Wow, they talked for about 20 minutes about the various books they were writing and then Slavoj's opening gambit was to talk about hardcore pornography. Say what you will, but he really knows how to get people's attention.
It is interesting but altough he touches those topics he never is tasteless even if he is vulgar, just like I imigaine Lenin to be like (without the swear words).
He has a way of sort-of rambling his way through things and spending time on small aspects of what he's talking about, that ends up really amplifying the vulgarity of things somehow.
F**K this guy. All those sitting around him also. Why? Because they never left europe.. they never left the euro-centric white mindset and they never visited far away nations, where poor people survive inspite of all the odds. Psychoanalysis for zombie turds. A closed society, rotting from within. Slobbering Zizek the flag bearer of.
Thanks for uploading. Would it not be a good idea to add Alenka's and Mlanden's name on the title? Yes it is true they are the "friends", but it could be important to make them more visible and open an alternative to the already cultivated personality of Zizek.
That was not my decision to make, unfortunately. The problem is that I would have to cut the title of the presentation due to word limit set by UA-cam. I hope everyone knows who they are, and it's also directly in the description.
What he said about how the metoo movement could lead to an atmosphere of victimhood where you might have to play a victim to be able to penetrate a cultural sphere, and be recognized and listened to, was so dangerous to say back then, at the height of the meetoo movement, but is coming true today.
I am starting to develop a psychoanalytical hypothesis, every philosopher/psychoanalyst who uses the word precisely profusely is highly likely to be a lacanian. Badiou, zizek, Alenka Zupancic :)
"The point of this lecture isn't to learn something new but to see a new side of a subject to give a new perspective." In other words, to learn something new.
It's possible to have a proposition you already knew be affirmed or reaffirmed in a different manner as to shed new light on it, whilst remaining the same proposition nonetheless.
While Žižek is talking about "hardcore pornography", the woman next to him looks like she's doing the default idle animation of an NPC from most games.
As a Chair, if you start dissecting their work in front of them, then you leave them perturbed do you not? But it's even more unsympathetic of the listener!
Somehow one can feel, how shall I put it, strangely honored when ever Zizek uses the word "stupid". Be that to some audience, students or Guatemalian child . . Perverts will understand what I'm trying to say and so on and so on.
It is absolutely uncanny how identical in thought and expression(?) these 3 are. The same vague, undefined and ultimately failed analysis. They all, particularly Zizek, register about a zero on the epistemological veracity meter. Though, I have to admit to having a perverse envy of their ability to rally for so long with a stream of consciousness that has zero content or valid extrapolation toward something that even resembles a theory. What a sad waste of time and intellectual effort. In other words - what is remarkable, is how wide is the gap between the APPEARANCE of meaningful discourse - and actual meaningful discourse...I hear nothing but a continuous stream of qualifications and equivocations. Nothing in the manner of a formal philosophical structure or development here...But I should be more respectful - let's just call this "a virtuoso theatrical performance". Bravo!
You seem a little lost buddy, your observation suffers of everything you are trying to pin on Alenka, Zizek and Mladen. You have completely failed in stating anything of value.
You're like a person who doesn't speak German claiming that the German language is just a series of arbitrary sounds. Stick to reading whatever books you find in the 'Smart Thinking' section of your local bookstore.
I just love that zizek dressed up for the occasion, and sat there quietly for so long during the intro. He truly respects his friends here
yeah... that was really wonderful to see.
Wow, they talked for about 20 minutes about the various books they were writing and then Slavoj's opening gambit was to talk about hardcore pornography. Say what you will, but he really knows how to get people's attention.
It is interesting but altough he touches those topics he never is tasteless even if he is vulgar, just like I imigaine Lenin to be like (without the swear words).
He has a way of sort-of rambling his way through things and spending time on small aspects of what he's talking about, that ends up really amplifying the vulgarity of things somehow.
F**K this guy. All those sitting around him also. Why? Because they never left europe.. they never left the euro-centric white mindset and they never visited
far away nations, where poor people survive inspite of all the odds. Psychoanalysis for zombie turds. A closed society, rotting from within. Slobbering Zizek the flag bearer of.
The three of them together work very well. An easy flow, no clashing of egos.
This is like the most complex form of emotional intelligence.
2:20 RIP Headphone users.
