To try everything Brilliant has to offer-free-for a full 30 days, visit brilliant.org/Weltgeist/ . You’ll also get 20% off an annual premium subscription.
"Lock up the clerics" is not really strong rhetoric 100 years after the French revolution, from an author known as a provocateur. No-one was shocked to read that in 1888.
About philosophers being criminals: I think he just talked about the philosophers like Kant and Schopenhauer - the ”philosopher of life denying” - because I think he viewed philosophers in a pretty decadent way (like: most cases of philosophers are decandent).
Anyone who fails to inform you, of the true location of your "study guide" is going to "give you job in their company". Here's a key, "Attention" (Basically, we miss things even when we look for them. We are easily misled and will follow silly distances in that direction before realizing where we have come. There is no single magic phrase to tell a person to look within but, you must be honest with yourself and learn what human behaviors suck and activly resist doing those things that certaintly suck.) We need help we don't provide habitually/commually/efficiently. We can't fully party, or fully be wild, we can't even be fully enslaved. We should choose badassery because how lame the alternative is.
We are here for the long form content. Keep it up ❤. Please do a video about Nietzsche’s point that love is selfish. I’ve been thinking about this recently and I’d like to see a video on it.
He's right about Martin Luther. As soon as he founded his new church he began selling the very same indulgences that he condemned the Catholic church for doing. Also Martin Luther was pretty terrible human being outside of his work life.
Sounds like he was getting frustrated at the end and not seeing any progress in society. He made the mistake of ramming the adversary one last time with everything he had, or like a legendary hero abandoning his defensive position and wading into a sea of enemies stretching to the horizon, swinging his sword wildly. Well, it was certainly a noble effort. I don't think I'll be joining though.
Great video, as always. I've always read the second proposition as tied to his description of Protestantism as "the most incurable and irrefutable form of Christianity" (Antichrist §61) : Protestantism, contrary to Catholicism, is not tied to an institution, and is at the same time more sentimental and rational than Catholicism. Protestantism gives to each believer the right to read and interpret the Bible, leading to religion becoming a deeply personal, and thus subjective, matter. Concurently, Protestantism (in its Classical forms at least) is a step further in the rationalization of religion (a process, you could argue, that's already started at least with the pre-Socratics) : it rejects the existence of a priestly class, of intermediaries like saints and the Church as a whole, it gives less credit to the supernatural (like miracles), derides religious rites like the sacraments as superstitious, etc. Protestants themselves were at the forefront of the development of historical criticism, at first to challenge Catholic claims, and in the end, against the Bible and the most fundamental dogmas of Christianity themselves. All of this reaches its highest point with the philosophical systems of people like Kant or Hegel : Christianity is stripped of its most ridiculous and irrational concepts, and all that is left is its morality, its linear and teleological view of history, etc. This gives rise to Liberal Christianity, which is indeed irrefutable in a way, because you can't point out to them contradictions in the Bible, the variations of Christian doctrines in history, or any of the "classical" anti-Christian arguments : they would be the first to admit to that, and much more! And yet they still believe, act and talk like Christians! That's why I think Nietzsche say that they should be treated the harshest of all : they know, they are "the closest to science", they have realized that everything that Christianity was built upon was a sham, and yet they still cling to it.
Interesting. I think the big difference between the types of Christianity is actually political/practical. Catholicism supports individual spiritual/encounters with God. Also, the Roman Catholicism, vatican never went away so even to this day the Catholic church owns our name and federal reserve. This is a rabbit hole in itself but Catholic Christianity supports internal wisdom instead of external. This is why Nietzsche liked it more I believe, it is the best practical religion of self actualization. Buddhism is not, it pacifies you and Nietzsche is a fighter that believs in passion-catholic fire!
@@Randomytname1 if answers are subject to a criteria of quality, then their quantity would be an indicator of uncertainty. if answers are not subject to scrutiny then there is no distinction between the one & the many. & thus no logical basis for establishing validity.
@@chillaxer8273The spiritual marrow of Christianity isn't in the tribes and the dogma, but the lived experience of drinking in all the Christian culture. Of testing life's mysteries for yourself. It isn't some static path and the canon was not agreed upon until the late fourth, early fifth century.
Ireland has been dying since casting off the "shackles" of the Catholic Church. Your secular leadership has done a better job of destroying the country than the British ever could.
If one reads Stendhal's Red and the Black one can immediately see that priests are not to be reasoned with. Look at the trouble they caused not only in the book, throughout history.
Really great video! Thanks for posting! My favorite part is @35:23 because I've thought pretty much the same thing, and I had no idea Nietzsche had thought of it too!! Seeing the problem of "an abstraction of an abstraction of an abstraction" is such a profound and key concept for me. I think Max Stirner and Epicurus have pointed this out too. Epicurus because he focuses very much on the whether things are pleasurable or painful, which forces one to pay attention to the concrete, not the abstract. Abstractions don't feel good or bad, but sensations do. And Max Stirner talks about fixed ideas that people sacrifice their lives to which are essentially phantoms or spooks, basically nothing, which means one should focus on the concrete to avoid pointless selfless sacrifice. Those two philosophers is what lead me lead to this idea that apparently Nietzsche has also pointed out. I have much more respect for Nietzsche now than I did before. Also, recently I've been thinking about Satanism being a rather silly and mocking kind of rebellion against religion since Satanist basically reverse or do the opposite of what Christians do. But given that Nietzsche's book is the antichrist and that Christianity is to blame for the true reversal of proper values, Satanism, even though still superficial, makes much more sense to me because its reversal of Christianity isn't necessarily senseless opposition, but setting things proper again.
