U24 Worlds: USA v. Canada (Men's Final)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 30 вер 2024
  • Watch the United States take on Canada in the Men's Division final at the 2019 WFDF Under-24 World Ultimate Championships!
    Check out our website: www.ultiworld.com
    Like us on Facebook: / ultiworld
    Follow us on Twitter: / ultiworld

КОМЕНТАРІ • 57

  • @NatHsu11
    @NatHsu11 5 років тому +103

    Mike Mackenzie demonstrating the need for referees in ultimate

  • @moschoi
    @moschoi 5 років тому +50

    McKenzie such a horrible sportsmanship here.. so sad

    • @TristanandIsolt
      @TristanandIsolt 4 роки тому

      I had no problem with McKenzie calling foul at 39.12. I'm a US citizen and US fan.

    • @xengthao6823
      @xengthao6823 3 роки тому

      Running while locating the frisbee and making contact accidentally gets called a foul??? Idk if I like that rule at all.

  • @HowIMetGoliath
    @HowIMetGoliath 5 років тому +91

    Opening pull at 25:17, second half at 1:23:35

    • @ridgeh4962
      @ridgeh4962 5 років тому +7

      DrGoliath You’re actually the 🐐.

    • @HowIMetGoliath
      @HowIMetGoliath 5 років тому

      @@ridgeh4962 I'm a goat?

    • @ridgeh4962
      @ridgeh4962 5 років тому +3

      DrGoliath like you know, greatest of all time? Basically I’m thanking you for putting the time stamps lol

    • @HowIMetGoliath
      @HowIMetGoliath 5 років тому +3

      @@ridgeh4962 Ah, I wasn't aware of that particular acronym, but I'll definitely take the compliment :)

  • @doktarr
    @doktarr 5 років тому +64

    Pretty bad foul call at 39:12. Contact is being initiated by the offensive player.
    EDIT: and a similar call from the same player at 2:03:50. You can't throw yourself into the defender and call a foul!

    • @somesinger1575
      @somesinger1575 5 років тому +26

      Then he misses the catch and looks around like it was an obvious foul against him :( Let's not bring soccer flopping into ultimate.

    • @somesinger1575
      @somesinger1575 5 років тому +1

      108:54 too :(

    • @doktarr
      @doktarr 5 років тому +7

      @@somesinger1575 I think the foul call at 1:08:54 is pretty legit, actually. USA player changes direction twice and trips the Canadian receiver. (Also, that's a different player making the call.)

    • @iplaylax22
      @iplaylax22 5 років тому +3

      Horrible call, Canadian veered off his line to initiate contact and pushed off... If he had caught the pass the USA player should have called it.

    • @somesinger1575
      @somesinger1575 5 років тому

      ​@@doktarr I didn't mean it was the same player :) . . . Here's why I don't believe it's a foul by the american at 1:08:54, he's reacting to the offense as he's trying to maintain proximity and the other player seems to trip over his own feet and in fact the canadian dives in front of the american forcing him to take a dive or kick the canadian :) If anything, this is a foul on the canadian.

  • @quesothekid9725
    @quesothekid9725 5 років тому +42

    Long hair needs to learn "incidental contact"

    • @drsch
      @drsch 5 років тому +4

      She probably should.

  • @drsch
    @drsch 5 років тому +34

    Canada, living up to their Ultimate reputation. Being illegally physical, fouling non-stop and being embarrassingly floppy about their own foul calls.
    The lack of spirit Canada shows on a regular basis is embarrassing. Canada, showing how not to play Ultimate Frisbee.

    • @brynmcdougald2418
      @brynmcdougald2418 5 років тому

      drschplatt relax man it’s a game there’s going to be fouls, it just shows that the care about the game. The US wasn’t playing super clean either

    • @jamescovert9461
      @jamescovert9461 5 років тому +5

      @@brynmcdougald2418 a lot cleaner than Canada, including the line call that they conceded to Mackenzie

    • @californiacajun4535
      @californiacajun4535 Рік тому

      It’s just different groups of guys some are nice Canadians like the stereo type and some are hockey player nelk boys who full send and get animated because it is enjoyable to be extra or expressing the belief you’ll get more if you force more deal.

  • @ericwright1096
    @ericwright1096 3 роки тому +4

    1:00:33 underrated bad call never anywhere near the guy he was supposedly gaurding

    • @FOXofOJAI
      @FOXofOJAI 2 роки тому

      Lol he was even making a play on the original thrower. Absolute trash call.

