BB6 update

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 28 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 26

  • @HamboneHQ
    @HamboneHQ 2 роки тому +5

    Maybe it should be called BBR 41? Make it different from BBR 1-5.

  • @Lt.Dan..
    @Lt.Dan.. 2 роки тому +4

    Super excited!!

  • @mathiasgregersen6886
    @mathiasgregersen6886 2 роки тому

    Interesting! Analysis of G40 Turn 1 spot on. Good luck on the developments to the both of you!

  • @nathangayner7592
    @nathangayner7592 2 роки тому

    Love the combined attack idea. Worried about the aircraft carrier extended range idea.

    • @TheGlobalWarVeteran
      @TheGlobalWarVeteran 2 роки тому

      I think I like both, but it’ll certainly make things complicated and more difficult to decide what to do for your turn and how to defend against planes that can move soo far….

  • @ericbinkley2209
    @ericbinkley2209 2 роки тому +2

    I tried the mech pulling the artillery it works in Non combat only if u let them move together in attack mode people stop buying tanks I rather roll 2 at 2 than 1 at 3

  • @nathangayner7592
    @nathangayner7592 2 роки тому +5

    Have you ever thought of only having one movement phase, similar to A&A 1914? I’ve never liked that you can noncom move into a zone based on already knowing the exact outcome of all the combats. Just never seemed realistic. The game should simulate one turn, per turn, not two.

  • @mr.shannonphillips7670
    @mr.shannonphillips7670 2 роки тому

    I think Blitzkrieg was the word you were looking for.

  • @mr.shannonphillips7670
    @mr.shannonphillips7670 2 роки тому

    Love this Idea!

  • @CBs_Bill_from_Montana
    @CBs_Bill_from_Montana 2 роки тому

    Wow! Starting in 41 is the perfect fix!! Can’t wait until next October!!! A lot of play testing will probably be needed. Wish I could be there to do it.

  • @dela7443
    @dela7443 2 роки тому

    Great News, looking forward for further Details 👍
    Just one off topic question. I just found your Blood Bath rules and digged into it.
    I tried to register on your Homepage already twice but I did not get access yet.
    Are you still running the site? I used two different Mail addresses.
    Thank you and greetings from Germany 👍

    • @dela7443
      @dela7443 2 роки тому

      Okay... Never mind 😂 Just found your Video about the Website... Sad story for me Bro

  • @ericpoppleton9119
    @ericpoppleton9119 Рік тому

    Having all the Axis go at once and then all the allies go at once could allow for more playable nations. In Axis and Allies if you break up a power into different playable nations it weakens them a lot. In this it wouldn't be as bad.
    For example: You could have 3 Axis Payers in Europe.
    1. Germany
    2. Italy
    3. Minor Axis Powers (Romania/Bulgaria/Hungry)
    Although I am excited because I always have too many people who want to play, so the more players the better.

  • @marshalvladimir8859
    @marshalvladimir8859 2 роки тому

    Would you be interested in adding 'In Port" rules for boats?

  • @panzerjaypatton331
    @panzerjaypatton331 2 роки тому +2

    Sounds exciting!

  • @palious13
    @palious13 2 роки тому

    Sounds great! I can't wait to start developing my strategies.

  • @TheGlobalWarVeteran
    @TheGlobalWarVeteran 2 роки тому

    Maybe adopt the path to victory map (available to look over on TripleA)

  • @beatletull6128
    @beatletull6128 2 роки тому

    Interesting that the American Fleet in Hawaii will only be taken out by Japanese airplanes. When Hawaii was attacked, Japan opened up a can of whip ass for the Americans. Production in America became very strong and progressive for the full out war in the Pacific. My thought, is maybe there should be an N.O. for the U.S. when Hawaii is attacked. Example: ONE TIME ONLY: During a J1 attack (only) on the Hawaii fleet - America receives a total IPC of ship loss to either replace the ships destroyed or to spend on any other items. Again, the U.S. went heavy on production. This puts the U.S. one turn behind and this N.O. would also make the Japanese consider twice before attacking. OR, the N.O. could be half the cost of the ships destroyed. Thoughts?

  • @beatletull6128
    @beatletull6128 2 роки тому

    I'd go with Bloodbath 1941. 1941a for the first run. If you're going to have more changes later, make it 1941b on the second run. and so on.

  • @diltonweany7003
    @diltonweany7003 2 роки тому

    Speaking of planes in the pacific, I’ve always wanted bombing from Iwo Jima/Okinawa to have more of an impact. Something to Knock Japan out without needing to liberate China or land troops on the home island. Maybe a VP?

  • @HamboneHQ
    @HamboneHQ 2 роки тому +2

    Yes, the video is recording!

  • @sgtshultzie5717
    @sgtshultzie5717 2 роки тому

    In our current house rules project we've moved the Brit fleet from 111 to 109 and the 110 fleet to 111(works well) we did experiment with the Afrika Corps a little...probably next game we'll bring it back(troops in N Africa)

  • @LtKraken
    @LtKraken 2 роки тому

    dang, just learning BBR V

  • @ericbinkley2209
    @ericbinkley2209 2 роки тому

    1941 ortegaz set up I love it check it out

  • @HamboneHQ
    @HamboneHQ 2 роки тому +3

    Battle of Britain