18:37- Stephan (theist): we accept our lineage and the big bang based on faith, Dr. Robert Gentry and polonium halos, anthropological evidence for God, 12 foot human remains disproves evolution, asks if the hosts were present at the big bang, Mount Sinai proves creation, it is unfair that evolution has its way in classrooms 51:43- Dan (atheist): has a bone to pick with the atheist community regarding the foundations of logic, atheists don't ask why theists have flawed arguments, in order to judge intelligence it must be limited 1:00:40- Steven (poe/troll): ancient aliens, evidence of ancient nuclear explosions in the Indus Valley 1:08:44- Shilpa: kindness is better than truth, asks what should happen to religion, turning to religion for inspiration 1:27:17- Joe: the Texas State Board of Education is making a thinly veiled attempt to re-indoctrinate society (call is cut off)
Stephen is the biggest idiot ever he read it so it's true a professor said it so it's TRUE a scientist said it n it's TRUE lol what a ding bag ..Stephen is from Barbados where the most brainwash people are because they were the first slave society so anything that is said by the slave master is gospel..
you also have the possibility to gather the integrity to not even wannin lies and manipulation in the name of your boner make the biggest chunk of your contribution to mankind.
It's funny when theists bring up the whole "were you there" argument. I would ask the theist if they were there when Jesus turned water into wine or was crucified.
They seem oblivious when they use that argument, shooting themselves right in the foot. Were they there when Jesus crucified and supposedly rose from the dead? It’s a pathetic attempt to equate belief with disbelief. I hate to have to insult people, buts straight-stupid.
they tend to derive false confidence from websites/pundits [as a substitute for actually studying the disciplines you mention]. sort of a Dunning-Kruger piggyback or leapfrogging in some cases.
The YouTubber Potholer54 usually says this when someone brings up a conspiracy of scientists towards a particular conclusion: either there's a global conspiracy of science, or maybe the scientists know something that you don't.
The episodes with Jeff are my favorites! I think him and Matt make a fantastic team. I haven’t seen a better team thus far than TJump and Matt but Jeff and Matt is a close second.
If the god of the bible had been portrayed as a king instead of a God , he would be remembered as the most evil, mass murdering, tyrannical dictator of all time! Christians give the bible god a free pass because, they say, he is god the creator. I don't see the difference whether man or god. If his actions were evil or immoral, as the bible states, then he'd be just as guilty of being evil as any human committing the same deeds.
Science: gather evidence, then come to a conclusion. Start with “I don’t know,” then “Let’s find out.” Anti-science (religion): Start with the conclusion, then try to find evidence to support it. Start with “I know,” then “Let’s justify it.”
I remember my roommate and i debating about the claims of the photos. I think its been exposed that those photos were from a National Geographic photo contest. The photos are actually pretty cool but not real.
Dans arguments sound as incoherent as those of Andrew of the Austin Stone Church...could it be that Dan is Andrew using a voice distortion machine". Just wondering.
I love ancient alien theory, because not only does it represent this pseudo-religion that we're able to watch grow and turn into a thing..... With now in my opinion much more evidence and proof to support their hypothesis than most religions actually have. Because ancient alien theories unifies all religions, and basically tells us that every religious belief based on old texts are correct just misinterpreted, because of its so-called gods who were actually aliens. The fact that people can make these arguments and throw one or two world renowned physicist and other methods they use such as gaslighting and insult us into believing any sane person would come to this conclusion.......... And to religious people they first say your texts and beliefs are totally valid. It's been awesome to watch the evolution of this idea I'm completely addicted to anything that has to do with this hypothesis. It's like we have an inside show to the formation of Scientology, Mormonism, or other cults. Fascinating to me that in only a few years they have amassed far more evidence than any religion ever has, and they appeal to your logical side as well as your "spiritual" .Now I don't know how much of what I see on those shows is real, because before they convinced you of one thing they tell you how this is being researched and supported and thereby is proved. Anyway I wish I was as intelligent or informed as Matt so I could debate like this! It's awesome and important what you guys are doing.
