Great work, Anthony! You really are providing a service to law enforcement and the public at large with your teaching. I hope you continue creating content for a long time!
great work. just curious. would it be possible to seize a motorist by holding on to the suspect's mirror or some other part of the vehicle's exterior during a consensual encounter?
Maybe. I would have to see it to really decide whether a reasonable person would feel free to leave. But generally, just touching the car or leaning on the car will likely not be enough.
Respectfully, the 2 step is bs and courts lose (ethical) credibility for upholding it. If lights flashing on the police vehicle tell you that you are detained, then in the absence of turning them off and pre-empting a new conversation with something like "You're no longer detained, but..." then there is an obvious ethical set of problems at play. To a reasonable person the situation is ambiguous at best and and is probably more often then not perceived as a continuation of the original stop unless the lights come off, or the driver actually leaves. How about just sticking to the mission of the stop. People would respect law enforcement more if they didn't feel like every encounter was an attempt for a cop to arrest them.
TOO ALL ACTORS/COSTUME PLAYERS RESEARCH [SUE POLICE] AND SEE ALL THE STUPID STUFF THEY DID TO GET SUED . AND LOOK UP TITLE18 SUC 242,245,247. COP CANT STOP U AT ALL BECAUSE ITS A FELONY TO ACTIVATE THE EMERGENCY LIGHTS FOR A NON EMERGENCY. ONLY POLICE WORKING UNDER COLOR OF LAW WILL COMMIT THE FRAUD.
What some people call proactive police others called dirty cops.
That is the Kansas 2 step and it has been ruled unconstitutional.
So that's why Columbo always turned around and said, "just one more thing."
Great work, Anthony! You really are providing a service to law enforcement and the public at large with your teaching. I hope you continue creating content for a long time!
I hadn't ever considered that practice before. It's a great idea, and funny too - entirely legal and moral but clever.
great work. just curious. would it be possible to seize a motorist by holding on to the suspect's mirror or some other part of the vehicle's exterior during a consensual encounter?
Maybe. I would have to see it to really decide whether a reasonable person would feel free to leave. But generally, just touching the car or leaning on the car will likely not be enough.
IOW cops are ALWAYS looking for an angle to investigate everyone.
Respectfully, the 2 step is bs and courts lose (ethical) credibility for upholding it. If lights flashing on the police vehicle tell you that you are detained, then in the absence of turning them off and pre-empting a new conversation with something like "You're no longer detained, but..." then there is an obvious ethical set of problems at play. To a reasonable person the situation is ambiguous at best and and is probably more often then not perceived as a continuation of the original stop unless the lights come off, or the driver actually leaves.
How about just sticking to the mission of the stop. People would respect law enforcement more if they didn't feel like every encounter was an attempt for a cop to arrest them.
COMMON L.A.W IS L.A.W.
NOT THE FICTION STATE.
Man I can’t stand cops.
TOO ALL ACTORS/COSTUME PLAYERS RESEARCH [SUE POLICE] AND SEE ALL THE STUPID STUFF THEY DID TO GET SUED . AND LOOK UP TITLE18 SUC 242,245,247.
COP CANT STOP U AT ALL BECAUSE ITS A FELONY TO ACTIVATE THE EMERGENCY LIGHTS FOR A NON EMERGENCY.
ONLY POLICE WORKING UNDER COLOR OF LAW WILL COMMIT THE FRAUD.