What Did Jeffrey Epstein Want With Stephen Hawking? - Eric Weinstein
Вставка
- Опубліковано 12 лют 2024
- Chris and Eric Weinstein discuss the most recent Jeffery Epstein files. What did Jeffrey Epstein want from Stephen Hawking according to Eric Weinstein? Why did Eric Weinstein think Jeffrey Epstein was interested in physics? What is the power of understanding physics according to Eric Weinstein?
Sign up for a one-dollar-per-month trial period from Shopify at www.shopify.com/modernwisdom (automatically applied at checkout)
Get access to every episode 10 hours before UA-cam by subscribing for free on Spotify - spoti.fi/2LSimPn or Apple Podcasts - apple.co/2MNqIgw
Get my free Reading List of 100 life-changing books here - chriswillx.com/books/
Try my productivity energy drink Neutonic here - neutonic.com/modernwisdom
-
Get in touch in the comments below or head to...
Instagram: / chriswillx
Twitter: / chriswillx
Email: chriswillx.com/contact/
Hello you savages. Watch the full episode with Eric here: ua-cam.com/video/p_swB_KS8Hw/v-deo.html! Sign up for a one-dollar-per-month trial period from Shopify at www.shopify.com/modernwisdom
Delayed gratification might be good for us but bloody hell mate you make it difficult with some of these clips.
Thank you! When Eric speaks I listen
please interview Bret Weinstein next :)
Would have been better if you had just released it, we watch everything you make but drip feeding clips to hype seems pointless and annoying, after I’ve listed to all the clips because it all I can get them I listen to the whole episode and have skip 9 minutes I’ve already heard, I get it l, it’s better for your view count because it artificially adds multiple views to the same content but it’s annoying and feels shitty from a follower point of view
Don’t release the episode. This 8 minutes and 56 seconds sample was a hard watch as it is.
What’s so odd to me is the sheer quantity of people complaining about his “dramatic, performative pauses”. Where I come from, saying nothing when you’re formulating a thought is way better than filling in the silence with words like “umm”, “ahh”, “sooo”, “you know”, and my all time favorite, “like”. From a public speaking standpoint he is tremendous. Not sure if people just aren’t familiar with good public speakers in this society of real housewives and child politicians or what.
Exactly this! I totally agree
I’ve done public speaking and studied it prior, and yes; pausing to allow for reflection, pondering, or digestion of ideas, or questions etc and making eye contact with your audience is important in maintaining their engagement and anticipation.
Ah, the results of a neverending flashy stream of 300 MPH have-it-right-now 30 second average "shorts" or clips on these platforms, scrolling one straight in to the next. Constant noise, movement and stimulation becomes a pacifier. People have been so systematically conditioned, or socially engineered to have such short attention spans so much now that it makes them feel uncomfortable to slow it down, stop and reflect within a discussion like these fine gentlemen do.
I notice the difference in the medical field. Getting someone’s vital signs now (I still take blood pressure manually), vs 20 years ago is vastly different. People’s eye movements are frequent, they can’t just sit and look at the wall or the floor, they don’t know where to look, they don’t know what to do with their hands without their phone, they don’t know what to do in general when there’s a few seconds of no talking, or if there’s a few seconds of silence in general. They either have to be moving, talking or they have to get out their phone. It’s moderately infuriating.
Agreed. It’s understating things to say he’s thoughtful but he’s just thoughtful
It’s bizarre how certain critiques are infectious. Talking about him in this way is like a trend of some sort
Granted I will say he’s not great at packaging and delivering a point which is to say he’s not great at simplifying what he’s talking about. But he’s sooooo much better than he used to be …I assume he’s aware of this.
The question is: What did Hawking want with Epstein.
Girls or money.
We often forget that Epstein was a rich lister, with an island, very charming and fun to hang out with.
Pretty much everyone wanted to hangout with Jeffrey Epstein, so why not the most famous physicist on the planet?
It was only after some allegations came out against him in the early 2000s that he was involved in sex trafficking that his popularity took a hit but many still stuck by him cos, remember, many just thought they were allegations brought against him by his "enemies" who were jealous of him and his money.
Of course, as more evidence came out, it became a different story.
So really, there is no question why Hawking wouldn't want to hang out with Epstein.
Everyone famous enough and rich enough did at one point.
Or both
Both were spies
Probably just Steven Hawking's autograph and maybe conversations with a very famous physicist. How hard is it to believe Steven Hawking's has millions of fans. That's just a fact.
