CINCINIATI 2018 FOR HIS SIGNIFICIANCE BECAUSE DJOKOVIC BECAME THE FIRST MEN IN HISTORY TO WON ALL NINE MASTERS 1000 (IVAN LENDL DID ALSO) EVEN YOU ON THE SITE YOU PUT HIS VICTORY IN YELLOW'S COLOUR WHO PUTTING ATTENTION ON US
@Michael Ponticello I didnt say its a bad idea i said we dont need it know when they are all(big3) going to retire in 5 years and for ex if we have one from nextyear on Djokovic is clear favourite and he is going to win it probably 4 times and all of you are going to say but if it was organised before Federer would have won 8 and i agree and thats why i dont want that to happen...
@Michael Ponticello Would Djokovic not have played all those grass court masters 😂🤣? Federer ain't invincible on grass. He has lost 3 Wimbledon finals to Djokovic and the Olympic gold title match 2012 to Murray. He is the greatest grass court player but to say that he would have won everything on grass is foolish
The video shows that why Murray was considered as a member of Big 4 once. His consistency and achievements in the begining and in the middle of the 2010’s are great. It’s the difference between him and Wawrinka.
@Oliver McCall No way, he's never been number 1, has fewer deep slam runs, has 13 fewer masters titles, has a worse h2h vs most top players, no singles medals, fewer titles. Do you only watch slams? lol
Murray is better than Wawrinka aand my milesss... You can easily make a case that Stan got very lucky with 3 of his slams coming against injured players in the final, but Murray has always been there even perhaps very unlucky with losing so many slam finals to Big 3.
@@vaishnamahendran718 true, Wawrinka got 3 lucky slams while big 3 were injured, on the other hand i consider Murray to be maybe even in top 10 greatest players of all time. Andy could have easily won more than 10+ slams had there not been for Big 3
@@GamEleON1 No way he got lucky during those tournaments. FO 2015: blasted Federer and Djokovic away. He delivered a phenomenal performance against Djokovic especially. He also beat a fit Djokovic at AO 2014 in 5 sets. And just because ND had a couple of blisters during the US open final 2016, that's nothing to take away from Wawrinkas slams. He was the deserving winner in every one of those. No doubt about that.
It is so strange to think that in 30 years on, we will be watching highlights of Federer, Nadal, Djokovic and many other great players. And our idols will be like we watch Rod Laver now, old but knowing they were absolute legends and we watched them live and achieving records that seemed to be unbreakable
I don’t think any player will be able to achieve anything that will put them on the level that we view those three. even if a player does match their numbers people will say they didn’t have the same level of competition
And those 300 are with 13 yrs before 1st Fed's title... so those numbers are actually even much better when You take it out of less than 200 finals in total...
We can argue about who is the GOAT out of the 3 BUT we all can agree that these 3 are so far ahead of everyone else. Combined GOAT that we all can agree on :)
This is an Absolute Masterclass of a Compilation from ATP Tennis TV. I enjoyed every single minute of this 2-hours special and my respect goes out to all of these Great Champions who have won these various Masters 1000 Titles throughout their Careers and also GS as well. Watching the Old Generation (Becker, Edberg, Sampras, Agassi, Chang, Courier, Rafter, Ferrero, Muster, Coria, Ivanisevic etc.) making way for the new was also great to watch and boy did they create some of the insurmountable records in Tennis History with the likes of Federer, Nadal and Djokovic. Now, a New Generation is transitioning again. I enjoyed this thoroughly. The Intro in the beginning got me emotional. So many Great Champions in that 30-second Intro. I'm glad I started to watch Tennis and it is a privilege to watch these Champions winning these Titles in their illustrious careers.
2012 is such an underrated year. You had every member of the big three in peak form, and Murray. Apart from Paris, Nadal Federer and Djokovic won all the Masters 1000s. And they spilt all four slams (including Murray). Brilliant year for tennis.
