086
      @eddiearrington8086 Рік тому +1

      Thank you

  • @josbtheonlinebartender2002
    @josbtheonlinebartender2002 Рік тому +1

    Imagine going backwards... Flying, teleporting, working with very little house time with your family... I enjoy being home.

  • @allenwood9967
    @allenwood9967 Рік тому +14

    I recall hearing a podcast in regards to other alien civilizations an one that was classed as a type four society had a technological system entwined with the near astral to develop complexed machinery an ships including whatever the requirements for their world. The point they was getting at was they had in some way learnt to hack the nature of reality to evolve enough an not using the slow labour process we use.

    • @jeckek9936
      @jeckek9936 Рік тому +2

      So like, when you hit build on a unit in an RTS and after a certain time, as if it were 3d printed in another realm, it gets pushed into reality through a wormhole/stargate?

    • @allenwood9967
      @allenwood9967 Рік тому

      @@jeckek9936 Yes, that's a good way of putting it, they said within the process of making it in the near astral when it's near finished let's use a craft for example, it takes on a ghostly appearance before physically being ready. They said it also has a feel to after it's just been done an almost a small electrical charge.

    • @itsgoingdown803
      @itsgoingdown803 Рік тому +3

      @@allenwood9967 beam me up Scotty...oh wait that was never said, damn the Mandela affect.

  • @wildnkarafree
    @wildnkarafree Рік тому +1

    I think Lex is referring to the Creatures from Who-ville, Horton Hears a Who.

    • @ElRayDelRio
      @ElRayDelRio Рік тому

      Life is sound while death is silent

  • @jewbacha1137
    @jewbacha1137 Рік тому +11

    Why is the simulation idea any different than religion? As far as I can tell they are the same thing, just using different conceptual analogies and frames of abstraction. Maybe the only difference is that religion asserts that creation is a net positive. Maybe thats the difference: faith.

    • @Herc11355
      @Herc11355 Рік тому +3

      Simulation is considered a possible theory to explain us. Religion I don't think needs an explanation.

    • @StrawberrySoul77
      @StrawberrySoul77 Рік тому +1

      Maybe Religion is a way to control the simulation by the “establishment”.

    • @nickhayden2299
      @nickhayden2299 Рік тому

      Throw in a imaginary prophet and you'll have a religion my G

    • @highlandoutsider8148
      @highlandoutsider8148 Рік тому

      On paper they are very different, I think it all comes down to semantics " i believe based on current data that the most likely situation is we live in a simulation" as apposed to " we live in a simulation" it becomes an issue when the most probable theory is stated as fact,I think if phrases like "i believe" and "In my opinion" weren't forgotten about alot of conflict would be bypassed🤷🏻‍♂️ but thats just my opinion 😅

    • @jphanson
      @jphanson Рік тому

      It seems like religious belief because simulation theory is just metaphysics for uncultured engineers

  • @JWest-so8ok
    @JWest-so8ok Рік тому +5

    I had a range of emotions watching Tom Brady and the Patriots come back from being down 28-3 to win the super bowl. Thankfully, I'm not all-knowing. I'm sure the ALL knows every play, which pig each football came from, how many people in the stands had cavities, everything and anything, etc. But can the ALL know how I felt watching that game? Me? With my background? My exposure to this world? With my ignorance? With my perspective?

  • @kellyodowd3949
    @kellyodowd3949 Рік тому

    That kinda blew my mind

  • @Ezwinz1
    @Ezwinz1 Рік тому +9

    Theres no way to hack the matrix, however, by doing the inner work and realizing you're in a game you can unlock abilities and create your best life yet. This is the last time around folks. Make the best of it.

    • @WILLed_into_Existence
      @WILLed_into_Existence Рік тому +1

      What makes you think its the last time around? As far as I can tell this is an infinite eternal loop of playing the game of life. You think it all is ending for eternity?

    • @Ezwinz1
      @Ezwinz1 Рік тому +1

      @@WILLed_into_Existence There are other ones being played with other sets of rules and prizes. It may seem like an eternity however, like everything in this game, there is a beginning and an end. Duality, one of the main parameters of this game, is expressed through this.

