EXPLAINED: Was England's penalty against Netherlands the right call? |EURO 2024
Вставка
- Опубліковано 25 сер 2024
- England was awarded a penalty when they were trailing 0-1 against the Netherlands in the semifinal of Euro 2024. while England fans were happy, the Dutch players and their coach was unhappy with the decision. Was the VAR right in suggesting a penalty? Watch the video for more.
I'm English and agree that it wasn't a penalty. The Netherlands were robbed of the chance to go to more time and potentially win. But the refs have been utterly atrocious in this entire competition this time.
@@spearedtodeath2017
I am a Man U fan for many years
Eric Cantona time
I was born in Mauritius most of my country people were England fans
They love the Premiership
People support United Liverpool Chelsea Arsenal and Newcastle
But we all agreed it was not a penalty
And also we are happy England is in the final
From the Netherlands; I ll think that the referee mainly kicked in the theater of Bale. Because a minute later hé got up again and took the penalty himself
Match fixing.
Nowhere near a penalty.
Even after all the slow motion replays.
Absolute con.
Kane rolling around like his foot was broken then he jumps up to take the penalty if that's what they have to do to win a match then it shows you how bad they are if you can't win a match by fair means then you should not be playing that's why everyone is for Spain the fans hate cheaters but if we get another crooked ref who knows what will happen I don't think there are any straight ref's left there all crooked😢
Come on ENGLAND
No it’s was not a penalty
Even Gary Neville said so
I tell you, VAR is to aid betting syndicates and to fix matches... period!!
NO! It was NOT! a penalty. Kane dropped like he’d been shot in the foot by a sniper 😂🤣😂 Great ACTING! shame he can’t play football. He’s played CRAP! all through the Tournament, an embarrassment. 😡
Grow up
SAKA hands the ball 5 seconds b4 the clash between Kane and Dumfriess so no penalty
Horrible, disgusting, shameless, decision. Perhaps some English $$$$ were promised to VAR. I guess the defender just had to stand still and allow Kane to take the shot.
It was a 50 50 ball, kane kicked his foot not other way around
Look carefully, it was Kane who kicked the Dutch player's boots and instantly took a dive !! The Dutch defender did nothing wrong!! The refree and those in the VAR room must be banned for life !! The cheats that they're..... Disgraceful !!
@@koko2bware what a shameful referee ,
No it wasn’t a penalty, the referee or the VAR should have stop the the play before that when Saka made hands. ( but I guess they were afraid some one of the England team would comment on the match fixing history of Mr Zwayer again so they decided to help England a bit)
He kicked the defenders boot , not the other way around.
Terrible decision.
I tell you, this VAR nonsense is to aid betting syndicates and fix matches... period!!
That should be a free kick for dmfreis . Kane followed through and hit him 😊
" There is a unwritten law " be serious. In any proffesional sporting game, they not ruled by unwritten laws, ha ha.
Who initiated the contact? If it's tge defender, then award a foul and thus penalty kick.
If it's the attacker, then play on or award the defender a free kick.
Ref decided to play on, good call, but only to be called back by var.
If var overrules a ref, they should look at the total picture, including what preceeds the 'supposed foul' (like they did with hand ball from Belgium, when disallowing a goal).
Could have seen a handball from Saka, just before the Kane kick.
In all: a very bad decision by the var!!
How about Saka's handball seconds before Kane made his shot? This penalty was a disgrace. You cannot try to win at any price. English fans must not become omnivorous.
Not a penalty . If they not had a penalty , they were home now .
@@markmateman2968 PENALTY ALL DAY LONG, ANYONE SHOWING THEIR STUDS SHOULD GET AT LEAST A BOOKING OR SENT OFF
@@petermizon4344 justice wil prevail at sunday , they in the final with help from the Var ! Vamos espana !
@@markmateman2968 WE WILL SEE KOEMAN GOT AWAY WITH MURDER WHEN HE BROKE GAZZAS NOSE NIT EVEN A BOOKING, AND THE DUTCH VSN BE DIRTY WE HAVE SEEN OVER THE YEARS AND SPITTING IN OTHER PLAYERS FACES, SO STOP MOANING AND MAY THE BEST AND LUCKIEST TEAM WIN AND HOPE ITS ENGLAND WE ARE DUE ONE AFTER ALL THE BAD THINGS DONE TO US
Another rich crooked referee and var assistant is their no organisation that can investigate referees and.var officials the game of football is ruined by these stupid calls it's just not worth watching anymore something will have to be done to sort all this shit out once and for all😮
What about saka, s Handball,????
