Sorry, the subtitles seem to be taking a while to complete. I should have double checked before publishing - UA-cam has to sync all the timings. Hopefully very shortly - it normally takes about 20 minutes but it's been much longer.
It’s really hard to see the progress bars around the red Bull ring. Might have been better to use brighter colours or add the cars to the graphic. Good video all around though. Thanks for your work.
As ever, this is really interesting, so thank you for that. One thing though, even though I'm watching on a 10" tablet, I couldn't see the colours very well (or at all in places) on the track (the first time you ran them together) the background purple was just too close to the other colours. I know that you like to keep your "brand colours" on screen, and I understand why, but a pale grey representing the tarmac would have been _much_ easier to see (a little paler than the second track for both would be great). Sorry, I don't like saying negative things, but I just couldn't see something I was interested in. Thanks again for the video, though, I did enjoy it.
The broadcasters that I have seen never mention how the W car performs compared to the other series. I thought the W-series took place in F2 equipment. Why aren't they in an F2-level car if the winner of the series is meant to drive in F1?
Interesting video but a small criticism: The car colours -when on the track - were often a bit hard to see (as a mobile user). Especially in the end they all blended with the background a lot. Maybe make them a bit more striking in the future or something?
Especially for the first whole track scene I lost track of the cars fairly quickly dots would be really helpful. For the scenes with the cars represented change colors or maybe make the cars larger (not to scale)
Wow! I can't even imagine how much work it would have taken to get the car's position for each time frame through those corners towards the end of the video. Thank you for the work!
@@dhupee Loads of boost. BMW used old 2002 1,5l i4 cast iron blocks with at least 60 000 km in them and a tons of boost at middle of 80's and they produced some 1500hp at quali trim..
The graphic at around 6:55 was really hard to follow for me as with such a zoomed out view of the track with only a tiny line passing/changing color, I lost track of it really easily. It would have been helpfull if all cars had a bigger dot on them with high contrast to the dark track. The same is true for the graphic at 12:30 though it's less pronounced here, because the view is not quite as zoomed out. The comparison of the different series was interesting to watch though. I really liked the structure of the video and that you first layed out the differences of the cars/drivers and what those differences could potentially mean, before taking it to the lap and seeing the differences play out!
I think it's awesome you included F3 and W series, I do hope the later is able to get more funding for quicker cars and a larger grid, maybe even a feeder series.
Hey, I'd love to have a new shot at this, with all 4 series having raced at the 2022 Spanish GP. Spain would also offer a great comparison for all types of corners
Probably not, because Formula E don't run the full circuit. They're probably halfway between W series and F3, maybe a bit on the slower side of halfway. Edit: I guess they do run the full track now in 2021; but at a 1:34 fastest lap they're probably in the swimming pool chicane while the F1 cars are finishing a lap.
I can't imagine the amount of work it took to put this together. I'd love to see a video where you show how you put together one or two of these graphics.
Top quality video! Very informative. Just small suggestion - cars on track comparisons were a bit tricky to read due to colours used and too small car markers.
This comment doesn't really make sense. The graph shows the fastest times of each car in an official timed lap, not on a simulation driven by the same driver. The w series's being slower reflects both the car and the driver
No one even knows exactly how much horsepower an F1 PU produces. It's all guesswork, but 1000 total is an accurate estimate. So it's roughly 800 from the ICE and the rest from the hybrid system. 1160 sounds like WAAAY too much.
Hi CB, with the circus at Silverstone this weekend it reminds me of a topic I'd love to see a video on - the difference between start line and finish line. Why do some tracks separate the two, whilst others don't? Who is responsible for deciding where to place the finish line - is it the track, the FIA, someone else? And what about tracks that have changed the location of their finish line over time (whilst staying on the same straight). Love your work mate!
Very interesting video! Probably my favourite that you've made so far. It would be great to see a publicity stunt IRL like they made a while ago, with a road car, touring car etc doing a lap of Silverstone, with each delayed by their lap-time deficit; all coming together to cross the line almost simultaneously!