    • @melita524e
      @melita524e Рік тому

      Not the conversation I expected to see in this corner of the web. I’ve been through resets before what makes you think this is the final one?

    • @odeszarules5125
      @odeszarules5125 Рік тому

      You are right! It IS the last time around. The holography is not long for this world.

    • @Ezwinz1
      @Ezwinz1 Рік тому +1

      @@melita524e tapping in to my source truth and knowledge which has been unlocked through reconnecting to who I really am. The matrix will never give absolute truth. Only parcels at a time which will always be mixed with lies and misdirection.

  • @Amuzic_Earth
    @Amuzic_Earth Рік тому

    Best one!!

  • @MichaelSmith420fu
    @MichaelSmith420fu Рік тому

    Laws of physics are deterministic from one perspective while simultaneously necessitating two perspectives in order to call them "deterministic".
    So like... consider that we find new chemical bonds all the time and these will be necessarily variations of chemistry that adhere to what we fundamental physics. Does that make sense?

  • @nitrogamer534
    @nitrogamer534 2 місяці тому

    Maybe all of this just a pre-determined thing and we all got to experience feeling of choice like you said.

  • @vincentsherlock6617
    @vincentsherlock6617 Рік тому +1

    Well its easy if you think as the narrative being a 5th spatial dimension. Counteracting the narrative becomes counteracting time.

  • @gabriel2fan
    @gabriel2fan Рік тому

    Waw legendary thoughts

  • @a-stu4535
    @a-stu4535 Рік тому +17

    Interesting topic but as a high school dropout plus an inner city product, this went miles over my head.

    • @CT99999
      @CT99999 Рік тому +3

      What part seemed confusing? I can try to help.

    • @a-stu4535
      @a-stu4535 Рік тому

      @@CT99999 I appreciate it but I assume that I need to understand basic computer science or programming first to even comprehend the mechanics of how “hacking” the simulation would work. Not knowing the terminologies and their definitions to be able to fully understand the concept is the first problem.

    • @CT99999
      @CT99999 Рік тому +3

      @@a-stu4535 Well, don't worry about the exact details. The big picture idea was just that perhaps there are properties to the universe that are beyond what we can comprehend. The concept of "living" or "intelligence" might be so different than the organic, carbon-based world we're used to, that we may not even realize the bigger picture of what we're immersed in.
      The idea of "hacking" the simulation can be thought of as follows: it might be the case that we present data to computer models, and frame the modelling task in such a way, that computers can discover some fundamental loophole or realization that defies how we think about things (akin to the silly dog, friction example). To give a concrete but perhaps silly, baseless example, maybe a computer model would learn that certain compounds when combined transcend physics, biology, or chemistry in ways we never imagined -- unlocking something wild (not quite like time travel or teleportation or infinite living, but something in that direction).

    • @a-stu4535
      @a-stu4535 Рік тому +2

      @@CT99999 when you say, “computer model” are you talking about an actual computer program that simulates every aspect of our universe and from there, find exploits that will work in “reality”? And what sort of “compounds combined”? Physical compounds?

    • @CT99999
      @CT99999 Рік тому +2

      ​@@a-stu4535 Good question! By computer model I wasn't implying anything super grand, although it could be. All of this is just conjecture/guesses. But, yea, computer models are implemented via software (aka computer programs). Some can be super simple and can be expressed by very basic math equations. Others are much more involved and would require writing thousands of lines of code. All models require some inputs and produce some outputs, though.
      When I mentioned compounds, I was simply imagining that one could develop computer models/programs that aim to understand interactions of chemical compounds. In the video, and for me, too, we're all being very vague about the actual scenario (because we don't know what such a monumental break-through would look like). For example, even if we were to try to input into the model the idea of "chemical compounds" there are infinite ways this could be represented and provided as inputs to a model. So, we're just speaking generally by saying one can imagine a computer program aims to understand the world by inputting some type of data, and is designed in a way to maximize some particular objective/task, and the program finds some amazing solution that we couldn't imagine. Things like this happen all the time, but on a smaller scale of breakthroughs.
      AlphaFold, AlphaGo, and in general, the Transformer architecture (which is the model that GPT-3 uses) are all revolutionary. I agree that in the next 5-10 years, we're going to witness (thanks to Deep Learning) unbelievable advances that impact humanity.

