The giraffe story is literally the same as the mainstream evolution would explain it. Those who could reach the leaves and stretched for leaves survived, while those who didn't reach or couldn't reach died off. So you see the giraffe as a species had to reach for millions of years. You would think with that little of food that they had to reach for it, that the giraffe would have gone extinct. With this ideology you would have to assume that trees would keep evolving to grow laves higher of the ground, so that animals couldn't reach them, and animals would have to grow larger necks so that they can reach the leaves. If evolution is true, then we would have 1000 foot trees and 600 foot necks by now.
It is an interesting thought, but wrong. Natural selection acts in all sides.... how could a heart pump blood to a 600 foot body??? So it is right where it could be...as tall as possible to cope with its phisiology.....and all examples you pick will be like that.....
@@MrandMrsLang 100%. And most of evolution is based on assumptions. All I ever hear is assumption after assumption after assumption of assumptions of other assumptions.
I love the energy in the video. really helped me remember lamark. thank you
Ladie's Voice Energy And Confidence Was Fabulous 👍
This is a such a wonderful presentation. I understood very well thank youu so muchhh
very good way , style and management of the content and especially presentation of the content.
Thanks. I love the explanation. Simple and to the point
Thank you!
very well explained and simplified... I have just subscribed,looking forward to learn more complex theories simplified like this... i love it
ua-cam.com/video/CKbLIecXZiw/v-deo.html
Welcome aboard!
your voice amazing it kept me active in the whole video🤩
Amazing 🤩🤩🤩
I loved the way you explained with that intonation
ua-cam.com/video/CKbLIecXZiw/v-deo.html
Thank you so much 😀
Very good, thank you.
In the Biology of Belief, Dr. Lipton claims that he was to a certain extend correct
Great video, thank you very much , note to self(nts) watched all of it 7:15
Superb
Disappointed After Seeing Very Less views on Very Excellent video
Really nice commentary.
This me a lot thank you so much
Thank u
Doesn't the last part kind of relate to evolution by natural selection??
best
Thankyouuu..❤
Welcome!!
I am not a child to speak with me this😅
But you are amazing
@@Abdelhameed1 😅Teacher Mum
The giraffe story is literally the same as the mainstream evolution would explain it. Those who could reach the leaves and stretched for leaves survived, while those who didn't reach or couldn't reach died off. So you see the giraffe as a species had to reach for millions of years. You would think with that little of food that they had to reach for it, that the giraffe would have gone extinct.
With this ideology you would have to assume that trees would keep evolving to grow laves higher of the ground, so that animals couldn't reach them, and animals would have to grow larger necks so that they can reach the leaves. If evolution is true, then we would have 1000 foot trees and 600 foot necks by now.
Hmm. There are a lot of assumptions in this response
It is an interesting thought, but wrong. Natural selection acts in all sides.... how could a heart pump blood to a 600 foot body??? So it is right where it could be...as tall as possible to cope with its phisiology.....and all examples you pick will be like that.....
@@MrandMrsLang 100%. And most of evolution is based on assumptions. All I ever hear is assumption after assumption after assumption of assumptions of other assumptions.
Ladie's Voice Energy And Confidence Was Fabulous 👍