Of course, but don't forget that school teachers beat priests at that sport. Just saying, cuz no one ever mentions them. Teachers have better PR departments than those who represent "God" nowadays. 🙃
If you read Nietzsche after reading enough Schopenhauer you can actually see the dialectical turmoil of Nietzsche trying to carve out his ideas in opposition to the inspiration of his youth as Schopenhauer clearly had a profound influence on him… Schopenhauer claimed to be the only true Christian philosopher based off of his concept of the DENIAL of the WILL to live in harmony with the monastic asceticism of Christianity…This almost certainly formed Nietzsches life AFFIRMING philosophy and WILL to power through negation. I’ve always found the psychological attitudes of these two philosophers so interesting. I find myself more in agreement with the idealism of Schopenhauer but that’s why I find it so important to read Nietzsche as his materialism challenges the way I think. Brilliant video sir, the antichrist is an amazing book it’s what got me into Nietzsche in the first place
He may also have recognized the connection between the impulse to philosophize and the religious impulse. Philosophy is the seed out of which religions grow.
Long time fan of your work here: do you think you will ever do videos on individual works of Dostoevsky? For example, a thorough breakdown of Crime and Punishment? I personally would love to see that from you, and I know many others would as well. Keep up the great work as always, hope to see more from you soon 🫡
A small correction about your pronunciation of the word: "Chandala". Its orthography is consistent with the English pronunciation of the consonant "Ch". The pronunciation of the word shall therefore be: tɕɐnɖaːlɐ. Cheers!
I didnt realisze the antichrist was released much later. Kind of adds fuel to the same fire they were trying to put out, making a book with that title the "final work" 😅
Not really great for laws. Because laws don't use the word "should." Laws aren't proposals of what ought to be, they're a declaration of what is. A law uses the words "will" and "will not" with the same authoritative, uncompromising inevitability over the civil world as a law of physics does with the natural world. If they were real laws, they'd be "he WILL be ostracized, starved, and driven into every type of desert" not "should be." I think this wording is intentional on Nietzsche's part. So yeah I too think they should be made into official "laws," but they won't be conventional laws since they have no stated means of being enforced. Instead it's more just a poignant message to the ascetic who tries to drag us back into the dark ages, civil society telling them directly "This is what we SHOULD do to you, so be grateful that we don't. Think of that each time you try to spread your sickness to others."
Please write about Nietzsche view on love in Ecce Homo. I really enjoy your videos; Nietzsche is always a stimulating thinker… and very important for the development of the individual individual… I really enjoyed Nietzsche Polemic of the Madman looking for God… one of the most beautiful, wise and ascerbically passages written in any language… even though as Catholic, I disagree with Nietzsche statement that ‘God is dead’, from a literal point of view… I am sure that He enjoyed this passage as well.
Science should not be used to show how small life is, but how gigantic it is. Any human can only exist through the cooperation of trillions of cells, each one of them a sophisticated organic system. Every human is related to one universal common ancestor, from there is a unbroken chain of success that leads to you. If there is something worthy to be called a god, then it is life itself!
I wouldn't say that. Have you tried reading his work? His mind was definitely on another level so it's difficult to judge how strong or weak someone has to be to control a mind like that.
@@Randomytname1 The degradation of morals by the Christian religion, as seen through the lens of Jesus being arrested in a park at night with a boy that has no clothes
@@ChristianLopez-r3b Nitechze was as weak as one can get physically and mentally. A Pure decadent His ideas are fascinating but highly impractical and immoral. If you wanna live in the conditions he proposed go live in North Korea or Afghanistan where powerful individuals operate through brute force.
@Jamhael1 no because magic is "the power of apparently influencing the course of events by using mysterious or supernatural forces" and once something is understood with a theory around it it's no longer the true mystery it's made out to be, nor supernatural - never supernatural - cuz everything is already part of nature's way. There's no supernatural/mysterious force at play with finding out how to make and making paper. What part of today wouldn't seem like "magic" to peasants and yet has an entire line of logic behind it that wasn't achieved through experimentation and retrials, certainly none of which can be attributed or named as just superstitious"magic"
@@Jamhael1 It feels like our society views magic as some sort of horrible word , and there is indeed types of magic where you don't fully understand why it works but it does And even if you do fully understand I don't see no reason to stop thinking of it as magic , to me magic is like a beautiful appreciation of how truly wonderful so many things are.
What is crazy is that I suspect a silent majority knows that religion should be outlawed but have so many friends and family who are believers that they stay silent.