Great video as always. Your skill in animation has gotten noticeably better than it was before. Not saying you were bad at all, you have just gotten better! A tiny critique I have is that it's pretty hard to see the cars "driving" on track here. A bit too small and low contrast IMO. A marker following the cars would really help and solve that small problem.
This is really interesting. I'd love to see this, but with non-Global Plathway categories as well. In particular, I think comparing F1, IndyCar, LMP1, DPi, GTE, GT3, and NASCAR at COTA would be really intriguing. Similar comparisons with slightly different sets of cars could be made at a lot of tracks, and it might also be interesting to see which cars do better at different types of tracks, comparing, say, Spa (fast and flowing) vs. Monza (super fast, lots of braking) vs. Albert Park (mostly mid-to-low-speed) vs. Suzuka (variety of speeds, but all very twisty), and perhaps paying particular attention to local categories like Super GT and V8 Supercars.
Great video. Comparing F1 to MotoGP would also be great. Their time would be somewhere between F2 and F3 I think (1:22 pole this year?) but they lose most of that time in the corners and possibly gain on the straights.
Fascinating stuff ... might have also been interesting to compare the efficiency in energy usage between the different formulas. Keep up the great work 👍😀
Damnit James, you need an editor an make a video for every VOD/streaming sessions you have almost daily on twitch. There is so much hilarious and great RP with Siz, Barry, and the others but theyre each 6-8 hours long! Like when the HOA had that meeting in the garage with that new gang steppin on people toes and when you got promoted to selling cars while trying to get other fired. lol. Shits so good but I know their is so many golden moments us fans miss that dont have time to watch your long streams. Much love.
7:20 Your colors are making it really hard for me to see clearly. I kinda wish it was a black background, with pink, yellow, blue, and green for the F1, F2, F3, WS, respectively. The mixing of magenta & red, along with other red/magenta hues makes it a bit hard to tell the difference. Otherwise, I’m quite pleased with your video.
10:25 I think that's actually they are less bad on straights in comparison to the harder corners, not gaining time on the F1 in the straights. It's basically the amount of time they are losing is less in the straights than in the hard corners, but they are still losing time in comparison to F1.
Love your content but can't see the colour differences on track because jm colourblind! Can we have more striking colour differences to help in the future please?
There are younger drivers too. I imagine that it's hard to compile 18-drivers grid of young female drivers at the moment. But who cares. Maybe most of current W-series drivers aren't really on path to F1 but the races are actually quite interesting to watch.
@@SnookerFanPL imo the problem is that F2, F3 drivers have been moved to what is an F4 category. Essentially any new female drivers _cannot_ have a formula career outside of it because women now "belong" in W Series and not in any faster categories that would give them experience and make them more respected.
@@daniellee4003 Why you say so. I suspect that in the future W-series is going to be like Alpine Series - the first formula car a young female driver gets to drive after go-karts. It's free for the driver and if you do well you can earn big money to help fund F4 drive. And there are superlicence points too. For now they had to take older drivers because there were not enough young prospects to fill 18-car grid.
ngl I thought this was going to be more about driver etiquette and not running people off the road rather than raw time. Given what this video actually was, it might have been interesting to include a few other high level motorsport series. MotoGP and DTM both also race at the RB Ring, for example. Also I'll repeat the comments elsewhere that this video is...hard to follow, the colors kind of all just muddle over one another, and zooming in would have helped a lot.
What a great video. Tons of work must have gone into this. It was fascinating and your use of different graph types and re-zeroing to make different points was compelling. The FIA should see this. Maybe there is a case to add a W-series Plus at some point to provide a path for more experienced w-series drivers. How would formula 4 stack up against w-series and f3?
@@jorhop4005 that depends on whether you think there is too large a gap in performance between w-series and F3. I really hope some of the current w-series drivers do get the opportunity to drive in F3.