@@ginasalinas2731 the only reason i ever look any further into the antics of "the intelligent design movement" is to see where their ideas overlap with "ancient alien-ists". I too find it fascinating as a sample of humans making ad hoc narratives, pareidolia(sp?), special-pleading-pattern-recognition and so on.
According to the Bible, God created the Earth and heavens on the first day. He didn’t create light until the second day, so He created everything IN THE DARK! That’s impressive. Also, He didn’t create the Sun and Moon until the fourth day, so where did all that light come from? And He created all of the plant life on the third day, before the sun, so how did vegetation begin without photosynthesis?
Dan has a silly notion that atheists need to care about and address the subject of where theists get their silly ideas. I don’t care where they get their nonsense.💩
18:37- Stephan (theist): we accept our lineage and the big bang based on faith, Dr. Robert Gentry and polonium halos, anthropological evidence for God, 12 foot human remains disproves evolution, asks if the hosts were present at the big bang, Mount Sinai proves creation, it is unfair that evolution has its way in classrooms
51:43- Dan (atheist): has a bone to pick with the atheist community regarding the foundations of logic, atheists don't ask why theists have flawed arguments, in order to judge intelligence it must be limited
1:00:40- Steven (poe/troll): ancient aliens, evidence of ancient nuclear explosions in the Indus Valley
1:08:44- Shilpa: kindness is better than truth, asks what should happen to religion, turning to religion for inspiration
1:27:17- Joe: the Texas State Board of Education is making a thinly veiled attempt to re-indoctrinate society (call is cut off)
Stephen is the biggest idiot ever he read it so it's true a professor said it so it's TRUE a scientist said it n it's TRUE lol what a ding bag ..Stephen is from Barbados where the most brainwash people are because they were the first slave society so anything that is said by the slave master is gospel..
“You have a right to your own beliefs, you do not have a right to your own facts.” Damn right Jeff.
you also have the possibility to gather the integrity to not even wannin lies and manipulation in the name of your boner make the biggest chunk of your contribution to mankind.
This Stephan call has so many good points. Matt and Jeff really shine together.
I think this is my favourite episode. Probably 3rd time I've listened to since aired. Great duo. Great mix of calls. Bring back Jeff as a guest.
It's funny when theists bring up the whole "were you there" argument. I would ask the theist if they were there when Jesus turned water into wine or was crucified.
They seem oblivious when they use that argument, shooting themselves right in the foot. Were they there when Jesus crucified and supposedly rose from the dead? It’s a pathetic attempt to equate belief with disbelief. I hate to have to insult people, buts straight-stupid.
Don't study Evolution or big bang cosmology at all and then call the show and argue about evolution and big bang cosmology.
they tend to derive false confidence from websites/pundits [as a substitute for actually studying the disciplines you mention]. sort of a Dunning-Kruger piggyback or leapfrogging in some cases.
The whole Polonium halos thing is a total crock. As is Stephan, who is one of the bigger nutcases on AE.
If there are no dogs or cats in heaven, why would anybody want to go there?
Thanks for a great episode. It is nice to be remembered how good the show used to be.
Stephan needs constant adult supervision. He will buy any bullshit story put in front of him.
The YouTubber Potholer54 usually says this when someone brings up a conspiracy of scientists towards a particular conclusion: either there's a global conspiracy of science, or maybe the scientists know something that you don't.
These videos deserve more comments
Here you go.
@@jonathanpark7245
😊
The episodes with Jeff are my favorites! I think him and Matt make a fantastic team. I haven’t seen a better team thus far than TJump and Matt but Jeff and Matt is a close second.
If the god of the bible had been portrayed as a king instead of a God , he would be remembered as the most evil, mass murdering, tyrannical dictator of all time! Christians give the bible god a free pass because, they say, he is god the creator. I don't see the difference whether man or god. If his actions were evil or immoral, as the bible states, then he'd be just as guilty of being evil as any human committing the same deeds.
Immensely agreed.
Shhh...!!! You're not supposed to talk about it...! Just act stupid
I’ve seen this comment in multiple comments sections, but it’s absolutely true nonetheless.