2009 as well. Very competitive year, Davydenko, Del Potro, Soderling, Roddick, Murray all doing well, and last true prime Federer year imo (arguably first half or so of 17 too but seemed more of a resurgence)
@@cbockiii2514 I remember clear as daylight , that or the year b4 Andy hired Ivan Lendl as his coach after that he literally transformed himself to what he is now today. After Murray lost in Wimbledon final I knew he was hungry for redemption and was looking good . I couldn't sleep and had dreams that Fed won O was so disappointed lol. Murray was a "heel/villain" back then besides the top3 , like Medvedev now
@@bamssudardjo2572 Shanghai? Nadal already won Madrid indoor on hard court 2005 because if Madrid was change surface on clay court replaced Hamburg 2009. Nadal has won titles 7 out of 9 all ATP 1000 Masters. Nadal never won a title Miami open and Paris.
Amazing to watch 30 years of amazing players. Most aesthetically pleasing players to watch are Federer and Sampras. Best player I think goes to Djokovic as he really doesn’t have a weakness except for his smash
@@thebravegurkhas7832Wish we could know what was in that special cocktail his team give to him when he's losing a match or what he does in that bathroom break too😢
I’m so proud of Nole. He has come a long way & has shown vast improvements from the time he was a skinny kid with health issues up to now, winning the most masters titles and the only player with double golden masters
You have to feel that Andy Murray was up there with the big three in his ‘primes’ in 2010 and 2016 if you look at Shanghai 2010 and the Wimbledon finals he both won in straight sets
Yeah even in 08 he was up there with Djokovic imo at least. Gave Nadal & Federer run for their money even before 08, had wrist injury in 07. Very misleading to judge Wawrinka & Murray on the basis they both won 3 slams, Andy was much more consistent and on top week to week
LOVE this vid! A lot of the younger tennis fans (who’ve just started watching the sport over the last 5-10 years) probably aren’t aware of how many GREAT players were around in the 90s. Chang was an EXCELLENT player who won so many Masters 1000s and was great on all surfaces. Becker might be more associated with the 80s, but he was a fantastic player throughout much of the 90s as well. Also loved seeing Muster winning all the Masters 1000s that he did as well
This video just proves why Murray is so much better than Stan and it shouldn't be even a debate. Murray has 14 Masters 1000 and 1 atp finals in comparison to 1 masters 1000 of stan
Didn't know Andrei Medvedev won 4 Masters, all on clay. But yet, he only had 3 good runs at the FO. And of course, Marcelo Rios, the only slamless #1 in ATP history, I believe.
I mean at that point Nadal had 18 Federer 17 and Djokovic 5 masters and now he have the most(36) and have double golden masters(nobody even won one) feels insane.
@@pettitlawncarelandscaping419 Shanghai would be the wrong one to get rid of as it's the only big tournament in the whole of asia. USA don't need three masters and a slam. Paris could also be the one to go, one city doesn't need a slam and a masters.
Great compilation, worth watching for almost 2 hours. Lot of great champions, just a couple of "intruders". So the best player never to win Masters 1000 must be 2 time Grand Slam champion Kafelnikov. What a about best player never to win ATP Finals? Well, I think we all know the answer- Rafael Nadal of course
Djokovic took 12 years since his first title to get all Master 1000 titles (9 in total), he got them all in 2018 for the first time, in 2020 he got his Second Career Golden Master title. Nadal is still looking to get it at least once, as well as Federer. #funfact
Seeing the 2002-2003 bit was really interesting for me, with Hewitt really showing his talent (now I realize how much he won before Federer, who had like a 7-match losing streak against him I believe) with Agassi and Moya still sticking in there. That was pretty much the last really varied year in terms of big tournament wins. Ever since then it’s all a very select group of players, probably because the sport has become much more serious over the years. You truly have to be the best and devote your whole upbringing to the sport to get anywhere. Well, unless you’re Kyrgios... But yeah, 2003 had like ten different players win a tournament whereas in 2009 it’s like three
@@AlanRR121 How are they hacks? Mantilla was top ten and Pavel was top 15. Just cuz u started following tennis 3 years ago and havent heard of them doesnt make them hacks. And even if they were lower ranked, stop with the tennis elitism. The ppl who win deserve to win because they had an amazing week where they played as if they were top 5 players at the least. Who cares if they dont have the consistency of other freaks of nature, they put in much harder work into tennis than most ppl do on anything
@@jeannemarddelislam1631 I see it on ultimatetennisstatistics.com but Masters began on 1990 and Atp only count since this time , Can you tell me reason?
