Why jam 10x pot when he will fold range to 3x pot. I think there is a sizing past which he is completely inelastic anyway, and it seems going 10x will just gift him money when he does have the extremely rare slowplay, which he can start doing if he sees you make this move often
You defend less than MDF because in this line vilain has a lot of bluffing candidates hands that still have an EV of checking > 0. if we defend MDF and make all these hands 0 ev, he would just check back all his bluffs with a check EV > 0. So for these hands bluffcatching at mdf would not impact vilan ev as he would simply check back but his value range is going to gain ev as we are calling more bluffcatchers.
this may be due to the polar strategy used on this flop as well as the range advantage on the river. As BB's range is wide bb is force to check many hands with close to 0% equity making even hands like Q high or J high having enough equity to prefer checking than bluffing
We don't have to defend MDF because population can't find the bluffs that GTO would make on this run-out in the X-X-B line. The 8 and 9 on turn and river, give villain a lot of medium hands that would check back river. He does not have a lot of air region and might even bluff hands with showdown value (or even Jx).
@@YolanCohenPoker : is it because many bluff catching hands will be indifferent EV wise, so it does not matter much if you're close to MDF or not if you fold the ~0 EV hands (at least from a exploitatively stand-point).
@@YolanCohenPoker : so basically you don't need to be indifferent because there's no way you will ever get exploited (by under-defending). Is this the right answer? 🙂
You have a good removal E when a club hits, so AK will bluff all the time and unblock most folds river. + you block A5c. The other Ax non hearts blocks fold and dont have the good RE on clubs run out propriety (so you already have other combos so other AK bluff less)
If you bluff T9 on the T9225 board, a lotta regs will pure fold JJ but mix in some bluff catches with Tx bcuz of blockers, and that would really be sick for your hand
@@YolanCohenPoker The price is indeed a major turn off. What do you think about the node locking feature when you compare it to the PIO/GTO+? I heard that it only accounts for future streets without changing the sstrategy of previous streets. What are your thoughts? I think being able to nodelock on the spot is a major plus for me, but if the results are poor, then it's not worth it. Your thoughts?
Johan, what advice would you give to a micro-stakes Zoom player who wants to move up to NL100? Should they play Zoom or regular tables? In your opinion, which is better for development and in terms of winrate?
Yolan* I think regular is better , but it matters less than you think in my opinion. I have a low certainty in my answer so probably better you ask other guys.
Cause he doesn't arrive with enough air region on the river given that he rivers a lot of potencial valuebets and even if he is bluffing all of his air he still underbluffs, therefore we overfold?
Meme si tu a caché la main que tu fold en exploit a 20:20 (surement pour que vilain ne s'adapte pas trop facilement avec la video) on peut la voir en bas a droit de la table au moment du fold
36:53 to make his bluffing hands more profitable than checkbacking them which wouldnt be the case if we defended mdf ( someone told me, couldnt find by myself but atleast i remember it😁)
@@YolanCohenPoker I meant your style of play is like Joker, almost no mistakes, make the other players make the mistakes and top of your choosen games. I think about it often when i play.
I don’t think he is qualified. His conceptual understanding at times is just wrong and lot of what he says seems to be memorization than understanding. Talking about 3 different sizing on flop is completely meaningless. A) you are spending so much time on flop strategy where everything is close between almost every hand type.B) you have exponentially increased the number of nodes to study for turns and river. C) biggest EV mistakes / exploits comes from river. 90% of you study should be be spent on turns and river. D) if you are talking about equilibrium strategy and making it complicated when and how will you think of exploits?
