John McCarthy, on Philosophy of AI (Mini Symposium Philosophy of Information)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 7 вер 2024
  • John McCarthy on Philosophy of Information. Video from the public lectures of the Philosophy of Information Workshop in Amsterdam 2005.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 14

  • @subbuktek
    @subbuktek 9 років тому +29

    RIP John. Thanks for all the parentheses.

  • @pritomdasradheshyam2154
    @pritomdasradheshyam2154 4 роки тому +1

    Honored to hear this great Professor's lectures.

  • @scdecade
    @scdecade 9 років тому +7

    What a great man! A true thought leader and pioneer.

  • @ylluminarious151
    @ylluminarious151 7 років тому +4

    Clearly an intelligent guy. He made very valuable contributions to society and it's a shame we don't have people like him still spearheading the field of computing. Also a shame that he doesn't get the recognition that he deserves like so many other pioneers and real leaders in the field of science.
    It's neat to hear his thoughts on where we're at and where we're going. A shame that he had to shorten his section about "logical AI" (ua-cam.com/video/K13_sWm_gZw/v-deo.html), that sounds very interesting to hear.

  • @aoeu256
    @aoeu256 5 років тому +2

    If you want to use Clojure in your Java job, just call it XML. (Also keep a transpiler XML/Java transpiler handy just in case anyone asks any questions).

  • @loganpowell
    @loganpowell 4 роки тому

    Thank you for posting this

  • @fritzintn
    @fritzintn 11 років тому +3

    Interesting that John hated XML (@t=49m) as much as modern programmers. Although I was somewhat disenchanted to hear him self-deprecate on his aptitude for downloading and such. Perhap a LISP wizard is humble above all else.

    • @AbaseenPodcast
      @AbaseenPodcast 2 роки тому

      Have you heard Linus Torvald berate the Linux desktop distros?

  • @classScribbler
    @classScribbler 4 роки тому

    Can someone explain what he meant when he referred to Herbert Simmons ? 31:10 Is he implying that regardless of how much information flooding happens, people figure out what is relevant?

    • @James-mk8jp
      @James-mk8jp 2 роки тому +1

      I think he’s implying that A) it’s not an actual problem (if there was a publication that would’ve greatly affected his work 10 years prior, then that would mean there’s a filtering problem) and B) the filtering systems available have been and likely will continue to be sufficient (your point)

  • @ka0r1mxecx04
    @ka0r1mxecx04 3 роки тому

    i didn't like the way that he was talking here and i was expecting more important things than the crumplings he said