@1 % of % 1 And Canas is tied with Federer for h2h, but I wouldn't ex-act ly look at them as equals. H2H is something that matters when you look at people like Federer, Djoković and Nadal, so guys with countless big titles and weeks on number 1 spot and countless matches between each other. Not between one man who actually has multiple major titles and one who hasn't won anything.
Murray and Roddick would’ve been so much more successful if it wasn’t for Djokovic and Federer. Edit: I meant Roddick would’ve been much more successful if it wasn’t for Federer and Murray would’ve been more successful if it wasn’t for Djokovic
@@vivmartica.438 Murray's a far superior player to Roddick. But it's pointless for people to say "if it wasn't for x, y would have been more successful". Have to deal with reality.
Omg what a brilliant brilliant upload. Tennis fans like me are so fortunate to have people like yourself and the many others on UA-cam who upload these great tennis videos. Thank you so so much.
That was awesome brought back a lot of memories, and some I forgot about so many great players that performed at such high levels for a long period of time.
Honestly thought sampras would have won more than he did. Even though he won quite a bit. There’s such a huge difference between the 80’s, 90’s, and early 2000’s with so many different winners as opposed to now with the big 4 winning 99% of them lol
Lmao over half the video is Fed/Nadal/Novak, they literally ruled 20 years. Like almost 100 masters titles between them. Bizarre. The fact that Nadal literally won every clay tournament almost every year is scary. I forgot how dominant he was then and still now.
Not to take away Rafa's incredible achievements on clay but your statement is very wrong. He never won literally every clay tournament in a single year (that would be impossible). He did win all three clay masters and Roland Garros one time in 2010.
Sergio Sarmiento he had 35 masters titles and most are clay, he also has won 12 RG in 15 years, that’s pretty much dominating. I didn’t mean he won all of them, but compared to other people he won so much.
12:20 it was on the line. Also at 15:30 same thing. Same tournament 93 and 94, same two players Chang and Edberg and same two scenarios. What were the odds on that?
Most number of titles to the 🐐 Djokovic. Only guy to win them all. And he has won them all at least twice. Djokovic faced a lot of tough losses and then came back to win the titles, unlike Roger and Rafa.
It would be interesting to know what percentage of Masters 1000 & ATP Finals titles, Novak, Roger, Nadal and Murray have won since 2005. Must be like 80%....
The question is who is going to end up with the most titles. I'd bet on Djokovic because he's younger and playing so well right now, but it could easily be Nadal. Federer has to have another incredible year to stay on top of them.
Ferrer, Tsonga, Nishikori, Isner have all played more 1000 finals than Wawrinka. Goffin, Simon and Gasquet have played the same amount. Yet Stan has 3 Grand Slams. Stan is a weird, awesome man.
No, Wawrinka has played more Masters finals than them. In Masters finals Wawrinka is 1-3, Goffin is 0-1, Simon is 0-2, and Gasquet is 0-3. But you'd think Wawrinka would have at least 4 or 5
@@pettitlawncarelandscaping419 Does that include ATP Finals at the end of the year. Cause Goffin appears there as well. We can see him twice in finals this video.
What's your favourite Masters 1000 memory? (You've got 30 years to choose from, so think carefully ;) )
All of Rafa’s wins.
ALL FEDERER #GOAT
ALL Djokovic wins
Nalbandian in Paris 👑
CINCINIATI 2018 FOR HIS SIGNIFICIANCE BECAUSE DJOKOVIC BECAME THE FIRST MEN IN HISTORY TO WON ALL NINE MASTERS 1000 (IVAN LENDL DID ALSO) EVEN YOU ON THE SITE YOU PUT HIS VICTORY IN YELLOW'S COLOUR WHO PUTTING ATTENTION ON US
We seriously need a grass masters 1000 placed right before wimbledon
We really dont need it now.Wait until all big 3 retire and then do what ever you want...
@Michael Ponticello I didnt say its a bad idea i said we dont need it know when they are all(big3) going to retire in 5 years and for ex if we have one from nextyear on Djokovic is clear favourite and he is going to win it probably 4 times and all of you are going to say but if it was organised before Federer would have won 8 and i agree and thats why i dont want that to happen...
we need a master 1000 for south america!