The colors on track comparison.. i can't see them without focusing intently.. edit: jep.. since i wrote this comment, i had to rewind the video a bit. I honestly could not find the cars until you said the turn number.. and even then i could not find them for few seconds.
This really was a visual mess, ontop of the yellow background and having the gap of cars without the cars being visual it makes everything a nightmare to follow. Also labelling your axis is a must otherwise you'll have to replay the video whilst you're talking instead of glancing at the label.
Thanks for taking the time to make the video. Demonstrates what a huge waste of money F1 is, it is almost comical! Would you be able to run a comparison of the performance analysis against dollars spent? I love F1 but it blows my mind how inefficiently they use their cash with the exception of Force India (Pre Stroll ownership)
Good video. Probably overestimated F1 power by 100BHP or so but doesn't materially change the outcome. A point of note on the relative lack of time loss due to runs to top speed - with the hybrid engines, with a limited by regulation (and just battery size that can fit Vs it's weight penalty) the F1 cars stop deploying full power around 2/3 down the straights. So the peaks of speed are less but the total area under the curve for speed on the straight is higher by accelerating really hard early then tailing it off.
Any idea what the lane is for on the runoff on the outside of T1 at the Red Bull Ring? There is something similar on the outside of the Loop at Silverstone and on a few other tracks.
I'm hoping they lift the W-series to the FIA F3 series spec to put these girls in the spotlight. Right now it's about the same as regional F3 so it's not very easy to compare them for the general public. It's a strong initiative, but still kinda half-assed putting them in a weaker car.
This year’s FE pole time at Monaco would have been good enough for 3rd on the grid in F1 …. in 1967! Wake me up in 50 years when electric gets close to ICE.
This years Porsche Supercup pole was just 3 seconds slower and on the Historic Grand Prix (which is more show than race, let's be honest) Marco Werner in an 1976 Lotus 77 was a tenth faster than the FE pole. It sounds kinda ridiculous but I'm interested in Chain Bear's opinion.
Absolutely, every time you move up a tier it's more difficult. It's why drivers often spend a lot of time in different series, racing as much as possible, before making the jump to F2. If you jump to F2 too quickly, you don't have the experience, and you sink. And if you mess up your shot, it's harder to get another one. Even at F1, people are talking about how Yuki might be at risk if he doesn't get quicker next year, and he's not even having the worst season.
F2 needs to be made slightly faster, to close the gap. Explains why rookie F1 drivers are no match to the drivers who graduated literally even 1 year before them into F1 (Lando and George and way faster than Mick for example).
I would really appreciate a similar video comparing formula 1 and formula e in Monaco. I know formula e is much slower but it would be interesting to know where the differences are.
This is exactly what we do in university. Take some obvious fact, paly with the data back and forth, back and forth, back and forth........then come to an obvious conclusion, and this is a publishable paper. Watching this almost gives me a PTSD. If you want to save 13 min: F1 cars are faster both in straight and corner, the advantage is most prononced in high speed corner because of the downforce. F2 and F3 cars actually have similar grip level, most of the difference comes from power. F2 cars are even slower than F3 and W cars in some coners, it could be a result of weight, length or turbo lag.
From papers I've read, that's why at the start there's usually a page that tells you the conclusion and answer to the question at the start, and then it tells you the process of getting there after. They tell you "here's the conclusion we reached" first, because academic papers do not need to get you over the 10 minute watch time in order to get recommended to people.
I always thought it would have been easier and more economical to run the w series with the EXACT same cars as f3 and use it as a showcase for what women can do. And then maybe a few years later fully integrate the f3 (mens) and W series together so that we can finally see some ladies now in f1. With the w series spec being slower and totally different car how are teams in f3 and f2 supposed to know how great a w series driver is?