@wtice4632 Well of course actually trying to outlaw religion would be a stupid idea guaranteed to fail. One must only look at the exhaustive attempts from the Soviet Union to realize that. The point I'm trying to make is that eventually, say in three to four hundred years, society should advance to a place where religion is properly classified as the pyramid scheme it is and regulated to a point where it's leaders can no longer prey upon vulnerable people.
@@prismbrandingrealestatebra6301 You're a moron if you think religion is a pyramid scheme and a metaphysics-less materialist philosophy of atheism that has zero epistemological justification is superior. When's the last time you read a nonfiction book in this field, bud? Ever?
@@xravenx24fe this channel is about philosophy not politics no one wants to hear about how much u hate the left and how the right is the only good point of view and that you are on the good side of the political spectrum and are all good both sides do this all the time and politics is just annoying no wants to hear u whine and complain about everything u don’t like being woke it’s just annoying.also not all atheists hold the same views and atheism is not a religion but again it is foolish to argue with a sheep
Nah his most controversial is moron thinking women couldn’t be educated. 🤡 These types were a perfect example of what the Greeks called “falling into a pit of nonsense” in the field of philosophy. “
He's exemplary of the phenomenon, but part of it is just the times. The romanticism age, with lots of new mysticisms in the air. That age that gave us ideas like seances, mesmerism, world ice theory, chiropracty, holistic medicine. Wild part is all those ideas are all still very much alive today. He's still not too far off from say, Schopenhauer. Because he's still looking romantic notions of the Will over cold hard science.
@@LethalBubbles I pretty much feel like the divide between belief is Strongmaning the world and might makes right vs Not that. Nobody belives in the actual uncaring universe really. If anything the sciency people work on Darwinist principles.
@@decadesyearoldthingsreview6595 I think the uncaring universe went out of vogue with Kierkegaard, Dostoevsky, Camus, etc. IMO, it throws the baby out of the bathwater a bit because leap of faith stuff just hand waves away the need for theology to make sense, or from the other point of view it splits off reason from moral and psychological matter which is the exact opposite of say, Plato, who saw his Pythagorean mysticism as a real thing and not a matter of faith. The same holds true for Darwinists. I find many including Richard Dawkins uses Darwin genetics as a basis of a sort of mystical doctrine that uses hierarchy and biological knowledge to attach existing morality. It. avoid tackling the "why", resulting in having Christian morality even though the person doesn't believe in God. To their credit though, biology is very strong thing to anchor their Christian ethics onto. Ancient pagans, and indigenous peoples look at the world way differently, and those form the basis of our culture under each regional Christianity variant. For example Marxism too has a Christian flavor in it's ethics and its historical predictions, even though it say religion is the opiate of the people. If someone really wants to leave religion behind, they'd have to reexamine moral philosophies. It's that way whether you believe in God or not. Leap of faith doctrines get people out of this dilemma, and have God be this thing they do on Sundays then go back to the market place, much like Nietzsche says in his parables about the death of god and the Revelation from Zarathustra. I should note if someone really wants to strongman the world in terms of nature or people, it's not hard to find scriptural support to do so. It's not hard to just abandon it and declare a might is right doctrine either. The opposite is true too, piety bring out our empathy, but also so does skepticism. I'm not a huge fan of Nietschze's might meets right moral philosophy, but it is at least an attempt, and coming from his noticing real systemic evils in the world. Important not to swing too far into the other direction. That "slave mentality" stuff is a really interesting dichotomy because if everyone had that "slave mentality" then we wouldn't have tyrants who end up destroying themselves, but at the same time a corrupt religious authority is quite empowered by that. I actually think what's more important than his moral philosophy is his one-world escatology. He really wants people to care about the life that they at least know they have.
@@Sulam-oraita is this guy that knows ancient Greek he does stuff about it on UA-cam I'm not claiming I have any proof its not real but he made a lot of convincing points.
Nietszche is one of the most delicious hypocrites and this is part of his appeal. He does philosophy with a hammer, and shatters his own mirror in the process.
He was a servicemen in the Prussian army and only stopped due to injuries only to continue on to work as a medical orderly for the same military within five years. He probably did far more than you my dude
his sister was editor-on-a-mission controlling all his manuscripts, published & not... estranged from him prior to his collapse . the story of The Will To Power is complicated by his checking out, leaving much unguided, incomplete. but, Publish We Must. the wiki entry is a helpful intro. in context WTP is a fine read (his aphoristic style helps), if flawed by Nietzsche's fate. modernity could've used a few more decades of his efforts.
I have an addendum. The image of Christ should be removed from all churches, and an image of Bacchus should be added in its place. This way, the Christians will be able to behold their actual god.
@@JHimminy No. Dyonisus is also a God of prophecies, of revelation. Plato himself associated a certain kind of madness with him. Nietzsche himself identified as him. He wrote poems to him. And the greeks identified the Hebrew god as him. Later, during Vespasian's time, coins commemorating the defeat of their rebellion showed their god defeated with BACCHUS JUDAEUS written, as that was the Interpretatio Romana of it.
"The criminal of criminals is consequently the philosopher" so he is acknowledging he is the criminal using weak dialectic to convince other weak individuals
Consider the decagram material above spirit and spirit above material , it is true that we are eternal spirits operating temporary bodies , but why would you not use the body while you have it the real way to be happy in this life is to find a balance between material and spirit you don't want to be some neurotic materialistic atheist type that laments everyday as one step closer to his end , and you don't want to be some priest hiding from Life chanting until you die .