@Michael Ponticello Would Djokovic not have played all those grass court masters 😂🤣? Federer ain't invincible on grass. He has lost 3 Wimbledon finals to Djokovic and the Olympic gold title match 2012 to Murray. He is the greatest grass court player but to say that he would have won everything on grass is foolish
@@NamTran-xc2ip you realize that Federer Is 6 years older, right? And that Nadal and Djokovic don't have valid younger rivals?
One of the most amazing compliations ever.
Lots of career defining moments
lots*
@@gilhoffman3468 thanks
The video shows that why Murray was considered as a member of Big 4 once. His consistency and achievements in the begining and in the middle of the 2010’s are great. It’s the difference between him and Wawrinka.
And 2 olympic gold, dont forget that
@Oliver McCall No way, he's never been number 1, has fewer deep slam runs, has 13 fewer masters titles, has a worse h2h vs most top players, no singles medals, fewer titles. Do you only watch slams? lol
Murray is better than Wawrinka aand my milesss... You can easily make a case that Stan got very lucky with 3 of his slams coming against injured players in the final, but Murray has always been there even perhaps very unlucky with losing so many slam finals to Big 3.
@@vaishnamahendran718 true, Wawrinka got 3 lucky slams while big 3 were injured, on the other hand i consider Murray to be maybe even in top 10 greatest players of all time. Andy could have easily won more than 10+ slams had there not been for Big 3
@@GamEleON1 No way he got lucky during those tournaments. FO 2015: blasted Federer and Djokovic away. He delivered a phenomenal performance against Djokovic especially. He also beat a fit Djokovic at AO 2014 in 5 sets. And just because ND had a couple of blisters during the US open final 2016, that's nothing to take away from Wawrinkas slams. He was the deserving winner in every one of those. No doubt about that.
no one:
absolutely no one:
sports commentator: he's done it
@Press and Hold ! Touché mate 👍🎾
I see Caucasian people only..., that must be some kind of rasism LOL
@@hunter1211 It is actually
It is so strange to think that in 30 years on, we will be watching highlights of Federer, Nadal, Djokovic and many other great players. And our idols will be like we watch Rod Laver now, old but knowing they were absolute legends and we watched them live and achieving records that seemed to be unbreakable
You should screenshot this and keep it for when that occurs.
I don’t think any player will be able to achieve anything that will put them on the level that we view those three. even if a player does match their numbers people will say they didn’t have the same level of competition
Out of 300 finals:
1. Djokovic won 39 (13%)
2. Nadal won 35 (11.67%)
3. Federer won 34 (11.33)
What an achievements!
And those 300 are with 13 yrs before 1st Fed's title... so those numbers are actually even much better when You take it out of less than 200 finals in total...
We can argue about who is the GOAT out of the 3 BUT we all can agree that these 3 are so far ahead of everyone else. Combined GOAT that we all can agree on :)
@@codegeek-il5fm it would be out of 150 not 300 because their time started from 2004/2005
Federer won 28 finals
Amazing achievement. These guys are not human. Well done to Murray too.
This is an Absolute Masterclass of a Compilation from ATP Tennis TV. I enjoyed every single minute of this 2-hours special and my respect goes out to all of these Great Champions who have won these various Masters 1000 Titles throughout their Careers and also GS as well. Watching the Old Generation (Becker, Edberg, Sampras, Agassi, Chang, Courier, Rafter, Ferrero, Muster, Coria, Ivanisevic etc.) making way for the new was also great to watch and boy did they create some of the insurmountable records in Tennis History with the likes of Federer, Nadal and Djokovic. Now, a New Generation is transitioning again. I enjoyed this thoroughly. The Intro in the beginning got me emotional. So many Great Champions in that 30-second Intro. I'm glad I started to watch Tennis and it is a privilege to watch these Champions winning these Titles in their illustrious careers.
Tennis is really lucky to have Federer Nadal and djokovic in 21st century
We agree with Nadal Federer and djokovic there would be no top 3
@Shawn 😂😂😂🤣
@Shawn Murray fan ?
@@Rohit-yb5nf Maybe Stan 😂
Don't you mean that the 21st is the lucky one to have the 3 of them.