I mean he's battling 5k so can't be horrific depending on pricing. Agree that a lot of the processing is extremely convoluted and going for the mad genius approach but I guess w/ correct boundaries, thresholds and calibrations you can make multiple approach work, as always. Idk if GG has smart hand for potential coaches OP but depending on level/stake the best options imo are: Aner0 Demon doink Jayser, jasamgale, bitb, nacho cfp Meta game GW value town (felix) Guerilla Ah and villain from the vid (Go0se) although not super active reg nowadays But going back to previous point, although some of YC's content/thought process is quite conceptual and sometimes the eqm accuracy may be off, you can analyse a player like stefan (which is hard to do w/o a certain level of competence) and it look like a 10nl HH half the time, or go on doomswitch downswing and look like your some fish on a heater but you do have to break the mould to reach the top. I guess true mastery comes from learning everything then forgetting it and forging new pathways
A lot of points so let me give a quick answer for all comments It's okay if you find me legitimate or not/skeptical. Think the approach is great overall. I'm not doing any coaching online, so I guess whatever. It's strictly impossible to memorise without a clear understanding (coming from someone holding the #1 ranking in the world in the image category for 2 years in an official memory competition). Also, I'm unsure about what I'm not understanding GTO-wise? I don't add complexity 95% of the time. You have a confirmation bias, so you just pick your argument and turn it in a negative way. If you saw Linus playing like I do, you wouldn't say that. This is confirmed by your comments on my channel, which tend to be more negative/pointing out mistakes. That's okay, though. I'm not here to convince; I respect your opinion if it's expressed respectfully. It's not because I talk about mixing sizing in one specific spot that I do it all the time. Plus, it's useful to know the strat to understand deviations against a 1/3 range. Strongly disagree. You can't separate river analysis from flop analysis. Being better on flops makes you better on the river. Working on complex flop strats is compatible with studying river strats. My game is adapted (as best as I can) to the game I'm playing. Most of my content at 200NL is simplified strat; at higher stakes, it's more complex. My only goal is to maximize EV in the lineup I'm playing. I don't know most CFPs. However, I’ve heard good feedback on the Mechanics of Poker (MoP) CFP. Others might be great, but I have no clue.
Too large a part of the weak hands that arrive at the river probably goes into a betting line in earlier streets and therefore defending at mdf freq is not profitable? That's my take atleast :D
![SPECIAL VIDEO - NL200 Extended GamePlay [2 hours]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/2L7w-MNmkV4/mqdefault.jpg)
![SPECIAL VIDEO - NL200 Extended GamePlay [2 hours]](/img/tr.png)
So much better with subtitles! Love it!
Tx mate
We got another Yolan HS video before GTA 6🎉🎉
Wait for the next weeks
thank you for sharing insights. caption addition is appreciated
👌
Why jam 10x pot when he will fold range to 3x pot. I think there is a sizing past which he is completely inelastic anyway, and it seems going 10x will just gift him money when he does have the extremely rare slowplay, which he can start doing if he sees you make this move often
Strongly disagree. But agree with the logic.
I think i can go for 5/6x pot, but the range is definitely not inelastic between 3x and AI here
How do you fight against RTA?
I don't know if it makes any difference, but in the KQ hand you were in HJ vs UTG.
You defend less than MDF because in this line vilain has a lot of bluffing candidates hands that still have an EV of checking > 0. if we defend MDF and make all these hands 0 ev, he would just check back all his bluffs with a check EV > 0. So for these hands bluffcatching at mdf would not impact vilan ev as he would simply check back but his value range is going to gain ev as we are calling more bluffcatchers.
this may be due to the polar strategy used on this flop as well as the range advantage on the river. As BB's range is wide bb is force to check many hands with close to 0% equity making even hands like Q high or J high having enough equity to prefer checking than bluffing
☑️
0:55 do you play multisize flop cbet strategies ? do u think they are mandatory in highstakes? (in most flops, not all of them)
Yes
How much do you have to pay to get like 5 sizes preflop on GTOWizard?
If I'm not wrong I think it's the second offer. Extremely strongly advice GTOwiz as always
want to know the color of the labels
what software did you use to find the multiway sim at 26:05? Great video!
Dm me on discord, will share it to you
We don't have to defend MDF because population can't find the bluffs that GTO would make on this run-out in the X-X-B line. The 8 and 9 on turn and river, give villain a lot of medium hands that would check back river. He does not have a lot of air region and might even bluff hands with showdown value (or even Jx).
