Guard Traces & Crosstalk | A Follow-up

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 28 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 7

  • @BenjiShock
    @BenjiShock 2 місяці тому

    Thank you for not letting this sit on the internet and actually showing all the different cases! You and Bogatin were right all along, people just confused these cases. And to be honest if I would have been sceptical to say the least as well, so good on them for asking, because I think this isn't intuitive at all! (Maybe if you can solve numerical equations in your head its intuitive)

  • @leeslevin7602
    @leeslevin7602 Рік тому +1

    Brilliant, thank you.

  • @r.safakarici4686
    @r.safakarici4686 Рік тому

    thanks a lot...

  • @petersage5157
    @petersage5157 Рік тому

    This is where I wonder if Zach and I are speaking the same language. In analog, what we call a guard trace is typically used to protect a *single* signal trace from interference and is driven to the same voltage as a high impedance input, e.g. the "virtual ground" reference of an op amp.

    • @zyeborm
      @zyeborm Рік тому

      I think the different languages are essentially analog and digital. Or high and low impedance.

    • @Zachariah-Peterson
      @Zachariah-Peterson Рік тому

      In digital guard trace is meant to literally refer to a trace, but what matters is how it is connected at each end (usually ground at one or both ends). In the audio case it sounds like it's driven at one end and terminated at a high impedance at the other end, do I have that right?

    • @petersage5157
      @petersage5157 Рік тому

      @@Zachariah-Peterson Close. The guard is driven to a low impedance reference voltage, usually the op amp's virtual ground. The potential victim trace goes to the op amp's high impedance input. The guard is often a ring around the input. Depending on the implementation, there may also be an RF bypass capacitor to shunt aggressor noise to chassis or system ground, like the one I called out on a connector in another recent video of yours.