The Iowa class ships may have 16 inch guns and long range but there armor is small compard to Yamato and Yamato could destoy a Iowa class ship in 1 salvo with its 20 inch guns
Yamato has 18 inch not 20 inch. Iowa class has the advantage of speed and could easily turn around once Yamato is spotted if they choose to. I don’t think only one salvo could take it down
@@D.AKULA_TK208 iowa would destroy Yamato. Faster better radar bigger caliber better electronics more support. Everything about iowa was better than Yamato beside the 18 inch 45 cal guns. And god forbid if it wasn't a clear day the iowa would outrage it all day taking pot shot with the super heavy. Yamato was inferior in every way except shell diameter.
They advantage is the better penetrating power, but its a hard fight because both ships was going to have an escort, or allied battleships, aicrafts, etc.
I misspelled that it's Surigao straits,and yes there was a battle of San Bernardino too but I should have just said : Battle of Leyte gulf,which would have been more accurate.
24adithyanonline could have happened at Leyte Gulf if Halsey would have left them behind with Taffy 3 instead of taking everything with him to go after the decoy force of carriers
The Ford Mk 1 radar system would and did provide a overwhelming advantage at high speed, zero visibility and rates of fire. Once this system was in place no IJN ship stood a chance
Yamato probably would have been in trouble against a single Iowa.Would have depended on conditions of the engagement.Iowas were faster,and had radar aimed guns.Yamato was huge,with quite a punch.The American16”AP round was better than anything the Japanese had.Still,theres no telling who has the luck until the bodies hit the floor
@@D.AKULA_TK208 Am.. no. Once again, nothing here resembles anything even remotely close to how neither Musashi nor Yamato sunk. First off, it didn't take 2-3 min. Second, both broke apart on the way down. Don't remember if one or more of the ammo compartments exploded before they went under, or if it occurred below the surface. Or, if it was simply because of the immense pressure on the way down, or a combination of the two. But most shipwrecks that rests at depths deeper than 300-400 m or so I'm guessing, usually gets torn into shreds on the way down. This is because the watertight compartments that haven't been flooded and so are still holding air, will explode sooner or later when the pressure reaches their breaking point. The ships also usually gets more or less "pancaked" when they violently, at high speed, hits the seafloor.
Yeah definitely! Because it's so hard to hit a target of that size from what, 2-1 km?? And especially when it's not even firing back.. yes I'm being very sarcastic here. I mean seriously, that's practically bajonett range for a battleship.. Hah! And with that said, this just got to be the worst gameplay video I've ever seen hands down. Wtf was this even!??! And that rate of fire?? Are you f*ckin kidding me?? It's like a shot each 2-3 second per gun.. Yeeah no, it took a lot longer than that, let's just put it that way.. smh.
@@D.AKULA_TK208 Thanks for the reply! And yes, I do get that. However, a lot of this comment section doesn't from the looks of it. I.e. they understand it's a gameplay video, yet think it's quite accurate. Also, why does the game have to be inaccurate? Any special reason? Coz I thought that all of these new battle games, most of them I guess are online only now? Aim to be as accurate as possible. It seems to me that these games have at least two goals. One, to offer entertaining, intense and exiting gaming. Two, teach people about war history. And more precisely the technical specs and performances of these warships, or tanks, or airplanes etc. Hell, World of warships even makes mini docs about any new ship they introduce into the game. Also.. what's "intreteriment" heeh!😅 Just joking with ya.. sorry, couldn't help myself!
You underestimate the power of Japan that was only just a test but when you get the whole Japanese Fleet on your tail the Iowa will cease to exist and the Bismarck will hunt down the Iowa and since Germany and Japan came together Bismarck can just avenge Yamato
Come on Iowa make us proud, I still play this game at least once a month since it came out
One of the iowa class battleships could have destroyed the Yamato in my opinion but we'll never know.
The Iowa class ships may have 16 inch guns and long range but there armor is small compard to Yamato and Yamato could destoy a Iowa class ship in 1 salvo with its 20 inch guns
Yamato has 18 inch not 20 inch. Iowa class has the advantage of speed and could easily turn around once Yamato is spotted if they choose to. I don’t think only one salvo could take it down
@@publicservicesinhawaii429 they (US) had good damage control
@@D.AKULA_TK208 iowa would destroy Yamato. Faster better radar bigger caliber better electronics more support. Everything about iowa was better than Yamato beside the 18 inch 45 cal guns. And god forbid if it wasn't a clear day the iowa would outrage it all day taking pot shot with the super heavy. Yamato was inferior in every way except shell diameter.
They advantage is the better penetrating power, but its a hard fight because both ships was going to have an escort, or allied battleships, aicrafts, etc.
The yamato sank like musashi
Jasmine Sanga musashi wasn’t the ship that sank dumbass,it’s been proven for a long time it was Yamato who was bombarded not the musashi
@@helixmerciful what are you talking about dumbass the musashi sank at the battle of leyte gulf
Musasi is still alive not yamato the ship at japan is musasi
@@chikim2607 musashi sank
@@helixmerciful small brain moment
Nice!And that's what would have happened at Saragato strait if Halsey wouldn't have went after the decoy fleet.
I misspelled that it's Surigao straits,and yes there was a battle of San Bernardino too but I should have just said : Battle of Leyte gulf,which would have been more accurate.
thomas Gokey
You are correct sir.
@@nighthawk8053
Meh Yamato would sunk them all...before they close to 14.85 km to pierce Yamato belt!