Nop ! It's not due to human considerations
@@YolanCohenPoker : is it because many bluff catching hands will be indifferent EV wise, so it does not matter much if you're close to MDF or not if you fold the ~0 EV hands (at least from a exploitatively stand-point).
@@kevinkruijtfilms not really, but you're on the road , it's about non indifference and bluffs
@@YolanCohenPoker : so basically you don't need to be indifferent because there's no way you will ever get exploited (by under-defending). Is this the right answer? 🙂
@@kevinkruijtfilms it's true, but why ? thats the question, why defending mdf is exploitable ?
Which preflop solver do you use? Would you ever do a tutorial vid on it?
Can pm me on insta or discord.
No cause I'm sponso wizard
15:15 when considering which AK to bluff turn, why we bluff more with the Ac? I thought without Ac we block AQs
You have a good removal E when a club hits, so AK will bluff all the time and unblock most folds river. + you block A5c.
The other Ax non hearts blocks fold and dont have the good RE on clubs run out propriety (so you already have other combos so other AK bluff less)
If you bluff T9 on the T9225 board, a lotta regs will pure fold JJ but mix in some bluff catches with Tx bcuz of blockers, and that would really be sick for your hand
Hi Yolan, do you find the GTOW Elite tier much more beneficial than Premium?
@@notasuperuser i know the price is way higher but actually yes, huge diff to be able to use AI solve if you use it well enough
@@YolanCohenPoker The price is indeed a major turn off. What do you think about the node locking feature when you compare it to the PIO/GTO+? I heard that it only accounts for future streets without changing the sstrategy of previous streets. What are your thoughts? I think being able to nodelock on the spot is a major plus for me, but if the results are poor, then it's not worth it. Your thoughts?
14:32 could you explain why it’s better to bet more often when you hold the K♣️ OTT?
you block more the potential card brining fush river, and your 2pairs out is cleaner
Johan, what advice would you give to a micro-stakes Zoom player who wants to move up to NL100? Should they play Zoom or regular tables? In your opinion, which is better for development and in terms of winrate?
Yolan*
I think regular is better , but it matters less than you think in my opinion.
I have a low certainty in my answer so probably better you ask other guys.
@@YolanCohenPoker Ok, thanks Yohan
nice one! ty for your help and time! like this format thats for sure :)
Tx mate
Très bon format!
Gg
Tx !
Do I need to remind you about the one time you got called when overbetting huge? You don’t fool me bro I’ve seen all your videos 😂
Obviously I get called sometimes.
But I never got called in the B x AI or x x AI sb vs bb flush in turn
When you cover hands make sure you cover bottom right option to show hands as well. We can see the hand you tried to cover
Ahahahaha yeah I saw. Thats ok anyway only folding this in specific configurations
Thanks for pointing this out. Time to exploit 😈 😂
What is the price of coaching pro live player? Thanks
@@Otter_9803 you mean if you're pro live player ?
@@YolanCohenPoker Full time cash poker player but I think my level is not “pro”
@@Otter_9803 dm me on insta
@@YolanCohenPoker dm ed
Cause he doesn't arrive with enough air region on the river given that he rivers a lot of potencial valuebets and even if he is bluffing all of his air he still underbluffs, therefore we overfold?
Nah
because part of our range loses to bluffs
Meme si tu a caché la main que tu fold en exploit a 20:20 (surement pour que vilain ne s'adapte pas trop facilement avec la video) on peut la voir en bas a droit de la table au moment du fold
what happened to the "boring 5knl session" title, tht was fire
done again
36:53 to make his bluffing hands more profitable than checkbacking them which wouldnt be the case if we defended mdf ( someone told me, couldnt find by myself but atleast i remember it😁)
No :p
@@YolanCohenPoker explain :P
@@MIZRg2G7HA waiting to see if someone is going to find the answer. I remember back in the days I thought hours about this and I didn't find by myself
@@YolanCohenPoker can it be something related to blockers?
