as a neuroscientist and philosopher, i think this is exciting- but unfortunately, a bit too ambitious of an interpretation of bci. the hard problem of consciousness (ie., how subjective experience arises from physical processes) isn’t clearly a computational process. understanding bci as a future ideal in the way explained presupposes that subjective conscious experience is computational. physical reductionists often sidestep the necessary ethical implications out of excitement for new tech developments, but we seriously need to chill out in my opinion beyond medical contexts. technology like this should not be recreational.
They're overthinking the process boss it would be better to attach this as a lexiconal, sonographically encoding process versus a synaptic interpretation. Highly invasive products inside a brain is completely idiotic😅 especially if your just trying to capture signals and interpret them. They really think we can update our brains with a chip.
Wow 👌 👏 👏 what a research contribution to the humankind great 👍 8:17
as a neuroscientist and philosopher, i think this is exciting- but unfortunately, a bit too ambitious of an interpretation of bci. the hard problem of consciousness (ie., how subjective experience arises from physical processes) isn’t clearly a computational process. understanding bci as a future ideal in the way explained presupposes that subjective conscious experience is computational. physical reductionists often sidestep the necessary ethical implications out of excitement for new tech developments, but we seriously need to chill out in my opinion beyond medical contexts. technology like this should not be recreational.
They're overthinking the process boss it would be better to attach this as a lexiconal, sonographically encoding process versus a synaptic interpretation. Highly invasive products inside a brain is completely idiotic😅 especially if your just trying to capture signals and interpret them. They really think we can update our brains with a chip.
nice
Thanks
It is real