Why the fuck Spain vrs Germany,no var on referee, fucking the system
Any where else on the pitch its a free kick, so why not a penalty. Unwritten laws are just that , unwritten so are not valid.
Unwritten laws are about natural justice.
No hint of penalty and contrived decision.
Scandalous.
Simple. Attempted tackle, missed ball, caught player. Foul outside the box, penalty inside.
Silly analysis.
Felt wrong instantly and yoo know that.
@@Ondolite Silly? Well, I am a qualified referee. Are you? It's a clear penalty. Sorry you don't understand the rules. Try reading them. It will help your understanding of them.
@@user-ut2qv5jw3i 55 years of watching football and level 2 coach here.
Your opinion is just that.
Yoo are not the only ref in the world and your view is no more valid than anyone else's.
Yellow for Kane due to simulation.
@@Ondolite you are a level 2? I am level 4, a coach educator to amateurs like yourself up to level 3, a referee and have 450 pro games under my belt. Stop being silly. You haven't a clue.
@@user-ut2qv5jw3i Yoo present yourself as some sort of voice of refereeing which is really arrogant.
I have just seen Alan Shearer and Gary Neville, two record breaking players and with bags of England caps, say that it was not a penalty but of course, compared to yoo what
do they know? (😁)
Everybody who thinks is penalty,must do some reality check..because they need help too now the truth😂😂😮😮😅😅
This is how Romania felt when the referee was totally on Netherlands side !
How many times does this happen you win some loose some
Worst penalty ever.
Tainted campaign now.
😂😂😂😂 there's an unwritten law??? So it isn't a law, then? The game is based on rules, and the use of VAR is there to highlight what is deemed to be a questionable or incorrect decision and gives the ref the opportunity to look at the incident again, so, the same referee who initially gave a goalkick changes his decision to a penalty, which was the correct one based on the rule;
'It is committed with an opponent nearby and prevents the opponent from playing the ball for fear of injury. Playing in a dangerous manner involves no physical contact between the players. If there is physical contact, the action becomes an offence punishable with a direct free kick or penalty kick.'
Soft penalty but it was given. Life goes on …
Never .
the spanish handball against germany was more apparent but not given
The penalty was unjust and contrary to fair play!
No kane just playing drama, because if he injured menit later he hit de ball with dats power😅😂 big comedian 😂
I like VAR more each time a watch the decision 😅
All we talk about is Decisions in games...the game itself has become irrelevant.
Lets not talk about how good England was in the first half...what a good goal was scored by both teams ...etc
Get lost.
VAR rubbish
Must have been an English fan😂😂😂
@@user-qf8yw5ty1x I am an England fan and also I am a united fan
I am glad England in the final but it was not a penalty 😀
Yes dirty play
VAR - back to the drawing board....
Nope!
Not only a penalty, but a red card offence. If the ball has left a player when he was roughly (and in this case dangerously) challenged by an opponent, it is a foul against the opponent. If the foul was within the 18 yard box, it is definitely a penalty. I wonder why some people would choose to always appeal to sentiments or lend a negative voice to issues. Thank God for the introduction of VAR; the referee would have awarded a goal kick at the risk of sidelining Harry Kane for the rest of the tournament and even beyond.
The stupidest comment you can say: unwritten law
But:
Why did no Dutch player protest when Saka played the ball with his hand a few seconds earlier?
THEY DID. watch it again 5 players raised their hand for the handball in the box
@@Goeloe Yes, I meant after the penalty whistle. But I forgot that only the captain can protest to the referee.
What a scam.
In lines of football when the ball left kane defender went in studs up which could have caused a injury
No it wasnt
If had happened anywhere else on the pitch it would ave been a free kick ,he lead with his studs so dangerous play so was a penalty right decision
Its a penalty for dangerous play inside the penalty area. Harry Kane can lost his carrier by serious injury when faults like this is created in front of goal. This is not a National debate but being humane or inhumane. The referee showed humanity by awarding a penalty. Bravo!!
oh please spare the dramatics
It wasn't a penalty. It wasn't a foul in or outside the box. Kane kicked the ball and then kicked Dumfries foot. That was clearly what happened. VAR can get it wrong. Its irrelevant wether its your own team or not. If that happened against England we would soon be complaining.