Its crazy how people will jump to follow Nitchze....who probrably hates you for being weak.....and be reluctantant to follow Jesus, who loves you regardless......its mind boggling....
Honestly, after all the thought in my life, I've concluded people dismiss God mostly because they believe the world to be disordered or wrong, thus elevating their own wisdom above God. They think they're smarter than God could ever be, how can you reason with that? It's impossible.
Nietzsche observes the law of nature. there is no such thing in nature as unconditional love so only way for that to be the truth would be jesus but the evidence is weak
To try everything Brilliant has to offer-free-for a full 30 days, visit brilliant.org/Weltgeist/ . You’ll also get 20% off an annual premium subscription.
"Lock up the clerics" is not really strong rhetoric 100 years after the French revolution, from an author known as a provocateur. No-one was shocked to read that in 1888.
Almost no one read it to begin with probably
Nietzsche's writing style is crazier than most of the Twitter posts.
You re comparing mediocre people with a genius
About philosophers being criminals: I think he just talked about the philosophers like Kant and Schopenhauer - the ”philosopher of life denying” - because I think he viewed philosophers in a pretty decadent way (like: most cases of philosophers are decandent).
Exactly. Weltgeist's explanation is a stretch, and entirely unnecessary.
Anyone who fails to inform you, of the true location of your "study guide" is going to "give you job in their company".
Here's a key, "Attention"
(Basically, we miss things even when we look for them. We are easily misled and will follow silly distances in that direction before realizing where we have come. There is no single magic phrase to tell a person to look within but, you must be honest with yourself and learn what human behaviors suck and activly resist doing those things that certaintly suck.)
We need help we don't provide habitually/commually/efficiently.
We can't fully party, or fully be wild, we can't even be fully enslaved.
We should choose badassery because how lame the alternative is.
We are here for the long form content. Keep it up ❤. Please do a video about Nietzsche’s point that love is selfish. I’ve been thinking about this recently and I’d like to see a video on it.
Noted!
You took the words right out of my mouth!
He's right about Martin Luther. As soon as he founded his new church he began selling the very same indulgences that he condemned the Catholic church for doing. Also Martin Luther was pretty terrible human being outside of his work life.
Sounds like he was getting frustrated at the end and not seeing any progress in society. He made the mistake of ramming the adversary one last time with everything he had, or like a legendary hero abandoning his defensive position and wading into a sea of enemies stretching to the horizon, swinging his sword wildly. Well, it was certainly a noble effort. I don't think I'll be joining though.
He at least dared...
@@Jamhael1 true, cant call him a hypocrite. he practiced what he preached to the end and it seems to have cost him his sanity.
@Endymion766 nah - he got syphilis.
@@Endymion766 I am wondering what cost YOU your sanity.
@@paulalexander2740 I realized losing my mind was the only way to come back to my senses.
i didnt know nietzsche went mad
thats metal af
In a world of sheep, being a wolf is considered a disease.
@@Jamhael1 Being a vegetable is also a disease.
@@Jamhael1Kindness costs nothing ya jew
@@Jamhael1no bro he was still crazy.
@@trvst5938 syphilis is a hell of a drug...
Great video, as always. I've always read the second proposition as tied to his description of Protestantism as "the most incurable and irrefutable form of Christianity" (Antichrist §61) : Protestantism, contrary to Catholicism, is not tied to an institution, and is at the same time more sentimental and rational than Catholicism. Protestantism gives to each believer the right to read and interpret the Bible, leading to religion becoming a deeply personal, and thus subjective, matter. Concurently, Protestantism (in its Classical forms at least) is a step further in the rationalization of religion (a process, you could argue, that's already started at least with the pre-Socratics) : it rejects the existence of a priestly class, of intermediaries like saints and the Church as a whole, it gives less credit to the supernatural (like miracles), derides religious rites like the sacraments as superstitious, etc. Protestants themselves were at the forefront of the development of historical criticism, at first to challenge Catholic claims, and in the end, against the Bible and the most fundamental dogmas of Christianity themselves. All of this reaches its highest point with the philosophical systems of people like Kant or Hegel : Christianity is stripped of its most ridiculous and irrational concepts, and all that is left is its morality, its linear and teleological view of history, etc. This gives rise to Liberal Christianity, which is indeed irrefutable in a way, because you can't point out to them contradictions in the Bible, the variations of Christian doctrines in history, or any of the "classical" anti-Christian arguments : they would be the first to admit to that, and much more! And yet they still believe, act and talk like Christians! That's why I think Nietzsche say that they should be treated the harshest of all : they know, they are "the closest to science", they have realized that everything that Christianity was built upon was a sham, and yet they still cling to it.
Wow, very interesting historical process you present here.
How does a variation of answers have anything to do with a proposition's truth or validity
Interesting. I think the big difference between the types of Christianity is actually political/practical.
Catholicism supports individual spiritual/encounters with God. Also, the Roman Catholicism, vatican never went away so even to this day the Catholic church owns our name and federal reserve.