Unless they're slower in the full F3 cars. If they were competitive at the same level out of the gates, these drivers wouldn't need to be in the WSeries, they'd have just gone into F3 straight. Clearly something about the jump to F3 was proving more difficult on a technical level, so they're starting them in lighter cars. They're just the F3 Asia cars, and they seem to get opportunities, so driving the lighter, slower car shouldn't be a problem for progression. Guanyu Zhou drove in the Asia series, and he's in F2. It's also not correct to assume progression to F2 and F1 are just F3. Usually those drivers are competing in several different series before they get F3 drives, and even then more multiple series until they get F2. No one's going to get into F1 if the only series they're in is the WSeries, because that's not going to feed straight into F2. It's all about experience, and experience means being in a car you have the experience to drive well, not driving the fastest car. You're more likely to get a shot at a better series winning championships in Kart then finishing last in F3.
Sorry, the subtitles seem to be taking a while to complete. I should have double checked before publishing - UA-cam has to sync all the timings. Hopefully very shortly - it normally takes about 20 minutes but it's been much longer.
It’s really hard to see the progress bars around the red Bull ring. Might have been better to use brighter colours or add the cars to the graphic. Good video all around though. Thanks for your work.
As ever, this is really interesting, so thank you for that. One thing though, even though I'm watching on a 10" tablet, I couldn't see the colours very well (or at all in places) on the track (the first time you ran them together) the background purple was just too close to the other colours. I know that you like to keep your "brand colours" on screen, and I understand why, but a pale grey representing the tarmac would have been _much_ easier to see (a little paler than the second track for both would be great). Sorry, I don't like saying negative things, but I just couldn't see something I was interested in.
Thanks again for the video, though, I did enjoy it.
Can you reclarify the f3 width? You state 1975mm (1990-15) but show 1885mm
The broadcasters that I have seen never mention how the W car performs compared to the other series. I thought the W-series took place in F2 equipment. Why aren't they in an F2-level car if the winner of the series is meant to drive in F1?
Interesting video but a small criticism: The car colours -when on the track - were often a bit hard to see (as a mobile user). Especially in the end they all blended with the background a lot. Maybe make them a bit more striking in the future or something?
I totally agree here, it was also hard to see for me on my pc
If they were represented by dots, it would've been ok
Not hard, impossible. Especially if you have slight colorblindness.
Especially for the first whole track scene I lost track of the cars fairly quickly dots would be really helpful. For the scenes with the cars represented change colors or maybe make the cars larger (not to scale)
Fully agree. Couldn't see a damn thing. Maybe he should have widened the track to make it better visually
Wow! I can't even imagine how much work it would have taken to get the car's position for each time frame through those corners towards the end of the video. Thank you for the work!
Mogus
This is brought to you by skillshare!
I’d love to see a video like this one comparing F1 vs Indycar vs NASCAR at Circuit of the Americas.
That really would be very interesting!
sadly we have to wait another year for the nascar race to rain like crazy, i think
I’d wait till next year when nascar gets a dry cota race
@@LoganHoskinsRacing the next gen might produce great racing too
Vs Australian Supercars
Great video, but the zoomed out hotlaps on track were hard to follow for me. The data after it made up for it :)
"The F1 engine reaches powerlevels of around 1000"
Damn. It's stronger than Raditz
Raditz is 1200
Chain Bear more and more becoming a Data-presentation channel, with an F1 theme. I love it.
W series uses the 1.7T from Alfa?
Cool, never knew that.
Not V4 though (sadly, would've been great to see) so error in the video. It's inline 4.
@@DiGatsby hey, Super Formula use inline 4 and they still fast tho maybe even a bit faster than F2
@@dhupee They are faster than F2 cars on a lap.
@@dhupee Loads of boost. BMW used old 2002 1,5l i4 cast iron blocks with at least 60 000 km in them and a tons of boost at middle of 80's and they produced some 1500hp at quali trim..