2012 is such an underrated year. You had every member of the big three in peak form, and Murray. Apart from Paris, Nadal Federer and Djokovic won all the Masters 1000s. And they spilt all four slams (including Murray). Brilliant year for tennis.
2009 as well. Very competitive year, Davydenko, Del Potro, Soderling, Roddick, Murray all doing well, and last true prime Federer year imo (arguably first half or so of 17 too but seemed more of a resurgence)
But Nadal was injured in the second part of the season
Olympics too. Murray whooped Federer in the final with a home crowd, that was a big surprise.
@@cbockiii2514 I remember clear as daylight , that or the year b4 Andy hired Ivan Lendl as his coach after that he literally transformed himself to what he is now today. After Murray lost in Wimbledon final I knew he was hungry for redemption and was looking good . I couldn't sleep and had dreams that Fed won O was so disappointed lol. Murray was a "heel/villain" back then besides the top3 , like Medvedev now
Wow, Djokovic was present in every big title final in 2015 🤯
Thats why he got 16k ranking points, most ever....
From Paris 2014 till Miami 2016 he was literally in every major tournament final he played(he did not play Madrid)
Not in Madrid
16950, almost 17k ...!
@@DiegoPerez-wv8ml he didnt play ,he skipped
holy shit the big 3 dominate for so long its incredible
Shows you how weak the rest of the field is :(
Reminds me of Navratilova and Evert in the 70s and 80s.
1:49:20 Nadal is thinking "How am I going to bite this thing?"
looool
Wow. 2016 was just Murray's year. Mater 1000s, ATP Finals Win, and Olympic Gold
Amazing recap.
It's so weird that a legend like Nadal never won an ATP Finals, and also a number 1 and GS champions like Kafelnikov never won a M1000
Nadal still has time to win the ATP finals
@@bamssudardjo2572 Shanghai? Nadal already won Madrid indoor on hard court 2005 because if Madrid was change surface on clay court replaced Hamburg 2009. Nadal has won titles 7 out of 9 all ATP 1000 Masters.
Nadal never won a title Miami open and Paris.
@@bamssudardjo2572 How many titles does Federer have in Rome, Monte and Olympics for over 20 years?
ROGER never win Rome OPEN n monnte Carlo 1000 . For more than 20 y..till now.
Wow in the 2004 ATP Finals they were already proposing that Federer was the GOAT, that’s crazy!!!
Is so sad that at the end he wasn’t 😂.
@@susanamontoyajaramillo4579 He's a GOAT. Shut up, grandma
SUSANA MONTOYA JARAMILLO 😂👏🏻
@@susanamontoyajaramillo4579 he is
@@mike04574 only the third
Amazing to watch 30 years of amazing players. Most aesthetically pleasing players to watch are Federer and Sampras. Best player I think goes to Djokovic as he really doesn’t have a weakness except for his smash
The question is
How many times did you hear "he's done it!"
And what a way to do it
That will do it
Only one Djokovic winning all trophies and he did it TWICE. He is the GOAT
Goatkovic indeed
goat covid19 in Australia open?
@@thebravegurkhas7832 yep, and he is the only in the world winning grand slams without vaccine
@@leelong7934 24 winners 🏆
@@thebravegurkhas7832Wish we could know what was in that special cocktail his team give to him when he's losing a match or what he does in that bathroom break too😢
And the ♔ King of Master's 1000 Series Novak Djoković has Arrived at the Time 1.18.35-seconds at Indian Wales ... TROPHY'S 36 🏆
I’m so proud of Nole. He has come a long way & has shown vast improvements from the time he was a skinny kid with health issues up to now, winning the most masters titles and the only player with double golden masters
You have to feel that Andy Murray was up there with the big three in his ‘primes’ in 2010 and 2016 if you look at Shanghai 2010 and the Wimbledon finals he both won in straight sets
Yeah even in 08 he was up there with Djokovic imo at least. Gave Nadal & Federer run for their money even before 08, had wrist injury in 07. Very misleading to judge Wawrinka & Murray on the basis they both won 3 slams, Andy was much more consistent and on top week to week
1 % of % 1 yeah it’s really sad he got injured and now has probably passed his peak
Almost 2 hours... 30 years of Master history condensed into!!