This is a rabbit hole in itself but Catholic Christianity supports internal wisdom instead of external. This is why Nietzsche liked it more I believe, it is the best practical religion of self actualization.
Buddhism is not, it pacifies you and Nietzsche is a fighter that believs in passion-catholic fire!
@@Randomytname1 if answers are subject to a criteria of quality, then their quantity would be an indicator of uncertainty. if answers are not subject to scrutiny then there is no distinction between the one & the many. & thus no logical basis for establishing validity.
@@chillaxer8273The spiritual marrow of Christianity isn't in the tribes and the dogma, but the lived experience of drinking in all the Christian culture. Of testing life's mysteries for yourself.
It isn't some static path and the canon was not agreed upon until the late fourth, early fifth century.
I’m Irish, I can vouch for the validity of his statement
Ireland has been dying since casting off the "shackles" of the Catholic Church.
Your secular leadership has done a better job of destroying the country than the British ever could.
Nietzsche's most radical idea: being a proto-redditor. Wow!
@@notillatallbased , TJD
@@GotMitUns768based, got xitter?
Am I banned from commenting
If one reads Stendhal's Red and the Black one can immediately see that priests are not to be reasoned with. Look at the trouble they caused not only in the book, throughout history.
Great book
Surely militant reddit athiesm is less cringe....
Really great video! Thanks for posting! My favorite part is @35:23 because I've thought pretty much the same thing, and I had no idea Nietzsche had thought of it too!! Seeing the problem of "an abstraction of an abstraction of an abstraction" is such a profound and key concept for me. I think Max Stirner and Epicurus have pointed this out too. Epicurus because he focuses very much on the whether things are pleasurable or painful, which forces one to pay attention to the concrete, not the abstract. Abstractions don't feel good or bad, but sensations do. And Max Stirner talks about fixed ideas that people sacrifice their lives to which are essentially phantoms or spooks, basically nothing, which means one should focus on the concrete to avoid pointless selfless sacrifice. Those two philosophers is what lead me lead to this idea that apparently Nietzsche has also pointed out. I have much more respect for Nietzsche now than I did before.
Also, recently I've been thinking about Satanism being a rather silly and mocking kind of rebellion against religion since Satanist basically reverse or do the opposite of what Christians do. But given that Nietzsche's book is the antichrist and that Christianity is to blame for the true reversal of proper values, Satanism, even though still superficial, makes much more sense to me because its reversal of Christianity isn't necessarily senseless opposition, but setting things proper again.
Yes please do a video on Nietzsche’s view on love!
Bet they were kiddeling dids then too.
not all of them
Of course, but don't forget that school teachers beat priests at that sport. Just saying, cuz no one ever mentions them. Teachers have better PR departments than those who represent "God" nowadays. 🙃
Atheists too
i mean as skeptic, i will try to hold them power too cause im not afraid of anything and theres no such things as universal moral
If they do it now they did it even more then. Not all tho
If you read Nietzsche after reading enough Schopenhauer you can actually see the dialectical turmoil of Nietzsche trying to carve out his ideas in opposition to the inspiration of his youth as Schopenhauer clearly had a profound influence on him…
Schopenhauer claimed to be the only true Christian philosopher based off of his concept of the DENIAL of the WILL to live in harmony with the monastic asceticism of Christianity…This almost certainly formed Nietzsches life AFFIRMING philosophy and WILL to power through negation. I’ve always found the psychological attitudes of these two philosophers so interesting. I find myself more in agreement with the idealism of Schopenhauer but that’s why I find it so important to read Nietzsche as his materialism challenges the way I think.
Brilliant video sir, the antichrist is an amazing book it’s what got me into Nietzsche in the first place
Can you do a video on the overlap between Stirner and Nietszche?
A Weltgeist video, hell yeah🎉🎉😅
I dunno what I'd give for a video about Nietzsche on love
He may also have recognized the connection between the impulse to philosophize and the religious impulse. Philosophy is the seed out of which religions grow.
Long time fan of your work here: do you think you will ever do videos on individual works of Dostoevsky? For example, a thorough breakdown of Crime and Punishment? I personally would love to see that from you, and I know many others would as well. Keep up the great work as always, hope to see more from you soon 🫡
It's nice to see videos made by somebody who actually understands Nietzsches work! It's also very rare to see
If sheep weren't so stupid there wouldn't even be an Antichrist. What is it with you Beast? Why can't we all just get along?
are you some sort of globalist? not everyone should "get along"
This is a misinterpretation of what he wrote.
I have never has so much admiration for someone I agree with so strongly as Nietzsche.
You knwo what i red in thumnail? "Prettiest should locked up"🤣🤣
Another fantastic video! Although this is a little bit pedantic, the word Chandala is pronounced with a ch sound, much like chair
Thanks for that!
"Are you a cleric or something . . . they're all the same, those rotten clerics."
- Trusty Patches
Would Brilliant really have saved Nietzsche's sanity?
Radical comes from latin 'root'. It means fundamental.
It means you mean business.
The staggering amount of adds made it hard to follow.
What Christianity? Whose version? What era? There are more interpretations of Christianity than there are individuals.