@@MIZRg2G7HA not really
You are the Novak Joker of poker😊
Tennis competition is 100times higher I guess, but appreciate it :)
@@YolanCohenPoker I meant your style of play is like Joker, almost no mistakes, make the other players make the mistakes and top of your choosen games. I think about it often when i play.
hi yolan, do u do coaching ? i speak french, ur probably very expensive but i dont care im hard struck at nl 50
I don't sorry. Only coaching through the mentoring for Live Pro Players . In September.
@@YolanCohenPoker ok thanks for the answer, do you know a coach i can ask?
I don’t think he is qualified. His conceptual understanding at times is just wrong and lot of what he says seems to be memorization than understanding. Talking about 3 different sizing on flop is completely meaningless. A) you are spending so much time on flop strategy where everything is close between almost every hand type.B) you have exponentially increased the number of nodes to study for turns and river.
C) biggest EV mistakes / exploits comes from river. 90% of you study should be be spent on turns and river.
D) if you are talking about equilibrium strategy and making it complicated when and how will you think of exploits?
I mean he's battling 5k so can't be horrific depending on pricing. Agree that a lot of the processing is extremely convoluted and going for the mad genius approach but I guess w/ correct boundaries, thresholds and calibrations you can make multiple approach work, as always.
Idk if GG has smart hand for potential coaches OP but depending on level/stake the best options imo are:
Aner0
Demon doink
Jayser, jasamgale, bitb, nacho cfp
Meta game
GW value town (felix)
Guerilla
Ah and villain from the vid (Go0se) although not super active reg nowadays
But going back to previous point, although some of YC's content/thought process is quite conceptual and sometimes the eqm accuracy may be off, you can analyse a player like stefan (which is hard to do w/o a certain level of competence) and it look like a 10nl HH half the time, or go on doomswitch downswing and look like your some fish on a heater but you do have to break the mould to reach the top.
I guess true mastery comes from learning everything then forgetting it and forging new pathways
A lot of points so let me give a quick answer for all comments
It's okay if you find me legitimate or not/skeptical. Think the approach is great overall. I'm not doing any coaching online, so I guess whatever.
It's strictly impossible to memorise without a clear understanding (coming from someone holding the #1 ranking in the world in the image category for 2 years in an official memory competition). Also, I'm unsure about what I'm not understanding GTO-wise?
I don't add complexity 95% of the time. You have a confirmation bias, so you just pick your argument and turn it in a negative way. If you saw Linus playing like I do, you wouldn't say that. This is confirmed by your comments on my channel, which tend to be more negative/pointing out mistakes. That's okay, though. I'm not here to convince; I respect your opinion if it's expressed respectfully.
It's not because I talk about mixing sizing in one specific spot that I do it all the time. Plus, it's useful to know the strat to understand deviations against a 1/3 range.
Strongly disagree. You can't separate river analysis from flop analysis. Being better on flops makes you better on the river. Working on complex flop strats is compatible with studying river strats.
My game is adapted (as best as I can) to the game I'm playing. Most of my content at 200NL is simplified strat; at higher stakes, it's more complex. My only goal is to maximize EV in the lineup I'm playing.
I don't know most CFPs. However, I’ve heard good feedback on the Mechanics of Poker (MoP) CFP. Others might be great, but I have no clue.
😊Do you live in Austria?
@@emiliopokerYT I live in Estonia
Too large a part of the weak hands that arrive at the river probably goes into a betting line in earlier streets and therefore defending at mdf freq is not profitable? That's my take atleast :D
Na
is this your main study aproach right now?
like going on wizard ? I'm working with my own stuff but not showing it on yt cause im anit
@@YolanCohenPoker I mean live session + wizard
@@rasimomomain work online is player tendency. Dont think i have a massive ev to work only on thorry
@@YolanCohenPoker got it, thank you
dropping GEMS!!!
Xièxiè ní
how come this is free content
@@lamfelix6074 It's gonna be 8 years I'm in Poker. Time to give back what I've learned. But not everything of course :)
Tight fold la main du bombardier 😅
😛
we can clearly see your exploit fold 88 though, be smarter next time lol.
😇