The graphic at around 6:55 was really hard to follow for me as with such a zoomed out view of the track with only a tiny line passing/changing color, I lost track of it really easily. It would have been helpfull if all cars had a bigger dot on them with high contrast to the dark track. The same is true for the graphic at 12:30 though it's less pronounced here, because the view is not quite as zoomed out.
The comparison of the different series was interesting to watch though. I really liked the structure of the video and that you first layed out the differences of the cars/drivers and what those differences could potentially mean, before taking it to the lap and seeing the differences play out!
I think it's awesome you included F3 and W series, I do hope the later is able to get more funding for quicker cars and a larger grid, maybe even a feeder series.
Hey, I'd love to have a new shot at this, with all 4 series having raced at the 2022 Spanish GP. Spain would also offer a great comparison for all types of corners
the opacity for the cars is all fuck up. Like they all merge together in the circut graph. it is impossible to see. Probably need a re-upload
cant see a damn thing on the full track map. Dark colors on a dark map on a yellow background? Maybe a skillshare on color theory wouldve helped
Can we get one of these comparisons between Formula 1 and Formula E from Monaco?
Probably not, because Formula E don't run the full circuit. They're probably halfway between W series and F3, maybe a bit on the slower side of halfway.
Edit: I guess they do run the full track now in 2021; but at a 1:34 fastest lap they're probably in the swimming pool chicane while the F1 cars are finishing a lap.
I can't imagine the amount of work it took to put this together. I'd love to see a video where you show how you put together one or two of these graphics.
Top quality video! Very informative. Just small suggestion - cars on track comparisons were a bit tricky to read due to colours used and too small car markers.
I hope this video stops people comparing F3 lap times to w series to say women can't drive
I've seen that SO MUCH last couple of days (especially after a certain Euro 2020 final)
W series stinks regardless of timing
Yeah, I didn't realize they were different spec f3 cars until this season even though I'd never compared lap times
@@seanonraet8327 It's because they use the same models as Asian F3 Series, different from the ones FIA F3 Championship use
This comment doesn't really make sense. The graph shows the fastest times of each car in an official timed lap, not on a simulation driven by the same driver. The w series's being slower reflects both the car and the driver
4:50 Doesn't the 1000 hp of the F1 PU include the 160 hp from the electric motor rather than being 1160?
I was just about to write the same thing.
Short answer no.
No one even knows exactly how much horsepower an F1 PU produces. It's all guesswork, but 1000 total is an accurate estimate. So it's roughly 800 from the ICE and the rest from the hybrid system. 1160 sounds like WAAAY too much.
@@sdsd2e2321 Frig off Cyrus
Yeah, it was a big deal when Mercedes hit 1000 combined hp a couple years ago. I'm pretty sure they haven't found another 160 since then.
This is an epic video!
It was awesome how you explored all those different ways to visualise that data.
Keep up the awesome work!
I watch W Series but it feels sooo slow, they desperately need faster cars
Great work to everyone who worked on this video. I am astonished with the analysis and the delivery.
Holy shit. The presentation of your videos keep getting better and better.
Bro you and nick giving us all the nitty gritty content in the most digestible format all the time I love it
Hi CB, with the circus at Silverstone this weekend it reminds me of a topic I'd love to see a video on - the difference between start line and finish line.
Why do some tracks separate the two, whilst others don't? Who is responsible for deciding where to place the finish line - is it the track, the FIA, someone else? And what about tracks that have changed the location of their finish line over time (whilst staying on the same straight).
Love your work mate!
This was AMAZING, I love data and different graph usage to analyze and display the data. just wow
Seriously blows my mind the quality of content Chain Bear always manages to put out
great use of the available data
My goodness what excellent formatting of complex data. Great job
Very interesting video! Probably my favourite that you've made so far. It would be great to see a publicity stunt IRL like they made a while ago, with a road car, touring car etc doing a lap of Silverstone, with each delayed by their lap-time deficit; all coming together to cross the line almost simultaneously!