Thank you for this :)
It's just an experience of the traumatic Real
I get a surplus enjoyment from anguishing over wheter those tiny bottles of water would hold enough water to quench my thrist! ahahaha
00:00 - getting impatient :D
Thanks for uploading. Would it not be a good idea to add Alenka's and Mlanden's name on the title? Yes it is true they are the "friends", but it could be important to make them more visible and open an alternative to the already cultivated personality of Zizek.
That was not my decision to make, unfortunately. The problem is that I would have to cut the title of the presentation due to word limit set by UA-cam. I hope everyone knows who they are, and it's also directly in the description.
Ippolit Belinski Got it :)
What he said about how the metoo movement could lead to an atmosphere of victimhood where you might have to play a victim to be able to penetrate a cultural sphere, and be recognized and listened to, was so dangerous to say back then, at the height of the meetoo movement, but is coming true today.
I am starting to develop a psychoanalytical hypothesis, every philosopher/psychoanalyst who uses the word precisely profusely is highly likely to be a lacanian. Badiou, zizek, Alenka Zupancic :)
Omg is your profile pic female hegel
Also the phrase "as such"
The best "precisely" still coming from Zizek 🏆. Alenka uses it inflationary, I claim.
Sorry I don't chave time now to go into this . .
Just wanted to point to the similarities in voice and phonetics of Mladen Dolar and Gabor Maté.
"The point of this lecture isn't to learn something new but to see a new side of a subject to give a new perspective."
In other words, to learn something new.
It's possible to have a proposition you already knew be affirmed or reaffirmed in a different manner as to shed new light on it, whilst remaining the same proposition nonetheless.
@@heraclitus4884
Very true.
What IS sex? - my expectations is the philosophy and the words, sentences and phrases that was written and still reminds inside the book.
43 to 44min Note to self (Debord-Lacan): If institutionally haunted by Kant then haunted by their APA victims.
This is so amusing you know the other two aren’t going to be able to speak 😅
I cant say that i like a product so much,but i like to go shopping
Nice shoes zizek!
Ahahaahha!!! The hell joke!!!! Love that one.. "in there we can make love with all the victoria secret models everyday,and make couple exchanges".
0:54 Wait, like, ~*music theorist*~ music theorist? As in, chord progressions, modes, intervals, etc? I hope so lol, that’s deeply cool
Really true😂😢
While Žižek is talking about "hardcore pornography", the woman next to him looks like she's doing the default idle animation of an NPC from most games.
You mean Miss Zupancic?
Don't talk shit about Alenka!
As a Chair, if you start dissecting their work in front of them, then you leave them perturbed do you not? But it's even more unsympathetic of the listener!
K B
I agree that was rather pretentious. Tells me something about their self esteem
slavoj lookin like he lost some weight
@Knight of Faith with Sunglasses lol
Nah.
"Zizek and friends" lmao at least give them a name!
2:19
Somehow one can feel, how shall I put it, strangely honored when ever Zizek uses the word "stupid". Be that to some audience, students or Guatemalian child . .
Perverts will understand what I'm trying to say and so on and so on.
How about talking about psychoanalysis with an actual psychoanalyst?
i hardly understand anything that lady says.
listen again and again, she's is very clear!
Yes, listen to her closely. You will find that once you've understood certain concepts everything she says is totally clear yet very insightful
Wonder what the logos of God in gospel of john. The Greek's logos was impersonal and not a saviour of mankind.
The bald moderator guy talked way too long, what a bore.
It is absolutely uncanny how identical in thought and expression(?) these 3 are. The same vague, undefined and ultimately failed analysis. They all, particularly Zizek, register about a zero on the epistemological veracity meter. Though, I have to admit to having a perverse envy of their ability to rally for so long with a stream of consciousness that has zero content or valid extrapolation toward something that even resembles a theory. What a sad waste of time and intellectual effort. In other words - what is remarkable, is how wide is the gap between the APPEARANCE of meaningful discourse - and actual meaningful discourse...I hear nothing but a continuous stream of qualifications and equivocations. Nothing in the manner of a formal philosophical structure or development here...But I should be more respectful - let's just call this "a virtuoso theatrical performance". Bravo!
how do i order one of these "epistemological veracity meters" you speak of? Are the expensive?
@@Tom_Tom_Klondike hahahahahahahahaha
You seem a little lost buddy, your observation suffers of everything you are trying to pin on Alenka, Zizek and Mladen. You have completely failed in stating anything of value.
You're like a person who doesn't speak German claiming that the German language is just a series of arbitrary sounds. Stick to reading whatever books you find in the 'Smart Thinking' section of your local bookstore.
Stop riding your own phallus this much mate.