It was nice of Eric to interview Chris 😂
Anyone else thought their internet connection was buffering?
Twice. 😆
more than twice
This
lol OH the drama. Just needed a little music.
It would have been edited, but CW is just trying to eats viewer minutes with this crap.
Eric, our interest in J E and why people are still talking about him is precisely because we know he could not have accomplished what he had in a vacuum. We know there are people "above" him that "permitted" his lifestyle. That is why we are curious to the nature of anybody that had association with him, financial or otherwise. And we KNOW the kind and calibre of some of the people he has "entertained". And we are suspicious. And I think that is the appropriate vibe.
…& E’s not the only one. At best he was a C- student in his construct.
“We”…
Most people are ignorant
And yet the vast majority are not ready to know the truth, or even not want to know the truth. The ignorant masses are only focussed on J.E. island and his "events" and are completely enthralled by it. A great diversion if ever there was one. I for one want to know the powerful people behind J.E., what their 'intentions' are and 'why'.
Is it still the same (((people))) Jesus called out years ago or is it another family or tribe I wonder. 🤔
Either way, those behind the curtain are still there because all the fools are focussed on J.E. immoral acts.
I think his point is that enough people aren't asking about the people behind Epstein, the people that created the construct called Jeffrey Epstein .
If Chris genuinely wants answers he should interview Whitney Web b. But he'd better be prepared for what he learns.
He did a total Jesse Ventura: “Why don’t you tell me?!” Seriously LOL!
This reminds me of the Episode in Parks & Rec where Ron Swanson is interrogated by city officials regarding something that happened with Leslie Knopp, and to be a hostile witness, he answers every question with a question.
that was a crazy episode
😂😂😂😂😂
It’s a power play
Funny cause EVERY interview of this guy is like that, EVERY 1...
All the haters in the comments. Eric had the distinction of being the first person to have figured out Epstein, years before the docs dropped. Guy deserves respect.
Pretty sure he figured it out because I told him.
He always knew because they are both Mossad
@@pinnitt if so he did a pretty bad job shutting up. Not every Jew is a Zionist and not every Zionist is an operative.
CERN and the quantum physics collider has changed everything
Although i agree Eric could write a masterclass at redirecting lightning, he does answer the question: why was epstien interested in physicists? Physics is power more then money or infinity stones. With all due respect I'm having a diffucult time seeing where people are confused here. He fumfers but answers the question and asks the deeper question: Who was behind JE and why do they* want to manipulate the field?
Thanks for having Eric on Chris, love your guys chemistry.
I can only think that all the criticisms in this comments section are because they don't want to admit how much went over their heads. What a challenging interviewee, and yes, great chemistry between them. GREAT moment when Eric just said "hm" with a slight nod, and then penetrating stare for 6 whole seconds. Too many people thing if they're not being spoonfed, there's nothing nutritious to be had.
"fumfer"--never heard that before but love it. I will use it from time to time while tipping my proverbial cap to you.
no man, heres how that should have gone. '' bit surprised hawking was on his list'' eric, '' well he seemed to gather any notable person (including eric himself.) in any field, for future connections or possible compromising'' there how long did that take you to read, do you have time to watch eric doing social verbal wheelies over and over. talk is cheap sucka's
Totally with you here... I see Eric's point clearly... and can see exactly why he posits the questions to the questions... its his way of saying "Do you want to go down a useless tangent that will produce no results or insight.... or do you want to stop studying string theory (or the conversational equivalent of it) and think of this MORE relevant question that gets you to your answer much more efficiently and directly. I honestly believe that Eric W. is a great litmus test for those who can think critically and those who are trying very hard but it is mostly going over their capability to understand the larger concept and frame of reference. I see this quite often. What happens to me when I watch an Eric W back and forth is I am half the time baffled at the questions given him as if the interviewer shouldn't be so daft at getting to the meat of the problem... OR Eric asks an even better question that makes me realized I have also been looking at the wrong portion of the problem. It sharpens one's ability to get past the noise to the most applicable part of the issue at hand.
Makes sense.
So excited for round 2. The last time Eric was on was absolutely mesmerizing - can’t wait
I think this is his third appearance.
Jesus really?
Nowadays people are so numb and intoxicated with massive loads of content everywhere, that they forget to use their brains. A lot of people commented that Eric was a master in the art of saying nothing and expected some answers. He already did people! In his podcast! He spoke his mind to whoever wanted to hear it. He received death threats due to that. He knows the answers to the questions he is given here. But he can't say them, for whatever reason. He may even want to protect his family and close ones. He wants us to make thought exercises and to talk as much as possible between ourselves and, then maybe, one day, someone will reach the right answer.