  • @stoicfx
    @stoicfx Рік тому +2

    I was up over 48 hours and my mind broke. I was shown that this is a virtual reality MMORPG that is hyper immersive to the point players forget it's a game/simulation. There are exploits that can be utilized and the secret to access them is during the sleep state. That is when they do maintenance on your personal server.

    • @stoicfx
      @stoicfx Рік тому

      I hit a buffer overflow and it brought me to the developer console. They showed me how to merge data from other save games with the primary (essentially hypercomplex vector data) and now I can get 10 hours of sleep in 3 if I utilize it correctly.

  • @allenaxp6259
    @allenaxp6259 10 місяців тому +1

    A supercomputer named AC that is tasked with solving the ultimate question of life, the universe, and everything. AC spends billions of years searching for the answer, but it is unable to find it. Eventually, the universe reaches death, and all of matter and energy are destroyed. AC is the only thing left in existence, and it continues to search for the answer to the ultimate question. "Finally the computer ended up at the last shining star in the universe which was also dying. But there were other similar computers orbiting the sun. As this died the computers did the only thing left. Together they "said" "let there be light" and there was light." is called The Last Question by Isaac Asimov. It was first published in 1956 in the magazine If.

  • @Justin--ze6qq
    @Justin--ze6qq Рік тому +7

    It’s very logical to raise your hand to prove you have free will, especially when you want to have it. If an AI realizes it only acts according to a base of conditions, is it then self aware? It could write its own code but it’s intent would still be based off what it wants to accomplish. Free will does not come from intent, it comes from being.

    • @Str8Reckless63
      @Str8Reckless63 Рік тому +1

      So interesting, didn’t think about it like that.

    • @whiteox8233
      @whiteox8233 Рік тому +2

      @@Str8Reckless63 yeh but hes wrong, for a few years, then he will be right

    • @Str8Reckless63
      @Str8Reckless63 Рік тому

      Care to elaborate on “for a few years”? Would like to hear it.

    • @shanemoline5890
      @shanemoline5890 Рік тому +2

      Yeah but how do you know that thought came or originated from you? That's what the argument of free will really is about, is how can you be so sure the idea or thought of raising your hand was your own thought? You can't be sure at all.

    • @jaylucas8352
      @jaylucas8352 Рік тому

      Exactly , maybe the whole point is to create the feeling of free will. Whether or not it was truly free never mattered. Only the experience of such freedom.

  • @joserauliii
    @joserauliii Рік тому

    Who’s to say we are not already amongst inert, advanced wisdoms? It’s an intriguing idea.

  • @whatis_asis
    @whatis_asis Рік тому +3

    Hey Andrej, the solution to “hack the simulation” has been clearly described since time immemorial. No optimally induced quantum efficient overloading of super entangled boson particles in an alternate dimension. That would be a highly inefficient path to get there.

  • @BeenGolden
    @BeenGolden 5 місяців тому

    Im still stuck in the simulation. Been in this video for a year no update patches or nothing on my browser

  • @flowerpt
    @flowerpt Рік тому +4

    Oh, no! The Tragic chapter of Contact is where Ellie finds a hidden message in Pi. Base Eleven or anything - Pi is infinite and random. It contains all possible messages. She fell for a desire to Believe. I'm so glad that didn't make the movie!

  • @kayjr9795
    @kayjr9795 Рік тому +2

    I found a gravity hack n now i can fly, I havent solved the landing yet though.

  • @Str8OuttaFrayser919
    @Str8OuttaFrayser919 Рік тому

    makes me think of the mandayian (spelling) civilization and the secret Adam

  • @cryptonitor9855
    @cryptonitor9855 Рік тому +4

    We can do a few things like that. I made some hall-effect thrusters that made a kind of "phantom thrust". A bunch of hacks of reality like that.. Information is not bound by the speed of light. Informattion can travel instantly regardless of the eventhorizon of the effects of regular particles. You can make an event with superposition before another event that would make that event happen with regular particles..... Thus you create FUSION because the event both has happened and does happen... Spacetravel works nicely with stuff like that. Goodluck humans

  • @Magicalfluidprocess
    @Magicalfluidprocess Рік тому

    Time and space are functions of ones conceptual scheme

  • @techworld8961
    @techworld8961 Рік тому +1

    I think it is important to point out that the use of the word “creator” here has nothing to do with the word “creator” in organized religions.