Science: gather evidence, then come to a conclusion. Start with “I don’t know,” then “Let’s find out.” Anti-science (religion): Start with the conclusion, then try to find evidence to support it. Start with “I know,” then “Let’s justify it.”
Stephan is unbelievable.
Oof, Stephan's polonium argument is gonna make me break out my Rick James impression.
"It's a super-reach, super-reach! It's super-reachy, yeah!"
oh stephan it all came apart with the ridiculous 'were you there' argument
Love Jeff's Serenity Tshirt. Great taste.
"Nuclear transfusion" Hahahaha!
Hey, dont knock it...... maybe injecting nuclear waste into your veins is good for you. I suggest we allow Stephan to be out first test subject.
The nuclear blast guy has one thing against him. We have wine that contains cesium 137 now and all the wine before the first nuclear test does not.
I worship the ancient Incan god of beverages - Popthecetalon.
Damn, Jeff can draw.
He does that professionally.
I remember my roommate and i debating about the claims of the photos. I think its been exposed that those photos were from a National Geographic photo contest. The photos are actually pretty cool but not real.
Dan no idea what point you were trying to make
Shilpa It's not the myth that matters, I believe it's when they bring that fantasy to the voting booth that matters.
The idea that religious beliefs can exist without influencing anything else is naive.
Dans arguments sound as incoherent as those of Andrew of the Austin Stone Church...could it be that Dan is Andrew using a voice distortion machine". Just wondering.
They have mud-brick huts in the immediate area of this so-called "ancient nuclear blast" and they weren't even knocked down! Some blast, huh?
I love ancient alien theory, because not only does it represent this pseudo-religion that we're able to watch grow and turn into a thing..... With now in my opinion much more evidence and proof to support their hypothesis than most religions actually have. Because ancient alien theories unifies all religions, and basically tells us that every religious belief based on old texts are correct just misinterpreted, because of its so-called gods who were actually aliens. The fact that people can make these arguments and throw one or two world renowned physicist and other methods they use such as gaslighting and insult us into believing any sane person would come to this conclusion.......... And to religious people they first say your texts and beliefs are totally valid. It's been awesome to watch the evolution of this idea I'm completely addicted to anything that has to do with this hypothesis. It's like we have an inside show to the formation of Scientology, Mormonism, or other cults. Fascinating to me that in only a few years they have amassed far more evidence than any religion ever has, and they appeal to your logical side as well as your "spiritual" .Now I don't know how much of what I see on those shows is real, because before they convinced you of one thing they tell you how this is being researched and supported and thereby is proved. Anyway I wish I was as intelligent or informed as Matt so I could debate like this!
It's awesome and important what you guys are doing.
@@ginasalinas2731 the only reason i ever look any further into the antics of "the intelligent design movement" is to see where their ideas overlap with "ancient alien-ists". I too find it fascinating as a sample of humans making ad hoc narratives, pareidolia(sp?), special-pleading-pattern-recognition and so on.
@@n.presley917 yes!
Yeah, but, giants dude!!! (mic drop) lol
It turns out that it's OKAY for non-adherents to draw pictures. It is not okay for believers to do so.
I apply this song to covid 😂
According to the Bible, God created the Earth and heavens on the first day. He didn’t create light until the second day, so He created everything IN THE DARK! That’s impressive. Also, He didn’t create the Sun and Moon until the fourth day, so where did all that light come from? And He created all of the plant life on the third day, before the sun, so how did vegetation begin without photosynthesis?
The good ol days of ACA
18:30 ish calls start.
Forget an ark , show me a slave ship ???
But what about the Nazca lines in Peru?
--Steven
Draw Mohammad day? How about Punch a Creationist day?
Straw hats 👒 are pretty offensive 🥸
1:19:35 LOL 😂😂😂😂
3 minutes is now immediately
Dan has a silly notion that atheists need to care about and address the subject of where theists get their silly ideas. I don’t care where they get their nonsense.💩
shilpa! lol
Elephants
Elephants