This clip demonstrates the same issue some people have had with Eric for years now: he is more performative than informational in a lot of cases. I suppose it's exciting to speculate about a conspiracy about who "created" Epstein and its connection to physics, but that ultimately gets us nowhere other than more speculation. I don't know about anyone else, but eventually, these super-exciting conspiratorial speculations don't amount to much. They just become performative theater for those hungry for the next hottest thing.
I agree, however Eric had personal dealings with him and thought very early on that Epstein's persona and whole set up didn't gel with everyone else who was that wealthy Eric had come into contact with. Something more than just him being a paedo and coming into money after linking up with the Daughter of a man who stole hundreds of millions from a pension fund...
I don't know about physics or science, but I thought he did a lot of circular talk. Did not convince me one ioda to be interested in physics, if that was his goal
@@janem3575 In what way is it circular? Is there not a clear progression from point 1) Epstein's list and Chris's thoughts on it 2) S. Hawking 3) The power of Physics 4) The obvious notion that there are people behind Epstein 5) The lack of innovation in aspects of theoretical physics 6) The seeming failure of String Theorists. Eric is being provocative and theatrical for effect and the dialogue is engaging because Chris gets to participate, and express himself as a layman (thinking the way many of us might), and Eric seriously engages and seeks to heighten the dialogue from his perspective of mathematical physics.
Ultimately, it is speculative but there is concrete discussion going on as well. Or is everyone in this thread aware of Witten's recent appearance at the World Science Festival and that it's the 40th anniversary re: 'Anomalies and the Green-Schwarz Mechanism'? And that he has been hearing from others in his field about their concerns. There is a non-circular narrative construction occurring here but apparently it bores everyone, or at least Eric's approach to it. Eric is smart, perhaps a bit too playful though.
Eric understands esoteric cronyism and control.
The interview Eric did trying to compromise O’Keefe before PV takedown is very interesting. Who are Eric’s friends that he wanted JOK to play nice with?
He is opening the conversation, he has enough humility to say he doesn't have all the answers. Are you suggesting that people should only discuss things with certainty? If one doesn't have definitive knowledge about a subject they just shouldn't talk about it?
Epstein teleported out of that jail.
@@Ladle69he used the pedos to destroy the pedos
bahaha that's it! He saw the future and with the help of hawkins and others he wormholed his way out!! That probably explains why the cameras were on the fritz!!
I never thought he was dead anyways.
I disagree with some of the sentiment here. Life isn’t always ask a question, get an immediate answer. He said he didn’t know.
What he did do was ask a provocative question and make me think a bit deeper about that situation and I’ll use that in the future to try and see what the real answer might be. He added more than enough to the conversation. We just get lazy and want immediate answers to our questions. Life doesn’t always work out like this. We have seemed to lose the ability to think critically.
It made me think also. Think that; anyone who is taking the time to lead me down the garden path that Jeffery Epstein was just a pawn using his career of leveraging powerful people by exploiting their weaknesses of lust, to obtain secrets of physics for some unnamed world power, perhaps has reason to distract me from the fact Epstein used young girls and trapped many middle aged men who made his acquaintance…
The common denominator between entertainers, politicians, and academics is that they all socialize with each other. Chris Tucker can introduce you to Jay-Z who can in turn introduce you to Obama. Why does Hawking have to be interesting beyond who he knows?
Indeed. An awesome guest.
bingo. Just another name dropping piece. Enroute to compromising the kings and queens one must play many pawns.
Why do ppl bounce questions back at the ppl asking the question, keep the questions on the guy who needs to answer
Then this would be the exact same episode as last time Weinstein was featured
The Socratic method is just a tool, it can be used in good or bad faith.
Good faith examples:
Guiding to a better suited question for the context
Pointing out assumptions or bias in the question
Clarification so a more clear answer can be given
Bad faith examples:
Derail from original question entirely
Make questioner look bad/stupid/uninformed/whatever
Misdirect to a more preferred topic/avoid answering
I haven't watched the whole thing yet. Eric tends to be good faith from what I've seen in the past though.
Relax, this is a podcast not an interview
Sitting across from a person and answering questions does nothing. Guiding people through your thought process, how to process information like you do, while still discussing the topic does significantly more for the other person in the conversation and in this case, the audience as well. It's equally important to understand HOW someone comes to a conclusion, as the conclusion itself.