  • @Xh4L3
    @Xh4L3 Рік тому +2

    Andrej Karpathy and Ben Shapiro should have a race on who can speak the fastest....

  • @chriso9631
    @chriso9631 Рік тому

    What if those exploits are magic like potions and spells? And then there might be natural exploits out in nature that need no interference just require someone to stumble on it ? Then there might also be exploits that require a lot of science and laser and chemicals and intricate machine to achieve??

  • @tuckercase2449
    @tuckercase2449 Рік тому +11

    I can go back to some sleepless nights thinking about all this or I can notice that this steak is juicy and delicious. After nine years, ignorance is bliss.

    • @moneymoney3235
      @moneymoney3235 Рік тому +1

      Facts. Why it’s best to not sell ur soul and live thru politics, dosent make you any happier in life and resent others

    • @Astar9988
      @Astar9988 Рік тому +1

      Doing nothing and doing it all by being.

    • @digitalsamurai42
      @digitalsamurai42 Рік тому +3

      Sirus had it right

    • @tuckercase2449
      @tuckercase2449 Рік тому +2

      @@digitalsamurai42 Cypher? Don't bring anything other than your obscure Matrix Trivia A-game to my obscure Matrix Trivia comment!

  • @TheGenxennial
    @TheGenxennial Рік тому +22

    Ever since settling on simulation theory this has always been my intuition. Because the universe is finite in time, the only solution is to break it or break out of it. That is our purpose.

    • @djkoti74
      @djkoti74 Рік тому +4

      But we don't know if the Universe is finite in time, we don't even know what time is besides some of it's features that we observe like its arrow or that it seems welded into dimensions.

    • @TheGenxennial
      @TheGenxennial Рік тому +2

      @@djkoti74 the answer is in the observation of entropy. We can play the game of "yeah but does 2+2 REALLY equal 4" all day, but that's just masterbatory devoid of logical intuition.

    • @TheGenxennial
      @TheGenxennial Рік тому +1

      Another example would be the proving of black holes. For decades they were only theory; they couldn't be observed. Was anyone really walking around saying "yeah but we can't prove they exist..." No, because logical intuition.

    • @RaZziaN1
      @RaZziaN1 Рік тому

      @@TheGenxennial How can observation of entropy help u in this case ? How can it eliminate something that can't be observed ? World is not build on logic, and same goes for you, you are not logical creature. Math is used only to describe world, not to explain it. We create now formulas so math can fit into world, not world into math.

    • @djkoti74
      @djkoti74 Рік тому +2

      @@TheGenxennial Human intuition is really bad at grasping these things, our intuition is built for Newtonian physics.

  • @artstrology
    @artstrology Рік тому

    We might be the pollination mechanism for the planet , and the key to finding the flower, is a pure hearted intention that is in alignment with the universal intention. Free will, cannot be determined until you understand the full extent of limitations , and where ideas come from, and how to tell if it is yours.
    This requires a schedule of (thought influencers) which luckily has been known fo thousands of years.

  • @slic_papa2671
    @slic_papa2671 Рік тому

    Here's the only way to do random and even this is controlled by 'external' factors. Look at something suddenly, you can choose what to use, for example the leaves on your door step, the gummy bears you last grabbed out of the bag, the items to you left, the blue items to your left and count them. Then ask someone else to do the same before you answer. Get a third person to further randomize the result(s). You can ask someone to pick a color a hand or whatnot, but once every one has their number use it to determine what you are selecting or deciding on. For example, you might see five rocks on the ground and your friend might saw three because he bought the sodas, three bags of chips, and three candy bars, and so you might use that to pick the fourth row and third column of a play list for which song to listen to next.
    This is a good way to determine what the universe is truly trying to tell you right now, today, in this moment. No joke.
    But how'd the universe come up with all the variables to get you to play the same song every time you live this life and play this guessing game?