@@WadcaWymiaru they had a chance,but Taffy 6's destroyers ran Yamato off ,lol
Another way the Yamato could die other than air bombing the ship. We could've just sent the USS Iowa and the USS Misouri.
24adithyanonline could have happened at Leyte Gulf if Halsey would have left them behind with Taffy 3 instead of taking everything with him to go after the decoy force of carriers
yamato took a beating there, US gunners were pretty acurate
Loran Rocha i know right lol
RADAR advantage
US battleships had fire control radar where the Japanese didn't.
2 vs 1, when 2 ships are better than the one
In reality, in those kind of weather/sea conditions a single Iowa Class would have been able to take the Yamato probably 75% of the time.
the yamato got murdered😂😂
Niroshun Weerakkody I know I thought they are going to be easy on it lol
Epiic soniickzz me too 😂
Brennan Barker >:D
lol
Just the Missouri could of dont it them 16inch guns :)
High Atlantic swells in the Pacific?
The Ford Mk 1 radar system would and did provide a overwhelming advantage at high speed, zero visibility and rates of fire. Once this system was in place no IJN ship stood a chance
Pls do 2 aircraft ship and 2 battle ship of Japanese and 4 us battle ships
Sorry can’t spell
forget it man have a good day
AMEN
Yamato probably would have been in trouble against a single Iowa.Would have depended on conditions of the engagement.Iowas were faster,and had radar aimed guns.Yamato was huge,with quite a punch.The American16”AP round was better than anything the Japanese had.Still,theres no telling who has the luck until the bodies hit the floor
I like the USS Iowa and USS Missouri battleships.
Yamato almost sunk like her sister. In the game
No, absolutely not.. plz watch some serious docs on those two battle ships before dropping foolish comments.
@@Superknullisch She really sunk how Musashi, on the truth, Yamato just turn, musashi gives a little sunk by the bow and turn, how in the game
@@D.AKULA_TK208 Am.. no. Once again, nothing here resembles anything even remotely close to how neither Musashi nor Yamato sunk. First off, it didn't take 2-3 min. Second, both broke apart on the way down. Don't remember if one or more of the ammo compartments exploded before they went under, or if it occurred below the surface. Or, if it was simply because of the immense pressure on the way down, or a combination of the two. But most shipwrecks that rests at depths deeper than 300-400 m or so I'm guessing, usually gets torn into shreds on the way down. This is because the watertight compartments that haven't been flooded and so are still holding air, will explode sooner or later when the pressure reaches their breaking point. The ships also usually gets more or less "pancaked" when they violently, at high speed, hits the seafloor.
Missouri and Iowa can deal high damage per minute in yamato
how you can do this in submarine game??
Mission editor
please do the yamato capsize using torpedo please
Yeah she sank like musashi
We almost copy comments.
What game is this???
Silent Hunter 3
Well done my gunners
Yeah definitely! Because it's so hard to hit a target of that size from what, 2-1 km?? And especially when it's not even firing back.. yes I'm being very sarcastic here. I mean seriously, that's practically bajonett range for a battleship.. Hah! And with that said, this just got to be the worst gameplay video I've ever seen hands down. Wtf was this even!??! And that rate of fire?? Are you f*ckin kidding me?? It's like a shot each 2-3 second per gun.. Yeeah no, it took a lot longer than that, let's just put it that way.. smh.
@@Superknullisch this is a video / a game for entertainment, not to show what really happen in real life.
@@D.AKULA_TK208 Thanks for the reply! And yes, I do get that. However, a lot of this comment section doesn't from the looks of it. I.e. they understand it's a gameplay video, yet think it's quite accurate. Also, why does the game have to be inaccurate? Any special reason? Coz I thought that all of these new battle games, most of them I guess are online only now? Aim to be as accurate as possible. It seems to me that these games have at least two goals. One, to offer entertaining, intense and exiting gaming. Two, teach people about war history. And more precisely the technical specs and performances of these warships, or tanks, or airplanes etc. Hell, World of warships even makes mini docs about any new ship they introduce into the game.
Also.. what's "intreteriment" heeh!😅
Just joking with ya.. sorry, couldn't help myself!
What is the weapons strongest on the sea:(almost all people will say is the yamato)but this was more than:The MIGHTY TORPEDOES:)))
Why the yamato only his five inch gun only fire and his mane battery never fire
Idk
Was zur Hölle hat das deutsche U Boot da verloren., Iowa, Missouri und Yamato sollen das unter sich ausmachen!!!
Is this even a real battle?
Cuz the Yamato told lose against the Iowa in the Missouri
Putting her through the gauntlet
What game name
I am dead. Not big suprise.
Rate of fire won this one
You underestimate the power of Japan that was only just a test but when you get the whole Japanese Fleet on your tail the Iowa will cease to exist and the Bismarck will hunt down the Iowa and since Germany and Japan came together Bismarck can just avenge Yamato
And then some BBs (A few standards and a couple BBs of the North Carolina and South Dakota classes) arrive to give Bismarck a good ol' beating
BB-63 uss missouri is the strongest battleship in the world
Yea no..
H-44:
_Im a F U C K I N G joke for this dude XD_
The Yamato...an easy kill for the Missouri.
ミズーリも居たのか～い!!
日本人だァ！
Do their mains really reload that fast and yamato's guns don't ?
No, on the reality, Yamato guns had faster reload than the iowas, how in the WoWs.
ijn musashi if it was would Win yamato
Ok i love the video but yamato will sink of course 1v2 not fer
BB-61IOWAwin
Missouri and Iowa won
Yamato is killed
Again