LOVE this vid! A lot of the younger tennis fans (who’ve just started watching the sport over the last 5-10 years) probably aren’t aware of how many GREAT players were around in the 90s. Chang was an EXCELLENT player who won so many Masters 1000s and was great on all surfaces. Becker might be more associated with the 80s, but he was a fantastic player throughout much of the 90s as well. Also loved seeing Muster winning all the Masters 1000s that he did as well
This video just proves why Murray is so much better than Stan and it shouldn't be even a debate. Murray has 14 Masters 1000 and 1 atp finals in comparison to 1 masters 1000 of stan
Watching Tsonga win in Paris was beautiful.
Djokovic the only one to Win ALL the 9 Masters
Lendl laughs in the rear of the room
Love Djokovic ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
@@loganvervicos8395 Well Novak is still the only one to won them all,4 GS,9 masters and ATP finals.
@@loganvervicos8395 Did you see Lendl holding all 9 in this video? It says MASTERS not Grand Prix so Djokovic is the only one.
@@jacksongreene3687 Same thing, no?
Thanks for this video, brings back a lot of memories and skipped homework time watching these 90s matches.
The early 90's matches are so aesthetically pleasing
Didn't know Andrei Medvedev won 4 Masters, all on clay. But yet, he only had 3 good runs at the FO.
And of course, Marcelo Rios, the only slamless #1 in ATP history, I believe.
Had 2-0 set lead in 1999 Roland Garros final vs Agassi, that was reviving moment for great Americans carrer
3 Good runs in FO is no joke..
1:18:35 Beginning of a total domination
It was AO 2011 but yeah
I mean at that point Nadal had 18 Federer 17 and Djokovic 5 masters and now he have the most(36) and have double golden masters(nobody even won one) feels insane.
Man too bad there’s no grass master tournaments for fed
Yeah there really should be one, upgrade Halle or Queens to masters and downgrade one of the others (preferably one of the American ones)
@@alexfrye6 no downgrade China no players are from China
@@pettitlawncarelandscaping419 Shanghai would be the wrong one to get rid of as it's the only big tournament in the whole of asia. USA don't need three masters and a slam. Paris could also be the one to go, one city doesn't need a slam and a masters.
Yes Federer is for grass only...
Djokovic would be winning most of them since 2011.
Great compilation, worth watching for almost 2 hours. Lot of great champions, just a couple of "intruders". So the best player never to win Masters 1000 must be 2 time Grand Slam champion Kafelnikov. What a about best player never to win ATP Finals? Well, I think we all know the answer- Rafael Nadal of course
The only piece missing from his trophy cabinet
Roger and Novak have their French opens, Nadal deserves that title.
He does have the Olympic gold tho
@@BrandonSG13 For me it will be difficult for Rafa because he is already 35, and the next gen Is knocking at the door ..
Rafa never won Miami, but is a 5 time finalist. I'm sure he wants one win there before he retires.
Novak djokovic is the beast. Play Less year but have more titles.
Djokovic took 12 years since his first title to get all Master 1000 titles (9 in total), he got them all in 2018 for the first time, in 2020 he got his Second Career Golden Master title. Nadal is still looking to get it at least once, as well as Federer. #funfact
Video of the year.
Wow, such an achievement video ! How it brings the light on the eras with the biggest champions ! Amazin g!
Seeing the 2002-2003 bit was really interesting for me, with Hewitt really showing his talent (now I realize how much he won before Federer, who had like a 7-match losing streak against him I believe) with Agassi and Moya still sticking in there. That was pretty much the last really varied year in terms of big tournament wins. Ever since then it’s all a very select group of players, probably because the sport has become much more serious over the years. You truly have to be the best and devote your whole upbringing to the sport to get anywhere. Well, unless you’re Kyrgios...
But yeah, 2003 had like ten different players win a tournament whereas in 2009 it’s like three
More serious? It’s cuz there was more parity. And the big 3 made it like a ring around the rosie lol
the weakest era ever. Complete hacks like Pavel and Mantilla were champions.
@@AlanRR121 How are they hacks? Mantilla was top ten and Pavel was top 15. Just cuz u started following tennis 3 years ago and havent heard of them doesnt make them hacks.