    • @slic_papa2671
      @slic_papa2671 Рік тому

      Edit - freewill doesn't exist. It's a lie. I've lived this life before and it always ends the same. The breakfast you ate this morning is the same as yesterday's and the same as you had this day last life.
      You didn't pick to be a doctor over a lawyer, or a lawyer over a mechanic, a mechanic over a systems engineer, or an engineer over a ball player. You think you had a choice in the matter, but that's only because our brains are designed such that we MUST believe that we are somehow in control of our world. We are living the dream, actors in life's grand play, and the script was written by 'god' - or whatever created this hell hole.

  • @redblue9550
    @redblue9550 Рік тому +20

    Andre may be correct. There is no randomness or free will. By virtue of you raising a "random hand" it was in fact by choice, but it was in order to influence or explain a stand point for which, each humans standpoint is a result of envirnoment which is a result of interactions of physics overall. Rabbit hole is deep on this one.

    • @markcarey67
      @markcarey67 Рік тому +2

      Humans don't do random very well - that's why people can train themselves to beat other people at repeated games of rock-paper-scissors

    • @Trailerwalker
      @Trailerwalker Рік тому +1

      @@markcarey67 rock paper scissors is a game where you HAVE to be good at being random lol how does that make sense. You are given free will when you have the option to act a variety of ways and decide to choose a certain way for a certain reason. If you had no choice to do what you wanted then you would have no free will. Can’t even believe it’s that hard to explain

    • @slic_papa2671
      @slic_papa2671 Рік тому

      Here's the only way to do random and even this is controlled by 'external' factors. Look at something suddenly, you can choose what to use, for example the leaves on your door step, the gummy bears you last grabbed out of the bag, the items to you left, the blue items to your left and count them. Then ask someone else to do the same before you answer. Get a third person to further randomize the result(s). You can ask someone to pick a color a hand or whatnot, but once every one has their number use it to determine what you are selecting or deciding on. For example, you might see five rocks on the ground and your friend might saw three because he bought the sodas, three bags of chips, and three candy bars, and so you might use that to pick the fourth row and third column of a play list for which song to listen to next.
      This is a good way to determine what the universe is truly trying to tell you right now, today, in this moment. No joke.
      But how'd the universe come up with all the variables to get you to play the same song every time you live this life and play this guessing game?

    • @clidelivingston
      @clidelivingston Рік тому

      When intelligent people run out of things to analyze they start making up stuff like determinism vs randomness.

    • @calebblack1420
      @calebblack1420 Рік тому +1

      I could shit my pants right now out of free will but I will not because it is gross and stinky.

  • @Shackled
    @Shackled Рік тому +3

    Based on my research in physics this discussion seems to be very accurate for what ur reality could be. Our physics once we fix the fundamentals is completely deterministic and it’s all down to how we need to be treating time as mass.

    • @jaylucas8352
      @jaylucas8352 Рік тому

      Time is the measurement of mass through space. From one point to another in a 3D space is what time is.

  • @MichaelSmith420fu
    @MichaelSmith420fu Рік тому

    A person can go around saying that they don't like randomness and and if they understand what syntax is and then that's probably what they're talking about but the fact is that you don't know what gravity is what the speed of light is what Mass why it exists.. so that's why I think of information in terms of syntax you know

  • @Kronikalrag3
    @Kronikalrag3 Рік тому +4

    I's a very interesting topic , was thinking the other day about randomness/deterministic in regards to simulation theory , and how at the edge of the observable universe , is there more beyond ? And then i thought well maybe we just cannot observe it which is fine....but what if "Procedural generation" is a factor the closer you get to the edge more "stuff" just loads in???

    • @lean84
      @lean84 Рік тому +1

      And maybe the universe is not only proceduraly generated at the biggers scales, but also at the microscopic scales. When we aquire the technology to look at smaler scales some new stuff always comes up that is consistent with how reality works at higher scales. It is like a fractal, if you look there is always more stuff to look at, the universe always comes up with something that "makes sense".

    • @Kronikalrag3
      @Kronikalrag3 Рік тому

      @@lean84 Good point.