Eric could just answer the question, but asking a lay person may give perspective of the audience, then they can discuss the relationship
This has to be one of the biggest dodges i’ve seen recently and on a subject like this. Just wtf was Eric thinking? I genuinely don’t think I can take him seriously anymore this is ridiculous.
It doesn't occur to you that calling out those hiding in "high places," who are pulling the strings could be dangerous?
He's thi, "How should I word this?"
One chooses answers strategically, especially when it's important. That seems obvious.
@@aeronmb He never answered the question and that’s the point.
You know you have a great guest when the trolls come out in force to denounce them.
Eric is amazing. I'm not a math or physics person but he explains it where I can keep up on a very high level view. Absolutely amazing speaker and thinker. Monday can't come fast enough!
What trolls?
He's a liar. I've listens to hours of him and his epstien story charges every time he tells it
This guy is so good at letting the other think through everything. Like a great parenting lol
Eric approaching Neil deGrasse Tyson levels of being in love with the smell of his own farts.
I'm not sure that's possible. No one loves one's own farts more than Tyson...
I was about to say something to that effect 😂
You described his character arc perfectly btw 👌
Ironically, I read this as I farted and loved the smell of that fart 🤣
😂
We all do fart.
But some just fart nicer!
I don't think JE was interested in Hawking. I think whoever was behind JE was interested in him and wanted JE to get close to learn something that Hawking wouldn't talk about to the public
It’s crazy how a simple question turned into something completely different
After living through Covid, I think everyone needs to be very aware of the political clout saying "Trust the Science" has. Having an instantly recognizable scientist in your pocket is an obvious political advantage.
The simplest explanation is Epstein, when not conning people or raping girls, loved watching Nova and a part of him believed he could’ve been a scientist, but his life is too busy with other things.
If he was inviting jazz musicians to the island, it would also be reasonable to guess he loved jazz and believed if he took saxophone lessons he’d be one of the greats. Not every explanation about Epstein needs to fit a Bond villain character arc.
Bingo, I knew the guy and he was extremely boring. There is no conspiracy other than he managed to acquire an island where famous people didn't have to worry about the papparazi when they partied. There was no cabal or big secret, his parties had thousands of attendess..but people want a 'list' lol.
The reason why people are suspicious is because Epstein paid people to cover-up allegations of Hawking having sex with minors, which means that he was somehow afraid of that allegation leading back to him. That doesn't mean Hawking is guilty, but it also makes him rather suspicious.
Ur saying epstein didn't abuse underage girls ?@stoneneils
So tell more. Was he a friend to the girls?@@stoneneils
@RandomYTCommenter ready it wrong I imagine mb
The better question is what did Stephen Hawking want from Jeffrey Epstein.
Its not a better question, we know what they wanted from Epstein, degeneracy and secual encounters that he could provide. Epsteins reasons and handlers aren't being discussed enough because they also own the media
Wow Eric is a handful to listen to. A master at saying nothing , he is filled with self congratulatory vibes
To be fair, he has a level of intellect that us mortals do not. I do feel though that maybe he's trying to get Chris to think more about it than he otherwise would
and his minions are available to clap for him
Very well put
Overly ambiguous about everything almost as if he is not allowed to say anything?
Is this a new interview? I love your interviews with Eric!
Yes. I think he posts the full one Monday
Jeffrey wanted Stephen to build him a Death Star.
The Lolita Star?
It already exists. Just ask the residents of Maui, Chile and Paradise California?
Yep i end the conversation right there when someone pauses like that
To me its someone trying to bully and control
So...String Theory is just the most expensive self-licking ice cream cone?
Haha that’s one euphemistic way to describe it
Yup. Self licking 😂
Awesome video Chris!
Erik has the opposite effect of Carl Sagon. Carl could make mind blowing ideas understandable to the layman.
Haha good comment!
YES YES YES! So much more powerful to make it easy for folks to understand. It can launch a miracle mind. This? Meh. Feels like theater.
Yes, but Eric is also a lot smarter than Sagan.
@@forsakenqueryHow can you assume considering if Sagan was alive today ? Just because he say things that people can't understand doesn't necessarely means the person automatically is intelligent , does it for you ? !
@@forsakenquerytheres is something about Eric that doesn't add up to me...don't know exactly what yet tho...Neil deGrasse in the other hand is a clear c-l'0-w-n...a distractor, maybe even an operative but EW is a mistery to me. Still can't read the guy, excessively articulated and the fact that he got umconfortable in answering the Hawking x Epstein's relation makes me umconfortable about him.