Great video as always. Your skill in animation has gotten noticeably better than it was before. Not saying you were bad at all, you have just gotten better!
A tiny critique I have is that it's pretty hard to see the cars "driving" on track here. A bit too small and low contrast IMO. A marker following the cars would really help and solve that small problem.
This is really interesting. I'd love to see this, but with non-Global Plathway categories as well. In particular, I think comparing F1, IndyCar, LMP1, DPi, GTE, GT3, and NASCAR at COTA would be really intriguing. Similar comparisons with slightly different sets of cars could be made at a lot of tracks, and it might also be interesting to see which cars do better at different types of tracks, comparing, say, Spa (fast and flowing) vs. Monza (super fast, lots of braking) vs. Albert Park (mostly mid-to-low-speed) vs. Suzuka (variety of speeds, but all very twisty), and perhaps paying particular attention to local categories like Super GT and V8 Supercars.
I still find it crazy that F1 cars are longer than a LWB S Class...
Video was great as always, loving the various ways of showing the same data.
Great video. Comparing F1 to MotoGP would also be great. Their time would be somewhere between F2 and F3 I think (1:22 pole this year?) but they lose most of that time in the corners and possibly gain on the straights.
The best formula content on UA-cam. This guy is crazy, thanks Stuart!
That was hectic! Well done chain bear!
Love to see this for the new spec cars.
Fascinating stuff ... might have also been interesting to compare the efficiency in energy usage between the different formulas. Keep up the great work 👍😀
Damnit James, you need an editor an make a video for every VOD/streaming sessions you have almost daily on twitch. There is so much hilarious and great RP with Siz, Barry, and the others but theyre each 6-8 hours long! Like when the HOA had that meeting in the garage with that new gang steppin on people toes and when you got promoted to selling cars while trying to get other fired. lol. Shits so good but I know their is so many golden moments us fans miss that dont have time to watch your long streams. Much love.
Awesome breakdown! Great video!
You have really outdone yourself this time
7:20 Your colors are making it really hard for me to see clearly. I kinda wish it was a black background, with pink, yellow, blue, and green for the F1, F2, F3, WS, respectively. The mixing of magenta & red, along with other red/magenta hues makes it a bit hard to tell the difference.
Otherwise, I’m quite pleased with your video.
I was at the British GP. One thing I struck me the most is how the F1 cars just turn like it's nothing.
10:25 I think that's actually they are less bad on straights in comparison to the harder corners, not gaining time on the F1 in the straights. It's basically the amount of time they are losing is less in the straights than in the hard corners, but they are still losing time in comparison to F1.
Love your content but can't see the colour differences on track because jm colourblind! Can we have more striking colour differences to help in the future please?
W Series isn't really a "junior series" Stuart. There are drivers over 30 y/o competing.
Still a junior series, doesn't mean it's for juniors
There are younger drivers too. I imagine that it's hard to compile 18-drivers grid of young female drivers at the moment. But who cares. Maybe most of current W-series drivers aren't really on path to F1 but the races are actually quite interesting to watch.
@@SnookerFanPL imo the problem is that F2, F3 drivers have been moved to what is an F4 category.
Essentially any new female drivers _cannot_ have a formula career outside of it because women now "belong" in W Series and not in any faster categories that would give them experience and make them more respected.
@@daniellee4003 Why you say so. I suspect that in the future W-series is going to be like Alpine Series - the first formula car a young female driver gets to drive after go-karts. It's free for the driver and if you do well you can earn big money to help fund F4 drive. And there are superlicence points too. For now they had to take older drivers because there were not enough young prospects to fill 18-car grid.
Nice video but maybe you could have used a car icon instead of an invisible line going around the track
Patiently waiting for a video on the new car!
ngl I thought this was going to be more about driver etiquette and not running people off the road rather than raw time.