He was right about everything once again.
A small correction about your pronunciation of the word: "Chandala". Its orthography is consistent with the English pronunciation of the consonant "Ch". The pronunciation of the word shall therefore be: tɕɐnɖaːlɐ. Cheers!
Thanks!
Thanks for your digging.
I didnt realisze the antichrist was released much later. Kind of adds fuel to the same fire they were trying to put out, making a book with that title the "final work" 😅
Wat sprech deutsch 😂😂😂
I am in favor of his proposal. I mean, a good idea is a good idea!
Not really great for laws. Because laws don't use the word "should." Laws aren't proposals of what ought to be, they're a declaration of what is. A law uses the words "will" and "will not" with the same authoritative, uncompromising inevitability over the civil world as a law of physics does with the natural world. If they were real laws, they'd be "he WILL be ostracized, starved, and driven into every type of desert" not "should be." I think this wording is intentional on Nietzsche's part. So yeah I too think they should be made into official "laws," but they won't be conventional laws since they have no stated means of being enforced. Instead it's more just a poignant message to the ascetic who tries to drag us back into the dark ages, civil society telling them directly "This is what we SHOULD do to you, so be grateful that we don't. Think of that each time you try to spread your sickness to others."
Ummmm no...
Please write about Nietzsche view on love in Ecce Homo.
I really enjoy your videos; Nietzsche is always a stimulating thinker… and very important for the development of the individual individual…
I really enjoyed Nietzsche Polemic of the Madman looking for God… one of the most beautiful, wise and ascerbically passages written in any language… even though as Catholic, I disagree with Nietzsche statement that ‘God is dead’, from a literal point of view… I am sure that He enjoyed this passage as well.
You think God enjoyed an atheist spreading disbelief? Ffs you Catholics really are lost, you'd praise a murderer for killing a rude man
Science should not be used to show how small life is, but how gigantic it is.
Any human can only exist through the cooperation of trillions of cells, each one of them a sophisticated organic system.
Every human is related to one universal common ancestor, from there is a unbroken chain of success that leads to you.
If there is something worthy to be called a god, then it is life itself!
Please do make an episode on romantic love
A man driven mad by his own thoughts is truly weak
true
He never said his strong. Simply as an observer warning others.
Over a century later and christcucks are still coping because Nietzsche roasted their previous faith
I wouldn't say that. Have you tried reading his work? His mind was definitely on another level so it's difficult to judge how strong or weak someone has to be to control a mind like that.
Nietzsche was having a reddit moment.
Nietzsche would be appalled by reddit, and every other internet echo chamber for that matter
Nietzsche never had a grip on reality to begin with......
No serious philosopher ever said good about Xtianity 😂 really we are sinners?
I love Nietzsche already
On your deathbed, rational or not, you won't.
@@gwenminor9244 Whatever makes you feel good about believing in an old man watching from the sky buddy
@@orchidhealth2097reddit is down the hall.
@@orchidhealth2097 When did I say I believed in God? Oh, right, never.
@ you certainly sound like a true believer
Love your videos thank you.
What was Jesus doing? (Mark 14:51-52)
I wonder what Nietzche made of it.
What is this in reference to?
@@Randomytname1 The degradation of morals by the Christian religion, as seen through the lens of Jesus being arrested in a park at night with a boy that has no clothes
@Randomytname1 Angry atheists try to paint Jesus as a deviant based on two cherry picked verses. It's cringe
@xravenx24fe oh yes, he hangs out with pimps, prostitutes and human traffickers because he's just a nice guy
@@xravenx24fe if by deviant you mean uhh homosexual then that says more about you than anything
I'd say his most radical (and idiotic) idea is that "the weak should perish" and that we should help them do this.
if we lived in the wild, nature would make them perish on their own
That's not radical. Spend more time in nature and you'll see why.
@@WorsdierDo you still live in jungle? Good for you. 😂
Why would we have a conversation with a rotting infected limb over whether we should or shouldn't cut it off lol.
@@ChristianLopez-r3b Nitechze was as weak as one can get physically and mentally.
A Pure decadent
His ideas are fascinating but highly impractical and immoral. If you wanna live in the conditions he proposed go live in North Korea or Afghanistan where powerful individuals operate through brute force.
I am in the process of making "ascension" an expletive. 😊
Damn what
👏🙂
Great video
32:00 An Interesting Idea
Science is like a mad seeker who seeks magic finding it constantly,
only to look it in the eyes call It by another name and say I haven't found it .
Magic is real indeed brother. Some call it chemistry and some call it mathematics. Perhaps intuition?
Its all under magic if you truly open your eyes
When you finally understand how a thing works, is indeed magic?
@Jamhael1 no because magic is "the power of apparently influencing the course of events by using mysterious or supernatural forces" and once something is understood with a theory around it it's no longer the true mystery it's made out to be, nor supernatural - never supernatural - cuz everything is already part of nature's way. There's no supernatural/mysterious force at play with finding out how to make and making paper. What part of today wouldn't seem like "magic" to peasants and yet has an entire line of logic behind it that wasn't achieved through experimentation and retrials, certainly none of which can be attributed or named as just superstitious"magic"
@@chillaxer8273 there's many many types of magic there's even the kind that many would say is the real kind where you get spirits to do stuff .