Not an auspicious start. Replying to questions with questions, asking what you thought was terrible about it when you hadn't.....he seems really up himself and no way am I going to watch the podcast. Have enjoyed many others though and look forward to more.
Stephen Hawking was world famous, he was widely respected, and he was vulnerable in many ways.
Pretty simple explanation.
Just answer the question.
Where`s the rest of this episode?
Thanks
Reading thru the comments. ‘Performative’ must be the knew buzzword to describe whatever it is that Eric and his type are.
it's lazy and annoying... and guessing there are a lot of precocious community college kids here
Who, What, When,Where,Why are Erics standard responses to Chris's questions.
When does this come out
Incredible conversation!!!!
Power out of Vibrations to Move something is the big thing.
Nah. It was just blackmail
I do believe its that simple. 100%
Right so Jeffrey wanted to know about high level physics so Mossad could design better defense systems
Nope.
It was about stopping research into gravity.
@@colinrobinson4233 what about gravity,,,
@@MrCinemuso yeah Soros, he owns BLM and Antifa and Swift, what more you need
Or they just blackmail anyone with any fame, influence and power in the west
@@ColmPadraig don’t need Hawking for that
Fascinating interview Chris, well played mate .
To kill,steal, and destroy / comes unfortunately in many packages 📦
Is it some kind of preview? Where can I watch the whole thing?
6:44 they stopped talking about it. Doesn’t mean they stopped it
The Eye of Horus on the can staring at the camera, not even trying to hide it
Are you Egyptian? What's significant about the 👁️?
next.....lmnt?
it's a long story@@dco1019
a set for each guy
long story@@dco1019
The answer is free energy
Name dropping. Epstein just wanted to have the name as a talking point.
"See how important I am. I met Stephen Hawking."
Special mathematics for his finances?! What utter nonsense.
I was interested in Stephen Hawking, does that mean I was interested in Limitless power?
Limitless?? SATORU GOJO MENTIONED 🗣🗣🗣💯💯💯RAAAAH WHAT THE FUCK IS A WORLD CUTTING DISMANTLE ♾️♾️
That depends: If you’re just interested in his work, that’s probably fine.
But if you’re trying to lure him into an international blackmail racket alongside many other powerful people. Then that’s a bit dodgy.
@@andybrice2711 Agreed, yet impossible to ever know now.
yes. yes it does.
They were nerding out a bit much…..if the question is what would Epstein (and the intel networks he works for) want with Stephen Hawking it might not be about understanding or possessing Hawking’s knowledge
They want to blackmail leading scientists so that they will support different agendas that they push
So whether you have a preventable pandemic or you’re wanting the world to obsess about the climate so that you can restructure society….if renowned scientists are in sync with the narrative/propaganda, it’s useful
So the real question is what other leading scientists are blackmailed?
Sounds like he's trying to distance himself from being on that island.
you link to all your comercials, but no link to full interview? wrong priorities
Did he ever answer the question?
Eric is one of my favorite guests on any podcast. Glad to see him again
He. Never. Really. Says. Anything.
Think. Physics. Bro.
I almost didn’t watch this because of the comments, but I took a chance and I can say for certain that he clearly answered it.
The relationship is physics. Why physics? He said when you understand physics or you can control those that understand it, you control the world. Why? Because those that can harness the power of physics can make nuclear bombs, travel space, control resources, etc.
I thought my internet was playing up watching this I literally refreshed UA-cam twice
Did hawking create a wormhole for Epstein to escape jail and travel to a Parallel island 😅
I worked at the SSC for General Dynamics in 1991 thru the contract termination. The reason it was shut down was due to mismanagement of funds by people in charge. It was also because those writing the checks had no idea what benefits were possible. Or what benefits could/would be developed just by attempting to achieve what CERN has. SSC would have done it decades earlier, imo. Those are the reasons.
Chris , Have yall discused CERN ?
In depth at all ?
Epstien simply put influential people together to attract them to his events. People puff up near other people of influence. If they want to appear smart they puff up next to people known for their intellect. Not my original idea. Neurobiologist Dr. Andrew Huberman’s. Makes sense
Yeah, it’s always hard for me to understand what Eric is getting at, TBH.
I have a great friend that is absolutely brilliant. Like a legitimate genius. He is the head of cyber security for an energy company.
He talks like this, where he thinks hes answering a question, but said a whole lot of what sounds like nonsense. After all my years, I think its a filter problem, in how they see the world, and rationalize it into words.
You can be interested in physics and be an evil person. It doesn't mean people interested in physics are evil.