Given what this video actually was, it might have been interesting to include a few other high level motorsport series. MotoGP and DTM both also race at the RB Ring, for example. Also I'll repeat the comments elsewhere that this video is...hard to follow, the colors kind of all just muddle over one another, and zooming in would have helped a lot.
Once again..
Top.
Teir.
Content.
Who needs AWS!? Mighty impressed with the amount of work that must have gone into this.
Great Video.. Thank you
What a great video. Tons of work must have gone into this. It was fascinating and your use of different graph types and re-zeroing to make different points was compelling. The FIA should see this. Maybe there is a case to add a W-series Plus at some point to provide a path for more experienced w-series drivers. How would formula 4 stack up against w-series and f3?
Wouldn’t it make more sense for the more experienced women go into F3 or F2.
@@jorhop4005 that depends on whether you think there is too large a gap in performance between w-series and F3. I really hope some of the current w-series drivers do get the opportunity to drive in F3.
W Series in the slow corners being like "Light is right, boys"
The colors on track comparison.. i can't see them without focusing intently.. edit: jep.. since i wrote this comment, i had to rewind the video a bit. I honestly could not find the cars until you said the turn number.. and even then i could not find them for few seconds.
This really was a visual mess, ontop of the yellow background and having the gap of cars without the cars being visual it makes everything a nightmare to follow.
Also labelling your axis is a must otherwise you'll have to replay the video whilst you're talking instead of glancing at the label.
Great explanation, hope you can do something similar with silverstone!
Thanks for taking the time to make the video. Demonstrates what a huge waste of money F1 is, it is almost comical! Would you be able to run a comparison of the performance analysis against dollars spent? I love F1 but it blows my mind how inefficiently they use their cash with the exception of Force India (Pre Stroll ownership)
Chainbear: The Graphs Edition
Great video. Wondering where you got the data from?
Good video. Probably overestimated F1 power by 100BHP or so but doesn't materially change the outcome.
A point of note on the relative lack of time loss due to runs to top speed - with the hybrid engines, with a limited by regulation (and just battery size that can fit Vs it's weight penalty) the F1 cars stop deploying full power around 2/3 down the straights. So the peaks of speed are less but the total area under the curve for speed on the straight is higher by accelerating really hard early then tailing it off.
A comparison like this on SPA would be super interesting
First Video i watched such a nice and good style for f1 videos
To be honest, the lack of DRS in the W series might be a bless. Even if it's not the fastest car, it might be the funniest to drive and watch.
Any idea what the lane is for on the runoff on the outside of T1 at the Red Bull Ring? There is something similar on the outside of the Loop at Silverstone and on a few other tracks.
Great video, but I almost think too much data is given in a boring fashion
I'm hoping they lift the W-series to the FIA F3 series spec to put these girls in the spotlight. Right now it's about the same as regional F3 so it's not very easy to compare them for the general public. It's a strong initiative, but still kinda half-assed putting them in a weaker car.
Don't you want to create a similar video comparing F1, F2, F3 and FE in Monaco?
This year’s FE pole time at Monaco would have been good enough for 3rd on the grid in F1 …. in 1967!
Wake me up in 50 years when electric gets close to ICE.
This years Porsche Supercup pole was just 3 seconds slower and on the Historic Grand Prix (which is more show than race, let's be honest) Marco Werner in an 1976 Lotus 77 was a tenth faster than the FE pole. It sounds kinda ridiculous but I'm interested in Chain Bear's opinion.
you are the rescaling master
Data is beautiful
Actually during the hotlaps at red bull ring the lines are barely visible
Loved the video
Maybe now compare LMH both hybrid and non hybrid with Typical F1 in Monza? Even though we don't have Monza 2021 yet...but still
Did Porsche Supercup participate at Austria 2021 this year?