@@Jamhael1 It feels like our society views magic as some sort of horrible word , and there is indeed types of magic where you don't fully understand why it works but it does
And even if you do fully understand I don't see no reason to stop thinking of it as magic , to me magic is like a beautiful appreciation of how truly wonderful so many things are.
Did the priests give the verdict of insanity?
Yes, please expand
What is crazy is that I suspect a silent majority knows that religion should be outlawed but have so many friends and family who are believers that they stay silent.
soyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
Outlaw religion and most people will deify state power. Thats extremely dangerous. You should think harder
@wtice4632 Well of course actually trying to outlaw religion would be a stupid idea guaranteed to fail. One must only look at the exhaustive attempts from the Soviet Union to realize that. The point I'm trying to make is that eventually, say in three to four hundred years, society should advance to a place where religion is properly classified as the pyramid scheme it is and regulated to a point where it's leaders can no longer prey upon vulnerable people.
@@prismbrandingrealestatebra6301 lol ok edgelord. You also just described any govt.
@@prismbrandingrealestatebra6301 You're a moron if you think religion is a pyramid scheme and a metaphysics-less materialist philosophy of atheism that has zero epistemological justification is superior. When's the last time you read a nonfiction book in this field, bud? Ever?
I mean, it’s not a bad idea for the most part
43:01 thanks but don't worry. The things you make instead of it are also brilliant and satisfactory!!
Hunger is the best sauce said by Cervantes
The OG edgelord
No, that would be Diogenes
I always assumed his wacky sister corrupted these, before their release.
Not this part in particular
"God is dead." Signed Nierzsche.
"Nietzsche is dead." Signed God.
""Nietzsche is dead" said God" said the dogmatic believer
Cringe
@eliasbonafe9236 You believe in dogma, just a different flavor lol. Can you answer what a woman is?
Yeah im suprised a human was not Immortal...
@@xravenx24fe this channel is about philosophy not politics no one wants to hear about how much u hate the left and how the right is the only good point of view and that you are on the good side of the political spectrum and are all good both sides do this all the time and politics is just annoying no wants to hear u whine and complain about everything u don’t like being woke it’s just annoying.also not all atheists hold the same views and atheism is not a religion but again it is foolish to argue with a sheep
first
Welcome
Nah his most controversial is moron thinking women couldn’t be educated. 🤡 These types were a perfect example of what the Greeks called “falling into a pit of nonsense” in the field of philosophy.
“
You know he’s quoting the same Greeks as you when he says that?
Listen to
the dead sing your requiem🎶
Listening
I sorry to go prophane but more and more I hear about Nietzsche the more he sounds like the uncle with too much time
He's exemplary of the phenomenon, but part of it is just the times. The romanticism age, with lots of new mysticisms in the air. That age that gave us ideas like seances, mesmerism, world ice theory, chiropracty, holistic medicine. Wild part is all those ideas are all still very much alive today. He's still not too far off from say, Schopenhauer. Because he's still looking romantic notions of the Will over cold hard science.
@@LethalBubblesworld ice theory is trash.
@@LethalBubbles I pretty much feel like the divide between belief is Strongmaning the world and might makes right vs Not that. Nobody belives in the actual uncaring universe really. If anything the sciency people work on Darwinist principles.
@@decadesyearoldthingsreview6595 I think the uncaring universe went out of vogue with Kierkegaard, Dostoevsky, Camus, etc. IMO, it throws the baby out of the bathwater a bit because leap of faith stuff just hand waves away the need for theology to make sense, or from the other point of view it splits off reason from moral and psychological matter which is the exact opposite of say, Plato, who saw his Pythagorean mysticism as a real thing and not a matter of faith.
The same holds true for Darwinists. I find many including Richard Dawkins uses Darwin genetics as a basis of a sort of mystical doctrine that uses hierarchy and biological knowledge to attach existing morality. It. avoid tackling the "why", resulting in having Christian morality even though the person doesn't believe in God. To their credit though, biology is very strong thing to anchor their Christian ethics onto.
Ancient pagans, and indigenous peoples look at the world way differently, and those form the basis of our culture under each regional Christianity variant. For example Marxism too has a Christian flavor in it's ethics and its historical predictions, even though it say religion is the opiate of the people. If someone really wants to leave religion behind, they'd have to reexamine moral philosophies. It's that way whether you believe in God or not. Leap of faith doctrines get people out of this dilemma, and have God be this thing they do on Sundays then go back to the market place, much like Nietzsche says in his parables about the death of god and the Revelation from Zarathustra.
I should note if someone really wants to strongman the world in terms of nature or people, it's not hard to find scriptural support to do so. It's not hard to just abandon it and declare a might is right doctrine either. The opposite is true too, piety bring out our empathy, but also so does skepticism. I'm not a huge fan of Nietschze's might meets right moral philosophy, but it is at least an attempt, and coming from his noticing real systemic evils in the world. Important not to swing too far into the other direction. That "slave mentality" stuff is a really interesting dichotomy because if everyone had that "slave mentality" then we wouldn't have tyrants who end up destroying themselves, but at the same time a corrupt religious authority is quite empowered by that. I actually think what's more important than his moral philosophy is his one-world escatology. He really wants people to care about the life that they at least know they have.