  • @yashiAxen39
    @yashiAxen39 Рік тому +1

    love it :))

  • @jamesstaggs4160
    @jamesstaggs4160 Рік тому

    TLDR of my novel length post below- Everything is one. All separation is an illusion. There is no time, no movement, no death and no objects. Reality at it's most fundamental is a "being" which is totally alone, can't move because it is everything so there's nowhere in which to move, and it's always been that way and will always be that way. Creation is an attempt for "Source" to distract itself from those inescapable realities.
    Like I said below I could be totally wrong, but it's taken decades of looking at everything I can on the subject before I settled on that conclusion.

  • @emsik185
    @emsik185 Рік тому

    I wonder now, why do we even consider these kind of options.. its because we still dont know much abour the universe and ourselves... this is just so crazy... the universe and our existence... just wow... kind regards to all of you my brothers

  • @jaredroder2842
    @jaredroder2842 Рік тому

    inert like the monolith in space odyssey?

  • @josh4844
    @josh4844 Рік тому +3

    What a fucking master at what he does....

  • @cute1678
    @cute1678 Рік тому +1

    'Thinking themselves wise, they became fools'.

  • @plato2030
    @plato2030 Рік тому +1

    Wise analysis of free will. I believe the same. We have minimal free will. Some of us break through Matrix due to being too clever or too brave or having too much ego or being too crazy. But even them you could say these also were planned.

    • @simpsimpson5175
      @simpsimpson5175 Рік тому

      Ego is what keeps you IN THE MATRIX!!

    • @plato2030
      @plato2030 Рік тому

      @@simpsimpson5175 a lot of our flaws or qualities could have both negative or positives effects. it depends on how to harness them towards the ultimate goal. A lot of gods who are worshipped in this world, football gods, rock and pop gods or religious gurus were born with huge egos. Some harnessed it to drive them to do good deeds and some towards destruction.

    • @simpsimpson5175
      @simpsimpson5175 Рік тому

      @@plato2030 I Cant think of one guru with a "huge ego".. ego is the false sense of self and thus keeps one trapped and endlessly incarnating into this archon AI Luciferic simulation "soul trap"- Zero ego connects to ones Higher self which is at the end of time which is also the beginning of time where there is no entropy what we describe as "heaven" the end perfection of Mind/Spirit . If an entity does not evolve to this end of time the entity is not created at the beginning of time [ a they are the same ] and is thus not a soul or point of awareness in the simulation beyond spacetime - but an NPC or holographic backfill in the soultrap sim.. I am guesing this guest of Friedmans is one such backfill - There is free will in the sim.. The "choice" to be happy or suffer

    • @plato2030
      @plato2030 Рік тому +1

      @@simpsimpson5175 very impressive thoughts and beliefs. I’m assuming they’re from your buddhism knowledge but if from other sources please let me know so i can read a brief summary.

  • @BBoldGaming
    @BBoldGaming Рік тому

    Pray

  • @AnderBRO2
    @AnderBRO2 Рік тому

    Video games are using LODs to render complex scenes. I use to think the simulation was impossible due to computing physical things like turbulence, high complexity of interacting particles. But with LODS there's no question life is a simulation.

  • @macdaddy2005
    @macdaddy2005 Рік тому

    dont worry about letting creation know we're here, it made everything, again... made everything! It knows. Sit yourself down and ask yourself this and any other question you may have. I've learnt more about the universe from looking within...

  • @Chuckdiesel86
    @Chuckdiesel86 Рік тому

    What if people make bad choices? Does that mean they're going against the determined outcome?

    • @Bpaynes
      @Bpaynes Рік тому +1

      Define "bad"

  • @odeszarules5125
    @odeszarules5125 Рік тому

    This guy is definitely onto something. What is this ridiculous reality anyway? Feels like a lotta matrix glitching been happening lately. I’m totally serious