Just like Reuben😂
ENGLAND 🇬🇧 🏴 THE POSSIBILITIES ARE THERE FOR YOU.... THIS TEAM CAN DO IT.. 💯 BELIEVE IT.. 🇬🇧 ENGLAND 🏴
Spain Ek chapion 😅😅😅
ABD THE SO CALLED HAND BALL WAS NOT ON PURPOSE THE BALL HIT SAKA AND THE MORE HE MOVED HIS HAND THE SPIN ON THE BALL ROLLER UP HIS ARM, TO QUICK TO DO ANYTHING
The hands of god and the foot of god ..😂😂😂😂
OH, DEAR, WHAT A SHAME NEVER MIND . We would have won anyway, either by a direct win or penalty shootouts,
So you clog dancers stop whinging.
Look again
AND DONT FORGET KOEMAN BREAKING GAZZAS JAW AND WASNT SENT OFF, VENGEANCE CONES IN MANY DIFFERENT FORMS
Karma or the law of cause and effect is real. Koeman this time as a manager is the wrong side of a decision, whether it was a penalty or not.
It wasn't koeman you fool
Cleats were up. It's a penalty.
After the 18th minute penalty Holland had 42 minutes to win the game but they failed to score
And they would have won if the english hadent cheated Oscar winning performance from the one and only HARRY KANE😂😂😂😂
A reckless tackle, studs up that could break an ankle is a foul even after the ball has gone, where ever it is on the pitch
Dangerous play simple a penalty
ENGLAND IS OUT EU UNION!!!! IT SHOULDNT THEREFOR BE IN THE European Champions League!!! So Netherlands should go to the final against Spain!!!!!! NETHERLANDS AGAINST SPAIN🧡🇳🇱🧡🇳🇱🧡🇳🇱🧡🇳🇱🇳🇱🇳🇱🇳🇱🇳🇱🇪🇬🇪🇬🧡🧡🧡🧡🧡
Please learn the difference between the EU and Europe. There are many European countries that are not in the EU. The EUFA Euro cup has nothing to do with the EU.
If that's the case, why wasn't it called 'The Common Market' cup and then the 'EU' cup...... your logic is seriously lacking if you think that not choosing to be a member within a non elected trade agreement parliament has anything at all to do with any sporting competitions. The UK still exists within Europe, check your map. We haven't floated off elsewhere. 😅😅😅😅😅😅
The foot of god.?
Inn this contexrt
The defender went for Harry Kane' s leg instead of ball. However, he attempted to lock the player's leg in the goal area. The Netherlands did not go after the ball but the leg. That should also be a red card as well.
England was better team. Stop crying Dutch.
Definite penalty, unwritten law my ass!. If a player is yellow carded in the penalty area, it’s for a dangerous tackle.
PENALTY
That is not a controversial matter. It should had been a red card as well as the yellow card follow by the penalty.
Yes it was a penalty.. because he showed his studs causing injury.. and the ref didn't have all angles.. VAR.. did .. and if this happened to the Netherlands team and awarded a penalty. They would of been happy, as what England team was.. good decision, and hey still a good match on either side.. Good luck England in the final against Spain..
It is not penalty
Penalty with studs up
If the tackle was out side the box it would be a fowl, so if it's in the penalty area it's a penalty !!!
@@clifffinch1208 Simple studs up in a high tackle is a fowl
So much of an injury that Kane took the penalty with that same foot.
Would have been a free kick anywhere else on the pitch, move on. Karma for Koeman not being sent off in1993 ?
ITS ALL FIXED
Yes. Penalty, credit should go to the referee. Dangerously and mischievous attack in the goal area. Red card should also good.
Say what you want that a penalty
Thats not true, its was a clean penalty.
If Netherland win, of course England fans will say referees are in favour to Dutch.
May be Lineker is not having too much sale of his fruits and veg in the stalls nowadays, so he thinks it's not what it was awarded for!
When a foul happens inside the penalty area, what actually follows?!! What do you think if a defender shows his studs directly to the kicking feet of the player? Whether the clash took place before or, after kicking the ball, doesn't matter that was a 💯% foul inside the penalty area!
Losers complain but that was far too unrealistic for a captain to talk about football rules without sensing the reality of the football rule book based on "common sense"!
Studs showing, could have caused serious injury. Anywhere else a foul, even after the ball has gone.