@@LethalBubbles Truthful words. I will take time to consider this. But you have been heard.
The original title in modern time is still too provocative shhh 🤫
We can't have our coffee with cream or even imitation coffee creamer substitute?
Sorry!
You're a cow, aren't you supposed to provide the milk?
Ammon claims that Hebrew isn't even a real language .
What do you mean I know Hebrew biblical and modern I can assure you is very deep and perfect
Neither is Latin
@@Sulam-oraitamodern hebrew was created from arabic. Its artificial.
@@thadtuiol1717 I don't know about that I love Latin it sounds so cool
@@Sulam-oraita is this guy that knows ancient Greek he does stuff about it on UA-cam I'm not claiming I have any proof its not real but he made a lot of convincing points.
It's also hilarious how he keeps putting down talking when he's literally a philosopher that's all he does.
Nietszche is one of the most delicious hypocrites and this is part of his appeal. He does philosophy with a hammer, and shatters his own mirror in the process.
He was a servicemen in the Prussian army and only stopped due to injuries only to continue on to work as a medical orderly for the same military within five years. He probably did far more than you my dude
@@ayathados6629 Lol fr, it sounds empty when people challenge his work ethic, masculinity, etc.
Spanish translation, nice
But....then who will systematically abuse the children?
those who do metzitzah b'peh
Public school teachers, coaches, militant redditors....
Do they abuse children because they are religious or is it because they are gay?
LMAO so Nietzsche basically became a slave-morality advocate.
Apparently we really do become what we hate xd
I thought this last book was shown to be a forgery written by his sister ?
his sister was editor-on-a-mission controlling all his manuscripts, published & not... estranged from him prior to his collapse . the story of The Will To Power is complicated by his checking out, leaving much unguided, incomplete. but, Publish We Must. the wiki entry is a helpful intro. in context WTP is a fine read (his aphoristic style helps), if flawed by Nietzsche's fate. modernity could've used a few more decades of his efforts.
based, ngl
I'm pretty much against all philosophy and religion think for yourself and question everything.
Philosophy is thinking and reasoning
careful ... you might end up questioning yourself.
I'm pretty sure there have been 4000 other Philosophers who've said the same thing but ok
And what are you going to do to those who disagree with you?
Nietzsche is a mad man. No wonder he died from his madness.
What's your proof behind this statement. even Jesus said never to call anyone teacher or rabbi because you have only one teacher.
I have an addendum. The image of Christ should be removed from all churches, and an image of Bacchus should be added in its place. This way, the Christians will be able to behold their actual god.
Do you mean they worship drunken madness?
No legitimate scholar of the Bible or history believes in this nonsense
Redditor moment. Cringe
@@JHimminy No. Dyonisus is also a God of prophecies, of revelation. Plato himself associated a certain kind of madness with him. Nietzsche himself identified as him. He wrote poems to him. And the greeks identified the Hebrew god as him. Later, during Vespasian's time, coins commemorating the defeat of their rebellion showed their god defeated with BACCHUS JUDAEUS written, as that was the Interpretatio Romana of it.
@ yes, I’m familiar with all that. And it’s totally anachronistic to the Christian experience after, what, 2AD 😄
@weltgeistyt SOMEONE IS LITERALLY COPYING YOUR CONTENT. If you give me an email I'm telling you more details. He is plagiarizing you.
There’s an email on the channel page, in the About section. Can’t post it here because youtube will block it
V
"The criminal of criminals is consequently the philosopher"
so he is acknowledging he is the criminal using weak dialectic to convince other weak individuals
cringe, all of these ideas ironically only are attractive to the weak and resentful
FTP
H
pecooliar
M❤❤❤❤😢😢
😂
Consider the decagram material above spirit and spirit above material ,
it is true that we are eternal spirits operating temporary bodies ,
but why would you not use the body while you have it the real way to be happy in this life is to find a balance between material and spirit you don't want to be some neurotic materialistic atheist type that laments everyday as one step closer to his end , and you don't want to be some priest hiding from Life chanting until you die .
What if chanting is life?
👍🏼👀✨
Its crazy how people will jump to follow Nitchze....who probrably hates you for being weak.....and be reluctantant to follow Jesus, who loves you regardless......its mind boggling....
Honestly, after all the thought in my life, I've concluded people dismiss God mostly because they believe the world to be disordered or wrong, thus elevating their own wisdom above God. They think they're smarter than God could ever be, how can you reason with that? It's impossible.
Nietzsche observes the law of nature.
there is no such thing in nature as unconditional love so only way for that to be the truth would be jesus but the evidence is weak
@@paton991 strongly disagree
@@xravenx24fe I agree
@@mayachico9766 tell me an example of unconditional love in nature
By the end he got locked himself lols.
Agreed
πεταμα ζωντανα στην πυρα ποιο κρεμασμα
Been following @DionysianMagi?
No…
@@WeltgeistYT Thanks for telling me.