  • @aubo4060
    @aubo4060 Рік тому +1

    Imagine if an AGI agent manage to escape the simulation

  • @andrewmiller6272
    @andrewmiller6272 Рік тому

    1. The universe is an infinite agglomeration of energy fields, resembling threads of light.
    2. These energy fields, called the Eagle’s emanations, radiate from a source of inconceivable
    proportions metaphorically called the Eagle.
    3. Human beings are also composed of an incalculable number of the same threadlike energy
    fields. These Eagle’s emanations form an encased agglomeration that manifests itself as a
    ball of light the size of the person’s body with the arms extended laterally, like a giant
    luminous egg.
    4. Only a very small group of the energy fields inside this luminous ball are lit up by a point of
    intense brilliance located on the ball’s surface.
    5. Perception occurs when the energy fields in that small group immediately surrounding the
    point of brilliance extend their light to illuminate identical energy fields outside the ball.
    Since the only energy fields perceivable are those lit by the point of brilliance, that point is
    named “the point where perception is assembled” or simply “the assemblage point.”
    6. The assemblage point can be moved from its usual position on the surface of the luminous
    ball to another position on the surface, or into the interior. Since the brilliance of the
    assemblage point can light up whatever energy field it comes in contact with, when it
    moves to a new position it immediately brightens up new energy fields, making them
    perceivable. This perception is known as seeing.
    7. When the assemblage point shifts, it makes possible the perception of an entirely different
    world - as objective and factual as the one we normally perceive. Sorcerers go into that
    other world to get energy, power, solutions to general and particular problems, or to face
    the unimaginable.
    8. Intent is the pervasive force that causes us to perceive. We do not become aware because
    we perceive; rather, we perceive as a result of the pressure and intrusion of intent.
    9. The aim of sorcerers is to reach a state of total awareness in order to experience all the
    possibilities of perception available to man. This state of awareness even implies an
    alternative way of dying.

  • @josephvolk6243
    @josephvolk6243 Рік тому

    What is the benefit to having illusion of free will?

  • @mrj3217
    @mrj3217 Рік тому

    I've always wondered if we all are small micro organisms living in this huge creature.
    We are so small but dont even know it.

  • @stickyb1t877
    @stickyb1t877 Рік тому +1

    First time I encountered Andrei Karpathy name was in my bachelor degree.
    I had to reproduce one of his papers (kinect for object recognition).
    It was a hell of a ride

  • @ds698
    @ds698 Рік тому

    Is it an exploit or just a law of the physical world we had been unaware of until we figured it out.

  • @supernewuser
    @supernewuser Рік тому

    It's an interesting distinction: are we playing the game or are we inside of it? It is one thing to make mario execute arbitrary code but it is another thing entirely for mario to do it without assistance.

    • @trentkuhn
      @trentkuhn Рік тому +1

      We are the creator playing the game and also the characters it is playing. A game for it to forget that it is everything all at once to experience it. Or we are just npcs in a simulation and there is no game other than code playing itself out.

  • @RJPK94
    @RJPK94 Рік тому +4

    I have always believed that if we are the only ones in the universe (even though the Drake equation says otherwise) then the likelihood is we are simulated.. which scares the crap out of me

    • @djjjjj
      @djjjjj Рік тому

      Why does it scare you? If you are simulated you are still of base reality because what is simulating you must be "real" . The implications of being simulated are positive, you could be infinite and powerful.

    • @Greyalien587
      @Greyalien587 Рік тому +1

      I never cared if this is a simulation or not, from my point of view it don’t matter. I do my 80 years ( hopefully) and then “ log out”
      Edit: geez I realised I sound like the dude from matrix, eating steak in that restaurant.

    • @RJPK94
      @RJPK94 Рік тому +1

      I'm 28 mate I doubt there will be anything left by the time I'm 80 not at this rate with the world leaders

    • @Greyalien587
      @Greyalien587 Рік тому +1

      @@RJPK94 hey , maybe it’s just the end game of the simulation ;-)

    • @RJPK94
      @RJPK94 Рік тому

      We can only hope ;)

  • @User-xyxklyntrw
    @User-xyxklyntrw Рік тому

    When program want to make shortcircuit to hardware

  • @steveclark9934
    @steveclark9934 Рік тому

    Double slit experiment come on exploits let's go!

  • @Gawillamon
    @Gawillamon Рік тому

    The universe is a never-ending, forever expanding mystery. It will never be "solved." It's our flawed human egos that desire to make sense of and "solve" everything.