  • @tobiasbrooks8937
    @tobiasbrooks8937 4 роки тому +3

    horrible calls this was hard to watch

  • @VTViEt
    @VTViEt 5 місяців тому +1

    Wow the dominator offence is just crazy

  • @AmBis88
    @AmBis88 5 років тому +29

    I think this sport needs a referee to make it fair

    • @beekyy3310
      @beekyy3310 5 років тому +5

      Samuel Corzo takes away from the game and that’s what observers are there for to settle arguments

    • @iplaylax22
      @iplaylax22 5 років тому +10

      @SamuelCorzo
      @Beekyy - takes away from the game, I disagree immensely. Most athletes are used to having officials in their sport and don’t understand all this chit chat amongst players trying to sort things out. We regularly see bad calls that a referee would never make slow the pace of the game, change momentum etc... this is the age old argument. I understand yours entirely, I get “spirit” I’ve played college mixed and open ultimate, and I would love to have officials in the game and I think it would be an improvement.

    • @jeremybrown3592
      @jeremybrown3592 5 років тому +4

      @@beekyy3310 No observers in WFDF. At the top level, particularly international I see tons of bad calls. 48:23 foul call seems bad to me. American receiver for some reason doesn't even look up at the disk. Canada had disc first and barely any contact. Bad call leads to makeup calls and it ends up chippy.

    • @jeremybrown3592
      @jeremybrown3592 5 років тому

      ua-cam.com/video/KLVxfUkNOjg/v-deo.html

  • @calebkent6706
    @calebkent6706 2 роки тому +1

    What in the white bread no seasoning is goin on here

  • @disccovered6392
    @disccovered6392 5 років тому +10

    58:00 travel? Lol what planet is that guy from where that is a travel?

    • @jeremybrown3592
      @jeremybrown3592 5 років тому +2

      Hm. moved his toe six to eight inches with the tricky heel pivot, then roll to top of foot and dragged another six inches - thats like a foot.

    • @drsch
      @drsch 5 років тому +2

      You're correct. There really wasn't much of a travel whatsoever there.

  • @enzofasoli7610
    @enzofasoli7610 4 роки тому +1

    stra figoo

  • @daltonsteinkamp384
    @daltonsteinkamp384 2 роки тому +2

    One team carried themselves like professionals, and then other acted like a bunch of highschoolers

  • @tacefairy
    @tacefairy 3 роки тому

    1:28:50 "Built like a Cadillac" lmfaooo 🤣🤣🤣

  • @somesinger1575
    @somesinger1575 5 років тому +5

    2:03:02 foot definitely on the line, but I guess the american was just being nice?

    • @MrHardgabi
      @MrHardgabi 3 роки тому

      Well noticed. Hard to see at full speed maybe.

  • @jingwenpang8807
    @jingwenpang8807 5 років тому

    could you upload all the past games please thank you!

    • @ultiworld
      @ultiworld  5 років тому

      All of the games we streamed are available in our video subscription package! More info at ultiworld.com/subscribe

  • @worldwide78128
    @worldwide78128 4 роки тому

    1:13:28

  • @tnt5172
    @tnt5172 4 роки тому +1

    Let’s go Canada 🇨🇦

  • @samlee6604
    @samlee6604 5 років тому +2

    for the last point, 25 was clearly traveled. But nobody called it out...

  • @frankcade1506
    @frankcade1506 5 років тому

    turn at 1:05:05?

  • @Gameboob
    @Gameboob 2 роки тому +2

    29:58-30:08 Interesting failure of Cdn players to orbit their marks in the endzone stack as the disc was moved laterally from the sideline to mid field (although orange cleats who got scored on did switch a couple times).
    31:30, CA does slash play
    32:45, US ho stack sets up 20 yards away
    32:55-33:08, CA #44 gives up a huck while marking. He could see the whole field before setting his mark. Was it the right choice?
    34:30-34:45, CA sets up same slash play. Oddly doesn't opt to throw to 98 who's wide open on the break side. Instead, throws a tough io flick past a poach (bc oddly the handler who caught the disc ran to the open side) to the slashing cutter with a mark trailing him.(They also sets up 20 yards from disc.) They get a nice 15 yarder as the continuation though (from a hectic everyone-strikes moment).
    35:45-36:00, somehow 2 US players cover no one while standing at the front of the endzone stack...
    38:23, Can't understand why CA didn't strike deep right off the bat here (doesn't have the throw??). US is covering only the unders, with two poaches covering the first cut in the open side. Deep wide open. Even just making that deep strike as the first cut would've opened up space to the break side by pulling US #30 deep. Or maybe the whole problem here is CA stacking on the open side?...
    39:10-41:00, worst foul call ever. embarrassing.
    42:10-42:15, US again, two points in a row, messes up coverage of front of stack. (Miscommunication on the switch.) That said, CA played really sloppy the whole point, using the open side to clear most of the time. This last pass to score was the most open CA was all point. The preceding 10 or so passes near the endzone (from 41:35) were not able to advance the disc and score because CA kept clogging the field.
    46:55, US side stack flood play
    50:45, CA sets up some sort of ho stack play (cutter 3 cuts deep then under while C1 and C2 cut across). Handler couldn't break to get it to #3