Whether "Recovery Evidence" by itself is Substantive Evidence: Justice V Ramkumar

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 8 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 11

  • @vishnujaware1139
    @vishnujaware1139 Рік тому +1

    Thanks My lord Ramkumar for enlighten the real concept under 27 of EV Act

  • @khirodpoudyal6537
    @khirodpoudyal6537 4 місяці тому +1

    Greatly beneficial content sir. Gratitude sir.

  • @gatul6305
    @gatul6305 Рік тому +1

    One of the best channels for Indian students.. We can only be so grateful to u... U re service to the fraternity is amazing.. I wish u the very best

  • @premnathp156
    @premnathp156 Рік тому +1

    God father justice ramkumar

  • @rajeshbhagat111
    @rajeshbhagat111 Рік тому +1

    Thanks a lot Sir... 🙏

  • @salmanlaw309
    @salmanlaw309 Рік тому +1

    Nobody can match the way in which Ramkumar Sir can explain a complex topic in such a easy way,his videos are to be treasured 😊

  • @abdulhakeem5038
    @abdulhakeem5038 Рік тому +1

    Very nice lectures for enhancing knowledge and upliftment for new comers

  • @faizaanqureshi7724
    @faizaanqureshi7724 Рік тому +1

    Best law UA-cam channel

  • @aviationuser
    @aviationuser Рік тому +1

    Such a lucid and excellent explanation. Thanks to you Sir.

  • @chrisreay77
    @chrisreay77 5 місяців тому

    Respected sir very informative
    As pertaining to my case pw1
    Fabricated statment not relating to the case and section pw2 and pw3 falling under related witness also fabricated evidence without proof and not present at the scean of occurrence and mentioned wrong date and time and not at all present at the said spot and as police evidence not excepted thr pw3 accusing police vandalising the premises
    And suggetion are welcome
    Thank you sir

  • @gatul6305
    @gatul6305 Рік тому +1

    Can't thank u enuf