And even if they were lower ranked, stop with the tennis elitism. The ppl who win deserve to win because they had an amazing week where they played as if they were top 5 players at the least. Who cares if they dont have the consistency of other freaks of nature, they put in much harder work into tennis than most ppl do on anything
Thanks for putting together a compilation that has a nice blend of yesteryear and today.
It's a shame that the 4 GRAND Slams are not managed by ATP. I would love to have this kind of UA-cam content for Wimbledon, RG, US & Aussie Opens...
Great 30 year! Thank you! Agassi was my superstar!
Super job!
30 YEARS and there is only ONE man who won all the masters the GOLDEN MASTER DJOKERNOLE !!!
lendl done it also 80/89
GO DJOKO
DJOKOVICtory
Double golden master
@@jeannemarddelislam1631 No wonder Murray became so good as soon as Lendl joined his camp in 2011/12
@@jeannemarddelislam1631 I see it on ultimatetennisstatistics.com but Masters began on 1990 and Atp only count since this time , Can you tell me reason?
Murray is much bigger than Stan
Zverev is much bigger than Kyrgios
Who cares. Rafter is 4-0 v festered. It’s about rankings and achievements. Unfortunately nick isn’t disciplined or fit enough
Rodrigo R kyrgios is a joke. 25 years old and not even one single Master 1000.
@1 % of % 1 And Canas is tied with Federer for h2h, but I wouldn't ex-act ly look at them as equals. H2H is something that matters when you look at people like Federer, Djoković and Nadal, so guys with countless big titles and weeks on number 1 spot and countless matches between each other. Not between one man who actually has multiple major titles and one who hasn't won anything.
In terms of Master 1000 wins I agree for Murray ... But for me Kyrgios is amazing talent and definitely more attractive then Zverev
Djokovic is a machine! Also fair play to Murray he achieved a lot in masters 1000 considering he has been up against the 3 goats.
What a wonderful video. Tennis History!
This must have taken a lot of work. THANK YOU!
1:18:35 Djokovic era begins 😎
🤓
Murray and Roddick would’ve been so much more successful if it wasn’t for Djokovic and Federer.
Edit: I meant Roddick would’ve been much more successful if it wasn’t for Federer and Murray would’ve been more successful if it wasn’t for Djokovic
@Berk Arslan probably because Novak and Federer played more against murray
May be Roddick, but not Murray
@@vivmartica.438 Murray's a far superior player to Roddick. But it's pointless for people to say "if it wasn't for x, y would have been more successful". Have to deal with reality.
And so would have Berdych, Ferrer, Tsonga, Del Potro, Cilic, Raonic, Nishikori, etc.
Shawn what are you on about?
brilliant stuff. and watching tennis pros try to lift heavy trophies is also priceless.
Kafelnikv: knock knock..Can I come in?
God of Masters: What?? Nooooo...
Shinoj Nambiar Kafelikovs career or Chang’s
@@vivahernando1 Kafelnikovs anyday..2 Grand Slams and an Olympic Gold..
What a previlige it has been to watch Roger,Rafa & Novak for last 17 years…
Omg what a brilliant brilliant upload. Tennis fans like me are so fortunate to have people like yourself and the many others on UA-cam who upload these great tennis videos. Thank you so so much.
That was awesome brought back a lot of memories, and some I forgot about so many great players that performed at such high levels for a long period of time.
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤ great collection amazing work admin
Wow that Aguilera win in Hamburg really was a memorable point...
game set & match djokovic ... game set & match djokovic ...
Amazing No1e! ❤️
Honestly thought sampras would have won more than he did. Even though he won quite a bit. There’s such a huge difference between the 80’s, 90’s, and early 2000’s with so many different winners as opposed to now with the big 4 winning 99% of them lol
nadal, djokovic, federer alone won over 100 final out of 300 its insane if you think this video start 13 years before first federer title
Lmao over half the video is Fed/Nadal/Novak, they literally ruled 20 years. Like almost 100 masters titles between them. Bizarre. The fact that Nadal literally won every clay tournament almost every year is scary. I forgot how dominant he was then and still now.
Not to take away Rafa's incredible achievements on clay but your statement is very wrong.
