I was just going to ask about mixing runner lengths to broaden the torque table, so I'm glad you mentioned this in the video. When will you have these results available?
Exactly what I thought! If we have stock runners chances are we want to see what the difference would be moving to shorter runners. I am running full length on my Darton 427 but I doubt I would pick up anything up top worth loosing hp in mid range. Ive reved my old 408 to 7500 but its hell on the valve train.
![Testing LS Intakes! Which LS3 Intake Makes the Most Power? [Can Stock Keep Up?]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/uMYlKeNmFuI/mqdefault.jpg)
![Testing LS Intakes! Which LS3 Intake Makes the Most Power? [Can Stock Keep Up?]](/img/tr.png)
I was just going to ask about mixing runner lengths to broaden the torque table, so I'm glad you mentioned this in the video. When will you have these results available?
I've been eagerly awaiting this! Is there not going to be anything for cathedral heads though? That'd be a bummer:/
yea i was wondering the same thing
OK.....but why no dyno with the standard length runners?
Exactly what I thought! If we have stock runners chances are we want to see what the difference would be moving to shorter runners. I am running full length on my Darton 427 but I doubt I would pick up anything up top worth loosing hp in mid range. Ive reved my old 408 to 7500 but its hell on the valve train.
Would they fit on a ls2 with a 92mm manifold intake?
Where's the LS1 and LS7 runners?
James Short EXACTLY! thats why I am making some for a 427 build
Richard holdner showed opposite lol
Would they fit on a ls2 with a 92mm manifold intake?