He needed to steer popular scientific opinion away from the spiritual cosmology and make it focus on materialism... It's not that hard.....
Please Eric, open the Portal back up and put 5% of your time toward finding the right people and pressing on the right questions to get real answers! No one else seems willing or able!
This guy could’ve just said I don’t know
Then there would be no 4 hour podcast
@@user.1743 I’m sure Chris had more than one question to ask.
This is how esoteric cronyism works. In intelligence it is called a limited hangout.
Act smug as though you know and let people speculate and create their own red hearings.
It is a tactic.
Hes helping you think for yourself, whilst staying safe. Everyone just expects everything on a silver platter these days without considering the consequences or doing any hard work themselves
I’m picking up a “Cosmic Giggle” vibe from this “Eric” character. 🥳🤪🥳
Say more.
The way this man can break shit down is amazing
You can’t take out a city with a little physics. You take out a city with a little physics + a lot of engineering and labor. For my money, the engineers and mechanics (not quantum mechanics) that deserve most of the credit for nuclear energy.
I think you guys overthinking it. If an investor (broader sense, might be a state..) want to invest long term in tech, then bet in fields which potentially having very unexpected, long term tech impact. It is like Softbank betting on software (all software, whole field). Bio, Chem is a little old, crowded, Physics potentially has a lot of steam in it. Quantum, Materials-Semiconductors is already crowded, what do you bet on what no one used for tech yet? Far end f particle physics, cosmology, gravitation is on potential field that may have huge impact without people betting on it.
So wise that they become fools!
When Eric or Brett speak, I listen...amazing those Weinstein brothers
Annoyingly cryptic answers- or should I say- non-answers
why gravity? because you can move and accelerate more stuff faster if it weighs nothing?!
Maybe you hold leverage over physicists because you want them to work on a project of yours…
Epstein was a high school physics teacher, and he also craved prestige for obvious reasons, so to me that's the link.
I thought he was a math teacher. Did he teach physics also?
when is neutonic back in stock? havent been able to get my hands on it yet and it looks great!
Many of us are just waiting for others to catch up. Nobody is brave enough to talk to the normies. Except Eric.
ANother episode with Eric? The first one was one of the best podcasts, cant wait.
I can’t decide whether I really enjoy podcasts with Eric or loathe him entirely. Needlessly wordy at times, yet still interesting.
@@charliewalker9443yea I know, it’s hard to keep defending him lol, but his great moments are perfect
“ I have absolute power….yes” lol
What i really like about this format is how Weinstein throws questions back at Chris. It's much more interesting that a conventional interview where it all goes in one direction.
Poor Chris. He does not deserve such a rude guest. I would so much rather listen to Weinstein’s brother. this is excruciating to listen to. Truly brilliant people don’t need to spend any time reminding you that they are brilliant.
Wall Street and physicists go hand in hand ..
Painful
We had limitless energy with Tesla. But America wanted energy for people who would pay for it.
Obviously, the first step is to look at the 'people he was associated with....' Yes. Who was paying Jeffrey Epstein and who would benefit from Stephen Hawking's knowledge?
Perspective change of neutronic and water bottle on frame swap between Eric and Chris is so confusing
Dude right? Wtf lol i know i just smoked but im not THAT high
Thought this was playing in RealPlayer
😂
Think physics not money!
I love how Eric played one work meeting dropping papers off at Epstein’s office into three years of podcast material
😂😂😂
Wow... That is spot on. I have heard the story so often and heard it retreaded too often that it has taken on fantastical elements
Wow. Eric got a bit of a haircut finally
eraserhead
I like Eric. I dont understand why anyone can dislike him! What is there to hate? He is intelligent and kind and full of stories and interesting bits of information! And he is kindly n decent! ❤ Eric Weinstein!
Weinstein asks, who isn't interested in this? My Mom isn't interested in this.
To the people saying that he didn’t add much, he’s pulling ideas from the last time he was on. He’s saying we’re asking the wrong questions. Why are we concerned about Jeffry Epstein the person when we should be asking who is Jeffry Epstein the construct and why are the people who constructed him interested in physics or are they just using it as a veil?
The most simple answer to the question of what J Epstein wanted with physics is: If he got a sense for where physics was going in the future, he would know where to move his money to take advantage of that opportunity. It could be more than that though.
Or, Hawking was a person of influence, and when you are a leverage broker with no morals, you will take whatever you can to obtain more leverage. Hanging out with who the world thinks is a top science mind, gives u cred u can leverage.
@@brentjohnson9210 That too!