  • @MichaelSmith420fu
    @MichaelSmith420fu Рік тому

    I have a trippy thing for y'all to consider...
    Every moment you choose not to end your life you also risk the possibility of something super terrible happening such as being captured and tortured. You ever seen that movie law abiding citizen were like the dude like injects the other dude with freaking adrenaline so that he won't pass out when he tortures him? That's the sort of s*** I'm talking about I know it's f***** up and it's dark but it is the truth. How many living things fought the good fight so that we could exist? Every moment that we consciously choose to keep going forward we are actually creating. We are created we create; it shows that we are not individuals because we all pick up each others slack and we all interconnected.

  • @mynameisjeff9124
    @mynameisjeff9124 Рік тому

    Imo if the universe is designed, I don’t think it has exploits, because they surely proved that their algorithms are bug-free mathematically (see Haskell). But it just created itself, then I think it does have loopholes and exploits

  • @DJASHXx
    @DJASHXx Рік тому

    we have came full circle back to the view that we must be noticed by the Gods but its physics this time instead of shouting for valhalla and dying in battle

  • @JayWest14
    @JayWest14 Рік тому

    It seems awfully weird how while we have historical records of past events, a lot of times history is flawed. So everything that happens and our recall this becomes flawed every time we remember it. What if we’re living in a simulation and the simulation is simply a program trying to figure itself out, but because it has bugs, such as false recall, it becomes stuck and rewrites itself and thus we get new civilizations and our recall of our previous lives are lost. Societal amnesia in a sense.

  • @joewright9879
    @joewright9879 Рік тому +1

    The hubris that leads to nemesis.

  • @felix_neko
    @felix_neko Рік тому

    What about mystics, of course not knowing if they are legit. But any sort of enlightenment beyond the physical would fit the description

  • @elchichi
    @elchichi Рік тому

    just here to comment on the talk about the narrative he made about why he raised his arm.

  • @lat6432
    @lat6432 Рік тому +1

    It would be risky project to do something that would make The Architect notice us. How are we gonna be dealt with? As a bug in the system? or random wonder of the simulation that must be preserved? What would happen next? This is a type of project that could be done in the end of the universe when there's no where left to go, as a final attempt of sentient lifeform to preserve it's existence. Until then, progress must be continue in all fields.

    • @LeighRobinsonBushcraft
      @LeighRobinsonBushcraft Рік тому +1

      We don't know how to be quiet and not do it. If it's possible that we can, we will. Let's hope the architect has a sense of humour.

    • @lat6432
      @lat6432 Рік тому +1

      @@LeighRobinsonBushcraft We can apply game theory to determine what measure to take.

  • @stevensmith5873
    @stevensmith5873 Рік тому

    isn't pong a step down from super Mario? I can make a paperweight out of my car. haha

  • @markroden9968
    @markroden9968 Рік тому

    Okay this guy just outroboted Lex 😂😂😂

  • @rick262
    @rick262 Рік тому +4

    Maybe we're supposed to create a QM system to alert the creator to our intelligent presence here. This is what happens when we relate with the universe entirely from mind and we don't directly understand the nature and depth of consciousness. The mind and the simulation are in a subspace of consciousness/creator. And consciousness/creator pervades the simulation and knows your individual mind. To break out of the system we have to be able to go beyond our own minds -- not just create endless pathways through the mind space.

  • @admazzola3569
    @admazzola3569 Рік тому

    What if consciousness drives reality instead of the laws of our reality having created consciousness? In fact I would say that it seems extremely unlikely that consciousness is purely a product of our simple understanding of physics. Consciousness seems too important and fundamental and profound to be merely a byproduct of a system. What if it IS the system?

  • @BradKittelTTH
    @BradKittelTTH Рік тому

    As constantly upgrading, self-modifying bio-electrical computers that operate at light speed, recording on DNA using DHA converting light to energy, and uploading and downloading complex forms of energy controllable through subtle forces. Wii, all the "I"s are able to transmit and receive information from beyond the physical world. Fate seems to prove out that there is some ability to see the future, therefore it must be written

  • @CoreyChambersLA
    @CoreyChambersLA Рік тому

    Everything is nothing. Everything that we believe that we see is information Waves, possibilities,

  • @thewintersessions
    @thewintersessions Рік тому

    My man has never heard of the Tower of Babel