unbelievable place the accuracy precision and flat level and nubs awesome ty Vlad also some parts of the stone look like some kind of machines were locked into place here and there stone look like iron ore the way they were cut
Notice on the bottom of some walls the stone cut outs, especially behind that stone alter. These could be ancient plumbing holes. Some lines and indentations look like they would house pipes. I think that what we are seeing is the inside of walls and there was a space between those and an outer wall, since worn away through time. The texture on those stones look like they were meant to hold another layer on top... just a thought. Also in some of the doorways you can see that they were meant to contain swinging doors, the round circular slots at edge of top and bottom...
I've been to the Qorikancha several times and it is amazingly well reserved. When it Cuzco it is a "must see" place. Yes, it contains a lot of the amazing mortarless masonry we see in the other well known sites. Thankfully the Spanish didn't destroy it like that so may other sites in Peru. They made it a church.
Concrete, I've been waiting a very long time to see this evidence. There is no conceivable way to describe building such structures without the use of a material that does not have to be cut. The holes are for rope to hold the walls of the block form so it can be poured. There are notable striations on several blocks that it can be seen that the mortar was poured into the form on one end, causing angular striation as the form filled. There are other indications of this as well along the top of the wall. Next is to work out whether they were using quick lime! I believe they were, and that would be the specific tool that enabled such building. Quick-lime + Granite/Gabro is a very conceivable method for early people to derive structure. Crushing rock to create mortar is far more likely than any alien lasers or magic monks chanting holy saws through stone. Unfinished sections appear to be from them trying to work out how to complete the pours.
Just because the method to cut these stone is unknown today des not mean it was not done - concrete is cheap and ugly - the poured concrete structures have to constantly be reinforced - not a Bible person but Daniel was right when he called these times 'of the feet of clay' LoL
@TheDemonation13 Seems more likely Andesite, but still. Yes there is Basalt Concrete, even Basalt Rebar apparently. Thing is, we have to find a simple enough explanation that fits with the technologies they had. They had stone on stone tech, I don't recall Aztec metallurgy beyond precious metal like Gold. They certainly didn't leave much tech behind for us to figure it out.
Thank You for this wonderful video!! Such an amazing place! 🥰🥰🥰
very interesting!! thanks for this Vlad!!
Thanks Vlad. Great video.
Sooo faszinierend 😮… wie von einer anderen Welt … Super Videos !danke
Beautiful music
The perfection of the walls. Perfect joins, no mortar needed. Incredible tech to create this.
Clearly pre Inca.
unbelievable place the accuracy precision and flat level and nubs awesome ty Vlad also some parts of the stone look like some kind of machines were locked into place here and there stone look like iron ore the way they were cut
Notice on the bottom of some walls the stone cut outs, especially behind that stone alter. These could be ancient plumbing holes. Some lines and indentations look like they would house pipes. I think that what we are seeing is the inside of walls and there was a space between those and an outer wall, since worn away through time. The texture on those stones look like they were meant to hold another layer on top... just a thought. Also in some of the doorways you can see that they were meant to contain swinging doors, the round circular slots at edge of top and bottom...
I've been to the Qorikancha several times and it is amazingly well reserved. When it Cuzco it is a "must see" place. Yes, it contains a lot of the amazing mortarless masonry we see in the other well known sites. Thankfully the Spanish didn't destroy it like that so may other sites in Peru. They made it a church.
So strange, it looks like a Stargate construction but from prehistoric times. What kind of people build this ?
We need a Tele-time machine ....
Thanks for watching. Yes , need a time machine (very need)
Also thank you for your first comment here !
5:35 These holes are reminiscent of water channels in heating tiles. Was central heating installed here?
Shared :)
Some may say this is fallen Angel technology
The falling ones along with the nephilim they build these buildings globally
These structures were not made by regular humans.not at all the people that came after they found these buildings and used them.
Concrete, I've been waiting a very long time to see this evidence. There is no conceivable way to describe building such structures without the use of a material that does not have to be cut. The holes are for rope to hold the walls of the block form so it can be poured. There are notable striations on several blocks that it can be seen that the mortar was poured into the form on one end, causing angular striation as the form filled. There are other indications of this as well along the top of the wall. Next is to work out whether they were using quick lime! I believe they were, and that would be the specific tool that enabled such building. Quick-lime + Granite/Gabro is a very conceivable method for early people to derive structure. Crushing rock to create mortar is far more likely than any alien lasers or magic monks chanting holy saws through stone. Unfinished sections appear to be from them trying to work out how to complete the pours.
is basalt no know basalt concrete but who knows
also i used to clean concrete factories the floors were iron powder mixed with concrete or called iron crete very hard indeed
Just because the method to cut these stone is unknown today des not mean it was not done - concrete is cheap and ugly - the poured concrete structures have to constantly be reinforced - not a Bible person but Daniel was right when he called these times 'of the feet of clay' LoL
@TheDemonation13 Seems more likely Andesite, but still. Yes there is Basalt Concrete, even Basalt Rebar apparently. Thing is, we have to find a simple enough explanation that fits with the technologies they had. They had stone on stone tech, I don't recall Aztec metallurgy beyond precious metal like Gold. They certainly didn't leave much tech behind for us to figure it out.
how or where did they powder anbicite to make it into concrete ?