With these large gaps in specs between the four series. I wonder if this why a lot of rookies struggle whrn jumping up to upper ties
Absolutely, every time you move up a tier it's more difficult. It's why drivers often spend a lot of time in different series, racing as much as possible, before making the jump to F2. If you jump to F2 too quickly, you don't have the experience, and you sink. And if you mess up your shot, it's harder to get another one. Even at F1, people are talking about how Yuki might be at risk if he doesn't get quicker next year, and he's not even having the worst season.
It's a shame I can only hit like one time. Great work mate.
F2 needs to be made slightly faster, to close the gap. Explains why rookie F1 drivers are no match to the drivers who graduated literally even 1 year before them into F1 (Lando and George and way faster than Mick for example).
I didn't realize the F1s were now as big as a Ford F150
They should just go ahead and make W-series cars the same as F3.
I would really appreciate a similar video comparing formula 1 and formula e in Monaco. I know formula e is much slower but it would be interesting to know where the differences are.
Missed opportunity to use red, blue, orange/yellow, magenta/purple for F1, F2, F3, W Series cars.
“Nintendo 64 seconds” 😂😂
Lol who else heard the car horn in the background at 0:42
Wasn't turn 4 reprofiled this year compared to previous years?
This is exactly what we do in university. Take some obvious fact, paly with the data back and forth, back and forth, back and forth........then come to an obvious conclusion, and this is a publishable paper. Watching this almost gives me a PTSD.
If you want to save 13 min: F1 cars are faster both in straight and corner, the advantage is most prononced in high speed corner because of the downforce. F2 and F3 cars actually have similar grip level, most of the difference comes from power. F2 cars are even slower than F3 and W cars in some coners, it could be a result of weight, length or turbo lag.
From papers I've read, that's why at the start there's usually a page that tells you the conclusion and answer to the question at the start, and then it tells you the process of getting there after. They tell you "here's the conclusion we reached" first, because academic papers do not need to get you over the 10 minute watch time in order to get recommended to people.
Track limits in the last corner!!! jk great video, ty for that^^
9:26 F2, not F1. Just to avoid confusion
9:26 the f2 car
Dallara is an Italian name and is stressed on the second syllable.
I'm on the UA-cam app on Android and no subtitles are available. :(
It was confusing when you mixed up your nouns and percentages.
Amazing and highly illuminating display of information. Lousy color choice, though.
Your graph game is... intimidating.
subtitle button isn't there...
i wish big haded youtubers would not make up their own colours
its PURPLE!!!
F1 is the fastest cornering motorsport. (Or more formally, it has the highest lateral G's)
I always thought it would have been easier and more economical to run the w series with the EXACT same cars as f3 and use it as a showcase for what women can do. And then maybe a few years later fully integrate the f3 (mens) and W series together so that we can finally see some ladies now in f1. With the w series spec being slower and totally different car how are teams in f3 and f2 supposed to know how great a w series driver is?
Unless they're slower in the full F3 cars. If they were competitive at the same level out of the gates, these drivers wouldn't need to be in the WSeries, they'd have just gone into F3 straight. Clearly something about the jump to F3 was proving more difficult on a technical level, so they're starting them in lighter cars. They're just the F3 Asia cars, and they seem to get opportunities, so driving the lighter, slower car shouldn't be a problem for progression. Guanyu Zhou
drove in the Asia series, and he's in F2. It's also not correct to assume progression to F2 and F1 are just F3. Usually those drivers are competing in several different series before they get F3 drives, and even then more multiple series until they get F2. No one's going to get into F1 if the only series they're in is the WSeries, because that's not going to feed straight into F2. It's all about experience, and experience means being in a car you have the experience to drive well, not driving the fastest car. You're more likely to get a shot at a better series winning championships in Kart then finishing last in F3.
awesome
Imagine how amazing F1 cars would be if the FIA stopped faffing about trying to make them slower all the time.
We'd also have way more serious accidents ending in severe injury or death
And you'd have huge budget teams furthering the gaps between each other making for rly boring racing
why is the wseries so small. and why is it also about 40% slower
The f2 looses in the exits because of the turbo