He never won literally every clay tournament in a single year (that would be impossible). He did win all three clay masters and Roland Garros one time in 2010.
Sergio Sarmiento he had 35 masters titles and most are clay, he also has won 12 RG in 15 years, that’s pretty much dominating. I didn’t mean he won all of them, but compared to other people he won so much.
@@a_goblue2023 yep, he is the god of clay.
@@sergiosarmiento4371 If I'm not mistaken, I think most clay court titles in one season holds Muster, 11 in 1995
@@gregorsamsa555 thanks for the fun fact. I didn't follow tennis back then so I don't know if you're right but I believe you.
12:20 it was on the line. Also at 15:30 same thing. Same tournament 93 and 94, same two players Chang and Edberg and same two scenarios. What were the odds on that?
Since 2005, there are just bread crumbs for those out of the big 4! 16 years and still going !
Cincinnati Masters had a nice trophy back then.
Thanks for thissss
The Aguilera-Becker point might work as insomnia-cure ;-)
Not for me, f...ng pushers always give me nightmares 🤯
And yet we see Nadal-Djokovic and Murray-Djokovic have those kind of rallies on HCs that end in an error.
W. D. Completely agree, even Aguilera's footwork looks like a 60 year old guy at the club who outsmarts you with his old school tactics
Longest rally
So looks like medvedev, korda, they all played in 90's and now re-born and re-enters the tour.
thanks ATP
There is no cricket it's okay bt life without no tennis tournaments is boring.....
Monte Carlo upped their game, that trophy the first several years was anemic to say the least.
these points gonna be firee
Most number of titles to the 🐐 Djokovic. Only guy to win them all. And he has won them all at least twice. Djokovic faced a lot of tough losses and then came back to win the titles, unlike Roger and Rafa.
05,12 Paris
I thought both never win Masters titles in careers. I’m glad for it!!
courier won the first sunshine double!!! wow!
Imagine there was a single grass court masters 1000? Federer would EASILY be holding the record today.
Career defining moments galore there
What a video!! Bravo
Watched all at a single go.. more for Fedal...
It would be interesting to know what percentage of Masters 1000 & ATP Finals titles, Novak, Roger, Nadal and Murray have won since 2005. Must be like 80%....
I love Tennis 🎾💙💚♥️
Funny how in early 90's players got really excited after winning. nowadays masters is just a warm up for the slams for top players
Poor Kafelnikov...
Federer starts popping up in 2002, big jump in 2003, then dominates the rest of the way.
Tsonga run's at Toronto 2014 was amazing.
1:18:35 new tennis order 🔥
A career defining moment for everybody!!
Great, we need a vídeo of Australian Open championship points since 90s
Rafa is my favorite, 35 master1000 titles and counting ...
The question is who is going to end up with the most titles. I'd bet on Djokovic because he's younger and playing so well right now, but it could easily be Nadal. Federer has to have another incredible year to stay on top of them.
Djokovic 36 new record
@@gagdsgvgd6f734 now Djokovic has 37, and he’s the only one to achieve the career Golden Master title
So many players I completely forgot about!
What a compilation
2017 Federer vs 2016 Murray would be a good match
Many times when someone lost in the final, he won the next one
So many oddball champions in Paris-Bercy
Tennis best sport ever imho
97-99 Grande Ríos!
Sí una lástima pero igual se agradece todo lo que hizo, qué fué bastante
Yeah, loco Chino, lot of talent, average height, but boy he had great hands
Nadal with the 8 year Monte Carlo streak. Insanity.
The best video of tennis tv
fantastic videopedia Collection
Ferrer, Tsonga, Nishikori, Isner have all played more 1000 finals than Wawrinka. Goffin, Simon and Gasquet have played the same amount. Yet Stan has 3 Grand Slams. Stan is a weird, awesome man.
No, Wawrinka has played more Masters finals than them. In Masters finals Wawrinka is 1-3, Goffin is 0-1, Simon is 0-2, and Gasquet is 0-3. But you'd think Wawrinka would have at least 4 or 5
@@pettitlawncarelandscaping419 Does that include ATP Finals at the end of the year. Cause Goffin appears there as well. We can see him twice in finals this video.
Thanks 4 this!